DOCSLIB.ORG

The Neuronal Genome of Caenorhabditis Elegans* Oliver Hobert§ Columbia University Medical Center, HHMI, New York, NY, USA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Neuronal Genome of Caenorhabditis Elegans* Oliver Hobert§ Columbia University Medical Center, HHMI, New York, NY, USA The neuronal genome of Caenorhabditis elegans* Oliver Hobert§ Columbia University Medical Center, HHMI, New York, NY, USA Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................3 2. Ion channels ...........................................................................................................................6 2.1. Potassium channels ........................................................................................................ 8 2.2. Calcium channels, transporters and calcium binding proteins ................................................. 9 2.3. TRP channels ............................................................................................................. 12 2.4. Cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels .............................................................................. 12 2.5. Ligand-gated ion channels ............................................................................................ 12 2.6. Ionotropic glutamate receptors ....................................................................................... 15 2.7. DEG/ENaC/ASIC channels ........................................................................................... 15 2.8. Chloride channels and chloride transporters ...................................................................... 16 2.9. New ion channels ........................................................................................................ 17 2.10. Summary of absent ion channels ................................................................................... 18 3. Neurotransmitter pathways ...................................................................................................... 18 3.1. Neurotransmitter synthesis ............................................................................................ 19 3.2. Vesicular transport of neurotransmitters ........................................................................... 21 3.3. Neurotransmitter reuptake ............................................................................................. 22 3.4. Neurotransmitter degradation ........................................................................................ 23 3.5. The case for and against other neurotransmitter systems ..................................................... 23 4. Neuropeptides ....................................................................................................................... 25 4.1. Neuropeptide-encoding genes ........................................................................................ 25 4.2. Biosynthesis and processing of neuropeptides ................................................................... 25 4.3. Neuropeptide receptors ................................................................................................. 26 5. G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) ........................................................................................ 26 5.1. Metabotropic neurotransmitter receptors .......................................................................... 27 5.2. Neuropeptide receptors ................................................................................................. 27 5.3. Sensory and orphan receptors ........................................................................................ 28 5.4. Adhesion GPCRs ........................................................................................................ 29 5.5. Frizzled/Taste2 GPCRs ................................................................................................ 29 *Edited by: Eric Jorgensen. Last revised December 27, 2012, Published August 13, 2013. This chapter should be cited as: Hobert O. The neuronal genome of Caenorhabditis elegans (August 13, 2013), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook, doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.161.1, http://www.wormbook.org. Copyright: © 2013 Oliver Hobert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. §To whom correspondence should be addressed: E-mail [email protected] 1 The neuronal genome of Caenorhabditis elegans 5.6. Downstream of GPCRs ................................................................................................ 29 6. Cyclic GMP .......................................................................................................................... 30 6.1. Guanylyl cyclases ....................................................................................................... 30 6.2. Phosphodiesterases ...................................................................................................... 31 7. Receptors for CO and O ........................................................................................................ 31 2 2 8. Presynaptic machinery ............................................................................................................ 31 9. Neurotransmitter receptor localization: PDZ proteins .................................................................... 32 10. Gap junctions - the innexins ................................................................................................... 32 11. Motor proteins & their associated complexes ............................................................................. 33 11.1. Kinesin, dynein and myosin motors ............................................................................... 33 11.2. Motor complexes that build cilia of sensory neurons ......................................................... 33 12. Neuronal recognition and adhesion molecules ............................................................................ 33 12.1. Immunoglobulin superfamily ....................................................................................... 34 12.2. Leucine-Rich Repeat (LRR) proteins ............................................................................. 34 12.3. Cadherins ................................................................................................................. 34 12.4. Neurexin and its ligands .............................................................................................. 35 13. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 35 14. Tables 2-35 ......................................................................................................................... 36 Table 2: Potassium channels (72 genes) ................................................................................. 36 Table 3: Candidate auxiliary subunits for various types of ion channels (93 genes) ........................ 39 Table 4: Voltage-gated calcium channels (9 genes) .................................................................. 42 Table 5: SLC transporters with confirmed or putative neuronal functions (82 genes) ...................... 43 Table 6: Calcium binding proteins – the “EF hand-only” proteins (65 genes) ................................ 46 Table 7: TRP channels (23 genes) ........................................................................................ 48 Table 8: Cyclic nucleotide gated channels (6 genes) ................................................................. 49 Table 9: nAChR-type ligand-gated ion channels of the Cys-loop LGIC superfamily (61 genes) ........ 50 Table 10: Other ligand-gated ion channels of the Cys-loop LGIC superfamily (41 genes) ................ 52 Table 11: Ionotropic glutamate receptors (15 genes) ................................................................ 53 Table 12: DEG/ENaC channels (32 genes) ............................................................................. 54 Table 13: Chloride channels (35 genes) ................................................................................. 55 Table 14: Neurotransmitter synthesis and degradation (36 genes) ............................................... 56 Table 15: Neuropeptide-encoding genes (122 genes) ................................................................ 58 Table 16: Metabolism of neuropeptides (47 genes) .................................................................. 59 Table 17: Insulin/EGF receptor-like proteins (70 genes) ........................................................... 61 Table 18: The five classes of GPCRs .................................................................................... 63 Table 19: Metabotropic neurotransmitter receptors (27 genes) ................................................... 64 Table 20: GPCR-type putative neuropeptide receptors and their grouping into families (153 genes) .. 65 Table 21: Representative analysis of srw genes reveals their relation to neuropeptide receptors ........ 73 Table 22: Adhesion-type GPCRs (5 genes) ............................................................................. 74 Table 23: Downstream of GPCRs (83 genes) .......................................................................... 75 Table 24: Making and breaking cGMP - Guanylyl cyclases and phosphodiesterases (40 genes) ........ 77 Table 25: Receptors of CO and O (39 genes plus 7 soluble GCY genes) .................................... 78 2 2 Table 26: Synaptic vesicle proteins and their homologs (57 genes)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Damage Sensor Associated with the Cuticle Coordinates Three Core Environmental Stress Responses in Caenorhabditis Elegans
    HIGHLIGHTED ARTICLE | INVESTIGATION A Damage Sensor Associated with the Cuticle Coordinates Three Core Environmental Stress Responses in Caenorhabditis elegans William Dodd,*,1 Lanlan Tang,*,1 Jean-Christophe Lone,† Keon Wimberly,* Cheng-Wei Wu,* Claudia Consalvo,* Joni E. Wright,* Nathalie Pujol,†,2 and Keith P. Choe*,2 *Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 and †Aix Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, CIML, Marseille, France ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8889-3197 (N.P.) ABSTRACT Extracellular matrix barriers and inducible cytoprotective genes form successive lines of defense against chemical and microbial environmental stressors. The barrier in nematodes is a collagenous extracellular matrix called the cuticle. In Caenorhabditis elegans, disruption of some cuticle collagen genes activates osmolyte and antimicrobial response genes. Physical damage to the epidermis also activates antimicrobial responses. Here, we assayed the effect of knocking down genes required for cuticle and epidermal integrity on diverse cellular stress responses. We found that disruption of specific bands of collagen, called annular furrows, coactivates detoxification, hyperosmotic, and antimicrobial response genes, but not other stress responses. Disruption of other cuticle structures and epidermal integrity does not have the same effect. Several transcription factors act downstream of furrow loss. SKN-1/ Nrf and ELT-3/GATA are required for detoxification, SKN-1/Nrf is partially required for the osmolyte response, and STA-2/Stat and ELT- 3/GATA for antimicrobial gene expression. Our results are consistent with a cuticle-associated damage sensor that coordinates de- toxification, hyperosmotic, and antimicrobial responses through overlapping, but distinct, downstream signaling. KEYWORDS damage sensor; collagen; detoxification; osmotic stress; antimicrobial response XTRACELLULAR matrices (ECMs) are ubiquitous features Internal and epidermal tissues secrete ECMs as mechanical Eof animal tissues composed of secreted fibrous proteins support.
    [Show full text]
  • A Transparent Window Into Biology: a Primer on Caenorhabditis Elegans* Ann K
    A Transparent window into biology: A primer on Caenorhabditis elegans* Ann K. Corsi1§, Bruce Wightman2§, and Martin Chalfie3§ 1Biology Department, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064 2Biology Department, Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA 18104 3Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................2 2. C. elegans basics .....................................................................................................................4 2.1. Growth and maintenance ................................................................................................ 4 2.2. Sexual forms and their importance .................................................................................... 5 2.3. Life cycle ....................................................................................................................7 3. C. elegans genetics ...................................................................................................................8 4. Why choose C. elegans? ......................................................................................................... 10 5. C. elegans tissues ................................................................................................................... 11 5.1. Epidermis: a model for extracellular matrix production, wound healing, and cell fusion ............ 12 5.2. Muscles—controlling
    [Show full text]
  • Ligand-Gated Chloride Channels Are Receptors for Biogenic Amines in C
    Ligand-Gated Chloride Channels Are Receptors for Biogenic Amines in C. elegans The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Ringstad, N., N. Abe, and H. R. Horvitz. “Ligand-Gated Chloride Channels Are Receptors for Biogenic Amines in C. elegans.” Science 325, no. 5936 (July 2, 2009): 96-100. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1169243 Publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84506 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Science. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 October 25. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Science. 2009 July 3; 325(5936): 96±100. doi:10.1126/science.1169243. Ligand-gated chloride channels are receptors for biogenic amines in C. elegans Niels Ringstad1,2, Namiko Abe1,2,3, and H. Robert Horvitz1 1HHMI, Department of Biology and McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge MA 02139 Abstract Biogenic amines such as serotonin and dopamine are intercellular signaling molecules that function widely as neurotransmitters and neuromodulators. We have identified in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans three ligand-gated chloride channels that are receptors for biogenic amines: LGC-53 is a high-affinity dopamine receptor, LGC-55 is a high-affinity tyramine receptor, and LGC-40 is a low-affinity serotonin receptor that is also gated by choline and acetylcholine.
    [Show full text]
  • 4695389.Pdf (3.200Mb)
    Non-classical amine recognition evolved in a large clade of olfactory receptors The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Li, Qian, Yaw Tachie-Baffour, Zhikai Liu, Maude W Baldwin, Andrew C Kruse, and Stephen D Liberles. 2015. “Non-classical amine recognition evolved in a large clade of olfactory receptors.” eLife 4 (1): e10441. doi:10.7554/eLife.10441. http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/ eLife.10441. Published Version doi:10.7554/eLife.10441 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:23993622 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA RESEARCH ARTICLE Non-classical amine recognition evolved in a large clade of olfactory receptors Qian Li1, Yaw Tachie-Baffour1, Zhikai Liu1, Maude W Baldwin2, Andrew C Kruse3, Stephen D Liberles1* 1Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States; 2Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States; 3Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States Abstract Biogenic amines are important signaling molecules, and the structural basis for their recognition by G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) is well understood. Amines are also potent odors, with some activating olfactory trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs). Here, we report that teleost TAARs evolved a new way to recognize amines in a non-classical orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Membranes and Transport Membranes Define the External
    Biological Membranes and Transport Membranes define the external boundaries of cells and regulate the molecular traffic across that boundary; in eukaryotic cells, they divide the internal space into discrete compartments to segregate processes and components. Membranes are flexible, self-sealing, and selectively permeable to polar solutes. Their flexibility permits the shape changes that accompany cell growth and movement (such as amoeboid movement). With their ability to break and reseal, two membranes can fuse, as in exocytosis, or a single membrane-enclosed compartment can undergo fission to yield two sealed compartments, as in endocytosis or cell division, without creating gross leaks through cellular surfaces. Because membranes are selectively permeable, they retain certain compounds and ions within cells and within specific cellular compartments, while excluding others. Membranes are not merely passive barriers. Membranes consist of just two layers of molecules and are therefore very thin; they are essentially two-dimensional. Because intermolecular collisions are far more probable in this two-dimensional space than in three-dimensional space, the efficiency of enzyme-catalyzed processes organized within membranes is vastly increased. The Molecular Constituents of Membranes Molecular components of membranes include proteins and polar lipids, which account for almost all the mass of biological membranes, and carbohydrate present as part of glycoproteins and glycolipids. Each type of membrane has characteristic lipids and proteins. The relative proportions of protein and lipid vary with the type of membrane, reflecting the diversity of biological roles (as shown in table 12-1, see below). For example, plasma membranes of bacteria and the membranes of mitochondria and chloroplasts, in which many enzyme-catalyzed processes take place, contain more protein than lipid.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Novel Peptide Hormones in the Human Genome Olivier Mirabeau
    Searching for novel peptide hormones in the human genome Olivier Mirabeau To cite this version: Olivier Mirabeau. Searching for novel peptide hormones in the human genome. Life Sciences [q-bio]. Université Montpellier II - Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, 2008. English. tel-00340710 HAL Id: tel-00340710 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00340710 Submitted on 21 Nov 2008 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITE MONTPELLIER II SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES DU LANGUEDOC THESE pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L'UNIVERSITE MONTPELLIER II Discipline : Biologie Informatique Ecole Doctorale : Sciences chimiques et biologiques pour la santé Formation doctorale : Biologie-Santé Recherche de nouvelles hormones peptidiques codées par le génome humain par Olivier Mirabeau présentée et soutenue publiquement le 30 janvier 2008 JURY M. Hubert Vaudry Rapporteur M. Jean-Philippe Vert Rapporteur Mme Nadia Rosenthal Examinatrice M. Jean Martinez Président M. Olivier Gascuel Directeur M. Cornelius Gross Examinateur Résumé Résumé Cette thèse porte sur la découverte de gènes humains non caractérisés codant pour des précurseurs à hormones peptidiques. Les hormones peptidiques (PH) ont un rôle important dans la plupart des processus physiologiques du corps humain.
    [Show full text]
  • Dependent Activation
    Ca2؉-binding activity of a COOH-terminal fragment of the Drosophila BK channel involved in Ca2؉-dependent activation Shumin Bian*, Isabelle Favre*†, and Edward Moczydlowski*‡§ Departments of *Pharmacology and ‡Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520-8066 Communicated by Ramon Latorre, Center for Scientific Studies of Santiago, Valdivia, Chile, February 13, 2001 (received for review November 28, 2000) Mutational and biophysical analysis suggests that an intracellular S0–S6 plus a portion of the COOH terminus, whereas the Ϸ400 .(COOH-terminal domain of the large conductance Ca2؉-activated residue sequence following the linker comprises the Tail (Fig. 1 K؉ channel (BK channel) contains Ca2؉-binding site(s) that are Experiments with chimeric Core-Tail constructs by using Slo1 allosterically coupled to channel opening. However the structural genes of different species suggest that the Ca2ϩ-sensing function basis of Ca2؉ binding to BK channels is unknown. To pursue this of the channel is associated with the Tail domain (9). More question, we overexpressed the COOH-terminal 280 residues of the recent studies making use of the Ca2ϩ-insensitive Slo3 Kϩ Drosophila slowpoke BK channel (Dslo-C280) as a FLAG- and His6- channel gene verified that specific regions of protein sequence tagged protein in Escherichia coli. We purified Dslo-C280 in soluble within the Tail confer the property of Ca2ϩ-dependent gating ؉ ؉ form and used a 45Ca2 -overlay protein blot assay to detect Ca2 (10). Complementary mutational studies identified an Asp-rich ؉ binding. Dslo-C280 exhibits specific binding of 45Ca2 in compari- sequence motif in the Tail domain (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryostatin Enhancement of Memory in Hermissenda
    Reference: Biol. Bull. 210: 201–214. (June 2006) A contribution to The Biological Bulletin Virtual Symposium © 2006 Marine Biological Laboratory on Marine Invertebrate Models of Learning and Memory. Bryostatin Enhancement of Memory in Hermissenda A. M. KUZIRIAN1,*, H. T. EPSTEIN1, C. J. GAGLIARDI1,2, T. J. NELSON3, M. SAKAKIBARA4, C. TAYLOR5, A. B. SCIOLETTI1,6, AND D. L. ALKON3 1 Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543; 2 Science Department, Roger Williams University, Bristol, Rhode Island 02809; 3 Blanchette Rockefeller Neurosciences Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Rockville, Maryland 20850; 4 Department of Biological Science and Technology, Tokai University, Shizuoka, Japan; 5 Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104; and 6 Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 Abstract. Bryostatin, a potent agonist of protein kinase C bryostatin revealed changes in input resistance and an en- (PKC), when administered to Hermissenda was found to hanced long-lasting depolarization (LLD) in response to affect acquisition of an associative learning paradigm. Low light. Likewise, quantitative immunocytochemical measure- bryostatin concentrations (0.1 to 0.5 ng/ml) enhanced mem- ments using an antibody specific for the PKC-activated ϩ ory acquisition, while concentrations higher than 1.0 ng/ml Ca2 /GTP-binding protein calexcitin showed enhanced an- down-regulated the pathway and no recall of the associative tibody labeling with bryostatin. training was exhibited. The extent of enhancement de- Animals exposed to the PKC inhibitor bisindolylmaleim- pended upon the conditioning regime used and the memory ide-XI (Ro-32-0432) administered by immersion prior to stage normally fostered by that regime. The effects of two 9-TE conditioning showed no training-induced changes training events (TEs) with paired conditioned and uncondi- with or without bryostatin exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Minding the Calcium Store: Ryanodine Receptor Activation As a Convergent Mechanism of PCB Toxicity
    Pharmacology & Therapeutics 125 (2010) 260–285 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Pharmacology & Therapeutics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pharmthera Associate Editor: Carey Pope Minding the calcium store: Ryanodine receptor activation as a convergent mechanism of PCB toxicity Isaac N. Pessah ⁎, Gennady Cherednichenko, Pamela J. Lein Department of Molecular Biosciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA article info abstract Keywords: Chronic low-level polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) exposures remain a significant public health concern since Ryanodine receptor (RyR) results from epidemiological studies indicate that PCB burden is associated with immune system Calcium-induced calcium release dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, and impairment of the developing nervous system. Of these various Calcium regulation adverse health effects, developmental neurotoxicity has emerged as a particularly vulnerable endpoint in Polychlorinated biphenyls PCB toxicity. Arguably the most pervasive biological effects of PCBs could be mediated by their ability to alter Triclosan fi 2+ Bastadins the spatial and temporal delity of Ca signals through one or more receptor-mediated processes. This Polybrominated diphenylethers review will focus on our current knowledge of the structure and function of ryanodine receptors (RyRs) in Developmental neurotoxicity muscle and nerve cells and how PCBs and related non-coplanar structures alter these functions. The Activity dependent plasticity molecular and cellular mechanisms by which non-coplanar PCBs and related structures alter local and global Ca2+ signaling properties and the possible short and long-term consequences of these perturbations on neurodevelopment and neurodegeneration are reviewed. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction ............................................... 260 2. Ryanodine receptor macromolecular complexes: significance to polychlorinated biphenyl-mediated Ca2+ dysregulation .
    [Show full text]
  • DEPLETION of SOMATOSTATIN-LIKE IMMUNOREACTIVITY in the RAT CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM by Cysteaminel
    0270~6474/82/0202-0225$02.00/O The Journal of Neuroscience Copyright 0 Society for Neuroscience Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 225-231 Printed in U.S.A. February 1982 DEPLETION OF SOMATOSTATIN-LIKE IMMUNOREACTIVITY IN THE RAT CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM BY CYSTEAMINEl STEPHEN M. SAGAR,2 DONALD LANDRY,” WILLIAM J. MILLARD, THOMAS M. BADGER,* MICHAEL A. ARNOLD, AND JOSEPH B. MARTIN Department of Neurology and *Department of Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114 Received July 31, 1981; Accepted October 8, 1981 - Abstract Selective neurotoxins have been of value in providing a means for specifically interfering with the actions of endogenous neurotransmitter candidates. Others have shown cysteamine (CSH) to deplete the gastrointestinal tract and hypothalamus of rats of immunoreactive somatostatin, suggesting a toxic action of that compound directed against somatostatin-containing cells. The present study further defines the actions of cysteamine on somatostatin in the central nervous system (CNS). Cysteamine hydrochloride administered subcutaneously results in a depletion of somatostatin-like immunoreactivity (SLI) in the retina, brain, and cervical spinal cord of rats. The effect is demon- strable at doses of 30 mg/kg of body weight and above, occurs within 2 to 4 hr of a single injection of the drug, and is largely reversible within 1 week. The mean depletion of SLI observed within the CNS varies from 38% in cerebral cortex to 65% in cervical spinal cord 24 hr following administration of CSH, 300 mg/kg of body weight, S.C. By gel permeation chromatography, all molecular weight forms of SLI are affected, with the largest reductions in those forms that co-chromatograph with synthetic somatostatin-14 and somatostatin-28.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Cell Membrane Information Reception, Processing, and Communication in the Structure and Function of Multicellular Tissue
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review The Role of Cell Membrane Information Reception, Processing, and Communication in the Structure and Function of Multicellular Tissue Robert A. Gatenby Departments of Radiology and Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; robert.gatenby@moffitt.org Received: 9 July 2019; Accepted: 18 July 2019; Published: 24 July 2019 Abstract: Investigations of information dynamics in eukaryotic cells focus almost exclusively on heritable information in the genome. Gene networks are modeled as “central processors” that receive, analyze, and respond to intracellular and extracellular signals with the nucleus described as a cell’s control center. Here, we present a model in which cellular information is a distributed system that includes non-genomic information processing in the cell membrane that may quantitatively exceed that of the genome. Within this model, the nucleus largely acts a source of macromolecules and processes information needed to synchronize their production with temporal variations in demand. However, the nucleus cannot produce microsecond responses to acute, life-threatening perturbations and cannot spatially resolve incoming signals or direct macromolecules to the cellular regions where they are needed. In contrast, the cell membrane, as the interface with its environment, can rapidly detect, process, and respond to external threats and opportunities through the large amounts of potential information encoded within the transmembrane ion gradient. Our model proposes environmental information is detected by specialized protein gates within ion-specific transmembrane channels. When the gate receives a specific environmental signal, the ion channel opens and the received information is communicated into the cell via flow of a specific ion species (i.e., K+, Na+, 2+ 2+ Cl−, Ca , Mg ) along electrochemical gradients.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Mechanisms of Somatostatin Expression
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Regulatory Mechanisms of Somatostatin Expression Emmanuel Ampofo * , Lisa Nalbach, Michael D. Menger and Matthias W. Laschke Institute for Clinical & Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany; [email protected] (L.N.); [email protected] (M.D.M.); [email protected] (M.W.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-6841-162-6561; Fax: +49-6841-162-6553 Received: 25 May 2020; Accepted: 9 June 2020; Published: 11 June 2020 Abstract: Somatostatin is a peptide hormone, which most commonly is produced by endocrine cells and the central nervous system. In mammals, somatostatin originates from pre-prosomatostatin and is processed to a shorter form, i.e., somatostatin-14, and a longer form, i.e., somatostatin-28. The two peptides repress growth hormone secretion and are involved in the regulation of glucagon and insulin synthesis in the pancreas. In recent years, the processing and secretion of somatostatin have been studied intensively. However, little attention has been paid to the regulatory mechanisms that control its expression. This review provides an up-to-date overview of these mechanisms. In particular, it focuses on the role of enhancers and silencers within the promoter region as well as on the binding of modulatory transcription factors to these elements. Moreover, it addresses extracellular factors, which trigger key signaling pathways, leading to an enhanced somatostatin expression in health and disease. Keywords: somatostatin; pre-prosomatostatin; δ-cells; central nervous system (CNS); gut; hypothalamus; cAMP resonse element (CRE); pancreas/duodenum homeobox protein (PDX)1; paired box protein (PAX)6; growth hormone (GH); brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF); glutamateric system; pancreas 1.
    [Show full text]