DOCSLIB.ORG

Total Return Swap (TRS)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Total Return Swap (TRS) Total Return Swap (TRS) Author: Financial-edu.com A Total Return Swap (TRS) is a bilateral financial transaction where the counterparties swap the total return of a single asset or basket of assets in exchange for periodic cash flows, typically a floating rate such as LIBOR +/- a basis point spread and a guarantee against any capital losses. A TRS is similar to a plain vanilla swap except the deal is structured such that the total return (cash flows plus capital appreciation/depreciation) is exchanged, rather than just the cash flows. A key feature of a TRS is that the parties do not transfer actual ownership of the assets, as occurs in a repo transaction. This allows greater flexibility and reduced up-front capital to execute a valuable trade. This also means Total Return Swaps can be more highly leveraged, making them a favorite of hedge funds. Total Return Swaps (TRS) are also known as Total Rate of Return Swaps (TROR). Market Participants The Total Return Swap market is strictly institutional over the counter (OTC). Market participants include investment banks (Goldman Sachs, JPMorganChase), commercial banks (Bank of America, Sumitomo), mutual funds (Prudential, Merrill Lynch Asset Management), hedge funds, funds of funds, private equity funds, pension funds (CalPers), university endowments (Harvard, University of California), credit card lenders (American Express, MBNA/Bank of America), insurance companies (AIG, State Farm), governments, non- governmental (NGO) organizations (World Bank, Inter-American Development Bank), home loan banks (FHLB, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac), and the Treasury departments of large multinational corporations (Wal-Mart, British Petroleum). A variety of special purpose vehicles (SPVs) such as CDOs and real estate investment trusts (REITs) also participate in the TRS market. The TRS market was traditionally between commercial banks where one party (Bank A) had exceeded its balance sheet limits, and the other (Bank B) had balance sheet capacity available. Bank A could shift assets off its balance sheet synthetically and gain additional income with less risk. Bank B could "lease" the assets of Bank A by paying some regular cash flows and offering a guarantee against any capital losses. In the last 10 years, hedge funds and special purpose vehicles have become a major force in the TRS market. Now the most common use of a TRS is for "leveraged balance sheet arbitrage", whereby a hedge fund lacking a large balance sheet and seeking leveraged exposure to particular assets pays for that exposure by "leasing" the assets from a major bank, mutual fund, or securities dealer. The hedge fund hopes to generate high asset returns without having to tie up its capital by buying those assets for its own account. The bank, fund, or dealer hopes to generate additional cash flow by charging a spread over and above the market returns it receives from lending or other activities, and receiving a guarantee against depreciation of the assets. A TRS can be structured on any type of reference asset, including single equities, indexes, leases, oil-backed credit obligations, baskets of corporate bonds, mortgages, municipal bonds, other swaps or derivatives, real property, credit card ABS, residential MBS, CDO notes, investment grade convertible bonds, etc. This makes the range of potential market participants extremely broad. TRS Transaction Structure A TRS is made up of two legs, the Return Leg (or Total Return Leg) and the Funding Leg. The reference asset or basket of assets exists on the Return Leg. The cash flow payment stream exists on the Funding Leg. The Return Leg is generally made up of two components: cash flows and capital appreciation of the reference asset(s). The Funding Leg also has two components: floating coupons based on LIBOR +/- a spread and payments to offset any capital depreciation of the reference asset(s). Additional legs may be structured to account for reinvestment of returns, interest payments on collateral / haircuts, multi-currency flows, or differing payment schedules. Fees, spreads, principal payments, etc. may be added in a customized structure. The Return Leg counterparty is called the Total Return Payer, Swap Seller, Buyer of protection, or Beneficiary. Here, we will use the term Total Return Payer or TRP. The TRP (typically a bank, fund, or dealer) has a long position in the reference asset or basket of assets, holding them on its balance sheet. The TRP "buys protection" on these asset returns by agreeing to pay all of the future returns of the reference asset(s) in exchange for a floating stream of payments, usually LIBOR +/- a spread, plus a guaranteed offset of any capital losses incurred by the reference asset(s). The TRP gives up one set of expected future returns (capital appreciation, coupons, fees, dividends, etc.) in exchange for another set of future returns (LIBOR coupons +/- a spread) and capital loss insurance. This allows the TRP to lock in the value of its asset(s) and receive additional income. The Funding Leg counterparty is called the Total Return Receiver, Swap Buyer, Seller of protection, or Guarantor. Here, we will use the term Total Return Receiver or TRR. The TRR seeks exposure to the returns of the reference asset or basket of assets, but does not want to purchase and hold them on its balance sheet. This party "sells protection" on the TRP's asset(s) by taking a synthetic long position in the asset(s) and making regular floating cash flow payments and capital loss guarantee payments to the TRP. The TRR seeks leveraged returns, and will pay for access to those returns, while taking on the risk of capital losses. Total Return Payers are usually large institutions with big balance sheets such as commercial banks, investment banks, mutual funds, securities dealers, and insurance companies. Total Return Payers have lower cost of funding than Total Return Buyers, but their returns are often limited by regulatory capital requirements or conservative strategies. By "leasing" a portion of its strong balance sheet with a TRS, a TRP can achieve higher returns while ensuring against capital losses. Total Return Receivers are usually aggressive hedge funds, specialty asset managers, and CLO special vehicles who accumulate leveraged credit and sell off tranches to investors. TRRs seek maximum returns but they lack the large balance sheets of TRPs. A TRS allows a TRR to synthetically generate higher returns using leverage, while avoiding the transaction and administrative costs associated with buying the assets or entering into repo transactions. The exchange of cash flows and risks are explained below: Total Return Payer (TRP): - Owns reference asset(s) - Has lower cost financing - Pays total return of asset(s) - Receives LIBOR +/- spread - Receives payments to offset any capital losses - Takes on interest rate risk - Transfers away asset return risk Total Return Receiver (TRR): - Does not own reference asset(s) - has a weaker balance sheet or uses balance sheet leverage - Has higher cost financing - Receives total return of asset(s) - Pays LIBOR +/- spread - Pays for any capital losses - Takes on asset return risk - Takes on interest rate risk TRS deals are typically structured with a notional amount, start date, end date, and periodic dates where asset returns are swapped for cash flows. The notional amount is defined at the start as the market value of asset(s) on the Return Leg. The parties establish a regular payment calendar for transfer of net returns. For example, the parties may set a quarterly payment calendar defined by LIBOR coupon dates. On those dates, the Total Return Payer (or a specified third party) will mark-to-market the capital appreciation/depreciation and accumulated cash flows of the Return Leg asset(s). The Total Return Receiver will calculate the required coupon consisting of LIBOR +/- a spread. Value of the reference asset(s) is determined on a periodic basis by mark-to-market using dealer quotations, independent pricing data, market surveys, or independent valuation. The parties will then exchange the net difference between the value of the two legs. At expiration date of the TRS, the parties will exchange the remainder of net returns and continue on separately as if nothing had happened. Where the reference asset is a security with a risk of default, such as a corporate bond or basket of bonds, the TRS agreement will normally set forth various payments and valuation steps required upon default. The TRS agreement may simply terminate, and the parties exchange cash payments according to the value of the defaulted assets. There may be an exchange of cash or physical delivery of the defaulted bonds. The Total Return Payer may substitute another security for the defaulted one and continue the TRS arrangement. A lump sum payment may be due. The Total Return Receiver may have the option to purchase the defaulted loan or bond from the Total Return Payer and then deal directly with the defaulted loan obligor. There are many potential variations, making a TRS attractive for parties focused on specific unique asset returns. Total Return Swap Examples In a Bank Loan TRS, a large bank such as Barclays (the Total Return Payer) purchases a loan. It then enters into a TRS with an investor (the Total Return Receiver). The bank pays all the interest and realized capital gains to the Seller, minus a "funding charge" (akin to an access fee to the bank's balance sheet). The investor pays LIBOR plus a spread, plus any realized capital losses to the bank. Initial collateral (the "haircut" or "Independent Amount" in swap language) of between 15% and 80% is paid to the bank by the investor at the inception of the TRS. The bank holds this collateral in a separate account and pays the investor periodic interest at the Fed Funds Effective Rate.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 215/Wednesday, November 6
    Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2019 / Notices 59849 respect to this action, see the each participant will speak, and the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE application for license amendment time allotted for each presentation. COMMISSION dated October 23, 2019. A written summary of the hearing will [Release No. 34–87434; File No. SR– Attorney for licensee: General be compiled, and such summary will be NYSEArca–2019–12] Counsel, Tennessee Valley Authority, made available, upon written request to 400 West Summit Hill Drive, 6A West OPIC’s Corporate Secretary, at the cost Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Tower, Knoxville, TN 37902. of reproduction. Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of NRC Branch Chief: Undine Shoop. Amendment No. 2 and Order Granting Written summaries of the projects to Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day be presented at the December 11, 2019, of October 2019. Rule Change, as Modified by Board meeting will be posted on OPIC’s Amendment No. 2, To List and Trade For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. website. Kimberly J. Green, Shares of the iShares Commodity Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Curve Carry Strategy ETF Under NYSE Branch II–2, Division of Operating Reactor Information on the hearing may be Arca Rule 8.600–E obtained from Catherine F. I. Andrade at Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor I. Introduction Regulation. (202) 336–8768, via facsimile at (202) [FR Doc. 2019–24198 Filed 11–5–19; 8:45 am] 408–0297, or via email at On March 1, 2019, NYSE Arca, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Return Swap • Exchange the Total Economic Performance of a Specific Asset for Another Cash Flow
    Total return swap • Exchange the total economic performance of a specific asset for another cash flow. total return of asset Total return Total return payer receiver LIBOR + Y bp Total return comprises the sum of interests, fees and any change-in-value payments with respect to the reference asset. A commercial bank can hedge all credit risk on a loan it has originated. The counterparty can gain access to the loan on an off-balance sheet basis, without bearing the cost of originating, buying and administering the loan. 1 The payments received by the total return receiver are: 1. The coupon c of the bond (if there were one since the last payment date Ti − 1) + 2. The price appreciation ( C ( T i ) − C ( T i − 1 ) ) of the underlying bond C since the last payment (if there were only). 3. The recovery value of the bond (if there were default). The payments made by the total return receiver are: 1. A regular fee of LIBOR + sTRS + 2. The price depreciation ( C ( T i − 1 ) − C ( T i ) ) of bond C since the last payment (if there were only). 3. The par value of the bond C if there were a default in the meantime). The coupon payments are netted and swap’s termination date is earlier than bond’s maturity. 2 Some essential features 1. The receiver is synthetically long the reference asset without having to fund the investment up front. He has almost the same payoff stream as if he had invested in risky bond directly and funded this investment at LIBOR + sTRS.
    [Show full text]
  • Credit Derivatives
    3 Credit Derivatives CHAPTER 7 Credit derivatives Collaterized debt obligation Credit default swap Credit spread options Credit linked notes Risks in credit derivatives Credit Derivatives •A credit derivative is a financial instrument whose value is determined by the default risk of the principal asset. •Financial assets like forward, options and swaps form a part of Credit derivatives •Borrowers can default and the lender will need protection against such default and in reality, a credit derivative is a way to insure such losses Credit Derivatives •Credit default swaps (CDS), total return swap, credit default swap options, collateralized debt obligations (CDO) and credit spread forwards are some examples of credit derivatives •The credit quality of the borrower as well as the third party plays an important role in determining the credit derivative’s value Credit Derivatives •Credit derivatives are fundamentally divided into two categories: funded credit derivatives and unfunded credit derivatives. •There is a contract between both the parties stating the responsibility of each party with regard to its payment without resorting to any asset class Credit Derivatives •The level of risk differs in different cases depending on the third party and a fee is decided based on the appropriate risk level by both the parties. •Financial assets like forward, options and swaps form a part of Credit derivatives •The price for these instruments changes with change in the credit risk of agents such as investors and government Credit derivatives Collaterized debt obligation Credit default swap Credit spread options Credit linked notes Risks in credit derivatives Collaterized Debt obligation •CDOs or Collateralized Debt Obligation are financial instruments that banks and other financial institutions use to repackage individual loans into a product sold to investors on the secondary market.
    [Show full text]
  • Commodity Index Traders and the Boom/Bust Cycle in Commodities Prices
    Page 2 Commodity Index Traders and the Boom/Bust Cycle in Commodities Prices David Frenk and Wallace Turbeville* ©Better Markets 2011 ABSTRACT Since 2005, the public has lived with high and volatile prices for basic energy and agricultural commodities. The public focus on this unprecedented commodity price volatility has been intense, because a large proportion of the cost of living borne by individuals and families in the U.S. (and around the globe) is represented by commodities- based costs, notably food, fuel, and clothing. Interestingly, as commodity prices have shown more price volatility, there has been an accompanying significant increase in the volume of commodities futures and swaps transactions, as well as commodities markets open interest. Moreover, Commodity Index Traders (“CITs”), a relatively new type of participant, now collectively make up the single largest group of non-commercial participants in commodities futures markets. These CITs, which represent giant institutional pools of capital, have at times been the single largest class of participant, outweighing bona fide hedgers (producers and consumers of commodities) and traditional “speculators,” who take short-term bi-directional bets and provide liquidity. Given both the size and the specific and largely homogeneous investment strategy of the CITs, many market observers have concluded that this group is most likely responsible for greatly disrupting price formation in commodities futures markets. Further, it has been posited that this distortion has directly led to
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Policy on Valuation Adjustments Global Capital Markets
    Global Consolidated Policy on Valuation Adjustments Consolidated Policy on Valuation Adjustments Global Capital Markets September 2008 Version Number 2.35 Dilan Abeyratne, Emilie Pons, William Lee, Scott Goswami, Jerry Shi Author(s) Release Date September lOth 2008 Page 1 of98 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY BARCLAYS LBEX-BARFID 0011765 Global Consolidated Policy on Valuation Adjustments Version Control ............................................................................................................................. 9 4.10.4 Updated Bid-Offer Delta: ABS Credit SpreadDelta................................................................ lO Commodities for YH. Bid offer delta and vega .................................................................................. 10 Updated Muni section ........................................................................................................................... 10 Updated Section 13 ............................................................................................................................... 10 Deleted Section 20 ................................................................................................................................ 10 Added EMG Bid offer and updated London rates for all traded migrated out oflens ....................... 10 Europe Rates update ............................................................................................................................. 10 Europe Rates update continue .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Merger Arbitrage Today Offering Consistency in Uncertain Markets a Differentiated Return Stream
    Ψ The Arbitrage Funds advised by water island capital Merger Arbitrage Today Offering Consistency in Uncertain Markets A Differentiated Return Stream In Times of Equity Market Stress Merger Arbitrage is a time-tested strategy that has historically provided returns 100% uncorrelated to broader swings in the market. During times of market stress, the Percentage of time strategy may provide an important source of diversification for an investor’s portfolio. Merger Arbitrage outperformed Stocks average return average return in months Stocks in months stocks are down in years stocks are down were down. 5% 3.29% Source: Morningstar; Date range: 1/1/10-12/31/19. 0% -0.25% -3.28% -5% -4.38% Merger Arbitrage Stocks Source: Morningstar. Date Range: 1/1/10-12/31/19. Past performance does not guarantee future results. “Merger Arbitrage” represented by HFRI Merger Arbitrage. “Stocks” represented by S&P 500. Index returns are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual performance. S&P 500 returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs, or expenses. Indices are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. Greater Levels of Volatility Because returns are closely tied to the outcome of specific, short-term events, rather -21% than overall market direction, volatility can offer attractive entry points. It can also lead to the re-pricing of risk, allowing for greater return potential. Merger Arbitrage VIX five-year average relative to its historic performance has historically been better than Stocks when market volatility increases. average. sum of daily returns on days when the vix is above or below its average level VIX Avg/Historical Avg 120% 108% -20% 2019 100% -13% 2018 80% 40% -42% 2017 20% 8% 5% -17% 2016 0% -13% 2015 -20% -40% Source: CBOE; Water Island Capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Plan of Risky Total Return Swap to Bond Return Swap
    DEGREE PROJECT IN ENGINEERING PHYSICS, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2020 Migration plan of Risky Total Return Swap to Bond Return Swap LOUIS MAZIERE KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES Migration plan of Risky Total Return Swap to Bond Return Swap LOUIS MAZIERE Degree Projects in Financial Mathematics (30 ECTS credits) Degree Programme in Engineering Physics KTH Royal Institute of Technology year 2020 Supervisor at Murex: Pierre Moureaux and Sabine Farhat Supervisor at KTH: Boualem Djehiche Examiner at KTH: Boualem Djehiche TRITA-SCI-GRU 2020:030 MAT-E 2020:008 Royal Institute of Technology School of Engineering Sciences KTH SCI SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden URL: www.kth.se/sci 2 Abstract Since the 2008 crisis, the hedging instruments have gained popularity with financial institutions. This is the case of the total return swap that is used today by major institutions like Goldman Sachs or J.P. Morgan. Murex is a software provider for financial institutions. The company already had a total return swap product, the RTRS (for Risky Total Return Swap), but with the growing demand Murex decided to develop a new product, the BRS (Bond Return Swap). So now they have two bond total return swaps. This master thesis aims to analyze total return swap and highlight the improvement of the BRS. After a theoretical analysis of the total return swap, a test campaign is realized. For different types of bond and different configurations of total return swap, formulas are derived to be compared to the returned values. The results given by the RTRS are good on basic bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements Of
    Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements of CARGOJET INC. For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 (unaudited - expressed in millions of Canadian dollars) This page intentionally left blank CARGOJET INC. Condensed Consolidated Interim Balance Sheets As at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 (unaudited, in millions of Canadian dollars) September 30, December 31, Note 2018 2017 $ $ ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS Cash - 5.7 Trade and other receivables 42.6 40.1 Inventories 1.1 0.9 Prepaid expenses and deposits 10.3 5.8 Income taxes recoverable 0.1 0.1 Derivative financial instruments 16 1.0 1.8 55.1 54.4 NON-CURRENT ASSETS Property, plant and equipment 4, 6 650.7 514.7 Goodwill 46.4 46.4 Intangible assets 2.0 2.0 Deposits 3.3 5.7 Deferred income taxes 10 4.7 4.5 762.2 627.7 LIABILITIES CURRENT LIABILITIES Overdraft 2.4 - Trade and other payables 36.1 38.1 Finance leases 7 15.0 62.1 Provisions 8 1.4 0.1 Dividends payable 2.8 2.6 Derivative financial instruments 16 0.1 1.6 57.8 104.5 NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES Borrowings 6 268.3 124.5 Finance leases 7 128.0 99.1 Provisions 8 - 1.2 Convertible debentures 9 116.5 114.8 Deferred income taxes 10 25.4 18.5 Employees pension and option liability 5 14.7 10.5 610.7 473.1 EQUITY 151.5 154.6 762.2 627.7 The accompanying notes are an integral component of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.
    [Show full text]
  • HAP Nexus Hedge Fund Replication Trust
    Annual Report | December 31, 2015 HAP Nexus Hedge Fund Replication Trust Innovation is our capital. Make it yours. www.HorizonsETFs.com ALPHA BENCHMARK BETAPRO 87726 - HAP Nexus Hedge.indd 1 2016-03-04 3:57 PM Contents MANAGEMENT REPORT OF FUND PERFORMANCE Management Discussion of Fund Performance .....................1 Financial Highlights ...............................................6 Past Performance ..................................................9 Summary of Investment Portfolio . 11 MANAGER’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING ............13 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT. 14 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Statements of Financial Position ..................................15 Statements of Comprehensive Income ............................16 Statements of Changes in Financial Position .......................17 Statements of Cash Flows .........................................18 Schedule of Investments ..........................................19 Notes to Financial Statements ....................................21 87726 - HAP Nexus Hedge.indd 3 2016-03-04 3:57 PM Letter from the Co-CEO: The story for investors in 2015 was one of a return to volatility, especially in the North American markets. Canadian equities declined noticeably and in the U.S., the S&P 500® experienced its first 10% correction in over three years, only to rally to end the year with a modest loss. Additionally, the Canadian Dollar had its worst performing year relative to the U.S. Dollar since 2008 and we saw very marginal returns from the fixed income markets. For Horizons ETFs, this year could be called “The Year of the Active ETF,” since many of our actively managed equity and fixed income ETFs delivered strong relative returns. Portfolio managers who can identify sectors or individual securities with better relative returns can, and do, deliver attractive results, assuming they are not burdened with the high management fees that can plague many actively managed mutual funds.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Credit Derivatives. Credit Default Swap. Total Return Swap. Credit Forward
    FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT AND DERIVATIVES [235221] 1. Credit Derivatives. Credit Default Swap. Total Return Swap. Credit Forward. Credit Options. Credit forward Credit forward contracts provide symmetrical payoffs. The payoff at maturity of the forward contract may is determined by the following formula: [spread at maturity – contracted spread] x notional capital x risk factor Binary credit options There are two types of binary options with predetermined payouts, based on credit rating. payout predetermined payout option premium Credit Quality default no default Figure 1. Binary option with predetermined payout payout Credit Rating B2 B1 Ba3 Ba2 Ba1 investment grade Figure 2. Binary option based on a credit rating 1 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT AND DERIVATIVES [235221] Credit Swaps Cash Payment if Credit risky Investment Credit Default Dealer Z assets protection (credit buyer protection (bank Y) seller) Total return Swap Premium Figure 3. Credit Default Swap with a Cash Payment Upon Default Credit risky Investment Credit LIBOR + spread Dealer Z assets protection (credit buyer protection (bank Y) seller) Total return Total return Figure 4. Credit Default Swap with a Periodic Payment Investor 1 Payment for a credit event associated Investor 2 Bond A with bond A Bond B Payment for a credit event associated with bond A 2 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT AND DERIVATIVES [235221] Figure 5. Reciprocal Credit Default Swap Total Return Swap Credit risky Investment Credit LIBOR + spread Investor Y assets protection (credit risk buyer buyer) (dealer Z) Total return Total return Figure 6. Total Return Credit Swap 3 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT AND DERIVATIVES [235221] Problem 1. Credit Forward Bank Y buys a credit spread forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizons Morningstar Hedge Fund Index ETF (HHF, HHF.A:TSX)
    Annual Report | December 31, 2015 Horizons Morningstar Hedge Fund Index ETF (HHF, HHF.A:TSX) Innovation is our capital. Make it yours. www.HorizonsETFs.com ALPHA BENCHMARK BETAPRO 87725 - Horizons HHF.indd 1 2016-03-04 3:54 PM Contents MANAGEMENT REPORT OF FUND PERFORMANCE Management Discussion of Fund Performance ..........................................1 Financial Highlights ....................................................................7 Past Performance ......................................................................10 Summary of Investment Portfolio of Horizons Morningstar Hedge Fund Index ETF .......12 Summary of Investment Portfolio of HAP Nexus Hedge Fund Replication Trust ..........13 MANAGER’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING .................................15 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT. .16 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Statements of Financial Position .......................................................17 Statements of Comprehensive Income .................................................18 Statements of Changes in Financial Position ............................................19 Statements of Cash Flows ..............................................................20 Schedule of Investments of Horizons Morningstar Hedge Fund Index ETF ...............21 Schedule of Investments of HAP Nexus Hedge Fund Replication Trust. 22 Notes to Financial Statements .........................................................24 87725 - Horizons HHF.indd 3 2016-03-04 3:54 PM Letter from the Co-CEO: The story for investors in 2015
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Alternative Investments
    A GUIDE TO ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS Learn the key terms to help you navigate this important segment of the financial services industry CIBC ASSET MANAGEMENT A guide to alternative investments The alternative investments space is a dynamic and rapidly evolving segment of the financial services industry. While alternative investments in the past have been principally the domain of institutional and accredited investors, this market segment is becoming increasingly available to a wider range of investors, through such vehicles as liquid alternatives. The landscape can be much easier to navigate once you become familiar with some common terms that are often used within this space. This guide contains explanations of various aspects of alternative investments, so keep it handy whenever you’re taking a closer look at different alternative investment strategies to include in an investment portfolio. What are alternative investments? Strategies that go beyond traditional investments (such as stocks, bonds or cash) Alternatives are investments in assets other than stocks, bonds and cash (for example, private equity, hedge funds, real assets, commodities, etc,) or investments using strategies that go beyond traditional ways of investing (such as long/short strategies) They provide more options for investors to increase their sources of returns, improve portfolio diversification and manage risk Investors can access alternatives more easily now through a fast-growing market segment known as liquid alternatives: alternative investments in the form of a mutual fund or exchange-traded fund, which offer the additional benefit of daily pricing Liquid alternatives provide investors with a flexible investment approach through exposure to various asset classes and strategies A GUIDE TO ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS | 2 CIBC ASSET MANAGEMENT A glossary of common terms Alpha The excess return an investment achieves over its benchmark is known as alpha.
    [Show full text]