DOCSLIB.ORG

KCC US Hurricane Reference Model Version 3.0 Riskinsight® 4.10.3.129

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KCC US Hurricane Reference Model Version 3.0 Riskinsight® 4.10.3.129 KCC US Hurricane Reference Model Version 3.0 RiskInsight® 4.10.3.129 Submitted in compliance with the 2019 Standards of the Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology MAY 3, 2021 Provided to Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology Copyright ©2021 Karen Clark & Company. All rights reserved. This document may not be reproduced, in whole or part, or transmitted in any form without the express written consent of Karen Clark & Company. Trademarks RiskInsight and WindfieldBuilder are registered trademarks of Karen Clark & Company. KCC US Hurricane Reference Model Version 3.0 – FCHLPM Submission 5/3/2021 4:18 PM Page 2 ©2021 Karen Clark & Company Provided to Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology KCC US Hurricane Reference Model Version 3.0 – FCHLPM Submission 5/3/2021 4:18 PM Page 3 ©2021 Karen Clark & Company Provided to Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology Hurricane Model Identification Name of Hurricane Model: KCC US Hurricane Reference Model Hurricane Model Version Identification: 3.0 Hurricane Model Platform Names and Identifications with primary Hurricane Model Platform and Identification RiskInsight® 4.10.3.129 (Primary Platform) Designated: Interim Hurricane Model Update Version Identification: Interim Data Update Designation: Name of Modeling Organization: Karen Clark & Company Street Address: 116 Huntington Avenue City, State, ZIP Code: Boston, MA 02116 Mailing Address, if different from above: Same as Above Contact Person: Glen Daraskevich Phone Number: 617.423.2800 Fax Number: 617.423.2808 E-mail Address: [email protected] Date: May 3, 2021 KCC US Hurricane Reference Model Version 3.0 – FCHLPM Submission 5/3/2021 4:18 PM Page 4 ©2021 Karen Clark & Company Provided to Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology Description of Trade Secret Information The following items are trade secret information and will be presented to the Commission during the closed meeting and to the Professional Team during the onsite visit: ▪ Form V-3 ▪ Form V-5 ▪ Form A-6 ▪ Additional information regarding the handling of client insurer claims data KCC US Hurricane Reference Model Version 3.0 – FCHLPM Submission 5/3/2021 4:18 PM Page 5 ©2021 Karen Clark & Company Provided to Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology List of Contents General Standards....................................................................................................................................... 14 G-1 Scope of the Hurricane Model and Its Implementation ............................................................. 14 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 15 G-2 Qualifications of Modeling Organization Personnel and Consultants Engaged in Development of the Hurricane Model ........................................................................................................................... 40 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 40 G-3 Insured Exposure Location .......................................................................................................... 53 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 53 G-4 Independence of Hurricane Model Components ....................................................................... 56 G-5 Editorial Compliance ................................................................................................................... 57 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 57 Meteorological Standards ........................................................................................................................... 58 M-1 Base Hurricane Storm Set ........................................................................................................... 58 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 58 M-2 Hurricane Parameters and Characteristics ................................................................................. 59 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 59 M-3 Hurricane Probability Distributions ............................................................................................. 64 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 64 M-4 Hurricane Windfield Structure .................................................................................................... 67 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 67 M-5 Hurricane Landfall and Over-Land Weakening Methodologies .................................................. 73 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 73 M-6 Logical Relationships of Hurricane Characteristics ..................................................................... 75 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 75 Statistical Standards .................................................................................................................................... 77 S-1 Modeled Results and Goodness-of-Fit ........................................................................................ 77 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 77 S-2 Sensitivity Analysis for Hurricane Model Output ........................................................................ 83 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 83 S-3 Uncertainty Analysis for Hurricane Model Output ..................................................................... 86 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 86 S-4 County Level Aggregation ........................................................................................................... 89 KCC US Hurricane Reference Model Version 3.0 – FCHLPM Submission 5/3/2021 4:18 PM Page 6 ©2021 Karen Clark & Company Provided to Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology Disclosure ............................................................................................................................................ 89 S-5 Replication of Known Hurricane Losses ...................................................................................... 92 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 92 S-6 Comparison of Projected Hurricane Loss Costs .......................................................................... 95 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 95 Vulnerability Standards ............................................................................................................................... 97 V-1 Derivation of Building Hurricane Vulnerability Functions ........................................................... 97 Disclosures .......................................................................................................................................... 98 V-2 Derivation of Contents Hurricane Vulnerability Functions ....................................................... 107 Disclosures ........................................................................................................................................ 107 V-3 Derivation of Time Element Hurricane Vulnerability Functions ............................................... 110 Disclosures ........................................................................................................................................ 110 V-4 Hurricane Mitigation Measures and Secondary Characteristics ............................................... 113 Disclosures ........................................................................................................................................ 114 Actuarial Standards ................................................................................................................................... 122 A-1 Hurricane Model Input Data and Output Reports .................................................................... 122 Disclosures ........................................................................................................................................ 122 A-2 Hurricane Events Resulting in Modeled Hurricane Losses.......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dr. C#: a Pedagogic IDE for C# Featuring a Read-Eval-Print-Loop by Dennis Lu
    RICE UNIVERSITY Dr. C#: A Pedagogic IDE for C# Featuring a Read-Eval-Print-Loop by Dennis Lu ATHESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE Master of Science APPROVED,THESIS COMMITTEE: Robert Cartwright, Chair Professor of Computer Science Joe Warren Professor of Computer Science Dan Wallach Assistant Professor of Computer Science Dung X. Nguyen Lecturer, Computer Science Houston, Texas April, 2003 Dr. C#: A Pedagogic IDE for C# Featuring a Read-Eval-Print-Loop Dennis Lu Abstract As the primary programming language of the Microsoft .NET platform, C# will play a significant role in software development for the foreseeable future. As the language rapidly gains popularity in industry, tools made for C# development fo- cus on the professional programmer, while leaving the beginning computer science student behind. To address this problem, we introduce Dr. C#, a simple lightweight develop- ment environment with an integrated, interactive Read-Eval-Print-Loop (REPL). Dr. C# helps flatten the learning curve of both the environment and the language, enabling students to quickly learn key elements of the language and focus more easily on concepts. Dr. C# thus serves not only as a learning tool for beginner students but also as a teaching tool for instructors. The editor is based on an open source IDE called SharpDevelop. This thesis describes the implementation of Dr. C# focusing primarily on building the REPL and integrating with SharpDevelop. Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor Professor Robert “Corky” Cartwright for giving me the opportunity and autonomy to develop Dr. C#. I would also like to thank Professor Dung Nguyen for acting as co-advisor and for his years of guidance and support.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Forecasting and Mapping System of Storm Surge and Coastal Flooding
    AUGUST 2020 Y A N G E T A L . 1663 A Rapid Forecasting and Mapping System of Storm Surge and Coastal Flooding KUN YANG,VLADIMIR A. PARAMYGIN, AND Y. PETER SHENG Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (Manuscript received 16 July 2019, in final form 2 March 2020) ABSTRACT A prototype of an efficient and accurate rapid forecasting and mapping system (RFMS) of storm surge is presented. Given a storm advisory from the National Hurricane Center, the RFMS can generate a coastal inundation map on a high-resolution grid in 1 min (reference system Intel Core i7–3770K). The foundation of the RFMS is a storm surge database consisting of high-resolution simulations of 490 optimal storms generated by a robust storm surge modeling system, Curvilinear-Grid Hydrodynamics in 3D (CH3D-SSMS). The RFMS uses an efficient quick kriging interpolation scheme to interpolate the surge response from the storm surge database, which considers tens of thousands of combinations of five landfall parameters of storms: central pressure deficit, radius to maximum wind, forward speed, heading direction, and landfall location. The RFMS is applied to southwest Florida using data from Hurricane Charley in 2004 and Hurricane Irma in 2017, and to the Florida Panhandle using data from Hurricane Michael in 2018 and validated with observed high water mark data. The RFMS results agree well with observation and direct simulation of the high-resolution CH3D- SSMS. The RFMS can be used for real-time forecasting during a hurricane or ‘‘what-if’’ scenarios for miti- gation planning and preparedness training, or to produce a probabilistic flood map.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific Ab Sins Nicholas S
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School March 2019 Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific aB sins Nicholas S. Grondin Louisiana State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Climate Commons, Meteorology Commons, and the Physical and Environmental Geography Commons Recommended Citation Grondin, Nicholas S., "Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific asinB s" (2019). LSU Master's Theses. 4864. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/4864 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLIMATOLOGY, VARIABILITY, AND RETURN PERIODS OF TROPICAL CYCLONE STRIKES IN THE NORTHEASTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC BASINS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by Nicholas S. Grondin B.S. Meteorology, University of South Alabama, 2016 May 2019 Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my family, especially mom, Mim and Pop, for their love and encouragement every step of the way. This thesis is dedicated to my friends and fraternity brothers, especially Dillon, Sarah, Clay, and Courtney, for their friendship and support. This thesis is dedicated to all of my teachers and college professors, especially Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Click Here to Download the 2013 Winners Book
    The prestigious Construction Marketing Awards are highly regarded as a measure of excellence in construction marketing and business development. Now in its 13th year the awards, organised by The Chartered Institute of Marketing Construction Industry Group (CIMCIG), are an invaluable opportunity for recognition; a way to showcase creativity, innovation and effectiveness in your company’s marketing and/or business development strategy. The CMAs raise the profile of marketing professionals and their achievements. Being shortlisted is a statement of your organisations achievement. Winner or Highly Commended is evidence of your achievement via the display of an award logo and award trophy. The winners are outlined in the following pages and our congratulations go to the teams involved. “Last year’s Construction Marketing Awards were possibly the best that we had seen in their 12 year history and set a benchmark for this year that would be very hard to match, let along beat. It is with this in mind that I am proud to say that the, number, range and quality of entries in the 2013 Construction Marketing Awards achieved that and made the judging process particularly difficult, whilst enjoyable. Our winners have demonstrated that clear objective setting, diligent planning and relevant execution delivers results. So yet again we have been presented with some excellent work and some fantastic case studies where companies within our industry are using the profession of marketing to lead the business to more profitable times. In so doing, the Construction Marketing Awards 2013 have raised the bar even higher for 2014. CIMCIG is proud to run these Awards and delighted to present this summary of the winning campaigns.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report Annual 2019
    a force for good. 2019 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2019 1, cours Ferdinand de Lesseps 92851 Rueil Malmaison Cedex – France Tel.: +33 1 47 16 35 00 Fax: +33 1 47 51 91 02 www.vinci.com VINCI.Group 2019 ANNUAL REPORT VINCI @VINCI CONTENTS 1 P r o l e 2 Album 10 Interview with the Chairman and CEO 12 Corporate governance 14 Direction and strategy 18 Stock market and shareholder base 22 Sustainable development 32 CONCESSIONS 34 VINCI Autoroutes 48 VINCI Airports 62 Other concessions 64 – VINCI Highways 68 – VINCI Railways 70 – VINCI Stadium 72 CONTRACTING 74 VINCI Energies 88 Eurovia 102 VINCI Construction 118 VINCI Immobilier 121 GENERAL & FINANCIAL ELEMENTS 122 Report of the Board of Directors 270 Report of the Lead Director and the Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors 272 Consolidated nancial statements This universal registration document was filed on 2 March 2020 with the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF, the French securities regulator), as competent authority 349 Parent company nancial statements under Regulation (EU) 2017/1129, without prior approval pursuant to Article 9 of the 367 Special report of the Statutory Auditors on said regulation. The universal registration document may be used for the purposes of an offer to the regulated agreements public of securities or the admission of securities to trading on a regulated market if accompanied by a prospectus or securities note as well as a summary of all 368 Persons responsible for the universal registration document amendments, if any, made to the universal registration document. The set of documents thus formed is approved by the AMF in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1129.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2017
    Southernmost Weather Reporter National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office Key West, FL Southernmost Weather Reporter National Weather Service ~ Key West, FL Welcome to 2017 Winter Report F E B 2 0 1 7 Inside this Report: e would like to welcome you to the second edition of the “Southernmost Weather Reporter” from the Florida Keys National Weather Service Welcome 1 (NWS). In this newsletter you will find information about some of the Hurricane Tabletop W 2 most important office events that have occurred since our first edition was released Exercise in May 2016. The tropics were active in 2016, with Tropical Depression #9 (the storm Skywarn Training 3 that would eventually become Hurricane Hermine) forming over the Florida Keys DSS aboard NOAA coastal waters in late August, and Hurricane Matthew threatening the Keys in early 4-5 Ship Nancy Foster October before it eventually impacted the east coast of Florida and the Carolinas. We were “all hands on deck” for these two events, conducting numerous briefings, NWS Ambassador 6 working closely with our core Federal, state, and local partners, and launching Program special upper air releases every six hours. Our office participated in what was a first Aviation Workshop 6 for the NWS: a long-term deployment on board a NOAA research vessel to provide decision support. Meteorologists Chip Kasper and Chris Rothwell each joined the Weather Kiosk 7 science team aboard the NOAA Ship Nancy Foster for an expedition in the coastal US Coast Guard Cutter 8 waters of the Florida Keys in August. The NOAA-led research team conducted scuba Visits operations and undertook a variety of research tasks, collecting data necessary to 2016 Hurricane Sea- 9 inform management decisions within the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms
    FLORIDA HURRICANES AND TROPICAL STORMS 1871-1995: An Historical Survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams '+wcCopy~~ I~BN 0-912747-08-0 Florida SeaGrant College is supported by award of the Office of Sea Grant, NationalOceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce,grant number NA 36RG-0070, under provisions of the NationalSea Grant College and Programs Act of 1966. This information is published by the Sea Grant Extension Program which functionsas a coinponentof the Florida Cooperative Extension Service, John T. Woeste, Dean, in conducting Cooperative Extensionwork in Agriculture, Home Economics, and Marine Sciences,State of Florida, U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, U.S. Departmentof Commerce, and Boards of County Commissioners, cooperating.Printed and distributed in furtherance af the Actsof Congressof May 8 andJune 14, 1914.The Florida Sea Grant Collegeis an Equal Opportunity-AffirmativeAction employer authorizedto provide research, educational information and other servicesonly to individuals and institutions that function without regardto race,color, sex, age,handicap or nationalorigin. Coverphoto: Hank Brandli & Rob Downey LOANCOPY ONLY Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms 1871-1995: An Historical survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams Division of Marine and Environmental Systems, Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, FL 32901 Technical Paper - 71 June 1994 $5.00 Copies may be obtained from: Florida Sea Grant College Program University of Florida Building 803 P.O. Box 110409 Gainesville, FL 32611-0409 904-392-2801 II Our friend andcolleague, Fred Doehringpictured below, died on January 5, 1993, before this manuscript was completed. Until his death, Fred had spent the last 18 months painstakingly researchingdata for this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Modification Although Experts in the Meteorological Field Aren’T Enthusiastic About These Ideas Due to the Inconclusive Results from Project Stormfury
    Solving Today’s Hurricane Problem Through Modification Submitted by: Greg Machos Webmaster/Owner www.hurricaneville.com Submitted to: Dr. Stephan Nelson Director of Atmospheric Science National Science Foundation Room 775 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA 22230 April 27, 2001 Final Proposal for Business and Professional Writing If found, please return to: Mark Waren Department of English Murray Hall, Room 032 College Avenue Campus, Rutgers University i ABSTRACT This proposal is for a research study that will attempt to combine the best elements of both the federal government and private industry projects on hurricane intensification and modification. There will be a difference in the way a hurricane will be attacked. Rather than trying to attack it through seeding its inner core, this proposal will try to use wind shear at the upper levels to destroy the storm’s vertical structure. Past research has shown that work in this area of study has had positive impacts on hurricane forecasting that ultimately saved lives. Furthermore, technology has improved significantly over the last twenty years and with the tremendous strides made in weather forecasting over the past century, now may be a great time to revisit this kind of research again. Coastal communities in the eastern half of the United States as well as many underdeveloped countries in the Caribbean and Central America are more vulnerable than ever to a major hurricane like Hurricane Andrew in 1992 or Hurricane Mitch in 1998. Hurricane Andrew caused approximately $27 billion dollars in damage after making landfall in South Florida while Hurricane Mitch left an estimated 11,000 people dead from heavy rains over a period of several days.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphologic Recovery of North Captiva Island from the Landfall of Hurricane Charley in 2004
    geosciences Article Geomorphologic Recovery of North Captiva Island from the Landfall of Hurricane Charley in 2004 Emma Wilson Kelly and Felix Jose * Department of Marine & Earth Sciences, The Water School, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL 33965, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Hurricane Charley made landfall on the Gulf Coast of Florida on 13 August 2004 as a category 4 hurricane, devastating North Captiva Island. The hurricane caused a breach to occur to the southern end of the island, which naturally healed itself over the course of three years. By 2008, the cut was completely repaired geomorphologically. LiDAR data analysis shows the northern half of the island has been subjected to persistent erosion from 1998–2018, while the southern half experienced accretion since 2004, including the complete closure of the “Charley cut”. The maxi- mum volume of sediment erosion in the northern sector of the island (R71–R73) from 2004–2018 was −85,710.1 m3, which was the source of southern accretion. The breached area of the island (R78b–R79a) obtained 500,163.9 m3 of sediments from 2004–2018 to heal the cut made by Hurricane Charley. Along with LiDAR data analysis, Google Earth Pro historical imageries and SANDS volu- metric analysis confirmed the longshore transport of sediments from the northern to the southern end of the island. Winter storms are mainly responsible for this southerly longshore transport and are hypothesized to be the main factor driving the coastal dynamics that restored the breach and Citation: Kelly, E.W.; Jose, F. helps in widening the southern end of North Captiva Island.
    [Show full text]
  • FES Presentation Hurricane Michael FES Annual Meeting 2019 Mark Fuller, P.E
    FES Presentation Hurricane Michael FES Annual Meeting 2019 Mark Fuller, P.E. CFM City of Tallahassee Hurricane Michael October 7-11, 2018 x-Albany, GA Mexico Beach, FL- x x- Tallahassee, FL Mexico Beach & Blountstown High School- Florida Direct Hit- Hurricane Michael 2018 October 7-11 2018 Michael was a category 5 hurricane (on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale) that Hurricane Michael made a catastrophic landfall near Mexico Beach and Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, producing devastating winds and storm surge near the coast, and rain and wind inland. It was directly responsible for 16 deaths and about $25 billion in damage in the United States. Before hitting the United States, the cyclone brought hurricane-force winds to the western tip of Cuba when it was a category 2 hurricane. X- Albany, Ga. Mexico Beach-x x- Tallahassee 10/ 8 /1 8 10:30 a.m. Monday 1. Briefings daily 10:30a and 4:00p. 2. 10:30am Morning Briefing - at 11am the storm officially became Hurricane Michael in the southern Gulf of Mexico region. They expect it to hit landfall late 10/10/18 Wednesday morning or Wednesday night. Late Tuesday 10/9/18 evening we may feel winds up to Tropical Storm level. The storm is currently headed North to Northwest with the expectation that it will turn to the Northeast. The potential is that Hurricane Michael could turn into a category 3 which means 120 mph winds. The next update call is 4:30p. 3. 4:30p Afternoon Briefing- storm strengthening, current CAT 1 (Sustained winds 74mph) can go CAT 3 (120 mph winds), expected land fall on panhandle, Tues.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Unit Testing
    INTRODUCTION TO UNIT TESTING In C#, you can think of a unit as a method. You thus write a unit test by writing something that tests a method. For example, let’s say that we had the aforementioned Calculator class and that it contained an Add(int, int) method. Let’s say that you want to write some code to test that method. public class CalculatorTester { public void TestAdd() { var calculator = new Calculator(); if (calculator.Add(2, 2) == 4) Console.WriteLine("Success"); else Console.WriteLine("Failure"); } } Let’s take a look now at what some code written for an actual unit test framework (MS Test) looks like. [TestClass] public class CalculatorTests { [TestMethod] public void TestMethod1() { var calculator = new Calculator(); Assert.AreEqual(4, calculator.Add(2, 2)); } } Notice the attributes, TestClass and TestMethod. Those exist simply to tell the unit test framework to pay attention to them when executing the unit test suite. When you want to get results, you invoke the unit test runner, and it executes all methods decorated like this, compiling the results into a visually pleasing report that you can view. Let’s take a look at your top 3 unit test framework options for C#. MSTest/Visual Studio MSTest was actually the name of a command line tool for executing tests, MSTest ships with Visual Studio, so you have it right out of the box, in your IDE, without doing anything. With MSTest, getting that setup is as easy as File->New Project. Then, when you write a test, you can right click on it and execute, having your result displayed in the IDE One of the most frequent knocks on MSTest is that of performance.
    [Show full text]