DOCSLIB.ORG

Twilight of Empire: the Brest-Litovsk Conference and the Remaking of East-Central Europe, 1917-1918'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Twilight of Empire: the Brest-Litovsk Conference and the Remaking of East-Central Europe, 1917-1918' H-SHERA Kasmach on Chernev, 'Twilight of Empire: The Brest-Litovsk Conference and the Remaking of East-Central Europe, 1917-1918' Review published on Tuesday, March 17, 2020 Borislav Chernev. Twilight of Empire: The Brest-Litovsk Conference and the Remaking of East- Central Europe, 1917-1918. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2017. 328 pp. $36.95 (pdf), ISBN 978-1-4875-1334-4; $79.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-4875-0149-5; $36.95 (e-book), ISBN 978-1-4875-1335-1. Reviewed by Lizaveta Kasmach (Independent Scholar) Published on H-SHERA (March, 2020) Commissioned by Hanna Chuchvaha (University of Calgary) Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=53851 Borislav Chernev’s Twilight of Empire offers a unique study of the first peace negotiations of the First World War, leading to the signing of two peace treaties in Brest-Litovsk by the Central Powers and Ukraine on February 9, 1918, and the Central Powers and Russia on March 3, 1918. Aiming to look beyond the traditional notion of Brest-Litovsk as a settlement imposed by Germany on Russia, Chernev meticulously explores the course and backgrounds of the peace negotiations as well as the implications of the diplomatic proceedings on a number of different actors apart from the obvious Russo-German bilateral negotiation dynamic. With a focus on the entire region of East-Central Europe in 1917-18, Twilight of Empire ultimately seeks to explain imperial dissolution and the rise of the concept of national self-determination. Analyzing various historiographical traditions (British, German, Ukrainian, Ukrainian Soviet, Russian, Soviet, post-Soviet, Belarusian, and Bulgarian) in evaluating Brest-Litovsk peace, Chernev formulates his chief approach in this study by choosing to treat negotiations outcomes from multiple perspectives since they went “beyond influencing any single nation, affecting rather the wider region of East-Central Europe thus ushering in an era of unparalleled ideological struggle which dominated Europe’s twentieth century” (p. 11). Consequently, from the very start, Chernev adopts a broad geographical definition of East-Central Europe, seeing it spatially as the areas between the Elbe and Dnieper Rivers, reminding readers of a similar focus in Timothy Snyder’s Bloodlands (2010). In this context, Twilight of Empire offers a view on the origins and reordering of this particular region during the final stages of World War I. The value and novelty of this book is precisely in refocusing readers’ attention to the rather forgotten and short-lived first peace treaty of the war as the “focal point of the interrelated processes of peacemaking, revolutions, imperial collapse, and nation state creation in the multi-ethnic, entangled spaces of East-Central Europe during a decade-long continuum of violence between 1914 and 1923” (p. 4). Referring to Peter Holquist’s understanding that World War I in Eastern Europe transformed in other violent conflicts that lasted way beyond 1918 (Making War, Forging Revolution: Russia’s Continuum of Crisis, 1914-1921 [2002]), Chernev describes in detail how and why the ending phase of the war was about to introduce the great ideological struggles of the twentieth century. Citation: H-Net Reviews. Kasmach on Chernev, 'Twilight of Empire: The Brest-Litovsk Conference and the Remaking of East-Central Europe, 1917-1918'. H-SHERA. 03-17-2020. https://networks.h-net.org/node/166842/reviews/6020959/kasmach-chernev-twilight-empire-brest-litovsk-conference-and-remaking Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-SHERA Chernev demonstrates an excellent command of Western, Soviet, and post-Soviet literature on the subject as well as all relevant historiographical debates, which requires a good working knowledge of at least several foreign languages. More important, he introduces previously overlooked Bulgarian and Austrian government documents as sources. These allow an insight into Bulgarian and Ottoman policies for a better interpretation of relations between Germany and Austria-Hungary in the final stages of World War I. An important and novel thesis arising from this analysis is a picture of a “less united, less German-dominated Central Powers alliance, with a greater divergence of individual policies and multiple foci of agency” (p. 6). To give a better introduction for a reader outside of this specific area, the book starts with several maps and a glossary introducing all the major protagonists whom the reader will encounter. The extensive use of diaries gives a more intimate look into the circumstances and reasoning of diplomats. Throughout the book, Chernev also skillfully intersperses his narration with curious details and little anecdotes, creating an illusion of transporting his readers back in time (first encounters of Central Powers’ aristocrats with inexperienced Bolshevik delegates, Bolsheviks bringing a barrel of caviar to Christmas dinner, rowdy behavior of the peasant delegate Stashkov, etc.). Structurally, the book consists of six chapters, with the major focus on Central Powers’ and Bolshevik positions regarding the approach to peace negotiations, the diplomatic history of the peace conference, and the evolution of national self-determination principle at the center of the story. Separate chapters present a detailed analysis of the repercussions that Brest-Litovsk proceedings had for Austria-Hungary, Ukraine, and Bulgaria. Setting the scene, chapter 1 introduces Central Powers’ and Bolshevik approaches (signing separate peace and territorial gains in the western borderland of the former Russian Empire versus Bolshevik utopian dreams of world revolution). The following chapter focuses on the start of negotiations in mid-December 1917 and the second phase of negotiations in January 1918 in Brest-Litovsk, a destroyed city in the borderlands, where Ober Ost staff headquarters chose to move. Describing the initial encounters of Central Powers’ diplomats with the Bolshevik delegation, Chernev shows the debut of the self-determination concept, originating from the latter’s idealistic peace aspirations, based on “no annexations,” “no indemnities,” and demands of guaranteeing national self-determination and minority rights (so-called Ioffe Program). What follows is a careful comparison of the Ioffe Program to the Fourteen Points by Woodrow Wilson, where Chernev suggests that Wilson’s approach was rooted in liberal internationalism, progressive history, and cooperation, while the Bolshevik vision prioritized commitment to class struggle and world revolution over declared idealistic goals. While the Central Powers hoped to instrumentalize national self-determination to gain more territorial control in the East, the Bolsheviks wanted to delay proceedings at Brest-Litovsk hoping that the world revolution would break out soon. These hopes were indeed close to coming true in Austria-Hungary, which was the most affected by the delay in the peace treaty and food crisis. Chapter 3 describes in detail why the Great January Strike in Austria-Hungary did not grow into a revolution, comparing it to the Russian Revolution. Chernev points out that the army and governing structures in Austria-Hungary remained intact and effective, managing to secure food shipments and successfully negotiating with social-democratic leaders, who were moderate in their demands. The absence of radicalism and functioning governing institutions averted the revolution, allowing Austria- Citation: H-Net Reviews. Kasmach on Chernev, 'Twilight of Empire: The Brest-Litovsk Conference and the Remaking of East-Central Europe, 1917-1918'. H-SHERA. 03-17-2020. https://networks.h-net.org/node/166842/reviews/6020959/kasmach-chernev-twilight-empire-brest-litovsk-conference-and-remaking Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-SHERA Hungary to focus on peacemaking. Chapter 4 deals with the Ukrainian dimension of Brest-Litovsk, tracing the origins of Ukrainian national statehood to the peace negotiations. Chernev’s thesis here is that in 1918, Ukraine owed its existence to the Brest-Litovsk system, reinforced by the presence of the Central Powers’ troops. Introducing Austrian archival documents to the debate, Chernev states that Brest-Litovsk provided Ukrainian national elites with the diplomatic, political, and economic framework for national mobilization or, as Chernev chooses to refer to this process, Ukrainization policies, which anticipated Soviet indigenization. At this point, another example of Belarusian national mobilization could have helped the author to evaluate timely Ukrainian momentum for using national self-determination discourse. Even though they failed, Belarusian aspirations nevertheless could have provided an additional framework for highlighting the meaning of Brest-Litovsk for state-building processes in this period. Chapter 5 deals with the Bulgarian dimension of Brest-Litovsk, and another sort of aspirations—to achieve regional hegemony and reclaim the lost “dream of Byzantium” (p. 158). Chernev demonstrates how Bulgarian diplomats chose the highest stakes and lost their struggle for the recognition of extended Bulgarian borders. These goals eventually exposed weaknesses of the Central Powers, threatening the very existence of the alliance. On another level, this analysis of failed illusions of grandeur also shows the weak footing of seeking national consolidation on the basis of regional hegemony as the only source
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unit 3 Study Guide Name: Date: 1. in 1900 the United States Declared An
    Unit 3 Study Guide Name: Date: 1. In 1900 the United States declared an Open 3. Which of the following is the most accurate Door Policy that reflected which of the following example of President Taft's policy of “dollar beliefs? diplomacy”? A. The Chinese were secretly negotiating trade A. allowing for the nationalization of Latin privileges with European countries. American property owned by U.S. citizens B. Japan might conquer China and cut off all B. exerting economic influence rather than foreign trade. military force in Latin American countries C. All countries should have equal trading rights C. using international trade organizations to in China. stabilize Latin American economies D. American consumers would be hurt by D. maintaining a military force to discourage international trade. European colonization in Latin America 4. How did the United States help the Allies win 2. The United States' policy of acting as an World War I? international police force in the Western Hemisphere can be traced back to the early 1900s and the— A. The United States entered into a secret agreement with the Central Powers. A. Marshall Plan. B. The United States agreed to provide financial assistance to rebuild Germany. B. Roosevelt Corollary. C. The United States refused to fight an offensive C. Open Door Notes. war. D. Dawes Plan. D. The United States provided strong, energized troops. page 1 5. “Remember the Maine” is a memorable slogan 7. This graphic organizer represents U.S. involvement and rallying cry in American history. The slogan in the First World War. symbolizes the onset of which of the following wars? A.
    [Show full text]
  • German Eastern Policy, 1917–1918 Joachim Tauber German Eastern Policy in the Period Between the Withdrawal of Russia From
    LITHUANIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES 13 2008 ISSN 1392-2343 PP. 67–74 GERMAN EASTERN POLICY, 1917–1918 Joachim Tauber ABSTRACT This paper analyzes German eastern policy in the years 1917 and 1918. It shows the German concept for the future of Poland and Lithuania that only took shape after German armies had occupied these countries. The Polish question remained the main problem for the German leadership not being able to decide how to cope with Polish national aspirations without ceding part of territory of the German Empire. The collapse of Russia and the two revolutions in 1917 still widened the German aspiration in the East culminating in the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk that clearly revealed German ambitions. German eastern policy in the period between the withdrawal of Russia from the war in the autumn of 1917 and the collapse of the German Empire in November 1918 was the ultimate culmination of a process which began in the summer of 1914. Therefore, I begin this brief presentation with a discussion of the events of 1914 since the underlying visions and plans of the German leadership remained more or less the same throughout the war: only the actual possibi- lities of their implementation, radicalisation of plans and political rhetoric altered. At the time when public discussions about the war aims of Germany 1 were not possible until the very end of 1916, due to censorship restrictions, heated arguments in the leadership of the empire began already at the end of the summer of 1914 and the so-called ‘September Programme’ of Bethmann Hollweg, the impe- 1 The war aims of Germany were an object of a number of discussions and publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Belarusian National Movement in The
    EVOLUTION OF THE BELARUSIAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT IN THE PAGES OF PERIODICALS (1914-1917) By Aliaksandr Bystryk Submitted to Central European University Nationalism Studies Program In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Advisor: Professor Maria Kovacs Secondary advisor: Professor Alexei Miller CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2013 Abstract Belarusian national movement is usually characterised by its relative weakness delayed emergence and development. Being the weakest movement in the region, before the WWI, the activists of this movement mostly engaged in cultural and educational activities. However at the end of First World War Belarusian national elite actively engaged in political struggles happening in the territories of Western frontier of the Russian empire. Thus the aim of the thesis is to explain how the events and processes caused by WWI influenced the national movement. In order to accomplish this goal this thesis provides discourse and content analysis of three editions published by the Belarusian national activists: Nasha Niva (Our Field), Biełarus (The Belarusian) and Homan (The Clamour). The main findings of this paper suggest that the anticipation of dramatic social and political changes brought by the war urged national elite to foster national mobilisation through development of various organisations and structures directed to improve social cohesion within Belarusian population. Another important effect of the war was that a part of Belarusian national elite formulated certain ideas and narratives influenced by conditions of Ober-Ost which later became an integral part of Belarusian national ideology. CEU eTD Collection i Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Between krajowość and West-Russianism: The Development of the Belarusian National Movement Prior to WWI .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Experience of the German Soldier on the Eastern Front
    AUTONOMY IN THE GREAT WAR: THE EXPERIENCE OF THE GERMAN SOLDIER ON THE EASTERN FRONT A THESIS IN History Presented to the Faculty of the University Of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS By Kevin Patrick Baker B.A. University of Kansas, 2007 Kansas City, Missouri 2012 ©2012 KEVIN PATRICK BAKER ALL RIGHTS RESERVED AUTONOMY IN THE GREAT WAR: THE EXPERIENCE OF THE GERMAN SOLDIER ON THE EASTERN FRONT Kevin Patrick Baker, Candidate for the Master of Arts Degree University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2012 ABSTRACT From 1914 to 1919, the German military established an occupation zone in the territory of present day Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia. Cultural historians have generally focused on the role of German soldiers as psychological and physical victims trapped in total war that was out of their control. Military historians have maintained that these ordinary German soldiers acted not as victims but as perpetrators causing atrocities in the occupied lands of the Eastern Front. This paper seeks to build on the existing scholarship on the soldier’s experience during the Great War by moving beyond this dichotomy of victim vs. perpetrator in order to describe the everyday existence of soldiers. Through the lens of individual selfhood, this approach will explore the gray areas that saturated the experience of war. In order to gain a better understanding of how ordinary soldiers appropriated individual autonomy in total war, this master’s thesis plans to use an everyday-life approach by looking at individual soldiers’ behaviors underneath the canopy of military hegemony.
    [Show full text]
  • Richter Revised
    University of Birmingham 'A mass which you could form into whatever you wanted' Richter, Klaus License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Richter, K 2017, 'A mass which you could form into whatever you wanted': Refugees and state building in Lithuania and Courland, 1914–21. in Europe on the move: Refugees in the era of the Great War. Cultural History of Modern War. Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Checked for eligibility: 03/05/2019 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Grades 9-12 Answer
    THE GREAT WAR Grades 9–12 Answer Key Answers listed below indicate main points and themes that students may address in their responses. Refer to research sources cited in the lessons, as well as the Great War videos, for additional answers. ACTIVITY SHEET 2 Middle Eastern Front Gallipoli. Turks and Allies together suffered about 250,000 casualties. Where Did They Fight? 1. Why was the Ottoman Empire considered the “sick man of Europe?” Eastern Front 3. How did the war help shape the The size and strength of the Ottoman modern Middle East? 1. How was the war on the Eastern Empire had made it one of the great The emergence of the modern Middle East Front different than the Western? powers of Europe for centuries, but by stems from WWI. The Ottoman Empire’s While the war on Western Front was the early 20th century, the Empire was in defeat in 1918 led to the partitioning of locked in a stalemate, a war of movement decline; it had lost much of its territory in its territory. The central Turkish homeland ensued on the Eastern Front. Russia was eastern Europe and was facing internal became the modern nation of Turkey able to supply vast amounts of troops, division and calls for independence and while the remaining lands were divided but had difficulty mobilizing and moving autonomy from its non-Turkish population. into British and French mandates based them, as well as producing enough Despite the Empire being known as the on the 1916 Sykes-Picot agreement. This weapons and supplies for them.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldiers, Rabbis, and the Ostjuden Under German Occupation: 1915-1918
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2010 Shattered Communities: Soldiers, Rabbis, and the Ostjuden under German Occupation: 1915-1918 Tracey Hayes Norrell [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, History of Religion Commons, Military History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Norrell, Tracey Hayes, "Shattered Communities: Soldiers, Rabbis, and the Ostjuden under German Occupation: 1915-1918. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2010. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/834 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Tracey Hayes Norrell entitled "Shattered Communities: Soldiers, Rabbis, and the Ostjuden under German Occupation: 1915-1918." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. Vejas G. Liulevicius, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend
    [Show full text]
  • Healy on Gerwarth, 'Empires at War, 1911-1923'
    H-Diplo Healy on Gerwarth, 'Empires at War, 1911-1923' Review published on Saturday, February 14, 2015 Robert Gerwarth, Erez Manela, eds. Empires at War, 1911-1923. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Illustrations, maps. 256 pp. $65.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-19-870251-1. Reviewed by Maureen Healy (Lewis and Clark College)Published on H-Diplo (February, 2015) Commissioned by Seth Offenbach Imperial encounters on a personal level happened during World War I and were written down long before historians of the war (Marxists excluded) began to employ “empire” as a category of analysis for understanding it. In his influential war memoir, Storm of Steel (1920), Ernst Jünger recalled such a moment of imperial contact on the western front. He and his men heard “strange jabbering” coming from the woods and discovered wounded enemy soldiers from whom “exotic calls and cries for help” could be heard. To Jünger’s interrogation “Quelle nation?” the enemy replied “Pauvre Rajput!” The German realized he had been fighting against a regiment of Indians “who had travelled thousands of miles across the sea, only to give themselves a bloody nose on this god-forsaken piece of earth against the Hanoverian Rifles.” A linguistic volley ensued. To ingratiate themselves with their captors, the Indians called out: “Anglais pas bon!” Jünger mused, “Why these people spoke French I couldn’t quite understand. The whole scene—the mixture of the prisoners’ laments and our jubilation—had something primordial about it. This wasn’t war; it was ancient history.”[1] What brought these two men, Jünger and the Indian, face to face in the mud? The volume under review will answer: empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Opinion About Treaty of Versailles
    Russian Opinion About Treaty Of Versailles Michail coordinated his ogles incense irreproachably, but spicier Windham never rattle so cousin. Infanticidal and full-rigged hisPadraig slat misworship. still knock-up his infiltrator counterfeitly. Nastier and tickling Terrill loafs almost gravely, though Jehu cross-referring Now act as unemployment and build poland to versailles treaty of course of french people and conditions In Russia the weed of the Romanovs in February 1917 was. The fuel that imperialism benefited the colonies and evidence. The pigeon that ended Russia's participation in the First World school was signed. One can abandon the dictum of the Versailles Treaty that Germany and her allies. Security failed and Germany blatantly defied the Versailles Treaty and invaded the. Below view some trap the main causes of many War 2 The shirt of Versailles ended World War deal between Germany and the Allied Powers Because Germany had lost the war and treaty just very harsh against Germany Germany was forced to check the responsibility of perpetual war damages suffered by the Allies. Empire cast and the iron of Tsarist Russia by its fellow Dominic. The National Archives Learning Curve Making peace. Russia's role in and views on the international order became an option topic highlight it. Biden faces first female policy test with Russian balancing act. Unconditional satisfaction of labor shortage of the treaty of russian versailles subjected to deny germany should be. Russia was later part yes the Versailles Peace Treaty which ended the. David Lloyd George of Great Britain had two views on how Germany. Approach proceeded from the ratio that NATO alongside five other European.
    [Show full text]
  • Vejas Gabriel Liulevicius
    Vejas Gabriel Liulevicius Director, Center for the Study of War and Society Lindsay Young Professor Professor, Department of History 915 Volunteer Boulevard 6th Floor, Dunford Hall University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-4065 (865) 974-7320 e-mail: [email protected] http://web.utk.edu/~history/faculty/f-liulevicius.htm EDUCATION University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA: Ph.D., Modern European History, 1994 Fields: Modern Germany; Russia and Eastern Europe; Cultural History Dissertation: "War Land: Peoples, Lands, and National Identity on the Eastern Front in World War I." ACTR Summer Russian Language Program in Moscow and Leningrad, USSR, 1989 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA: M.A., Modern European History, 1989 University of Chicago, Chicago, IL: B.A. with General Honors in the College; Special Honors in History, 1988 Senior Thesis: "Karl Follen: The Self-Invented Man." (awarded Emile Karafiol Prize) Director: Dr. Michael Geyer PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Director, Center for the Study of War and Society, from 2008. Full Professor, Dept. of History, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, from 2010. Associate Professor, Dept. of History, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 2001-10. Assistant Professor, Dept. of History, University of Tennessee, Knoxville,1995-2001. Visiting Scholar, Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University, 1994-1995. Teaching Assistant, University of Pennsylvania, 1990-1991. FOREIGN LANGUAGES German (fluent), Russian (reading), Danish (reading), Lithuanian (fluent). Liulevicius, 2 PUBLICATIONS Books The German Myth of the East: 1800 to the Present (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009). War Land on the Eastern Front: Culture, National Identity, and German Occupation in World War I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000). Kriegsland im Osten.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany's “Neuland” in the Baltic? Efforts to Colonize and Germanize
    Ron Hellfritzsch Universität Greifswald Germany’s “Neuland” in the Baltic? Efforts to Colonize and Germanize Courland. 1914–1919 Since the well-known works of Aba Stražas and Vejas Gabriel Liulevicius, the German “Ober Ost” military administration in the Baltic during the First World War is often characterized as a kind of “colonial regime”. Liulevicius especially tried to picture “Ober Ost” as a link between the First World and in some parts even the overseas colonial activities of the German Empire on one side and the Nazi aims to conquer “space” in Eastern Europe. The main thesis of Liulevicius is that the experience of German soldiers here in the occupied Baltic led to a fundamental change of how the Germans viewed Eastern Europe in general. Furthermore, Liulevicus points out that “Ober Ost” didn’t have any elaborated concepts as to how to rule the occupied territory and what its future should be, thus the leaders of the German military administration had to improvise and finally developed their own “military utopia”. In current research Liulevicius’ theses have gained support, but a lot of criticism as well. For example, a recently published dissertation shows that a German “colonial view toward the East” had already been established in the 19th century. A different study about space in Germany history regards the occupation policy of “Ober Ost” as a transfer of colonial thinking, which had been originally developed for overseas territories, to Europe. The dissertation project presented here follows an approach which connects the arguments of both sides. An analysis of documents of German civilian and military planners engaged in Easter European affairs during the First World War reveals that the Baltic was imagined as the ideal “space” for future German colonization.
    [Show full text]
  • War Land on the Eastern Front: Culture, National Identity, and German Occupation in World War I Vejas Gabriel Liulevicius Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521661579 - War Land on the Eastern Front: Culture, National Identity, and German Occupation in World War I Vejas Gabriel Liulevicius Index More information Index agriculture, 61, 65–71, 72 Banse, Ewald, 253 estates, 66, 69 Barbarossa, Operation, 266 exhibitions, 69, 162 Bartov, Omer, 5, 267 experiments, 96 Basanavicˇius, Jonas, 200 German plans for, 68–69, 199 Baumann, Hans, 263 problems, 68–69 Bavaria, 35 soil reports, 94 Bebel, August, 24 surveys, 94 Belarus and Belarusians, 31, 62, 132, 192 Allies, assistance to Baltic republics, 229, art, 139 231–32, 242 German views of, 120–21 Alsace-Lorraine, 35, 95 language, 118 Alsatian soldiers, 187–89, 213, 218 newspaper for, 123 Angarietis, Zigmas, 228 schools and, 125 anti-Semitism, 58, 61, 120, 132, 163 Soviet Lit-Bel, 229 Nazi, 256, 265, 267, 268, 270 Belgium, 56, 95, 100, 165 archaeology, 37–38 Louvain, 129 Armenians, 259 Below, von, 17 Armistice, 229–30 Bermondt, see Avalov-Bermondt August Wilhelm of Prussia, Prince, 58 Bertkau, Friedrich, 115 Auschwitz, 241 Bethmann Hollweg, Theobald von, 23, Austria, 16, 204, 257 164, 170, 196–97 autarchy, 64–65 Bialowies forest, 20, 27, 72, 199 Auxiliary Service Law, 55 Bialystok-Grodno, 21 Avalov-Bermondt, Pavel, 232, 242 administration of, 55, 58, 61–62, 198 riots, 69 Baden, Max von, 214 schools, 124 Balodis, Janis, 231 Bingen, 196 Balodis Brigade, 230 BischoV, Josef, 231, 232 Baltic countries, see Estonia; Latvia; Bismarck, Otto von, 23 Lithuania blockade, British naval, 64, 72, 163, 176, Baltic Germans, 24, 33, 165, 208
    [Show full text]