Reassembling Scholarly Communications

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reassembling Scholarly Communications Reassembling Scholarly Communications Reassembling Scholarly Communications Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access Edited by Martin Paul Eve and Jonathan Gray The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England © 2020 Massachusetts Institute of Technology This work is subject to a Creative Commons CC BY license. Subject to such license, all rights are reserved. The open access edition of this book was made possible by generous funding and support from Arcadia (a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin), the Open Society Foundations, the Open Knowledge Foundation, Birkbeck, University of London, and the Leverhulme Trust. This book was set in Stone Serif and Stone Sans by Westchester Publishing Services. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Eve, Martin Paul, 1986- editor. | Gray, Jonathan, 1983- editor. Title: Reassembling scholarly communications : histories, infrastructures, and global politics of open access / edited by Martin Paul Eve and Jonathan Gray. Description: Cambridge, Massachusetts : The MIT Press, [2020] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2020000429 | ISBN 9780262536240 (paperback) Subjects: LCSH: Open access publishing. | Communication in learning and scholarship. | Open access publishing--Social aspects. | Communication in learning and scholarship--Social aspects. Classification: LCC Z286.O63 R43 2020 | DDC 001.2--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020000429 In memory of Professor William Gray (1952– 2019) Contents Grammatical and Terminological Notes xi Acknowledgments xiii Abbreviations and Glossary xv Introduction 1 Martin Paul Eve and Jonathan Gray I Colonial Influences 1 Epistemic Alienation in African Scholarly Communications: Open Access as a Pharmakon 25 Thomas Hervé Mboa Nkoudou 2 Scholarly Communications and Social Justice 41 Charlotte Roh, Harrison W. Inefuku, and Emily Drabinski 3 Social Justice and Inclusivity: Drivers for the Dissemination of African Scholarship 53 Reggie Raju, Jill Claassen, Namhla Madini, and Tamzyn Suliaman 4 Can Open Scholarly Practices Redress Epistemic Injustice? 65 Denisse Albornoz, Angela Okune, and Leslie Chan II Epistemologies 5 When the Law Advances Access to Learning: Locke and the Origins of Modern Copyright 83 John Willinsky 6 How Does a Format Make a Public? 103 Robin de Mourat, Donato Ricci, and Bruno Latour viii Contents 7 Peer Review: Readers in the Making of Scholarly Knowledge 113 David Pontille and Didier Torny 8 The Making of Empirical Knowledge: Recipes, Craft, and Scholarly Communication 125 Pamela H. Smith, Tianna Helena Uchacz, Naomi Rosenkranz, and Claire Conklin Sabel III Publics and Politics 9 The Royal Society and the Noncommercial Circulation of Knowledge 147 Aileen Fyfe 10 The Political Histories of UK Public Libraries and Access to Knowledge 161 Stuart Lawson 11 Libraries and Their Publics in the United States 173 Maura A. Smale 12 Open Access, “Publicity,” and Democratic Knowledge 181 John Holmwood IV Archives and Preservation 13 Libraries, Museums, and Archives as Speculative Knowledge Infrastructure 195 Bethany Nowviskie 14 Preserving the Past for the Future: Whose Past? Everyone’s Future 205 April M. Hathcock 15 Is There a Text in These Data? The Digital Humanities and Preserving the Evidence 215 Dorothea Salo 16 Accessing the Past, or Should Archives Provide Open Access? 229 István Rév Contents ix V Infrastructures and Platforms 17 Infrastructural Experiments and the Politics of Open Access 251 Jonathan Gray 18 The Platformization of Open 265 Penny C. S. Andrews 19 Reading Scholarship Digitally 277 Martin Paul Eve 20 Toward Linked Open Data for Latin America 285 Arianna Becerril- García and Eduardo Aguado- López 21 The Pasts, Presents, and Futures of SciELO 297 Abel L. Packer VI Global Communities 22 Not Self- Indulgence, but Self-Preservation: Open Access and the Ethics of Care 317 Eileen A. Joy 23 Toward a Global Open- Access Scholarly Communications System: A Developing Region Perspective 331 Dominique Babini 24 Learned Societies, Humanities Publishing, and Scholarly Communication in the UK 343 Jane Winters 25 Not All Networks: Toward Open, Sustainable Research Communities 351 Kathleen Fitzpatrick Conclusion 361 Martin Paul Eve and Jonathan Gray Bibliography 365 Contributors 423 Index 433 Grammatical and Terminological Notes In this book, we spell the phrasal noun and postpositive compound adjec- tive “open access,” the prepositive compound adjective “open- access,” and the heterogeneous group of individuals devoted to the advancement of open access, the “Open Access Movement” (although the extent to which there is a “movement” as such is a question that deserves ongoing scrutiny and empirical elaboration). Contributors have used a variety of terms throughout this book to refer to the commonalities between Latin America, the Caribbean, the African continent, and elsewhere in a seemingly homogeneous bloc. Some of our contributors have preferred the term “Global South,” while others find this concept to be patronizing and simplistic and have used “developing nations” or “developing countries” instead.1 These latter variants, though, also have a potentially patronizing quality in suggesting a unified path to “develop- ment” that follows Anglo- American- European cultures, and so are disliked by others. Other possibilities that were not used include “less economically developed countries,” “low- and lower- middle- income countries,” and “the majority world.” Every single one of these terms has its own advantages and drawbacks. In this book, we chose to leave contributors free to select their own terms, particularly when authors culturally identified themselves with the regions they were describing. In our own editorial sections of the book, we have used the terms “Global South” and “Global North” to refer to a world- wide division in equity of wealth as a result of colonial legacies and ongo- ing prestige practices. We recognize that this editorial decision will appeal to some readers and meet with scorn from others. We apologize, in advance, to the latter group and hope that our sincere desire and advocacy for a more equal and just knowledge world can excuse our infelicities of language. Contributor biographical statements, including titles, are presented as specified by authors rather than being subject to any stylistic unification. Acknowledgments This book has had a long gestation and the editors would both like to extend their thanks to the many individuals in the world of open access, its attendant conversations, and its often tricky implementations. Martin Paul Eve would like to thank his colleagues at Birkbeck, Uni- versity of London and, in particular, all those who have worked with him on the Open Library of Humanities: Caroline Edwards, Andy Byers, Rose Harris- Birtill, Mauro Sanchez, Helen Saunders, Paula Clemente Vega, and Marija Katic. Martin has also had tremendous support from academic col- leagues in the School of Arts at Birkbeck, especially from Anthony Bale as Dean, Heike Bauer as Head of Department of English, Theatre, and Creative Writing, and Isabel Davis as Head of Research. Other individuals continue to inspire him with their intellects and generosity in the open-access and other research spaces, including Janneka Adema, Juan Pablo Alperin, Josh Bolick, Joe Brooker (for discussions about “just blogging”), Susan Bruce, Michael Collins, Geoff Crossick, Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Hilary Fraser, Rupert Gatti, Alex Gil, Gary Hall, Richard Hall, Patricia Hswe, Ben Johnson, Eileen A. F. Joy, Matthew Kirschenbaum, Stuart Lawson, Mark Leach, Alan Liu, Sam Moore, Ross Mounce, Cameron Neylon, Daniel O’Donnell, Ernesto Priego, Rick Rylance, Johan Rooryck, Helen Snaith, Peter Suber, Demmy Verbeke, Don Waters, Peter Webster, and Jane Winters. The perils of such a list are, of course, that I have inevitably omitted people to whom I owe thanks and so I extend my apologies to those included in this sociology of absence. Thanks also from Martin to Gill Hinks, Ethel Gray, Rich Hinks, Alyce Magritte, Sue Eve- Jones, Juliet Eve, Lisa Holloway, Carin Eve, Anthony Eve, Julia Eve, and Sam Jones. Martin’s greatest and final thanks go, though, to his wife, Helen. Jonathan Gray would like to thank friends and colleagues at the Digital Methods Initiative (University of Amsterdam), the médialab at Sciences Po xiv Acknowledgments (Paris), the Department of Digital Humanities at King’s College London, the Public Data Lab and beyond for discussions, collaborations and experi- ments around “making research public,” which have inspired and encour- aged different aspects of this book—in particular Liliana Bounegru, Carolin Gerlitz, Anne Helmond, Lucy Kimbell, Bruno Latour, Noortje Marres, Michele Mauri, Sabine Niederer, Natalia Sanchez Querubin, Richard Rogers and Tommaso Venturini. He is also grateful to Bill Gray, to whom this work is dedicated, for showing the passage of sparks as an ongoing collective endeavor and for staying with us a little longer. Both editors would like to express their thanks to the Open Society Foundations, the Open Knowledge Foundation, and to Birkbeck, Univer- sity of London, who provided funding and support to make this volume itself open access. Martin Paul Eve would like to thank the Leverhulme Trust for his award of the 2019 Philip Leverhulme Prize that facilitated work on this volume. Thanks are due to Gita Manaktala at the MIT Press for tak- ing the project on and Rebecca Kennison and other reviewers for provid-
Recommended publications
  • Among Us by Nina Runa Essendrop
    1 . Among us By Nina Runa Essendrop A poetic and sensuous scenario about human loneliness and about the longing of the angels for the profound beauty which is found in every human life. 2 Preview Humans are ever present. They see the world in colors. They feel and they think and they walk on two feet. They touch the water and feel the cold softness of the surface. They gaze at the horizon and think deep thoughts about their existence. Humans feel the wind against their faces, they laugh and they cry and their pleading eyes seek for a meaning in the world around them. They breathe too fast and they forget to feel the ground under their feet or the invisible hand on their shoulder, which gently offers them comfort and peace. Angels exist among the humans. Invisible and untouchable they witness how humans live their lives. Their silent voices gently form mankind’s horizons, far away and so very very close that only children and dreamers will sense their presence. "Among us" is a poetic and sensuous scenario about a lonely human being, an angel who chooses the immediacy of mortal life, and an angel who continues to be the invisible guardian of mankind. It is a slow and thoughtful experience focussing on how beautiful, difficult and meaningful it is to be a human being. The scenario is played as a chamber larp and the players will be prepared for the play-style and tools through a workshop. The scenario is based on the film ”Wings of Desire” by Win Wender.
    [Show full text]
  • Uila Supported Apps
    Uila Supported Applications and Protocols updated Oct 2020 Application/Protocol Name Full Description 01net.com 01net website, a French high-tech news site. 050 plus is a Japanese embedded smartphone application dedicated to 050 plus audio-conferencing. 0zz0.com 0zz0 is an online solution to store, send and share files 10050.net China Railcom group web portal. This protocol plug-in classifies the http traffic to the host 10086.cn. It also 10086.cn classifies the ssl traffic to the Common Name 10086.cn. 104.com Web site dedicated to job research. 1111.com.tw Website dedicated to job research in Taiwan. 114la.com Chinese web portal operated by YLMF Computer Technology Co. Chinese cloud storing system of the 115 website. It is operated by YLMF 115.com Computer Technology Co. 118114.cn Chinese booking and reservation portal. 11st.co.kr Korean shopping website 11st. It is operated by SK Planet Co. 1337x.org Bittorrent tracker search engine 139mail 139mail is a chinese webmail powered by China Mobile. 15min.lt Lithuanian news portal Chinese web portal 163. It is operated by NetEase, a company which 163.com pioneered the development of Internet in China. 17173.com Website distributing Chinese games. 17u.com Chinese online travel booking website. 20 minutes is a free, daily newspaper available in France, Spain and 20minutes Switzerland. This plugin classifies websites. 24h.com.vn Vietnamese news portal 24ora.com Aruban news portal 24sata.hr Croatian news portal 24SevenOffice 24SevenOffice is a web-based Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. 24ur.com Slovenian news portal 2ch.net Japanese adult videos web site 2Shared 2shared is an online space for sharing and storage.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Capitalisms Through the Lens of Classical Sociological Theory1
    Comparing Capitalisms through the Lens of Classical Sociological Theory1 Gregory Jackson 1 Introduction The ‘classical tradition’ in sociology, stemming from Marx, Durkheim, and We- ber, continues to inspire sociological approaches to the economy (Beckert 2002; Swedberg 2000). Despite its foundational infl uence, the distinctively sociologi- cal contribution of this ‘classical’ tradition has been somewhat overshadowed by the widespread diffusion of economic theory, such as transaction costs or agency theory, and newer sociological approaches, such as network analysis or ‘new institutionalism’ in organizational analysis, in the process of forging inter- disciplinary approaches to the economy. In honor of the sixtieth birthday of Wolfgang Streeck, this essay looks at his contribution to economic sociology and its relationship to classical sociological theory. Wolfgang Streeck has retained and developed a distinctly sociological approach to the study of the economy that draws important inspiration from the classics. His closeness to the classic sociological tradition is perhaps unsur- prising given his early journey as a student in the 1970s from the ‘critical theory’ found in Frankfurt to the then often more ‘middle range’ concerns of sociology pursued at Columbia University by infl uential fi gures such as Robert Merton, Peter Blau, and Amitai Etzioni. Wolfgang Streeck was excited by the empiri- cal richness of early American sociology, as is evident in his subsequent edited volume Elementare Soziologie (1976). Alongside Durkheim, Weber, and Friedrich Engels, the book translated writings of postwar American sociologists such as Peter Blau, Alvin Gouldner, Howard Becker, and William Whyte. However, the focus was not on positivist empirical sociology, but on the way these sociologists utilized fundamental theoretical concepts, such as confl ict, exchange, or status, to inform their detailed empirical or even ethnographic fi eldwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Sci-Hub Increasing Visibility of Indian Research Papers? an Analytical Evaluation Vivek Kumar Singh1,*, Satya Swarup Srichandan1, Sujit Bhattacharya2
    Journal of Scientometric Res. 2021; 10(1):130-134 http://www.jscires.org Perspective Paper Is Sci-Hub Increasing Visibility of Indian Research Papers? An Analytical Evaluation Vivek Kumar Singh1,*, Satya Swarup Srichandan1, Sujit Bhattacharya2 1Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA. 2CSIR-National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies, New Delhi, INDIA. ABSTRACT Sci-Hub, founded by Alexandra Elbakyan in 2011 in Kazakhstan has, over the years, Correspondence emerged as a very popular source for researchers to download scientific papers. It is Vivek Kumar Singh believed that Sci-Hub contains more than 76 million academic articles. However, recently Department of Computer Science, three foreign academic publishers (Elsevier, Wiley and American Chemical Society) have Banaras Hindu University, filed a lawsuit against Sci-Hub and LibGen before the Delhi High Court and prayed for Varanasi-221005, INDIA. complete blocking these websites in India. It is in this context, that this paper attempts to Email id: [email protected] find out how many Indian research papers are available in Sci-Hub and who downloads them. The citation advantage of Indian research papers available on Sci-Hub is analysed, Received: 16-03-2021 with results confirming that such an advantage do exist. Revised: 29-03-2021 Accepted: 25-04-2021 Keywords: Indian Research, Indian Science, Black Open Access, Open Access, Sci-Hub. DOI: 10.5530/jscires.10.1.16 INTRODUCTION access publishing of their research output, and at the same time encouraging their researchers to publish in openly Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) has become one accessible forms.
    [Show full text]
  • PATHWAYS to OPEN ACCESS University of California Libraries
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2-27-2018 PATHWAYS TO OPEN ACCESS University of California Libraries Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons University of California Libraries, "PATHWAYS TO OPEN ACCESS" (2018). Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.. 74. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/74 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. PATHWAYS TO OPEN ACCESS Approved 27 February 2018 Prepared by the University of California Libraries PATHWAYS TO OPEN ACCESS Table of Contents Introduction 1 Definitions 1 Approaches & Strategies 2 Green OA 2 Gold OA, APC-based 12 Gold OA, Non-APC Funded 23 Universal Strategies 28 Possible Next Steps 35 Green OA 35 Gold OA, APC-based 36 Gold OA, Non-APC-based 37 Universal Strategies 38 Selected Bibliography 40 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the University of California (UC) Council of University Librarian’s (CoUL)1 3 August 2017 charge, this Pathways to OA Working Group2 has identified the current universe of Open Access (OA) approaches, and has analyzed the suite of strategies available for effectuating those approaches. Each approach described within this Pathways document offers unique and, in some cases, overlapping challenges, opportunities, and room for experimentation.
    [Show full text]
  • BACLS-WHN 2018 Loughborough Programme
    BACLS-WHN 18 Programme Contents Maps .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Campus Maps .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Maps from Loughborough Station ...................................................................................................... 3 Map for conference dinner at Tarboush ............................................................................................. 4 Wifi, Contacts, etc. ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Connecting to the Imago Wi-Fi ............................................................................................................ 7 Contacts ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Plenaries, Performances, Exhibitions ...................................................................................................... 8 Keynotes .................................................................................................................................................. 8 ECR Roundtable ..................................................................................................................................... 9 The Decline and Fall of the Home
    [Show full text]
  • Joe Mcarthur - @Mcarthur Joe Assistant Director, Right to Research Coalition Co-Founder and Co-Lead of the Open Access Button
    Barriers and Impact Joe McArthur - @Mcarthur_Joe Assistant Director, Right to Research Coalition Co-founder and Co-Lead of the Open Access Button openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button These slides, videos and more: bit.ly/OI9OAB openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Launched in Summer 2009. Built around the Student Statement on the Right to Research: access to research is a student right International alliance of 77 graduate & undergraduate student organizations, representing nearly 7 million students We Educate + Advocate for Open Access openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Todays talk Barriers and impact for: •the Open Access Button; •Open Access. openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button How the Button Works openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Desktop App Mobile App openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Mobile Login openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Mobile Follow the instructions openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Mobile Menu openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Mobile Do some research .. browser openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Mobile Hit paywall openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Mobile FAQ bit openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Web Hit paywall openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button The Firefox Web App openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Web openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Web Same image, circled button image openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Web openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Web Click wishlist. openaccessbutton.org @OA_Button Web Story
    [Show full text]
  • Reproducible and Transparent Research Practices in Published Neurology Research
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/763730; this version posted September 26, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 TITLE: Reproducible and Transparent Research Practices in Published Neurology Research 2 Authors: Shelby Rauh, MS1, Trevor Torgerson, BS1, Austin L. Johnson, BS1, Jonathan Pollard, BS2, 3 Daniel Tritz, BS1, Matt Vassar, PhD1. 4 Affiliation: 5 1. Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma. 6 2. Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, Missouri. 7 Corresponding Author: Shelby Rauh 1111 W 17th St. Tulsa, OK 74137. 8 Email: [email protected] 9 Phone: (918) 582-1972 10 Data Availability Statement: All protocols, materials, and raw data are available online via bioRxiv 11 (BIOARKIV/2019/763730). 12 Funding and Conflict of Interest: This study was funded through the 2019 Presidential Research 13 Fellowship Mentor – Mentee Program at Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences. We 14 declare no conflicts of interest. 15 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/763730; this version posted September 26, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 16 Abstract 17 Background 18 The objective of this study was to evaluate the nature and extent of reproducible and transparent research 19 practices in neurology research. 20 Methods 21 The NLM catalog was used to identify MEDLINE-indexed neurology journals. A PubMed search of these 22 journals was conducted to retrieve publications over a 5-year period from 2014 to 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Piratez Are Just Disgruntled Consumers Reach Global Theaters That They Overlap the Domestic USA Blu-Ray Release
    Moviegoers - or perhaps more accurately, lovers of cinema - are frustrated. Their frustrations begin with the discrepancies in film release strategies and timing. For example, audiences that saw Quentin Tarantino’s1 2 Django Unchained in the United States enjoyed its opening on Christmas day 2012; however, in Europe and other markets, viewers could not pay to see the movie until after the 17th of January 2013. Three weeks may not seem like a lot, but some movies can take months to reach an international audience. Some take so long to Piratez Are Just Disgruntled Consumers reach global theaters that they overlap the domestic USA Blu-Ray release. This delay can seem like an eternity for ultiscreen is at the top of the entertainment a desperate fan. This frustrated enthusiasm, combined industry’s agenda for delivering digital video. This with a lack of timely availability, leads to the feeling of M is discussed in the context of four main screens: being treated as a second class citizen - and may lead TVs, PCs, tablets and mobile phones. The premise being the over-anxious fan to engage in piracy. that multiscreen enables portability, usability and flexibility for consumers. But, there is a fifth screen which There has been some evolution in this practice, with is often overlooked – the cornerstone of the certain films being released simultaneously to a domestic and global audience. For example, Avatar3 was released entertainment industry - cinema. This digital video th th ecosystem is not complete without including cinema, and in theaters on the 10 and 17 of December in most it certainly should be part of the multiscreen discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Sci-Hub Kill the Open Access Citation Advantage and (At Least for Now) Save Toll Access Journals?
    Will Sci-Hub Kill the Open Access Citation Advantage and (at least for now) Save Toll Access Journals? David W. Lewis October 2016 © 2016 David W. Lewis. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Introduction It is a generally accepted fact that open access journal articles enjoy a citation advantage.1 This citation advantage results from the fact that open access journal articles are available to everyone in the word with an Internet collection. Thus, anyone with an interest in the work can find it and use it easily with no out-of-pocket cost. This use leads to citations. Articles in toll access journals on the other hand, are locked behind paywalls and are only available to those associated with institutions who can afford the subscription costs, or who are willing and able to purchase individual articles for $30 or more. There has always been some slippage in the toll access journal system because of informal sharing of articles. Authors will usually send copies of their work to those who ask and sometime post them on their websites even when this is not allowable under publisher’s agreements. Stevan Harnad and his colleagues proposed making this type of author sharing a standard semi-automated feature for closed articles in institutional repositories.2 The hashtag #ICanHazPDF can be used to broadcast a request for an article that an individual does not have access to.3 Increasingly, toll access articles are required by funder mandates to be made publically available, though usually after an embargo period.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Science in Archaeology
    Marwick, B. et al. (2017) Open science in archaeology. SAA Archaeological Record, 17(4), pp. 8-14. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/148887/ Deposited on: 29 September 2017 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk Open Science in Archaeology Ben Marwick*, Jade d’Alpoim Guedes, C. Michael Barton, Lynsey A. Bates, Michael Baxter, Andrew Bevan, Elizabeth A. Bollwerk, R. Kyle Bocinsky, Tom Brughmans, Alison K. Carter, Cyler Conrad, Daniel A. Contreras, Stefano Costa, Enrico R. Crema, Adrianne Daggett, Benjamin Davies, B. Lee Drake, Thomas S. Dye, Phoebe France, Richard Fullagar, Domenico Giusti, Shawn Graham, Matthew D. Harris, John Hawks, Sebastian Heath, Damien Huffer, Eric C. Kansa, Sarah Whitcher Kansa, Mark E. Madsen, Jennifer Melcher, Joan Negre, Fraser D. Neiman, Rachel Opitz, David C. Orton, Paulina Przystupa, Maria Raviele, Julien Riel-Salvatore, Philip Riris, Iza Romanowska, Néhémie Strupler, Isaac I. Ullah, Hannah G. Van Vlack, Ethan C. Watrall, Chris Webster, Joshua Wells, Judith Winters, Colin D. Wren * corresponding author, [email protected] Introduction In archaeology, we are accustomed to investing great effort into collecting data from fieldwork, museum collections, and other sources, followed by detailed description, rigorous analysis, and in many cases ending with publication of our findings in short, highly concentrated reports or journal articles. Very often, these publications are all that is visible of this lengthy process, and even then, most of our journal articles are only accessible to scholars at institutions paying subscription fees to the journal publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full White Paper
    Open Access White Paper University of Oregon SENATE SUB-COMMITTEE ON OPEN ACCESS I. Executive Summary II. Introduction a. Definition and History of the Open Access Movement b. History of Open Access at the University of Oregon c. The Senate Subcommittee on Open Access at the University of Oregon III. Overview of Current Open Access Trends and Practices a. Open Access Formats b. Advantages and Challenges of the Open Access Approach IV. OA in the Process of Research & Dissemination of Scholarly Works at UO a. A Summary of Current Circumstances b. Moving Towards Transformative Agreements c. Open Access Publishing at UO V. Advancing Open Access at the University of Oregon and Beyond a. Barriers to Moving Forward with OA b. Suggestions for Local Action at UO 1 Executive Summary The state of global scholarly communications has evolved rapidly over the last two decades, as libraries, funders and some publishers have sought to hasten the spread of more open practices for the dissemination of results in scholarly research worldwide. These practices have become collectively known as Open Access (OA), defined as "the free, immediate, online availability of research articles combined with the rights to use these articles fully in the digital environment." The aim of this report — the Open Access White Paper by the Senate Subcommittee on Open Access at the University of Oregon — is to review the factors that have precipitated these recent changes and to explain their relevance for members of the University of Oregon community. Open Access History and Trends Recently, the OA movement has gained momentum as academic institutions around the globe have begun negotiating and signing creative, new agreements with for-profit commercial publishers, and as innovations to the business models for disseminating scholarly research have become more widely adopted.
    [Show full text]