DOCSLIB.ORG

Grade 10 TERMS 2 and 3 Transformations in Southern Africa After 1750 • No Country Or State Called South Africa Until 1910

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Grade 10 TERMS 2 and 3 Transformations in Southern Africa After 1750 • No Country Or State Called South Africa Until 1910 Grade 10 TERMS 2 AND 3 Transformations in southern Africa after 1750 • No country or state called South Africa until 1910. • A Dutch colony was established in the Cape in 1652. By 1750, Dutch colonists and settlers had What was moved northwards and eastwards from Cape Town. • In the dry northern and western regions of the South Africa Cape lived Khoi herders and San hunter-gatherers. like in 1750? • The Nguni had settled between the coast in the Eastern Cape and the Drakensberg Mountains. • The Khoi had become part of the Xhosa chiefdoms between the Kei and Keiskama Rivers. Political changes from 1750 to 1820 Expansion of southern Tswana chiefdoms • Twsana Chiefdoms lived between the Vaal River and the Kalahari Desert . • They were the Barolong, Bafokeng, Bahurutshe, Bakgatla and Bakwena. • During this time there was increasing tension between these groups. • 4 possible causes : 1 :environmental - high rainfall made huge yields of maize and more grazing so the Tswana kingdom grew. Then rainfall dropped so food shortages caused land competition. • 2: Increased trade - between the Tswana and other regions. Some chiefs became very wealthy as they opened trade routes with Khoi in the Cape. • 3: Cattle raids from the Khoi and San communities who had been pushed out by the Cape Colony, affected Tswana chiefdoms. • The Bahurutshe resided near what is today known as Tshwane (or Pretoria) and were the most powerful Tswana chiefdom. Political changes from 1750 to 1820 Rise of the Ndwandwe under Zwide • Chiefdoms expanded between Drakensberg Mountains and Indian Ocean coast. The Ndwandwe, Mthethwa and Ngwane were the most powerful chiefdoms. • Mthethwa and Ndwandwe chiefdoms were powerful as they had control of the amabutho – groups of young soldiers and also hunted elephant in large regiments. • Conflict ensued - due to population growth, putting pressure on resources and due to drought, which led to more competition. • The Ndwandwe were most powerful under the leadership of Zwide, who ruled from 1805. Political changes from 1750 to 1820 Ndwandwe (continued) • In 1817, Zwide and his amabutho conquered Mthethwa, under the rule of Dingiswayo. This made the Ndwandwe the most powerful chiefdom in the region and they dominated the east until 1820. • In 1818 with Dingiswayo killed and his forces scattered, the Mthethwa were soon overcome by Shaka, founder of the Zulu state. He then destroyed the Ndwandwe at the Battle of Gqokli Hill . • 2 of Zwide's generals, Shoshangane and Mzilikazi, fled north and established kingdoms in present-day Mozambique and today’s Limpopo province and southern Zimbabwe, respectively. • Shaka then ruled the Mthethwa, then the Zulu state became the dominant power among the northern Nguni. Political changes from 1750 to 1820 • In 1795, the British seized control of the Cape from the Dutch East India Company. • Dutch farmers controlled much land in the west, affecting lives of the San hunter-gatherers and Khoi herders. • The Dutch killed livestock, took grazing land and indentured them as servants. • San survivors moved to the dry regions of the Great Karoo. • There were 9 Frontier Wars involving the Dutch, British, Xhosa and Khoi occurring over 100 years, as a result of colonial expansion. Political revolution between 1820 and 1835 Break up of Ndwandwe kingdom and rise of Zulu state and its consolidation under Dingane • The Zulu kingdom was first ruled by Shaka Zulu’s father and Shaka was in exile at living with the Mthethwa led by Dingiswayo. • When his father died, Shaka Zulu overthrew his brother and took the throne. • His rival chiefdom, the Ndwande, had defeated the Mthethwa in 1817. • Zulu tradition says that the Zulu fought the Ndandwe in 1819 as a retaliation and destroyed Zwide’s and his kingdom. Modern historians dispute this citing internal conflict as the cause for the disintegration of the Ndwandwe. • The internal conflict caused splinter groups out of the region, including Zwide, who moved northwards to modern day Swaziland. • The area they vacated was left open for Shaka to take control of. He ordered amambuthoto raids to expand the Zulu Kingdom. There are claims that these raids were violent, stating that 50 000 of Shaka’s men killed almost one million people. • Claim is disputed by some historians. They claim Shaka used peaceful diplomacy too. Non-threatening chiefdoms were accepted into Zulu Kingdom where they were offered protection in return for their loyalty. Political revolution between 1820 and 1835 Rise of Zulu kingdom (Cont’d) • Under Shaka Zulu, the Zulu kingdom became more militarised. • The Zulu society hierarchy - 3 tiers. 1st: The aristocracy and Zulu royal family,. 2nd: Amabutho. 3rd: Ordinary People who herded etc. • Zulus grew richer and more powerful through trade links with the Portuguese at Delagoa Bay and after 1824 with the British at Port Natal. • It is believed Shaka traded for firearms with the British and then he attacked the Ndwandwe again in 1826 with the help of traders from Port Natal. • The defeat of the Ndwandwe and capture of many of their cattle collapsed the kingdom. Many Ndwandwe became loyal to the Zulu kingdom. • After Ndwandwe defeat, Shaka’s unthinking violence started to divide the Zulus. • Zulu leaders plotted to overthrow him and in 1828 his assassination was ordered by his half-brothers, Mhlanga and Dingane. • Dingane became king. • He attacked the fort at Delagoa Bay when his control of the trade routes Shaka had set up were under threat. Political revolution between 1820 and 1835 The Rise of the Ndebele kingdom under Mzilikazi • The Zulu first defeated the Ndwandwe In 1819. Groups of Ndwandwe refugees from the violent upheavals were called the Khumalo and they moved into areas near the Vaal River, cattle raiding . • In 1826 more Ndwandwe escaped Zulu control to join these refugees, under Mzilikazi. These refugees were known as marauders or Ndebele. • The Ndebele caused disruption as they raided through the interior of southern Africa , attacking other chiefdoms in the 1820s and 1830s. Northwards to Venda, west as far as the Marico River, south as far as the Caledon River. • The Ndebele violent raids added to the Mfecane – the forced dispersal of this whole region. • 1832 Zulu leader, Dingane, ordered the attack of Mzilikazi’s chiefdom and the Ndebele retreated and settled in Bahurutshe territory. • By the mid-1830s, the Ndebele dominated across present-day Gauteng, Mpumalanga, North West and Limpopo. • In 1836, trek Boers from the Cape defeated the Ndebele and Mzilikazi took his people north to settle in present-day Zimbabwe. Political revolution between 1820 and 1835 Southern interior: role of Boer, Kora and Griqua raiders • Late 1800’s British colonial troops joined Boer raids , capturing San people and forcing them into labour. • Kora raiders were groups of Tswana, Khoi and San who lost their land and livestock and also runaway slaves and deserters from the Cape Colony. During raids on settler farms, they stole guns, livestock and horses. • The Griqua were Khoi and mixed descent herders. Lived in Namaqualand and near Gariep Orange River. Some Griqua raided settler farms areas in the interior throughout the 1820s, others settled on mission stations in present-day Free State, and Northern Cape. Emergence of Sotho kingdom under Moshoeshoe and his relations with his neighbours • The Caledon Valley ( border of Lesotho and the Free State) was destabilised by Boer, Griqua and Kora raids. • Bamokotedi, a Sotho community led by Moshoeshoe joined other Sesotho people to defend against raids. • The Sotho kingdom was made up of many smaller chiefdoms. Moshoeshoe used diplomacy to gain alliances, not force. Bought guns and horses from traders who came from the Cape Colony, he had a well protected kingdom. • He welcomed people from different cultural backgrounds into his kingdom, allowed to keep own customs, cultures and language but pay tribute to Moshoeshoe. • He also welcomed missionaries and was therefore able relate well with the Cape Colony. Political revolution between 1820 and 1835 Chiefdoms that developed during “Mfecane”; the Gaza, Swazi, Pedi, Mpondo and southern Tswana. • Gaza kingdom - group of Ndwandwe fled from a Zulu battle in 1819, under Shoshangane. • They settled in present-day Limpopo and into Mozambique. Very powerful chiefdom during the 1820s and 1830s. Their dominance has been ignored by South African historians. Mainly because the kingdom covered areas of Mozambique. Ivory trade through Delagoa Bay increased their power. • Shoshangane fought off Shaka and then also Dingane’s Zulu warriors plus Portuguese forces and successfully defended Delagoa Bay from an attempted takeover by Dingane’s forces. • The Swazi kingdom one of the small states, emerged after the Ndwandwe kingdom collapsed in 1826.They were controlled by Dlamini clans. • After Zwide defeated them in 1815 they fled to present-day Swaziland and established their chiefdom. • Their leader Sobhuza used marriage alliances to strengthen his power. After the death of Shaka in 1828, Sobhuza took over smaller Sotho and Nguni chiefdoms. In 1836 the Swazi defeated a raid by the Zulu. The Swazi remained a small organised kingdom. Political revolution between 1820 and 1835 Chiefdoms that developed during “Mfecane” (cont’d) • The Pedi lived in present-day Limpopo. With control over trade from the interior to Delagoa Bay in Mozambique. Beginning of 1800s the Pedi kingdom was broken up after a Ndwandwe invasion. They reformed under Sekwati. • Sekwati built a fortified hilltop settlement at Phiring. The Pedi were not centralised but still defeated the Swazi in the 1830s. • The Mpondo (or Pondo) - large kingdom, they lived in present-day KwaZulu- Natal and were largest power south of the Mzimkhulu River. A Xhosa sub- group. • KaNgqungqungqushe reigned from 1824. He welcomed missionaries in Pondoland in 1830. Defended themselves against waves of refugees His power increased because he represented groups who fought against Zulu rule.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 11010329.Pdf
    THE RISE, CONSOLIDATION AND DISINTEGRATION OF DLAMINI POWER IN SWAZILAND BETWEEN 1820 AND 1889. A study in the relationship of foreign affairs to internal political development. Philip Lewis Bonner. ProQuest Number: 11010329 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11010329 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT The Swazi kingdom grew out of the pressures associated with competition for trade and for the rich resources of Shiselweni. While centred on this area it acquired some of its characteristic features - notably a regimental system, and the dominance of a Dlamini aristocracy. Around 1815 the Swazi came under pressure from the South, and were forced to colonise the land lying north of the Lusutfu. Here they remained for some years a nation under arms, as they plundered local peoples, and were themselves swept about by the currents of the Mfecane. In time a more settled administration emerged, as the aristocracy spread out from the royal centres at Ezulwini, and this process accelerated under Mswati as he subdued recalcitrant chiefdoms, and restructured the regiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Variation Within the Iron Age of Southern Africa
    The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University 1 Dissertation presented for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in the Department of Archaeology. UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN Population variation within the Iron Age of southern AfricaTown An assessment using dental anthropological and cranio-mandibular metric techniques Cape of Kerryn Ashleigh Warren January 2013 University Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. RR Ackermann Co-supervisor: Dr. Simon Hall 2 Plagiarism Declaration I know the meaning of plagiarism and declare that all of the work in the dissertation (or thesis), save for that which is properly acknowledged, is my own. Signature: Town Cape of University 3 ABSTRACT Evidence for iron smelting, agriculture, elaborate pottery styles and increased sedentism appears abruptly in areas previously inhabited by hunter-gatherers and herders during the Early Iron Age (EIA) of southern Africa from around 250CE. Ceramic evidence connects these (cultural) populations to the second millennium Iron Age sites in eastern Botswana. This material culture differs from second millennium Late Iron Age (LIA) sites in South Africa which are attributed to migrations from east Africa and are connected, via the material culture, to modern Sotho-Tswana and Nguni speakers. Although the material culture of this period is well-studied, there is a gap in correlating Iron Age biological identity with the established cultural identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Early History of South Africa
    THE EARLY HISTORY OF SOUTH AFRICA EVOLUTION OF AFRICAN SOCIETIES . .3 SOUTH AFRICA: THE EARLY INHABITANTS . .5 THE KHOISAN . .6 The San (Bushmen) . .6 The Khoikhoi (Hottentots) . .8 BLACK SETTLEMENT . .9 THE NGUNI . .9 The Xhosa . .10 The Zulu . .11 The Ndebele . .12 The Swazi . .13 THE SOTHO . .13 The Western Sotho . .14 The Southern Sotho . .14 The Northern Sotho (Bapedi) . .14 THE VENDA . .15 THE MASHANGANA-TSONGA . .15 THE MFECANE/DIFAQANE (Total war) Dingiswayo . .16 Shaka . .16 Dingane . .18 Mzilikazi . .19 Soshangane . .20 Mmantatise . .21 Sikonyela . .21 Moshweshwe . .22 Consequences of the Mfecane/Difaqane . .23 Page 1 EUROPEAN INTERESTS The Portuguese . .24 The British . .24 The Dutch . .25 The French . .25 THE SLAVES . .22 THE TREKBOERS (MIGRATING FARMERS) . .27 EUROPEAN OCCUPATIONS OF THE CAPE British Occupation (1795 - 1803) . .29 Batavian rule 1803 - 1806 . .29 Second British Occupation: 1806 . .31 British Governors . .32 Slagtersnek Rebellion . .32 The British Settlers 1820 . .32 THE GREAT TREK Causes of the Great Trek . .34 Different Trek groups . .35 Trichardt and Van Rensburg . .35 Andries Hendrik Potgieter . .35 Gerrit Maritz . .36 Piet Retief . .36 Piet Uys . .36 Voortrekkers in Zululand and Natal . .37 Voortrekker settlement in the Transvaal . .38 Voortrekker settlement in the Orange Free State . .39 THE DISCOVERY OF DIAMONDS AND GOLD . .41 Page 2 EVOLUTION OF AFRICAN SOCIETIES Humankind had its earliest origins in Africa The introduction of iron changed the African and the story of life in South Africa has continent irrevocably and was a large step proven to be a micro-study of life on the forwards in the development of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Bophuthatswana and Its Impact on the North West Province, 1974-1998
    BOPHUTHATSWANA AND ITS IMPACT ON THE NORTH WEST PROVINCE, 1974-1998 MOLOKOE B.K.M. BOPHUTHATSWANA AND ITS IMPACT ON THE NORTH WEST PROVINCE, 1974-1998 by BENJAMIN KENALEMANG MATSHIDISO MOLOKOE Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY in the FACULTY OF HUMAN AND SOCIAL SCIENCES at the UNIVERSITY OF NORTH WEST SUPERVISOR: Prof. A.H. Manson DECEMBER 2000 1 DECLARATION I declare that the thesis for the degree Doctor of Philosophy at the University ofNorth West hereby submitted, has not been submitted by me for a degree at this or any other University, that it is my own work in design and execution and that all material contained herein has been duly acknowledged. 11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My very sincere gratitude is due to the many kind people who have given so much help and support. Special thanks go to: • Professor A.H. Manson, for his scholarly advice, exceptionally prompt and insightful responses to written submissions, warm encouragement and delightful sense of humour. His constructive criticisms have enriched this research. • The staff of History Department of the University of North West for their support. • The staff of the Africa Institute of South Africa for their assistance in the production of the News Paper reports relevant to my research. • Mrs Dikeledi Gaebee, the Secretary for the Dean of the Faculty of Agriculture, Science and Technology of the University of the North West for her patience and dedication while typing this work. • Mr de Klerk of Geography Department at the University of the North West for the drawing of Maps.
    [Show full text]
  • L'br<>7!J 6:1 /P. /11. Hylte/'L, Iv&1 Tp!J,47'9I
    ZL401' ~I't(t/feel t~ ;fk( ..L'br<>7!J 6:1 /p. /11. hYlte/'l, iV&1 tP!j,47'9i.: THE HISTORY OF ABAKWAMTHETHWA by ABSALOM MUZIWETHU MTHETHWA A Research Project Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the B.A. (Hons) Degree in the Department of History at the University of Zululand SUPERVISOR: Professor: A. E. Cubbin June 1995 a963923bI J I' I I j\BOVE; Tile historians: Muzi Mttle~hw2 - a~thor C N Mthcttlwa - local authority , ,,- ~.,.. BEi..OW; oYcngweni, Dlngiswayols unuzi from the road the heartlarld of KwaMtheth~a. Euphorbia t~ee in the backgrou~d. II I, I I' ii! , (i) , :ll: I FOREWORD " The motivation for the study has developed as a result of the ;,r love of my own Mthethwa people and encouragement of my super­ visor. I am very aware that what I have written is not the final work. It is my intention to develop this study into a higher degree and, in any case, this subject, will be the study of my lifetime. Therefore, if any readers of this study have any suggestions, criticisms, extra sources and ideas to present the author, they will indeed be greatly appreciated. A. M Mthethwa POBox 690 ESIKHAWINI 3887 Tel: (0351) 62413 (Home) (035) 5511057 (Work) I i I I I j (ii) DECLARATION Unless specifically stated to the contrary in the text, this project is my own original work. Mistakes that may have oc­ cu~red in this project are my sole responsibility. A. M. MTHETHWA I I ! II i I (iii) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the following persons and institutions for their assistance and support during my research and the writing of this project: * Professor A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • FUGITIVE QUEENS: Amakhosikazi and the Continuous Evolution Of
    FUGITIVE QUEENS: Amakhosikazi and the Continuous Evolution of Gender and Power in KwaZulu-Natal (1816-1889) by CAELLAGH D. MORRISSEY A THESIS Presented to the Department of History and International Studies and the Robert D. Clark Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts or Science December 2015 An Abstract of the Thesis of Caellagh Morrissey for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in the Department of History and International Studies to be taken December 2015 Title: Fugitive Queens: Amakhosikazi and the Evolution of Gender and Power in KwaZulu-Natal (1816-1889) Professor Lindsay F. Braun Amakhosikazi (elite women) played a vital role within the social, economic, and political reality of the Zulu pre-colonial state. However, histories have largely categorized them as accessory to the lives of powerful men. Through close readings of oral traditions, travelogues, and government documentation, this paper discusses the spaces in which the amakhosikazi exhibited power, and tracks changes in the social position of queen mothers, as well as some members of related groups of elite women, from the early years of the Zulu chiefdom in the 1750s up until the 1887 annexation by Britain and their crucial intervention in royal matters in 1889. The amakhosika=i can be seen operating in a complex social space wherein individual women accessed power through association to political clans, biological and economic reproduction, manipulation, and spiritual influence. Women's access to male power sources changed through both internal political shifts and external pressures. but generally increased in the first half of the 1800s, and the declined over time and with the fracturing of Zulu hegemony.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandra Thomson - Norman Durban Paper Page 1
    Sandra Thomson - Norman Durban paper Page 1 Were there large states in Southeast Africa before the rise of the Zulu Kingdom? In a rare coincidence of popular and scholarly enthusiasm, historians of Africa have paid even more attention to the Zulu state than the hiphop gangs of Chicago and the Bronx. Texts of the colonial era took Shaka and his kingdom as the paradigm of savage despotism. After decolonization, historians in tune with African nationalism reversed the image, promoting Shaka as a creative statesman who proved that Africa’s nation-building capacities owed nothing to European stimulus or example. Even after the gloss had begun to wear off the image of post-independence African leadership, historians studied the Zulu in the hope of learning how large states were constructed and sustained. “The rise of the Zulu state” became a staple of undergraduate teaching and graduate research.1 Distrustful of explanations based on individual genius, scholars looked for environmental, economic, demographic and social forces that might explain the emergence of Shaka’s kingdom along with other less famous states in the same region. The search continues into the twenty-first century.2 Over fifty years of research one assumption has gone unquestioned: the Zulu kingdom was not just a new state, it was a new kind of state – one of several that arose about the same time, some of the most prominent being the Swazi, the Ndwandwe, the Gasa, and the Ndebele. This article challenges that assumption, arguing that there is little if any evidence to support it. On the contrary, there are good reasons to suspect that states similar in structure predated those kingdoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate, Conflict and Society: Changing Responses to Weather Extremes in Nineteenth Century Zululand
    CLIMATE, CONFLICT AND SOCIETY: CHANGING RESPONSES TO WEATHER EXTREMES IN NINETEENTH CENTURY ZULULAND Jørgen Klein Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences PB 400, 2418 Elverum, Norway Email: [email protected] David J. Nash University of Brighton and University of the Witwatersrand Email: [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-7641-5857 Kathleen Pribyl University of East Anglia Email: [email protected] Georgina H. Endfield University of Liverpool ORCID: 0000-0001-6052-2204 Email: [email protected] Matthew Hannaford Utrecht University ORCID: 0000-0002-9982-9868 Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT 1 Changing climates affect human societies differently depending on societal structures, cultural perceptions and their relative vulnerability and resilience. In this study, we explore the complex relationship between climate, conflict and society in nineteenth century Zululand. The paper first reviews current debates surrounding the links between climatic change, societal transformation and the rise of the Zulu Kingdom from the late-eighteenth to early-nineteenth centuries. It then considers new empirical evidence relating to conflict and socio-economic changes at a local scale in Zululand from the early-mid-nineteenth century onwards, using a combination of unpublished archival materials written by missionaries and other observers, together with oral histories and traditions. Our analysis highlights how changing precipitation patterns, especially towards drier conditions, may have contributed to changes in societal responses, including dominant narratives about rain-control, the migration and dissolution of society, and conflicts and unrest. We suggest that temporal differences in these responses were contingent upon the role of leaders, power structures, and the willingness and ability of leaders to yield this power.
    [Show full text]
  • African Traditional Government: a Case Study of Shaka the Zulu
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Historical Research Letter www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3178 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0964 (Online) Vol.30, 2016 African Traditional Government: A Case Study of Shaka the Zulu Abiodun Adesegun, Ph.D * Adetola Adejo School of Education and Humanities, Babcock University, Ilishan Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria Abstract Bantu is a general name given to a vast group of peoples who speak several hundred different languages that can be shown to be related to one another. The Bantu who settled in South Africa belonged to a branch of Bantu peoples known as the Southern Bantu. They can be divided into a number of groups by reference to their languages. The east-coast strip was the home of numerous tribes belonging to the Nguni-speaking group. By the 18 th century they occupied the coastal area as far as the Great Fish River and were beginning to settle to the Southwest of that river in a land known as Zuurveld. The Bantu were organized in tribes, each of which consisted of one central clan, though it may contain members of other clans as well. The advent of Europeans on African soil did not meet a vacuum. Africans had systems of government that served them well. This paper investigated the rise of Shaka, the Zulu and his contribution to African traditional government that became a formidable obstacle to British imperialism in Southern Africa in the 19 th century. Keywords: administration, military, despot, and loyalty 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Chapter
    Copyrighted material – 9780230294103 Contents List of Maps ix Introduction x 1 Middle and Later Stone Age 1 Homo sapiens and other early modern humans 1 Scientific dating and climates: 244 kya–present day 2 Genetics and ‘African Eve’: 244 kya–190 kya (mis/ois-7) & 190 kya–130 kya (mis/ois-6) 5 Shell beads and ochre pigments: 130 kya–74 kya (mis/ois-5) 7 Worldwide dispersal of modern humans: 74 kya–60 kya (mis/ois-4) 9 Middle to Later Stone Age transition: 60 kya–24 kya (mis/ois-3) 10 Twa, Khoe, and San hunter-gatherers 12 Diversification of the Wilton LSA: 24 kya–11.5 kya (mis/ois-2) & 11.5 kya–today (Mis/Ois-1 Holocene) 13 Pottery, sheep & cattle from East Africa 15 Rock art: painting & engraving 17 2 Early & Middle Iron Age to c.1300 21 Bantu origins in West Africa c.2250 BCE 21 Early Iron Age people of the Western Stream c.250 BCE–CE 700 24 Early Iron Age people in East Africa 25 Eastern Stream Early Iron Age people 25 Central Stream Early Iron Age people 26 Khoe-San history during the Early Iron Age 27 The medieval warm epoch c.900–1300 29 Indian Ocean trade before c.945 30 Ivory, iron, & copper trade c.790–1020 32 Gold trade & the Mapungubwe kingdom c.950–1300 34 Other Middle Iron Age chiefdoms c.1030–1450 36 Nguni & Sotho-Tswana royal ancestry 37 Khoe-San transformation c.850–1250 38 3 Later Iron Age Societies to c.1685 43 Blackburn pottery & Nguni origins 43 Moloko pottery & Sotho-Tswana origins 45 v Copyrighted material – 9780230294103 Copyrighted material – 9780230294103 vi Contents Nguni invasions onto the Highveld 47 Indian
    [Show full text]
  • The Dingiswayo-Mthethwa Myth and the Teaching of Contemporary Oral History in the South African Secondary Syllabus Robert Papini
    Page 1 of 14 Breathing life into dry bones: The Dingiswayo-Mthethwa myth and the teaching of contemporary oral history in the South African secondary syllabus Robert Papini In response to the crisis of history teaching in South African schools, a History/Archaeology Panel reported to the Education Minister on 14 December 2000; it referred to an earlier report to the Minister (by the Working Group on Values in Education, also 2000) titled ‘Values, Education and Democracy’, which argued that the richness of history has "a larger capacity than any other discipline (to) promote reconciliation and reciprocal respect of a meaningful kind, because it encourages a knowledge of the other, the unknown and the different". The Panel chair, novelist and UCT vice-chancellor Njabulo Ndebele in his speech announcing the Report, quoted from it that "In conditions of flux, historical study of a probing kind is a vital aid against amnesia, and a warning against any triumphalism of the present" (Ndebele). This is a clear call for the nation-building potential of a revised history that breaks with the dominant mode of historiography, to draw on ‘other’ traditions of memory - among them contemporary oral history. The Report states that the study of history "enables us to listen to formerly subjugated voices and to redress the invisibility of the formerly marginalised. In our country it is self-evident that oral history, both formal and informal, is of great importance in recovering suppressed or neglected voices". It then recommends, under ‘Skills promotion’ (p24) that "History methodology should also incorporate the acquisition of related wider skills, such as the establishment of community archives and school archives, particularly in rural settlements where there are no such repositories".
    [Show full text]
  • Prelmfecane Carry-Overs in Subsequent Ndebeu Politics
    PRELMFECANE CARRY-OVERS IN SUBSEQUENT NDEBEU POLITICS by Lance F Morrow Some scholarly attention has now been directed both at the basic integrative processes operative in the formation of large centralized states in Southern and Central Africa during the Mfecane and at the development of segmentary characteristics within them after they were established. (1) However, the collateral problem of pre- Mfecane social and political carry-overs in these new multi-tribal societies has virtually been ignored (2) ,despite the inherent improbability of complete integration within the lifetimes of people whose basic attitudes and loyalties had been formed before they became incorporated in the newly organized kingdoms. It is curious that the problems of detribalization and national integration experienced by socially heterogeneous African states in our own day have not encouraged more study of earlier parallels, but this too may be a legacy of the long preoccupation with European "penetration" and African "response". The sources are also exceptionally poor because the whole apparatus of kingship was necessarily committed to suppression of pre-existing clan and tribal alignments, and few white observers were afterwards able to identify the diverse ethnic components of the new states. The earlier history of many of these factions has also been obscured by the radical social dislocation of the Mfecane, and it is often very difficult to determine the parent groups and previous relationships of many lineages which exercised great influence in the new kingdoms. This paper is, therefore, merely a preliminary attempt to trace the pre-Mfecane origins of a deeply rooted social and political cleavage in the Ndebele kingdom of Mzilikazi, a Mfecane conquest state in which the socially homogeneous core was extremely small.
    [Show full text]