DOCSLIB.ORG

San Joaquin Valley Water Infrastructure Authority (Sjvwia))

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Joaquin Valley Water Infrastructure Authority (Sjvwia)) SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY WATER INFRASTRUCTURE AUTHORITY (SJVWIA)) Mission: To solicit grants under the competitive process established by the State of California pursuant to the Water Quality, Supply and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014 (“Act”) or any similar state or federal statutes or programs to fund water infrastructure improvement projects within the jurisdiction of some or all of the member Parties, and to administer the disbursement and expenditure of said funds on qualified infrastructure projects including but not limited to local surface storage projects, groundwater recharge projects and construction of the Temperance Flat Dam project. SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY WATER INFRASTRUCTURE AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS APRIL 2017 • Tulare County • City Member (Eastern Portion) Supervisor Steve Worthley, President • Mayor Victor Lopez – City of Orange Cove Supervisor Kuyler Crocker, Alternate • Council Member Jose Flores, Alternate, City of Clovis • Fresno County • City Member (Western Portion) Supervisor Buddy Mendes,Vice Pres. • Mayor Pro Tem Alvaro Preciado – City of Avenal • Mayor RAY LEON – City of Huron Supervisor Brian Pacheco, Alternate • Water Agency Member (Western Portion) • Kings County Supervisor Doug Verboon, Director • Executive Director Steve Chedester – San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Water Authority Supervisor Craig Pedersen, Alternate • Madera County • Dan Pope, Alternate, Westlands Water District Supervisor David Rogers, Director • Water Agency Member (Eastern Portion) --- Open Supervisor Brett Frazier, Alternate • Merced County • At Large • Mayor Robert Silva, City of Mendota Supervisor Jerry O’Banion, Director • Tribal Council Supervisor Lloyd Pareira, Alternate • Dan Casas, Lawyer – Table Mountain Rancheria • Angela Karst, Legal Counsel, Table Mountain Rancheria, Alternate Staff : Mario Santoyo, Executive Director [email protected] (559) 779-7595 Total = $7.545 billion State Flood Groundwater Management Sustainability $395m $900m Regional Water Reliability $810m Storage $2.7b Safe Drinking Water $520m Watershed Protection, Ecosystem Restoration and State Settlements $1.495b Water Recycling $725m North-of-the-Delta Offstream Storage (Sites Reservoir) Los Vaqueros Expansion Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage 6 Federal Feasibility Process Public Reports . 2016 Final Feasibility Report & EIS . 2014 Draft EIS . 2014 Draft Feasibility Report . 2008 Plan Formulation Report . 2005 Initial Alts Information Report . 2004 Scoping Report . 2003 Phase 1 Investigation Report Valley groups, feds seek funds to build Temperance Flat dam Critical Temperance Flat Agreement Signed Temperance Flat Dam Now Closer To Reality After Agreement Signing Posted on July 1, 2016 FRESNO COUNTY Fresno officials propose joint venture in creating more water storage Sailing forward with water storage Solidarity for construction of Temperance Flat Dam near Millerton Lake Four Water Agencies Sign Agreement Stating Temperance Flat Reservoir Cooperation S[n Jo[quin V [ll_y W[t_r Infr[stru]tur_ @uthority Why Was The Friant Division Necessary? DEID Friant Division Deliveries and Groundwater Elevation Change Avg. Depth to Groundwater Friant Division Delivery -75 3.5 -95 3.0 -115 2.5 -135 2.0 -155 1.5 Acre) -175 1.0 -195 0.5 Average toDepth Groundwater (feet) -215 Friant (Acre Deliveries Division Feet per -235 0.0 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Ground Water Levels Dropping Land Subsidence • Friant Division Class 2 Water Supply and Groundwater Storage Relationship Cumulative Groundwater Storage Change SJR Restoration Settlement Friant Dam Restoration Base Flows* Riparian Flows (Current Release) and Full Restoration Flows Interim Flows Begin 2009 Full Restoration Flows Required by January 1, 2014 Riparian Flow Full Restoration Release 700 650 600 550 500 450 (TAF) 400 556 350 300 356 Release 250 248 200 184 150 71 100 0 Annual Cumulative Friant Dam Dam Friant Cumulative Annual 50 117 117 117 117 117 117 0 Critical Critical Dry Dry Year Normal-Dry Normal- Wet Year Low Year Year Year Wet Year Hydrologic Water Year Type * "Buffer Flows" of up to 10% of Base flows may be added in any year Approximately 20% Of Annual Friant Water Supply And A Project Cost Of Approximately $800 Million In River Channel Work Millerton Lake Friant Dam Flood Releases Over a Million Acre Feet Lost Flood Releases From Friant Dam Existing Conditions Inflow Friant Dam 1,800 TAF/yr Millerton Lake 450,000 Acre-Ft 520 TAF Average Annual Flood (385 TAF Active) Releases To San Joaquin River * * Based on the past 30 years, a total of approximately 14 million acre-feet has been lost to flood releases, which is equivalent to approximately 90 years of water supply for the City of Fresno. After Project Conditions El. 985…………..1.33 MAF El. 730…………..325 TAF Temp Millerton Lake Flat El. 670…………..200 TAF Dam Friant El. 600….......100 TAF El. 580.6….450 TAF Dam El. 550…….340 TAF Temperance Flat Friant Reservoir Dam El. 470……125 TAF The TSC will prepare an operating plan for TFR that will: Improve the management of flood flows for groundwater recharge in the Friant Division Stabilize West‐Side water supplies by managing multiple‐year CVP allocations Provide storage for purchased drought‐ protection supplies Reduce potential for Exchange Contract calls on Friant Division facilities Enhance water temperature and flow conditions in San Joaquin River Increase recapture of San Joaquin River Restoration Flows Diversify San Joaquin Valley refuge water supplies Integrate Temperance Flat with system‐ wide CVP operations Identify additive benefits with other projects, such as California WaterFIx AUGUST 14TH, 2017 Non‐Federal Commitment FWA $50,000 SJRECWA $50,000 SL&DMWA $50,000 SJVWIA $50,000 Total $200,000 Total $ 757,181 Non‐Federal Commitment $ 200,000 Remaining Funding Required $ 557,181 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Native Sustainment: the North Fork Mono Tribe's
    Native Sustainment The North Fork Mono Tribe's Stories, History, and Teaching of Its Land and Water Tenure in 1918 and 2009 Jared Dahl Aldern Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy from Prescott College in Education with a Concentration in Sustainability Education May 2010 Steven J. Crum, Ph.D. George Lipsitz, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member Margaret Field, Ph.D. Theresa Gregor, Ph.D. External Expert Reader External Expert Reader Pramod Parajuli, Ph.D. Committee Chair Native Sustainment ii Copyright © 2010 by Jared Dahl Aldern. All rights reserved. No part of this dissertation may be used, reproduced, stored, recorded, or transmitted in any form or manner whatsoever without written permission from the copyright holder or his agent(s), except in the case of brief quotations embodied in the papers of students, and in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Requests for such permission should be addressed to: Jared Dahl Aldern 2658 East Alluvial Avenue, #103 Clovis, CA 93611 Native Sustainment iii Acknowledgments Gratitude to: The North Fork Mono Tribe, its Chairman, Ron Goode, and members Melvin Carmen (R.I.P.), Lois Conner, Stan Dandy, Richard Lavelle, Ruby Pomona, and Grace Tex for their support, kindnesses, and teachings. My doctoral committee: Steven J. Crum, Margaret Field, Theresa Gregor, George Lipsitz, and Pramod Parajuli for listening, for reading, and for their mentorship. Jagannath Adhikari, Kat Anderson, Steve Archer, Donna Begay, Lisa
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation
    Draft Feasibility Report Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Prepared by: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation January 2014 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Executive Summary The Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage This Draft Feasibility Report documents the Investigation (Investigation) is a joint feasibility of alternative plans, including a range feasibility study by the U.S. Department of of operations and physical features, for the the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation potential Temperance Flat River Mile 274 (Reclamation), in cooperation with the Reservoir. California Department of Water Resources Key Findings to Date: (DWR). The purpose of the Investigation is • All alternative plans would provide benefits to determine the potential type and extent of for water supply reliability, enhancement of Federal, State of California (State), and the San Joaquin River ecosystem, and other resources. regional interest in a potential project to • All alternative plans are technically feasible, expand water storage capacity in the upper constructible, and can be operated and San Joaquin River watershed for improving maintained. water supply reliability and flexibility of the • Environmental analyses to date suggest that water management system for agricultural, all alternative plans would be urban, and environmental uses; and environmentally feasible.
    [Show full text]
  • Temperance Flat Reservoir
    Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Temperance Flat Reservoir Surface Storage Option Technical Appendix to the Phase 1 Investigation Report A Joint Study by: Bureau of Reclamation California Department Mid-Pacific Region of Water Resources In Coordination with: The California Bay-Delta Authority October 2003 Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation San Joaquin River looking downstream towards Millerton Lake Temperance Flat Reservoir Surface Storage Option Technical Appendix to the Phase 1 Investigation Report A Joint Study by: Bureau of Reclamation California Department Mid-Pacific Region of Water Resources In Coordination with: Prepared by: The California Bay-Delta Authority October 2003 Surface Water Storage Option Technical Memorandum TEMPERANCE FLAT RESERVOIR UPPER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN STORAGE INVESTIGATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................... viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................... ES-1 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 1-1 STORAGE OPTIONS SUMMARY.....................................................................................1-1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS................................................................1-4 POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS.........................................................................................1-4 RM 274 Options..............................................................................................................1-4
    [Show full text]
  • California Water and the Rhetoric of Crisis
    UC Berkeley Berkeley Planning Journal Title California Water and the Rhetoric of Crisis Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6gg4203t Journal Berkeley Planning Journal, 23(1) ISSN 1047-5192 Author Pollak, Josh Publication Date 2010 DOI 10.5070/BP32318173 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California 1 California Water and the Rhetoric of Crisis By Josh Pollak Abstract Water management in California has always been politically charged and fraught with controversy. In the summer of 2009, the last year of a three-year drought, a specific type of “water crisis” emerged in political rhetoric, in which constructing new dams and lifting protections for endangered fish species could solve California’s water problems. This piece critically examines these claims by presenting a brief background on how water is used and managed in California, highlighting the disconnect between the cost to deliver water and the price users pay, and explaining misconceptions that led endangered species protections to be attacked. California needs to take a proactive stance in water management by examining how water is currently allocated, reforming our water rights system, and dealing with difficult water issues before they reach a “crisis” level. Keywords: Water crisis; California water; water management; water infrastructure; water allocation “California’s water system is in a crisis.” -Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) “Our water crisis underscores the urgent need to update California’s water infrastructure so we are able to capture excess rain in wet years and have the necessary reserves in dry years like this one.” -California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, February 2009 “The San Joaquin Valley continues to face a water crisis in which our water supplies have become inadequate to meet expanding needs .
    [Show full text]
  • Temperance Flat Dam Referenced Fact Sheet
    F EBRUARY 5 , 2021 The Temperance Flat Dam Is Costly and Produces Little Water Reclamation’s Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation (USJBRSI) The proposed Temperance Flat dam has long been proposed to be constructed on the San Joaquin River Gorge. Decades later, it was one of the CALFED storage projects proposed for further investigation by the state/federal CALFED program in the year 2000 CALFED Record of Decision.1 Under its general authorities, the FY 2003 omnibus appropriations bill, and the 2004 Water Supply, Reliability, and Environmental Improvement Act,2 the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), the owner of the federal Central Valley Project (CVP), undertook and completed a draft feasibility report3 and draft environmental impact statement4 for the Temperance Flat Dam (TFD) in 2014. The dam was conceived to be located in the San Joaquin River Gorge,5 in the upstream part of Reclamation’s Millerton Reservoir, a reservoir impounded by Friant Dam.6 Four7 and then five8 different dam operational scenarios were under study, but Reclamation was unable to identify any preferred alternatives9 because of serious unresolved issues10 and a number of project uncertainties.11 Reclamation’s action alternatives all featured construction of a 665 foot-high dam,12 which would be the second tallest dam in California. It would have the capacity to store an additional 1.26 million acre-feet (MAF) of water.13 But regardless of the alternative, Reclamation found that it would produce relatively little new water14 and could cost state and federal taxpayers and water users billions of dollars.15 In addition, there were significant environmental impacts to the scenic San Joaquin River Gorge identified, as well as to the river and its resources downstream of Friant Dam in the view of resource experts outside of Reclamation.
    [Show full text]
  • NRDC on the 2014 Draft
    Natural Resources Defense Council The Bay Institute American Rivers Audubon California California Sportfishing Protection Alliance Friends of the River October 27, 2014 Melissa Harris Project Manager U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Planning Division 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, CA 95825-1893 Sent via U.S. Mail and via email to [email protected] RE: Comments on the Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Draft Environmental Impact Statement Dear Ms. Harris: On behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Bay Institute, American Rivers, Audubon California, the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Friends of the River, and our hundreds of thousands of members and activists in California, we are writing to provide comments on the Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Draft Environmental Impact Statement (“DEIS”). The DEIS fails to adequately assess the potential impacts of constructing and operating new storage at Temperance Flat, and even its flawed analysis demonstrates that the alternatives will result in significant adverse environmental impacts. Yet the document fails to consider feasible mitigation measures to address the significant environmental impacts that are likely to result from the alternatives analyzed in the DEIS. Overall, as documented in detail in the pages that follow, the DEIS fails to comply with the requirements of CEQA and NEPA. In particular, the DEIS: Fails to consider a reasonable range of alternatives; Fails to incorporate climate change into the operational modeling
    [Show full text]
  • California Voters OK'd Billions for Water Projects. Where Are the New
    7/21/2021 New CA dams, water reservoirs move slowly as drought worsens | The Sacramento Bee California voters OK’d billions for water projects. Where are the new dams, reservoirs? BY DALE KASLER AND RYAN SABALOW JULY 21, 2021 12:00 AM, UPDATED 2 MINUTES AGO Listen to this article now 17:57 Powered by Trinity Audio MAXWELL It doesn’t look like much now, a dry and dusty valley surrounded by the modest mountains of California’s Coast Range. This story is a subscriber exclusive https://www.sacbee.com/news/california/water-and-drought/article252514453.html 1/21 7/21/2021 New CA dams, water reservoirs move slowly as drought worsens | The Sacramento Bee These barren, brown hills an hour northwest of Sacramento will be the future home of Sites Reservoir, one of the few major water projects to be built in California since the 1970s. California taxpayers are helping pay for Sites, which would hold more water than Folsom Lake, through a $7.1 billion bond they approved during the 2014 election. With the state facing a potentially catastrophic drought, leaders of the Sites Project Authority say the reservoir would dramatically improve California’s water supplies. “If Sites were open today, we’d have nearly 1 million acre feet of water for farms, the environment, cities,” said the authority’s executive director Jerry Brown (no relation to the former governor). But here’s the thing: Sites isn’t ready to open today, tomorrow or anytime soon. Mired in red tape and struggling with rising costs, even after the project was downsized, the reservoir isn’t scheduled to begin construction until 2024 and wouldn’t begin filling until 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydropower Technical Appendix
    Hydropower Hydropower Technical Appendix UPPER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN STORAGE INVESTIGATION Initial Alternatives Information Report Hydropower Technical Appendix TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................. 1-1 STUDY AREA.........................................................................................................................1-2 SURFACE WATER STORAGE MEASURES CONSIDERED IN THE IAIR ...........................1-3 ORGANIZATION OF THIS TECHNICAL APPENDIX.............................................................1-3 CHAPTER 2. EXISTING AND FUTURE WITHOUT-PROJECT CONDITIONS......... 2-1 HYDROPOWER BACKGROUND ..........................................................................................2-1 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE................................................................................................2-1 EXISTING HYDROPOWER FACILITIES IN THE UPPER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN....2-5 Friant Dam and Millerton Lake ............................................................................................2-9 Friant Power Project............................................................................................................2-9 PG&E Kerckhoff Hydroelectric Project ..............................................................................2-10 Kerckhoff No. 2 Powerhouse .........................................................................................2-10 Kerckhoff Dam and Lake................................................................................................2-11
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Fresno COG One Voice Priority Submissions
    2016 Fresno COG One Voice Priority Submissions White Papers as submitted Page Water Policy Support................................................................................................ 3 Community Services Block Grant .............................................................................. 6 Pest Prevention and Exclusion of Pests Programs ................................................... 13 Agriculture Canine Inspection ................................................................................... 15 Expand Drip Irrigation Funding Opportunities to Tenants.......................................... 18 Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act – Goods Movement ................ 20 High Speed Rail Training Facilities ........................................................................... 25 Air and Health Quality Empowerment Zone Designation .......................................... 28 Clean Air Act Modernization ...................................................................................... 30 Establish Uniform Workforce Policies in the U.S. DOT ............................................. 33 Support Continued and Increased Funding of the CDBG.......................................... 35 Continuation of Payments-In-Lieu-of-Taxes (PILT) ................................................... 39 DOE Funding for Weatherization and Solar PV Installation ...................................... 42 Future Funding for the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) .............. 45 1 County of Fresno 2016
    [Show full text]
  • Temperance Flat Dam Factsheet
    M AY 1 2 , 2016 The Temperance Flat Dam Is Costly and Produces Little Water The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), the owner of the federal Central Valley Project (CVP), has completed a draft feasibility report1 and an environmental impact statement2 for the Temperance Flat Dam (TFD), conceived to be located in the upstream part of Reclamation’s Millerton Reservoir3 in the San Joaquin River Gorge.4 Four5 and then five6 different dam operational scenarios were under study, but Reclamation was unable to identify any preferred alternatives7 because of serious unresolved issues8 and a number of project uncertainties.9 Reclamation’s action alternatives all featured construction of a 665 foot-high dam with capacity to store an additional 1.26 million acre-feet (MAF) of water.10 But regardless of the alternative, it is clear that the dam produces relatively little new water11 and could cost state and federal taxpayers and water users billions of dollars.12 In addition, there are significant environmental impacts to the scenic San Joaquin River Gorge, as well as to the river and its resources downstream of Friant Dam in the view of resource experts outside of Reclamation. Key issues concerning the Temperance Flat project include: Water Capacity and Yield – Although the TFD could store up to 1.331 MAF13 of water, Reclamation concluded that the new dam would increase average annual water deliveries by only 61,000-87,000 acre- feet (depending on the emphasis of the operational scenario).14 The potential front runner was modeled to produce
    [Show full text]
  • Upper San Joaquin Basin Storage Investigation
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 OCT 3 \l {'.i;, David G. Murillo Regional Director Bureau ofReclamation, Mid-Pacific Region 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, CA 95825-1898 Subject: Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Fresno and Madera Counties, California [CEQ# 20140260] Dear Mr. Murillo: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for · the Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation. Our review and comments are pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, Council on Enviromnental Quality regnlations (40 CFR Pa.tis 1500- 1508), and our NEPA review authority under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. This DEIS tiers from the CALFED Record ofDecision signed in 2000, at1d analyzes one of the five surface water storage studies reconm1ended in the 2000 ROD, a dam and reservoir at Temperance Flat River Mile 274. The DEIS evaluates five action alternatives that vary in tetms of the cai-ryover storage targets of Temperance Flat Reservoir at1d Millerton Lalce, allocation and conveyance routing of water among various users, and intake feature configurations. We understand that Reclamation plans to identify a preferred alternative in the Final EIS. Based on our review ofthe DEIS, we have rated all the Action Alternatives and the document as Environmental Objections - lnsiifficient Information (EO-2). Please see the enclosed "Summary of EPA Rating Definitions." Our rating is based on the project's significant impacts to aquatic resources and water quality. The DEIS identifies that the project would impact 245 acres ofwaters ofthe United States, 9 miles ofriverine habitat, and 5,757 acres of oalc woodland; however, the DEIS does not identify or discuss sufficient mitigation for these impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Trucking Industry Next in Line for Uber 'Disruption'
    Y R ARA RS www.thebusinessjournal.com VE NI UPDATED DAILY ANNIVERSARAN thebusinessjournal.com AUG 25, 2017 THE FOCUS | 8 Trucking industry next in line for Uber ‘disruption’ David Castellon – STAFF WRITER Say what you want about Uber, but the online company that popularized ridesharing has managed to turn industries on its ears. It began with disrupting taxi and car services, offering people a way to order rides from drivers using their own cars. Business of Sports From that not-so-humble beginning, the company created Roundup UberRUSH, a package-deliver service available in some cities, and UberEATS, in which drivers deliver food from restaurants to homes and offices, including many in Fresno. And on Aug. 3, the company formally announced its latest venture — a service connecting truck THE EXECUTIVE drivers with people needing to move freight — PROFILE | 9 was launching in California. Quiet start Uber Freight began quietly late last fall in Texas, where 11 percent of the nation’s truck freight travels, to test out the concept, said Jeff Ogren, head of driver community and partnerships Trucking | 3 PHOTO ILLUSTRATION BY LEAH CANSECO-DECKER | Uber Freight just recently launched in California, but loads must originate in the Los Angeles, San Francisco or Sacramento areas. Edward Papulias CEO Pappy’s Fine Foods Infant of Prague making Valley areas tops in families, caring for parents industrial solar installation THE LIST | 10 David Castellon – STAFF WRITER Dragonfly Golf Club New installations of solar panels for industrial buildings tops the Golf Courses dropped by about half in Fresno County last year compared to list 2016, but it still was more than what was installed in any other California metro areas.
    [Show full text]