Tora Bora Reconsidered

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tora Bora Reconsidered COMMENTARY | Tora Bora Reconsidered Coalition forces offload from U.S. Army Chinook during Operation Torii Lock) T. (Jeremy U.S. Air Force Tora Bora Reconsidered LESSONS FROM 125 YEARS OF STRATEGIC MANHUNTS By BENJAMIN RUNKLE rior to the raid on Abbottabad, appeared alive on a videotape on December Pakistan, in May 2011, the 27. Unfortunately, much of the debate on this seminal event in the 13-year operation has been marked by partisan fin- P hunt for Osama bin Laden ger-pointing and bureaucratic score-settling, was the operation to capture or kill the generating more heat than light and doing Saudi terrorist at Tora Bora in December future U.S. commanders and policymakers a 2001. Although the operation started with grave disservice. great anticipation due to reports that bin But the killing of bin Laden allows for Laden and al Qaeda’s senior leadership were more measured analysis of what went wrong Dr. Benjamin Runkle is a Veteran of Operation surrounded in a remote mountain fortress, in the hunt for the al Qaeda leader than was Iraqi Freedom, former Department of Defense and anticipation turned to frustration as bin possible while he remained on the run. This National Security Council Official, and author of Laden’s fate remained uncertain after 2 analysis is important, as the operational Wanted Dead or Alive: Manhunts from Geronimo to weeks of intense bombing, and frustration problems posed by strategic manhunts Bin Laden (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011). turned to recriminations when bin Laden remain relevant given the continued pursuit 40 JFQ / issue 70, 3 rd quarter 2013 ndupress.ndu.edu RUNKLE of Ayman al-Zawahiri and other al Qaeda Jawbreaker established a command center On December 16, numerous reports leaders, as well as the ongoing hunt for Lord’s in a schoolhouse in the foothills near Tora of genuine surrenders came into the school- Resistance Army commander Joseph Kony Bora. Satellite imagery and photographs house, and by the next day, the battle of Tora by U.S. special operations forces (SOF) and from reconnaissance planes showed deep Bora was over. Estimates of al Qaeda fighters our Ugandan allies. snow stacking up in the valleys and passes, killed ranged from 220 to 500, although the This article analyzes the failure to leading the team to conclude that bin Laden real number was likely higher as the bombing capture or kill bin Laden at Tora Bora in the would not be able to leave the mountains any literally obliterated or buried the bodies of context of the broader history of strategic time soon. Consequently, the plan for Tora large groups of fighters. Fifty-two fighters, manhunts. Starting with the 16-month Bora closely resembled the operations that mostly Arabs, were captured by the Afghans, Geronimo Campaign in 1885–1886, the had broken the Taliban lines north of Kabul: and another hundred were captured crossing United States has deployed forces abroad a CIA paramilitary operatives and U.S. SOF the border into Pakistan. Yet there was no dozen times with the operational objective would infiltrate the area to identify targets sign of the campaign’s target. Bin Laden’s fate of apprehending—dead or alive—one man. for bombing, which would clear the way for remained unknown until December 27, when The lessons learned from these historical Afghan militias to advance. However, the he appeared on videotape. Despite being campaigns offer a fuller perspective of the Northern Alliance had neither the capac- left-handed and typically gesturing with challenges posed by such operations, and ity nor the desire to push as far south as both hands while speaking, a visibly aged bin especially the hunt for bin Laden in Decem- Jalalabad. Consequently, team leader Gary Laden did not move his entire left side in the ber 2001. In particular, history suggests that Berntsen was forced to rely on local warlords. 34-minute video, suggesting he had sustained the number of troops deployed has little One was Hazaret Ali, a Pashai tribal leader a serious injury during the battle. effect on whether an individual is success- who had distinguished himself as a field “I am a poor slave of God,” he said fully targeted, and that the conventional commander in the war against the Soviets, resignedly. “If I live or die the war will con- wisdom that bin Laden escaped from Tora and the other was Haji Zaman, a recently tinue.”1 The hunt for bin Laden would last Bora because there were too few U.S. troops returned exile whose base of operations for almost another decade until it reached its present is a canard contradicted by 125 years during the anti-Soviet jihad had been Tora climax on a cloudless night in a quiet neigh- of strategic manhunts. Bora but who was a fierce rival of Ali’s. borhood in Abbottabad. U.S. Air Force (Jeremy T. Lock) T. (Jeremy U.S. Air Force By December 4, the first observation The Tora Bora Operation post was established on a mountaintop Not Enough Boots on the Ground? After the Taliban’s hold on Afghanistan overlooking the Milewa Valley, and over The most persistent criticism of the began to disintegrate in the face of the U.S. the next 3 days about 700,000 pounds of bin Laden manhunt as executed at Tora Bora air campaign and the Northern Alliance’s ordnance were dropped on al Qaeda posi- is that the Bush administration failed to ground assault in mid-November 2001, bin tions. On December 9, a 40-man detachment deploy enough U.S. troops and thereby let Laden and al Qaeda’s fighters fled southeast arrived at the base of Tora Bora. Under the bin Laden escape certain capture or death. from Jalalabad toward the Pakistan border. command of a major who would later publish On December 3, 2001, CIA team leader Their destination was Tora Bora (Pashto for a memoir under the pseudonym “Dalton Gary Berntsen sent a request to the agency’s “black dust”), a series of cave-filled valleys LESSONS FROM 125 YEARS OF in the White Mountains where ridgelines rose from wooded foothills to jagged, snow- history suggests that the number of troops deployed has little covered peaks separated by deep ravines. The effect on whether an individual is successfully targeted STRATEGIC MANHUNTS Tora Bora complex covered an area roughly 6 miles wide and 6 miles long and had withstood numerous Soviet offensives in the Fury,” the operators were supplemented headquarters asking to assault the cave com- By BENJAMIN RUNKLE 1980s. Moreover, bin Laden was intimately by 14 Green Berets, 6 operatives, a few Air plexes at Tora Bora and block escape routes. familiar with the terrain. In 1987, he used Force specialists, and a dozen British com- He also appealed directly to the head of U.S. bulldozers from his family’s construction mandos. The bombardment—which included Central Command (USCENTCOM) SOF company to build a road through the moun- over 1,000 precision-guided munitions and during a meeting in Kabul on December 15. tains and later fought his first battle against a 15,000-pound BLU-82 “Daisy Cutter” Similarly, Brigadier General James Mattis, the Soviets at the nearby village of Jaji. bomb—continued for another week, and on commander of the Marines in Afghanistan, During the years before September 11, bin at least two occasions directly targeted bin reportedly asked to send the 1,200 Marines Laden kept a house in a settlement near Tora Laden. Although SOF could hear the frantic, stationed near Kandahar into Tora Bora. But Bora and routinely led his children on hikes anguished cries of the al Qaeda operatives USCENTCOM denied all requests for more from Tora Bora into the Parachinar region via a captured radio, the Afghan militias troops. Consequently, as Peter Bergen con- of Pakistan that juts into Afghanistan on the withdrew each night from the ground cluded, “there were more American journal- southern slope of Tora Bora. Thus, Tora Bora gained during the day in order to break their ists at the battle of Tora Bora than there were afforded bin Laden the option of fighting Ramadan fast. Haji Zaman further compli- U.S. soldiers.”2 or fleeing. cated the siege by opening surrender negotia- USCENTCOM commanders cited Elements of the Central Intelligence tions with al Qaeda that were likely a stalling three broad arguments for why troop levels Agency (CIA) paramilitary team codenamed tactic for the terrorists to escape. were kept so low during the operation. First, ndupress.ndu.edu issue 70, 3 rd quarter 2013 / JFQ 41 COMMENTARY | Tora Bora Reconsidered former Deputy Commander of USCENT- was kept on the sidelines,” while “bin Laden insurgent leader Augusto Sandino noted, COM Lieutenant General Mike DeLong and an entourage of bodyguards walked “Large bodies of troops had not the mobil- argued, “The simple fact is, we couldn’t put unmolested out of Tora Bora and disappeared ity necessary to overtake bandit groups and a large number of our troops on the ground into Pakistan’s unregulated tribal area.”6 force them to decisive action.”10 The initial [at Tora Bora].”3 The roads from Jalalabad Bergen similarly concluded, “The Pentagon’s plan to capture Mohammad Farah Aideed to Tora Bora were horrible and ran through reluctance to commit more American boots in June 1993, codenamed Caustic Brimstone, villages loyal to the Taliban and al Qaeda, on the ground is a decision that historians called for a small force of 50 operators to be making the stealthy or efficient deployment are not likely to judge kindly.”7 Even former deployed to Mogadishu to capture the clan of large numbers of U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Air & Space Power Journal, September-October 2012, Volume
    September–October 2012 Volume 26, No. 5 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective Driving towards Success in the Air Force Cyber Mission ❙ 4 Leveraging Our Heritage to Shape Our Future Lt Gen David S. Fadok, USAF Dr. Richard A. Raines Features The Air Force’s Individual Mobilization Augmentee Program ❙ 12 Is the Current Organizational Structure Viable? Col Robin G. Sneed, USAFR Lt Col Robert A. Kilmer, PhD, USA, Retired An Evolution in Intelligence Doctrine ❙ 33 The Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Mission Type Order Capt Jaylan Michael Haley, USAF Joint Targeting and Air Support in Counterinsurgency ❙ 49 How to Move to Mission Command LTC Paul Darling, Alaska Army National Guard Building Partnership Capacity ❙ 65 Operation Harmattan and Beyond Col James H. Drape, USAF Departments 94 ❙ Ira C. Eaker Award Winners 95 ❙ Views An Airman’s Perspective on Mission Command . 95 Col Dale S. Shoupe, USAF, Retired Seeing It Coming: Revitalizing Future Studies in the US Air Force . 109 Col John F. Price Jr., USAF A Misapplied and Overextended Example: Gen J . N . Mattis’s Criticism of Effects-Based Operations . 118 Maj Dag Henriksen, PhD, Royal Norwegian Air Force Academy, US Air Force Research Institute 132 ❙ Historical Highlights Geopolitics versus Geologistics Lt. Col. Harry A. Sachaklian 146 ❙ Ricochets & Replies 154 ❙ Book Reviews Embry-Riddle at War: Aviation Training during World War II . 154 Stephen G. Craft Reviewer: R. Ray Ortensie A Fiery Peace in a Cold War: Bernard Schriever and the Ultimate Weapon . 157 Neil Sheehan Reviewer: Maj Thomas F. Menza, USAF, Retired Khobar Towers: Tragedy and Response . 160 Perry D. Jamieson Reviewer: CAPT Thomas B.
    [Show full text]
  • (FATA) of Pakistan: Conflict Management at State Level
    TIGAH,,, A JOURNAL OF PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT Volume: II, December 2012, FATA Research Centre, Islamabad Peacebuilding in FATA: Conflict Management at State Level Peacebuilding in Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) of Pakistan: Conflict Management at State Level Sharafat Ali Chaudhry ∗ & Mehran Ali Khan Wazir ! Abstract Studies focusing on violence in Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) conclude that the Russian aggression in 1979 towards Afghanistan, anarchy in post-soviet era, and US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 are the key reasons of spreading of violence in FATA. However, there is a controversy in views about the nature of violence in the bordering areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan. This paper empirically analyzes three dimensions of wide spread violence in the area. First, it maps the current research and views on the nature of violence in FATA. Second, it examines meta-theories of peacemaking and their relevance to the cultural, social and historical context of the tribal belt. Finally, this paper proposes the policy options for conflict management at the state level in Pakistan. Introduction The conflict in Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) has been explored to greater extent and the majority of studies conclude that the current violence in FATA has its roots within the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) invasion of Afghanistan which ended up in the Afghan civil war. Soviet invasion pulled the United States of America (USA) into this region. The US won the proxy war in Afghanistan against USSR ∗ Sharafat Ali Chaudhry, a development professional-turned-Lawyer, has been visiting faculty member at Department of P&IR at IIU, Islamabad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intelligence Community in Counterinsurgency
    The Intelligence Community in Counterinsurgency: Historical Lessons and Best Practices A Report of the Bush School of Government & Public Service for the RAND Corporation’s Intelligence Policy Center (IPC) The Intelligence Community in Andrew C. Albers Samuel G. Binkley Counterinsurgency: Mariam F. Chaudhry Historical Lessons and Kimberly Craswell Jordan S. Freeman Best Practices Carrie E. Lytle Tristan L. Myers Rami Naser Peter T. Sloan The recently updated counterinsurgency (COIN) doctrine for the U.S. Army (FM 3-24) includes a lengthy discussion of the role of intelligence in COIN, but does not give the U.S. intelligence community useful guidelines for operations.1 Instead, the field manual provides an all-inclusive laundry list of information to be collected without any useful guidance on priorities and methods. The manual acknowledges the crucial role of the intelligence community in COIN, but leaves out an actionable set of standards to guide its operations. To lay the groundwork for an intelligence doctrine, or a set of best practices, for COIN, this report reviews the literature on both the role of intelligence and how counterinsurgency operations are fought and won. We use this literature to create a framework outlining how For helpful comments on this project the authors would like to thank William Rosenau, Kathi Webb, Michael Spirtas, Michael Hix, Roger Molander, and the other RAND researchers who engaged the research team, as well as the faculty and students of the Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&M University. The authors would also like to thank John Parachini for his helpful suggestions, comments, and, especially, his generous support and sponsorship of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H4644
    H4644 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE June 21, 2004 GREENWOOD) came running up to me months he had in power before 9/11, Saudis or the Pakistanis or anyone else when he saw me and said, ‘‘How did you was, along with a few others, in a high to provide the leadership. It is up to know? How did you know?’’ Well, the level position to argue against, if not the people of the United States and our question is why did any of us not to change, the grotesquely mistaken leaders here to lead the way, and I have know? Why did we not know? Why did policies of the eighties and nineties, every confidence that our President those whom we have hired to protect but he failed to do so. In fact, we know will do and is doing just that. us not know? a few of the things that he did were ex- f It is time for those who made pos- actly in the wrong direction. sible the rise of the Taliban, the rise of If another 9/11 is to be avoided, we LEAVE OF ABSENCE bin Laden, and, yes, the tragedy of 9–11 need accountability. We do not need By unanimous consent, leave of ab- to be held personally accountable and the rearranging of a bureaucratic orga- sence was granted to: for us to understand the policies and nizational chart. There is nothing Mr. BECERRA (at the request of Ms. the people that caused 9–11. It was not wrong with our system that brought on PELOSI) for today on account of per- something that was ordained by God to 9/11, and there is nothing wrong with sonal reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Haqqani Network in Kurram the Regional Implications of a Growing Insurgency
    May 2011 The haQQani NetworK in KURR AM THE REGIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF A GROWING INSURGENCY Jeffrey Dressler & Reza Jan All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ©2011 by the Institute for the Study of War and AEI’s Critical Threats Project Cover image courtesy of Dr. Mohammad Taqi. the haqqani network in kurram The Regional Implications of a Growing Insurgency Jeffrey Dressler & Reza Jan A Report by the Institute for the Study of War and AEI’s Critical Threats Project ACKNOWLEDGEMENts This report would not have been possible without the help and hard work of numerous individuals. The authors would like to thank Alex Della Rocchetta and David Witter for their diligent research and critical support in the production of the report, Maggie Rackl for her patience and technical skill with graphics and design, and Marisa Sullivan and Maseh Zarif for their keen insight and editorial assistance. The authors would also like to thank Kim and Fred Kagan for their necessary inspiration and guidance. As always, credit belongs to many, but the contents of this report represent the views of the authors alone. taBLE OF CONTENts Introduction.....................................................................................1 Brief History of Kurram Agency............................................................1 The Mujahideen Years & Operation Enduring Freedom .............................. 2 Surge of Sectarianism in Kurram ...........................................................4 North Waziristan & The Search for New Sanctuary.....................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Taliban Fragmentation FACT, FICTION, and FUTURE by Andrew Watkins
    PEACEWORKS Taliban Fragmentation FACT, FICTION, AND FUTURE By Andrew Watkins NO. 160 | MARCH 2020 Making Peace Possible NO. 160 | MARCH 2020 ABOUT THE REPORT This report examines the phenomenon of insurgent fragmentation within Afghanistan’s Tali- ban and implications for the Afghan peace process. This study, which the author undertook PEACE PROCESSES as an independent researcher supported by the Asia Center at the US Institute of Peace, is based on a survey of the academic literature on insurgency, civil war, and negotiated peace, as well as on interviews the author conducted in Afghanistan in 2019 and 2020. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Andrew Watkins has worked in more than ten provinces of Afghanistan, most recently as a political affairs officer with the United Nations. He has also worked as an indepen- dent researcher, a conflict analyst and adviser to the humanitarian community, and a liaison based with Afghan security forces. Cover photo: A soldier walks among a group of alleged Taliban fighters at a National Directorate of Security facility in Faizabad in September 2019. The status of prisoners will be a critical issue in future negotiations with the Taliban. (Photo by Jim Huylebroek/New York Times) The views expressed in this report are those of the author alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Institute of Peace. An online edition of this and related reports can be found on our website (www.usip.org), together with additional information on the subject. © 2020 by the United States Institute of Peace United States Institute of Peace 2301 Constitution Avenue NW Washington, DC 20037 Phone: 202.457.1700 Fax: 202.429.6063 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.usip.org Peaceworks No.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles Al-Qaida and the Pakistani Harakat Movement: Reflections and Questions About the Pre-2001 Period by Don Rassler
    PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 11, Issue 6 Articles Al-Qaida and the Pakistani Harakat Movement: Reflections and Questions about the pre-2001 Period by Don Rassler Abstract There has been a modest amount of progress made over the last two decades in piecing together the developments that led to creation of al-Qaida and how the group has evolved over the last 30 years. Yet, there are still many dimensions of al-Qaida that remain understudied, and likely as a result, poorly understood. One major gap are the dynamics and relationships that have underpinned al-Qaida’s multi-decade presence in Pakistan. The lack of developed and foundational work done on the al-Qaida-Pakistan linkage is quite surprising given how long al- Qaida has been active in the country, the mix of geographic areas - from Pakistan’s tribal areas to its main cities - in which it has operated and found shelter, and the key roles Pakistani al-Qaida operatives have played in the group over the last two decades. To push the ball forward and advance understanding of this critical issue, this article examines what is known, and has been suggested, about al-Qaida’s relations with a cluster of Deobandi militant groups consisting of Harakat ul-Mujahidin, Harakat ul-Jihad Islami, Harakat ul-Ansar, and Jaish-e-Muhammad, which have been collectively described as Pakistan’s Harakat movement, prior to 9/11. It finds that each of these groups and their leaders provided key elements of support to al-Qaida in a number of direct and indirect ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Usama Bin Ladin's
    Usama bin Ladin’s “Father Sheikh”: Yunus Khalis and the Return of al-Qa`ida’s Leadership to Afghanistan Harmony Program Kevin Bell USAMA BIN LADIN’S “FATHER SHEIKH:” YUNUS KHALIS AND THE RETURN OF AL‐QA`IDA’S LEADERSHIP TO AFGHANISTAN THE COMBATING TERRORISM CENTER AT WEST POINT www.ctc.usma.edu 14 May 2013 The views expressed in this paper are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of the Combating Terrorism Center, the U.S. Military Academy, the Department of Defense or the U.S. government. Author’s Acknowledgments This report would not have been possible without the generosity and assistance of the director of the Harmony Research Program at the Combating Terrorism Center (CTC), Don Rassler. Mr. Rassler provided me with the support and encouragement to pursue this project, and his enthusiasm for the material always helped to lighten my load. I should state here that the first tentative steps on this line of inquiry were made during my time as a student at the Program in Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University. If not for professor Şükrü Hanioğlu’s open‐minded approach to directing my MA thesis, it is unlikely that I would have embarked on this investigation of Yunus Khalis. Professor Michael Reynolds also deserves great credit for his patience with this project as a member of my thesis committee. I must also extend my utmost appreciation to my reviewers—Carr Center Fellow Michael Semple, professor David Edwards and Vahid Brown—whose insightful comments, I believe, have led to a substantially improved and more thoughtful product.
    [Show full text]
  • Strange Victory: a Critical Appraisal of Operation Enduring Freedom and the Afghanistan War
    30 JANUARY 2002 RESEARCH MONOGRAPH #6 Strange Victory: A critical appraisal of Operation Enduring Freedom and the Afghanistan war Carl Conetta PROJECT ON DEFENSE ALTERNATIVES COMMONWEALTH INSTITUTE, CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS Contents Introduction 3 1. What has Operation Enduring Freedom accomplished? 4 1.1 The fruits of victory 4 1.1.1 Secondary goals 5 1.2 The costs of the war 6 1.2.1 The humanitarian cost of the war 7 1.2.2 Stability costs 7 2. Avoidable costs: the road not taken 9 3. War in search of a strategy 10 3.1 The Taliban become the target 10 3.2 Initial war strategy: split the Taliban 12 3.2.1 Romancing the Taliban 13 3.2.2 Pakistan: between the devil and the red, white, and blue 14 3.3 The first phase of the air campaign: a lever without a fulcrum 15 3.3.1 Strategic bombardment: alienating hearts and minds 15 3.4 A shift in strategy -- unleashing the dogs of war 17 4. A theater redefined 18 4.1 Reshuffling Afghanistan 19 4.2 Regional winners and losers 20 4.3 The structure of post-war Afghan instability 21 4.3.1 The Bonn agreement: nation-building or “cut and paste”? 22 4.3.2 Peacekeepers for Afghanistan: too little, too late 24 4.4 A new game: US and Afghan interests diverge 25 4.4.1 A failure to adjust 26 5. The tunnel at the end of the light 28 5.1 The path charted by Enduring Freedom 28 5.2 The triumph of expediency 29 5.3 The ascendancy of Defense 29 5.4 Realism redux 31 5.5 Bread and bombs 32 5.6 The fog of peace 34 Appendix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Produced by the Human Security Centre Lead Author
    1 Human Security Centre – Written evidence (AFG0019) Produced by the Human Security Centre Lead Author: Simon Schofield, Senior Fellow, In consultation with Rohullah Yakobi, Associate Fellow 2 1 Table of Contents 2. Executive Summary .............................................................................5 3. What is the Human Security Centre?.....................................................10 4. Geopolitics and National Interests and Agendas......................................11 Islamic Republic of Pakistan ...................................................................11 Historical Context...............................................................................11 Pakistan’s Strategy.............................................................................12 Support for the Taliban .......................................................................13 Afghanistan as a terrorist training camp ................................................16 Role of military aid .............................................................................17 Economic interests .............................................................................19 Conclusion – Pakistan .........................................................................19 Islamic Republic of Iran .........................................................................20 Historical context ...............................................................................20 Iranian Strategy ................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • The Coils of the Anaconda: America's
    THE COILS OF THE ANACONDA: AMERICA’S FIRST CONVENTIONAL BATTLE IN AFGHANISTAN BY C2009 Lester W. Grau Submitted to the graduate degree program in Military History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ____________________________ Dr. Theodore A Wilson, Chairperson ____________________________ Dr. James J. Willbanks, Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Robert F. Baumann, Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Maria Carlson, Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Jacob W. Kipp, Committee Member Date defended: April 27, 2009 The Dissertation Committee for Lester W. Grau certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: THE COILS OF THE ANACONDA: AMERICA’S FIRST CONVENTIONAL BATTLE IN AFGHANISTAN Committee: ____________________________ Dr. Theodore A Wilson, Chairperson ____________________________ Dr. James J. Willbanks, Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Robert F. Baumann, Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Maria Carlson, Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Jacob W. Kipp, Committee Member Date approved: April 27, 2009 ii PREFACE Generals have often been reproached with preparing for the last war instead of for the next–an easy gibe when their fellow-countrymen and their political leaders, too frequently, have prepared for no war at all. Preparation for war is an expensive, burdensome business, yet there is one important part of it that costs little–study. However changed and strange the new conditions of war may be, not only generals, but politicians and ordinary citizens, may find there is much to be learned from the past that can be applied to the future and, in their search for it, that some campaigns have more than others foreshadowed the coming pattern of modern war.1 — Field Marshall Viscount William Slim.
    [Show full text]