Space Almanac

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Space Almanac 0.05 g 60,000 miles Geosynchronous Earth orbit 22,300 miles Hard vacuum 1,000 miles Medium Earth orbit begins 300 miles 0.95 g 100 miles Low Earth orbit begins 60 miles Astronaut wings awarded 50 miles Limit for ramjet engines 28 miles Limit for turbojet engines 20 miles Stratosphere begins 10 miles Earth NASA photo On the following pages appears a variety of information and statistical material about space—particularly military activity in space. This almanac was compiled by the staff of Air Force Magazine, with assistance and information from Dr. R. W. Stur- devant, Air Force Space Command History Office; Tina Thomp- son, editor of TRW Space Log; Phillip S. Clark, Molniya Space Consultancy, Whit- ton, UK; Theresa Foley; and Air Force Space Command Public Affairs Office. SpaceCompiled by Tamar A. Mehuron,Almanac Associate Editor Figures that appear in this section will not always agree because of different cutoff dates, rounding, or different methods of reporting. The information is intended to illustrate trends in space activity. Space Terms Ferret. A satellite whose Polar orbit. Earth orbit with a primary function is to gather 90° inclination. Spacecraft on electronic intelligence, such as this path could pass over every Aerospace. A physical region microwave, radar, radio, and Magnetosphere. A region spot on Earth as Earth rotates made up of Earth’s atmosphere voice emissions. dominated by Earth’s mag- under the satellite’s orbit (see and the space beyond. netic field, which traps charged orbital inclination). Geostationary Earth orbit. A particles, including those in the Aerospace plane. A reusuable geosynchronous orbit with 0° Van Allen belts. It begins in the Remote imaging. Images of spacecraft able to operate ef- inclination in which the space- upper atmosphere, where it Earth generated from a space- fectively in both the atmosphere craft circles Earth 22,300 miles overlaps the ionosphere, and craft that provide data for map- and space. Also known as a above the equator and appears extends several thousand miles ping, construction, agriculture, “transatmospheric vehicle” or, from Earth to be standing still. farther into space. oil and gas exploration, news more currently, “spaceplane.” media services, and the like. Geosynchronous Earth orbit Medium Earth orbit (MEO). Apogee. The point of great- (GEO). An orbit at 22,300 Flight path between LEO, Rocket. An aerospace vehicle est distance from Earth (or the miles that is synchronized with which ends at about 300 miles that carries its own fuel and moon, a planet, etc.) achieved Earth’s rotation. If a satellite in altitude, and GEO, which is at oxidizer and can operate out- by a body in elliptical orbit. Usu- GEO is not at 0° inclination, its an average altitude of 22,300 side Earth’s atmosphere. ally expressed as distance from ground path describes a figure miles. Earth’s surface. eight as it travels around Earth. Semisynchronous orbit. Mesosphere. A region of the An orbit set at an altitude of Atmosphere. Earth’s envelop- Geosynchronous transfer atmosphere about 30 to 50 12,834 miles. Satellites in this ing sphere of air. orbit (GTO). An orbit that miles above Earth’s surface. orbit revolve around Earth in originates with the parking orbit exactly 12 hours. Boost phase. Powered flight of Orbital decay. A condition in a ballistic missile—i.e., before and then reaches apogee at the GEO. which spacecraft lose orbital Single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) the rocket burns out. altitude and orbital energy system. A reusable single- Burn. The process in which Ground track. An imaginary because of aerodynamic drag stage rocket that can take off rocket engines consume fuel or line on Earth’s surface that and other physical forces. and land repeatedly and is able other propellant. traces the course of another to boost payloads into orbit. imaginary line between Earth’s Orbital inclination. Angle of That section Circumterrestrial space. “In- center and an orbiting satellite. flight path in space relative Stratosphere. ner space” or the atmospheric to the equator of a planetary of atmosphere about 10 to 30 region that extends from 60 High Earth orbit (HEO). Flight body. Equatorial paths are 0° miles above Earth’s surface. path above geosynchronous al- miles to about 50,000 miles from for flights headed east, 180° for An titude (22,300 to 60,000 miles Sun synchronous orbit. Earth’s surface. those headed west. orbit inclined about 98° to the from Earth’s surface). Constellation. A formation of Outer space. Space that equator and at LEO altitude. At satellites orbiting for a specific High-resolution imagery. De- extends from about 50,000 this inclination and altitude, a combined purpose. tailed representations of actual miles above Earth’s surface to satellite’s orbital plane always objects that satellites produce a distance of about 480,000 maintains the same relative Deep space. All space beyond electronically or optically on miles. orientation to the sun. the Earth-moon system, or from displays, film, or other visual The thin atmo- about 480,000 miles altitude devices. Parking orbit. Flight path in Thermosphere. outward. which spacecraft go into LEO, sphere about 50 to 300 miles Inertial upper stage. A two- circle the globe in a waiting above Earth’s surface. It expe- Eccentric orbit. An extremely stage solid-rocket motor used posture, and then transfer pay- riences dramatically increased elongated elliptical orbit. to propel heavy satellites into load to a final, higher orbit. levels of heat compared to the mission orbit. lower layers. Ecliptic plane. The plane Payload. Any spacecraft’s defined by the circle on the ce- Ionosphere. A region of elec- crew or cargo; the mission Transfer. Any maneuver that lestial sphere traced by the path trically charged thin air layers element supported by the changes a spacecraft orbit. of the sun. that begins about 30 miles spacecraft. A radar or radio above Earth’s atmosphere. Transponder. Elliptical orbit. Any non circular, Perigee. The point of minimum set that, upon receiving a des- closed spaceflight path. Low Earth orbit (LEO). Flight altitude above Earth (or the ignated signal, emits a radio Exosphere. The upper limits path between Earth’s atmo- moon, a planet, etc.) main- signal of its own. sphere and the bottom of the of Earth’s atmosphere, ranging tained by a body in elliptical The region of Van Allen belts, i.e., from about Troposphere. from about 300 miles altitude to orbit. the atmosphere from Earth’s 60 to 300 miles altitude. about 2,000 miles altitude. Period. The amount of time surface to about 10 miles Expendable launch vehicle a spacecraft requires to go above the equator and five (ELV). A launch vehicle that through one complete orbit. miles above the poles. This is cannot be reused after one where most clouds, wind, rain, flight. and other weather occurs. Van Allen belts. Zones of intense radiation trapped in Earth’s magnetosphere that could damage unshielded spacecraft. 20 AIR FORCE Magazine / August 1997 May 24 Atlas D/Agena A performs first spacebased de- July 20 Apollo 11 puts first booster places MIDAS II, first tection of a nuclear explosion. human, Neil A. Armstrong, on Space Firsts early warning satellite, in orbit. the moon. July 28, 1964 First close-up June 22 US performs first lunar pictures provided by November 14–24 US Apollo February 24, 1949 Project successful launch of multiple Ranger 7 spacecraft. 12 mission deploys first major Bumper, the first fully success- independently instrumented scientific experiments on the First Atlas/Agena ful two-stage rocket-launch satellites by a single rocket. August 14 moon and completes first into space, reaches a record D standard launch vehicle suc- acquisition of samples from an altitude of 244 miles. August 11 Capsule ejected cessfully fired from Vanden- earlier spacecraft—Surveyor 3. from Discoverer 13 parachutes berg AFB. July 24, 1950 Bumper-WAC into Pacific Ocean and be- February 11, 1970 Japan First space- becomes first missile launched comes first orbital payload ever March 18, 1965 launches first satellite, Osumi, walk conducted by Alexei from Cape Canaveral, Fla. recovered. from Kagoshima Space Center Leonov of Soviet Voskhod 2. using Lambda 4S solid-fuel September 20, 1956 US Ju- August 12 First passive com- Gemini 3 astronauts rocket. piter C rocket achieves record munications carried via Echo 1 March 23 Maj. Virgil I. “Gus” Grissom first flight, reaching an altitude satellite. January 31, 1971 Apollo 14 of 682 miles and landing 3,400 and Lt. Cmdr. John W. Young launched; its astronauts will miles from Cape Canaveral. August 19 Capsule containing complete world’s first piloted complete first manned landing first satellite photographs of orbital maneuver. on lunar highlands. August 21, 1957 First suc- Soviet Union ejected from Dis- Gemini 4 astronaut cessful launch of Soviet R7 coverer 14 becomes first orbital June 4 April 19 First space station, Maj. Edward H. White performs rocket, which six weeks later payload recovered in midair by Salyut 1, goes aloft. first American spacewalk. will loft Sputnik into orbit. C-119 Flying Boxcar. June 6 USSR’s Soyuz 11 per- July 14 Mariner provides the October 4 USSR launches January 31, 1961 Preparing forms first successful docking first close-up pictures of Mars. Sputnik 1, the first man-made for manned spaceflight, US with Salyut space station. satellite, into Earth orbit. launches a Mercury capsule August 21 Gemini 5 launched First British satel- carrying the chimpanzee Ham October 28 November 3 First animal in as first manned spacecraft lite, Prospero, launched into on a suborbital trajectory. orbit, a dog, is carried aloft by using fuel cells for electrical orbit on Black Arrow rocket. power rather than batteries.
Recommended publications
  • Russia's Posture in Space
    Russia’s Posture in Space: Prospects for Europe Executive Summary Prepared by the European Space Policy Institute Marco ALIBERTI Ksenia LISITSYNA May 2018 Table of Contents Background and Research Objectives ........................................................................................ 1 Domestic Developments in Russia’s Space Programme ............................................................ 2 Russia’s International Space Posture ......................................................................................... 4 Prospects for Europe .................................................................................................................. 5 Background and Research Objectives For the 50th anniversary of the launch of Sputnik-1, in 2007, the rebirth of Russian space activities appeared well on its way. After the decade-long crisis of the 1990s, the country’s political leadership guided by President Putin gave new impetus to the development of national space activities and put the sector back among the top priorities of Moscow’s domestic and foreign policy agenda. Supported by the progressive recovery of Russia’s economy, renewed political stability, and an improving external environment, Russia re-asserted strong ambitions and the resolve to regain its original position on the international scene. Towards this, several major space programmes were adopted, including the Federal Space Programme 2006-2015, the Federal Target Programme on the development of Russian cosmodromes, and the Federal Target Programme on the redeployment of GLONASS. This renewed commitment to the development of space activities was duly reflected in a sharp increase in the country’s launch rate and space budget throughout the decade. Thanks to the funds made available by flourishing energy exports, Russia’s space expenditure continued to grow even in the midst of the global financial crisis. Besides new programmes and increased funding, the spectrum of activities was also widened to encompass a new focus on space applications and commercial products.
    [Show full text]
  • ISS Presentation by Sergey Seyvald
    JSC ISS Corporate Presentation 27.04.2010 0 27.04.2010 All rights reserved - Ó JSC ISS - All rights reserved 1 ISS LOCATION ISS 27.04.2010 All rights reserved - Ó JSC ISS - All rights reserved 2 MORE THAN 50 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN SPACE • June 04, 1959 the affiliate of OKB-1 is established in Krasnoyarsk-26 • August 18, 1964 the first launch of in-house developed and manufactured Launcher 11K65 (COSMOS) A.G.Kozlov N.A.Testoyedov and three small-size satellites of COSMOS General General family (38, 39 and 40) Designer Designer and and General General Director Director • August 01, 1977 (1996-2006) (present time) establishment of NPO PM • 1997 NPO PM is renamed to academician M. F. M.F.Reshetnev Reshetnev’s NPO PM General Designer and General Director (1959- • March 03, 2008 1996) establishment of ISS-RESHETNEV COMPANY 27.04.2010 All rights reserved - Ó JSC ISS - All rights reserved 3 COMPANY STRUCTURE INTEGRATED STRUCTURE Joint - Stock Company «Academician M.F. Reshetnev» Information Satellite Systems» General Designer and General Director of JSC «ISS» Shareholders NPP «Geophizika-Cosmos», SIC «Polyus», Tomsk «GONETS», Moscow Moscow Reaction wheels, Battery electronic, Data relay service provider ADCS sensors Power Processing Unit based on LEO system Gonets. NPP «Kvant» ,Moscow «TTS – NPO PM», Zheleznogorsk NPP KP «Kvant», Rostov-na-Donu Solar arrays and batteries. EEE-parts screening and tests ADCS optical sensors «NPO PM – MKB», Zheleznogorsk SPS, Omsk «Sibpromproekt», Zheleznogorsk R&D in space and SADA, ADPM, control units Design and construction industrial facilities. space application on the ground «NPO PM – Razvitie», Zheleznogorsk Ground antenna systems 27.04.2010 4 COMPANY ORGANISATION General Designer & General Director N.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Transportation Association Roundtable "An Engineering Assessment of the Way-Forward in Human Spaceflight” September 9, 2010 Rayburn Building
    Space Transportation Association Roundtable "An Engineering Assessment of the Way-Forward in Human Spaceflight” September 9, 2010 Rayburn Building Thank you, Rich, for the opportunity to get together on this important topic with this group. Please let me begin with a disclaimer. While I am the Executive Director of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, by no means do I speak for the Institute. We have some 36,000 student and professional members – including all four of us on the panel. Our volunteer leadership establishes our policy positions, and to be candid, it is an extremely difficult process to get consensus on almost any subject. With a topic as filled with options and differing views as what we are talking about this morning, we consider our role to be to provide opportunities to debate issues and bring out technically sound perspectives rather than advocate positions. So, I’m afraid I will have to use the standard disclaimer that the views expressed are my own. 1 Over the past few years Mike and I have discussed various aspects of the space exploration portfolio. On some we have agreed, on some we have agreed to disagree. Mike will be on the AIAA election Ballot in a few months to run for the same position he had to resign when he was confirmed as Administrator of NASA – President‐Elect of AIAA. I think it is both a characteristic and strength of AIAA that the senior staff person and the person who was a month away from being my boss, and may be again, can engage in debate on issues and agree to disagree.
    [Show full text]
  • The Start of the Manned Space Race by Andrew J
    The Start of the Manned Space Race by Andrew J. LePage November 1998 Introduction of Sputnik 1 and 2 in October and November of 1957 changed everything. At the same time NACA and the USAF were studying manned spaceflight (see The Beginnings of The first Sputnik launches were to affect the manned America's Man in Space Program in the October space program in several ways. The impact the 1998 issue of SpaceViews), comparable efforts were launch of Sputnik 1 had on the West led Soviet quietly taking place independently in the Soviet Primer Nikita Khrushchev to exploit space missions Union . As with virtually every other aspect of the for their propaganda value. Development of more Soviet Union's early space program, Chief Designer advanced and spectacular missions like the manned Sergei P. Korolev and his OKB-1 (Experimental satellite program were immediately approved and Design Bureau No. 1) lead the way. All during the placed on the fast track. Also at the insistence of 1950s when Korolev and his colleague, Mikhail K. Khrushchev, Sputnik 2 was launched with a dog on Tikhonravov of NII-4 (Scientific Research Institute board. While thermal control problems marred the No. 4), were pushing their original Earth satellite mission, it did demonstrate that weightlessness would proposal, it also included plans to send probes to the not be a major hazard for a human (see Sputnik 2: Moon and men into orbit. When the satellite The First Animal in Space in the November 1997 proposal was finally adopted by the Soviet issue of SpaceViews). As a result, Korolev scrapped government on January 30, 1956, the lunar probe and his initial, more conservative approach and moved manned satellite projects were also given the green ahead with a much more aggressive plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretariat GENERAL ST/SG/SER.E/320 23 May 1997 ENGLISH ORIGINAL: RUSSIAN
    UNITED NATIONS ST Distr. Secretariat GENERAL ST/SG/SER.E/320 23 May 1997 ENGLISH ORIGINAL: RUSSIAN COMMITTEE ON THE PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE INFORMATION FURNISHED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CONVENTION ON REGISTRATION OF OBJECTS LAUNCHED INTO OUTER SPACE Note verbale dated 15 April 1997 from the Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the United Nations (Vienna) addressed to the Secretary-General The Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the United Nations (Vienna) presents its compliments to the Secretary-General of the United Nations and, in accordance with article IV of the Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space,* has the honour to transmit information concerning space objects launched by the Russian Federation from April to December 1996 and conce rning Russian space objects which ceased to exist within those same periods of time and are no longer in Earth orbit (see annex). *General Assembly resolution 3235 (XXIX), annex, of 12 November 1974. V.97-23994T ST/SG/SER.E/320 Page 2 ST/SG/SER.E/320 Page 3 ST/SG/SER.E/320 Page 4 ST/SG/SER.E/320 Page 5 ST/SG/SER.E/320 Page 6 ST/SG/SER.E/320 Page 7 ST/SG/SER.E/320 Page 8 ST/SG/SER.E/320 Page 9 Annex* REGISTRATION DATA ON SPACE OBJECTS LAUNCHED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN APRIL 1996 1. In April 1996, the Russian Federation launched the following space objects: Basic orbit characteristics Date of Apogee Perigee Inclination Period No. Name of space object launching (km) (km) (degrees) (minutes) General purpose of space object 2985 Priroda 23 April 347 220 51.6 89.9 The Priroda module is intended for the per- (launched by a Proton carrier rocket formance of research and experiments by the crew from the Baikonur launch site) of the Mir orbital station, partly under the programme of cooperation between the Russian Federation and the United States of America 2986 Cosmos-2332 24 April 1 585 304 83 104 The space object is intended for assignments on (launched by a Cosmos carrier rocket behalf of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian from the Plesetsk launch site) Federation 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture of Afterlife: Future Cemetery in Metropolis
    ARCHITECTURE OF AFTERLIFE: FUTURE CEMETERY IN METROPOLIS A DARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF ARCHITECTURE MAY 2017 BY SHIYU SONG DArch Committee: Joyce Noe, Chairperson William Chapman Brian Takahashi Key Words: Conventional Cemetery, Contemporary Cemetery, Future Cemetery, High-technology Innovation Architecture of Afterlife: Future Cemetery in Metropolis Shiyu Song April 2017 We certify that we have read this Doctorate Project and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality in partial fulfillment for the degree of Doctor of Architecture in the School of Architecture, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. Doctorate Project Committee ___________________________________ Joyce Noe ___________________________________ William Chapman ___________________________________ Brian Takahashi Acknowledgments I dedicate this thesis to everyone in my life. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my committee chair, Professor Joyce Noe, for her support, guidance and insight throughout this doctoral project. Many thanks to my wonderful committee members William Chapman and Brian Takahashi for their precious and valuable guidance and support. Salute to my dear professor Spencer Leineweber who inspires me in spirit and work ethic. Thanks to all the professors for your teaching and encouragement imparted on me throughout my years of study. After all these years of study, finally, I understand why we need to study and how important education is. Overall, this dissertation is an emotional research product. As an idealist, I choose this topic as a lesson for myself to understand life through death. The more I delve into the notion of death, the better I appreciate life itself, and knowing every individual human being is a bless; everyday is a present is my best learning outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Mice and Materials: Payoffs of UNSGC Research Infrastructure Awards
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Presentations Materials Physics 5-8-2017 Of Mice and Materials: Payoffs of UNSGC Research Infrastructure Awards JR Dennison Utah State Univesity Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mp_presentations Part of the Condensed Matter Physics Commons Recommended Citation Dennison, JR, "Of Mice and Materials: Payoffs of UNSGC Research Infrastructure Awards" (2017). Utah NASA Space Grant Consortium Annual Meeting. Presentations. Paper 168. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mp_presentations/168 This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the Materials Physics at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Presentations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Of Mice and Materials: Payoffs of UNSGC Research Infrastructure Awards J.R. Dennison Materials Physics Group Physics Department, Utah State University Utah NASA Space Grant Consortium Annual Meeting Weber State University May 8, 2017 To paraphrase Douglas Adams, “Space is [harsh]. You just won’t believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly [harsh] it is.” Interactions with this harsh space environment can modify materials and cause unforeseen and detrimental effects to spacecraft. The Poster Child for Space Environment Effects Ag coated Mylar with micrometeoroid impact USU MISSIE SUSpECS Logan, UT II Sample Tray Before After Complex dynamic interplay between space environment, satellite motion, and materials properties Facilities & Capabilities • Four ultrahigh vacuum chambers for electron emission tests equipped with electron, ion, and photon sources, detectors, and surface analysis capabilities. Sample Characterization & Preparation • Two high vacuum chambers for resistivity tests. • Bulk composition (AA, IPC). • High vacuum chamber for electrostatic breakdown tests.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Operations
    7. Operations 7.1 Ground Operations The Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS) team addressed the launch site integra- tion of the exploration systems. The team was fortunate to draw on expertise from members with historical and contemporary human space flight program experience including the Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Skylab, Apollo Soyuz Test Project, Shuttle, and International Space Station (ISS) programs, as well as from members with ground operations experience reaching back to the Redstone, Jupiter, Pershing, and Titan launch vehicle programs. The team had a wealth of experience in both management and technical responsibilities and was able to draw on recent ground system concepts and other engineering products from the Orbital Space Plane (OSP) and Space Launch Initiative (SLI) programs, diverse X-vehicle projects, and leadership in NASA/Industry/Academia groups such as the Space Propulsion Synergy Team (SPST) and the Advanced Spaceport Technology Working Group (ASTWG). 7.1.1 Ground Operations Summary The physical and functional integration of the proposed exploration architecture elements will occur at the primary launch site at the NASA Kennedy Space Center (KSC). In order to support the ESAS recommendation of the use of a Shuttle-derived Cargo Launch Vehicle (CaLV) and a separate Crew Launch Vehicle (CLV) for lunar missions and the use of a CLV for ISS missions, KSC’s Launch Complex 39 facilities and ground equipment were selected for conversion. Ground-up replacement of the pads, assembly, refurbishment, and/or process- ing facilities was determined to be too costly and time-consuming to design, build, outfit, activate, and certify in a timely manner to support initial test flights leading to an operational CEV/CLV system by 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012 February 2013 About FAA About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2013) NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation Dear Colleague, 2012 was a very active year for the entire commercial space industry. In addition to all of the dramatic space transportation events, including the first-ever commercial mission flown to and from the International Space Station, the year was also a very busy one from the government’s perspective. It is clear that the level and pace of activity is beginning to increase significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Debris: a Chronology
    NASA/TP-1999-208856 January 1999 Orbital Debris: A Chronology David S. F. Portree Houston, Texas Joseph P. Loftus, Jr Lwldon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas David S. F. Portree is a freelance writer working in Houston_ Texas Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................ iv Preface ........................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................... vii Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................ ix The Chronology ............................................................................................................. 1 1961 ......................................................................................................................... 4 1962 ......................................................................................................................... 5 963 ......................................................................................................................... 5 964 ......................................................................................................................... 6 965 ......................................................................................................................... 6 966 ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Space Weapons Earth Wars
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces. SpaceSpace WeaponsWeapons EarthEarth WarsWars Bob Preston | Dana J. Johnson | Sean J.A. Edwards Michael Miller | Calvin Shipbaugh Project AIR FORCE R Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Puissances Spatiales Qui Montent
    SOMMAIRE Les puissances spatiales qui montent Par Philippe VOLVERT 1 SOMMAIRE 2 SOMMAIRE Les puissances spatiales qui montent Par Philippe VOLVERT 3 SOMMAIRE SOMMAIRE SOMMAIRE ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 5 L’ESPACE AU PAYS DU SOLEIL LEVANT ..................................................................................................... 6 LES AMBITIONS CHINOISES ........................................................................................................................ 14 L’INDEPENDANCE SPATIALE INDIENNE ................................................................................................... 24 L’ESPACE ET LE RESTE DU MONDE ........................................................................................................... 29 LES GRANDES DATES DE L’ASTRONAUTIQUE JAPONAISE .................................................................... 36 LES GRANDES DATES DE L’ASTRONAUTIQUE CHINOISE ....................................................................... 39 LES GRANDES DATES DE L’ASTRONAUTIQUE INDIENNE........................................................................ 41 LES VOLS HABITES ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]