DOCSLIB.ORG

THE PROVINCIAL EDICT in EGYPT by RANON KATZOFF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE PROVINCIAL EDICT in EGYPT by RANON KATZOFF THE PROVINCIAL EDICT IN EGYPT by RANON KATZOFF(New York)* It is generally held that the governor of each province of the Roman empire issued an edict similar to that of the urban praetor and entitled edictum prouinciale 1). Because there are very few ancient references to this edict its existence was denied at the be- ginning of this century 2), but has been vigorously defended since then. The greatest certainty has been claimed for the existence of the edictum prouinciale in Egypt. Lenel considered the doctrine to be secured by the Egyptian material 3). Wenger says the papyri have placed the existence of the edict beyond all doubt 4). The absence of any citation of the edict in court in the papyri pre- served to us, raises the question of the correctness of the doctrine of the existence of the edictum prouinciale in Egypt. I believe that *) I wishto expressmy gratitudeto ProfessorA. Arthur Schiller,under whose directionthis study was made; and to ProfessorJoseph Modrzejewski,who read the manuscriptof this article,and offeredseveral valuable suggestions. 1) Paul Kruger, Geschichteder Quellenund Literatur des RömischenRechts, 2nd edition (Munichand Leipzig1912) 95; Otto Lenel,Das EdictumPerpetuum, 3rd edition(Leipzig 1927) (hereafter cited as LenelEP) 4 f.; OscarWilliam Rein- muth, ThePrefect of Egyptfrom Augustusto Diocletian,Klio Beiheft34, Neue Folge Heft 21 (Leipzig1935) 46 ff. ;H. F. Jolowicz,Historical Introduction to the Study of RomanLaw, 2nd edition (Cambridge1952) 368; LeopoldWenger, Die Quellendes rumischenRechts (Vienna 1953) 4 1 1Rafael ; Taubenschlag, The Law of Greco-RomanEgypt in the Light of the Papyri, 332 B.C.-640A.D., 2nd edition (Warsaw1955) (hereafter cited as Taubenschlag,Law) 33f.The fullestdiscussions of the generalproblems associated with the edictumprovinciale are Egon Weiss, Studienzu den rdmischenRechtsquellen (Leipzig 1914) 65-1 31 ;W. W. Buckland, L'EdictumProvinciale, RH 4th Ser. 13 (1934)81-96; and Gerard Chalon,L'idit de TiberiusJulius Alexander: Etude historique et exjgjtique(Olten and Lausanne 1964)72 ff. 2) Von Velsen,SZ 21 (1900)73. 3) Lenel,EP 4 n. 4. 4) Wenger(above, note 1) 411. 416 an examination of the evidence from Egypt tends to support the dissents of Arangio-Ruiz 5) and Modrzejewski 6). The case for the existence of the provincial edict in Egypt rests primarily on the evidence of three bilingual petitions of the third century for bonorum possessio. The first, SB 1010 (= P. Giss, inv. no. 40, ed. O. Eger, SZ 32 (1911) 378 ff. = Meyer, Jur. Pap. 27 = FIRA 3.61) is the petition addressed to the prefect Aurelius Appius Sabinus by M. Aurelius Chaeremon also known as Didymus, in 249, asking for possession of the estate of his deceased mother, Aurelia Hammonilla. The petitioner is a minor and is acting by the auctoritas of his guardian, who is none other than his father, M. Aurelius Chaeremon, also known as Zoilus. The petition itself is written in Latin and takes up the first eight lines of the papyrus. It is followed by the subscript of the petition- er in Greek, in which the object of the petition is again stated briefly (8-10). Then come the Greek date (11), the subscript of the prefect (12), the reference number of the petition by column and roll (12), and finally a Greek translation of the petition itself (13-end). The Greek translation is almost entirely lost, but was restored on the basis of the Latin text and the other papyri of the same type 7). By a remarkable coincidence we now have this translation on another papyrus, republished as SB 9298. What is of interest to us is the operative sentence of the petition where the petitioner asks for bonorum possessio ex ea parte edicti [legi]timis heredibus b(onorum) p(ossessionem) 5) FIRA III,, p. 183. In his L'applicationdu droit romainen Egypteaprjs la constitutionantoninienne, Bulletin de l'Institut d'Egypte 29 (1948)110, he refers to the edict mentionedin the petitionsdiscussed below as that of the praetor, not of the prefect.I havenot found a full expositionof his viewson this issue. 6) Joseph Modrzejewski,in a reviewof Chalon, above, note 1, in RH 4th Series43 (1965)98 f., deliversa brief but sharp attack on the commonlyaccepted view.Modrzejewski kindly showed me the fullerexposition of his view put forth in the course of his article Le rdglede droit dans l'Egypte romainescheduled to appear in Acts of the XIIth InternationalCongress of Papyrology,Ann Arbor, Michigan,1968 (New Haven and Toronto 1969).I am pleasedto note that the con- clusionsof his researchon this topic are generallythe sameas mine. In the FIRA text the openingsquare bracket is missingbefore at the beginningof line 18. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Book I. Title XXVII. Concerning the Office of the Praetor Prefect Of
    Book I. Title XXVII. Concerning the office of the Praetor Prefect of Africa and concerning the whole organization of that diocese. (De officio praefecti praetorio Africae et de omni eiusdem dioeceseos statu.) Headnote. Preliminary. For a better understanding of the following chapters in the Code, a brief outline of the organization of the Roman Empire may be given, but historical works will have to be consulted for greater details. The organization as contemplated in the Code was the one initiated by Diocletian and Constantine the Great in the latter part of the third and the beginning of the fourth century of the Christian era, and little need be said about the time previous to that. During the Republican period, Rome was governed mainly by two consuls, tow or more praetors (C. 1.39 and note), quaestors (financial officers and not to be confused with the imperial quaestor of the later period, mentioned at C. 1.30), aediles and a prefect of food supply. The provinces were governed by ex-consuls and ex- praetors sent to them by the Senate, and these governors, so sent, had their retinue of course. After the empire was established, the provinces were, for a time, divided into senatorial and imperial, the later consisting mainly of those in which an army was required. The senate continued to send out ex-consuls and ex-praetors, all called proconsuls, into the senatorial provinces. The proconsul was accompanied by a quaestor, who was a financial officer, and looked after the collection of the revenue, but who seems to have been largely subservient to the proconsul.
    [Show full text]
  • RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian's “Great
    ABSTRACT RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy. (Under the direction of Prof. S. Thomas Parker) In the year 303, the Roman Emperor Diocletian and the other members of the Tetrarchy launched a series of persecutions against Christians that is remembered as the most severe, widespread, and systematic persecution in the Church’s history. Around that time, the Tetrarchy also issued a rescript to the Pronconsul of Africa ordering similar persecutory actions against a religious group known as the Manichaeans. At first glance, the Tetrarchy’s actions appear to be the result of tensions between traditional classical paganism and religious groups that were not part of that system. However, when the status of Jewish populations in the Empire is examined, it becomes apparent that the Tetrarchy only persecuted Christians and Manichaeans. This thesis explores the relationship between the Tetrarchy and each of these three minority groups as it attempts to understand the Tetrarchy’s policies towards minority religions. In doing so, this thesis will discuss the relationship between the Roman state and minority religious groups in the era just before the Empire’s formal conversion to Christianity. It is only around certain moments in the various religions’ relationships with the state that the Tetrarchs order violence. Consequently, I argue that violence towards minority religions was a means by which the Roman state policed boundaries around its conceptions of Roman identity. © Copyright 2016 Carl Ross Rice All Rights Reserved Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy by Carl Ross Rice A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History Raleigh, North Carolina 2016 APPROVED BY: ______________________________ _______________________________ S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-2022 Prefect Board Introduced - - - Times
    Westminster School Simsbury, CT 06070 www.westminster-school.org Saturday, May 8, 2021 Vol. 110 No. 8 2021-2022 Prefect Board Introduced COMPILED BY ALEYNA BAKI ‘21, MATTHEW PARK ‘21 & HUDSON STEDMAN ‘21 CO-EDITORS-IN-CHIEF, 2020-2021 Head Prefect Junior Prefect Cooper Kistler is a boarder from Bella Tawney is a day student Tiburon, CA. He is a member of John Hay, from Simsbury, CT. She is a member of Black & Gold, First Boys’ Basketball, and John Hay, Black & Gold, the SAC Board, a Captain of First Boys’ lacrosse. As the new Captain of First Girls’ Basketball and First Head Prefect, Cooper aims to be the voice Girls’ Cross Country, as well as a Horizons of everyone in the community to cultivate a volunteer, the Co-President of AWARE, and culture of growth by celebrating the diver- a HOTH board member. In her final year sity of perspectives in the community. on the Hill, she is determined to create an In his own words: “I want to be the environment, where each and every member middleman between the Students and the of the school community feels accepted. Administration. I want to share the new In her own words: “The past year has perspective that we have all established dur- posed a number of difficulties, and it is ing the pandemic, and use it for the better. hard to adapt, but we should take this as an I want to UNITE the NEW school com- opportunity to teach our community and munity." continue to make it our Westminster." Priscilla Ameyaw is a Sung Min Cho is a Margot Douglass is a boarder from Ghana.
    [Show full text]
  • Tetrarch Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    TETRARCH PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Ian Irvine | 704 pages | 05 Feb 2004 | Little, Brown Book Group | 9781841491998 | English | London, United Kingdom Tetrarch PDF Book Chapter Master Aetheon of the 19th Chapter of the Ultramarines Legion was rumoured to be Guilliman's choice to take up the role of the newest Prince of Ultramar. Eleventh Captain of the Ultramarines Chapter. After linking up with the 8th Parachute Battalion in Bois de Bavent, they proceeded to assist with the British advance on Normandy, providing reconnaissance for the troops. Maxentius rival Caesar , 28 October ; Augustus , c. Year of the 6 Emperors Gordian dynasty — Illyrian emperors — Gallic emperors — Britannic emperors — Cookie Policy. Keep scrolling for more. Luke Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Cesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother In the summer of , Tetrarch got their first taste at extensive touring by doing a day east coast tour in support of the EP. D, Projector and Managing Editor. See idem. Galerius and Maxentius as Augusti of East and West. The four tetrarchs based themselves not at Rome but in other cities closer to the frontiers, mainly intended as headquarters for the defence of the empire against bordering rivals notably Sassanian Persia and barbarians mainly Germanic, and an unending sequence of nomadic or displaced tribes from the eastern steppes at the Rhine and Danube. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. Primarch of the Ultramarines Legion. The armor thickness was increased to a maximum of 16mm using riveted plating, and the Henry Meadows Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall' of Rome
    APOCALYPSE, TRANSFORMATION OR MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING? WESTERN SCHOLARSHIP AND THE ‘FALL’ OF ROME (1776-2008)1 Jeroen Wijnendaele In many ways the fifth century CE was one of the most remarkable centuries in European and Mediterranean History.2 An glance at a map of this region around 400 CE shows an empire stretching all the way from the Caucasus to the strait of Gibraltar and from the highlands in Scotland to the Red Sea. A Roman citizen living during the reign of Nero (54-68 CE) would still have recognised those borders as the same as those of his Empire. Yet looking further, around 500 CE, this empire has vanished in the West and been replaced by nearly a dozen barbarian kingdoms. The speed and magnitude of this geopolitical revolution is only comparable with twentieth century, when three empires that for centuries had dominated half of Europe were replaced with nearly twenty nation states. Despite its momentous impact on the shape of history, the fifth century has always been a bit of a black sheep in terms of scholarly attention. For most classicists it is too late, while for most medievalists too early. Furthermore, a lot of classicists feel hesitant to deal with this era. Only in the past few decades has there been a serious revaluation of this period. The old attitude is demonstrated by the original Cambridge Ancient History, the last volume of which stopped with the ascendancy of Constantine I in 324. In French, the period of the Later Roman Empire is usually called Le Bas-Empire—‘The Low Empire’.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing Roman Rule in Egypt: the Trilingual Stela of C
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Katja Lembke, Martina Minas-Nerpel, Stefan Pfeiffer (Hg.), Tradition and Transformation: Egypt under Roman Rule; proceedings of the International Conference, Hildesheim, Roemer- and Plizaeus-Museum, 3–6 July 2008, Leiden ; Boston 2010, S. 265-298 ESTABLISHING ROMAN RULE IN EGYPT: THE TRILINGUAL STELA OF C. CORNELIUS GALLUS FROM PHILAE Martina Minas-Nerpel Stefan Pfeiffer Introduction When Octavian departed Egypt in 30 BC, he placed C. Cornelius Gallus, an eques by rank, in charge of the new Roman province Aegyptus. Gallus, who was responsible to Octavian himself, received the newly created title of praefectus Alexandreae et Aegypti, Prefect of Alexandria and Egypt. Soon enough, not even three years after his appointment, Gallus incurred the emperor ’s utter displeasure. The prefect was dismissed by Augustus, returned to Rome, was convicted by the Senate and fore­ stalled the impending banishment by committing suicide in 26 BC, as we are informed by Cassius Dio. 1 Gallus ’ alleged hubris and his assumed damnatio memoriae have much been discussed among ancient historians, papyrologists, and Egyptologists. In this respect, the most important and crucial Egyptian document is a trilingual inscription —hieroglyphic Egyptian, Latin, and Greek—dated to 16 April 29 BC (Fig. 1-5). It was carved on a stela re-discovered in 1896 in front of Augustus ’ temple at Philae (Fig. 6),2 which the prefect Rubius Barbarus had dedicated in Augustus ’ year 18 (13/12 BC).3 Cut into two parts, the stela had been reused in the foun ­ dations, presumably of the temple ’s altar. The victory stela of pink Aswan granite, originally about 165 cm high, now 152 cm by 108 cm, is housed in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo (CG 9295).
    [Show full text]
  • ROMAN JURISTS and the CRISIS of the THIRD CENTURY A.D. in the ROMAN EMPIRE by LUKAS DE BLOIS
    ROMAN JURISTS AND THE CRISIS OF THE THIRD CENTURY A.D. IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE By LUKAS DE BLOIS In this paper I would like to discuss the following questions: did the crisis of the third century A.D. in the Roman Empire finish the strong position of jurists and juridically skilled bureaucrats at the Roman imperial court? Did this crisis usher in the end oftheir scholarly production? The period ofthe Severan dynasty, which preceded the Third Century crisis, has always been regarded as the great age of juridically trained administrators, when Rome's most noted jurists of all time, all of them equites. were appointed to important posts and dominated the imperial council. At least three of them, Papinian, Messius, and Ulpian, became praefecti praetorio'. Even though most of the praetorian prefects during the early third century were not lawyers, the influence of jurists was out of all proportion to their numbers and to the length of time during which they were praetorian prefects2• After about A.D. 240, however, original scholarly work of learned jurists almost vanished from the earth and military men took the lead in the imperial council and in other key positions. Why did this happen? Severan emperors regularly appointed two praetorian prefects, a military man next to a jurist or an administrator. This was just a matter of practical expediency, not a fixed system3• The jurists among the men they appointed belonged to a kind of learned group, within which the younger ones borrowed ideas from their predecessors and which produced books and treatises that have become classics' in Roman law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Background
    APPENDIX THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND All dates are B. C. I 06 Birth of Pompey and Cicero. 100 Sixth consulate of Marius. Birth of Julius Caesar. Ca. 100: publication of Meleager's Garland. ca. 97 Birth of Lucretius. 91-89 Social or Marsic War: Rome v. Italian Allies. 89-85 First Mithridatic War. 88 Sulla's march on Rome. Flight of Marius. 88-83 Sulla in the east. 86 Seventh consulate and death of Marius. Athens sacked by Sulla. Mithridates defeated. ca. 84 Birth of Catullus. 83-82 Civil War. 82-79 Dictatorship of Sulla. 73-71 Slave-revolt of Spartacus. Crushed by Crassus and Pompey. 70 First consulate of Pompey and Crassus. Birth of Virgil (Oct. 15) at Andes near Mantua. Ca. 70: arrival at Rome of the Callimachean Parthenius of Nicaea. ca. 69 Birth of Gallus. 67 Defeat of pirates by Pompey. 66 Lex Manilia confers on Pompey the command against Mithridates. 66-63 Pompey in the east. 65 Birth of Horace at Venusia. 63 Consulate of Cicero. Catilinarian conspiracy. Pompey's settlement of the east. Birth of Octavian, later Augustus (63 B.C.-A.D. 14). 60 Formation of first triumvirate: Caesar, Pompey, Crassus. 59 First consulate of Caesar. Birth of Livy at Padua. 58-49 Caesar in Gaul. 56 Conference at Luca: triumvirate renewed. 55 Second consulate of Pompey and Crassus. Ca. 55: birth of Tibullus. 54 Crassus sets out for Parthia. Death of Julia, Caesar's daughter and Pompey's wife. Ca. 54: deaths of Catullus and Lucretius; publication of De Rerum Natura. Birth of Livy.
    [Show full text]
  • Rome and the Cottians in the Western Alps Carolynn Roncaglia Santa Clara University, [email protected]
    Santa Clara University Scholar Commons Classics College of Arts & Sciences Fall 2013 Client prefects?: Rome and the Cottians in the Western Alps Carolynn Roncaglia Santa Clara University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.scu.edu/classics Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Carolynn Roncaglia. 2013. “Client prefects?: Rome and the Cottians in the Western Alps”. Phoenix 67 (3/4). Classical Association of Canada: 353–72. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7834/phoenix.67.3-4.0353. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classics by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLIENT PREFECTS?: ROME AND THE COTTIANS IN THE WESTERN ALPS Carolynn Roncaglia introduction When Augustus and the Romans conquered the central and western Alps at the end of the first century b.c.e., most of the newly subjugated regions were brought under direct Roman control. The central portion of the western Alps, however, was left in the hands of a native dynasty, the Cottians, where it remained until the reign of Nero over a half-century later. The Cottians thus serve as one of many examples of a form of indirect Roman rule, its “two-level monarchy,” wherein the rulers of smaller kingdoms governed as friends and allies of the Roman state in an asymmetrical power relationship with Rome.1 This article explores how a native dynasty like the Cottians presented and legitimized their relationship with Rome to a domestic audience.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beasts of Revelation Why Study Revelation 12?
    Class 3 The Great Red Dragon vs The Woman Part 2 The Beasts of Revelation Why Study Revelation 12? • It outlines dramatic, earth-quaking events of extreme importance in the divine plan, that would forever re-shape the course of history • It contains practical exhortation and warning for disciples living during those events and for disciples today • It explains how the “Man of Sin” of 2 Thess. 2 would be revealed • It is the source of false beliefs in Christendom The Dragon The Key Players The Woman The Man-Child The Great Red Dragon – Pagan Roman Empire • The Dragon shares many similar feature to that of Daniel’s 4th Beast (Symbolizing the Roman Empire) • The language is also used by both Peter & Paul to describe pagan Roman Empire – Compare Rev. 12:4,9,10 with 1 Pet. 5:8 & Eph. 6:8-9 • Dragon – Ezek. 29:3 – used initially of Egypt, later conquered by Roman Empire & used as symbol of R.E. • Serpent – Gen 3:15 – Pagan R.E. bruised Christ’s heel • Red = fiery – pagan generals carried fire ahead of them into battle as offering to the gods • 7 heads – location identified as Rome (Rev. 17:9-10) • Heads Crowned – (rather than 10 horns) Symbol of kingly or imperial dignity The Woman of Revelation 12 Woman: Representative of the Christian Community (both true & False) The Woman in Glory (12:1): • Clothed with the sun • Clothed with imperial favour • Moon under her feet • Pagan religious system under her subjection • Crown of 12 stars on head • Awarded political ascendancy and honour through her military achievements The Woman of Revelation 12 Rev 12:2,5 “And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered… “And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron…” • Christian community pregnant with iniquity (2 Cor.
    [Show full text]
  • Book I. Title XXVI. Concerning the Office of Praetorian Prefect of The
    Book I. Title XXVI. Concerning the office of Praetorian Prefect of the Orient and Illyria. (De officio praefectorum praetorio Orientis et Illyrici.) Headnote. This title purports to deal only with the praetorian prefects of Illyria and the Orient. These were the only prefects of the empire in the beginning of Justinian’s reign and prior to the time when the western Roman empire was re-conquered by him. Justinian then created the prefecture of Africa considered in the next title. That title is voluminous and deals with the officials under the praetorian prefect. Both titles alike, of course, relate to praetorian prefects in general, or the differences in the offices were, at least, not great. A detailed consideration of the subject is, accordingly, deferred till we come to the next title. 1.26.1. Emperor Alexander to Theodotus. A complaint filed with the praetorian prefect cannot be considered as having the effect of a joinder of issue. Given September 30 (230). Note. A supplication addressed to the emperor might have the effect of joinder of issue in a case. Headnote C. 1.19 and C. 1.20. But a petition addressed to the praetorian prefect had no such effect, and the instant rescript was written to point out this difference. 1.26.2. The same emperor to Restitutulus. If a rule made by the praetorian prefect is general, and not contrary to the law or constitutions, and no innovation has been subsequently made therein by my authority, it should be treated as valid. Given August 13 (235). Note. This shows that praetorian prefects had the right to make rules and regulations which were not in conflict with law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Tetrarchy and the Great Persecution
    The Second Tetrarchy and the Great Persecution Eutropius, Brevarium, 9.27-28 (Eutr. 9.27-28) 27. 1. But Herculius was undisguisedly cruel, and of a violent temper, and showed his severity of disposition in the sternness of his looks. 2. Gratifying his own inclination, he joined with Diocletian in even the most cruel of his proceedings. 3. But when Diocletian, as age bore heavily upon him, felt himself unable to sustain the government of the empire, he suggested to Herculius that they should both retire into private life, and commit the duty of upholding the state to more vigorous and youthful hands. 4. With this suggestion his colleague reluctantly complied. 5. Both of them, in the same day, exchanged the robe of empire for an ordinary dress, Diocletian at Nicomedia, Herculius at Milan, soon after a magnificent triumph which they celebrated at Rome over several nations, with a noble succession of pictures, and in which the wives, sisters, and children of Narseus were led before their chariots. 6. The one then retired to Salonae, and the other into Lucania. 28. 1. Diocletian lived to an old age in a private station, at a villa which is not far from Salonae, in honourable retirement, exercising extraordinary philosophy, inasmuch as he alone of all men, since the foundation of the Roman empire, voluntarily returned from so high a dignity to the condition of private life, and to an equality with the other citizens. 2. That happened to him, therefore, which had happened to no one since men were created, that, though he died in a private condition, he was enrolled among the gods.
    [Show full text]