DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Highlights Report for Queensland's Discrete Indigenous

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Indigenous Communities 2010/11 Communities Indigenous Discrete Queensland’s for Report Highlights Annual Annual Highlights Report for Queensland’s Discrete Indigenous Communities July 2010 – June 2011 Incorporating the Quarterly report on key indicators in Queensland’s discrete Indigenous communities for April – June 2011 2864_DEC2011 While every effort has been made to respect cultural traditions, readers are advised the publication may contain images of people who are deceased. The Department of Communities has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that information contained in this document is accurate including histories, traditional names and pronunciations. Contents Message from the Minister ii Executive Summary iv Overview and General Trends 1 Summary of Quarterly Findings 26 Aurukun 27 Cherbourg 38 Coen 47 Doomadgee 55 Hope Vale 66 Kowanyama 78 Lockhart River 88 Mapoon 97 Mornington Island 106 Mossman Gorge 117 Napranum 125 Northern Peninsula Area 134 Palm Island 145 Pormpuraaw 155 Woorabinda 164 Wujal Wujal 174 Yarrabah 183 Snapshot of Indigenous Policy Initiatives 193 Alcohol Carriage Limits Notes to Accompany Data (Technical Notes) Contacts and Feedback i Message from the Minister This second Annual Highlights Report for Queensland’s Discrete Indigenous Communities July 2010 – June 2011, Incorporating the Quarterly report on key indicators in Queensland’s discrete Indigenous communities for April – June 2011 builds on the Bligh Government’s commitment to transparency and accountability in closing the gap in life outcomes between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Queenslanders and non-Indigenous Queenslanders. It also affi rms the Government’s commitment to working in partnership with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders, communities and individuals to bring about meaningful and practical change. The focus is on the everyday things that matter and make a lasting difference in everyone’s lives — good health, an education, a job, appropriate housing and infrastructure, safe and secure environments, children attending and achieving at school, economic and business opportunities, effective services and supports, and real hope and belief in opportunities for the future. The fi rst Annual Highlights Report was published in December 2010 with overall analyses showing decreasing rates of harm over time in several of the discrete Indigenous communities for hospital admissions for assault-related conditions and reported offences against the person. Annual comparisons also indicated positive changes in other areas of community wellbeing, with school attendance improving or stabilising and breaches of alcohol restrictions decreasing or remaining steady in many communities. This second Annual Highlights Report provides further evidence of this positive change, supported by the commencement of alcohol restrictions from December 2002 and the implementation of key initiatives such as the Cape York Welfare Reform Trial and the Remote Indigenous Land and Infrastructure Program Offi ce. This Report builds on the detailed trend analysis provided in the fi rst Annual Highlights Report, showing progress in key indicators of harm and wellbeing over time as well as providing annual and quarterly data. The result is that in many communities, 2010/11 annual rates of hospital admissions for assault-related conditions and rates of reported offences against the person are similar to those reported in 2009/10. Signifi cant decreases in annual rates of offences against the person from 2009/10 to 2010/11 were also reported for some communities. Over the longer term, decreasing trends in hospital admissions for assault- related conditions and reported offences against the person were evident in a number of communities, with two communities showing evidence of decreasing trends in both of these indicators. Rates of charges resulting in convictions for breaches of alcohol restrictions decreased in many communities over the last two years with six of the nine communities which reported signifi cant increases in their rate of charges resulting in a conviction between 2007/08 and 2008/09 experiencing signifi cant decreases between 2009/10 and 2010/11. ii Annual Highlights Report for Queensland’s Discrete Indigenous Communities July 2010 – June 2011 Furthermore, in 2010/11, an additional four communities reported rates of charges resulting in a conviction which were signifi cantly lower than their 2009/10 rates. Student attendance rates in Semester 1 2011 show variable outcomes when compared with the previous year, with increases observed in four communities and decreases observed in another four communities. Over the longer term, Semester 1 student attendance rates have improved in two communities and have been maintained in most others. Despite these solid results, many discrete Indigenous communities have levels of harm much higher than the State rate, requiring an ongoing commitment to investment and action on the part of all partners to bring about reall change. While unquestionably change is afoot, this effort needs to bee embedded to bring about long-term sustainable outcomes for Indigenous Queenslanders. This Report does recognise the change that is occurring and is full of good news stories which are highlighted in the Government Champions’ reports for each community. These reports show the excellent work that is being achieved on the ground to drive change and growth in communities. Cherbourg and Napranum, for example, recently achieved success in the 2011 Queensland Reconciliation Awards. The Cherbourg Historical Precinct Group Inc was awarded the Premier’s Reconciliation Award for the Ration Shed Museum, which offers tours and educational programs for visitors to the community. The Napranum Parents and Learning Group was awarded a Reconciliation Award in the Community Organisation category for theireiirr signifi cant work with parents and families in developing and buildingding vital literacy and numeracy skills. Like much of Queensland, a number of Indigenous communities were affected by the natural disasters in late 2010 and early 2011. The way communities banded together to support each other and recover was inspiring, and shows again the results that can be achieved by working in partnership. I look forward to continuing to do so with all Indigenous Queenslanders to make a lasting difference in their lives and communities. Curtis Pitt MP Minister for Disability Services, Mental Health and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships Member for Mulgrave iii Incorporating the Quarterly report on key indicators in Queensland’s discrete Indigenous communities for April – June 2011 Executive Summary The Annual Highlights Report for Queensland’s Doomadgee which experienced an increase in its Discrete Indigenous Communities July 2010 – admission rate from 2009/10 to 2010/11, and June 2011, Incorporating the Quarterly report on • the communities of Aurukun, Cherbourg, Coen, key indicators in Queensland’s discrete Indigenous Doomadgee, Hope Vale, Mapoon, Mornington communities for April – June 2011 (Annual Highlights Island, Mossman Gorge, Napranum, Palm Island, Report) provides: Pormpuraaw, Woorabinda, Wujal Wujal and Yarrabah • the second examination of longer term trends show annual rates of reported offences against the from 2002/03 person similar to those reported in 2009/10. • statistical information on annual and quarterly In contrast, Kowanyama, Lockhart River and the fi ndings Northern Peninsula Area experienced signifi cant • information on the operation of the Remote decreases in annual rates of reported offences Indigenous Land and Infrastructure Program against the person from 2009/10 to 2010/11. Offi ce for the six month period 1 January 2011 Over the reporting period 2002/03 to 2010/11, to 30 June 2011 decreasing trends in hospital admissions for • Government Champions’ reports on achievements assault-related conditions were evident in Coen, in each of the communities, and Kowanyama, Lockhart River, Mapoon, Pormpuraaw, • brief descriptions of major Indigenous policy Wujal Wujal and Yarrabah (from 2004/05). Similarly, initiatives currently underway. decreasing trends in reported offences against the Since the commencement of alcohol restrictions in person were evident in Aurukun, Doomadgee, Hope Queensland’s discrete Indigenous communities (from Vale, Kowanyama, Napranum and Pormpuraaw. In December 2002), there have been improvements in most communities, these trends are a continuation of many communities. In addition, the Cape York previously reported trends. Only two communities, Welfare Reform Trial which commenced in July 2008 Kowanyama and Pormpuraaw, show evidence of (in Aurukun, Coen, Hope Vale and Mossman Gorge) decreasing trends in both hospital admissions and shows that Coen and Mossman Gorge have relatively reported offences. high levels of school attendance and Aurukun has Many discrete communities have levels of offending experienced an improvement. While levels of harm at rates much higher than the State rate and some show no consistent patterns of change over the four show no sign of decreasing over time: communities, rates of child safety substantiated • Cherbourg, the last community to have alcohol notifi cations of harm and child protection orders in restrictions applied, has persistently high levels of the communities of Aurukun, Coen and Hope Vale offending. In 2010/11, the annual rate of reported remain much higher than the State rates. offences against the person was 70.6 per 1,000 In most communities,
Recommended publications
  • Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward?

    Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward?

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ResearchOnline at James Cook University Final Report Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? Allan Dale, Melissa George, Rosemary Hill and Duane Fraser Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? Allan Dale1, Melissa George2, Rosemary Hill3 and Duane Fraser 1The Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Cairns 2NAILSMA, Darwin 3CSIRO, Cairns Supported by the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme Project 3.9: Indigenous capacity building and increased participation in management of Queensland sea country © CSIRO, 2016 Creative Commons Attribution Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? is licensed by CSIRO for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: 978-1-925088-91-5 This report should be cited as: Dale, A., George, M., Hill, R. and Fraser, D. (2016) Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward?. Report to the National Environmental Science Programme. Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns (50pp.). Published by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre on behalf of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme (NESP) Tropical Water Quality (TWQ) Hub. The Tropical Water Quality Hub is part of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme and is administered by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited (RRRC).
  • Many Voices Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Languages Action Plan

    Many Voices Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Languages Action Plan

    Yetimarala Yidinji Yi rawarka lba Yima Yawa n Yir bina ach Wik-Keyangan Wik- Yiron Yam Wik Pa Me'nh W t ga pom inda rnn k Om rungu Wik Adinda Wik Elk Win ala r Wi ay Wa en Wik da ji Y har rrgam Epa Wir an at Wa angkumara Wapabura Wik i W al Ng arra W Iya ulg Y ik nam nh ar nu W a Wa haayorre Thaynakwit Wi uk ke arr thiggi T h Tjung k M ab ay luw eppa und un a h Wa g T N ji To g W ak a lan tta dornd rre ka ul Y kk ibe ta Pi orin s S n i W u a Tar Pit anh Mu Nga tra W u g W riya n Mpalitj lgu Moon dja it ik li in ka Pir ondja djan n N Cre N W al ak nd Mo Mpa un ol ga u g W ga iyan andandanji Margany M litja uk e T th th Ya u an M lgu M ayi-K nh ul ur a a ig yk ka nda ulan M N ru n th dj O ha Ma Kunjen Kutha M ul ya b i a gi it rra haypan nt Kuu ayi gu w u W y i M ba ku-T k Tha -Ku M ay l U a wa d an Ku ayo tu ul g m j a oo M angan rre na ur i O p ad y k u a-Dy K M id y i l N ita m Kuk uu a ji k la W u M a nh Kaantju K ku yi M an U yi k i M i a abi K Y -Th u g r n u in al Y abi a u a n a a a n g w gu Kal K k g n d a u in a Ku owair Jirandali aw u u ka d h N M ai a a Jar K u rt n P i W n r r ngg aw n i M i a i M ca i Ja aw gk M rr j M g h da a a u iy d ia n n Ya r yi n a a m u ga Ja K i L -Y u g a b N ra l Girramay G al a a n P N ri a u ga iaba ithab a m l j it e g Ja iri G al w i a t in M i ay Giy L a M li a r M u j G a a la a P o K d ar Go g m M h n ng e a y it d m n ka m np w a i- u t n u i u u u Y ra a r r r l Y L a o iw m I a a G a a p l u i G ull u r a d e a a tch b K d i g b M g w u b a M N n rr y B thim Ayabadhu i l il M M u i a a
  • Cape York Peninsula Parks and Reserves Visitor Guide

    Cape York Peninsula Parks and Reserves Visitor Guide

    Parks and reserves Visitor guide Featuring Annan River (Yuku Baja-Muliku) National Park and Resources Reserve Black Mountain National Park Cape Melville National Park Endeavour River National Park Kutini-Payamu (Iron Range) National Park (CYPAL) Heathlands Resources Reserve Jardine River National Park Keatings Lagoon Conservation Park Mount Cook National Park Oyala Thumotang National Park (CYPAL) Rinyirru (Lakefield) National Park (CYPAL) Great state. Great opportunity. Cape York Peninsula parks and reserves Thursday Possession Island National Park Island Pajinka Bamaga Jardine River Resources Reserve Denham Group National Park Jardine River Eliot Creek Jardine River National Park Eliot Falls Heathlands Resources Reserve Captain Billy Landing Raine Island National Park (Scientific) Saunders Islands Legend National Park National park Sir Charles Hardy Group National Park Mapoon Resources reserve Piper Islands National Park (CYPAL) Wen Olive River loc Conservation park k River Wuthara Island National Park (CYPAL) Kutini-Payamu Mitirinchi Island National Park (CYPAL) Water Moreton (Iron Range) Telegraph Station National Park Chilli Beach Waterway Mission River Weipa (CYPAL) Ma’alpiku Island National Park (CYPAL) Napranum Sealed road Lockhart Lockhart River Unsealed road Scale 0 50 100 km Aurukun Archer River Oyala Thumotang Sandbanks National Park Roadhouse National Park (CYPAL) A r ch KULLA (McIlwraith Range) National Park (CYPAL) er River C o e KULLA (McIlwraith Range) Resources Reserve n River Claremont Isles National Park Coen Marpa
  • LAADE W01 Sound Recordings Collected by Wolfgang Laade, 1963

    LAADE W01 Sound Recordings Collected by Wolfgang Laade, 1963

    Interim Finding aid LAADE_W01 Sound recordings collected by Wolfgang Laade, 1963-1965 Prepared February 2013 by MH Last updated 23 December 2016 ACCESS Availability of copies Listening copies are available. Contact the AIATSIS Audiovisual Access Unit by completing an online enquiry form or phone (02) 6261 4212 to arrange an appointment to listen to the recordings or to order copies. Restrictions on listening Some materials in this collection are restricted and may only be listened to by clients who have obtained permission from AIATSIS as well as the relevant Indigenous individual, family or community. For more details, contact Access and Client Services by sending an email to [email protected] or phone (02) 6261 4212. Restrictions on use This collection is partially restricted. It contains some materials which may only be copied by clients who have obtained permission from AIATSIS as well as the relevant Indigenous individual, family or community. For more details, contact Access and Client Services by sending an email to [email protected] or phone (02) 6261 4212. Permission must be sought from AIATSIS as well as the relevant Indigenous individual, family or community for any publication or quotation of this material. Any publication or quotation must be consistent with the Copyright Act (1968). SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE Date: 1963-1965 Extent: 82 sound tape reels (ca. 34 hrs. 30 min.) : analogue, 3 3/4 ips, 2 track, mono. ; 7 in. (not held). Production history These recordings were collected by Dr Wolfgang Laade of the Freie Universität, West Berlin, between 1963 and 1965 at various locations on Cape York Peninsula and the Torres Strait Islands, Queensland, Australia.
  • Publisher Version (Open Access)

    Publisher Version (Open Access)

    EUROCENTRIC VALUES AT PLAY MODDING THE COLONIAL FROM THE INDIGENOUS PERSPECTIVE RHETT LOBAN AND THOMAS APPERLEY Indigenous people and cultures are rarely included in digital games, and if they are it is often in a rather thoughtless manner. The indigenous peoples and cultures of many parts of the world have been portrayed in digital games in several ways that show little respect or understanding of the important issues these populations face. For example, in the Australian-made Ty the Tasmanian Tiger (Electronic Arts, 2002), Australian Aboriginal people are completely absent, replaced by anthropomorphized indigenous animals some of whom wear traditional face paint, while the plot involves rescuing other animals from the “dreamtime.” So while a secularized white settler version of Aboriginal culture is a core part of the game, the people are absent. The controversial mobile game Survival Island 3: Australia Story (NIL Entertainment, 2015), was removed from the Google Play and Apple stores in January 2016, largely because of an online petition that was concerned the game encouraged violence against indigenous Australians. The game portrayed Aboriginal people as “savages” who contributed to the difficulty of surviving in the Australian outback. Other games have appropriated indigenous iconography and culture, like Mark of Kri (Sony Computer Entertainment, 2002) which used traditional Māori (the indigenous people of Aotearoa/New Zealand) facial tattoo or Tā moko on characters in the game. These examples are disappointing, and seem to represent a common 1 occurrence in commercial non-indigenous media. However, there have also recently been a number of critically acclaimed commercial gaming projects which deal with indigenous culture and issues from an indigenous perspective, for example the game Never Alone/Kisima Inŋitchuŋa (E-Line Media, 2014), made by Upper One Games in partnership with 2 Alaska’s Cook Inlet Tribal Council.
  • Community Engagement Guidelines Coen

    Community Engagement Guidelines Coen

    COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT GUIDELINES COEN The Commission would like to thank the Local Commissioners for providing advice and guidance into the development of this document in regard to their specific communities. The Commission also wishes to acknowledge receiving information and support to produce this document from partner Queensland and Australian Government agencies and departments. Page 2 The Commission recognises we are visitors to the country we travel across and work in and that many of our Local Commissioners are Traditional Owners and Elders of their communities. The Commission acknowledges and pays our respects to the Traditional Owners, Elders and Teachers of these lands. To those of the past whose unseen hands guide the actions and decisions of the Commissioners today; to those of the present working for their communities and setting an example for the next generation and to those of the future, the Elders not yet born who will inherit the legacy of our efforts. Page 3 COMMUNITY PROTOCOLS Prior to visiting Coen it is important that one has some knowledge of its history along with an overview of how to engage with members of the Aboriginal community. The need for protocols is not solely an Indigenous or Aboriginal issue. Community protocols establish modes of behaviour and communication which demonstrate respect for individual residents and the diversity of other cultures. The Australian Aboriginal culture differs significantly from the Australian non- Aboriginal culture. It is therefore essential to understand the relevant cultural disparities and protocols in order to gain respect and effectively engage with the Aboriginal community. The appreciation of cultural morays including understanding the position and status of people within the local Aboriginal community assists in successfully engaging with Indigenous peoples.
  • Clinician Engagement Strategy 2019-2021

    Clinician Engagement Strategy 2019-2021

    Clinician Engagement Strategy 2019-2021 1 The Torres and Cape Hospital and Health Service respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Owners / Custodians, past and present, within the lands in which we work. Cape York Ayabadhu, Alngith, Anathangayth, Anggamudi, Apalech, Binthi, Burunga, Dingaal, Girramay, Gulaal, Gugu Muminh, Guugu-Yimidhirr, Kaantju, Koko-bera, Kokomini, Kuku Thaypan, Kuku Yalanji, Kunjen/Olkol, Kuuku – Yani, Lama Lama, Mpalitjanh, Munghan, Ngaatha, Ngayimburr, Ngurrumungu, Nugal, Oolkoloo, Oompala, Peppan, Puutch, Sara, Teppathiggi, Thaayorre, Thanakwithi, Thiitharr, Thuubi, Tjungundji, Uutaalnganu, Wanam, Warrangku, Wathayn, Waya, Wik, Wik Mungkan, Wimarangga, Winchanam, Wuthathi and Yupungathi. Northern Peninsula Area Atambaya, Gudang, Yadhaykenu, Angkamuthi, Wuthathi. Torres Strait Islands The five tribal nations of the Torres Strait Islands: The Kaiwalagal The Maluilgal The Gudamaluilgal The Meriam The Kulkalgal Nations. Recognition of Australian South Sea Islanders Torres and Cape Hospital and Health Service (TCHHS) formally recognises the Australian South Sea Islanders as a distinct cultural group within our geographical boundaries. TCHHS is committed to fulfilling the Queensland Government Recognition Statement for Australian South Sea Islander Community to ensure that present and future generations of Australian South Sea Islanders have equality of opportunity to participate in and contribute to the economic, social, political and cultural life of the State. 2 TCHHS | Clinician Enagagement Strategy 2019-2021 Contents
  • Annual Report

    Annual Report

    ANNUAL REPORT Contents AIEF Annual Report 2009 1 Messages from our Patrons 2 2 Chairman’s Overview – Ray Martin AM 4 3 Chief Executive’s Report – Andrew Penfold 6 4 AIEF Scholarship Programme 8 5 AIEF 2009 Partner Schools: Kincoppal – Rose Bay School 12 Presbyterian Ladies’ College, Sydney 14 St Catherine’s School, Waverley 16 St Scholastica’s College, Glebe 18 St Vincent’s College, Potts Point 20 Other Partnerships and Scholarships 22 6 Student Overviews – Current and Past Students at 2009 Partner Schools 24 7 Financial Summary 34 APPENDIX A Governance and People 38 B Contact and Donation Details 40 1 Messages from our Patrons Her Excellency Professor Marie Bashir AC CVO Governor of New South Wales Patron-in-Chief It is an honour to be the Patron-in-Chief of the Australian Indigenous Education Foundation and to be able to follow the growth and development of the organisation over the past 12 months in its resolve and drive to create opportunities for a quality education for more Indigenous children across the nation. AIEF is an excellent example of how individuals and corporate organisations can make a difference to the lives of Indigenous children by facilitating access to educational opportunities that would not otherwise be available to them, and to do so in an efficient framework that provides clear, transparent and regular reporting. This initiative also benefits non-Indigenous children in our schools by providing the opportunity for our non-Indigenous students to form bonds of friendship with, and cultural understanding of, their Indigenous classmates. In this way, we are together working towards a brighter future for all Australians and empowering Indigenous children to have real choices in life.
  • Visitor Responses to Palm Island in the 1920S and 1930S1

    Visitor Responses to Palm Island in the 1920S and 1930S1

    ‘Socialist paradise’ or ‘inhospitable island’? Visitor responses to Palm Island in the 1920s and 1930s1 Toby Martin Tourists visiting Queensland’s Palm Island in the 1920s and 1930s followed a well-beaten path. They were ferried there in a launch, either from a larger passenger ship moored in deeper water, or from Townsville on the mainland. Having made it to the shallows, tourists would be carried ‘pick a back’ by a ‘native’ onto a ‘palm-shaded’ beach. Once on the grassy plains that stood back from the beach, they would be treated to performances such as corroborees, war dances and spear-throwing. They were also shown the efforts of the island’s administration: schools full of happy children, hospitals brimming with bonny babies, brass band performances and neat, tree-fringed streets with European- style gardens. Before being piggy-backed to their launches, the tourist could purchase authentic souvenirs, such as boomerangs and shields. As the ship pulled away from paradise, tourists could gaze back and reflect on this model Aboriginal settlement, its impressive ‘native displays’, its ‘efficient management’ and the ‘noble work’ of its staff and missionaries.2 By the early 1920s, the Palm Island Aboriginal reserve had become a major Queensland tourist destination. It offered tourists – particularly those from the southern states or from overseas – a chance to see Aboriginal people and culture as part of a comfortable day trip. Travellers to and around Australia had taken a keen interest in Aboriginal culture and its artefacts since Captain Cook commented on the ‘rage for curiosities amongst his crew’.3 From the 1880s, missions such as Lake Tyers in Victoria’s Gippsland region had attracted 1 This research was undertaken with the generous support of the State Library of NSW David Scott Mitchell Fellowship, and the ‘Touring the Past: History and Tourism in Australia 1850-2010’ ARC grant, with Richard White.
  • The Task Cards

    The Task Cards

    HEROES HEROES TASK CARD 1 TASK CARD 2 HERO RECEIVES PURPLE CROSS YOUNG AUSTRALIAN OF THE YEAR The Young Australian of the Year has been awarded since 1979. It Read the story about Sarbi and answer these questions. recognises the outstanding achievement of young Australians aged 16 to 30 and the contributions they have made to our communities. 1. What colour is associated with the Australian Special Forces? YEAR Name of Recipient Field of Achievement 2011 Jessica Watson 2. What breed of dog is Sarbi? 2010 Trooper Mark Donaldson VC 2009 Jonty Bush 3. What is Sarbi trained to do? 2008 Casey Stoner 2007 Tania Major 4. What type of animal has also received 2006 Trisha Broadbridge the Purple Cross for wartime service? 2005 Khoa Do 2004 Hugh Evans 5. In which country was Sarbi working 2003 Lleyton Hewitt when she went missing? 2002 Scott Hocknull 2001 James Fitzpatrick 6. How was Sarbi identified when she was found? 2000 Ian Thorpe OAM 1999 Dr Bryan Gaensler 7. What does MIA stand for? 1998 Tan Le 1997 Nova Peris OAM 8. Which word in the text means ‘to attack by surprise’? 1996 Rebecca Chambers 1995 Poppy King 9. How many days was Sarbi missing for? Find out what each of these people received their Young Australian 10. Why did Sarbi receive the Purple cross? Award for. Use this list of achievements to help you. Concert pianist; Astronomer; Champion Tennis Player; Sailor; Palaeontologist; MotoGP World Champion; Business Woman; World Champion Swimmer; Youth Leader & Tsunami Survivor; Anti-poverty Campaigner; Olympic Gold Medallist Athlete; Victim
  • 82 3.3.4.4.3 Ecogeographic Studies of the Cranial Shape The

    82 3.3.4.4.3 Ecogeographic Studies of the Cranial Shape The

    82 3.3.4.4.3 Ecogeographic studies of the cranial shape The measurement of the human head of both the living and dead has long been a matter of interest to a variety of professions from artists to physicians and latterly to anthropologists (for a review see Spencer 1997c). The shape of the cranium, in particular, became an important factor in schemes of racial typology from the late 18th Century (Blumenbach 1795; Deniker 1898; Dixon 1923; Haddon 1925; Huxley 1870). Following the formulation of the cranial index by Retzius in 1843 (see also Sjovold 1997), the classification of humans by skull shape became a positive fashion. Of course such classifications were predicated on the assumption that cranial shape was an immutable racial trait. However, it had long been known that cranial shape could be altered quite substantially during growth, whether due to congenital defect or morbidity or through cultural practices such as cradling and artificial cranial deformation (for reviews see (Dingwall 1931; Lindsell 1995). Thus the use of cranial index of racial identity was suspect. Another nail in the coffin of the Cranial Index's use as a classificatory trait was presented in Coon (1955), where he suggested that head form was subject to long term climatic selection. In particular he thought that rounder, or more brachycephalic, heads were an adaptation to cold. Although it was plausible that the head, being a major source of heat loss in humans (Porter 1993), could be subject to climatic selection, the situation became somewhat clouded when Beilicki and Welon demonstrated in 1964 that the trend towards brachycepahlisation was continuous between the 12th and 20th centuries in East- Central Europe and thus could not have been due to climatic selection (Bielicki & Welon 1964).
  • Carpentaria Gulf Region

    Carpentaria Gulf Region

    138°0'E 139°0'E 140°0'E 141°0'E 142°0'E 143°0'E Claimant application and determination boundary data compiled from external boundaries with areas excluded or discrete boundaries of areas finalised. NNTT based on data sourced from Department of Resources (Qld) © The being claimed) as they have been recognised by the Federal Court Currency is based on the information as held by the NNTT and may not State of Queensland for that portion where their data has been used. process. reflect all decisions of the Federal Court. Where the boundary of an application has been amended in the Federal To determine whether any areas fall within the external boundary of an Topographic vector data is © Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Court, the map shows this boundary rather than the boundary as per the application or determination, a search of the Tribunal's registers and NORTHERN Australia) 2006. Register of Native Title Claims (RNTC), if a registered application. databases is required. Further information is avaIlable from the Tribunals NORTHERN TERRITORY Carpentaria Gulf Region The applications shown on the map include: website at www.nntt.gov.au or by calling 1800 640 501 Non freehold land tenure sourced from Department of Resources (QLD) - registered applications (i.e. those that have complied with the registration © Commonwealth of Australia 2021 March 2021. test), The Registrar, the National Native Title Tribunal and its staff, members and Native Title Claimant Applications and - new and/or amended applications where the registration test is being agents and the Commonwealth (collectively the Commonwealth) accept As part of the transitional provisions of the amended Native Title Act in applied, no liability and give no undertakings guarantees or warranties concerning Determination Areas 1998, all applications were taken to have been filed in the Federal Court.