DOCSLIB.ORG

Confronting Gouldner

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Confronting Gouldner Confronting Gouldner <UN> Studies in Critical Social Sciences Series Editor David Fasenfest (Wayne State University) Editorial Board Eduardo Bonilla-Silva (Duke University) Chris Chase-Dunn (University of California-Riverside) William Carroll (University of Victoria) Raewyn Connell (University of Sydney) Kimberlé W. Crenshaw (University of California, la, and Columbia University) Heidi Gottfried (Wayne State University) Karin Gottschall (University of Bremen) Mary Romero (Arizona State University) Alfredo Saad Filho (University of London) Chizuko Ueno (University of Tokyo) Sylvia Walby (Lancaster University) VOLUME 76 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/scss <UN> Confronting Gouldner Sociology and Political Activism By James J. Chriss LEIDEN | BOSTON <UN> Cover illustration: Tea Party Protest, Hartford, Connecticut, 15 April 2009. Photo by Sage Ross. CC BY-SA 3.0. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Chriss, James J., 1955- Confronting Gouldner : sociology and political activism / by James J. Chriss. pages cm. -- (Studies in critical social sciences ; volume 76) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-23241-9 (hardback : alk. paper) 1. Gouldner, Alvin Ward, 1920-1980. 2. Sociologists--United States--Biography. 3. Marxian school of sociology--United States. 4. Industrial sociology--United States. I. Title. HM479.G68C473 2015 301.092--dc23 [B] 2014048620 This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, ipa, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface. issn 1573–4234 isbn 978-90-04-23241-9 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-23242-6 (e-book) Copyright 2015 by Koninklijke Brill nv, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill nv incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Nijhoff and Hotei Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill nv provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, ma 01923, usa. Fees are subject to change. This book is printed on acid-free paper. <UN> Contents Foreword by Richard Lee Deaton The Two Masks of Alvin Ward Gouldner: Angry Outsider and Intellectual Street Fighter – Reflections of an Undutiful Son vii Acknowledgments xxxiv List of Figures xxxv 1 The Classics and Beyond 1 2 Intellectuals and Radical Sociology 18 3 Crime and Deviance 36 4 Bourdieu and Reflexive Sociology 68 5 Radical Politics and Soviet Sociology 89 6 Religion and Critical Theory 125 7 Social Justice, Politics, and Religion 153 8 Locals, Cosmopolitans, and the Politics of a Global Humanity 171 9 Mao and the Communist Horizon 194 References 213 Index 236 <UN> Foreword The Two Masks of Alvin Ward Gouldner: Angry Outsider and Intellectual Street Fighter—Reflections of an Undutiful Son* A Jewish father has mercy upon his children. The Talmud The past is a foreign country. L. P. Hartley There is no good father, that’s the rule. Les Mots I come not to praise Caesar, but to bury him. Shakespeare I have tried to be objective. I do not claim to be detached. C. Wright Mills Acknowledgments I am more than flattered that Professor James Chriss has asked me to write this foreword to complement his second study of Professor Alvin W. Gouldner (Chriss 1999c). He has generously given me carte blanche with respect to this essay. His kind gesture and trust is most appreciated. Hopefully, our collabora- tion of some eight years has been mutually interesting and beneficial. Each of us has retained his own independent perspective and conclusions regarding the main character of this study. For me this has been a true participant- observer collaboration. Introduction C. Wright Mills and Alvin Ward Gouldner were arguably the greatest sociolo- gists of their generation and were undoubtedly the most influential and * The author gratefully acknowledges the considerable editorial and stylistic contribution of Mrs. Eleanor Hora for bringing coherence and intelligibility to this foreword. <UN> viii FOREWORD controversial sociologists of the post-World War Two period. Their originality, theoretical insights and craftsmanship as applied to various subjects and issues made them true scholars and public intellectuals. They dared ask the difficult questions and sought unpleasant truths about the nature of power, ideas, and their own profession. Although they were not always personally popular, Mills and Gouldner inspired an entire generation of young sociologists and social scientists and the issues they studied. Most importantly, they were responsible for creating what is now known as critical or radical sociology. Circumstance and my own personal history have belatedly cast me in the unintentional role of the prodigal son who demands a fair hearing for his father’s reputation and achievements. As his estranged son I can hardly claim to have been close to Professor Alvin Ward Gouldner. For reasons outlined and elaborated upon in this essay, our lives took different directions. Now I am in the unusual, if not suspect and awkward, position of trying to bring some bal- ance and perspective to any assessment of his life and work. Alas, being my father’s son, I see something of him, intellectually and personally, in myself. But it is axiomatic that personal and family histories are complex. Immediately, I am placed in a double bind or Catch-22 situation. On the one hand, if I am disparaging towards my late father, I will invariably be dismissed or accused of being unfair or harbouring a grudge as the alienated son. On the other hand, if I am laudatory or sympathetic, I will undoubtedly be accused of being a hagiographer or uncritical because of the family connection. In this “no-win” situation, I can only do my best to be honest and fair. A strong caveat is necessary to emphasize that I am not writing this essay out of malice as Professor Gouldner’s distanced son. Contrary to the imagery of Goya’s Saturn Devouring His Son, I certainly haven’t spent my life shadow box- ing or competing academically with his ghost. Nor is this a form of belated psychological catharsis, despite the opportunity this exercise has afforded me to engage in considerable introspection, and a chance to contemplate a num- ber of personal and intellectual issues. Hopefully, the background information presented here will expand our understanding of Alvin Ward Gouldner, both as a person and as a scholar. As C. Wright Mills said in another context, “I have tried to be objective. I do not claim to be detached.” Alvin W. Gouldner: Methodology of Intellectual Biography What I expect of any scholar or academic producing a well-researched intel- lectual biography of Professor Gouldner is that their work conforms to at least three criteria. First, it must be accurate with respect to the biographical facts and details of his personal and family life, as well as his academic career. <UN> FOREWORD ix Second, in interpreting his personal motives, ideologically-based politics, and intellectual work there should be a sense of fairness and balance. Third, and perhaps the most difficult of all in any intellectual biography such as this, it must establish the linkage or connection between the man and his intellectual work, at least in rough contour. In short, doing the job properly requires bal- anced craftsmanship in order to produce a full and nuanced intellectual biog- raphy (for example: Hobsbawm 2003). My father’s work and ideas were not produced in a vacuum; they must be contextualized, personally and historically. Thus, the intellectual biographer must, or should, establish the interaction between the person and his work and integrate the two to have a picture of the whole. A full and rounded evalu- ation of a person’s intellectual contribution must take into account the person himself, his background, and those formative or determinative forces acting on him, not just a limited analysis or assessment of their abstract or rarified theo- ries or ideas. Professional biographers and writers have endlessly debated the relation- ship between a person and their work, and whether any biographical back- ground or history is necessary in order to assess or appreciate their work. Where the balance or emphasis should lie between biography and intellectual history will be interminably debated. The issue is difficult, but at least recog- nizing that it exists helps to inform the subject. All the more so, when the per- sonality under study is as controversial and “difficult” as Professor Gouldner. Those wanting to satisfy their prurient curiosity, expecting or wanting a tell- all “hatchet job” revealing family secrets, or an opportunity to indulge their schadenfreude, may be sadly disappointed by what follows here. Many things are often best left unsaid, and we all have issues that we would prefer to forget or to remain private. Some of Professor Gouldner’s former colleagues and detractors should remember that they, too, may have skeletons rattling around in closets, or bedrooms. Over the years I have often wondered to what extent personal rancor and professional jealousy have played a part in, or coloured, their
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparing Capitalisms Through the Lens of Classical Sociological Theory1
    Comparing Capitalisms through the Lens of Classical Sociological Theory1 Gregory Jackson 1 Introduction The ‘classical tradition’ in sociology, stemming from Marx, Durkheim, and We- ber, continues to inspire sociological approaches to the economy (Beckert 2002; Swedberg 2000). Despite its foundational infl uence, the distinctively sociologi- cal contribution of this ‘classical’ tradition has been somewhat overshadowed by the widespread diffusion of economic theory, such as transaction costs or agency theory, and newer sociological approaches, such as network analysis or ‘new institutionalism’ in organizational analysis, in the process of forging inter- disciplinary approaches to the economy. In honor of the sixtieth birthday of Wolfgang Streeck, this essay looks at his contribution to economic sociology and its relationship to classical sociological theory. Wolfgang Streeck has retained and developed a distinctly sociological approach to the study of the economy that draws important inspiration from the classics. His closeness to the classic sociological tradition is perhaps unsur- prising given his early journey as a student in the 1970s from the ‘critical theory’ found in Frankfurt to the then often more ‘middle range’ concerns of sociology pursued at Columbia University by infl uential fi gures such as Robert Merton, Peter Blau, and Amitai Etzioni. Wolfgang Streeck was excited by the empiri- cal richness of early American sociology, as is evident in his subsequent edited volume Elementare Soziologie (1976). Alongside Durkheim, Weber, and Friedrich Engels, the book translated writings of postwar American sociologists such as Peter Blau, Alvin Gouldner, Howard Becker, and William Whyte. However, the focus was not on positivist empirical sociology, but on the way these sociologists utilized fundamental theoretical concepts, such as confl ict, exchange, or status, to inform their detailed empirical or even ethnographic fi eldwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 1982 2 from the President
    PARTICIPANT Table of Contents The Pitzer College magazine, Fall 1982 2 From the President 2 From the Editor The Pitzer Participant (USPS 970-280) is 3 Pitzer on the Population published quarterly by Pitzer College, Studies and Public Health lOSO N. Mills Avenue, Claremont, Ca. 917ll. Second class permit granted by Map Claremont, Ca. 91711. by Joanne Siegmann '79 Volume 17, Number I, Fall 1982 with assistance from Ann Stromberg Editor: Katharine M. Morsberger Staff Photographer: Sue Keith 6 Technology, Politics, and Design: Shields / Stoddard Society in China Cover: Brad Kadel '82 (right) and by Rudi Volti Terry Schuler, Director of Personnel Relations at Avery On Confronting the labels, confer a moment about 7 an aspect of production. Meaning of Human Photo: Sue Keith Meaning Photographers: George Adams, by Glenn Goodwin Shireen Alafi '76, Sue Keith, John Kruissink, Kathryn Lamb '78, 8 Organizational Studies: Agnes Lawson, Arthur Mathern, Linda Mooser, Robert E. Morsberger, Internships: Students in the Bob Penn '78, Glenn Potts, Workplace Saul Schuster, Wesley Tanimura '85, Toru Yamazoe by Anne Lieberman '83 10 New Resources: Earning a Degree While on the Job II Management Seminar: Business Comes to Campus I2 Five-Year Program: Pitzer B.A., CGS M.A. 16 From the Trustees 13 A Brief Social History of Conjuring by Peter M. Nardi IS Pitzer Profiles: Inge Bell by Laud Humphreys Homer Garcia by Martha Quintana '83 17 From the Alumni 17 At Pitzer 18 Beyond Pitzer From the From the President Editor In the following pages, you will learn more about some of these inter­ ests in a large measure through the CCASIONALLY, I encounter HEN PREPARING this issue on wo;ds of a number of Pitzer's graduates O someone who wonders how Pitzer W sociology and organizatio~al College can be both a liberal arts college in sociology and organization~ studies, studies, your editor began to feel hke an interdisciplinary concentratIOn.
    [Show full text]
  • King's Research Portal
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by King's Research Portal King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1080/0950236X.2016.1275759 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Roberts, L. (2017). Lyric Audibility: In Public. TEXTUAL PRACTICE, 1-14. DOI: 10.1080/0950236X.2016.1275759 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Methods of Sociological Analysis, Sociology 501 Graduate Class: Fall
    1 Methods of Sociological Analysis, Sociology 501 Graduate Class: Fall 2001 John Levi Martin DRAFT: CHANGES TO MAKE Course Description: This class is designed to give sociology students an awareness of the diversity and commonalities of methods of sociological analysis, by critically studying exemplary works. Students will do a number of exercises in which they make use of each and every method studied. I hope that at the conclusion you understand (1) how to choose a sociological research project that will not be a dead end; (2) how to choose a method that will help you answer your questions and will also be fun for you; (3) how to critically evaluate the presentation of evidence in support of theoretical claims. Structure: We will go through a number of different methods, namely historical, ethnography, experimental, and interviewing, spending time that is roughly in proportion to the distribution of use among Rutgers students. But first we will start with some general aspects of method in sociology. We will also close with a discussion of the presentation of results, which may be different from the process of obtaining results. Each day will involve a combination of lecture and discussion. Usually I will have something prepared regarding 1) what is distinctive about a certain method, its advantages and disadvantages; 2) who uses these methods and why; 3) how the common methodological themes play out here; 4) how the works we read illustrate the methods. Then we will discuss the works in question, paying attention to 1) do the methods work? 2) were the methods done well? 3) do the methods match the questions? 4) do we see advantages or disadvantages to the method come out in the examples? Requirements: 1) Active attendance.
    [Show full text]
  • Alvin W. Gouldner and Industrial Sociology at Columbia University
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Sociology & Criminology Faculty Publications Sociology & Criminology Department 2001 Alvin W. Gouldner and Industrial Sociology at Columbia University James Chriss Cleveland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clsoc_crim_facpub Part of the Criminology Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Publisher's Statement The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com Repository Citation Chriss, James, "Alvin W. Gouldner and Industrial Sociology at Columbia University" (2001). Sociology & Criminology Faculty Publications. 24. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clsoc_crim_facpub/24 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology & Criminology Department at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology & Criminology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALVIN W. GOULDNER AND INDUSTRIAL SOCIOLOGY AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY James J. Chriss, Cleveland State University Alvin W Gouldner (1920-1980) was a prolific socicl.ogist of the post-World War II era who spent the early part of his career (the 1950,) in the field of industrial , ociology. A case study of Gouldner's early life and career is useful insofar as it intertwines with the develcyment of industrial sociology as a distinct subfield within sociology. Through this analysis we are also better able to understand how and in what ways a burgeoning orga­ nizational studi es program develcyed at Ccl.umbia University during the 1940,. This anal­ ysis of the historical and cultural contexts within which Gouldner came to prcminence as an industrial sociologist at Columbia, and the intellectual program that resulted, can al so help shed light on more r ecent trends in organizational studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Sociological Research University of Chicago Graduate Class: Winter 2018 2:00 PM – 3:20 PM, Tuesdays and Thursdays John Levi Martin
    1 Sociology 30002 Principles of Sociological Research University of Chicago Graduate Class: Winter 2018 2:00 PM – 3:20 PM, Tuesdays and Thursdays John Levi Martin Course Description How do you make knowledge in sociology? That’s what this class is about. We are going to look at issues of research design and process while also exploring the diversity of methods of sociological analysis. Further, we will be doing this in a way that helps you work towards an original research paper. But we will do so in a way that forces you to look at your question from multiple angles. As a result, we will be doing three sorts of things in this all-too-brief quarter. We will be reading a bit about, and discussing, general issues of research design. We will be reading exemplary works using different sorts of methods. We will be doing exercises related to our question, trying out different methods and seeing what kinds of things we can learn using them. I hope that at the conclusion you understand (1) how to choose a sociological research project that will not be a dead end; (2) how to choose a method that will help you answer your questions and will also be fun for you; (3) how to critically evaluate the presentation of evidence in support of theoretical claims. Structure We will go through a number of different methods, namely historical, ethnography, experimental, and interviewing, spending time that is roughly in proportion to the distribution of use among Chicago students. But first we will start with some general aspects of method in sociology.
    [Show full text]
  • Alvin W. Gouldner and Industrial Sociology at Columbia University James Chriss Cleveland State University, [email protected]
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Sociology & Criminology Faculty Publications Sociology & Criminology Department 2001 Alvin W. Gouldner and Industrial Sociology at Columbia University James Chriss Cleveland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clsoc_crim_facpub Part of the Criminology Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons How does access to this work benefit oy u? Let us know! Publisher's Statement The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com Repository Citation Chriss, James, "Alvin W. Gouldner and Industrial Sociology at Columbia University" (2001). Sociology & Criminology Faculty Publications. 24. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clsoc_crim_facpub/24 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology & Criminology Department at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology & Criminology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALVIN W. GOULDNER AND INDUSTRIAL SOCIOLOGY AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY James J. Chriss, Cleveland State University Alvin W Gouldner (1920-1980) was a prolific socicl.ogist of the post-World War II era who spent the early part of his career (the 1950,) in the field of industrial , ociology. A case study of Gouldner's early life and career is useful insofar as it intertwines with the develcyment of industrial sociology as a distinct subfield within sociology. Through this analysis we are also better able to understand how and in what ways a burgeoning orga­ nizational studi es program develcyed at Ccl.umbia University during the 1940,. This anal­ ysis of the historical and cultural contexts within which Gouldner came to prcminence as an industrial sociologist at Columbia, and the intellectual program that resulted, can al so help shed light on more r ecent trends in organizational studies.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interdisciplinary Journal
    FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITA LISM FAST CAPITALISMFast Capitalism FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM ISSNFAST XXX-XXXX CAPITALISM FAST Volume 2 • Issue 2 • 2006 CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITA LISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITA LISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITA LISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITA LISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITA LISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM
    [Show full text]
  • ': Twenty-Five Years After Laud Humphreys' Tearoom Trade
    ‘‘The Breastplate of Righteousness’’: Twenty-Five Years After Laud Humphreys’ Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places Peter M. Nardi, PhD Pitzer College ABSTRACT. Twenty-five years ago, in January 1970, Laud Hum- phreys’ Tearoom Trade was published. It generated much controver- sy, yet went on to win the C. Wright Mills Award of the Society for the Study of Social Problems. Today, many remember and debate its methodology and ethical issues while often overlooking its impor- tant findings and its early contributions to the emerging field of gay studies. Humphreys’ findings are reviewed and commemorated and his work is assessed in light of recent studies on sex in public places. The January 1970 issue of Transaction published the first paper from Laud Humphreys’ soon-to-be notorious research and book on ‘‘impersonal sex in public places.’’ The publication of that article and the book, Tearoom Trade (1970, expanded edition 1975), gen- erated a storm of debate about the ethics of research that continues 25 years later in many introductory sociology and methods text- Peter M. Nardi is Professor of Sociology at Pitzer College. Ralph Bolton and Glenn Goodwin provided comments on an earlier draft of this article, which was presented at the Society for Cross-Cultural Research meetings, Santa Fe, NM, February 1994. Correspondence may be addressed: Peter M. Nardi, Sociology Department, Pitzer College, 1050 N. Mills Ave., Claremont, CA 91711. E-Mail: [email protected] Journal of Homosexuality, Vol. 30(2) 1995 E 1995 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 2 JOURNAL OF HOMOSEXUALITY books.
    [Show full text]
  • ALVIN W. GOULDNER and INDUSTRIAL SOCIOLOGY at Base of 1St COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Line of ART
    JHBS—WILEY RIGHT BATCH Top of ID Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences Vol. 37(3), 241–259 Summer 2001 ᭧ 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ALVIN W. GOULDNER AND INDUSTRIAL SOCIOLOGY AT Base of 1st COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY line of ART JAMES J. CHRISS Alvin W. Gouldner (1920–1980) was a prolific sociologist of the post-World War II era who spent the early part of his career (the 1950s) in the field of industrial sociology. A case study of Gouldner’s early life and career is useful insofar as it intertwines with the development of industrial sociology as a distinct subfield within sociology. Through this analysis we are also better able to understand how and in what ways a burgeoning orga- nizational studies program developed at Columbia University during the 1940s. This anal- ysis of the historical and cultural contexts within which Gouldner came to prominence as an industrial sociologist at Columbia, and the intellectual program that resulted, can also help shed light on more recent trends in organizational studies. ᭧ 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. There are a variety of good reasons for studying the life and times of Alvin W. Gouldner. First, Gouldner was one of the more prolific and influential sociologists of the post-WWII era. Although in this article I will be concentrating exclusively on his early career as a standout JAMES J. CHRISS is assistant professor of sociology at Cleveland State University. His current research interests are juvenile delinquency, criminological and sociological theory, law, and mental health. His latest books are Alvin W. Gouldner: Sociologist and Outlaw Marxist (Ashgate, 1999), and an edited volume, Counseling and the Therapeutic State (Aldine de Gruyter, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Lit Rev Writing
    2 Literature review Casual sex between men This chapter looks at sociological investigations of sex between men. First I discuss ethnographic studies that focus on particular settings: beats or cruising grounds, then sex clubs and saunas. What is the picture they give us of what goes on in such settings? Then I look at studies in which men who have casual sex with other men were interviewed about their sexual activities. Finally I consider the implications of the different methodologies: what kinds of answers do we get from the different approaches? Beats: ethnographic studies Several of the key ethnographic studies of men’s casual or public sex were performed before current interest in male homosexual activity was inspired by AIDS in the 1980s. This work from the 1960s and 1970s is largely framed within the sociology of deviance; indeed Troiden’s paper on ‘Homosexual encounters in a highway rest stop’ (discussed below, p. 53) appears in a book explicitly called Sexual Deviance and Sexual Deviants. The classic work on sex in what Australians call ‘beats’—parks, toilets, beaches and other public places where men meet for anonymous sex (called tearooms in the United States and cottages in the United Kingdom)—is Laud Humphreys’ Tearoom Trade, published in 1970. Humphreys did an observational study of men’s sexual encounters in public lavatories. In order to observe these encounters, Humphreys took the role of the ‘watchqueen’ or voyeur-lookout, which he describes as ‘a role superbly suited for sociologists and the only lookout role that is not overtly sexual’ (1970, pp. 27–8).
    [Show full text]
  • Sociology 105: Research Design and Sociological Methods Fall 2019
    Soc 105: Research Design and Sociological Methods Fall 2019 University of California, Berkeley Jill Bakehorn CN: 31023 Sociology 105: Research Design and Sociological Methods Fall 2019 INSTRUCTOR Jill Bakehorn, PhD (Pronouns: she/her or they/them) E-mail: [email protected] Office: 479 Barrows Hall Drop-in Office Hours: Wednesdays 10:15-11:15am Sign-up Office Hours: Mondays 10:30-11:30am Sign-up: http://www.wejoinin.com/JillBakehorn CLASS MEETING Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays 9:00-9:59am 101 Wurster COURSE DESCRIPTION This course is meant to be an introduction to methods and research design; it is specifically geared toward guiding students in the development of a sociological research project. We will be addressing some of the major concerns and issues related to sociological research including: the goals of sociological research, methodologies, developing a research topic and question, theoretical traditions, literature reviews, ethics, and reporting on research findings. In this seminar you will begin the transition from being a consumer of sociological research, synthesizing others’ work, to a producer of sociological knowledge. This can seem like a particularly intimidating process, so we will break down the steps involved. The small size of the class means that we can spend class time discussing your questions and concerns about the research process. We will treat class time like a workshop for your individual projects. While lecture will be a component of class time, your active participation in the course is required. You will produce an original research proposal that can be the starting place of your senior/honors thesis/scholarship research or a springboard for graduate school.
    [Show full text]