DOCSLIB.ORG

Plate Tectonics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Earth and space sciences Plate Tectonics Despite appearances, the continents are not frozen in place but are constantly moving across the globe, breaking apart and colliding in slow motion. The driving forces are enormous and to understand them you need to delve deep below the surface of the planet. This is a print version of an interactive online lesson. To sign up for the real thing or for curriculum details about the lesson go to www.cosmoslessons.com Introduction: Plate Tectonics Our knowledge of how the world works is changing all the time. Only 40 years ago, scientists thought that the Earth's crust was 啜xed in place like the skin of an orange, but all that changed in 1963 with a paper written by Fred Vine. His 啜ndings were nothing less than a revolution in thinking about the structure of our planet. Instead of being a solid skin, Vine said that the Earth’s surface was broken up like a jigsaw puzzle into large rigid slabs, called plates, that ꬃoated on the molten rocks and minerals that lay underneath. The incredible heat inside the planet made these plates constantly move, crash together, tear apart or grind past each other, Vine said. His theory is known as "plate tectonics". For the 啜rst time, this explained how great mountain ranges were formed and what caused earthquakes and created volcanoes. Scientists also discovered major ridges deep below the surface of the world's oceans where magma – molten rock from the Earth's interior – rises up through cracks in the ocean ꬃoor. When it hits the cold water the molten rock hardens, adding new material to the ocean ꬃoor. The two plates on either side of these ocean ridges slowly spread away from each other as though they're sitting on a conveyer belt, always on the move. The discovery also made scientists look again at the work of Alfred Wegener, a brilliant meteorologist and intrepid polar explorer. Back in 1915, he suggested that all the Earth's continents had once been joined together in a massive supercontinent called Pangaea. Because of plate tectonics, it gradually broke apart and the continents drifted to their current positions. But they didn't stop there and we now know that all the pieces of the puzzle are still on the move. Read the full Cosmos Magazine article here. Left: New ocean ꬃoor is continually being created from molten magma and moving away from the ridges like a slow-motion conveyer belt. Right: Meteorologist Alfred Wegener. 1 Question 1 Think: Do you have a mobile phone that uses GPS (Global Positioning System) to locate a speci啜c place? How will continental drift a訮ect the accuracy of the GPS? Type your ideas here about how GPS technology may be useful to, or be challenged by, continental drift. Suggest possible solutions to overcome any challenges identi啜ed. 2 Gather: Plate Tectonics 0:00 / 2:13 Credit: Continental Drift | 100 Greatest Discoveries by Science Channel (YouTube). 3 Question 1 Notes: Use this space to take notes for the video. Note: This is not a question and is optional, but we recommend taking notes – they will help you remember the main points of the video and also help if you need to come back to answer a question or review the lesson. Question 2 Identify: What is the name of the supercontinent that Alfred Wegener thought existed hundreds of millions of years ago? Question 3 Describe: List three di洅erent types of evidence that Wegener used to support his theory of continental drift and give a speci밄c example for each. Evidence Speci褅c example Question 4 Notes: Use this space to take notes for the video. Note: This is not a question and is optional. 0:00 / 0:21 Credit: Plate tectonics animation by alex1234715 (YouTube). 4 Question 5 De褅ne: Write a de밄nition of plate tectonics. Question 6 Identify: Which type of land formation is created when two land masses collide? The diagram to the right shows the Earth's tectonic plates and their directions of movement. Use it to answer the question below. Question 7 Draw: For each of the major tectonic plates named below, draw an arrow to indicate its direction of movement. 5 0:00 / 1:13 Credit: Earth – The Power of the Planet by BBC/Geo Dharma (YouTube). Question 8 Notes: Use this space to take notes for the video. Note: This is not a question and is optional. Question 9 Describe: Write a step by step process to describe how tectonic plates move. 6 Process: Plate Tectonics Above: The Himalayan mountains were formed as a result of the Indian Plate colliding with the Eurasian Plate. Question 1 Calculate: If the Indo-Australian plate is moving at 7 cm per year, how long will it take to move 50 m? 350 years 350,000 years 7 years 714 years I'm not sure Question 2 Analyze: Watch the following silent animation of continental drift. Choose a country and write a 26-second commentary for this video to describe the movement of your chosen country. In your commentary describe the rate of movement and the position of your chosen country relative to other countries and continents. Hint: A 26-second commentary is roughly equivalent to 60 words. 7 0:00 / 0:24 Credit: YouTube. Question 3 Notes: Use this space to take notes for the video. Note: This is not a question and is optional. Question 4 Predict: Suppose you add cold blue water and hot red water to the same container so that they can interact. What do you expect to happen to the two bodies of coloured water given the temperature di洅erence between them? Once you've made your prediction, watch the video below. 8 0:00 / 0:33 Credit: Water Density by Canada Science and Technology Museum (YouTube). Question 5 Notes: Use this space to take notes for the video. Note: This is not a question and is optional. Question 6 Explain: Did your prediction match what you observed in the video? If not, explain how it was di洅erent and suggest reasons for the di洅erences. Question 7 Compare: How does this experiment relate to the convection currents that cause the Earth's tectonic plates to move? What are the important di洅erences? Hint: Where is the source of heat in the case of the Earth and what happens to the hot magma as it rises up to the crust? 9 Project: Plate Tectonics Predicting a future map of the world The dinosaurs were the dominant species 100 million years ago. What will the dominant species be 100 million years from now? What will a map of the world look like in 100 million years? Where will Australia be? Where will the Americas be? Will there be any new major mountain ranges? How much bigger are the Himalayas going to be? 10 Question 1 Research: The following table summarizes the current motion of several major land masses (excluding Antarctica). The speeds are estimated averages relative to the African plate. Use this information to complete the table. You will then be able to make predictions about how a world map would look 100 million years from now. How fast is it Which land masses Land mass Which direction is it Which land masses moving? might it move away currently moving in? might it collide with? (cm/year) from? India northeast 3 Australia northeast 7 Africa stationary 0 North America west 2 South America west 3 Eurasia south 1.2 Question 2 Predict: Drag and drop the major land masses shown below to imagine how a map of the world might look 100 million years from now. Indicate the locations of collisions between continents by drawing red lines. 11 Question 3 Justify: Describe the major changes that you've predicted in your future map of the world and justify your predictions. Now sit back and enjoy this animation, which shows one model of how the modern continents evolved and how they might look in 100 million years. How closely do your predictions match the model? 0:00 / 3:18 Credit: Earth 100 Million Years From Now by SpaceRip (YouTube). Question 4 Notes: Use this space to take notes for the video. Note: This is not a question and is optional. 12 Career: Plate Tectonics Sonya Pemberton is a Melbourne-based lm-maker who combines a passion for science communication with a talent for lm-making. Her documentaries tackle complex, controversial scientiගc issues, but the main inspiration for her work is that facts can be beautiful. Sonya grew up in a family ගlled with curious minds and medical researchers. Her grandfather was an epidemiologist, her father specialized in providing medical care to newborn babies (neonatology), and her mother was a vivacious woman with a questing nature. When Sonya was growing up, her family encouraged her to think critically and it is perhaps this background that gives Sonya her talent for sniපng out the facts. Sonya has hundreds of hours of experience writing, directing and producing content for TV. These days she works for a company called Genepool Productions, which specializes in creating interesting science television programs. Some of the issues that Sonya has explored include cervical cancer, immunization, DNA and mental illness. She is currently hard at work on new shows about autism, breast cancer, and nuclear power. But making shows about science is not as straightforward as it may seem. Just imagine trying to make a ගlm about an organism that you can only see using a microscope! Sonya says that to be a documentary ගlm-maker you need to be able to convey complicated information and controversial ideas in a way that engages people.
Recommended publications
  • Dynamic Subsidence of Eastern Australia During the Cretaceous

    Dynamic Subsidence of Eastern Australia During the Cretaceous

    Gondwana Research 19 (2011) 372–383 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Gondwana Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gr Dynamic subsidence of Eastern Australia during the Cretaceous Kara J. Matthews a,⁎, Alina J. Hale a, Michael Gurnis b, R. Dietmar Müller a, Lydia DiCaprio a,c a EarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia b Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA c Now at: ExxonMobil Exploration Company, Houston, TX, USA article info abstract Article history: During the Early Cretaceous Australia's eastward passage over sinking subducted slabs induced widespread Received 16 February 2010 dynamic subsidence and formation of a large epeiric sea in the eastern interior. Despite evidence for Received in revised form 25 June 2010 convergence between Australia and the paleo-Pacific, the subduction zone location has been poorly Accepted 28 June 2010 constrained. Using coupled plate tectonic–mantle convection models, we test two end-member scenarios, Available online 13 July 2010 one with subduction directly east of Australia's reconstructed continental margin, and a second with subduction translated ~1000 km east, implying the existence of a back-arc basin. Our models incorporate a Keywords: Geodynamic modelling rheological model for the mantle and lithosphere, plate motions since 140 Ma and evolving plate boundaries. Subduction While mantle rheology affects the magnitude of surface vertical motions, timing of uplift and subsidence Australia depends on plate boundary geometries and kinematics. Computations with a proximal subduction zone Cretaceous result in accelerated basin subsidence occurring 20 Myr too early compared with tectonic subsidence Tectonic subsidence calculated from well data.
  • Overview of Zealandia and Its Subduction Record

    Overview of Zealandia and Its Subduction Record

    Overview of Zealandia and its subduction record Nick Mortimer, GNS Science, Dunedin, New Zealand GNS Science New Guinea SW Pacific geography Fiji New Caledonia Scattered, remote Australia islands Tasman 4 million people Sea New Near Australia Zealand 1000 km GNS Science SW Pacific bathymetry Fiji New Based on satellite Caledonia gravity Broad plateaus and ridges 1-2 km water depth New Zealand 1000 km Sandwell & Smith (1997), Stagpoole (2002) GNS Science SW Pacific 87 present day Fiji tectonics 77 New Caledonia 67 mm/yr • Pacific and Australian plates 53 • nearby pole of PAC plate rotation AUS plate New Zealand 38 • convergence variably oblique • subduction polarity 30 changes 1000 km Bird (2003) GNS Science OJP MP Zealandia • continent that is 95% submerged • rifted internally and on most margins 45-0 Ma 120-85 Ma • now on two plates PAC plate • Hikurangi Plateau adjacent AUS plate HP continental rock 85-55 Ma samples Median Batholith (Cambrian-Cret) Late Cret. MCCs 85-0 Ma Early Cret LIPs 45-0 Ma Preserved E Cret subduction zone 1000 km GNS Science Zealandia and Gondwana • ZLD on PAC and AUS plates PAC plate • match piercing points AUS plate HP • track fracture zones • rotation and translation 1000 km Sutherland (1995, 1999) GNS Science 1000 km 14 April 84,000,000 B.P. Gondwana reconstruction NG Just before major LP breakup episode MR QP KP Continental crust MP NewCal Oceanic crust NLHR AUST Hikurangi LIP SNR SLHR <85 Ma continental breakup D ZLND lines ET Chall STR IB HP Camp CR • Zealandia EANT WR was a ribbon continent WANT After Gaina et al.
  • USGS Analysis of the Australian UNCLOS Submission

    USGS Analysis of the Australian UNCLOS Submission

    USGS Analysis of the Australian UNCLOS Submission By Deborah R. Hutchinson and Robert W. Rowland Open-File Report 2006-1073 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia For Additional Information: See the United Nations web page on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea at http://www.un.org/Depts/los/index.htm, and the Executive Summary of the Australian UNCLOS submission at http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new?submission_files/submission_aus.htm. Contact Deborah R. Hutchinson U.S. Geological Survey 384 Woods Hole Road Woods Hole, MA, 02543 [email protected] 508-457-2263 Robert W. Rowland U.S. Geological Survey, Retired 55825 River Shore Lane Elkhart, IN 46516 [email protected] For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation Hutchinson, D.R., and Rowland, R.W., 2006, USGS Analysis of the Australian UNCLOS Submission: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1073, 19 p., http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1073. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government, nor does the interpretation presented here reflect official U.S.
  • Original Pdf Version

    Original Pdf Version

    Rhiana Elizabeth Henry Tectonic History Hildebrand Project 1A December 9th, 2016 North America subducted under Rubia Are there modern analogs for Hildebrand’s model of North America subducting under Rubia? In the Geological Society of America Special Papers “Did Westward Subduction Cause Cretaceous–Tertiary Orogeny in the North American Cordillera?” and “Mesozoic Assembly of the North American Cordillera” by Robert S. Hildebrand, the author argues that the North American continent experienced westward subduction under what he calls a “ribbon continent” known as Rubia around ~124Ma. This ribbon continent is composed of multiple terranes both known to be exotic to North America, and terranes that were previously thought to be part of North America. As the seaway between Rubia and North America closed, Hildebrand postulates that North America was dragged underneath with the oceanic crust. This continental material combined with the fluids from the margin caused great amounts of magmatism in the North American Cordillera. Eventually the continental crust broke due to upward buoyancy. This caused slab failure around 75-60 Ma, followed by a reversal of subduction polarity around 53 Ma, with eastward subduction through the mid- Tertiary (Fig. 1). As a way of checking to see if this hypothesis is plausible, I investigated modern geologic settings that are undergoing similar tectonic events. Although these regions are Figure 1: Hildebrand’s model of subduction of not perfect analogies, they share enough North America and Rubia. From Hildebrand, 2009. 1 Rhiana Elizabeth Henry Tectonic History Hildebrand Project 1A December 9th, 2016 tectonic features that Hildebrand’s model appears somewhat less outlandish.
  • Presentation on Pacific Plate and Associated Boundaries

    Presentation on Pacific Plate and Associated Boundaries

    PACIFIC PLATE AND ASSOCIATED BOUNDARIES The Pacific Plate • Pacific Plate is the largest plate and an oceanic plate. • It shares its boundaries with numerous plates namely; North American Plate.(Convergent and transform fault) Philippine Plate.(Convergent) Juan de Fuca Plate.(Convergent) Indo – Australian Plate.(Convergent, Transform Fault) Cocos Plate.(Divergent) Nazca Plate.(Divergent) Antarctic Plate.(Divergent,Transform Fault) Types of Plate Boundaries • Convergent Boundary: Subduction zones where two plates converges. Eg; Aleutian Islands(Alaska) • Divergent Boundary: Spreading centres where two plates move away from each other. Eg; East Pacific Rise (MOR, Pacific Ocean). • Transform Faults: Boundary where two plates slide past each other. For Eg. ; San Andreas Fault. BOUNDARY WITH ANTARCTIC PLATE DIVERGENT BOUNDARY • Pacific – Antarctic Ridge TRANSFORM FAULT • Louisville Seamount Chain Pacific – Antarctic Ridge Pacific – Antarctic Ridge(PAR) is located on the seafloor of the South Pacific Ocean. It is driven by the interaction of a mid oceanic ridge and deep mantle plumes located in the eastern portion of East Pacific Ridge. Louisville Seamount Chain It is the longest line of seamount chain in the Pacific Ocean of about 4,300 km, formed along the transform boundary in the western side between Pacific plate and Antarctic plate. It was formed from the Pacific Plate sliding over a long – lived centre of upwelling magma called the Louisville hotspot. BOUNDARY WITH PHILIPPINE PLATE CONVERGENT BOUNDARY • Izu – Ogasawara Trench • Mariana Trench Izu – Ogasawara Trench It is an oceanic trench in the western Pacific Ocean. It stretches from Japan to northern most section of Mariana Trench. Here, the Pacific Plate is being subducted beneath the Philippine Sea Plate.
  • Seismic Tomography Constraints on Reconstructing

    Seismic Tomography Constraints on Reconstructing

    SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY CONSTRAINTS ON RECONSTRUCTING THE PHILIPPINE SEA PLATE AND ITS MARGIN A Dissertation by LINA HANDAYANI Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2004 Major Subject: Geophysics SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY CONSTRAINTS ON RECONSTRUCTING THE PHILIPPINE SEA PLATE AND ITS MARGIN A Dissertation by LINA HANDAYANI Submitted to Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved as to style and content by: Thomas W. C. Hilde Mark E. Everett (Chair of Committee) (Member) Richard L. Gibson David W. Sparks (Member) (Member) William R. Bryant Richard L. Carlson (Member) (Head of Department) December 2004 Major Subject: Geophysics iii ABSTRACT Seismic Tomography Constraints on Reconstructing the Philippine Sea Plate and Its Margin. (December 2004) Lina Handayani, B.S., Institut Teknologi Bandung; M.S., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Thomas W.C. Hilde The Philippine Sea Plate has been surrounded by subduction zones throughout Cenozoic time due to the convergence of the Eurasian, Pacific and Indian-Australian plates. Existing Philippine Sea Plate reconstructions have been made based primarily on magnetic lineations produced by seafloor spreading, rock magnetism and geology of the Philippine Sea Plate. This dissertation employs seismic tomography model to constraint the reconstruction of the Philippine Sea Plate. Recent seismic tomography studies show the distribution of high velocity anomalies in the mantle of the Western Pacific, and that they represent subducted slabs. Using these recent tomography data, distribution maps of subducted slabs in the mantle beneath and surrounding the Philippine Sea Plate have been constructed which show that the mantle anomalies can be related to the various subduction zones bounding the Philippine Sea Plate.
  • Australia and Oceania: Physical Geography

    Australia and Oceania: Physical Geography

    R E S O U R C E L I B R A R Y E N C Y C L O P E D I C E N T RY Australia and Oceania: Physical Geography Encyclopedic entry. Oceania is a region made up of thousands of islands throughout the South Pacific Ocean. G R A D E S 6 - 12+ S U B J E C T S Biology, Earth Science, Geology, Geography, Human Geography, Physical Geography C O N T E N T S 10 Images For the complete encyclopedic entry with media resources, visit: http://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/oceania-physical-geography/ Oceania is a region made up of thousands of islands throughout the Central and South Pacific Ocean. It includes Australia, the smallest continent in terms of total land area. Most of Australia and Oceania is under the Pacific, a vast body of water that is larger than all the Earth’s continental landmasses and islands combined. The name “Oceania” justly establishes the Pacific Ocean as the defining characteristic of the continent. Oceania is dominated by the nation of Australia. The other two major landmasses of Oceania are the microcontinent of Zealandia, which includes the country of New Zealand, and the eastern half of the island of New Guinea, made up of the nation of Papua New Guinea. Oceania also includes three island regions: Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia (including the U.S. state of Hawaii). Oceania’s physical geography, environment and resources, and human geography can be considered separately. Oceania can be divided into three island groups: continental islands, high islands, and low islands.
  • Geodynamic Patterns of Ophiolites and Marginal Basins in the Indonesian and New Guinea Regions

    Geodynamic Patterns of Ophiolites and Marginal Basins in the Indonesian and New Guinea Regions

    Geodynamic patterns of ophiolites and marginal basins in the Indonesian and New Guinea regions RON HARRIS Department ofGeology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602-4606, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: Analysis of spatial, temporal, geological and geochemical patterns of ophiolites in the Indonesian and New Guinea region indicates a strong correlation with marginal basin development and closure. The spatial distribution of ophiolites is mostly linked with marginal basin producing zones of oblique convergence and collision. Strain partitioning in these zones creates a series of ephemeral plate boundaries between several independently moving lithospheric blocks. Repeated disruption of the diffuse boundaries between the blocks by changes in plate motion and collision-induced mantle extrusion creates space that is rapidly filled by new ocean basins in the upper plate of subduction zones. Suprasubduction zone (SSZ) spreading of these basins is enhanced by episodic extrusion of asthenosphere escaping collisional suture zones. Various closure events and global plate motion changes are reflected in the temporal distribution of marginal basin and ophiolite ages. Most ophiolite slabs in the Indonesian and New Guinea region represent fragments of oceanic lithosphere with a subduction zone component, as indicated by the common refractory petrochemistry of the mantle sequence and occurrence ofboninite. .Age and compositional heterogeneity may indicate that some ophiolite bodies are composite terranes. Collisions with buoyant lithosphere transfo= parts of these ocean basins into ophiolites. The connection between ophiolites and marginal basins is strongest where parts of actively spreading SSZ basins are partially represented as ophiolites in collision zones. Many of the various tectonic models proposed for rollback, subduction polarity asymmetry, astheno­ the origin and tectonic evolution of ophiolites are spheric flow and plate kinematics.
  • 38. Tectonic Constraints on the Hot-Spot Formation of Ninetyeast Ridge1

    38. Tectonic Constraints on the Hot-Spot Formation of Ninetyeast Ridge1

    Weissel, J., Peirce, J., Taylor, E., Alt, J., et al. 1991 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 121 38. TECTONIC CONSTRAINTS ON THE HOT-SPOT FORMATION OF NINETYEAST RIDGE1 Jean-Yves Royer,2 John W. Peirce,3 and Jeffrey K. Weissel4 ABSTRACT This paper examines the constraints on the tectonic setting of Ninetyeast Ridge, based on a compilation of bathymetric and magnetic data from the basins surrounding Ninetyeast Ridge in the Indian Ocean that includes the magnetic profiles collected under way during ODP Leg 121. Magnetic data in the Central Indian Basin demonstrate that the spreading center immediately west of Ninetyeast Ridge jumped to the south by a total amount of 11° between 68 and 46 Ma, implying that parts of the mirror image of Ninetyeast Ridge on the Antarctic plate were transferred onto the Indian plate. The obliquity of Ninetyeast Ridge relative to the fracture zone pattern and the occurrence of an Eocene extinct spreading axis in the Wharton Basin suggest that the northern part of Ninetyeast Ridge was emplaced by intraplate volcanism on the Indian plate, whereas the middle and southern parts of the ridge were emplaced along transform plate boundaries. The northward drift of the Indian plate over a single hot spot is the most plausible origin for Ninetyeast Ridge. Based on a recent kinematic model for the relative motions of the Indian, Antarctic, and Australian plates, we present a simple model that reconciles most of the available observations for Ninetyeast Ridge: Paleomagnetism, distribution of basement ages, geochemistry, and geometry. In addition, the model predicts a slow westward migration of the Kerguelen/Ninetyeast hot spot with respect to the Antarctic and Australian plates between the Late Cretaceous and early Oligocene (84 to 36 Ma).
  • Analysis of Intraplate Earthquakes and Deformation in the Indo-Australian Plate: Moment Tensor and Focal Depth Modeling

    Analysis of Intraplate Earthquakes and Deformation in the Indo-Australian Plate: Moment Tensor and Focal Depth Modeling

    Analysis of Intraplate Earthquakes and Deformation in the Indo-Australian Plate: Moment Tensor and Focal Depth Modeling Honor’s Thesis by Wardah Mohammad Fadil Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Michigan Abstract The April 2012 sequence of MW > 8.0 strike-slip earthquakes off the northern coast of Sumatra ​ ​ and the May 2014 ~50 km deep earthquake in the Bay of Bengal are rare intraplate earthquakes that have sparked numerous studies on internal deformation of the Indo-Australian Plate. In this thesis, we conducted moment tensor analysis and observed the NW/SE pattern of compression in the southern Indian Ocean, perpendicular to the compression directions at the Sunda Trench. We estimated principal stress directions for a cluster of 55 intraplate earthquakes in the southern Indian Ocean, demonstrating that they are consistent with the general stress directions in the region. Analysis of depth phase arrival times and surface wave dispersion for the May 21 2014 Bay of Bengal earthquake at the BJT and PALK seismic stations confirmed the 40-60 km focal depth of the earthquake. The occurrence of intraplate earthquakes and orientation of stress within the Indo-Australian Plate indicate the complex and dynamic plate boundary forces and the formation of a diffuse deformation zone. However, the causes of deep focal depths of intraplate earthquakes are still ambiguous. 1. Introduction The Indo-Australian Plate is a unique tectonic plate. It includes the continents of India and Australia and the surrounding oceanic lithosphere. The plate formed approximately 42 million years ago when the Indian and Australian plates fused together [Royer et al, 1991; Cande and Kent, 1995; Krishna et al, 1995].
  • Tectonic Controls on the Distribution of Large Copper and Gold Deposits in Southeast Asia to Identify Productive and Non-Productive Structures

    Tectonic Controls on the Distribution of Large Copper and Gold Deposits in Southeast Asia to Identify Productive and Non-Productive Structures

    Tectonic controls on the distribution of large copper and gold deposits in Southeast Asia to identify productive and non-productive structures Bert De Waele, Peter Williams, Gavin Chan SRK Consulting, 10, Richardson Street, West Perth, WA6005, Western Australia Abstract. Ore deposits occur in a wide range of tectonic the east, however, on Sumbawa, several porphyry settings, and are highly variable in their local systems are known, of which the largest is the 5 Million characteristics. In this paper, we focus on the distribution year-old Batu Hijau deposit. Tectonics in that region, of copper and gold deposits in the Southeast Asia region, east of longitude 115°E, consists of the consumption of and investigate large-scale plate-tectonic controls on the the IP below the remnants of the Molucca Sea Plate distribution and characteristics of these porphyry copper and epithermal gold deposits. We then discuss the (MSP), i.e intra-oceanic subduction and the formation of applicability of these results to exploration in older island arcs. geological terranes, and suggest clues to distinguishing In Northern Indonesia, dextral escape tectonics productive from non-productive geological structures. related to India-Asia collision resulted in the southward subduction of the proto-South China Sea Plate (PSCSP) Keywords: Porphyry Copper-Gold, Tectonics below Borneo. This subduction ceased at about 24 Ma, with continent-continent collision and accretion of the 1 Tectonics and mineralisation in SE Asia sedimentary prism to northern Borneo. The cessation of subduction changed motion of the PSP, and collision of Southeast Asia is a collage of ophiolitic, island and the AP with the Sunda Arc resulted in counter clockwise oceanic arc terranes that formed as part of a complex rotation of Borneo.
  • Australian Paleo-Stress Fields and Tectonic Reactivation Over the Past

    Australian Paleo-Stress Fields and Tectonic Reactivation Over the Past

    padmavathym 27/7/11 12:32 TAJE_A_605801 (XML) Australian Journal of Earth Sciences (2011) 00, (1–16) Australian paleo-stress fields and tectonic reactivation 5 over the past 100 Myr 65 R. D. MU¨LLER1*, S. DYKSTERHUIS1,2 AND P. REY1 10 1EarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Madsen Building F09, NSW 2006, Australia. 70 2ExxonMobil, 12 Riverside Quay, Southbank, VIC 3006, Australia. Even though a multitude of observations suggest time-dependent regional tectonic reactivation of the 15 Australian Plate, its large-scale intraplate stress field evolution remains largely unexplored. This arises 75 because intraplate paleo-stress models are difficult to construct, and that observations of tectonic reactivation are often hard to date. However, because the Australian plate has undergone significant changes in plate boundary types and geometries since the Cretaceous, we argue that even simple models can provide some insights into the nature and timing of crustal reactivation through time. We present Australian intraplate stress models for key times from the Early Cretaceous to the present, and 20 link them to geological observations for evaluating time-dependent fault reactivation. We focus on the 80 effect time-dependent geometries of mid-ocean ridges, subduction zones and collisional plate boundaries around Australia have on basin evolution and fault reactivation through time by reconstructing tectonic plates, restoring plate boundary configurations, and modelling the effect of selected time-dependent plate driving forces on the intraplate stress field of a rheologically 25 heterogeneous plate. We compare mapped fault reactivation histories with paleo-stress models via 85 time-dependent fault slip tendency analysis employing Coulomb-Navier criteria to determine the likelihood of strain in a body of rock being accommodated by sliding along pre-existing planes of weakness.