Express Bus Service

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Express Bus Service Form Revised: September 1999 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: November 26, 2008 SUBJECT: EXPRESS BUS SERVICE ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDATIONS 1) Approve the elimination of the premium fare on the 141 DOWNTOWN/MT PLEASANT EXPRESS, 142 DOWNTOWN/AVENUE RD EXPRESS, and 144 DOWNTOWN/DON VALLEY EXPRESS bus routes, so that customers pay only a regular fare, as described in this report, effective September 8, 2009; 2) Note that: • in 2008, service levels have been improved on 21 existing local-express bus services; • in 2008, new periods of operation have been implemented on six existing local- express services • new local-express service will be introduced, on a trial basis, on the 41 KEELE and 60 STEELES WEST bus routes, as described in this report; • more-frequent service will be introduced, on a trial basis, on the existing local- express services on the 35E JANE and 96E WILSON bus routes, as described in this report; • an additional downtown/express bus service on Bayview Avenue will be assessed in conjunction with the planned post-implementation review of the introduction of regular fares on downtown express services recommended above; • a comprehensive evaluation of opportunities for express bus operations on all of the other major bus routes in the system has been carried out, and has concluded that additional express bus operations are not recommended at this time because they would not provide sufficient benefit to customers to justify their costs; EXPRESS BUS SERVICE Page 2 • the operation of limited-stop express bus services on the six future Transit City LRT corridors now served by buses, until the new LRT services begin, is not recommended because they would require the addition of 54 peak buses, and would cost approximately $5.6-million per year in additional direct operating costs, and have few passenger benefits over and above the express services already in operation on a number of these lines; and • Forward this report to all City councillors, Mississauga Transit, York Region Transit, Brampton Transit, Durham Region Transit, GO Transit, and Metrolinx. FUNDING The recommended conversion of routes from premium fare to regular fare would decrease fare revenue by approximately $300,000 per year. This loss of revenue has not been budgeted for in the 2009 Operating Budget. Other service increases described in this report can be accommodated within the 2009 Operating Budget. BACKGROUND TTC staff have initiated work on a Transit City Bus Plan which is a comprehensive review of bus operations on all major routes in the system, focusing on improving the speed of operations and customer-focused amenities. The Bus Plan involves assessing all aspects of bus operations including the design of services, physical road improvement (queue jump lanes, for example) to speed operations, improved stop locations and shelter treatments, improved customer information systems, and branding. As a first step in the development of the Bus Plan, staff have completed a comprehensive review of the use of express buses at the TTC, and these results are presented in this report. The report summarises approximately 20 proposals for new express bus services. DISCUSSION The TTC currently operates 22 express bus services. These are shown in Exhibit 1, attached. These can be broadly categorised in three ways: • “Local-Express” Bus Services: usually consist of an express branch that operates on a regular TTC route, often in the peak-periods from Monday to Friday only. The express buses typically serve all local stops at the outer end of the route and then serve limited stops only as they get closer to the subway station. These services are implemented when there are overall passenger benefits to reassigning existing local buses on the route to express bus operation on a no-net cost basis. • Rocket Routes: These are limited-stop express routes that generally link two major transit destinations. They typically have peak-period service and some off-peak EXPRESS BUS SERVICE Page 3 service. These services involve additional costs which must be justified through the route’s ability to attract new riders to the system. • Downtown Express Routes: These are routes that operate directly to the downtown in the morning peak-period and from downtown in the afternoon peak-period. They provide an alternative to travel on the Yonge Subway or parallel local bus and streetcar routes. Premium fares are charged for travel on these routes. Express services improve service for customers by reducing travel time and making transit a more-attractive travel option, compared to other ways of travelling. The local-express services reduce operating costs on long routes, because fewer buses, overall, are required to provide the required capacity, compared to operating all the buses in slower local service. The Rocket Routes and downtown express routes generally require an overall increase in operating costs. The provision of a direct no-transfer and fast service to link major destinations means that the Rocket Routes provide substantial benefits to customers, and attract new customers to the TTC because of the reduced travel time. Three of the four downtown express routes importantly provide an alternative to peak- period travel on the Yonge Subway. Ridership in recent years has been relatively low on the downtown express routes. Express services are routinely evaluated in the same way as all other TTC routes, using the Commission-approved Service Standards. Since 2003, 16 requests for new or improved express services have been formally analysed as part of the report on Service Improvements, of which three have been implemented. Many other service improvements have been made to express bus services in recent years. Between February and September, 2008, service was increased on 13 express routes, to reduce crowding. In February, 2008, new Monday-Friday midday and early evening and Saturday daytime express service was introduced on the 39E FINCH EAST (Finch Station-Neilson Express) branch, and new Monday-Friday early evening express service was introduced on the 53E STEELES EAST (Finch Station-Markham Road Express) branch. Starting on November 23, 2008, as part of the TTC’s Ridership Growth Strategy, new and increased express services were introduced on several routes. New service during the late evenings from Monday to Friday and the evenings on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays was introduced on the 191 HIGHWAY 27 ROCKET route. New service during the late evenings on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays began on the 190 SCARBOROUGH CENTRE ROCKET route. New service during the late evenings from Monday to Friday, the evenings on Saturdays, and all day on Sundays and holidays is now operating on the 196 YORK UNIVERSITY ROCKET route. New off-peak service at all times of the week has been introduced on the 116E MORNINGSIDE (Kennedy Station-University of Toronto Scarborough) branch. Service has been increased during the peak-periods on the 39E FINCH EAST (Finch Station-Neilson Express) branch, the 45E KIPLING (Kipling Station-Steeles) branch, the 131E NUGGET (Kennedy Station-Old Finch Express) service, 86E SCARBOROUGH (Kennedy Station–Sheppard Express) branch, the 53E/F STEELES EAST express branches, the 60E/F STEELES WEST express branches, the 190 SCARBOROUGH CENTRE ROCKET route, and the 196 YORK UNIVERSITY ROCKET route. EXPRESS BUS SERVICE Page 4 Starting on January 5, 2009, service during the peak-periods on the 39 FINCH EAST EXPRESS route will be extended east from Neilson Road to Old Finch Avenue and Valley Centre Drive. This change is being made as part of the report on Service Improvements for 2008. The balance of this report discusses additional possible express bus services, and summarises a systematic review that has been made of possible additional express services on all major routes and along significant transit corridors. Local-Express Services – Review of Existing Routes A comprehensive review has been undertaken of existing and possible new local-express services. The ridership, costs, and customer benefits of all existing express services were evaluated. Based on this evaluation, two routes with existing express service, the 35E JANE (Jane Station-York University Express) and 96E WILSON (Wilson Station-Humber College Express) have been identified as underperforming. Ridership and service levels on these two services are relatively low, and the overall benefit to customers provided by the express services on these two routes is less than if the services were discontinued and the resources reinvested into local service. Both of these routes provide relatively infrequent express service, however, (every 14 minutes on 35E JANE and every 21 minutes on 96E WILSON) and the lack of success on these services may be the result of relatively infrequent express service. In order to determine if increased service on the two underperforming express services would attract additional customers, service on the 35E JANE (Jane Station-York University Express) and 96E WILSON (Wilson Station-Humber College Express) branches will be increased to a bus approximately every 12 minutes, from the present 14- to 21-minute service. This change will be made, on a trial basis, beginning in November, 2009. The changes would require the addition of three morning peak and five afternoon peak-period buses. Sufficient resources are available in the 2009 Operating Budget for this change. Ridership and route performance on these two services will be re-evaluated in the spring of 2010, at the end of the trial period. If ridership has not increased and the overall benefit to customers of the express service is not positive, then these express services will be discontinued. Service and ridership characteristics on the other existing nineteen local-express routes are satisfactory. Ridership levels are higher, and the express services provide an overall benefit to customers. No route or service level changes are recommended for these services. Many of these have had service increases in 2008 to reduce crowding, and service will continue to be increased if and when ridership exceeds the maximum planned levels.
Recommended publications
  • City of Toronto: Get Involved
    City of Toronto: Get involved http://www.toronto.ca/involved/projects/malvern_lrt/faq.htm Scarborough-Malvern Light Rail Transit (LRT) Transit City Updated of November 13, 2009 Malvern Light Rail in 51 languages Transit Frequently Asked Questions Frequently asked questions General Contact us When is the earliest that construction could start and finish? How will Transit City help Toronto? How is Light Rail Transit (LRT) superior to existing streetcar service in Toronto? What work has been completed since the last round of Open Houses in 2008? What specific transit connections is the LRT aiming to address? Existing Bus Routes What will happen to existing bus routes in the area after the LRT is built / Which routes will be changed or removed? Connections and Service How will a connection be made at Kennedy Station? How does the Scarborough-Malvern LRT relate/connect to the proposed extension of the Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT)? Are both projects (Malvern and SRT) needed north of Sheppard Avenue? What are the future plans for TTC connections at the Guildwood GO / VIA Rail Station? Could GO / TTC increase parking spots at Guildwood GO/ VIA Rail Station? Could the Eglinton Crosstown LRT and Scarborough-Malvern LRT terminate at Guildwood GO / VIA Rail Station instead of Kennedy Station? How will the Scarborough-Malvern LRT connect with the Kingston Rd transit project? How frequently will vehicles serve the Scarborough-Malvern LRT route? (e.g. every 10 minutes)? Protecting Green Space How will green spaces and trees (Morningside Park) be protected?
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Opening of the Todd Bardes Meadowlands Side Trail by Nancy Tilt, TBTC Conservation Committee
    Winter 2016-2017 THE QUARTERLY OF THE TORONTO BRUCE TRAIL CLUB Vol. LIII No. 4 www.torontobrucetrailclub.org | 416-763-9061 | [email protected] Grand Opening of the Todd Bardes Meadowlands Side Trail by Nancy Tilt, TBTC Conservation Committee Friends and family, hikers, and Toronto Bruce Trail Club Conservation Committee members, about 75 in all, gathered at Limehouse Com- munity Hall on a beautiful early September Sunday. The occasion was the Grand Opening of a new Side Trail in memory of Todd Bardes, a dedicated and treasured Bruce Trail volunteer. Car and bus thru-hikes had been organized for the day to coincide with the early afternoon opening of the Trail. Peter Leeney, friend of Todd and currently Land Stewardship Director and past President of the Toronto Club, spoke of Todd's long history with the Bruce Trail. Todd joined the Bruce Trail Association in 1994 and had been actively involved with trail activities since 1996 both at the club level, the broader Board level, and most recently as President. In 2001 the Bruce Trail purchased the 39-acre Springle property just north of Limehouse. Todd and his wife, Christina, subsequently took on the role of Land Stewards. Existing ATV disturbance in the mead- owland portion of the property was an issue needing attention. Fellow Bruce Trail volunteer, Andrew Costley, came up with the idea of a community-based and monitored Side Trail through the meadow. Todd, along with support from other volunteers, wholeheartedly agreed, and through their efforts the Side Trail came to life. Andrew Costley, on behalf of all volunteers who knew Todd, spoke Hike Leader Training 2017 of him as a friend and mentor, providing both advice and leadership with wise and patient counsel.
    [Show full text]
  • STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 8304 Sheppard Avenue East
    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 8304 Sheppard Avenue East - Official Plan & Rezoning Applications - Preliminary Report Date: February 16, 2010 To: Planning and Growth Management Committee From: Chief Planner and Executive Director Wards: Ward 42 – Scarborough-Rouge River Reference 10 102286 ESC 42 OZ Number: SUMMARY These applications were made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006. These applications propose a Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Light Rail Vehicle (LRV) Maintenance and Storage Facility at 8304 Sheppard Avenue East. This facility is intended to serve the Sheppard East, Eglinton Crosstown and Scarborough Malvern Light Rail Transit (LRT) lines which are all part of the Transit City Plan. This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted applications and seeks Planning and Growth Management Committee’s direction on the further processing of the applications and on the community consultation process. These applications seeks to permit a maintenance and storage facility which is a key component of the Transit City Plan. Accordingly, staff is of the view that the application should be deemed a matter of City-wide interest and that all planning reports be routed through and the public Staff report for action – Preliminary Report - 8304 Sheppard Avenue East 1 meeting held before the Planning and Growth Management Committee. The applications should proceed through the normal planning process in terms of community consultation. Staff will attempt to combine the community consultation for these Planning Act applications with the second public open house to be held as part of the required Environmental Assessment process.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Planning in Toronto: Roles, Priorities and Our Decision Making Framework
    INFORMATION ONLY ____________________________________________________________________________ Subject: Transit Planning in Toronto: roles, priorities and our decision making framework Date: July 29, 2015 At the TTC Board meeting on July 29, 2015, Jennifer Keesmaat, Chief Planner, City of Toronto will deliver a presentation titled “Transit Planning in Toronto: roles, priorities and our decision making framework.” Original signed by Vincent Rodo Chief Financial & Administration Officer 1-17 Transit Planning in Toronto: Roles, Priorities and our decision making framework TTC Board Meeting July 29, 2015 Jennifer Keesmaat, Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning Division PLANNING A GREAT CITY, TOGETHER Overview of Presentation 1. Role of the City Planning Division in Transit Planning 2. Key Transit Planning Projects • SmartTrack/RER • Relief Line Project Assessment • Scarborough Subway Extension Project Assessment • Metrolinx LRT Program • King Streetcar Enhancements • “Feeling Congested?” Transportation Official Plan Review ruill_TORDNIO 2 City Planning Division PROGRAMS • Application Review • Business Performance & Standards • Civic Design • Committee of Adjustment • Design Review • Community Policy • Environmental Planning • Graphics & Visualization • Heritage Preservation • Official Plan & Zoning By-law • Outreach and Engagement • Public Art • Research & Information • Strategic Initiatives • Transit Planning • Waterfront Renewal 3 Transit Implementation Unit Objective Transit planning in the City of Toronto requires a transparent,
    [Show full text]
  • Transit City Progress Update
    Toronto Transit City Light Rail Plan City – TTC Team Progress Update February, 2008 Transit City Progress Update CATEGORIES 1. Light Rail Lines and Facilities 2. Vehicles 3. System and Design Standards 4. Processes 1 Progress Update – Light Rail Lines and Facilities PRIORITIZATION OF LINES • report to Commission : November 14, 2007 • lines evaluated against 31 criteria • results: confirm top 3 priorities: – Sheppard East LRT – Etobicoke-Finch West LRT – Eglinton Crosstown LRT • endorsed by Commission, Metrolinx 2 Criteria for Evaluation of Transit City LRT Lines Line Performance: Environmental: • Ridership • Number of Car-Trips Diverted / Replaced – Existing • Reduction in Greenhouse Gases – Projected • Current Market Share / Mode Split • New Rapid Transit Coverage, Reach Constructability, Physical Challenges: – Area (hectares) – Population • Major Physical Challenges, Obstacles – Full-time Jobs • Municipal Right-of-Way Available – Part-time Jobs • Designated, Recognized in Official Plan • Major Generators • Community, Political Acceptance, Support – En Route • Access to Yard, Maintenance Facilities – Terminals – New (Annual) Passenger-Trips/Route-Kilometre – Total (Annual) Passenger-Trips/Route-Kilometre Capital Cost: • Cost/Rider • Construction, Property Costs • Vehicle Costs City- and Region-Building: • Pro-rated Maintenance Facility Costs • Supports MoveOntario 2020 Objectives • Total Cost/Kilometre • Supports Places to Grow Principles • Supports Toronto Official Plan Objectives – Serves Priority Neighbourhoods – Avenues – Re-urbanization
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
    The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Renewal of West Construction Field Office Lease 1 East
    Insert TTC logo here STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Renewal of West Construction Field Office Lease – 1 East Mall Crescent Date: April 27, 2016 To: TTC Board From: Chief Executive Officer Summary The purpose of this report is to seek the Board’s approval, in respect of the lease of the premises located at 1 East Mall Crescent, Suite 200 (the West Construction Field Office), to extend the term of the lease for an additional five years, subject to the terms and conditions outlined in this report. Recommendations It is recommended that the Board: 1. Authorize the execution of the lease amendment agreement to extend the lease between Madekat Holdings Corporation and the Toronto Transit Commission for the lease of the premises located at 1 East Mall Crescent, Suite 200, Toronto, for a term of five years, and amend the lease to provide for an additional option to extend for five years in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the agreement and as summarized in this report, in accordance with the Toronto Transit Commission’s policies, and any other documents or agreements arising as a result of entry into the lease, acceptable to the TTC’s Head - Legal and General Counsel. 2. Approve the expenditure of $396,980 plus HST for rent payments for the premises (including utilities) for a five year term, subject to change from current projections due to the escalation of additional rent, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the lease. Implementation Points The recommendations are for TTC staff to proceed with negotiations of the extension and amendment of the lease in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Improvements for 2002
    SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS FOR 2002 Subway Streetcars Buses RT October 2001 Service Improvements for 2002 - 2 - Table of contents Table of contents Summary................................................................................................................................................................4 Recommendations ..............................................................................................................................................5 1. Planning transit service ...............................................................................................................................6 2. Recommended new and revised services for the Sheppard Subway .......................................10 Sheppard Subway.................................................................................................................................................................................10 11 BAYVIEW – Service to Bayview Station...........................................................................................................................................10 25 DON MILLS – Service to Don Mills Station ....................................................................................................................................11 Don Mills/Scarborough Centre – New limited-stop rocket route ....................................................................................................11 Finch East – Service to Don Mills Station...........................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016
    Bolton Residential Expansion Study (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016 The purpose of this memorandum is to review the professional literature pertaining to the potential develop- ment of a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the Bolton Residential Expansion Study area, in response to the Region of Peel’s recent release of the Discussion Paper. The Discussion Paper includes the establishment of evaluation themes and criteria, which are based on provincial and regional polices, stakeholder and public comments. It should be noted that while the Discussion Paper and the Region’s development of criteria does not specifi- cally advocate for TOD, it is the intent of this memorandum to illustrate that TOD-centric planning will not only adequately address such criteria, but will also complement and enhance the Region’s planning principles, key points and/or themes found in stakeholder and public comments. In the following are research findings related to TOD generally, and specifically, theMetrolinx Mobility Hub Guidelines For The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (September 2011) objectives. Additionally, following a review and assessment of the “Response to Comments Submitted on the Bolton Residential Expansion Study ROPA” submission prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc. (March 15, 2016), this memorandum evaluates some of the key arguments and assumptions made in this submission relative to the TOD research findings. Planning for Transit-Oriented Developments TOD policy and programs can result in catalytic development that creates walkable, livable neighborhoods around transit providing economic, livability and equitable benefits. The body of research on TODs in the United States has shown that TODs are more likely to succeed when project planning takes place in conjunction with transit system expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • 831, 833, and 837 Glencairn Avenue and 278, 280 and 282 Hillmount Avenue – Zoning By-Law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications Final Report
    REPORT FOR ACTION 831, 833, and 837 Glencairn Avenue and 278, 280 and 282 Hillmount Avenue – Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications Final Report Date: November 15, 2019 To: North York Community Council From: Director, Community Planning, North York District Wards: Ward 8 - Eglinton-Lawrence Planning Application Number: 18 185562 NNY 15 OZ Rental Housing Application Number: 18 209677 NNY 15 RH SUMMARY This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the City's Zoning By-law 569-2013 and Zoning By-law 7625 for the former City of North York for the property at 831, 833 and 837 Glencairn Avenue and 278, 280 and 282 Hillmount Avenue to permit the construction of a 10 storey (30 metre, excluding mechanical penthouse) mixed use residential and commercial building with a total gross floor area (GFA) of 16,876 square metres and a floor space index (FSI) of 4.55 times the area of the lot. A Rental Housing Demolition application was submitted under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code to demolish a total of 11 residential dwelling units, five of which were last used for residential rental purposes, located within six buildings at 831, 833, and 837 Glencairn Avenue and 278, 280 and 282 Hillmount Avenue. The building would have 218 residential units including two live-work units and 367 square metres of retail uses on the ground floor along Marlee Avenue. A total of 190 vehicle parking spaces are proposed, of which 5 spaces would be on the surface at the rear of the building and the remainder in two underground levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Provincial Proposals Line 2 East Extension
    EX9.1 Attachment 5 – Assessment of Provincial Proposals Line 2 East Extension As directed by City Council in April 2019, City and TTC staff have assessed the Province’s proposed 3-stop Line 2 East Extension. The details of this assessment are provided in this attachment. 1. Project Summary 1.1 Project Description The Line 2 East Extension (L2EE), as proposed by the Province, is an approximately 8 kilometre underground extension of Line 2 Bloor-Danforth from Kennedy Station that will have three stations – at Lawrence and McCowan, Scarborough Centre and Sheppard and McCowan, as shown in Figure 1. The Province's plan for the L2EE is similar to what was being planned by the City and TTC prior to 2016. Figure 1 - Line 2 East Extension Reference Map Note: Map produced by City/TTC based on current understanding of project Attachment 5 – Assessment of Line 2 East Extension Page 1 of 9 As proposed, the extension will be fully integrated with the existing Line 2 and have through service at Kennedy Station. A turn-back may be included east of Kennedy Station to enable reduced service to Scarborough Centre, subject to demand and service standards. The extension will require approximately seven additional six-car, 138-metre-long trains to provide the service. The trains would be interoperable with the other trains on Line 2. With the station at Sheppard and McCowan supporting storage of up to six trains, there is sufficient storage and maintenance capacity existing at the TTC’s Line 2 storage and maintenance facilities to accommodate this increase in fleet size.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto-Ontario Transit Update
    EX9.1 Attachment 3 STATUS OF PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS Background In April 2019, City Council considered a supplementary report from the City Manager on Toronto's Transit Expansion Program- Update and Next Steps (EX4.1d). This report included an attachment which contained a series of preliminary technical questions for the Province related to the four transit projects identified in the 2019 Ontario Budget, released in April. Throughout Q2 and Q3 2019, City and TTC staff have met with Provincial staff for the purposes of carrying out the technical assessment of the Province’s transit proposal as directed by Council. Through this process, City and TTC staff have received information and insight that informs the responses below, and is reflective of the various stages of design of the Province's priority projects. In some instances, further work and due diligence will be required as planning and design development progresses. Further information on the projects as well as more detailed technical information on the staff assessment can be found Attachment 4- Assessment of Ontario Line and Attachment 5- Assessment of Line 2 East Extension. # Question and Status of Current Answer Transit Planning and Design 1 At what stage in the project lifecycle is each project, relative to either the City/TTC project lifecycle map (in EX4.1) or the Metrolinx Benefits Management Framework? Based on the information provided by the Province through the Ontario-Toronto Transit Expansion Technical Working Group, the City and TTC have assessed that the projects
    [Show full text]