DOCSLIB.ORG

Georgianna Hanrahan, IRA, Et Al. V. Hewlett-Packard Company, Et Al. 05

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Georgianna Hanrahan, IRA, Et Al. V. Hewlett-Packard Company, Et Al. 05 Case 3:05-cv-02047-CRB Document 61-1 Filed 04/07/2006 Page 1 of 44 1 EDWARD F. HABER (pro hac vice) SHAPIRO HABER & URMY LLP 2 53 State Street Boston, MA 02109 3 Telephone: (617) 439-3939 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 GEORGIANNA HANRAHAN, IRA, Case No. 05-CV-02047 (CRB) 12 individually and on behalf of all others similarly sitatuted, 13 AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 53 State Street (617) 439-3939 439-3939 (617) 16 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY and Boston, MA 02109 MA Boston, CARLETON FIORINA, 17 Defendants. 18 SHAPIRO HABER & URMY LLP 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Amended Class Action Complaint Case No. 05-CV-02047 (CRB) -i- Case 3:05-cv-02047-CRB Document 61-1 Filed 04/07/2006 Page 2 of 44 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………….….-1- 3 JURISDICTION AND VENUE…………………………………………………………………….-2- 4 PARTIES……………………………………………………………………………………………-3- 5 SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS…………………………………………………………………-4- 6 7 Information Regarding Walter B. Hewlett………………………………………………………-4- 8 Walter B. Hewlett’s Negative Views Regarding the Merger and His Opposition to the Merger……………………………………………………………………………………….-6- 9 The Defendants’ Public Statements and Filings Regarding the 10 Merger On September 3, 2001 and Throughout the Class Period……………………………...-16- 11 The Stock Market Responded Negatively to the Proposed Merger……………………………-21- 12 The Defendants’ Omission of the Omitted Material Facts Caused 13 The September 3, 2001 Press Release and the Defendants’ Other Statements and Filings Regarding the Merger During the Class 14 Period to be Deceptive and Misleading………………………………………………………...-29- 15 Hewlett’s Opposition to the Merger is Publicly Disclosed by Hewlett on 53 State Street (617) 439-3939 439-3939 (617) 16 November 6, 2001……………………………………………………………………………...-32- Boston, MA 02109 MA Boston, 17 The Defendants Acted With Scienter, With the Intent to Defraud……………………………..-34- 18 CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS……………………………………………………………….-36- SHAPIRO HABER & URMY LLP 19 COUNT I 20 AGAINST DEFENDANTS HEWLETT-PACKARD AND FIORINA FOR VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 10(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT 21 AND RULE 10b-5 PROMULGATED THEREUNDER………………………………………….-38- 22 COUNT II 23 AGAINST DEFENDANT FIORINA PURSUANT TO SECTION 20(a) OF 24 THE EXCHANGE ACT…………………………………………………………………………...-40- 25 PRAYERS FOR RELIEF………………………………………………………………………….-41- 26 27 28 Amended Class Action Complaint Case No. 05-CV-02047 (CRB) -ii- Case 3:05-cv-02047-CRB Document 61-1 Filed 04/07/2006 Page 3 of 44 1 AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 2 3 Plaintiff, through its attorneys, alleges the following upon information and belief, except as 4 to the allegations which pertain to the Plaintiff and its counsel, which are alleged upon personal 5 knowledge. Plaintiff’s information and belief are based, inter alia, on the investigation made by and 6 through its attorneys, including but not limited to the review of documents filed with the Securities 7 and Exchange Commission; press releases and other public statements of the Defendants and others; 8 and published books. 9 10 11 INTRODUCTION 12 1. This is a federal securities class action which is brought by the Plaintiff against the 13 Defendants Hewlett-Packard Company (“Hewlett-Packard” or “HP”) and Carleton Fiorina 14 (“Fiorina”), the former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Hewlett- 15 Packard, on behalf of a class (the "Class") consisting of all persons or entities who sold the common 53 State Street (617) 439-3939 439-3939 (617) 16 Boston, MA 02109 MA Boston, 17 stock of Hewlett-Packard during the period September 4, 2001 through November 5, 2001, inclusive 18 (the “Class Period”). Plaintiff seeks to recover damages caused to the Class by Defendants’ SHAPIRO HABER & URMY LLP 19 violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 20 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. 21 2. This action arises as a result of the announcement by the Defendants on September 3, 22 23 2001 of the proposed merger of Hewlett-Packard with Compaq Computer Corporation (“Compaq”) 24 (the “Merger”) and subsequent public statements and public filings by the Defendants from 25 September 4, 2001 through November 5, 2001 regarding the Merger. Those statements by the 26 Defendants regarding the Merger were deceptive and misleading because they failed to disclose that 27 Walter B. Hewlett (“Hewlett”) was opposed to the Merger, as detailed herein. 28 Amended Class Action Complaint Case No. 05-CV-02047 (CRB) -1- Case 3:05-cv-02047-CRB Document 61-1 Filed 04/07/2006 Page 4 of 44 1 3. As detailed herein, Hewlett, who is the son of the co-founder of HP, the late William 2 R. Hewlett, and who, at all relevant times, was a Director of Hewlett-Packard, owns, controls the 3 voting rights of, and has substantial influence with respect to the voting of, hundreds of millions of 4 shares of Hewlett-Packard common stock. Hence, Hewlett’s opposition to the Merger significantly 5 6 decreased the likelihood that the Merger would be consummated. Accordingly, the Defendants’ 7 public statements and filings regarding the Merger, from September 3, 2001 through November 5, 8 2001, deceived and misled the marketplace as to the likelihood of the Merger being consummated, 9 by failing to disclose Hewlett’s opposition to the Merger, as detailed herein. 10 4. The Class Period begins on September 4, 2001, the first day of trading of Hewlett- 11 Packard stock after the Defendants announced the proposed Merger on September 3, 2001. The 12 13 Class Period ends on November 5, 2001, the last trading day of Hewlett-Packard stock prior to it 14 first becoming publicly known that Hewlett was opposed to the Merger, as a result of a press release 15 issued by Hewlett on November 6, 2001. 53 State Street (617) 439-3939 439-3939 (617) 16 Boston, MA 02109 MA Boston, 5. As demonstrated herein, the Defendants’ misleading and deceptive public statements 17 regarding the Merger on September 3, 2001 and throughout the Class Period significantly artificially 18 SHAPIRO HABER & URMY LLP decreased and deflated the price of HP stock throughout the Class Period. 19 20 21 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 22 6. This Court has jurisdiction of this action pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act 23 [15 U.S.C. §78aa], and 28 U.S.C. §§1331 and 1337. 24 7. This action arises under and pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act [15 25 U.S.C. §78j(b)], Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the SEC [17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5] and 26 27 Section 20 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C.S. §78t(a)]. 28 Amended Class Action Complaint Case No. 05-CV-02047 (CRB) -2- Case 3:05-cv-02047-CRB Document 61-1 Filed 04/07/2006 Page 5 of 44 1 8. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act and 28 2 U.S.C. §1391(b). The Defendants are located in this District and acts complained of herein occurred 3 in this District. 4 9. In connection with the acts alleged in this Complaint, Defendants, directly or 5 6 indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including, but not limited 7 to, the mails, interstate telephonic communications and the facilities of the New York Stock 8 Exchange, a national securities exchange. 9 10 PARTIES 11 10. Plaintiff Georgianna Hanrahan, IRA, (“Plaintiff”), is the IRA account of Georgianna 12 13 Hanrahan, a natural person who resides in Norwalk, Connecticut. As detailed in the Certification of 14 the Plaintiff, attached to the original complaint filed in this action, the Plaintiff sold 255 shares of 15 Hewlett-Packard common stock during the Class Period. The Plaintiff did not purchase any 53 State Street (617) 439-3939 439-3939 (617) 16 Boston, MA 02109 MA Boston, Hewlett-Packard common stock during the Class Period. 17 11. Defendant Hewlett-Packard is a Delaware corporation, with its headquarters in Palo 18 SHAPIRO HABER & URMY LLP Alto, California. It is located and does business throughout the United States and internationally, 19 20 including in this judicial district. 21 12. The Defendant Carleton Fiorina was, at all relevant times, Chairman of the Board of 22 Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Hewlett-Packard. On February 9, 2005, Fiorina was fired 23 as the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Hewlett-Packard. 24 13. The Defendants Hewlett-Packard and Fiorina are collectively referred to herein as the 25 “Defendants.” 26 27 28 Amended Class Action Complaint Case No. 05-CV-02047 (CRB) -3- Case 3:05-cv-02047-CRB Document 61-1 Filed 04/07/2006 Page 6 of 44 1 SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS 2 Information Regarding Walter B. Hewlett 3 14. Hewlett is the son of the late William R. Hewlett, a co-founder of Hewlett-Packard. 4 Prior to the Merger he had been a Director of HP for 14 years. As a result of his personal ownership 5 6 of HP shares; his relationship to and influence with persons who own or control the voting rights of 7 HP shares; and his positions with and influence with entities that own substantial numbers of HP 8 shares; Hewlett’s negative views regarding the Merger and his opposition to the Merger, had they 9 been disclosed during the Class Period, would have had a significant impact on the marketplace’s 10 judgment, during the Class Period, as to the likelihood of the Merger being consummated. 11 15. At all times relevant hereto Hewlett personally owned or had the sole power to vote 12 13 or to direct the vote of 439,334 shares of HP stock.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Firmenhistorien Zur Rechentechnik
    Biographien von Herstellern zur Rechentechnik in der rechentechnischen Sammlung des Geodätischen Instituts der Leibniz Universität Hannover In alphabetischer Reihenfolge Inhalte ohne Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit von Rainer Heer 1 Ascota (Astra) VEB 1919 Mechaniker-Werkstatt von John E. Greve in Chemnitz, Schlossstraße 2, 1921 Gründung der Astra-Werke AG in Chemnitz, Herbertstraße 9, Eintragung in HR Blatt 8209, dann HRB 23, Vorstand: John Greve, erste Mustermaschine des Modells A mit Einfachtastatur, erste deutsche und eu- ropäische Zehnertastatur. 1922 Fertigungsverlagerung in die Reitbahnstraße 40 1923 Beginn der Serienfertigung Modell A, (produziert bis 1939 mit 1 451 Stück) 1924 Modell B (Addier- und Subtrahiermaschine), Weiterent wicklung Modell A - D mit elektrischem Antrieb, Stellenan- zeiger und Sprungwagen 1928 Steigerung der Belegschaft von 175 im Jahr 1923 auf 407 Mitarbeiter. Jahresprodukti- on: Modell A: 446 Stück, Modell B: 1 183 Stück, Modell C: 810 Stück, Modell D: 313 Stück. 1928 Duplexmaschine in verschiedener Ausstattung, ab 1938 als Klasse 3/Modell 320 bis 340 (Buchungsmaschine mit 1 Saldierwerk und 1 Duplexwerk) Bild 1: Fertigungsstätte Astra-Werke 1929 1928 Triplexmaschine in verschiedener Ausstattung: ab 1938 als Klasse 4/Modell 420 und 430 (3 Zählwerke) 1929 Inbetriebnahme der neuen Fertigungsstätte im Bauhausstil auf der Altchemnitzer Straße 41 (siehe Bild 1); neue Modelle der Pultmaschinen und der Symbol-Buchungsmaschine: (Modelle J, K, L) 1930 Multiplex - Buchungsautomat mit bis zu 16 Registern, 1938-41 Produktion
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum in Opposition to Hewlett-Packard Company's Motion to Quash Intel's Subpoena Duces Tecum
    ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ) In the Matter of ) ) DOCKET NO. 9341 INTEL. CORPORATION, ) a corporation ) PUBLIC ) .' ) MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO HEWLETT -PACKARD COMPANY'S MOTION TO QUASH INTEL'S SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM Intel Corporation ("Intel") submits this memorandum in opposition to Hewlett-Packard Company's ("HP") motion to quash Intel's subpoena duces tecum issued on March 11,2010 ("Subpoena"). HP's motion should be denied, and it should be ordered to comply with Intel's Subpoena, as narrowed by Intel's April 19,2010 letter. Intel's Subpoena seeks documents necessary to defend against Complaint Counsel's broad allegations and claimed relief. The Complaint alleges that Intel engaged in unfair business practices that maintained its monopoly over central processing units ("CPUs") and threatened to give it a monopoly over graphics processing units ("GPUs"). See CompI. iiii 2-28. Complaint Counsel's Interrogatory Answers state that it views HP, the world's largest manufacturer of personal computers, as a centerpiece of its case. See, e.g., Complaint Counsel's Resp. and Obj. to Respondent's First Set ofInterrogatories Nos. 7-8 (attached as Exhibit A). Complaint Counsel intends to call eight HP witnesses at trial on topics crossing virtually all of HP' s business lines, including its purchases ofCPUs for its commercial desktop, commercial notebook, and server businesses. See Complaint Counsel's May 5, 2010 Revised Preliminary Witness List (attached as Exhibit B). Complaint Counsel may also call HP witnesses on other topics, including its PUBLIC FTC Docket No. 9341 Memorandum in Opposition to Hewlett-Packard Company's Motion to Quash Intel's Subpoena Duces Tecum USIDOCS 7544743\'1 assessment and purchases of GPUs and chipsets and evaluation of compilers, benchmarks, interface standards, and standard-setting bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Buy a Computer? How, Read the Instructions and Buy Books in Bookstores
    Thanks for picking up this book. I appreciate the lift. occasionally bump into a paragraph that’s outdated or otherwise ill-advised, for which I humbly apologize, o master. Unique I’m your slave. Phone me anytime at 603-666-6644 to whip This is the only book whose author is weird enough to try to me into improving. I’m all ears, to improve my tongue. reveal everything important about computers — and also tricky living — all in one book. You can learn part of this info Come visit yourself, without this book, by just asking weird friends & When you visit New Hampshire, drop in & use my library, experimenting & sloshing through the Internet’s drivel, but free, anytime, day or night! In case I’m having an orgy with my 50 reading this book will save you lots of time and teach you tricks computers, phone first to pick a time when we’re cooled down. you can’t find elsewhere. You can also call the author’s cell Visit SecretFun.com. It reveals any hot news about us, gives phone, 603-666-6644, for free help, day or night. He’s usually you useful links, and lets you read parts of this book online, free. available. He’s me. Go ahead: bug me now! I read all email sent to [email protected]. I guarantee to Earlier editions were rated “the best,” praised by reply, but just by phone, so then phone me at 603-666-6644. The New York Times and thousands of other major newspapers, magazines, and gurus worldwide, in many countries; but this Mail the coupon 33rd edition is even better! It adds the world’s newest Mail us the coupon on this book’s last page.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies
    Volume 19, Number 1 Print ISSN: 1078-4950 Online ISSN: 1532-5822 JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY FOR CASE STUDIES Editors Inge Nickerson, Barry University Charles Rarick, Purdue University, Calumet The Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies is owned and published by Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc. Editorial content is under the control of the Allied Academies, Inc., a non-profit association of scholars, whose purpose is to support and encourage research and the sharing and exchange of ideas and insights throughout the world. Page ii Authors execute a publication permission agreement and assume all liabilities. Neither Jordan Whitney Enterprises nor Allied Academies is responsible for the content of the individual manuscripts. Any omissions or errors are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of manuscripts for publication from among those submitted for consideration. The Publishers accept final manuscripts in digital form and make adjustments solely for the purposes of pagination and organization. The Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies is owned and published by Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc, 51 Blake Drive, Arden, NC 28704, USA. Those interested in communicating with the Journal, should contact the Executive Director of the Allied Academies at [email protected]. Copyright 2013 by Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc, Arden NC, USA Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, Volume 19, Number1, 2013 Page iii EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS Irfan Ahmed Devi Akella Sam Houston State University Albany State University Huntsville, Texas Albany, Georgia Charlotte Allen Thomas T. Amlie Stephen F. Austin State University Penn State University - Harrisburg Nacogdoches, Texas Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Ismet Anitsal Kavous Ardalan Tennessee Tech University Marist College Cookeville, Tennessee Poughkeepsie, New York Joe Ballenger Lisa Berardino Stephen F.
    [Show full text]
  • Hewlett-Packard's Secret Surveillance of Directors and Journalists
    For the exclusive use of C. Luong, 2016. NA0050 Unauthorized Disclosure: Hewlett- Packard’s Secret Surveillance of Directors and Journalists Anne T. Lawrence, San Jose State University Randall D. Harris, California State University, Stanislaus Sally Baack, San Francisco State University n September 28, 2006, members of Congress, their staffs, reporters, prospec- tive witnesses, and the curious public packed the wood-paneled hearing room Oof the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The subject of the day’s hearing, called by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, was “Hewlett-Packard’s Pretexting Scandal.” 1 At issue were methods the technology firm had used to investigate the unauthorized disclosure of nonpublic information to the press by members of its board of directors. Hewlett-Packard (HP) apparently had hired investi- gators who had used a technique known as pretexting—calling the phone company and posing as someone else in order to obtain that person’s records. Newsweek had summed up the situation in a cover story published ten days earlier: “Lying, spying, name-call- ing, finger-pointing—all of it is a tragicomedy that Shakespeare might’ve penned if he had gotten an MBA.” 2 Hewlett-Packard and its board chairman, Patricia Dunn, had initially defended the company’s investigation of directors and journalists, saying aggressive efforts to ferret out the source of leaks were fully justified. But in the past few weeks, the situation had begun to spin out of control as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the California Attorney General had opened probes into the company’s actions.3 Now, nearly two dozen of HP’s top executives, directors, lawyers, and investigators—includ- ing the company’s CEO Mark Hurd—had been called before Congress to account for their firm’s alleged out-of-bounds behavior and to explain what they intended to do about it.
    [Show full text]
  • =Ggy??Enduring: Character He11 Avigat Gyrcrscqpes Have Dfkalmost a C&My to Gu* &Bps, Aivpkznes A&Mwag%Lrosaqpe~Th@~Ni~Wsm@Ofan
    Cort Van Renssetaer 501 Partola RL #8128 Portola Vaky, CA 94028 Hewlett-Packard d Our com~an?'s=ggy??enduring: character he11 avigat Gyrcrscqpes have dfkalmost a c&my to gu* &Bps, aivpkznes a&MWAg%lrosaqpe~th@~ni~WsM@ofan Bnraerauks$l with theftwe mouePnenX of apidlagjk%mkk an amlagow mu, Pstmd'bl.17;ng dtQWguicdRs the rnpp~ngas we bM Earxd and &ptto~&utiora,of~admakrkrsts. F'hancmmts JRttertofwuehdders IntmdudiontoEasays Illlmaion wand-- cslstomer~on the status QUO New hhkb3 Corporatea- Yesr in Review F'hancmStatements OPBcers 49 EJhareholder Mdon M) Corporate~on inside back cover HP Computer Museum www.hpmuseum.net For research and education purposes only. BEWLETT-PACKARDCOMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES Financial Highlights Computer r,Museun. ] Unawlitsd For the years ended October 31 In millions except per share amounts and employees 19% 1994 Increase Total orders $32,510 $25,350 28% Net revenue $31,519 $24,991 26% Earnings from operations $ 3,568 $ 2,549 40% Net earnings $ 2,433 $ 1,599 52% Net earnings per share, restated for 1995 stock split $ 4.63 $ 3.07 51% Return on assets 1O.OO/O 8.2% Return on average equity 22.3% 17.3% At year-end: Shares outstandmg 51 0 510 Employees 102,300 98,400 Return on Average Net Earnings Per Share* Shareholders' Equity In dollars Percent 1EPS W ROE B EPS including effect of .ROE including effect of accounting change accounting change *%stated for 1995stock split To Our Shareholders Nineteen ninety-five was a great year for Hewlett-Packard. We increased net earnings by more than 50 percent over 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Carly Fiorina, HP Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
    Hewlett-Packard Company 3000 Hanover Street Mail Stop 1048 news Palo Alto, CA 94304 www.hp.com Editorial Contacts: PRGP80 HP Reports Q3 2002 Results Tim Marklein, HP +1 650 236 4525 [email protected] S Revenue of $16.5 Billion S Rebeca Robboy, HP Pro Forma Gross Margin Increases +1 650 857 2064 to 25.7% [email protected] S Pro Forma EPS of $0.14 S Met All Quarterly Integration Milestones, Second-half Goals on Track S Affirms Current Q4 Consensus Estimates S GAAP EPS of ($0.67); Includes $1.6B Restructuring and $1.4B Other Merger- related Charges PALO ALTO, Calif., Aug. 27, 2002 -- HP (NYSE:HPQ) today reported financial results for its third fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2002. This is the company’s first earnings report that includes the merger transaction with Compaq Computer Corp., which was completed May 3, 2002. (Results and comparisons in this release are stated on a combined company basis and reflect Compaq’s prior fiscal quarter results as if combined with HP at the start of HP’s prior fiscal quarters.(1)) The company reported third quarter revenue of $16.5 billion, compared to $18.2 billion on a combined company basis in the prior quarter. Sequentially, combined company revenue declined 9%, while pro forma gross margin increased from 25.5% to 25.7%. Pro forma operating expenses were up sequentially from 21.0% to 22.5% of net revenue, reflecting normal seasonality and merger-related sales training and product rollouts. Operating expenses were down 10% year over year, equivalent to $400 million on an absolute dollar basis.
    [Show full text]
  • WHY CARLY's BIG BET IS FAILING Carol J Loomis
    WHY CARLY'S BIG BET IS FAILING Carol J Loomis. Fortune. New York: Feb 7, 2005.Vol.151, Iss. 3; pg. 50, 10 pgs » Jump to full text » Translate document into: Select language » More Like This - Find similar documents Subjects: Chief executive officers, Acquisitions & mergers, Corporate profiles, Computer industry, Personal profiles, Stock prices, Market shares Classification Codes 9190 United States, 9110 Company specific, 2330 Acquisitions & mergers, 2120 Chief executive officers, 9160 Biographical, 8651 Computer industry, 3400 Investment analysis & personal finance Locations: United States, US People: Fiorina, Carleton S Companies: Hewlett-Packard Co(Ticker:HWP , Sic:334111 , 334119 , 334611 , 511210 , Duns:00-912-2532 ) Author(s): Carol J Loomis Document types: Cover Story Publication title: Fortune. New York: Feb 7, 2005. Vol. 151, Iss. 3; pg. 50, 10 pgs Source type: Periodical ISSN/ISBN: 00158259 ProQuest document ID: 786223571 Text Word Count 6652 Document URL: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=786223571&sid=2&Fmt=3&clientId=4676&RQT=309&VName=PQD Abstract (Document Summary) Buying Compaq hasn't paid off for Hewlett-Packard's investors. HP CEO Carly Fiorina concedes that neither the stock nor profits are where they should be. But that's not because HP's acquisition of Compaq was wrongheaded, she says. It is instead, she claims, the result of a more extended downturn in IT spending than many expected and of weaknesses in "execution" that she is driving to fix. Fiorina sees HP today as a well-provisioned, intensely global, end-to-end corporation. Her pride, which she is not short of, is bound up with somehow making this company work, even if not by the definition detailed in the merger proxy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Holistic Framework for Transitional Management
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2014 A Holistic Framework for Transitional Management Ahmed Elattar University of Central Florida Part of the Industrial Engineering Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Elattar, Ahmed, "A Holistic Framework for Transitional Management" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 4618. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/4618 A HOLISTIC FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSITIONAL MANAGEMENT by AHMED ASHRAF ELATTAR B.S. The George Washington University, 2005 M.S. The George Washington University, 2010 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2014 Major Professor: Luis Rabelo ABSTRACT For all business organizations, there comes a time when a change must take place within their eco-system. It consumes a great deal of thought and planning to ensure that the right decision is made as it could alter the entire course of their business for a number of years to come. This change may appear in the form of a brilliant CEO reaching the age of retirement, or an unsuccessful Managing Director being asked to leave before fulfilling the term of her contract.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Account relationships vs. Asset-management group, 134 geographic territories, 165 Assignments and roles, 178 Accountability, 154, 187–188 AT&T Capital Accounts receivable, 116, 168 actions after sale of, 83–84 Achievement vs. plan, 156 growth of, 65 Adapt or die lesson, 161 origins of, 64 Aircraft fi nancing,http://www.pbookshop.com 56–57 SMB space investment, 117 Alcatel Lucent, 67 AT&T Capital Group, 2, 3–4 Allen, Bob, 186 AT&T Credit Co. Allen, Mel, 1–2 access to capital, 60 Ambiguity, 128 business purpose of, 56 American Transtech,COPYRIGHTED 5 credit MATERIAL card business, 61 Argentina, 109 development of, 57–58 Army Reserves, 37–38 enthusiasm at, 55 Asset management, 164, 165, Rothman start at, 53 166 sale of, 67–68 Asset redeployment, 177 SMB space, 116 205 index AT&T Credit Co. experience NCR, 66–67 AT&T Capital, 64, 69 NCR Credit Corp., 66–67 AT&T Capital growth, 65 networking, 63 AT&T Capital origins, 64 New York Times, 56–57 AT&T Capital sale, 69 organization reporting, 60 AT&T Credit Co. Paul Gustavson, 58 development, 57–58 personal relationships vs. due AT&T Universal, 61 diligence, 63 access to capital, 60 promotion, 60 aircraft fi nancing, 56–57 sale of AT&T Credit Co., Alcatel Lucent, 67 67–68 Alex Mandl, 64 Tom Wajnert, 56, 59–60, back problems, 58–59 62–63, 64 blended multiple, 65–66 AT&T Credit Corp, 3 business model, 58 AT&T divestiture of NCR, business purpose of, 56 66–67 company name change, 67 AT&T Universal, 61 credit card business, 61 Attrition, 168 divestiture of NCR, 66–67 Australia, 47, 104, 109, 175,
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisition Ofelectronic Commerce Capability: the Cases Ofcompaq and Dell in Sweden
    Acquisition ofElectronic Commerce Capability: The Cases ofCompaq and Dell in Sweden Michael Kaplan AKADEMISK AVHANDLING Som for avlaggande av ekonomie doktorsexamen vid Hal1delshogskolan i Stoclffiolm framlaggs for offentlig granskning fredagen den 3 maj 2002, kl10.15, i sal Ruben, Handelsll0gskolan, Saltmatargatan 13-17 Acquisition ofElectronic COll1ll1erce Capability: The Cases ofCOll1paq and Dell in Sweden ,,~ STOCKHOLM SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS ~.~~~.~ EFI, THE ECONOMIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE EFIMission EFI, the Economic Research Institute at the Stockholm School ofEconomics, is a scientific institution which works independently ofeconomic, political and sectional interests. It conducts theoretical and empirical research in management and economic sciences, including selected related disciplines. The Institute encourages and assists in the publication and distribution ofits research findings and is also involved in the doctoral education at the Stockholnl School ofEconomics. EFI selects its projects based on the need for theoretical or practical development ofa research donlain, on methodological interests, and on the generality ofa problem. Research Organization The research activities are organized in twenty Research Centers within eight Research Areas. Center Directors are professors at the Stockholm School of Economics. ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT Management and Organisation; (A) ProfSven-Erik Sjostrand Center for Ethics and Economics; (CEE) Adj ProfHans deGeer Center for Entrepreneurship and Business Creation; (E) ProfCarin Holmquist Public
    [Show full text]
  • Hewlett-Packard and Its Succession Crises
    FOLLOW THE LEADER: HEWLETT-PACKARD AND ITS SUCCESSION CRISES Sari Baldauf put down the telephone and leaned back in amazement into her hotel suite's plush sofa to try to register what she had just heard. She always looked forward each time she took the long journey from Helsinki to Palo Alto for meetings of the Hewlett-Packard Company (hereafter “HP”) Board of Directors. But this time, at the beginning of August, 2010, what confronted the Board was a particularly ticklish confrontation with CEO Mark Hurd himself, one that she had never before had to encounter during her tenure on the Executive Board at Nokia. Hurd had been accused of sexual harassment by a former HP marketing contractor (and B-film actress), Jodie Fisher. What's more, the ensuing internal investigation had shown that several expense reports from Hurd's office from the period of the alleged relationship were fraudulent, with an amount in dispute of up to $20,000. And now the CEO had pre-empted everything by reaching a private settlement with Fisher (via her attorney, the notorious Gloria Allred) just the previous day. So had Baldauf come all the way to Southern California for nothing? Of course not! What about the “The HP Way”? Sari Baldauf knew full well that the lingering influence of founders William Hewlett (1913-2001) and David Packard (1912-1996) meant that HP had always been more than just another IT equipment company. That “HP Way” embodied the precepts upon which they intended that their company's operations would always be based, as set out in five axioms: 1.
    [Show full text]