Women's Preventive Services Initiative (WPSI) 2021 Coding Guide Contraception WPSI CODING GUIDE 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sterilization and Abortion Policy Billing Instructions
Sterilization and Abortion Policy Billing Instructions Table of contents Table of contents ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Hysterectomy ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgement forms ..................................................................................................................... 2 Prior authorization requirements ......................................................................................................... 2 Covered services ................................................................................................................................... 2 Intrauterine Devices and Subdermal Implants ......................................................................................... 4 Family planning: sterilization .................................................................................................................... 4 Prior authorization requirements ......................................................................................................... 5 Covered services ................................................................................................................................... 5 Abortion .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Claim -
Patch Development with New Drugs Versus Generic Development – Principles and Methods
Patch development with new drugs versus generic development – principles and methods Dr. Barbara Schug SocraTec R&D, Oberursel , Germany www.socratec-pharma.de AGAH Workshop, The new European modified Release Guideline- from cook book to interpretation, Bonn, June 15th –16th, 2015 Some basics Physico-chemical properties / conventional patches small molecule < 500kDa lipophilic potent therapeutic concept which requires low fluctuation Skin controls release rate drug substance dispersed in adhesive matrix Patch controls release rate rate controlling membrane between drug reservoir and skin Currently marketed patches Year Generic (Brand) Names Indication 1979 Scopolamine (Transderm Scop®) Motion sickness 1982 Nitroglycerine (Nitroderm TTS) Angina pectoris 1984 Clonidine (Catapress TTS®) Hypertension 1986 Estradiol (Estraderm®) Menopausal symptoms 1990 Fentanyl (Duragesic®) Chronic pain 1991 Nicotine (Nicoderm®, Habitrol®, Prostep®) Smoking cessation 1993 Testosterone (Androderm®) Testosterone deficiency 1995 Lidocaine/epinephrine (Iontocaine®) Local dermal analgesia 1998 Estradiol/norethindrone (Combipatch®) Menopausal symptoms 1999 Lidocaine (Lidoderm®) Post-herpetic neuralgia pain 2001 Ethinyl estradiol/norelgestromin (OrthoEvra®) Contraception 2003 Estradiol/levonorgestrel (Climara Pro®) Menopause 2003 Oxybutynin (Oxytrol®) Overactive bladder 2004 Lidocaine/ultrasound (SonoPrep®) Local dermal anesthesia Source: modified from Wilson EJ, Three Generations: The Past, Present, and Future of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems, May 2014 -
F.8 Ethinylestradiol-Etonogestrel.Pdf
General Items 1. Summary statement of the proposal for inclusion, change or deletion. Here within, please find the evidence to support the inclusion Ethinylestradiol/Etonogestrel Vaginal Ring in the World Health Organization’s Essential Medicines List (EML). Unintended pregnancy is regarded as a serious public health issue both in developed and developing countries and has received growing research and policy attention during last few decades (1). It is a major global concern due to its association with adverse physical, mental, social and economic outcomes. Developing countries account for approximately 99% of the global maternal deaths in 2015, with sub-Saharan Africa alone accounting for roughly 66% (2). Even though the incidence of unintended pregnancy has declined globally in the past decade, the rate of unintended pregnancy remains high, particularly in developing regions. (3) Regarding the use of contraceptive vaginal rings, updated bibliography (4,5,6) states that contraceptive vaginal rings (CVR) offer an effective contraceptive option, expanding the available choices of hormonal contraception. Ethinylestradiol/Etonogestrel Vaginal Ring is a non-biodegradable, flexible, transparent with an outer diameter of 54 mm and a cross-sectional diameter of 4 mm. It contains 11.7 mg etonogestrel and 2.7 mg ethinyl estradiol. When placed in the vagina, each ring releases on average 0.120 mg/day of etonogestrel and 0.015 mg/day of ethinyl estradiol over a three-week period of use. Ethinylestradiol/Etonogestrel Vaginal Ring is intended for women of fertile age. The safety and efficacy have been established in women aged 18 to 40 years. The main advantages of CVRs are their effectiveness (similar or slightly better than the pill), ease of use without the need of remembering a daily routine, user ability to control initiation and discontinuation, nearly constant release rate allowing for lower doses, greater bioavailability and good cycle control with the combined ring, in comparison with oral contraceptives. -
Wellness Benefits
Wellness Benefits University of South Alabama This schedule outlines services and items that the University of South Alabama considers a preventive service under this plan. These services must be performed by a physician in the University of South Alabama Health System provider network or by a dermatologist, endocrinologist, durable medical equipment provider, ancillary service provider, urologist, or rheumatologist provider (as applicable) in the entire VIVA HEALTH network. Many of these services are provided as part of an annual physical. This list does not apply to all VIVA HEALTH plans. Please refer to your Summary Plan Description to determine the terms of your health plan. PREVENTIVE SERVICE FREQUENCY/LIMITATIONS Well Baby Visits (Age 0-2) As recommended per guidelines1 Routine screenings, tests, and immunizations As recommended per guidelines Well Child Visits (Age 3-17) One per year at PCP2 Routine screenings, tests, & immunizations As recommended per guidelines HIV screening and counseling As recommended per guidelines Obesity screening As recommended per guidelines Hepatitis B virus screening As recommended per guidelines Sexually transmitted infection counseling Annually Skin cancer behavioral counseling (Beginning at age 10) As recommended per guidelines Routine Physical (Age 18+) One per year at PCP2 Alcohol misuse screening and counseling Annually Blood pressure screening Annually Cholesterol screening As recommended per guidelines Depression screening Annually Diabetes screening As recommended per -
Vaginal Administration of Contraceptives
Scientia Pharmaceutica Review Vaginal Administration of Contraceptives Esmat Jalalvandi 1,*, Hafez Jafari 2 , Christiani A. Amorim 3 , Denise Freitas Siqueira Petri 4 , Lei Nie 5,* and Amin Shavandi 2,* 1 School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK 2 BioMatter Unit, École Polytechnique de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 50-CP 165/61, 1050 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] 3 Pôle de Recherche en Gynécologie, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] 4 Fundamental Chemistry Department, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes 748, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil; [email protected] 5 College of Life Sciences, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (E.J.); [email protected] (L.N.); [email protected] (A.S.); Tel.: +32-2-650-3681 (A.S.) Abstract: While contraceptive drugs have enabled many people to decide when they want to have a baby, more than 100 million unintended pregnancies each year in the world may indicate the contraceptive requirement of many people has not been well addressed yet. The vagina is a well- established and practical route for the delivery of various pharmacological molecules, including contraceptives. This review aims to present an overview of different contraceptive methods focusing on the vaginal route of delivery for contraceptives, including current developments, discussing the potentials and limitations of the modern methods, designs, and how well each method performs for delivering the contraceptives and preventing pregnancy. -
Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2013 Adapted from the World Health Organization Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2Nd Edition
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Early Release / Vol. 62 June 14, 2013 U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2013 Adapted from the World Health Organization Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2nd Edition Continuing Education Examination available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/cme/conted.html. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Early Release CONTENTS CONTENTS (Continued) Introduction ............................................................................................................1 Appendix A: Summary Chart of U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Methods ....................................................................................................................2 Contraceptive Use, 2010 .................................................................................. 47 How To Use This Document ...............................................................................3 Appendix B: When To Start Using Specific Contraceptive Summary of Changes from WHO SPR ............................................................4 Methods .............................................................................................................. 55 Contraceptive Method Choice .........................................................................4 Appendix C: Examinations and Tests Needed Before Initiation of Maintaining Updated Guidance ......................................................................4 Contraceptive Methods -
Biomedical Technology and Devices Handbook
1140_bookreps.fm Page 1 Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:47 AM 29 Pharmaceutical Technical Background on Delivery Methods CONTENTS 29.1 Introduction 29.2 Central Nervous System: Drug Delivery Challenges to Delivery: The Blood Brain Barrier • Indirect Routes of Administration • Direct Routes of Administration 29.3 Cardiovascular System: Drug Delivery Chronotherapeutics • Grafts/Stents 29.4 Orthopedic: Drug Delivery Metabolic Bone Diseases 29.5 Muscular System: Drug Delivery 29.6 Sensory: Drug Delivery Ultrasound • Iontophoresis/Electroporation 29.7 Digestive System: Drug Delivery GI Stents • Colonic Drug Delivery 29.8 Pulmonary: Drug Delivery Indirect Routes of Administration • Direct Routes of Robert S. Litman Administration Nova Southeastern University 29.9 Ear, Nose, and Throat: Drug Delivery Maria de la Cova The Ear • The Nose • The Throat 29.10 Lymphatic System: Drug Delivery Icel Gonzalez 29.11 Reproductive System: Drug Delivery University of Memphis Contraceptive Implants • Contraceptive Patch • Male Contraceptive Eduardo Lopez References 29.1 Introduction In the evolution of drug development and manufacturing, drug delivery systems have risen to the forefront in the latest of pharmaceutical advances. There are many new pharmacological entities discov- ered each year, each with its own unique mechanism of action. Each drug will demonstrate its own pharmacokinetic profile. This profile may be changed by altering the drug delivery system to the target site. In order for a drug to demonstrate its pharmacological activity it must be absorbed, transported to the appropriate tissue or target organ, penetrate to the responding subcellular structure, and elicit a response or change an ongoing process. The drug may be simultaneously or sequentially distributed to a variety of tissues, bound or stored, further metabolized to active or inactive products, and eventually © 2004 by CRC Press LLC 1140_bookreps.fm Page 2 Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:47 AM 29-2 Biomedical Technology and Devices Handbook excreted from the body. -
Regulations Governing the Classification of Medical Devices (Draft)
Regulations Governing the Classification of Medical Devices (Draft) Article 1 These Regulations are enacted pursuant to Paragraph 2, Article 3 of the Medical Devices Act (hereinafter “this Act”). Article 2 Medical devices are classified into the following categories according to their function, intended use, operating instructions, and working principle, depending on the applicable medical specialty: 1. Clinical chemistry and clinical toxicology devices 2. Hematology and pathology devices 3. Immunology and microbiology devices 4. Anesthesiology devices 5. Cardiovascular devices 6. Dental devices 7. Ear, nose, and throat devices 8. Gastroenterology and urology devices 9. General and plastic surgery devices 10. General hospital and personal use devices 11. Neurological devices 12. Obstetrical and gynecological devices 13. Ophthalmic devices 14. Orthopedic devices 15. Physical medicine devices 16. Radiology devices Article 3 Medical devices are classified into the following classes according to their risk level: 1. Class I: Low risk 2. Class II: Medium risk 3. Class III: High risk 1 Article 4 Product items of the medical device classification are specified in the Annex. In addition to rules stated in the Annex, medical devices whose function, intended use, or working principle are special may have their classification determined according to the following rules: 1. If two or more categories, classes, or product items are applicable to the same medical device, the highest class of risk level is assigned. 2. The accessory to a medical device, intended specifically by the manufacturer for use with a particular medical device, is classified the same as the particular medical device, unless otherwise specified in the Annex. 3. -
Sterilization As a Family Planning Method
December 2018 | Fact Sheet Sterilization as a Family Planning Method Sterilization is a permanent method of contraception, and is the most commonly used form of family planning among couples both in the United States and worldwide. For men and women who no longer want to have children, sterilization offers a permanent, safe, cost-effective and efficacious way to prevent unintended pregnancy. Male sterilization is less common than female sterilization, but both are nearly 100% effective at preventing pregnancy. The Affordable Care Act’s no-cost coverage of sterilization has increased the affordability of the procedure for women, but it is still unclear the overall effect this will have on future utilization rates. Recent changes to insurance coverage policy, broader availability of long- acting contraceptives, as well as changes in the health care delivery system may reshape the choices that men and women make regarding the use of sterilization as a contraceptive method. This fact sheet explains the types of sterilization procedures available to women and men, reviews private insurance and Medicaid coverage policy, and discusses issues that affect availability in the U.S. Female Sterilization Female sterilization is an Figure 1 outpatient surgical Prevalence of Sterilization Among Women 15 to 44 Who procedure. The procedure Report Using a Reversible or Permanent Contraceptive blocks the fallopian tubes, Method, 2013-2015, by Selected Characteristics preventing eggs from All women, ages 15-44 22% travelling down the tubes to the uterus and blocking Ages 25-34 19% sperm from fertilizing the Ages 35-44 39% egg. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Black 26% Hispanic 25% Prevention (CDC) show that White 21% among women ages 15 to 44 who use a contraceptive ≥ 200% FPL 16% method, one in five used ≤ 200% FPL 29% tubal ligation as their method 1 of contraception. -
Sterilization of the Developmentally Disabled: Shedding Some Myth-Conceptions
Florida State University Law Review Volume 9 Issue 4 Article 3 Fall 1981 Sterilization of the Developmentally Disabled: Shedding Some Myth-Conceptions Deborah Hardin Ross Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Disability Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation Deborah H. Ross, Sterilization of the Developmentally Disabled: Shedding Some Myth-Conceptions, 9 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 599 (1981) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol9/iss4/3 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STERILIZATION OF THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED:* SHEDDING SOME MYTH-CONCEPTIONS DEBORAH HARDIN Ross I. Introduction ..................................... 600 II. Non-Consensual Sterilization Under Statutory Au- thority .......................................... 602 A. Sociological, Legislative, and Judicial Back- ground ..................................... 602 B. Analysis of Present Statutes .................. 606 1. To Whom Applied ...................... 607 2. Procedure .............................. 607 3. Justification for Sterilization ............. 608 4. Standards .............................. 609 C. Substantive Due Process ..................... 609 1. No Compelling State Interest ............ 611 a. Justifications and False Assumptions -
Contraception and Beyond: the Health Benefits of Services Provided at Family Planning Centers Megan L
July 2013 Contraception and Beyond: The Health Benefits of Services Provided at Family Planning Centers Megan L. Kavanaugh and Ragnar M. Anderson HIGHLIGHTS n A large and growing body of literature explores the health benefits related to services received at family planning clinics. n Research indicates that family planning, including planning, delaying and spacing pregnancies, is linked to improved birth outcomes for babies, either directly or through healthy maternal behaviors during pregnancy. n Contraceptive methods have a range of benefits other than their primary purpose of preg- nancy prevention. Contraception reduces pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality, reduces the risk of developing certain reproductive cancers, and can be used to treat many menstrual- related symptoms and disorders. n In addition to contraception, a range of other beneficial health services are available to clients at family planning clinics. Services to prevent, screen for and treat diseases and conditions such as chlamydia, gonorrhea, HIV, HPV and cervical cancer, as well as to address intimate partner violence, benefit both female and male clients who visit these clinics. n Because not all women have equal access to the many benefits of contraception and other health services, there is more work to be done in implementing programs and policies that advance contraceptive access and improve health outcomes for all women. CONTENTS Introduction.......................................................................................3 Background and History -
VTE Prophylaxis in Gynecologic Surgery
ClinicalProviding Information Evidence-based for 25 Years AHC Media LLC Home Page—www.ahcmedia.com CME for Physicians—www.cmeweb.com EDITOR VTE Prophylaxis in Gynecologic Jeffrey T. Jensen, MD, MPH Leon Speroff Professor and Vice Chair for Research Surgery: Quo Vadis? Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology ABSTRACT & COMMENTARY Oregon Health & Science University InsIde Portland Oligohydram- By Robert L. Coleman, MD ASSOCIATE EDITORS nios: A reason Sarah L. Berga, MD Professor and Chair to deliver? Professor, University of Texas; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Department of Obstetrics and page 59 Gynecology Vice President for Women’s Dr. Coleman reports no financial relationships relevant to this field of study. Health Services Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC Which is Synopsis: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis better: Open, Robert L. Coleman, MD interventions in gynecologic surgery are meritorious, supported Professor, University of laparoscopic, by Level 1 evidence and the subject of multiple guidelines, including Texas; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston or robotic? those published by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. However, new evidence suggests nearly Alison Edelman, MD, MPH page 60 Associate Professor, one-third of women undergoing hysterectomy in this country Assistant Director of the still receive no VTE prophylaxis, placing thousands of women at Family Planning Fellowship Special Department of Obstetrics & unnecessary risk for preventable morbidity. Gynecology, Oregon Health feature: & Science University, Portland Do we have a Source: Wright JD, et al. Quality of perioperative venous thromboembolism John C. Hobbins, MD problem? prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:978-986. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obesity and University of Colorado Health contraception he objective of this study was to estimate the use of vte pro- Sciences Center, Denver page 61 Tphylaxis in women undergoing major gynecologic surgery and to Frank W.