85 84 Utah Geological Survey Western States Seismic Policy Council Pmceedings CONTRASTS BETWEEN SHORT- AND LONG-TERM RECORDS OF SEISMICITY cally <1-2 mm/year; thus, recunence intervals for surface rupturing fault are as little as several thousand years (e.g., IN THE RIO GRANDE RIFT-IMPORTANT IMPLICATIONS FOR SEISMIC the Wasatch fault zone) or as long as 10,000 years (e.g., a N ----1 typical Basin and Range fault) t I 00,000 years (e.g., HAZARD ASSESSMENTS IN AREAS OF SLOW EXTENSION Denver ome of the least active Quaternary fau lts in the Rio Grande rift). Obviously, the 150- to 300-year-long record :~ Colorado Michael N. Machette of felt seismicity only portrays a small fraction of the '\ I\ U.S. Geological Survey, MS 966 potentially active faults in these regions. I \ GP I I Geologic Hazards Team-Central Region I I I Finally, in even le s tectonically active regions, such CP SRM' ' ' Denver, Colorado 80225 as the pa i.ve margin of the ea tern U.S. and compres --r -~ -- l~ (
[email protected]) sional domain of the stable continental interior of the , ~Taos i-- U.S., Canada, and Australia, fault slip rates are probably J- Los', ( 1 measured in hundredths of a mm/year, and intervals be Alamo~'• :Santa Fe I ABSTRACT tween surface rupturing events may be extremely long \ Arizona : , ~J 1 ., Albuquerque (>100,000 years) or immeasurable. However, these re I f,C~ \ I I I The Rio Grand rift ha a relatively hort and unimpres iv record of hi toricaJ eisouc1ty.