DOCSLIB.ORG

Multi-County Hazard Analysis of South Central Kansas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Multi-County Hazard Analysis of South Central Kansas MULTI-COUNTY HAZARD ANALYSIS OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS Counties of Barber, Barton, Butler, Comanche, Cowley, Edwards, Harper, Harvey, Kiowa, Marion, McPherson, Pawnee, Reno, Rice, Sedgwick, Stafford, and Sumner PREPARED BY: DECEMBER 2011 SIGNATURE OF CONCURRENCE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS HAZARD ANALYSIS STUDY WILL BE EFFECTIVE UPON PRINTING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. Director, Barber County Emergency Mgmt Director, Barton County Emergency Mgmt Date: Date: Director, Butler County Emergency Mgmt Director, Comanche County Emergency Mgmt Date: Date: Director, Edwards County Emergency Mgmt Director, Harper County Emergency Mgmt Date: Date: Director, Harvey County Emergency Mgmt Director, Kiowa County Emergency Mgmt Date: Date: Director, Marion County Emergency Mgmt Director, McPherson County Emergency Mgmt Date: Date: Director, Pawnee County Emergency Mgmt Director, Pratt County Emergency Mgmt Date: Date: Director, Rice County Emergency Mgmt Director, Stafford County Emergency Mgmt Date: Date: Director, Sumner County Emergency Mgmt Date: TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE OF CONCURRENCE i TABLE OF CONTENTS ii INTRODUCTION VII 1 PURPOSE 1 2 FEDERAL GUIDANCE 1 3 OVERVIEW 13 3.1 EARLY TERRITORY HISTORY 13 3.2 EARLY COUNTY HISTORY 14 3.3 TOPOGRAPHY 18 3.4 CLIMATE 19 3.5 DEMOGRAPHICS 19 3.6 POPULATION 20 3.7 HOUSING 22 3.8 ECONOMY AND INDUSTRY 22 3.9 POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS 24 3.10 SPECIAL POPULATIONS 24 3.10.1 DISABILITY STATUS OF THE AGED 24 3.10.2 HOUSEHOLD TYPE OF THE AGED 25 4 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS 26 4.1 GEOLOGY 26 4.2 LAND USE 27 5 SALT DEPOSITS 27 6 RIVER BASINS 30 6.1 LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN 30 6.2 SMOKY HILL-SALINE RIVER BASIN 33 6.3 UPPER ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN 36 6.4 WALNUT RIVER BASIN 40 6.5 NEOSHO RIVER BASIN 44 6.6 EQUUS BEDS/GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT #2 47 7 TECHNOLOGICAL INCIDENT HISTORY 50 7.1 NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER (NRC) 50 7.2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (USDOT) 52 7.3 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD (NTSB) 53 7.4 TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI) 54 7.5 RADIOLOGICAL 54 7.6 METHAMPHETAMINE/CLANDESTINE LABS 54 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION 56 8 TRANSPORTATION 57 8.1 RAIL TRANSPORTATION 57 8.1.1 FREIGHT RAIL TRAFFIC DENSITIES 57 8.1.2 COMMUNITY IMPACTS 68 8.1.3 RAIL SAFETY 69 8.1.4 STRATEGIC RAIL CORRIDOR NETWORK (STRACNET) 70 8.1.5 PROPOSED CLASS I RAILROAD PROJECTS 71 8.1.6 PROJECTED CLASS I RAILROAD CONSTRAINTS 72 8.1.7 SHORT LINE RAILROAD INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS 74 8.2 AIR TRANSPORTATION 76 8.3 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION 79 8.3.1 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY HIGHWAY SYSTEM 79 8.3.2 CLASSIFICATIONS 79 8.3.3 BRIDGE RESTRICTIONS 80 9 TIER II REPORTING FACILITIES/RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN SITES 81 10 PIPELINE STATISTICS 82 11 OIL AND GAS FIELD STATISTICS 87 VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS 93 12 EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS 96 13 UTILITIES 98 13.1 ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 98 13.2 NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 104 13.3 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 105 14 SOCIAL VULNERABILITY INDEX 109 15 EXPOSURE OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT 112 16 SPATIAL HAZARD EVENTS AND LOSSES DATABASE FOR THE UNITED STATES (SHELDUS) 113 17 NATIONAL AND STATE REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES 115 18 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, SPECIES IN NEED OF CONSERVATION, AND CANDIDATE SPECIES 116 RISK ASSESSMENT 118 19 RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 119 20 DISASTER DECLARATION HISTORY 122 21 HAZARDS AND ASSESSMENTS 126 21.1 AGRICULTURAL INFESTATION 126 20.2 CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS (CAFO) 131 20.3 FLOODS 134 20.4 TORNADOES 137 20.5 STORMS (WINTER-SUMMER) 148 20.5.1 STORM CLASSIFICATIONS 148 20.5.2 STORM DAMAGE EVENTS 148 20.5.3 EXTREME TEMPERATURES 149 20.5.4 LIGHTNING 153 20.5.6 HAILSTORMS 159 20.5.7 SNOW & ICE STORMS 162 20.5.8 WINDSTORMS 166 20.6 DROUGHT 170 20.7 EARTHQUAKE 177 20.8 FOG 182 20.9 RADIOLOGICAL 183 20.9.1 Nuclear Weapon 183 20.9.2 Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) 184 20.9.3 Electromagnetic Radiation/Pulse (EMR/EMP) 184 20.9.4 Solar Radiation 184 20.10 FIRE/WILDFIRE 186 20.11 WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION 188 20.11.1 LOW EXPLOSIVES 188 20.11.2 HIGH EXPLOSIVES 188 20.11.3 TERTIARY EXPLOSIVES 188 20.12 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL 189 20.13 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 190 20.14 EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND RELEASES 193 20.15 DAMS AND LEVEES 195 20.15.1 DAMS 195 20.15.2 LEVEES 200 20.16 EMERGING PUBLIC HEALTH THREATS 202 20.17 UTILITIES 206 20.18 TRANSPORTATION ACCIDENTS 207 20.19 CIVIL DISTURBANCES 209 20.19.1 HATE GROUPS 209 20.19.2 ACTIVIST GROUPS 210 20.19.3 TERRORISM 211 20.20 EXPANSIVE SOILS AND SUBSIDENCE 219 20.21 ASTEROIDS AND METEORITES 221 SUMMARY 224 DEFINITIONS 229 INTRODUCTION 1 PURPOSE The purpose of a hazards analysis plan is to identify the potential hazards facing a community - whether they are natural, technological or national security related. The plan follows a three-step decision making process and is designed to consider all potential hazards within the planning district and to identify which hazards are of high priority and should be addressed in the emergency planning process. The three components or processes of the plan include: Hazards Identification – Typically provides specific information on situations that have the potential for causing injury to life or damage to property and the environment due to a hazardous materials spill or release. Vulnerability Analysis – Identifies areas in the community that may be affected or exposed, individuals in the community who may be subject to injury or death from certain specific hazardous materials, and what facilities, property, or environment may be susceptible to damage should a hazardous materials release occur. Risk Assessment – An assessment by the community of the likelihood (probability) of an accidental release of a hazardous material and the actual consequences that might occur based on the estimated vulnerable zones. The risk analysis is a judgment of probability and severity of consequences based on the history of previous incidents, local experience, and the best available current technological information. Preparation of this plan has been conducted under the planning guidance outlined in the National Response Team’s (NRT) 2001 Hazardous Materials Emergency Planning Guide (NRT-1), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Chemical Emergency Preparedness Program “Green Book” supplemental guidance entitled “Technical Guidance for Hazardous Analysis.” Until further notice, requests for information related to industry storage reporting, layouts and emergency operating plans covered under the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) Title III will be reviewed by the Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) on a case by case basis for determining applicability of K.S.A § 45-221(12) of the Kansas Open Records Act which states “Records of emergency or security information or procedures of a public agency, or plans, drawings, specifications or related information for any building or facility which is used for purposes requiring security measures in or around the building or facility or which is used for the generation or transmission of power, water, fuels or communications, if disclosure would jeopardize security of the public agency, building or facility.” 2 FEDERAL GUIDANCE NATIONAL RESPONSE FRAMEWORK (NRF) The National Response Framework (NRF) presents the guiding principles that enable all response partners to prepare for and provide a unified national response to disasters and emergencies. It establishes a comprehensive, national, all-hazards approach to domestic incident response. It is built upon scalable, flexible, and adaptable coordinating structures to align key roles and responsibilities across the Nation. It describes specific authorities and best practices for managing incidents that range from the serious but purely local, to large-scale terrorist attacks or catastrophic natural disasters. The National Response Framework defines the principles, roles, and structures that organize how we respond as a nation. The National Response Framework: describes how communities, tribes, states, the federal government, private-sectors, and nongovernmental partners work together to coordinate national response; describes specific authorities and best practices for managing incidents; and builds upon the National Incident Management System (NIMS), which provides a consistent template for managing incidents. The term “response” as used in NRF includes immediate actions to save lives, protect property and the environment, and meet basic human needs. Response also includes the execution of emergency plans and 1 actions to support short-term recovery. In each county, the Local Emergency Operations Plan (LEOP) applies the NRF principles that guide the response, roles and responsibilities, response actions, response organizations, and planning requirements to achieve an effective local and regional response to any incident that occurs. NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS) In Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-5, Management of Domestic Incidents, the President directed the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop, submit for review to the Homeland Security Council, and administer a National Incident Management System (NIMS). This system will provide a consistent nationwide approach for Federal, State, local, and tribal governments to work effectively and efficiently together to prepare for, prevent, respond to, and recover from domestic incidents, regardless of cause, size, or complexity. The NIMS enhances the management of domestic incidents by establishing a single, comprehensive system for incident management and will help achieve greater cooperation among Depart- ments and agencies
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spring 2014 2013-2014 KCDAA Board
    The Kansas Prosecutor The official publication of the Kansas County and District Attorneys Association Volume 11, No. 1, Spring 2014 2013-2014 KCDAA Board Barry Wilkerson Marc Goodman Marc Bennett President Vice President Secretary/Treasurer Riley County Attorney Lyon County Attorney Sedgwick County District Attorney Steve Howe Ellen Mitchell Douglas McNett Director I Director II Director III Johnson County District Attorney Saline County Attorney Pawnee County Assistant County Attorney Chairs & Representatives Justin Edwards CLE Committee Chair Assistant Sedgwick County District Attorney Marc Goodman Legislative Committee Chair Lyon County Attorney Chris Smith Mark Frame Jerome Gorman Director IV Past President NDAA Representative Cowley County Attorney Edwards County Attorney Wyandotte County District Attorney 2 The Kansas Prosecutor Spring 2014 The Kansas Prosecutor The official publication of the Kansas The Kansas Prosecutor County and District Attorneys Association The official publication of the Kansas County Published by the Kansas County and District and District Attorneys Association Attorneys Association, 1200 S.W. Tenth Avenue, Topeka, Kansas 66604. Phone: (785) 232-5822 Fax: (785) 234-2433 Volume 11, No. 1, Spring 2014 Table of Contents President’s Column: KCDAA Issues by Barry Wilkerson ............................................................................................. 4 Kansas Prosecutors Foundation Award and Golf Outing ............................. 5 Our mission: The purpose of the KCDAA is to promote, Legislator’s Column: From the KS House Corrections and improve and facilitate the administration Juvenile Justice Committee of justice in the state of Kansas. by Rep. John Rubin ............................................................................................. 7 For questions or comments about Guest Column: 2014 Public Safety Legislation: Advancing the Ball this publication, please contact the editor: by KS AG Derek Schmidt ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • May 25, 1965 M. A. COOK ETAL 3,185,017 METHOD of MAKING an EXPLOSIVE BOOSTER Original Filed July 13, 1959
    May 25, 1965 M. A. COOK ETAL 3,185,017 METHOD OF MAKING AN EXPLOSIVE BOOSTER Original Filed July 13, 1959 FLS-1 INVENTORS AE1M at OOC AOWGLMS Al ACA 3,185,017 United States Patent Office Patented May 25, 1965 2 3,185,017 pressed pentolite (PETN-TNT), TNT, tetryl, tetrytol METHOD OF MAKING AN EXPLGSWE GOSTER (tetryl-TNT), cyclotol (RDX-TNT), composition B Melvin A. Cook and Dotigias E. Pack, 3: it lake City, (RDX-TNT-wax) and Ednatol (EDNA-TNT). The Utah, assig Rors to Intertanozzataia Researcia and Engi more inexpensive of these explosives are not detonatable eering Company, Inc., Saitake City, Utah, a cospera by Prinnacord, however. tion of Utah 5 Original application July 13, 1959, Ser. No. 826,539, how It has been found that PETN, PETN-TNT mixtures, Patent No. 3,637,453, dated June 5, 1932, Cisie at: RDX and cyclotol are detonated by Primacord, but their this application Oct. 24, 1960, Ser. No. 70,334 high cost and the relatively large quantities required make 2 Clairls. (C. 86-) it uneconomical to use them as boosters. O The improved boost cr of the invention generally com This invention relates to detonating means for ex prises a core of Primacord-sensitive explosive material plosives and more particularly to boosters for relatively sit trol inted by a compacted sheath of Primacord-insensi insensitive explosive compositions. This application is tive explosive imaterial of high brisance, said booster a division of our copending application Serial No. 826,539, having at cast one perforation extending through said filed July 13, 1959, now U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Detonation Cord, Detacord, Det
    DDEPATMENT OF MINING ENGINEERING INTRODUCTION:- What are explosives? An explosive (or explosive material) is a reactive substance that contains a great amount of potential energy that can produce an explosion if released suddenly, usually accompanied by the production of light, heat, sound, and pressure. An explosive charge is a measured quantity of explosive material, which may either be composed solely of one ingredient or be a mixture containing at least two substances. The potential energy stored in an explosive material may, for example, be chemical energy, such as nitro glycerine or grain dust DDEPATMENT OF MINING ENGINEERING pressurized gas, such as a gas cylinder or aerosol can nuclear energy, such as in the fissile isotopes uranium-235 and plutonium-239 Explosive materials may be categorized by the speed at which they expand. Materials that detonate (the front of the chemical reaction moves faster through the material than the speed of sound) are said to be "high explosives" and materials that deflagrate are said to be "low explosives". Explosives may also be categorized by their sensitivity. Sensitive materials that can be initiated by a relatively small amount of heat or pressure are primary explosives and materials that are relatively insensitive are secondary or tertiary explosives. A wide variety of chemicals can explode; a smaller number are manufactured specifically for the purpose of being used as explosives. The remainder are too dangerous, sensitive, toxic, expensive, DDEPATMENT OF MINING ENGINEERING unstable, or prone to decomposition or degradation over short time spans. DDEPATMENT OF MINING ENGINEERING HISTORY:- The use of explosives in mining goes back to the year 1627, when gunpowder was first used in place of mechanical tools in the Hungarian (now Slovak) town of Banská Štiavnica.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Selection of Commercial Explosives Detection Systems For
    2.5.3.8 EXPRAY Field Test Kit EXPRAY is a unique, aerosol-based field test kit for the detection of what the manufacturer refers to as Group A explosives (TNT, DNT, picric acid, etc.), Group B explosives (Semtex H, RDX, PETN, NG, smokeless powder, etc.), and compounds that contain nitrates that are used in improvised explosives. Detection of explosive residue is made by observing a color change of the test paper. EXPRAY can be used in a variety of applications, and although in some aspects it does not perform as well as many of the other trace detectors discussed in this section, it costs only $250. This very low cost, coupled with simplicity and ease of use, may make it of interest to many law enforcement agencies (see the EXPRAY kit in fig. 13). The EXPRAY field kit2 is comprised of the following items: - one can of EXPRAY-1 for Group A explosives, - one can of EXPRAY-2 for Group B explosives, - one can of EXPRAY-3 for nitrate-based explosives (ANFO, black powder, and commercial and improvised explosives based on inorganic nitrates), - special test papers which prevent cross contamination. Figure 13. Photo of the EXPRAY Field Test Kit for explosives Initially, a suspected surface (of a package, a person’s clothing, etc.) is wiped with the special test paper. The paper is then sprayed with EXPRAY-1. The appearance of a dark violet-brown color indicates the presence of TNT, a blue-green color indicates the presence of DNT, and an orange color indicates the presence of other Group A explosives.
    [Show full text]
  • Explosive Characteristics and Performance Larry Mirabelli Design Factors for Chemical Crushing
    Explosive Characteristics and Performance Larry Mirabelli Design Factors for Chemical Crushing Controllable EXPLOSIVEEXPLOSIVE Uncontrollable GEOLOGYROCK CONFINEMENT DISTRIBUTION Course Agenda What is an Explosive Explosive Types What are best to fuel “chemical crusher” Explosive Properties Explosive types Characteristics General Application Explosive selection to meet blasting objectives What is an Explosive Intimate mixture of fuel and oxidizer. Can be a molecular solid, liquid or gas and/or mixtures of them. When initiated reacts very quickly to form heat, solids and gas. Violent exothermic oxidation-reduction reaction. Detonates instead of burning. Rate of reaction is its detonation velocity. Explosive Types Main Explosive Charge Explosive for use in primer make up. Initiation System Explosive Types – Main Explosive Charge Bulk Explosive Blasting Agent, 1.5 D (not detonator sensitive) • Repumpable – Emulsion (available with field density adjustment and/or homogenization) • Repumpable ANFO Blend – Emulsion (available with field density adjustment) • Heavy ANFO Blend – Emulsion • ANFO For fueling chemical crusher, application flexibility for changing design is best decision. Explosive Types – Main Explosive Charge Packaged Explosive Explosive, 1.1D (detonator sensitive) • Emulsion • Dynamite Blasting Agent, 1.5 D (not detonator sensitive) • Emulsion • Water Gel • WR ANFO • ANFO For fueling chemical crusher, it is best to optimize explosive distribution. Explosive Types Explosive for use in primer make up. Explosive, 1.1D (detonator sensitive) • Cast Booster • Dynamite • Emulsion For fueling chemical crusher, cast booster is recommended explosive for primer make up. Explosive Types Initiation System Electronic Non Electric Electric For fueling chemical crusher, Electronic Detonator is recommended. Explosive Properties Safety properties Characterize transportation, storage, handling and use Physical properties Characterize useable applications and loading equipment requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Render-Safe Impact Dynamics of the M557 Fuze G.A. Gazonas U.S. Army
    Transactions on the Built Environment vol 32, © 1998 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 Render-safe impact dynamics of the M557 fuze G.A. Gazonas U.S. Army Research Laboratory Weapons and Materials Research Directorate Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA e-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper outlines the results of a combined experimental and computational study which investigates the transient structural response of the M557 point detonating fuze subjected to low-speed (200 m/s) oblique impact by a hardened steel projectile. The problem is of interest to the explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) community as it is a method that is currently used to "render-safe" ordnance and other explosive devices found in the field [1]. An inert M557 fuze is instrumented with a low mass (1.5 gram), 60 kilo-g uniaxial accelerometer and subjected to oblique impact by launching a 300 gram projectile from a 4-in airgun. The transient structural response of the fuze is compared to the predicted response using the Lagrangian finite element code DYNA3D. Peak accelerations measured in two tests average 35 kilo-g whereas DYNA3D predicts a 40 to 50 kilo-g peak acceleration depending upon the amount of prescribed damping. Both measured and computed acceleration histories are Fourier transformed and the estimated spectral response at the base of the fuze is shown to be dependent upon the failure strength of the flash tube. 1 Introduction The explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) community utilizes a variety of devices to disarm or "render-safe" ordnance and other explosive devices found in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Mining
    Surface Mining Products, Services and Reference Guide Contents n Services 4 n Bulk Explosives 5 n Packaged Explosives 21 n Initiation Systems 29 n Blasting Accessories 45 n Explosive Delivery Systems 47 n Reference 49 Why do companies come to Dyno Nobel for groundbreaking solutions? Dyno Nobel is a global leader in commercial explosives and blast design. One of our core strengths is our understanding of the processes and challenges that impact on the mining industry. We leverage our decades of industry experience to meet and exceed customer expectations. We can draw upon our global resources to provide our customers with fully tailored solutions that can make a positive difference to your project. Our team work with mining companies to solve highly complex problems and they can help you too. Dyno Nobel has the people, the resources and the experience to deliver Groundbreaking Performance®. Dyno Nobel is a business of Incitec Pivot Limited (IPL), an S&P/ASX Top 50 company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX). Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific provides a full range of industrial explosives, related products and services to customers in Australia, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Turkey, Latin America, the United States and Canada. Services Consulting services Tailored training courses DynoConsult®, the specialist consulting division of Dyno Nobel backs up its innovative product offering with Dyno Nobel, aims to improve customer performance. world class support for our customers. Its resources include a team of experienced professionals To reinforce safe practices and upskill technical with local and international experience in open cut proficiency, Dyno Nobel offers a full range of training mining processes.
    [Show full text]
  • IMEMTS 2006 Booster Explosives Paper
    EXPLOSIVE BOOSTER SELECTION CRITERIA FOR INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS APPLICATIONS Ron Hollands BAE SYSTEMS RO Defence, Glascoed, Usk, Monmouthshire, NP15 1XL, UK. Tel: +44-(0)1291-674181; Fax: +44-(0)1291-674103; E-mail: [email protected] Peter Barnes, Ron Moss and Mike Sharp Defence Ordnance Safety Group, MOD Abbey Wood, Bristol, BS34 8JH, UK. Introduction Boosters play an essential role in the safe functioning of the majority of explosive-filled ordnance by propagating and magnifying the detonation wave from initiator to main charge. Booster explosives formulated for Insensitive Munitions (IMs) applications must fulfil a number of exacting and often apparently conflicting requirements. For example, the booster must be shock sensitive enough to reliably take over from the detonator and at the same time must possess reduced vulnerability towards hazardous stimuli as represented by the threats described in STANAG 4439. Consistent performance and survivability under in-service conditions must also be maintained throughout the lifecycle of the munition. This necessitates preservation of physical integrity, thermal stability and resistance to ageing, particularly if the explosive is to be subjected to high–g environments during launch or retardation. Selection Criteria This paper describes the rationale and methodology adopted in the United Kingdom for the assessment and selection of candidate pressable booster formulations as part of a systems approach to meeting IM requirements. The Insensitive Munitions Assessment Panel (IMAP) reviews available data on design features, such as boosters, beginning at an early stage in a project’s life. These reviews are undertaken to assess the IM compatibility of proposed design options and choices of energetic materials with a view to defining the IM signature for the munition.
    [Show full text]
  • FM 5-250: Explosives and Demolitions
    FM 5-250 HEADQUARTERS Field Manual DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 5-250 Washington, DC, 15 June 1992 i FM 5-250 ii FM 5-250 iii FM 5-250 iv FM 5-250 v FM 5-250 vi FM 5-250 vii FM 5-250 viii FM 5-250 ix FM 5-250 x FM 5-250 xi FM 5-250 xii FM 5-250 xiii FM 5-250 xiv FM 5-250 xv FM 5-250 xvi FM 5-250 xvii FM 5-250 xviii FM 5-250 xix FM 5-250 xx FM 5-250 xxii FM 5-250 xxi FM 5-250 xxiv FM 5-250 xxiii FM 5-250 xxv FM 5-250 xxvi FM 5-250 xxvii FM 5-250 Preface The purpose of this manual is to provide technical information on explosives used by United States military forces and their most frequent applications. This manual does not discuss all applications but presents the most current information on demolition procedures used in most situations. If used properly, explosives serve as a combat multiplier to deny maneuverability to the enemy. Focusing mainly on these countermobility operations, this manual provides a basic theory of explosives, their characteristics and common uses, formulas for calculating various types of charges, and standard methods of priming and placing these charges. When faced with unusual situations, the responsible engineer must either adapt one of the recommended demolition methods or design the demolition from basic principles presented in this and other manuals. The officer in charge must maintain ultimate responsibility for the demolition design, ensuring the safe and efficient application of explosives.
    [Show full text]
  • R1-B.1: Metrics for Explosivity, Inerting & Compatibility
    Appendix A: Project Reports ALERT Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives Phase 2 Year 4 Annual Report Project R1-B.1 R1-B.1: Metrics for Explosivity, Inerting & Compatibility I. PARTICIPANTS Faculty/Staff Name Title Institution Email Jimmie Oxley Co-PI URI [email protected] Jim Smith Co-PI URI [email protected] Graduate, Undergraduate and REU Students Name Degree Pursued Institution Month/Year of Graduation Ryan Rettinger PhD URI 5/2018 Matt Porter PhD URI 5/2017 Tailor Busbee PhD URI 5/2020 Kevin Colizza PhD URI 5/2018 Devon Swanson PhD URI 5/2017 Alex Yeudakemau PhD URI 12/2020 Maxwell Yekel BS URI 8/2017 Rachael Lenher BS URI 5/2021 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Project Overview The goal of this project is to narrow the range of potential explosives threats that concern the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE). For example, not every oxidizer/fuel (FOX) mixture is a potential explosive. This project is aimed at determining which are and assessing at what point threat mixtures have been successfully “inerted.” Because the number of potential threats is large and highly diverse, it is essential that a quick, safe method of determining detonability be established—a method not requiring the formulation of large amounts of material to determine if it is an explosive hazard. We have taken multiple approaches to this problem, including: • Approach 1: Using homemade explosives (HMEs) that are FOX mixtures. We have characterized their responses to small-scale tests and are in the process of seeking a correlation to modest-scale detonation testing; • Approach 2: Applying fundamental tandem mass spectrometric (MS) techniques to discover possible • Approach 3: Developing a new way to characterize the shock/detonation front using unique probes to aid relationships between collision-induced fragmentation energies and specific properties of explosives; in the examination of the growth to detonation vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Detonation Modeling of Corner-Turning Shocks in PBXN-111
    15th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia 13-17 December 2004 DETONATION MODELLING OF CORNER-TURNING SHOCKS IN PBXN-111 J.P. Lu1, F.C. Christo1 and D.L. Kennedy2 1Weapons Systems Division Defence Science and Technology Organisation P O Box 1500, Edinburgh, SA 5111 AUSTRALIA 2Orica Explosives, George Booth Drive PO Box 196, Kurri Kurri, NSW Abstract Due to geometrical symmetry an axisymmetric computational An explicit finite element hydrocode, LS-DYNA, was used to model was constructed. The boosters were modelled with the model corner-turning shocks of a highly non-ideal PBXW-115 programmed burn model and JWL equation of state. The explosive. Unlike our previous work where the CPeX combustion acceptors were modelled with the Ignition and Growth Reactive model was used, this study has focused on the Ignition and Model, and the brass tube was modelled with the plastic- Growth Reactive Model, which has been calibrated against kinematic material model. experimental results. It was found that the Ignition and Growth Reactive Model performs as well as the CPeX model in predicting shock evolution around corners, yet both models were Pentolite initiator unable to accurately model the configuration of the brass cylindrical confined explosive booster. charge Introduction 16.9mm Cylindrical thick Brass booster casing PBXW-115 explosive has been tailored and fully qualified as an charge underwater explosive. Known also as PBXN-111 in the US, and 50.8mm PBXW-115(Aust), it is composed of 43% ammonium perchlorate diameter, Spherical explosive (AP), 25% aluminium (Al), 20% RDX and 12% HTPB binder. 152.5mm in length charge bowl Modelling this highly non-ideal explosive is a challenging task.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Crime Summit July 17, 1992
    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu Briefing Book KANSAS CRIME SUMMIT JULY 17, 1992 Kansas Expo Center Shawnee Room Topeka, Kansas Bob Dole United States Senator Kansas Prepared by the United States Attorney's Office District of Kansas Page 1 of 35 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu SENATOR BOB DOLE OPENING STATEMENT KANSAS CRIME SUMMIT JULY 17, 1992 THANK YOU. IT'S A PLEASURE TO WELCOME YOU TO THE KANSAS CRIME SUMMIT. LET ME EXTEND MY THANKS TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND TO JUDGE SESSIONS FOR 1 Page 2 of 35 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu ACCEPTING MY INVITATION TO COME TO TOPEKA AND TO MEET WITH THE KANSAS LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNITY AND WITH CITIZENS CONCERNED ABOUT CRIME. AS A SENATOR, I RECEIVE HUNDREDS OF LETTERS A DAY ON A WIDE VARIETY OF ISSUES. AND I WOULD BET THAT DURING 2 Page 3 of 35 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu MY YEARS IN THE SENATE, NOT A DAY HAS PASSED WHEN I DIDN'T RECEIVE A LETTER FROM ....... SOMEONE WHO WAS CONCERNED ABOUT CRIME. AND THE SAD FACT IS THAT THERE IS GOOD REASON TO-- BE CONCERNED. RECENT STATISTICS HAVE CONFIRMED WHAT MANY OF US HAVE 3 Page 4 of 35 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu SUSPECTED FOR A LONG TIME-- ~NSAS 1§ NOT IMMUNl;..!O THE CRIME EPIDEMIC SWEEPING AMERICA.
    [Show full text]