GBOS Grant Cycle History Group 2019 Requested 2019 Granted

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GBOS Grant Cycle History Group 2019 Requested 2019 Granted GBOS Grant Cycle History Group 2019 Requested 2019 granted 2020 requested 2020 granted 2021 request Little Bears Playhouse, Inc $12,045 $9,420 $10,000 $9,333 $10,000 Challenge Alaska $10,000 $6,680 $10,000 $8,945 $10,000 Glacier Valley Transit $5,000 $4,280.00 $5,000 $4,765 $6,000 Girdwood Art Institute $6,000 $4,440 $4,440 $4,612 $5,820 Girdwood Community Club $8,000 $5,180 $8,000 $7,345 $8,000 total $41,045 $30,000 $37,440 $35,000 $39,820 Four Valleys CS $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $25,000 $25,000 Municipality of Anchorage Girdwood Parks & Recreation Non-Profit Recreation Organization Grant Funding Information Instructions for Grant Reviewers: Applicants will have the opportunity to present their programs at the September 15, 2020 Grant Presentation meeting. GBOS members will receive a copy of each application and an evaluation worksheet. Please read the applications and complete the evaluation worksheet prior to the October 19, 2020 GBOS meeting. As part of this process, you will determine the amount that you recommend is funded for each program. Grant funding will be voted on at the October 19, 2020 regular meeting. Bring your completed evaluation worksheets to the meeting. At that meeting, programs will be discussed and GBOS members will provide their recommendations for funding. GBOS funding amounts will be averaged and adjusted to meet the budget of $35,000, and the revised average will be voted on. Email your completed evaluation worksheets to [email protected] after the October 19, 2020 meeting. These will be held with other grant documents for auditing purposes. Below is information provided to grantees with their Non-Profit Recreation Grant application, which should be helpful to you in evaluating. Please familiarize yourself with the application criteria before completing the evaluation worksheet for each program. Non-Profit Recreation Organization Grant Funding Information BUDGET YEAR 2021 The Parks and Recreation Department strives to ensure that comprehensive and diverse recreation programs and activities are made available to the community. The objective of this grant program is to provide funding assistance to non-profit organizations to operate a variety of quality recreation programs. How do we define recreation? Recreation: Consists of leisure time activities that contribute to healthful living. Enhances participation and skill-building. Instills positive personality characteristics. Expands one’s interests and increases quality of life. Eligible programs fall into one or more of the following categories: I. Enable citizens to participate in recreation activities. Grant funds will be specifically used to: A. Provide scholarships to individuals, or B. Directly result in a quantifiable fee reduction to the participant. II. Expand existing recreational programming. The grant funded program will fill a need in the community that: A. Can’t be met by the Municipality as effectively or efficiently, or B. Is not currently being met by another agency in the community. III. Depending upon the level of funding available, the following will be considered on a limited basis: A. Innovative unique programs requiring seed money. B. One time special recreational opportunity for the community. Additional grant funds will not be solicited in the future. Restrictions on this funding: I. The organization must have obtained non-profit status recognized by the State of Alaska before a contract can be executed. Informal associations are not eligible for grants. II. There are no guarantees of annual funding; the intent is for your group or program to become self-sufficient. III. This grant funding is subject to the availability of funds lawfully appropriated for disbursement. IV. The intent is to supplement your budget, not to fund your program in total. It should be noted that funding is provided, in full, within a reasonable period upon execution of the contract. V. Grants are for direct program expenses only, such as program supplies, equipment or facility rental for program activities, program staff wages (to a limited degree), program travel expenses within the Anchorage area, etc. VI. Grant funds may not be used for general operating or administrative expenses of your organization, such as administrative personnel expenses, non-program space rent or utility costs, liability insurance, office supplies, audit or legal fees, fund-raising expense, etc. VII. Recreation programming is the goal; grant funds are not to be used for construction activities or capital equipment. NOTE: This is not intended to be a closed list, but rather a sampling of the key restrictive parameters. Evaluation Criteria – The Grant Review Committee will evaluate your application based on: I. Purpose of the Program: What demonstrated community need is being met? What is the impact on the community if this program is not provided? What other programs/agencies exist to meet this need? How do they compare to this program? II. Management of the Program: Does your application show effective management of financial and human resources? Are there appropriate technical skills and knowledge of this program service? Is it fiscally responsible? Does it have a proven ability/track record? III. Community Support of Program: Are the following elements evident in your application? Strong participation, volunteer services, financial support from other funding sources such as private and corporate contributions, user fees, in-kind donations? IV. Specifics of Program: Target population – who benefits from your program? Is it cost-effective? Did you include a well thought out concept and organized plan of action? Does it include measurable results? Is this a recreation oriented program? V. Appearance: Is the application neat and no longer than 6 pages? Applications in excess of 6 pages will be returned. Please be concise and complete in your application. 2021 GBOS Non-Profit Grant 2020 Achievements: • 3 Girdwood Athletes—Scholarship $3,170 • 40 Girdwood Volunteers—Received $8,500 in training • 9 Girdwood based Keil Center Rentals (Challenge Building)— Received over $9,000 in discounts • Dormitory remodel complete pending Fire Marshal review 2021 Plans: • 40th season of operations! • Operate safely during COVID-19 Pandemic • Continue to focus on building relations within the Girdwood community • Invest in maintenance on the Keil Center • Year-Round Girdwood operations pending VA Grant (will not affect Girdwood Fine Arts Camp) GBOS 2021 Grant Cycle Girdwood Arts Camp Program Description • 2 consecutive weeks in the summer: dates for 2021 are July 26 -August 6th • Annual program for 34 years without interruption since 1986 • Primary camp for ages 5-8, one 2-hr session and one 3-hr session a day • Intermediate camp for ages 9-15, one 4-hr session a day • Focus intensives • Quality art instruction – out of state and local • Public show of works at the end of the camp. Demonstrated need • Full enrollments • 34 years of success • Funding for arts in public schools is decreasing • Anchorage is far away • 2020 – particular need due to limited recreation / enrichment options in COVID times Program Report 2020 • COVID precautions and safety measures: masks donated by Denise Gallup; sanitizers; extra cleaning routines; halved enrollment to facilitate distancing. • 33 kids and 4 teenage apprentices – we halved our enrollment and limited enrollment only to full two weeks for all sessions. That drastically cut our enrolled numbers (usually around 75) and consequently tuition. • Community mural at the playground – painted by kids led by a Dena’na artist and activist • Very positive reports from kids and families – much appreciation for our program in this particular year. Program Outlook for 2021 • Estimate 80 kids and teen apprentices in 2020 • 250 community members and families at the Final Show • Focus Intensive • Winter intensives – if all goes well with COVID Reasonable Fees • $250 for 2 weeks - Primary camp / $350 for 2 weeks – Intermediate camp • Accessible tuition for quality program for Girdwood kids. Tuition has not been raised in 9 years • GBOS sibling scholarships and Atwood Foundation/Forest Fair need-based scholarships • Comparable programs charge more Volunteer and Local Business Support • Directors and Board members volunteer time to plan and administer camp • Families, community members, teenagers, retired teachers. • Local businesses donate and support generously: • Spoonline Catering and BakeShop provided generous discounts • Lions Club offered their tents for outdoor programming • Community building and inter-organizational support in Girdwood Valley: • Challenge Alaska provides an extremely generous rent discount • Glacier Valley Transit – in better times provides rides to the kids when mural is repainted every other year • Four Valleys courageously handles our registration and communication with families Ability to continue with reduced funding • Staff will be required to teach more • Fewer professional artists • Less exposure to variety among instructors and media • Fewer scholarships • Fewer kids able to participate. Other Funding • No raised tuition -> we seek funding instead • Continuous Funding: GBOS, AK State Council on the Arts, KMTA, Pick.Click.Give, Forest Fair Committme, Atwood Foundation • Individual donors • 2020 additional funding: MUNI Mayor’s Arts Grant and COVID CARES Act • Approaching Carr Foundation and Kumon Foundation GBOS 2020 FUNDING REPORT • GBOS 2020 grant $4612 • The money was split between sibling scholarships (6 = $1900), 4 apprentice salaries
Recommended publications
  • The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review
    The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review Third Edition Editor John P Janka Law Business Research The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review THIRD EDITION Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. This article was first published in TheT echnology, Media and Telecommunications Review, 3rd edition (published in October 2012 – editor John P Janka). For further information please email [email protected] 2 The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review THIRD EDITION Editor John P Janka Law Business Research Ltd The Law Reviews THE MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS REVIEW THE RESTRUCTURING REVIEW THE PRIVATE COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT REVIEW THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION REVIEW THE EMPLOYMENT LAW REVIEW THE PUBLIC COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT REVIEW THE BANKING REGULATION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION REVIEW THE MERGER CONTROL REVIEW THE TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVIEW THE INWARD INVESTMENT AND INTERNATIONAL TAXATION REVIEW THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REVIEW THE CORPORATE IMMIGRATION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS REVIEW THE PROJECTS AND CONSTRUCTION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL MARKETS REVIEW THE REAL ESTATE LAW REVIEW THE PRIVATE EQUITY REVIEW THE ENERGY REGULATION AND MARKETS REVIEW THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW THE ASSET MANAGEMENT REVIEW THE PRIVATE WEALTH AND PRIVATE CLIENT REVIEW www.TheLawReviews.co.uk PUBLISHER Gideon Roberton BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Adam Sargent MARKETING MANAGERS Nick Barette, Katherine Jablonowska, Alexandra Wan PUBLISHING ASSISTANT Lucy Brewer EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Lydia Gerges PRODUCTION MANAGER Adam Myers PRODUCTION EDITOR Joanne Morley SUBEDITOR Caroline Rawson EDITor-in-CHIEF Callum Campbell MANAGING DIRECTOR Richard Davey Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London 87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK © 2012 Law Business Research Ltd © Copyright in individual chapters vests with the contributors No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply.
    [Show full text]
  • [.Watch.] News of the World (2020) Movie Online Full 11 June 2021
    [.Watch.] News of the World (2020) Movie Online Full 11 June 2021 11 secs ago. mAniAc.mAyhEm.XSTRETCHY/Watch News of the World (2021) Full Movie Online Free HD,News of the World Full Free, [#NewsoftheWorld2021] Full Movie Online, Watch News of the World Movie Online Free,News of the World Movie Full Watch Online Free Official STRETCHY Business Partner with watching NEWS OF THE WORLD Online (2021) Full ARCTIC/DESTRETCHY!!~watch News of the World (2021) FULL Movie Online Free? HQ Reddit&Youtube Video [STRETCHY] News of the World (2021) Full Movie Watch online free [#NewsoftheWorld2021] Google Drive/News of the World (2021) Full Movie Watch online No Sign Up English 123Movies #NewsoftheWorld2021 Online !! In News of the World, the gang is back but the game has changed. As they return to rescue one of their own, the players will have to brave parts unknown from arid deserts to snowy mountains, to escape the world’s most dangerous game. News of the World (2021) [STRETCHY] | Watch News of the World Online 2021 Full Movie Free HD.720Px|Watch News of the World Online 2021 Full MovieS Free HD !! News of the World (2021) with English Subtitles ready for download, News of the World 2021 720p, 1080p, BrRip, DvdRip, Youtube, Reddit, Multilanguage and High Quality. Watch News of the World Online Free Streaming, Watch News of the World Online Full Streaming In HD Quality, Let’s go to watch the latest movies of your favorite movies, News of the World. come on join us!! What happened in this movie? I have a summary for you.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Freedom Under Attack
    LEVESON’S ILLIBERAL LEGACY AUTHORS HELEN ANTHONY MIKE HARRIS BREAKING SASHY NATHAN PADRAIG REIDY NEWS FOREWORD BY PROFESSOR TIM LUCKHURST PRESS FREEDOM UNDER ATTACK , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. WHY IS THE FREE PRESS IMPORTANT? 2. THE LEVESON INQUIRY, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 A background to Leveson: previous inquiries and press complaints bodies 2.2 The Leveson Inquiry’s Limits • Skewed analysis • Participatory blind spots 2.3 Arbitration 2.4 Exemplary Damages 2.5 Police whistleblowers and press contact 2.6 Data Protection 2.7 Online Press 2.8 Public Interest 3. THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK – A LEGAL ANALYSIS 3.1 A rushed and unconstitutional regime 3.2 The use of statute to regulate the press 3.3 The Royal Charter and the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 • The use of a Royal Charter • Reporting to Parliament • Arbitration • Apologies • Fines 3.4 The Crime and Courts Act 2013 • Freedom of expression • ‘Provided for by law’ • ‘Outrageous’ • ‘Relevant publisher’ • Exemplary damages and proportionality • Punitive costs and the chilling effect • Right to a fair trial • Right to not be discriminated against 3.5 The Press Recognition Panel 4. THE WIDER IMPACT 4.1 Self-regulation: the international norm 4.2 International response 4.3 The international impact on press freedom 5. RECOMMENDATIONS 6. CONCLUSION 3 , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY 4 , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY FOREWORD BY TIM LUCKHURST PRESS FREEDOM: RESTORING BRITAIN’S REPUTATION n January 2014 I felt honour bound to participate in a meeting, the very ‘Our liberty cannot existence of which left me saddened be guarded but by the and ashamed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the UK Television News Industry 1982 - 1998
    -iì~ '1,,J C.12 The Development of the UK Television News Industry 1982 - 1998 Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Alison Preston Deparent of Film and Media Studies University of Stirling July 1999 Abstract This thesis examines and assesses the development of the UK television news industry during the period 1982-1998. Its aim is to ascertain the degree to which a market for television news has developed, how such a market operates, and how it coexists with the 'public service' goals of news provision. A major purpose of the research is to investigate whether 'the market' and 'public service' requirements have to be the conceptual polarities they are commonly supposed to be in much media academic analysis of the television news genre. It has conducted such an analysis through an examination of the development strategies ofthe major news organisations of the BBC, ITN and Sky News, and an assessment of the changes that have taken place to the structure of the news industry as a whole. It places these developments within the determining contexts of Government economic policy and broadcasting regulation. The research method employed was primarily that of the in-depth interview with television news management, politicians and regulators: in other words, those instrumental in directing the strategic development within the television news industry. Its main findings are that there has indeed been a development of market activity within the television news industry, but that the amount of this activity has been limited by the particular economic attributes of the television news product.
    [Show full text]
  • New News, Future News the Challenges for Television News After Digital Switch-Over
    New News, Future News The challenges for television news after Digital Switch-over An Ofcom discussion document Publication date: 26 June 2007 Foreword The prospects for television news in a fully digital era are a central element in any consideration of the future of public service broadcasting (PSB). News is regarded by viewers as the most important of all the PSB genres, and television remains by far the most used source of news for UK citizens. The role of news and information as part of the democratic process is long established, and its status is specifically underpinned in the Communications Act 2003. This report, New News, Future News, is one of a series of Ofcom studies focussing on individual topics identified in the PSB Review of 2004/05, and further discussed in the Digital PSB report of July 2006. The others are on the provision of children’s programmes and on the prospects for a Public Service Publisher. All three studies are linked to areas of particular PSB concern for the future, and set out a framework for policy consideration ahead of the next full PSB review. Other Ofcom work of relevance includes the review of Channel 4’s funding. It has not been the role of this report to come up with solutions, and no policy recommendations are put forward. Instead, the report examines the environment in which television news currently operates, and assesses how that may change in future (after digital switch-over and, in 2014, the expiry of current Channel 3 and Channel 5 licences) . It identifies particular issues that will need to be addressed and suggests some specific questions that may need to be answered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wireless News
    The Wireless News © 2017 Bart Lee, K6VK For well over a century, radio has provided ships at sea and their well-off passengers with current news of the world (and at times, war news), market data and sports. From Marconi’s wireless telegraph to satellite delivery, the wireless news has been indispensible to voyagers of many sorts, especially on transoceanic routes. Steamship lines saw money to be made in providing this amenity. The technologies of commu- nications and of the printing of newspapers at sea paced each other. Many of these seagoing “newspapers” themselves tell nautical tales and social stories about their readers. But they also illumine their producers in Europe, North America, and Asia, including the shipping lines, the shoreside press, and the radiomen at sea. The radio technology evolved from long waves to satellites, and from spark sets to vacuum tube gear and then to modern solid-state circuits. A demand for current information at sea, far from its sources, created an important maritime revenue stream. The economics of news at sea and the higher socio-economic class of the passengers helped to further the development of the radio art. Introduction – Young Marconi should be preserved and a special edi- Started It tion of The Transatlantic Times was News for passengers and crew at sea, run off for the benefit of the Seamen’s sent through the ether by “wireless Fund at a dollar a copy. ‘Through the telegraphy,” started with Marconi, as courtesy of Mr. G. Marconi,’ it said, did so much else in radio (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • News Consumption in the UK: Research Report
    News consumption in the UK: research report 15 December 2015 Note: This report was reissued on 24 March 2017. It corrects a previous misallocation of Channel 5's wholesale and retail news, and includes other minor corrections to the dataset News consumption in the UK: contents Section Page 1 Platforms used for news nowadays 4 2 Multiple and single sourcing of news 10 3 News consumption via television 21 4 News consumption via radio 27 5 News consumption through newspapers 29 6 News consumption via internet 37 7 Local news use 50 8 Share of references 54 9 Attitudes towards news topics and reasons for following news 59 11 News consumption in the nations 69 2 Introduction This report provides the findings of Ofcom’s 2015 research into news consumption across television, radio, print and online. It is published as part of our range of market research publications that examine the consumption of content, and attitudes towards that content, across different platforms. The aim of this slide pack is to inform an understanding of news consumption across the UK, and within each UK nation. The report details various findings relating to the consumption of news; the sources and platforms used, the perceived importance of different outlets for news, attitudes to individual news sources, reasons to follow news, local news use, and news consumption in the nations. It provides details of our cross-platform news consumption metric – ‘share of references’. The report also compares findings related to news consumption with those from the past two years, where possible. An accompanying Executive Summary is available on the Ofcom website here: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/tv-radio/news-media/.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) È QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016 or ‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 001-35769 NEWS CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) Delaware 46-2950970 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (212) 416-3400 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non- accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Plurality, the Fox-Sky Bid, and the Case for Referral to Ofcom
    MEDIA POLICY BRIEF 18 Media plurality, the Fox-Sky bid, and the case for referral to Ofcom Steven Barnett University of Westminster Martin Moore Kings College, University of London Damian Tambini London School of Economics and Political Science 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The LSE Media Policy Project is funded by the Higher Education Innovation Fund 5, with additional support from the Open Society Foundation. LSE Media Policy Project Series Editor: Damian Tambini The authors would like to thank Nora Kroeger and all participants from the event “The 21st Century Fox Bid for Sky – How to respond to media monopolization in the UK” for their valuable input. Creative Commons Licence, Attribution – Non-Commercial. This licence lets others remix, tweak and build upon this work non-commercially. New works using this work must acknowledge the licensor and be non-commercial (you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made). You don’t have to license your derivative works on the same terms. March 2017 LSE Media Policy Project blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/ Suggested citation: Barnett, S., Moore, M., & Tambini, D. (2017). Media plurality, the Fox-Sky bid, and the case for referral to Ofcom. Media Policy Brief 18. London: Media Policy Project, London School of Economics and Political Science. 2 Contents Key messages ................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hacked Off Response: News Corp UK and Ireland Limited
    Hacked Off response: News Corp UK and Ireland Limited - Invitation to comment on a request to accept undertakings in place of conditions relating to its acquisition of The Times and The Sunday Times newspapers in 1981 Summary This response recommends that News UK’s application to accept new undertakings in place of the conditions should be rejected for the following reasons. 1. The specific additional clause to the undertakings proposed by News UK would: a. jeopardize quality and standards at the titles, and b. reduce media plurality. 2. Varying the conditions would be inappropriate in principle given that: a. There are historic allegations of editorial interference in the Times titles from the Murdoch family; b. The corporate governance failures at News UK-owned News of the World have never been properly investigated; and, c. Allegations of illegality at two other News UK titles, the Sunday Times and The Sun, have never been properly investigated. 3. Updating the “conditions” to the status of “undertakings”, even when applied only to certain sections, significantly reduces the sanctions available for non-compliance for all conditions; hence, particularly in the context of (2) above, any attempt to vary them should be rejected. 4. Finally, and in any case, News UK must publish the specific amendments it is proposing to the TNL Articles of Association as part of their application (paragraph 7.7), before any proper consideration of the implications and possible consequences can take place. This response is supported by a petition which has gathered 5393 signatures from the public. The text of the petition and list of signatories are appended to this submission.
    [Show full text]
  • Ofcom: an Evaluation of UK Broadcast Journalism Regulation of News And
    Chris Frost 3. ensuring a wide range of TV and radio services of high quality and wide appeal; 4. maintaining plurality in the provision of broadcasting; 5. applying adequate protection for audiences against offensive or harmful material; 6. applying adequate protection for audiences against unfairness or the infringement of privacy.1 Ofcom: An Ofcom is funded by fees from industry levied for regulating broadcasting and communica- evaluation of UK tions networks; and grant-in-aid from the gov- ernment. It is answerable to the UK Parliament broadcast journalism but is independent of the UK Government. regulation of news At a time when UK media regulation is under- and current affairs going its most critical assessment from the public and parliament, including the Leveson Recent revelations about journalism ethics in inquiry set up by the government in the wake the UK have thrown regulation of the media of the Milly Dowler phone hacking revelations into the spotlight with the Press Complaints and the closure of the News of the World, this Commission found wanting and suggestions paper will look at Ofcom’s activities. Although of change for the Office of Communication, broadcasting has so far largely avoided the the broadcast regulator, making this an ideal criticism heaped on the national press for ille- time to evaluate its performance. Amongst gal activities it is an ideal time to examine how other duties, Ofcom is responsible for accept- Ofcom carries out its regulatory duties enforc- ing and adjudicating complaints about edito- ing its obligation to protect viewers and listen- rial and programme content from viewers and ers (especially minors) from harmful or offen- listeners.
    [Show full text]
  • Agency Source Influence on Television Reporting: Case of Mururoa and Tahiti
    Asia Pacific Media ducatE or Issue 7 Article 2 7-1999 Agency source influence on television reporting: Case of Mururoa and Tahiti C. A. Paterson University of Leicester, UK Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/apme Recommended Citation Paterson, C. A., Agency source influence on television reporting: Case of Mururoa and Tahiti, Asia Pacific Media ducatE or, 7, 1999, 16-36. Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/apme/vol1/iss7/2 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Agency Source Influence On Television Foreign Reporting: Case Of Mururoa And Tahiti Broadcasters globally aredependent on the cotnmercial neuie agency uiitoteealers oftelevision pictures. By following the chronological development ofa story, thisarticle demonstrates hawframing determined in agency planning processes influences the stories told to audiences by broadcasters. It is hypothesised that news agency economic priorities drive international event coverage planning; that news-coverage 'frames N influence the news delivered to agency clients and the stories toldto audiences by broadcasters; and that wealthybroadcasters are more likely to localise their coverage of international events, while smaller broadcasters relayto their audiences strictly the stories told by agencies. TIle case oftheMururoa nuclear testingand Tahiti independence rioting ill 1995 are used to demonstrate that the reproduction of news frames manufactured by news agencies may be expected among broadcasters worldwide, diminishing the possibility of multiple interpretations of global events. Chris A. Paterson University ofLeicester, England his article draws on research concerning international news Tagencies to illustrate the influence of major sources on foreign news coverage.
    [Show full text]