DOCSLIB.ORG

Pop-Culture Psychopathy: How Media and Literature Exposure Relate To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pop-Culture Psychopathy: How Media and Literature Exposure Relate To Pop-Culture Psychopathy: How Media and Literature Exposure Relate to Lay Psychopathy Understanding Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences Drexel University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Michael E. Keesler, M.S., J.D. Department of Psychology May, 2013 Pop-Culture Psychopathy ii Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ ii Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... v Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Background and Literature Summary ............................................................................................. 2 Psychopathy’s Evolution Over Time ........................................................................................ 2 Contemporary Psychopathy ................................................................................................ 4 The Public’s Evolving Relationship with Psychology.............................................................. 8 Increase in Psychopathy Professional Literature for Lay Consumer ...................................... 10 Increase in Psychopathy Popular Media Delivered to Lay Consumer ................................... 13 What Effect Do Mixed Messages About Psychopathy Have on the Consumer? ................... 16 Rationale for the Present Study............................................................................................... 17 Hypotheses ........................................................................................................................ 18 Method .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Participants .............................................................................................................................. 18 Materials ................................................................................................................................. 20 Demographic Information and General Knowledge Questionnaire ................................. 20 Television and Movie-Watching Questionnaire ............................................................... 20 Professional Literature Questionnaire............................................................................... 22 Psychopath Identification Questionnaire .......................................................................... 22 Psychopathy Traits Questionnaire .................................................................................... 23 Procedure ................................................................................................................................ 24 Results ........................................................................................................................................... 25 Demographic Statistics ........................................................................................................... 25 Pop-Culture Psychopathy iii Descriptive Statistics ............................................................................................................... 26 Correlational Analyses ............................................................................................................ 29 Exposure to Popular Media Psychopathy and Psychopathy Understanding .................... 29 Exposure to Professional Psychopathy Literature and Psychopathy Understanding........ 31 Exposure to Psychopathy and Self-Reported Expertise .................................................... 32 Exposure to Protagonist Psychopaths and Romanticized Psychopathy ............................ 33 Exposure to Antagonist Psychopaths and Demonized Psychopathy ................................ 34 Ad-Hoc Correlational Analyses ........................................................................................ 35 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 38 Summary of Findings .............................................................................................................. 38 Implications............................................................................................................................. 40 Limitations and Directions for Future Research ..................................................................... 44 References ..................................................................................................................................... 46 Appendix A ................................................................................................................................... 56 Appendix B ................................................................................................................................... 57 Appendix C ................................................................................................................................... 58 Appendix D ................................................................................................................................... 59 Appendix E ................................................................................................................................... 60 Appendix F.................................................................................................................................... 62 Appendix G ................................................................................................................................... 64 Appendix H ................................................................................................................................... 65 Appendix I .................................................................................................................................... 66 Appendix J .................................................................................................................................... 67 Appendix K ................................................................................................................................... 68 Pop-Culture Psychopathy iv Appendix L ................................................................................................................................... 71 Appendix M .................................................................................................................................. 74 Appendix N ................................................................................................................................... 75 Appendix O ................................................................................................................................... 77 Appendix P.................................................................................................................................... 78 Appendix Q ................................................................................................................................... 79 Table Q1.................................................................................................................................. 79 Table Q2.................................................................................................................................. 81 Table Q3.................................................................................................................................. 82 Table Q4.................................................................................................................................. 83 Table Q5.................................................................................................................................. 84 Figure Q1 ................................................................................................................................ 85 Figure Q2 ................................................................................................................................ 86 Figure Q3 ................................................................................................................................ 87 Figure Q4 ................................................................................................................................ 88 Figure Q5 ................................................................................................................................ 89 Figure Q6 ................................................................................................................................ 89 Pop-Culture Psychopathy v Abstract Psychologists’ conceptualization of psychopathy has gradually evolved over time, with interest peaking in recent decades. Concurrently, the lay public’s relationship with psychology has changed from guarded skepticism to acceptance and even demand. The tie that binds psychology and the public has always been mass communication, both in news and popular media format. Reflecting changing trends, mass media has altered the way it objectively describes and popularly portrays psychopathy. Whereas psychopaths were consistently portrayed as villains in the mid-20th Century, today
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sandra Oh Sandra Oh Is a Major Reason Why
    30 INTERVIEW EDGE n Thursday nights in America, life simply stops for somewhere between 10 inte rview Oand 20 million television viewers as they settle in for the newest episode of Grey’s Anatomy . Sandra Oh Sandra Oh is a major reason why. As Dr. Cristina Yang, she plays opposite the series’ title character, Dr. Meredith Grey, who is portrayed by Ellen Pompeo. They lead an ensemble cast that has become a second family to fans since the show first aired seven seasons ago. As J.M. Stewart discovered in this interview, Oh’s knack for creating signature characters (think Arli$$ and Sideways ) comes from an astonishingly honest place. Sandra’s greatest talent, however, may be the ability to keep her head and value her craft in a world where performers are measured by SAG Awards and Emmy Nominations. Of which she has plenty, by the way. EDGE: How was it conveyed to you that Grey’s Anatomy was a different kind of medical drama? s e g a m I It was never said or expressed SO: y t t e formally. The writers and [series G / p u creator] Shonda Rhimes found a way o r G n of telling this story that just worked. It o i s i v is basically a classic storyline. There e l e T are five acts, each person has a C B A y medical issue, and a lot of the time e n s i these medical issues reflect what is D / o c i going on with the characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Incurable Psychopaths?
    Incurable Psychopaths? Marianne Kristiansson, MD Treatment, comprising pharmacotherapy and an educational program based on cognitive behavior therapy, of four psychopathic, criminal men fulfilling the crite- ria for borderline personality disorder and antisocial personality disorder is de- scribed. The diagnoses were made during a forensic psychiatric evaluation. An estimation of the capacity of the central serotonergic system was performed by analysing the platelet monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity. The pharmacotherapy was combined with an educational program involving strategies for developing better impulse control. All four men had earlier been regarded as resistant to conventional therapy. In the present cases, a combined psychosocial and biolog- ical approach seemed to be effective in developing an increased control of im- pulses, leading to improved coping strategies. Controlled studies are needed in order to clarify whether the described treatment program proves beneficial. Psychopathy, as originally described by personality disorder according to DSM- Cleckley,' comprises a set of clinical 111-R.~ characteristics including superficial The possibility of curing or even trying charm, unreliability, untruthfulness, lack to treat criminal psychopathic individuals of remorse or shame, failure to learn by is often looked upon as futile. Most treat- experience, incapacity for love, general ment programs involve various psycho- poverty in major affective relations, and social interventions and little effort has failure to follow any life
    [Show full text]
  • Perceived Social Rank, Social Expectation, Shame and General Emotionality Within Psychopathy
    Perceived social rank, social expectation, shame and general emotionality within psychopathy Sarah Keen D. Clin.Psy. Thesis (Volume 1), 2008 University College London UMI Number: U591545 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U591545 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Overview Within the psychological literature, the self-conscious emotion of shame is proving to be an area of growing interest. This thesis addresses the application of this emotion, as well as self and social evaluative processes, to our understanding of offenders, specifically those high in psychopathic traits. Part 1 reviews the literature concerning emotionality within psychopathy, in order to assess the capabilities, as well as the deficits that people with psychopathic traits demonstrate. Emotions classified as ‘moral’ or ‘self-conscious’, namely empathy, sympathy, guilt, remorse, shame, embarrassment and pride, are investigated. From the review it is clear that psychopaths are not the truly unemotional individuals that they are commonly portrayed as being, but instead experience many emotions to varying degrees. This paper concludes by highlighting possible areas for further exploration and research.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Reviews
    Page 117 FILM REVIEWS Year of the Remake: The Omen 666 and The Wicker Man Jenny McDonnell The current trend for remakes of 1970s horror movies continued throughout 2006, with the release on 6 June of John Moore’s The Omen 666 (a scene­for­scene reconstruction of Richard Donner’s 1976 The Omen) and the release on 1 September of Neil LaBute’s The Wicker Man (a re­imagining of Robin Hardy’s 1973 film of the same name). In addition, audiences were treated to remakes of The Hills Have Eyes, Black Christmas (due Christmas 2006) and When a Stranger Calls (a film that had previously been ‘remade’ as the opening sequence of Scream). Finally, there was Pulse, a remake of the Japanese film Kairo, and another addition to the body of remakes of non­English language horror films such as The Ring, The Grudge and Dark Water. Unsurprisingly, this slew of remakes has raised eyebrows and questions alike about Hollywood’s apparent inability to produce innovative material. As the remakes have mounted in recent years, from Planet of the Apes to King Kong, the cries have grown ever louder: Hollywood, it would appear, has run out of fresh ideas and has contributed to its ever­growing bank balance by quarrying the classics. Amid these accusations of Hollywood’s imaginative and moral bankruptcy to commercial ends in tampering with the films on which generations of cinephiles have been reared, it can prove difficult to keep a level head when viewing films like The Omen 666 and The Wicker Man.
    [Show full text]
  • I PSYCHOPATHY and the INSANITY DEFENSE
    i PSYCHOPATHY AND THE INSANITY DEFENSE: A GROUNDED THEORY EXPLORATION OF PUBLIC PERCEPTION BY ELISABETH KNOPP A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Forensic Psychology California Baptist University School of Behavioral Sciences 2017 ii © 2017 Knopp, Elisabeth All Rights Reserved iii Dedication This thesis is dedicated to Mitchell, the love of my life. Thank you for all the love and support throughout this writing process, all the pep talks, and helping me fight procrastination! You are my best friend, my favorite study buddy, and my best accountability partner! Without your positive attitude and encouragement, I may not have gotten through my numerous late night writing sessions. I would also like to dedicate this to my parents who have been there for me all the life and have always pushed me to do my best. I can’t imagine my life without your support and encouragement. You gave me so many opportunities to succeed and wouldn’t ever let me settle for less than my best. You have helped shape me into the person I am today. I wouldn’t be here without you! iv Acknowledgements I would like to thank my wonderful thesis chair, Dr. Anne-Marie Larsen, for her immense help while writing this thesis. Without your guidance, our brainstorming sessions, and all your assistance, I likely wouldn’t even have a completed thesis. Thank you for pushing me to take opportunities to present at conferences and colloquiums and better my resume through research. You have been an immense support to me during these two years and I have always valued your advice and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Psychopath Whisperer
    The Psychopath Whisperer Kent Kiehl is Executive Science Offi cer of the nonprofi t Mind Re- Inside the Minds of Those Without a search Network and Professor of Psychology, Neurosciences, and Law at the University of New Mexico. In addition to authoring more than Conscience 130 articles in peer-reviewed publications, including Nature and Sci- ence, Kiehl has writ ten for Scientifi c American, has appeared on US National Public Rardio, and was profi led by John Seabrook in The New Yorker. He currently directs fi ve major projects in psychopathy and related mental health funded by the UN National Institutes of Health. He lectures extensively to judges, lawyers, prison offi cials, and lay audiences about the inter section of neuroscience and the law. Kent Kiehl Psychopath Whisperer short royal.indd 3 11/03/2014 12:40 A Oneworld Book First published in Great Britain and Australia by Oneworld Publications 2014 Published in the United States by Crown Publishers, an imprint of the Crown Publishing Group, a division of Random House LLC, a Penguin Random House Company Copyright © Kent Kiehl 2014 For Mom and Dad The moral right of Kent Kiehl to be identifi ed as the Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 All rights reserved Copyright under Berne Convention A CIP record for this title is available from the British Library ISBN 978-1-78074-539-8 eBook ISBN 978-1-78074-540-4 Book design by Lauren Dong Illustrations by Fred Haynes Cover design by shepherdstudio.co.uk Printed and bound by
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Psychopathy Relate to Humor and Laughter? Dispositions Toward Ridicule and Being Laughed At, the Sense of Humor, and Psychopathic Personality Traits
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2012 How does psychopathy relate to humor and laughter? Dispositions toward ridicule and being laughed at, the sense of humor, and psychopathic personality traits Proyer, Rene T ; Flisch, Rahel ; Tschupp, Stefanie ; Platt, Tracey ; Ruch, Willibald Abstract: This scoping study examines the relation of the sense of humor and three dispositions toward ridicule and being laughed at to psychopathic personality traits. Based on self-reports from 233 adults, psychopathic personality traits were robustly related to enjoying laughing at others, which most strongly related to a manipulative/impulsive lifestyle and callousness. Higher psychopathic traits correlated with bad mood and it existed independently from the ability of laughing at oneself. While overall psychopathic personality traits existed independently from the sense of humor, the facet of superficial charm yielded a robust positive relation. Higher joy in being laughed at also correlated with higher expressions in superficial charm and grandiosity while fearing to be laughed at went along with higher expressions in a manipulative life-style. Thus, the psychopathic personality trait could be well described in its relation to humor and laughter. Implications of the findings are highlighted and discussed with respect to the current literature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.04.007 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-62966 Journal Article Accepted Version Originally published at: Proyer, Rene T; Flisch, Rahel; Tschupp, Stefanie; Platt, Tracey; Ruch, Willibald (2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosing Drama: Grey's Anatomy, Blind Casting, and the Politics Of
    Diagnosing Drama: Grey’s Anatomy, Blind Casting, and the Politics of Representation AMY LONG N FEBRUARY 5, 2006 NEARLY THIRTY-EIGHT MILLION VIEWERS CHOSE TO forego post-Super Bowl celebrations in favor of tuning in to a Omuch-hyped episode of ABC’s hit medical melodrama Grey’s Anatomy. The episode thus constitutes ‘‘the best scripted-series perfor- mance since the series finale of Friends’’ in 2004 and ‘‘the best per- formance of an ABC show since an episode of Home Improvement in 1994’’ (‘‘Grey’s Scores Big’’). Grey’s Anatomy and its multiracial ensem- ble stand in marked contrast to the all-white casts of both aforemen- tioned shows, a fact that has not been lost on media observers. When civil rights groups issued their annual ‘‘diversity report cards’’ for 2006, ABC garnered the highest overall grade of the four major net- works (an A-), thanks in part to shows like Grey’s Anatomy, Lost, and Ugly Betty (‘‘Grey’s Leads Charge’’). Its diverse cast and the production practices through which it was assembled have been the major focus of the media attention conferred upon Grey’s, second only to stories con- cerning the colossal audiences it routinely snags.1 The show’s creator, Shonda Rhimes (currently the only African American woman ‘‘showrunner’’ in network television), gives the credit for her show’s diversity to her ‘‘race-blind’’ casting methods. In her Time Magazine profile of the writer and producer, Jeanne McDowell notes that ‘‘[Rhimes’] script for the pilot had no physical descriptions [of its characters] other than gender,’’ a statement repeated in almost all of the popular press coverage the show receives.2 As Rhimes herself affirmed in an interview with Oprah Winfrey, ‘‘We really read every color actor for every single part.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RIGHTS and WRONGS of the PSYCHOPATH in CRIMINAL LAW: HOW MODERN SCIENCE MUST RESHAPE OLD POLICY. © Jasmine Nicolson* INTROD
    THE RIGHTS AND WRONGS OF THE PSYCHOPATH IN CRIMINAL LAW: HOW MODERN SCIENCE MUST RESHAPE OLD POLICY. © Jasmine Nicolson* INTRODUCTION Psychopaths have long been enshrined in both popular culture and in law as the face of evil and danger;1 their classic characteristics of callousness, impulsivity, and remorselessness have helped to cement the conceptual link between psychopathy and violent crime.2 Psychiatrists from the 19th century, with all the equipment they had available at the time, made sweeping generalisations about the nature of the disorder. Pinel described patients who appeared without delusions or psychosis, as mentally unimpaired but engaged in impulsive acts of ‘instincte fureur’.3 Prichard built upon this definition to develop the concept of ‘moral insanity’. This term has evolved since its original intent – coming from the original French, ‘moral’ was taken to mean ‘emotional’ rather than ethical – and so the original ‘moral insanity’ was a ‘madness’ of emotional disposition and social ability, but without hallucinations or delusions.4 The concept has since evolved to include a lack of comprehension and appreciation of ethics and morality,5 but ultimately the M’Naghten rules in 1842 forged the legal defence of insanity, which required a clear presence of delusion, rather than a mere lack of morality.6 Both jurisdictions of England and Scotland have since built upon this to include an inability to 1 Cary Federman, Dave Holmes, and Jean Daniel Jacob, "Deconstructing the Psychopath: A Critical Discursive Analysis," Cultural Critique 72, no. 1 (2009). 2 Eric Silver, Edward P. Mulvey, and John Monahan, "Assessing Violence Risk among Discharged Psychiatric Patients: Toward an Ecological Approach," Law and Human Behavior 23, no.
    [Show full text]
  • The Narrative Functions of Television Dreams by Cynthia A. Burkhead A
    Dancing Dwarfs and Talking Fish: The Narrative Functions of Television Dreams By Cynthia A. Burkhead A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Ph.D. Department of English Middle Tennessee State University December, 2010 UMI Number: 3459290 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UMI 3459290 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 DANCING DWARFS AND TALKING FISH: THE NARRATIVE FUNCTIONS OF TELEVISION DREAMS CYNTHIA BURKHEAD Approved: jr^QL^^lAo Qjrg/XA ^ Dr. David Lavery, Committee Chair c^&^^Ce~y Dr. Linda Badley, Reader A>& l-Lr 7i Dr./ Jill Hague, Rea J <7VM Dr. Tom Strawman, Chair, English Department Dr. Michael D. Allen, Dean, College of Graduate Studies DEDICATION First and foremost, I dedicate this work to my husband, John Burkhead, who lovingly carved for me the space and time that made this dissertation possible and then protected that space and time as fiercely as if it were his own. I dedicate this project also to my children, Joshua Scanlan, Daniel Scanlan, Stephen Burkhead, and Juliette Van Hoff, my son-in-law and daughter-in-law, and my grandchildren, Johnathan Burkhead and Olivia Van Hoff, who have all been so impressively patient during this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullies to Buddies P. 1 a Pilot Study of the Bullies To
    Bullies to Buddies p. 1 A Pilot Study of the Bullies to Buddies Training Program Running Head: Bullies to Buddies Bullies to Buddies p. 2 A Pilot Study of the Bullies to Buddies Training Program In a national study of bullying, Nansel, Overpeck, Pilla, Ruan, Simons-Morton, & Scheidt (2001) found that 29.9% of sixth through tenth grade students in the United States report moderate to frequent involvement in bullying: 13% as bullies, 10.6% as victims, and 6.3% as both bullies and victims. Even if they are not chronically involved with bullying, research indicates that the majority of students will experience some form of victimization at least once during their school careers (Felix & McMahon, 2007). Research has shown that students involved in bullying are at increased risk for negative outcomes throughout childhood and adulthood. Children who are the targets of bullying are more likely to experience loneliness and school avoidance than non-bullied students (Kochenderfer & Ladd, 1996; Nansel et al., 2001), have poor academic outcomes, and are at increased risk for mental health problems such as anxiety and suicidal ideation, which can persist into adulthood (Kaltiala-Heino, Rimpela, Rantanen, & Rimpela, 2000; Kochenderfer & Ladd, 1996; Kumpulainen et al., 1998; Olweus, 1995; Rigby, 2000; Schwartz, Gorman, Nakamoto, & Tobin, 2005). Bullies also experience more negative outcomes than their peers; they are more likely to exhibit externalizing behaviors, conduct problems, and delinquency (Haynie et al., 2001; Nansel et al., 2001), are more likely to sexually harass peers, be physically aggressive with their dating partners, and be convicted of crimes in adulthood (Olweus, 1993; Pepler et al., 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Desperate Housewives a Lot Goes on in the Strange Neighborhood of Wisteria Lane
    Desperate Housewives A lot goes on in the strange neighborhood of Wisteria Lane. Sneak into the lives of five women: Susan, a single mother; Lynette, a woman desperately trying to b alance family and career; Gabrielle, an exmodel who has everything but a good m arriage; Bree, a perfect housewife with an imperfect relationship and Edie Britt , a real estate agent with a rocking love life. These are the famous five of Des perate Housewives, a primetime TV show. Get an insight into these popular charac ters with these Desperate Housewives quotes. Susan Yeah, well, my heart wants to hurt you, but I'm able to control myself! How would you feel if I used your child support payments for plastic surgery? Every time we went out for pizza you could have said, "Hey, I once killed a man. " Okay, yes I am closer to your father than I have been in the past, the bitter ha tred has now settled to a respectful disgust. Lynette Please hear me out this is important. Today I have a chance to join the human rac e for a few hours there are actual adults waiting for me with margaritas. Loo k, I'm in a dress, I have makeup on. We didn't exactly forget. It's just usually when the hostess dies, the party is off. And I love you because you find ways to compliment me when you could just say, " I told you so." Gabrielle I want a sexy little convertible! And I want to buy one, right now! Why are all rich men such jerks? The way I see it is that good friends support each other after something bad has happened, great friends act as if nothing has happened.
    [Show full text]