Organized Crime Cases

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Organized Crime Cases Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel.: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org Digest of organized crime cases A compilation of cases with commentaries and lessons learned United Nations publication Printed in Austria Prepared in cooperation with The Government of Colombia The Government of Italy INTERPOL V.12-55802—October 2012—500 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna DIGEST OF ORGANIZED CRIME CASES A compilation of cases with commentaries and lessons learned UNITED NATIONS New York, 2012 © United Nations, October 2012. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. CONTENTS Acknowledgements . v Prefaces . vii Director-General/Executive Director of UNODC ................................................. vii Representative of Italy ......................................................................... viii Representative of Colombia .................................................................... x Secretary General of INTERPOL ............................................................... xi Summary . xiii Introduction . 1 I . Organized crime: its nature and criminalization . 5 A. Policies against organized crime. Organized crime offences. 5 B. Patterns of criminal organization ................................................... 13 C. Participation in an organized criminal group ........................................ 21 D. Liability of legal persons ........................................................... 26 E. Transnational offences and jurisdiction .............................................. 28 II . Investigation and prosecution . 33 A. Investigative and prosecutorial approaches to organized crime ......................... 33 B. Institutional setting: specialized entities for organized crime ........................... 39 C. Special investigative techniques ..................................................... 42 D. Other investigative techniques ...................................................... 47 E. Protection of witnesses ............................................................ 49 III . International law enforcement and judicial cooperation . 53 A. The international legal basis ........................................................ 53 B. Law enforcement cooperation ...................................................... 57 C. Institutional aspects ............................................................... 64 D. INTERPOL ...................................................................... 68 E. Joint investigative teams ........................................................... 72 F. Mutual legal assistance and extradition .............................................. 80 IV . Measures related to proceeds of crime . 87 A. Policy and legal basis .............................................................. 87 B. Extended confiscation. Forfeiture in rem. Non-conviction-based confiscation. 90 C. International cooperation in the execution of confiscation ............................. 96 iii V . Features of specific offences . 99 A. Maritime piracy .................................................................. 99 B. Firearms ......................................................................... 101 C. Environmental crime .............................................................. 105 D. Cultural property ................................................................. 108 E. Cybercrime ...................................................................... 110 VI . Prevention . 117 A. General issues .................................................................... 117 Annexes I. Country case abbreviations ............................................................. 121 II. List of cases divided by type of offences ................................................. 122 III. List of experts ........................................................................ 129 IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Digest of Organized Crime Cases was developed by the Implementation Support Section of the Organized Crime and Illicit Trafficking Branch, under the supervision of Mr. John Sandage, Director, Division for Treaty Affairs (DTA/OCB/ISS) of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. The Digest initiative as a whole was coordinated by Ms. Simonetta Grassi (UNODC). The Digest was drafted by Mr. Gioacchino Polimeni (Senior Legal Consultant), with the support of Ms. Simonetta Grassi (UNODC), Mr. Ricardo Peixoto (Legal Consultant), Ms. Livier Calderon (Intern), Ms. Dayan Faria (Intern), Mr. Sergio Rea (Intern) and Mr. Pascal Valette (Intern). Valuable contributions were provided by many UNODC staff members, in particular (in alphabetical order): Ms. Mounia Ben Hammou, Mr. Mike De Feo (consultant), Ms. Simone Heri, Ms. Tejal Jesrani, Ms. Karen Kramer, Mr. Aldo Lale-Demoz, Mr. Pierre Lapaque, Ms. Luz Elena Restrepo (consultant), Mr. Stephen Thurlow, Ms. Veronic Wright. The English version of the Digest was edited by Ms. Mary Albot (editor). Overall logistic and administrative support was provided by Ms. Hilda-Olivia Sarkissian. The development of the Digest would not have been possible without the financial and in-kind support of the Governments of Colombia and Italy, and Interpol. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime is thankful to the following persons and institutions, that have made the development of the Digest possible: Partners Colombia Ms. María Ángela Holguín, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Colombia; Major General José Roberto León Riaño, Director General, National Police of Colombia, President American Police Community—AMERIPOL; Major General Edgar Orlando Vale Mosquera, Deputy Director General, National Police of Colombia; Colonel Jorge Luis Vargas Valencia, Directorate of Police Intelligence, DIPOL, National Police of Colombia; Colonel Joaquin Fernando Buitrago Rueda, Chief of International Affairs Office, National Police of Colombia; Major Carlos Andrés Martínez Romero, Chief of International Affairs, Directorate of Police Intelligence, DIPOL. Italy Ministry of Foreign Affairs Directorate General for Development Cooperation Directorate General for Political Affairs and Security Ministry of Interior Ms. Annamaria Cancellieri, Minister of Interior, Republic of Italy; Prefect Francesco Cirillo, Deputy Director General of Public Security and Central Director of Criminal Police; Brigadier General Fabrizio Lisi, Director V of the International Police Cooperation Service, Guardia di Finanza; Police Brigadier General Filippo Dispenza, Head of the State Police Provincial Headquarters of Alessandria Police; Colonel Gennaro Capoluongo, Head of Cabinet of the International Police Cooperation Service; Police Lieutenant Colonel Claudio Martini, Head of the Bilateral and Multilateral Relations and Cooperation Agreements Section, International Police Cooperation Service; Ms. Vittoria Palmerini, Expert in Bilateral and Multilateral Relations and cooperation Agreements at the International Police Cooperation Service. Anti-Mafia National Directorate Mr. Giovanni Grasso, National Anti-mafia Prosecutor, Antimafia National Directorate; Mr. Giustino Sciacchitano, Deputy Anti-Mafia Prosecutor, General Prosecutor’s Office, Antimafia National Directorate. Interpol Mr. Ronald K. Noble, Secretary General Mr. Gianni Baldi, Assistant Director, Drug Control and Criminal Organizations Sub-Directorate. Experts The Digest is the result of a broad participatory process involving experts in the areas of law enforcement and prosecution from several regions of the world. Those experts contributed their time, imparted their expertise, shared their cases and experiences and brought boundless energy and enthusiasm to the process of elaborating the Digest. Most of them have also participated in at least one of the three expert group meetings held in Rome (Italy), Cartagena (Colombia) and Palermo (Italy). UNODC is profoundly grateful for their personal dedication and also for having remained committed to the initiative by providing feedback, commentary and suggestions throughout the process of developing the Digest and generating tangible and practical lessons learned. A full list of experts (in alphabetical order) appears in annex I. • Special thanks go to the interpreters and translators of the Italian Ministry of Interior and the National Police of Colombia who have assisted during the three meetings of experts and translated the Digest into other languages. VI PREFACE Director-General/Executive Director United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Over the past twenty years, the international community has been increasingly concerned about the threats posed by transnational organized crime. The United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (Palermo Convention) represents a first decisive response to these threats and provides a unique set of legal tools and a framework for concerted criminal policy. The sharing of the knowledge of practitioners is an effective tool that supports the implementation of the Palermo Convention, and in general, the criminal justice response to organized crime.
Recommended publications
  • Predictive POLICING the Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations
    Safety and Justice Program CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Safety and Justice Program View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that ad- dress the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for re- search quality and objectivity. Safety and Justice Program PREDICTIVE POLICING The Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations Walter L.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime and Victimology 1
    © Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION CHAPTER Crime and Victimology 1 by Ann Wolbert Burgess and Albert R. Roberts 44 LEARNING OBJECTIVES 44 KEY TERMS • Describe the victims of violence Costs of victimization • Outline the costs of criminal victimization Criminology • Describe the methods used to measure victimization Forensic victimology • Describe the origin of the crime victims’ movement National Crime Victimization Survey • Illustrate forensic victimology’s contribution to cold case analysis (NCVS) Victimology Introduction The unsettling reality regarding crime in the United States and Can­ ada today is that it is widespread, very often violent in nature, and it completely disregards all boundaries. There is no home, no com munity, and no region in North America that can consider itself to be safe from the risk of criminal assault. With recent estimates of the number of crime victims in the United States reaching as high as 38 million, it behooves all of us, both individually and collectively, to support emerg­ ing efforts aimed at two distinct but related areas: crime prevention and crime victim assistance. To be sure, averting criminal behavior altogether is the more preferable of the two. Given the improbability of accomplishing this in the immediate future, however, it becomes all the more urgent to be prepared to assist those who are victimized. Unprecedented numbers of victims are turning to victim assistance programs, mental health centers, domestic violence shelters, and victim compensation programs. Research, as well as experience, has shown that these individuals frequently suffer from significant emotional pain and trauma, physical injuries, and/or financial loss, and “second ary victims”—the relatives and close friends of victims—also endure both mental anguish and economic hardship.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive Models for Law Enforcement
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Final Report: Predictive Models for Law Enforcement Author(s): Donald E. Brown Document No.: 197634 Date Received: November 2002 Award Number: 1998-IJ-CX-K010 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. School of Engineering and Applied Science Department of system University ofVirginia 15 1 Engineer’s Way and Information P.O. Box 400747 Engineering CharlotteSMue,va 22!3044747 1?%3f NIJ Grant 984J-CX-KO10 Donald E. Brown Professor and Chair Department of Systems and Information Engineering PROPERTY OF National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) Box 6000 Rockvilie, MD 20849-6000 --+-@-’-- Approved By: Date: __ This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Introduction Predictive Methods for Law Enforcement Law enforcement agencies have increasingly acquired database management systems (DMBS) and geographic information systems (GIS) to support their law enforcement efforts. These agencies use such systems to monitor current crime activity and develop collaborative strategies with the local communities for combating crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Organizing New Series 62
    STOCKHOLM STUDIES IN SOCIOLOGY CRIMINAL ORGANIZING NEW SERIES 62 Criminal Organizing Studies in the sociology of organized crime Amir Rostami ©Amir Rostami, Stockholm University 2016 ISSN 0491-0885 ISBN 978-91-7649-364-9 Printed in Sweden by Holmbergs, Malmö 2016 Distributor: Department of Sociology, Stockholm University To my mother, for her sacri- fices, guidance, and faith. Contents Tables .......................................................................................................... 10 List of original studies .............................................................................. 11 Introduction ............................................................................................... 15 The outline of the dissertation ......................................................................... 20 Chapter 2. Comments on ethics, aims, methods, and data ............ 21 Aim and scope ..................................................................................................... 25 The data employed in the studies ................................................................... 26 The methods employed in the studies ............................................................ 29 Summary of the studies .................................................................................... 30 Chapter 3. What is organized crime: its definitions, consequences, and dimensions ......................................................................................... 32 Concepts and definitions in the study of organized
    [Show full text]
  • CONTROLLING ORGANIZED CRIME and CORRUPTION in the PUBLIC SECTOR by Edgardo Buscaglia and Jan Van Dijk*
    CONTROLLING ORGANIZED CRIME AND CORRUPTION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR by Edgardo Buscaglia and Jan van Dijk* Abstract Organized crime and corruption are shaped by the lack of strength of the control mechanisms of the State and civil society. The results presented in the present article attest to the links between the growth of organized crime and that of corruption in the public sector in a large number of countries. The two types of complex crime reinforce each other. To identify and isolate the influential factors behind the growth of corruption in the public sector and organized crime, the present article presents and analyses qualitative and quantitative information on a large sample of countries and territories representing world- wide diversity stratified by level of socio-economic development.** The study reported here aimed at identifying the institutional patterns that determine a country’s vulnerability to complex crimes. Being policy-oriented, the report includes a set of evidence-based policy recommendations. INTRODUCTION Corruption and organized crime are much more than an isolated criminal phenomenon. Theoretical and applied research have shown the inter- dependent links between the political, socio-economic, criminal justice and *Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Officer and Officer-in-Charge, Human Security Branch, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, respectively. The authors acknowledge the valuable contribution of Kleoniki Balta for her creative inputs in the definition of the variables and development of the database supporting the results presented here and for her capacity to coordinate the efforts of all the participating research assistants. The authors are also grateful to the following research assistants (in chronological order of participation), who were actively involved in collecting, processing and analysing the data: Vendulka Hubachkova, Nicole Maric, Irina Bazarya and Fabrizio Sarrica.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Reentry Guidebook
    MappingMapping forfor Community-BasedCommunity-Based PrisonerPrisoner ReentryReentry EffortsEfforts A Guidebook for Law Enforcement Agencies and Their Partners Mapping for Community-Based Prisoner Reentry Efforts A Guidebook for Law Enforcement Agencies and Their Partners by Nancy G. La Vigne The Police Foundation is a national, independent, nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting innovation and improvement in policing. Established in 1970, the foundation has conducted seminal research in police behavior, policy, and procedure, and works to transfer to local agencies the best information about practices for dealing effectively with a range of important police operational and administrative concerns. Motivating all of the foundation’s efforts is the goal of efficient, humane policing that operates within the framework of demo- cratic principles and the highest ideals of the nation. The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office) was created as a result of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. A component of the Justice Department, the COPS Office mission is to advance community policing as an effective strategy in communities’ efforts to improve public safety in jurisdictions of all sizes across the country. Community policing represents a shift from more traditional law enforcement in that it focuses on prevention of crime and the fear of crime on a very local basis. This project was supported by Cooperative Agreement #2005-CK-WX-K004 by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Points of view or opinions contained in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Decision Support Systems in Policing Decision Support Systems in Policing Don Casey Phillip Burrell London South Bank University, London Nick Sumner Metropolitan Police Service, London Abstract Decision Support Systems (DSS) are widely used in industry, finance and commerce to assist users with the large and rapidly growing amount of data that these institutions have to deal with. Police organisations have been slow to investigate the benefits that such systems can offer but this situation is changing. As well as seeking to improve operational performance, there are now pressing economic reasons for using I.T. systems to assist crime analysts and investigators. A short review of some of the more striking findings of psychological research in decision-mak- ing is followed by a survey of a selection of recent research into crime linkage and predictive policing using Arti- ficial Intelligence and some of the systems currently being used in Police jurisdictions. Keywords: decision support systems, crime analysis, predictive policing, crime linkage, artificial Intelligence The amount of data generated by, and available to, or- telligence (A.I) solutions, and more widely a discussion ganisations through their computer systems increases of expert decision-making. exponentially year on year and this phenomenon is accelerating. In order to deal with some of the prob- The major areas of application for systems are in pre- lems that this creates for decision-takers computer diction of crime “hot spots” and linkage of offences. programmes generically entitled “Decision Support The former is normally used in cases of “volume” crime Systems” (DSS) have been developed and are in use like burglary and vehicle offences while the latter is ap- throughout commerce, industry and finance (Turban, plied to more serious offences such as rape and hom- et al., 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • The Dialogue 3Rd Edition Joint Communiqué
    THE DIALOGUE 3RD EDITION JOINT COMMUNIQUÉ 1. The third edition of the INTERPOL Dialogue on an effective multilateral policing architecture against global threats “The Dialogue” took place at INTERPOL General Secretariat, Lyon, France, on 12-13 June 2019 with the participation of the following stakeholders: 2. AFRIPOL1 , the Arab Interior Ministers’ Council (AIMC), AMERIPOL, ASEANAPOL, EUROPOL, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency – Frontex, and the Gulf Cooperation Council-POL (GCCPOL), as member entities of the Dialogue, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)2 and UNODC, as observer entities. 3. The Dialogue member entities recalled the outcomes of the first and second meetings, respectively held in Singapore, March 2016, and Lyon, May 2017, where they stressed on the need to share information among law enforcement agencies, and for a greater mutual coordination of efforts in order to optimize a global response to evolving threats and minimize duplication between international and regional police stakeholders. 4. High-level exchanges during this third edition revolved around identifying ways to further align the Dialogue member entities’ counter-terrorism, organized crime and border security strategies, and to coordinate their operational endeavours in countering the cross-continental movement of foreign-terrorist fighters and drugs trafficking, as well as targeting criminal financing and assets as a common enabler of both terrorist and organized groups. 5. In achieving this, the Dialogue member entities focused on two areas of cooperation: a) design a continual and flexible mechanism to share strategic plans and align operational actions; and b) streamline the access to operational information to frontline police across regions either by relying on INTERPOL’s I-24/7 network as a preferred solution for linking regional police players, in accordance with their respective governance frameworks, or through interoperable systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Supply Reduction: an Overview of EU Policies and Measures
    ISSN 2315-1463 EMCDDA PAPERS Drug supply reduction: an overview of EU policies and measures Content: Abstract (p. 1) I Summary (p. 2) I Policy areas (p. 3) I The EU institutional system (p. 6) I Disrupting European drug markets (p. 8) I Targeting international drug trafficking (p. 11) I Conclusion (p. 16) I Abbreviations (p. 17) I References (p. 19) I Acknowledgements (p. 24) Abstract: The operation of illicit drug markets adopted to counteract these problems. is dependent on a chain of events with These include developing intelligence-led a global span. At each stage of the process, policing and improved border management from the production to the trafficking through and surveillance as well as legislative tools to to the consumption and the derived profits, target criminal profits. The EU is involved in the health and security of different countries a range of projects and initiatives around the is compromised by organised crime groups. world designed to reduce the supply of illicit drugs, including capacity-building initiatives This paper looks at EU policies and responses targeting smuggling routes and measures to to the production and trafficking of illicit support economic, legislative and monitoring drugs, set within the global context. It infrastructural development. considers the different strategic areas where these challenges are addressed, the EU structures involved, and some of the key measures currently being implemented by the EU and its international partners. Drug supply reduction issues arise in many Keywords drug policy policy areas, including illicit drug policy, drug supply reduction security, organised crime, and maritime and organised crime law enforcement regional cooperation policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice Analysis Course: Text
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. U.S. Department of Justice Law Enforcement Assistance Administration Criminal Justice Planning and Management Series Volume 2 Criminal Justice Analysis Course: Text !ii ,,° "" 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ r~I k ~ ~ • ~ ~ • ~h ¸ • ~ ~! ' ~'~i~ ~ ~, • ~ • , 11~ T¸p ~ I~ H ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................... I INTRODUCTION ............................................................. 3 II Purpose and Approach ........................................... 3 II. Audience ............................ ........................... 3 Ill. Themes ......................................................... 4 IV. Value of Analysis ........... •................................... 5 V. Roadmap ....................................................... 13 CHAPTER 1. PROBLEM SPECIFICATIONI ...................................... 19 I. How Problems are Specified .............. ; ..................... 19 II. Summary........................................................ 36 CHAPTER 2. DATA SYNTHESIS.............................................. 41 I• Measurement Accuracy ................................. ' ......... 44 II. Assessing Hypotheses .......................................... 49 Ill. Data Sources .................................................. 56 IV. Planning the Data Collection Effort .......................... 100 CHAPTER 3. DESCRIPTIVE METHODS................................. ...... 113 I • Measurement Level s ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Victim-Offender Overlap: Specifying the Role of Peer Groups
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: The Victim-Offender Overlap: Specifying the Role of Peer Groups Author(s): Jennifer N. Shaffer Document No.: 205126 Date Received: April 2004 Award Number: 2002-IJ-CX-0008 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Crime, Law, and Justice Program THE VICTIM-OFFENDER OVERLAP: SPECIFYING THE ROLE OF PEER GROUPS A Thesis in Crime, Law, and Justice by Jennifer N. Shaffer Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2003 The thesis of Jennifer N. Shaffer was reviewed and approved* by the following: Date of Signature R. Barry Ruback Professor of Crime, Law, & Justice and Sociology Thesis Advisor Chair of Committee D. Wayne Osgood Professor of Crime, Law, & Justice and Sociology Eric Silver Assistant Professor of Crime, Law, Justice, and Sociology John W. Graham Professor of Human Development and Family Studies Glenn Firebaugh Professor of Sociology Head of the Department of Sociology *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT Although research consistently indicates that adolescents’ peers are an important determinant of their involvement in crime as offenders, there has been little attention to whether adolescents’ peers influence adolescent victimization.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Study of Geospatial Algorithm Use in Crime Analysis and Predictive Policing
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Master's Theses (2009 -) Projects A Critical Study of Geospatial Algorithm Use in Crime Analysis and Predictive Policing Katy Weathington Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Weathington, Katy, "A Critical Study of Geospatial Algorithm Use in Crime Analysis and Predictive Policing" (2020). Master's Theses (2009 -). 588. https://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/588 A CRITICAL STUDY OF GEOSPATIAL ALGORITHM USE IN CRIME ANALYSIS AND PREDICTIVE POLICING by Katherine Weathington A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2020 ABSTRACT A CRITICAL STUDY OF GEOSPATIAL ALGORITHM USE IN CRIME ANALYSIS AND PREDICTIVE POLICING Katherine Weathington Marquette University, 2020 We examine in detail two geospatial analysis algorithms commonly used in predictive policing. The k-means clustering algorithm is used to partition input data into k clusters, while Kernel Density Estimation algorithms convert geospatial data into a 2-dimensional probability distribution function. Both algorithms serve unique roles in predictive policing, helping to inform the allocation of limited police resources. Through critical analysis of the k-means algorithm, we found that parameter choice can greatly impact how crime in a city is clustered, which therefor impacts how mental models of crime in the city are developed. Interviews with crime analysts who regularly used k-means revealed that parameters are overwhelmingly chosen arbitrarily. Similarly, KDE parameters greatly influence the resulting PDF, which are visualized in difficult to interpret heatmaps.
    [Show full text]