DOCSLIB.ORG

Quichua Bolivar Cachisagua Quichua Chimborazo Troje Quichua Cotopaxi Tigua Quichua Tungurahua Salasaca Quichua Cotopaxi Papaurco

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quichua Bolivar Cachisagua Quichua Chimborazo Troje Quichua Cotopaxi Tigua Quichua Tungurahua Salasaca Quichua Cotopaxi Papaurco QUICHUA BOLIVAR CACHISAGUA QUICHUA CHIMBORAZO TROJE QUICHUA COTOPAXI TIGUA QUICHUA TUNGURAHUA SALASACA QUICHUA COTOPAXI PAPAURCO QUICHUA COTOPAXI COMPANIA GRANDE QUICHUA TUNGURAHUA GUAPANTE QUICHUA LOJA QUICHUA CHIMBORAZO NIZAG QUICHUA AZUAY QUICHUA CANYAR QUICHUA PICHANCHA QUICHUA IMBABURA 2 QUECHUA IMBABURA INGA QUECHUA NAPO LOWLAND QUECHUA CHACHAPOYAS QUECHUA DOLTO AMAZONAS CHIMBORAZO QUICHUA SERENA TROJE INGA PUTUMAYO QUECHUA PASTAZA Que.QUECHUAN CHACPAR CHACPAR HUANUCO YANAC CHETILLA INKAWASI QUECHUA DE LAMBAYEQUE QUECHUA CUSCO COLLAO QUECHUA DE CUSCO QUECHUA AYACUCHO LARAOS QUECHUA AYACUCHO 2 ATALLA MARAGUA POCONA CURVA TAQUILE CUZCO GNL PUNO CITY QUECHUA DE HUANUCO QUECHUA NORTH JININ QUECHUA DE LA NACION WANKA QUECHUA HUAYLAS ANCASH HUACANA PUKI SULLKATITI TITIRI SULLKATITI TITIRI SOUTHERN AYMARA CENTRAL AYMARA Aym.AYMARAN JAQARU JAQARU 2 CENTRAL AYMARA 2 JAQARU 3 KAWKI CAYAPA COLORADO AWA PIT Bar.BARBACOAN GUAMBIANO TOTORO ALSEA OC.ALSEA SIUSLAW OC.SIUSLAWAN BEOTHUK Beo.BEOTHUK COFAN Cof.COFAN CAVINENA 1 CAVINENA 2 TACANA Tac.TACANAN ARAONA ESE EJJA HUARAYO ESE EJJA KONIBO KULINA PANO KULINA PANO MATIS MATSES KAXARARI POYANAWA ARARA PANO YAWANAWA YAMINAWA KAXINAWA KATUKINA PANO MARUBO Pan.PANOAN SHANENAWA SHARANAHUA AMAHUACA HUARIAPANO CAPANAHUA CHACOBO SHIPIBO CASHIBO KASHIBO SAN ALEJANDRO KASHIBO BAJO AGUAYTIA KASHIBO ALTO AGUAYTIA KASHIBO SUNGAROYACU NEZ PERCE Pen.SAHAPTIAN UMATILLA SAHAPTIN MOLALA Pen.MOLALA UMATILLA SAHAPTIN MOLALA Pen.MOLALA KLAMATH Pen.KLAMATH-MODOC ARAPAHO Alg.ALGONQUIAN CHEYENNE WIYOT Alg.WIYOT YUROK Alg.YUROK BLACKFOOT KASKASKIA ILLINOIS MICMAC PASSAMAQUODDY MALISEET UnnamedInSource OJIBWA SEVERN UnnamedInSource OJIBWE MINNESOTA OJIBWA EASTERN OTTAWA ALGONQUIN CHIPPEWA POTAWATOMI MOHEGAN ABNAKI EASTERN Alg.ALGONQUIAN ABNAKI WESTERN SHAWNEE WAMPANOAG NATICK MONTAGNAIS NASKAPI ATIKAMEKW ATIKAMEKW DELAWARE MUNSEE UNAMI UnnamedInSource MAHICAN MIAMI MENOMINEE FOX KICKAPOO TAKELMA Tak.TAKELMA RIKBAKTSA MGe.RIKBAKTSA PAEZ Pae.PAEZAN LEKO Lec.LECO MICHIF Alg.ALGONQUIAN TUNICA Tun.TUNICA ANDAQUI Bar.ANDAQUI HUPA HUPA 2 KATO MATTOLE BEAVER GALICE SARCEE CARRIER CHIPEWYAN JICARILLA APACHE JICARILLA APACHE NAVAJO NDe.ATHAPASKAN CHIRICAHUA LIPAN NAVAHO JICARILLA SAN CARLOS C CARRIER KUTCHIN DOGRIB HARE TANACROSS HUAVE SAN FRANCISCO DEL MAR HUAVE Hua.HUAVEAN HUAVE 2 CHITIMACHA Cht.CHITIMACHA PAPANTLA TOTONAC TOTONAC HIGHLAND TOTONAC COYUTLA TOTONAC OZELONACAXTLA TOTONAC COATEPEC TOTONAC OLINTLA TOTONAC FILOMENA MATA Tot.TOTONACAN TOTONAC UPPER NEXACA TOTONAC TEJERIA TOTONAC TEJERIA XICOTEPEC TOTONAC TOTONAC MISANTLA TEPEHUA TLACHICHILCO TEPEHUA HUEHUETLA TEPEHUA PISA FLORES TAPACHULTEC NORTH HIGHLAND MIXE ULTERIOR MIXE C LOWLAND MIXE SAYULA POPOLUCA OLUTA POPOLUCA AYUTLA MIXE SOUTH HIGHLAND MIXE MZ.MIXE-ZOQUE SOTEAPAN ZOQUE TEXISTEPEC ZOQUE MARIA CHIMALAPA MIGUEL CHIMALAPA ZOQUE RAYON CHIAPAS ZOQUE ZOQUE FRANCISCO LEON YAGUA 2 YAGUA 3 PY.PEBA-YAGUAN YAGUA SHASTA Hok.SHASTA SHASTA Hok.SHASTA ZAPARO ARABELA Zap.ZAPAROAN CAHUARANO IQUITO KAMSA Cam.CAMSA CHINANTEC SAN FELIPE USILA LEALAO CHINANTEC CHINANTEC SOCHIAPAN OM.CHINANTECAN CHINANTEC OJITLAN CHINANTEC PALANTLA QUIOQUITANI QUIERI ZAPOTEC XANAGUIA ZAPOTEC ZAPOTEC MIXTEPEC AMATLAN ZAPOTEC AYOQUESCO ZAPOTEC SAN PEDRO QUIATONI ZAPOTEC ZAPOTEC MITLA SANTA MARIA QUIEGOLANI ZAPOTEC TEXMELUCAN ZAPOTEC ZAPOTEC YALALAG CAJONOS ZAPOTEC ZAPOTEC YATZACHI ZAPOTEC ZOOGOCHO COATLAN LOXICHA ZAPOTEC OM.ZAPOTECAN ZAPOTEC LOXICHA COATLAN LOXICHA ZAPOTEC OM.ZAPOTECAN ZAPOTEC LOXICHA LACHIXIO ZAPOTEC SANTA INES YATZECHI ZAPOTEC TILQUIAPAN ZAPOTEC OCOTLAN ZAPOTEC ZAPOTEC SIERRA DE JUAREZ ISTHMUS ZAPOTEC CHOAPAN ZAPOTEC ALOAPAM ZAPOTEC YARENI ZAPOTEC ZAPOTEC SAN LUCAS QUIAVINI CHATINO TATALTEPEC CHATINO WESTERN HIGHLAND ZACATEPEC CHATINO AMUZGO OM.AMUZGOAN JICAQUE Tol.TOL HANIS COOS OC.COOSAN OFAYE MGe.OPAYE TEWA ARIZONA TEWA SAN JUAN PUEBLO TIWA NORTHERN PICURIS TIWA NORTHERN TAOS KT.KIOWA-TANOAN TIWA SOUTHERN JEMEZ KIOWA JEMEZ KIOWA KAROK Kar.KAROK MAYO LOS CAPOMOS YAQUI 2 MAYO UA.CAHITA YAQUI OPATA CENTRAL TARAHUMARA HUARIJIO UA.TARAHUMARAN GUARIJIO WARIHIO EL NAYAR CORA UA.CORACHOL HUICHOL TUBAR UA.TUBAR TOHONO OODHAM UPPER PIMA PIMA BAJO NORTHERN TEPEHUAN UA.TEPIMAN LOWER PIMA SOUTHERN TEPEHUAN TEPECANO CAHUILLA CUPENO LUISENO UA.TAKIC GABRIELINO GABRIELINO KITANEMUK TUBATULABAL UA.TUBATULABAL HOPI UA.HOPI SOUTHERN PAIUTE UTE SOUTHERN PAIUTE KAWAIISU UTE 1 UTE 2 NORTHERN PAIUTE UA.NUMIC WESTERN MONO COMANCHE SHOSHONI PANAMINT TUMPISA COMECRUDO Com.COMECRUDAN POCHUTLA NAHUATL PIPIL NAHUATL SAN FRANCISCO TLALNEPANTLA TETELCINGO NAHUATL NAHUATL XOXOCOTLA PUENTE DE IXTLA NAHUATL TLALNEPANTLA TAMAZUNCHALE NAHUATL XILITLA NAHUATL CUATLAMAYAN ANTONIO SANTOS NAHUATL COXCATLAN NAHUATL COXCATLAN NAHUATL HUEYATI YAHUALICA NAHUATL XOCHIATIPAN NAHUATL IXHUATLAN DE MADERO NAHUATL CUAMELC0 TIANGUISTENGO NAHUATL LAS BALSAS NAHUATL LA REFORMA TEPEHUACAN DE GUERRERO NAHUATL BUENOS AIRES ALAMO NAHUATL CHICONTEPEC NAHUATL CHINANCAHUATL ZACUALTIPAN NAHUATL ZAHUASTIPAN SAN AUGUSTIN METZQUITITLAN NAHUATL MONTEGRANDE PLATON SANCHEZ NAHUATL AYOTOXCO NAHUATL REYES DE VALLARTA TUZAMAPAN NAHUATL CHIGNAUTLA NAHUATL IXTACAMAXTITLAN NAHUATL CHILOCOYO HUEHUETLA HIGHLAND PUEBLA NAHUATL NAHUATL SIERRA DE ZACAPOAXTLA NAHUATL PAJAPAN NAHUATL MECAYAPAN TABASCO NAHUATL CUPILCO NAHUATL CHILACACHAPA CUETZALA DEL PROGRESO NAHUATL COATEPEC COSTALES TELEOLOAPAN NAHUATL COATEPEC COSTALES NAHUATL COATEPEC COSTALES NAHUATL SAN AGUSTIN DE BUENAVENTURA NAHUATL QUETZALAPA AZOYU NAHUATL CHICHIQUILA NAHUATL SANTA MARIA TEOPOXCO NAHUATL XILOCUAUTLA HUAUCHINANGO NAHUATL HUATLATLAUCA NAHUATL SAN MIGUEL AYOTLA NAHUATL JICOCINGO ZACATLAN NAHUATL SAN PABLO ZOQUITLAN NAHUATL HUITZILTEPEC ZUMPANGO DEL RIO NAHUATL SAN AGUSTIN OAPAN NAHUATL XAALITLA TEPECUAUILCO NAHUATL ZITLALA NAHUATL ACATLAN NAHUATL ATLIACA TIXTLA NAHUATL DEL NORTE DEL ESTADO DE PUEBLA NAHUATL HUEYAPAN TETELA DEL VOLCAN NAHUATL ATLACHOLOAYA XOCHITEPEC NAHUATL CUENTEPEC TEMIXCO NAHUATL XALATZALA TLAPA NAHUATL XALPATLAHUAC NAHUATL SAN BERNARDINO TEOTITLAN DEL CAMINO NAHUATL SAN JOSE MIAHUATLAN NAHUATL RAFAEL DELGADO NAHUATL RAFAEL DELGADO NAHUATL SAN PEDRO TLALCUAPAN SANTA ANA CHIAUTEMPAN NAHUATL STA MA COAPAN NAHUATL AMILCINGO ZACUALPAN NAHUATL SAN JERONINO AMANALCO NAHUATL ACAXOCHITLAN NAHUATL COYOTEPEC NAHUATL CUACUILA HUAUCHINANGO NAHUATL TEPOTZTLAN NAHUATL JALATLACO NAHUATL SANTA ANA TLACOTENCO MAIDU KONKAU MAIDU NORTHWEST NAKUM Pen.MAIDUAN NE MAIDU NISENAN WINTU Pen.WINTUAN YANA Hok.YANA WASHO Wsh.WASHO MOSETEN Mos.MOSETENAN WAPPO WY.WAPPO YUKI WY.YUKIAN CENTRAL SIERRA MIWOK NORTHERN SIERRA MIWOK S SIERRA MIWOK PLAINS MIWOK Pen.MIWOK OLAMENTKE PLAINS MIWOK Pen.MIWOK OLAMENTKE MIWOK BODEGA MIWOK LAKE MUTSUN Pen.COSTANOAN RUMSEN MUNICHI Mun.MUNICHI YOKUTS TINLINNEH Pen.YOKUTS YOKUTS UNKNOWN PECH Chi.PAYA MISKITO CACAOPERA Mis.MISUMALPAN ULWA CHIMILA Chi.CHIMILA BORUCA Chi.TALAMANCA DAMANA IKA Chi.ARUAK KOGUI CHIBCHA Chi.CHIBCHAN PROPER RAMA Chi.RAMA CABECAR CHIRIPO CABECAR Chi.TALAMANCA BRIBRI DORASQUE Chi.DORASKE TERIBE Chi.TALAMANCA GUAYMI GUAYMI NGABERE MOVE Chi.GUAYMI BUGLERE MURIRE CUNA Chi.KUNA KUNA YALA SAN BLAS TUNEBO Chi.CHIBCHAN PROPER VENEZUELAN BARI BARI COLUMBIA Chi.MOTILON COLOMBIAN BARI SAANICH SALISH STRAITS SAMISH SONGISH CLALLAM NOOKSACK Sal.CENTRAL SALISH STOLO COWICHAN MUSQUEAM SQUAMISH SECHELT SLIAMMON LUSHOOTSEED PUGET SALISH Sal.CENTRAL SALISH TWANA QUINAULT QUINAULT CHEHALIS UPPER Sal.TSAMOSAN COWLITZ TILLAMOOK Sal.TILLAMOOK SHUSWAP THOMPSON LILLOOET COLUMBIA WENATCHI OKANAGAN COLVILLE Sal.INTERIOR SALISH COEUR DALENE KALISPEL-PEND DOREILLE MONTANA SALISH SPOKANE BELLA COOLA Sal.BELLA COOLA WOUNAAN NORTHERN EMBERA EMBERA NORTHERN CATIO EMBERA DARIEN Cho.CHOCO EMBERA CHAMI EMBERA TADO EPENA BASURUDO EPENA SAIJA CATAWBA Sio.SIOUAN QUILEUTE Chk.CHIMAKUAN QUILEUTE Chk.CHIMAKUAN YARURO Yrr.YARURO KARITIANA Tup.ARIKEM EYAK NDe.EYAK CHOLON Chl.CHOLON ZUNI Zun.ZUNI SALINAN Sln.SALINAN LULE AND TONOCOTE LV.LULE-VILELA VILELA CHUMASH BARBARENO INESENYO Chu.CHUMASH VENTURENYO MORE ORO WIN CW.CHAPACURA-WANHAN PAKAANOVA OTOMI DE SAN ANDRES CUEXCONTITLAN OTOMI TOLUCA OTOMI DE IXTENCO OTOMI ACAMBAY OTOMI TEMOAYA OTOMI DE EL BAILE OM.OTOMIAN OTOMI MEZQUITAL OTOMI QUERETARO MAZAHUA MAZAHUA CENTRAL MAZAHUA CENTRAL TEMASCALCINGO MAZAHUA TAMASOPO PAME PAME DE JILIAPAN 1767 PAME DE PALUCA 1958 OM.PAMEAN PAME DE JILIAPAN 1958 PAME MERIDIONAL OCUILTECO MATLATZINCA SAN FRANCISCO OXTOTILPAN OM.OTOMIAN MATLATZINCA SAN FRANCISCO OXTOTILPAN 2 CROW HIDATSA MANDAN BILOXI OFO OSAGE QUAPAW Sio.SIOUAN KANSA OMAHA-PONCA WINNEBAGO ASSINIBOINE LAKHOTA DAKOTA LAKOTA MAMAINDE NAMBIKWARA MAMAINDE NAMBIKWARA Nam.NAMBIKUARAN SABANE IRANTXE Arw.ARAWAKAN CHIMARIKO Hok.CHIMARIKO FULNIO MGe.YATE IXCATEC POPOLOCA DE SAN VICENTE COYOTEPEC POPOLOCA METZONTLA POPOLOCA SAN JUAN ATZINGO CHOCHO OCOTLAN CHOCHOTEC SAN LORENZO CUAUNECUILTITLA MAZATEC CHIQUIHUITLAN OM.POPOLOCAN HUAUTLA DE JIMENEZ SAN JERONIMO TECOATL SAN JUAN CHIQUIHUITLAN JALAPA DE DIAZ SAN PEDRO IXCATLAN SAN BARTOLOME AYAUTLA MAZATLAN DE FLORES SAN MIGUEL SOYOLTEPEC HUITOTO MINICA HUITOTO NIPODE HUITOTO MINICA 2 HUITOTO NUPODE HUITOTO MINICA 2 HUITOTO NUPODE HUITOTO MURUI 2 Hui.HUITOTO HUITOTO MIKA HUITOTO MURUI NONUYA OCAINA OCAINA 2 TIMUCUA Tim.TIMUCUA CAYUBABA Cay.CAYUVAVA TARASCAN PUREPECHA Tar.TARASCAN PURHEPECHA PURHEPECHA 2 BORA MIRANA Hui.BORAN MUINANE MUINANE 2 RESIGARO Arw.ARAWAKAN AJYININKA APURUCAYALI ASHENINKA UCAYALI YURUA ASHENINKA PICHIS CAMPA DE PERENE ASHANINKA ASHENINKA MACHIGUENGA MACHIGUENGA NOMATSIGUENGA CAQUINTE AMUESHA 1 AMUESHA 2 GARIFUNA ISLAND CARIB TAINO LOKONO PARAUJANO WAYUU IGNACIANO
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Some Principles of the Use of Macro-Areas Language Dynamics &A
    Online Appendix for Harald Hammarstr¨om& Mark Donohue (2014) Some Principles of the Use of Macro-Areas Language Dynamics & Change Harald Hammarstr¨om& Mark Donohue The following document lists the languages of the world and their as- signment to the macro-areas described in the main body of the paper as well as the WALS macro-area for languages featured in the WALS 2005 edi- tion. 7160 languages are included, which represent all languages for which we had coordinates available1. Every language is given with its ISO-639-3 code (if it has one) for proper identification. The mapping between WALS languages and ISO-codes was done by using the mapping downloadable from the 2011 online WALS edition2 (because a number of errors in the mapping were corrected for the 2011 edition). 38 WALS languages are not given an ISO-code in the 2011 mapping, 36 of these have been assigned their appropri- ate iso-code based on the sources the WALS lists for the respective language. This was not possible for Tasmanian (WALS-code: tsm) because the WALS mixes data from very different Tasmanian languages and for Kualan (WALS- code: kua) because no source is given. 17 WALS-languages were assigned ISO-codes which have subsequently been retired { these have been assigned their appropriate updated ISO-code. In many cases, a WALS-language is mapped to several ISO-codes. As this has no bearing for the assignment to macro-areas, multiple mappings have been retained. 1There are another couple of hundred languages which are attested but for which our database currently lacks coordinates.
    [Show full text]
  • Fieldwork and Linguistic Analysis in Indigenous Languages of the Americas
    Fieldwork and Linguistic Analysis in Indigenous Languages of the Americas edited by Andrea L. Berez, Jean Mulder, and Daisy Rosenblum Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 2 Published as a sPecial Publication of language documentation & conservation language documentation & conservation Department of Linguistics, UHM Moore Hall 569 1890 East-West Road Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822 USA http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc university of hawai‘i Press 2840 Kolowalu Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822-1888 USA © All texts and images are copyright to the respective authors. 2010 All chapters are licensed under Creative Commons Licenses Cover design by Cameron Chrichton Cover photograph of salmon drying racks near Lime Village, Alaska, by Andrea L. Berez Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data ISBN 978-0-8248-3530-9 http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4463 Contents Foreword iii Marianne Mithun Contributors v Acknowledgments viii 1. Introduction: The Boasian tradition and contemporary practice 1 in linguistic fieldwork in the Americas Daisy Rosenblum and Andrea L. Berez 2. Sociopragmatic influences on the development and use of the 9 discourse marker vet in Ixil Maya Jule Gómez de García, Melissa Axelrod, and María Luz García 3. Classifying clitics in Sm’algyax: 33 Approaching theory from the field Jean Mulder and Holly Sellers 4. Noun class and number in Kiowa-Tanoan: Comparative-historical 57 research and respecting speakers’ rights in fieldwork Logan Sutton 5. The story of *o in the Cariban family 91 Spike Gildea, B.J. Hoff, and Sérgio Meira 6. Multiple functions, multiple techniques: 125 The role of methodology in a study of Zapotec determiners Donna Fenton 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Chitimacha-Totozoquean Hypothesis1
    ASSESSING THE CHITIMACHA-TOTOZOQUEAN HYPOTHESIS1 DANIEL W. HIEBER UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 1. Introduction2 Scholars have attempted to genetically classify the Chitimacha language of Louisiana ever since the first vocabulary of the language was collected by Martin Duralde in 1802. Since then, there have been numerous attempts to relate Chitimacha to other isolates of the region (Swanton 1919; Swadesh 1946a; Gursky 1969), Muskogean as part of a broader Proto-Gulf hypothesis (Haas 1951; Haas 1952), and even languages as far afield as Yuki in California (Munro 1994). The most recent attempt at classification, however, looks in a new direction, and links Chitimacha with the recently-advanced Totozoquean language family of Mesoamerica (Brown, Wichmann & Beck 2014; Brown et al. 2011), providing 90 cognate sets and a number of 1 [Acknowledgements] 2 Abbreviations used in this paper are as follows: * reconstructed form ** hypothetical form intr. intransitive post. postposition tr. transitive AZR adjectivizer CAUS causative NZR nominalizer PLACT pluractional TRZR transitivizer VZR verbalizer morphological parallels as evidence. Now, recent internal reconstructions in Chitimacha made available in Hieber (2013), as well as a growing understanding of Chitimacha grammar (e.g. Hieber forthcoming), make it possible to assess the Chitimacha- Totozoquean hypothesis in light of more robust data. This paper shows that a more detailed understanding of Chitimacha grammar and lexicon casts doubt on the possibility of a genetic connection between Chitimacha and Mesoamerica. Systematic sound correspondences prove to be unattainable for the data provided in Brown, Wichmann & Beck (2014). However, groups of correspondences do appear in the data, suggestive of diffusion through contact rather than genetic inheritance.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title A History of Guelaguetza in Zapotec Communities of the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, 16th Century to the Present Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7tv1p1rr Author Flores-Marcial, Xochitl Marina Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles A History of Guelaguetza in Zapotec Communities of the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, 16th Century to the Present A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Xóchitl Marina Flores-Marcial 2015 © Copyright by Xóchitl Marina Flores-Marcial 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION A History of Guelaguetza in Zapotec Communities of the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, 16th Century to the Present by Xóchitl Marina Flores-Marcial Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Kevin B. Terraciano, Chair My project traces the evolution of the Zapotec cultural practice of guelaguetza, an indigenous sharing system of collaboration and exchange in Mexico, from pre-Columbian and colonial times to the present. Ironically, the term "guelaguetza" was appropriated by the Mexican government in the twentieth century to promote an annual dance festival in the city of Oaxaca that has little to do with the actual meaning of the indigenous tradition. My analysis of Zapotec-language alphabetic sources from the Central Valley of Oaxaca, written from the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries, reveals that Zapotecs actively participated in the sharing system during this long period of transformation. My project demonstrates that the Zapotec sharing economy functioned to build and reinforce social networks among households in Zapotec communities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of the Separation Base Method for Genealogical Subgrouping, with Data from Mixe-Zoquean*
    Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 2006, Volume 13, Numbers 2 – 3, pp. 225 – 264 DOI: 10.1080/09296170600850759 A Critique of the Separation Base Method for Genealogical Subgrouping, with Data from Mixe-Zoquean* Michael Cysouw, Søren Wichmann and David Kamholz Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig ABSTRACT Holm (2000) proposes the ‘‘separation base’’ method for determining subgroup relationships in a language family. The method is claimed to be superior to most approaches to lexicostatistics because the latter falls victim to the ‘‘proportionality trap’’, that is, the assumption that similarity is proportional to closeness of relationship. The principles underlying Holm’s method are innovative and not obviously incorrect. However, his only demonstration of the method is with Indo-European. This makes it difficult to interpret the results, because higher-order Indo-European subgrouping remains controversial. In order to have some basis for verification, we have tested the method on Mixe-Zoquean, a well-studied family of Mesoamerica whose subgrouping has been established by two scholars working independently and using the traditional comparative method. The results of our application of Holm’s method are significantly different from the currently accepted family tree of Mixe-Zoquean. We identify two basic sources of problems that arise when Holm’s approach is applied to our data. The first is reliance on an etymological dictionary of the proto-language in question, which creates problems of circularity that cannot be overcome. The second is that the method is sensitive to the amount of documentation available for the daughter languages, which has a distorting effect on the computed relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • A Linguistic Look at the Olmecs Author(S): Lyle Campbell and Terrence Kaufman Source: American Antiquity, Vol
    Society for American Archaeology A Linguistic Look at the Olmecs Author(s): Lyle Campbell and Terrence Kaufman Source: American Antiquity, Vol. 41, No. 1 (Jan., 1976), pp. 80-89 Published by: Society for American Archaeology Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/279044 Accessed: 24/02/2010 18:09 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sam. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Society for American Archaeology is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Antiquity. http://www.jstor.org 80 AMERICAN ANTIQUITY [Vol. 41, No. 1, 1976] Palomino, Aquiles Smith, Augustus Ledyard, and Alfred V.
    [Show full text]
  • LIN 631 Linguistic Description of American Languages
    Course: LIN 631 Linguistic description of American languages: Typological properties of Mesoamerican languages Term: Fall 2007 Text: Readings on reserve Meetings: T/R15:30 -16:50 in 118 Baldy Instructor: Dr. Jürgen Bohnemeyer – Office 627 Baldy Phone 645-2177 ext 727 E-mail [email protected] Office hours T 11:00-11:30 and R 10:00-11:00 Overview: The seminar covers Mesoamerican (MA) and adjacent languages. 1 The MA linguistic and cultural area stretches from the Valley of Mexico in the North to the northern Honduran border on the Caribbean coast and well into Costa Rica on the Pacific Coast. The MA languages comprise five unrelated families: Otomanguean; Aztecan (a branch of the larger Uto-Aztecan language family); Totonacan; Mixe- Zoquean; and Mayan. A number of MA languages are isolates or of uncertain genealogical grouping; these include Purépecha (or Tarascan), Huave, Oaxaca Chontal (or Tequistlatec), and Xinca. The MA languages have long been recognized as forming a sprachbund or linguistic area. Several millennia of intensive contact have changed the members of the various unrelated language families so as to enhance their compatibility in formal and semantic categories. Phenomena that are pervasive in the MA area include head-marking; ergative and split-intransitive traits in both morphology and syntax; alignment-hierarchy (or “obviation”) effects in argument linking; verb-initial and verb-final constituent orders; morpho-syntactic alienable-inalienable distinctions in adnominal possession; (numeral, nominal, and possessive) classificatory systems; and lack of deictic tense coupled with rich systems of aspectual and modal marking. Polysynthesis, in the sense that syntactic relations and processes tend to have morphological reflexes at the word level and in the sense that content words, in combination with the necessary inflections and function words, can constitute clauses by themselves (independently of their lexical category), is widespread in most MA language families, the most important exception being Otomanguean.
    [Show full text]
  • Isthmus (Juchit´An) Zapotec
    ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE IPA Isthmus (Juchitan)´ Zapotec VelmaB.Pickett† SIL International Mar´ıa Villalobos Villalobos SIL International Stephen A. Marlett SIL International [email protected] Isthmus Zapotec (autoglossonym: [dıŸ a"zŸ aÚŸ ]) is the common name used for a variety of Zapotec (Otomanguean family) spoken on the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, Mexico (Suarez⁄ 1983: xvi; Campbell 1997: 158). It is now officially listed by the Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indıgenas⁄ (INALI 2008) as ‘zapoteco de la planicie costera’ (‘coastal plain Zapotec’) to distinguish it from other varieties of Zapotec spoken on the Isthmus. It is the mother tongue of many inhabitants of various cities and towns, as well as many smaller communities (INALI 2008), with some lexical, syntactic and phonetic variation between towns only a few kilometers apart. The ISO 639-3 code for this variety is zai. Since the most recent census figures do not separate out the varieties of Zapotec, and have not done so reliably when attempted, official statistics as to the number of speakers of Isthmus Zapotec are not available. (The Ethnologue (Lewis 2009) cites the 1990 census as listing 85,000 speakers; that figure must have been an interpretation of other statistics in the census.) INALI (personal communication, September 2008) estimates the current number to be about 104,000. In the city of Tehuantepec, the language is no longer widely used. In certain other locations, including Juchitan⁄ de Zaragoza, Spanish is becoming the dominant or the only language spoken by many people born after about 1990, although Zapotec is dominant in many outlying towns, including San Blas Atempa.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Sources
    Data sources Stephen A. Marlett, compiler The Zapotec Grammar Files Stephen A. Marlett, compiler (March 2011) Data sources [http://mexico.sil.org/resources/archives/60560]. In: Cheryl A. Black, H. Andrew Black and Stephen A. Marlett (eds.) The Zapotec Grammar Files. © SIL International. These are working papers that are periodically updated, expanded, and corrected. Comments or corrections can be sent to the editors (see the index page). 2 Data sources Contents Data sources . 2 References . 6 Data sources This document provides information about the sources of data for The Zapotec Grammar Files. Full bibliographic references are found in the References section. Some works referenced in the bibliography are listed under ??? "Unspecified" in this table because it is not clear yet where they should go. Some sources are listed as unpublished field notes (f.n.). The names listed by INALI (Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas, INALI (2008)) may not correspond one-for-one with those listed in the Ethnologue (Gordon (2005)), of course. For that reason, not all of the names used by INALI are listed here. There may also be some inexactitude with the correspondences given here. The ISO 639-3 code for Zapotec as a macrolanguage is [zap]. Data sources 3 ISO 639-3 Identifier as in the INALI name (INALI Sources Code Ethnologue 2008) (each preceded by (Gordon 2005) "zapoteco") (each followed by "Zapotec") zaa Sierra de Juárez serrano, del oeste Bartholomew (1983), Fernández de Miranda (1995), Gibbs (1977), Marlett (1993), Nellis (1947), Nellis & Nellis
    [Show full text]
  • Work Papers of the Summer Intitute of Linguistics, 1993. University of North Dakota Session, Volume 37
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 365 098 FL 021 593 AUTHOR Dooley, Robert A., Ed.; Meyer, Jim, Ed. TITLE Work Papers of the Summer Intitute of Linguistics, 1993. University of North Dakota Session, Volume 37. INSTITUTION Summer Inst. of Linguistics, Grand Forks, N. Dak. PUB DATE 93 NOTE 186p.; For individual papers, see FL 021 594-599. AVAILABLE FROM SIL-UND Work Papers, c/o International Linguistic Center, Bookroom, 7500 West Camp Wisdom Road, Dallas, TX 75236. PUB TYPE Collecteet Works Conference Proceedings (021) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Grammar; *Kinship Terminology; Linguistic Theory; *Phonology; *Quechua; *Spanish; Structural Analysis (Linguistics); Suffixes; Syntax; Uncommonly Taught Languages IDENTIFIERS Clitics; *Seri; *Zapotec ABSTRACT This volume of work papers from the Summer Institute of Linguistics includes the following: "Goals and Indirect Objects in Seri" (Stephen A. Marlett); "Seri Kinship Terminology" (Mary B. Moser and Stephen A. Marlett); "Quiegolani Zapotec Phonology" (Sue Regnier); "Role and Reference Grammar" (Robert D. Van Valin, Jr.); "The Binding Proper'ies of Quechua Suffixes" (David Weber); and "Obligatory Dative ,litic Doubling in Spanish" (Karol J. Franklin). (JL) *********************************************************************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * * from the original document. * *********************************************************************** WORK PAPERS VOLUME XXXVII 1993 "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCETHIS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION MATERIAL HAS BEEN Office o4 Educabonal Research and Improvement GRANTED BY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION Th,0\e_ CENTER (ERIC) Frftris document has been reproduced as recemed from the person or organization orrginatrng re 0 Minor changes have been made to rrnprom reproduction oualdy TO THE EDUCATIONAL Pornts of vrew or opmrons staled in this docu- RESOURCES ment do not necessarily represent official INFORMATION CENTER(ERIC)..
    [Show full text]
  • Space in Languages in Mexico and Central America Carolyn O'meara
    Space in languages in Mexico and Central America Carolyn O’Meara, Gabriela Pérez Báez, Alyson Eggleston, Jürgen Bohnemeyer 1. Introduction This chapter presents an overview of the properties of spatial representations in languages of the region. The analyses presented here are based on data from 47 languages belonging to ten Deleted: on literature covering language families in addition to literature on language isolates. Overall, these languages are located primarily in Mexico, covering the Mesoamerican Sprachbundi, but also extending north to include languages such as the isolate Seri and several Uto-Aztecan languages, and south to include Sumu-Mayangna, a Misumalpan language of Nicaragua. Table 1 provides a list of the Deleted: The literature consulted includes a mix of languages analyzed for this chapter. descriptive grammars as well as studies dedicated to spatial language and cognition and, when possible and relevant, primary data collected by the authors. Table 1 provides a Table 1. Languages examined in this chapter1 Family / Stock Relevant sub-branches Language Mayan Yucatecan Yucatecan- Yucatec Lacandon Mopan-Itzá Mopan Greater Cholan Yokot’an (Chontal de Tabasco) Tseltalan Tseltalan Tseltal Zinacantán Tsotsil Q’anjob’alan- Q’anjob’alan Q’anjob’al Chujean Jacaltec Otomanguean Otopame- Otomí Eastern Highland Otomí Chinantecan Ixtenco Otomí San Ildefonso Tultepec Otomí Tilapa Otomí Chinantec Palantla Chinantec 1 In most cases, we have reproduced the language name as used in the studies that we cite. However, we diverge from this practice in a few cases. One such case would be one in which we know firsthand what the preferred language name is among members of the language community.
    [Show full text]
  • Language EI Country Genetic Unit Speakers RI Acatepec Tlapanec 5
    Language EI Country Genetic Unit Speakers RI Acatepec Tlapanec 5 Mexico Subtiapa-Tlapanec 33000 1 Alacatlatzala Mixtec 4.5 Mexico Mixtecan 23000 2 Alcozauca Mixtec 5 Mexico Mixtecan 10000 3 Aloápam Zapotec 4 Mexico Zapotecan 2100 4 Amatlán Zapotec 5 Mexico Zapotecan 6000 5 Amoltepec Mixtec 3 Mexico Mixtecan 6000 6 Ascunción Mixtepec Zapotec 1 Mexico Zapotecan 100 7 Atatláhuca Mixtec 5 Mexico Mixtecan 8300 8 Ayautla Mazatec 5 Mexico Popolocan 3500 9 Ayoquesco Zapotec 3 Mexico Zapotecan < 900 10 Ayutla Mixtec 5 Mexico Mixtecan 8500 11 Azoyú Tlapanec 1 Mexico Subtiapa-Tlapanec < 680 12 Aztingo Matlatzinca 1 Mexico Otopamean > < 100 13 Matlatzincan Cacaloxtepec Mixtec 2.5 Mexico Mixtecan < 850 14 Cajonos Zapotec 4 Mexico Zapotecan 5000 15 Central Hausteca Nahuatl 5 Mexico Uto-Aztecan 200000 16 Central Nahuatl 3 Mexico Uto-Aztecan 40000 17 Central Pame 4 Mexico Pamean 4350 18 Central Puebla Nahuatl 4.5 Mexico Uto-Aztecan 16000 19 Chaopan Zapotec 5 Mexico Zapotecan 24000 20 Chayuco Mixtec 5 Mexico Mixtecan 30000 21 Chazumba Mixtec 2 Mexico Mixtecan < 2,500 22 Chiapanec 1 Mexico Chiapanec-Mangue < 20 23 Chicahuaxtla Triqui 5 Mexico Mixtecan 6000 24 Chichicapan Zapotec 4 Mexico Zapotecan 4000 25 Chichimeca-Jonaz 3 Mexico Otopamean > < 200 26 Chichimec Chigmecatitlan Mixtec 3 Mexico Mixtecan 1600 27 Chiltepec Chinantec 3 Mexico Chinantecan < 1,000 28 Chimalapa Zoque 3.5 Mexico Zoque 4500 29 Chiquihuitlán Mazatec 3.5 Mexico Popolocan 2500 30 Chochotec 3 Mexico Popolocan 770 31 Coatecas Altas Zapotec 4 Mexico Zapotecan 5000 32 Coatepec Nahuatl 2.5
    [Show full text]