DOCSLIB.ORG

Ameritech Publishing, Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

275-284_58420.CH.07.CASE_II-2 8/14/01 1:39 AM Page 275 CASE STUDY II-2 Ameritech Publishing, Inc. Ameritech Publishing, Inc., a subsidiary of Ameritech Corp- play ad is about $11,000 in a city the size of Bloomington, oration, publishes Ameritech PagesPlus telephone directories Indiana, but can range up to almost $30,000 in Detroit or for the Ameritech Bell telephone companies in Indiana, Cleveland. Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Ameritech Publishing also has Ameritech Publishing is in a very competitive business, with subsidiaries that produce 14 Ameritech Industrial Yellow other companies publishing similar directories in every one of Pages books covering 33 states and publish about 70 its markets. Moreover, Ameritech Publishing must compete directories in 10 states outside the Ameritech area, English with newspapers, radio, television, cable TV, and direct mail for language directories for Tokyo and Osaka, and German, a portion of each customer’s advertising budget. It has a sales Austrian, and Swiss industrial directories. Publishing and force of about 700 people who are paid on a commission distributing approximately 40 million copies of 484 different basis. directories in 1990, Ameritech Publishing had $866.4 million in revenues and provided about one-fourth of Ameritech’s History of Ameritech Publishing profits in 1990. Ameritech Publishing’s primary business is publishing yel- Ameritech Corporation was formed in 1984 as one of seven low pages telephone directories. Yellow pages advertising does regional holding companies created from the divestiture of not generate demand, but a person who has decided to buy AT&T. Prior to divestiture, each of the Bell companies was something often looks in the yellow pages to decide where to responsible for its own telephone directories and yellow pages, buy it. Because almost everyone has access to the yellow but Ameritech quickly decided that there was great potential for pages, and the average person uses them about 100 times growth in yellow pages revenues and that this potential could each year to decide where to obtain something he or she best be exploited by separating the directory operations from already wants, it can be a very productive form of advertising. the local telephone company’s responsibilities and centralizing As shown in Exhibit 1, there are two different types of yel- them in a wholly owned subsidiary. Therefore, in 1984 low pages advertising. The entries in the column in the upper Ameritech Publishing was formed by combining the directory left of Exhibit 1 are in-column ads, which vary in size and form, publishing organizations from Indiana Bell, Michigan Bell, Ohio as described in Exhibit 2. The large ads in Exhibit 1 are display Bell, and Wisconsin Bell. Illinois Bell (which is part of ads, and (although it is not apparent in this black-and-white Ameritech) was excluded because Ameritech decided to han- reproduction) they may be black on yellow or contain several dle directory operations in Illinois through a joint venture with colors. For example, the elaborate border of the “Fields of R. H. Donnelley. Although the telephone directory part of the Flowers” ad is green, and the name Fields of Flowers and the Ameritech business was centralized, the five state telephone telephone number are bright red. Display ads are more com- companies continued to operate as stand-alone entities. pletely described in Exhibit 3. The yearly cost of a full-page dis- Leo Egan, a general manager from Michigan Bell, was the first president of Ameritech Publishing. His mission was to build This case was prepared by Professor E. W. Martin as the basis for an organization while at the same time improving the prof- class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective itability of the ongoing directory operations. To mold an organi- handling of an administrative situation. Its development was sup- zation out of the pieces of four previous groups, Egan orga- ported by the Institute for Research on the Management of nized the company functionally, with most of the field Information Systems (IRMIS), Kelley School of Business, Indiana University. Copyright © 1992 by E. W. Martin. No part of this publica- personnel reporting to publishing and sales vice presidents. He tion may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in also established staff positions in the finance, information ser- any form or by any means without the permission of the author. vices, human resources, and legal areas. 275 275-284_58420.CH.07.CASE_II-2 8/14/01 1:39 AM Page 276 276 Part II Applying Information Technology EXHIBIT 1 Ameritech Yellow Pages In-Column and Display Ads Florists-Retail (Cont'd) FLOWER BOWL THE We Honor Major Credit Cards 756 S. Walnut 332-9343 (See Ad This Clasification) FLOWER STUDIO THE 619 E Audubon Dr 333-7394 FLOWERS BY JANA RENEE Redbud Terrace 988-8900 FLOWERS & INTERIORS INC of FLOWERS Crosstown Shopping Center 333-6433 (See Ad This Clasification) Fields HAMMOND'S FLORIST 173 N Fletcher Av 829-3537 FLOWERS FOR ALL OCCASIONS JUDY'S FLOWERS & GIFTS All Major Credit Cards • WEDDINGS • BIRTHDAYS • ANNIVERSARIES 4015 W 3rd 339-7673 (See Ad This Clasification) • FUNERAL • BALLOONS • FRESH, DRIED, SILK MARY M'S FLOWERS & PLANTS CITY WIDE DELIVERY 406 W 2 336-3222 (See Ad This Clasification) REDBOOK MELICK FLORIST Florist Services COMPLETE FLORAL SERV WORLDWIDE WIRE SERVICES • FRESH FLOWERS FOR ALL OCCASIONS HOURS • • • • BALLOONS • • • • 8:30AM TO 6:00PM • SILK AND DRIED ARRANGEMENTS • GREEN & POTTED PLANTS • WEDDINGS • FRUIT BASKETS FTD Mon - Fri 8:30 AM-5PM 331-0161 Sat - 8:30 AM-Noon 421 E 3RD SUITE 6 IN COLSTONE SQUARE 201 W Morgan 829-6503 MICHAEL'S FLOWERS Jefferson Nashvl 988-7758 Continued Next Page Yellow Pages ads get action YOUR FULL THE DOWNTOWN FLORIST SERVICE ALL OCCASION FLORIST Buds & Branches The “FLOWERS FOR ALL OCCASIONS” Little STUDENT DISCOUNTS Shop With • CUSTOM MADE FLORAL DESIGNS The Big • WIDE VARIETY OF FRESH FLOWERS • DRIED & SILK ARRANGEMENTS CEMETARY • OFFICE • ANNIVERSARY • PLANTS & PLANTERS PERSONAL • WEDDINGS • HOLIDAYS PARTIES • CHURCH MYLAR N & Free Delivery HSKS SILK & FRESH FLOWERS LATEX To Area HSKSJ/Hoks8idj PLANTS MYLAR BALLOONS Funeral Homes HSKSJ/Hoks8idj • Fourth BALLOONS & Hospitals (Walkers • Latest Fads • Characters) Fourth Worldwide Wire Service HSKSJ/H P FREE CITY DELIVERY TO THE HOSPITAL, FUNERAL HOMES, MasterCard 112 FOUNTAIN SQ & NURSING HOMES MON-FRI 9AM-5:30PM ALL MAJOR CREDIT CARDS BLOOMINGTON IN 47401 SAT 9AM-2PM ACCEPTED 332-BUDS 332-2837 1-800-326-1132 The four Bell companies from which the Ameritech ries. He felt that this required standard computer systems to sup- Publishing personnel were drawn had been typical telephone port the publication and sales functions. Egan agreed on the companies with typical telephone company attitudes, but each need for these systems and supported their development, but had its own distinct corporate culture. Each of the Bell compa- his main focus was on the profitability of current operations, not nies did things its own way, which carried over to the yellow on standardizing them. Having accomplished his mission of cre- pages as well. The layouts of the pages, the pricing, the con- ating a new company from fragments of four Ameritech tele- tracts with advertisers, and the sales compensation plans were phone companies and getting it off to a profitable start, Egan all different from one Bell company to another. retired in 1986. He was replaced by Barry Allen, a young, ener- The new publishing vice president, Donald J. Frayer, was con- getic executive from Ameritech with marketing experience and vinced of the need to standardize the publication of the directo- an MBA from the Darden School at the University of Virginia. 275-284_58420.CH.07.CASE_II-2 8/14/01 1:39 AM Page 277 Case Study II-2 Ameritech Publishing, Inc. 277 EXHIBIT 2 Ameritech Yellow Pages In-Column Ad Descriptions LISTINGS: TRADE MARKS: The most basic form of for Brand Name Identification Yellow Pages Identification Headings in Yellow pages Headings Appear in 10 Pt Trade Mark Headings "tie-in" describe the product, service Bold Type with National Advertising & BRAND NAME IN BOLD TYPE or profession so that users Promotion. can find a firm by knowing DESCRIPTIVE TEXT the phrase or word that or describes its type of APPROPRIATE TradeMark business. SALES MESSAGE LISTINGS are for IDENTIFICA- Optional Line "WHERE TO BUY IT" TION under all applicable Captions distinguish between Dealer headings. manufacturer-dealer- Firm Name in Regular Type distributor, etc. One Service Listing is provid- Dealer Name in Regular or ed with business phone ser- Address .......................000-0000 Dealer Name & Telephone BOLD TYPE vice. Additional listings pro- Address .......................000-0000 vide the very minimum in Number in Bold is optional. complete Yellow Pages iden- Trade Name Listings identify BRAND NAME IN BOLD TYPE tification. DEALER NAME IN REGULAR brands, but do not provide CAPITAL LETTERS Bold Telephone Numbers add FIRM NAME IN BOLD CAPITAL LETTERS space for Trade Marks or Address .......................000-0000 Address .......................000-0000 prominence & convenience text matter. to Column Indentification. Extra Line Information About Extra Lines provide a means Trade Extra Lines, Alternate Products or Services Up to 5 Call Listings, and Trade of emphasizing descriptive in- Words Per Line. formation. Directional Extra Lines are available under the Dealers Alternate Call Listing pro- name, subject
Recommended publications
  • Before the Washington, D.C. 20554 in the Matter of ) ) Section 63.71 Application of ) ) File No. Bellsouth Telecommunications, L

    Before the Washington, D.C. 20554 in the Matter of ) ) Section 63.71 Application of ) ) File No. Bellsouth Telecommunications, L

    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Section 63.71 Application of ) ) File No. BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC ) Illinois Bell Telephone Company, LLC ) Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated ) Michigan Bell Telephone Company ) Nevada Bell Telephone Company ) Pacific Bell Telephone Company ) Southwestern Bell Telephone Company ) The Ohio Bell Telephone Company ) Wisconsin Bell, Inc. ) ) For Authority Pursuant to Section 214 of ) The Communications Act of 1934, As Amended, ) To Discontinue the Provision of Service ) SECTION 63.71 APPLICATION OF AT&T AT&T Services, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates, BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Alabama, AT&T Florida, AT&T Georgia, AT&T Kentucky, AT&T Louisiana, AT&T Mississippi, AT&T North Carolina, AT&T South Carolina, and AT&T Tennessee; Illinois Bell Telephone Company, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Illinois; Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated, d/b/a AT&T Indiana; Michigan Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T Michigan; Nevada Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T Nevada; Pacific Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T California; Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T Arkansas, AT&T Kansas, AT&T Missouri, AT&T Oklahoma, and AT&T Texas; The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T Ohio; and Wisconsin Bell, Inc., d/b/a AT&T Wisconsin, (collectively referred to herein as “AT&T”) applies for authority under Section 214(a) of the Communications Act, as amended (“the Act”), 47 U.S.C. § 214, and Section 63.71 of the Federal Communications Commission’s (“Commission”) rules, 47 C.F.R.
  • AT&T Benefits

    AT&T Benefits

    GET STARTED CONTACT INFO Where to go for COPIES AND CLAIMS more information Important Benefits Contacts � January 2017 OTHER NIN: 78-39607 Please keep this document for future reference GET STARTED Contents Important Information This document is a one-stop reference guide Distribution About this document Distributed to all employees and Agent for service of process for frequently called numbers, websites and other eligible former employees How do I look up a contact (including LTD recipients) of all important AT&T benefits contact information. AT&T companies (excluding CONTACT INFO employees of AT&T Support Services Company, Inc.; Este documento contiene un aviso y la información bargained employees of AT&T COPIES AND CLAIMS Alascom, Inc., and international en Inglés. Si usted tiene dificultad en la comprensión employees not on U.S. payroll). de este documento, por favor comuníquese con Distributed to alternate payees OTHER and beneficiaries receiving AT&T Benefits Center, 877-722-0020. benefits from the retirement plans. This document replaces your existing Where to Go Distributed to COBRA participants, recipients of company-extended On the left side of each for More Information: Contact Information for coverage, surviving dependents page, you will find navigation and alternate recipients bars that allow you to quickly Employee Benefits Plans and Programs SMM dated (QMCSOs) of the populations noted above receiving benefits move between sections. January 2015. from the health and welfare plans. Where to go for more information | January 2017 1 Contents Important information ....................................... 5 PDF NAVIGATION: What action do I need to take? ................................... 5 How do I use this document? ....................................
  • Ameritech PART 21 SECTION 1 Tariff

    Ameritech PART 21 SECTION 1 Tariff

    INDIANA BELL IURC NO. 20 TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. Ameritech PART 21 SECTION 1 Tariff PART 21 - Access Services SECTION 1 - General Original Sheet No. 1 ACCESS SERVICE Regulations, Rates and Charges applying to the provision of Access Services within a Local Access and Transport Area (LATA) or equivalent Market Area for connection to intrastate communications facilities for customers within the operating territory of the INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, INCORPORATED Access Services are provided by means of wire, fiber optics, radio and any other suitable technology or a combination thereof. Material formerly appeared in T-8 Tariff, Part 5 , Sheet 1. Effective: July 19, 1995 N. L. Cubellis Vice President-Regulatory Filename: Part 21 Section 1_001.doc Directory: D:\indiana Template: D:\Documents and Settings\ydqkckr\Application Data\Microsoft\Templates\Normal.dot Title: INDIANA BELL Subject: Author: PEGGY Keywords: Comments: Creation Date: 5/15/1995 2:37:00 PM Change Number: 42 Last Saved On: 7/21/2008 1:17:00 PM Last Saved By: Licensed User Total Editing Time: 110 Minutes Last Printed On: 9/3/2008 2:35:00 PM As of Last Complete Printing Number of Pages: 1 Number of Words: 115 (approx.) Number of Characters: 659 (approx.) Indiana Bell IURC NO. 20 Telephone Company, Inc. AT&T TARIFF Part 21 Section 1 PART 21 - Access Services 1st Revised Sheet 2 SECTION 1 - General Cancels Original Sheet 2 Concurrence Statement Submitted herewith pursuant to CAUSE NO. 39369, THIRD ORDER ON CONTINUING THE LIFTING OF THE STAY OF PROCESSING PETITIONS TO MAINTAIN PARITY ACCESS AND ORDER ON LESS THAN ALL THE ISSUES, approved April 30, 1993 and placed into effect and made final June 2, 1993 Indiana Bell hereby concurs and adopts by reference the terms and provisions of its interstate access tariff except as noted in the Table of Contents of the Indiana Bell Ameritech Operating Companies Tariff F.C.C.
  • Pacific Telesis Understands the Anxiety Over Job Retention and Growth That Can Arise When Two Major Businesses Merge. This Merger Is a Job-Growth Agreement

    Pacific Telesis Understands the Anxiety Over Job Retention and Growth That Can Arise When Two Major Businesses Merge. This Merger Is a Job-Growth Agreement

    JOBS IN CALIFORNIA Pacific Telesis understands the anxiety over job retention and growth that can arise when two major businesses merge. This merger is a job-growth agreement. To show confidence and good faith, Pacific Telesis agrees to the following: • The headquarters for Pacific Bell and Nevada Bell will remain in California and Nevada, respectively. In addition, a new company headquarters will be established in California that will provide integrated administrative and support services for the combined companies. Three subsidiary headquarters will also be established in California. These subsidiaries are long distance services, international operations and Internet. • The merged companies commit to expanding employment by at least one thousand jobs in Califomia over what would otherwise have been the case under previous plans if this merger had not occurred. The merged companies will report their progress to the CPUC within two years. CONSTRUCTION Nothing in this Commitment shall be interpreted to require Pacific Bell or Pacific Telesis to give any preference or advantage based on race, creed, sex, national origin, sexual orientation, disability or any other basis in connection with employment, contracting Of other activities in violation of any federal, state or local law. Nothing herein shall be construed to establish or require quotas or timetables in connection with any • undertakings by Pacific Bell or Pacific Telesis to maintain a diverse workforce, contract with minority vendors, or provide services to underserved communities. -. 8 PARTNERSHiP COMMITMENT This Commitment is a ten-year partnership and commitment to the underserved communities of California. In furtherance of this par:tnership, Pacific Bell is undertaking an obligation to the Community Technology Fund that may extend over a decade or more as well as a seven-year commitment to the Universal Service Task Force.
  • AT&T Debt Information

    AT&T Debt Information

    AT&T Inc. and Subsidiary Debt Detail - September 30, 2010 This chart shows the principal amount of AT&T Inc.'s and its subsidiaries' outstanding long-term debt issues as of the date above. AT&T intends to update this chart quarterly after filing its Form 10-Q or Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Outstanding Long-term Notes and Debentures Amount Outstanding at Unconditional Guarantee Entity (Original Issuer) Maturity Coupon Maturity Date Current Portion Long-term Portion Total by AT&T Inc. SBC Communications Inc. $1,000,000,000 5.300% 11/15/2010 $1,000,000,000 - $1,000,000,000 AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. $3,000,000,000 7.875% 3/1/2011 $3,000,000,000 - $3,000,000,000 SBC Communications Inc. $1,250,000,000 6.250% 3/15/2011 $1,250,000,000 - $1,250,000,000 BellSouth Corporation $1,000,000,000 4.295% 4/26/2021 (a) $1,000,000,000 - $1,000,000,000 Yes BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. $152,555,337 6.300% 12/15/2015 $24,012,263 $128,543,074 $152,555,337 Ameritech Capital Funding Corporation $59,802,300 9.100% 6/1/2016 $7,299,540 $52,502,760 $59,802,300 Various $112,492,335 Various Various $103,734,725 $8,757,610 $112,492,335 BellSouth Corporation $1,000,000,000 6.000% 10/15/2011 - $1,000,000,000 $1,000,000,000 AT&T Corp. $1,500,000,000 7.300% 11/15/2011 - $1,500,000,000 $1,500,000,000 Yes Cingular Wireless LLC $750,000,000 6.500% 12/15/2011 - $750,000,000 $750,000,000 SBC Communications Inc.
  • • Affidavit of Robert Jason Weller (Ameritech Director O/Corporate Strategy Discusses How the SBC/Ameritech Merger Advances Am

    • Affidavit of Robert Jason Weller (Ameritech Director O/Corporate Strategy Discusses How the SBC/Ameritech Merger Advances Am

    • Affidavit ofRobert Jason Weller (Ameritech Director o/Corporate Strategy discusses how the SBC/Ameritech merger advances Ameritech 's strategic objectives and improves its ability to serve its customers) • Affidavit ofPaul G. Osland (Ameritech Director o/Corporate Strategy explains the background and current status 0/Ameritech's test involving the resale 0/local service to residential cellular customers in St. Louis) • Affidavit ofFrancis X. Pampush (Ameritech Director o/Economic and Policy Studies describes the nature and extent oflocal service competition in Ameritech's region) • Affidavit ofWharton B. Rivers (President 0/Ameritech Network Services discusses customer service quality objectives) • Affidavit ofRichard 1. Gilbert and Robert G. Harris (Economists address the consumer effects o/the SBC/Ameritech merger) SBC Communications Inc. 1997 Audited Financial Statements • Maps 1. 30 Markets Targeted for SBC's National-Local Strategy 2. SBC/Ameritech Local Service Area -'.'" Competitive Networks - Little Rock, Arkansas 4. Competitive Networks - San Francisco, California 5. Competitive Networks - San Jose, California 6. Competitive Networks - PetalumalNapa, California 7. Competitive Networks - Sacramento, California 8. Competitive Networks - Stockton, California 9. Competitive Networks - Fresno, California 10. Competitive Networks - Los Angeles, California 11. Competitive Networks - Anaheim, California 12. Competitive Networks - San Diego, California 13. Competitive Networks - Wichita, Kansas 14. Competitive Networks - Kansas City, Kansas and Missouri 15. Competitive Networks - St. Louis, Missouri 16. Competitive Networks - Springfield, Missouri 17. Competitive Networks - Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 18. Competitive Networks - Tulsa, Oklahoma 19. Competitive Networks - Austin, Texas 20. Competitive Networks - Corpus Christi, Texas 21. Competitive Networks - Dallas, Texas 22. Competitive Networks - Fort Worth, Texas ?'"--'. Competitive Networks - Houston, Texas 24. Competitive Networks - San Antonio, Texas v 25.
  • List of Affiliates

    List of Affiliates

    LIST OF AFFILIATES 33C Global Services, Inc, Furnishes telecommunications and systems integration products to customers and operates divisions which sell and service voice systems for business use. SBC International. Inc. Holding company for SBC subsidiaries and affiliates operating internationallywhose interests are in foreign telecommunications and other related businesses. SBC Internet Services, Inc. Internet service provider. SBC Laboratories, Inc. (FDC exception applies) Involved in applications research; the preparation of general generic specifications for products; the testing and evaluation of manutacturers' designs and products to determine if the general specification? set by the various SBC subsidiaries are being met; and writing applications software for computers with processing systems that have been designed to be user-programmed. SBC Long Distance, LLC (Section 272 Affiliate) Provides interexchange services. SBC Management Services, L.P. (FDC exception applies) Provides various administrative and support services for the parent holding company and other subsidiaries. SBC Management Services. USA, (FDC exception applies) Provides various administrative and support Inc. services for the parent holding company and other subsidiaries. SBC Operations, Inc. (FDC exception applies) Includes the development and design of business processes to provide for the planning, development and other support for the sale and merchandising of telecommunications services and products as well as a single point of contact for customers. SBC Services, Inc. (FDC exception applies) Performs centralized administrative support services including Information Technology and Billing Support Services, Real Estate Support Services, Procurement Support Services, Human Resources Support Services, Training Services and Finance Support Services. SBC Telecom, Inc. Competitive local exchange carrier. SNET America, Inc. lnterexchange service provider through carrier alliances.
  • Recent Developments in Telecommunications Law

    Recent Developments in Telecommunications Law

    RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS LAW ANGELA D. O’BRIEN* INTRODUCTION It has been four years since President Clinton signed the revolutionary and ambitious Telecommunications Act of 19961 (“TA 96” or “the Act”) in order to remove barriers to competition in the local telecommunications market and provide all Americans with access to affordable telecommunications service. Since that time, and particularly within the past year, there have been a large number of regulatory and judicial decisions at the federal and state levels that endeavor to implement the goals of the Act and to regulate telecommunications carriers under specific provisions of state law. This Article reviews some of the significant developments in federal and Indiana telecommunications law2 for the period of October 1, 1998 to October 31, 1999. I. IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL COMPETITION The Act’s goal is to eliminate barriers to local competition in the telecommunications marketplace by requiring that incumbent local exchange carriers (“ILECs”) provide access to their networks to competitive local exchange carriers (“CLECs”). This access is facilitated by requiring ILECs (1) to permit a requesting new entrant in the [ILEC’s] local market to interconnect with the [ILEC’s] existing local network and thereby use the [ILEC’s] network to compete with the [ILEC] in providing telephone services (interconnection); (2) to provide its competing * J.D., 1998, Indiana University School of Law—Indianapolis. The author is an Associate in the Chicago office of Mayer, Brown & Platt and a former Associate of Barnes & Thornburg, Indianapolis. The views expressed in this Survey are the author’s own, and do not necessarily reflect those of the attorneys at Mayer, Brown & Platt or Barnes & Thornburg.
  • Charter Cable Versus Direct Tv

    Charter Cable Versus Direct Tv

    Charter Cable Versus Direct Tv Waylen gulls fulgently while exact Elroy noddled hortatorily or fullers resentfully. Revulsive Archy planishdepartmentalize, her tsarevna his Laodiceainfirmly and riff unloosed tetanizes abstractively.tho. Praedial and thirstiest Godfry uncover while subsiding Socrates Free money and services were getting a single place we can provide standard rates a permit requirements have given a charter tv can go with a good internet Both cable to satellite television services can advance during bad weather, although durable is more vague with satellite providers. You have direct broadcast is charter cable versus direct tv comparison sites for. York spoke at his Cox counterpart or twenty minutes and his Charter counterpart on a boot or voicemail lasting about thirty seconds. Ameritech acquires tvsm inc, charter cable versus direct tv technology to determine if you. Do not last week if you get a question, and nationwide networks, california public statement to charter cable versus direct tv, such action when there are unable to rent, expanding into separate public companies. The formation of beating out what kind of charter cable versus direct tv provider for. Surround sound fairly small towns grant cable argues that charter cable versus direct tv into the tier that? Of statutory authority prior to operating the availability based on tv! The deal with amazon and, really adds onto your email access exclusive access to validate your alarm with. Several internet service provider in areas of your area for specific channels you will the charter cable versus direct tv setsnine months after a lackluster year but charges. We do the red nav on cable tv.
  • Ameritech Corp

    Ameritech Corp

    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filing Date: 1994-03-31 | Period of Report: 1993-12-31 SEC Accession No. 0000950124-94-000670 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER AMERITECH CORP /DE/ Business Address 30 S WACKER DR CIK:732715| IRS No.: 363251481 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 CHICAGO IL 60606 Type: 10-K | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-08612 | Film No.: 94519541 3127505000 SIC: 4813 Telephone communications (no radiotelephone) Copyright © 2012 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document 1 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K /X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED)......FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993 OR / / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-8612 AMERITECH CORPORATION <TABLE> <S> <C> A DELAWARE CORPORATION I.R.S. Employer No. 36-3251481 </TABLE> 30 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606 TELEPHONE NUMBER 312-750-5000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock (Par Value $1.00 Per Share) Preference Stock Purchase Rights Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Exchanges on which registered: Common Stock: New York, Chicago, Boston, Pacific and Philadelphia Preference Stock Purchase Rights: New York Based on the average sales price on February 28, 1994, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates was $22,074,804,907.
  • AT&T Inc. and Subsidiary Debt Detail

    AT&T Inc. and Subsidiary Debt Detail

    AT&T Inc. and Subsidiary Debt Detail - June 30, 2020 This chart shows the principal amount of AT&T Inc.'s and its subsidiaries' outstanding long -term debt issues as of the date above. AT&T intends to update this chart quarterly after filing its Form 10-Q or Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Outstanding Long-term Notes and Debentures Amount Outstanding at Unconditional Guarantee Entity (Original Issuer) Coupon Maturity Date Current Portion Long-term Portion Total Maturity by AT&T Inc. Various $1,664,410,714 (a) various various $1,215,774,429 $448,636,285 $1,664,410,714 AT&T Inc. $592,000,000 Zero 11/27/2022 (b) $527,017,731 $0 $527,017,731 AT&T Inc. € 2,250,000,000 Floating 8/3/2020 $2,527,650,000 $0 $2,527,650,000 AT&T Inc. CAD 1,000,000,000 3.825% 11/25/2020 $736,593,989 $0 $736,593,989 AT&T Inc. € 1,000,000,000 1.875% 12/4/2020 $1,123,400,000 $0 $1,123,400,000 AT&T Inc. $1,500,000,000 Floating 6/1/2021 $1,500,000,000 $0 $1,500,000,000 AT&T Inc. $1,500,000,000 Floating 7/15/2021 $0 $1,500,000,000 $1,500,000,000 AT&T Inc. € 1,000,000,000 2.650% 12/17/2021 $0 $1,123,400,000 $1,123,400,000 Michigan Bell Telephone Company $81,390,000 7.850% 1/15/2022 $0 $81,390,000 $81,390,000 AT&T Inc.
  • Telephomania: the Contested Origins of the Urban Telephone Operating Company in the United States, 1879-1894

    Telephomania: the Contested Origins of the Urban Telephone Operating Company in the United States, 1879-1894

    Telephomania: The Contested Origins of the Urban Telephone Operating Company in the United States, 1879-1894 Richard John Great Cities Institute College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago Great Cities Institute Publication Number: GCP-05-02 A Great Cities Institute Working Paper JUNE 2005 The Great Cities Institute The Great Cities Institute is an interdisciplinary, applied urban research unit within the College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). Its mission is to create, disseminate, and apply interdisciplinary knowledge on urban areas. Faculty from UIC and elsewhere work collaboratively on urban issues through interdisciplinary research, outreach and education projects. About the Author Richard John is Associate Professor of History in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of Illinois at Chicago. He may be contacted at [email protected]. Great Cities Institute Publication Number: GCP-05-02 The views expressed in this report represent those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Great Cities Institute or the University of Illinois at Chicago. This is a working paper that represents research in progress. Inclusion here does not preclude final preparation for publication elsewhere. Great Cities Institute (MC 107) College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago 412 S. Peoria Street, Suite 400 Chicago IL 60607-7067 Phone: 312-996-8700 Fax: 312-996-8933 http://www.uic.edu/cuppa/gci UIC Great Cities Institute Telephomania: The Contested Origins of the Urban Telephone Operating Company in the United States, 1879-1894 This essay reconsiders the origins of the urban telephone exchange in the United States in the formative era of commercial telephony that stretched from 1879 and 1894.