DOCSLIB.ORG

Baseline Survey Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Baseline Survey Report Social Learning for Adaptive Tourism Management BASELINE SURVEY REPORT October 2009 Tourism for Future Generations BASELINE SURVEY REPORT 2 CONTENTS 1. Introducing the project ................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................................... 3 3. Background ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 4. Methodology ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 5. Findings… ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 5.1 Village land use management ............................................................................................................... 5 5.2 Natural resource management and conservation ............................................................................. 6 5.3 Employment and livelihood diversification .......................................................................................... 7 5.4 Local governance and accountability ................................................................................................. 8 5.5 Tourism development and management........................................................................................... 10 6. Conclusion and recommendations ............................................................................................................ 11 7. About the partners ......................................................................................................................................... 12 1. INTRODUCING THE PROJECT The aim of this project is to develop innovative approaches to community involvement in tourism planning that communities and responsible tourism businesses across Tanzania can all benefit from. The project is co-ordinated by the Tanzania Natural Resource Forum (TNRF), and implemented by a team consisting of representatives from TNRF, Ujamaa Community Resource Trust (UCRT), Honey- guide Foundation and Tasconsult. Funding is provided by the IUCN’s Ecosystem Grants Programme and Sand County Foundation’s Bradley Fund for the Environment. The project will run from April 2009 to March 2010. The geographical area is Ngorongoro District in the villages of Piyaya, Engaresero, Pinyinyi and Arash. These villages are involved because of existing, or high potential for tourism activities in the area. There are already established relationships between these villages and Honeyguide and UCRT. Goal of the project Better planned tourism to directly improve local livelihoods and rangeland ecosystem management through ethical business partnerships with rural communities. Objectives x To produce participatory adaptive management plans for tourism in four villages in the Lake Natron and Loliondo areas of Ngorongoro District. x To produce a toolkit of best practices derived from the workshop and the project’s accumulated experience for use in other private investor-community initiatives involving tourism. Introducing the baseline survey The baseline surveys which were carried out in May and June 2009 were designed to serve several purposes. The questions aimed to elicit information forming a basis for evaluation at the end of the project period and beyond. In addition, the surveys aimed to capture information which would en- able the project team to understand the needs and requirements of the various stakeholders and provide information to direct the project towards achieving the objectives. The information also pro- vides valuable inputs in the workshops, and can be useful to the various stakeholders. Photos credits (except for page 9 and back cover): Gian Schachenman 2009 ADAPTIVE TOURISM MANAGEMENT 3 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The scope of the baseline survey was 4 project charged by the district authorities, threaten village areas, Pinyinyi, Engaresero, Arash and the competitiveness of the tourism product. Piyaya. All of the villages have existing tourism The household survey revealed repeated re- enterprises that have been in operation within quests from the various members of all the vil- the villages for a number of years, with the ex- lages for more transparency in contracts, reve- ception of Pinyinyi. Each of these companies is nues and donations made to the village. Vil- experienced in tourism ventures and also oper- lagers feel they lack information about con- ate in other areas of Tanzania. tracts with the tourism enterprises, affecting The household survey confirmed that the local their ability to question the village leadership. community was well aware of the natural re- For example, one village indicated there were sources present on village land, however ef- no contracts with any tourism enterprises. How- forts to conserve these resources are not pro- ever, a current contract was later provided to active and do not incorporate the village the survey team by an operator. Hence, little members sufficiently. For example, Lake Na- was known of the various tourism develop- tron is the largest body of water in the project ment initiatives existing in the village, nor of the area and the lake is to be proposed as a Ram- total value of donations being invested in vil- sar site, but there was no indication that the lage development through tourism enterprises. village government or members of the village The tourism companies and the village govern- were aware of this development, nor was it ments did not have the same understanding clear what it meant to them. of the contract obligations, as further evi- Wildlife is managed centrally by the Wildlife denced by the frequent breaches of contrac- Division (WD). However, due to little support tual agreements by both parties. Formal com- from the WD or district authorities, the village munication between the tour operators and authorities have taken the initiative to manage the village government varied significantly. Ad conflicts between wildlife and humans. One hoc communication was the norm, and only example of participation between the village one village conducted regular meetings. Writ- and the tourism companies exists where they ten guidelines for responsible tourism were ei- jointly established a conservation scheme that ther not available or the copies provided by involved the contribution of funds to compen- the tour operators and the villages differed. sate village members for loss of livestock due Also, there were no mechanisms for evaluating to predators. the performance of such guidelines or bylaws. Piyaya, Arash and Engaresero villages have The contribution of the tourism enterprises to committees that are responsible for the envi- employment and livelihood diversification is ronment and tourism activities. The baseline hindered for two main reasons. First, communi- study examined household awareness of such ties live in arid areas and are geographically bodies and their roles. It was clear in all villages separated from the main offices of the tourism that the structures governing natural resources enterprises, making negotiations and market- and tourism were not known among the gen- ing of cultural attractions difficult. Second, eral populace. All village governments re- many of the local people have little educa- quested training and support to improve gov- tion, and therefore employed in the less de- ernance and tourism management. Although manding jobs within the tourism enterprises. the village leadership and members are The inadequate employment and little proac- aware of the natural resources and basic tour- tive action to develop this sector have signifi- ism attractions of their villages, they lack the cant impacts on the mindset of the local com- knowledge of tourism as a business. The village munity and the likelihood for tourism to directly governments also lack the opportunity to iden- improve the households’ economy. tify the particular products that would provide the basis to strategically broker lasting deals and to manage the development of tourism. ____________ The fee structure for tourism products differed from village to village. It was not entirely clear * Ramsar is the name of an international how the fees were realized. It was noted that convention for the sustainable protection of important wetland resources for water birds. It is fees being charged by other administrations named after a town in Iran. such as the WD and gate entrance fees BASELINE SURVEY REPORT 4 3. BACKGROUND 4. METHODOLOGY The four villages that participated in the A questionnaire was developed based on baseline study are all within Ngorongoro Dis- the project indicators, and was modified for trict. Arash and Piyaya are neighbouring vil- three different groups of respondents: village lages and have very similar tourism products. government officials, households, and tour Engaresero and Pinyinyi villages also operators. The survey was conducted by a neighbour each other but only Engaresero small team from UCRT and Honeyguide Foun- has a substantial tourism product. Pinyinyi vil- dation in the project villages of Piyaya, Arash, lage has a small commitment from a tour op- Pinyinyi, and Engaresero. erator. The populations of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mkoa Wa Arusha Halmashauri Ya Wilaya Ya Ngorongoro Wanafunzi Waliochaguliwa Kujiunga Na Kidato Cha Kwanza 2021
    MKOA WA ARUSHA HALMASHAURI YA WILAYA YA NGORONGORO WANAFUNZI WALIOCHAGULIWA KUJIUNGA NA KIDATO CHA KWANZA 2021 C: SHULE ZA SEKONDARI ZA KUTWA/HOSTEL SHULE YA SEKONDARI ARASH I:WAVULANA NAMBA YA SHULE NA JINA LA MTAHINIWA SHULE ATOKAYO DARAJA PREMS AENDAYO 1 20141524943 OLOWASSA KOPIRATO NANGIRIA ENG/SAMBU ARASH A 2 20141524934 KOISIKIRI PANIANI MUTEL ENG/SAMBU ARASH A 3 20141524938 MORANI LAZARO JARTAN ENG/SAMBU ARASH A 4 20141612507 WACHINGA LEMANGI NG'EYDASHEG OLPIRO ARASH A 5 20141524945 TAGEI ROKOBE MUSSA ENG/SAMBU ARASH A 6 20141612495 GIDASHI JERUMAN BALAWA OLPIRO ARASH A 7 20141612493 GIDABARDEDA GULENDE GIDAGUJONJODA OLPIRO ARASH B 8 20141556147 SAITOTI JOSEPH MBOTOONY ENG/SAMBU ARASH B 9 20141568040 KAJEFU JOHN KWABE MAGERI ARASH B 10 20141612502 GIYONGI LEMANGI NG'EYDASHEG OLPIRO ARASH B 11 20141568041 KASUBENI KANARI SUGENYA MAGERI ARASH B 12 20141612497 GISAGHAN GITAMBODA NENAGI OLPIRO ARASH B 13 20141524937 LEMAYANI NDEREREI KEREKU ENG/SAMBU ARASH B 14 20141524932 ERICK INOSENTI KIMWAI ENG/SAMBU ARASH B 15 20141524941 OLOINYAKWA KIARO MOTI ENG/SAMBU ARASH B 16 20141568039 JULIUS KANARI SUGENYA MAGERI ARASH B 17 20141556145 SABORE MURIANGA MASHATI NG'ARWA ARASH B 18 20141612499 GITARAN GWAYDESH GISHING'ADEDA OLPIRO ARASH B 19 20141524939 NDOLEI SALONIKI SEREKA ENG/SAMBU ARASH B 20 20141350416 OLAIS LESKARI MOLLEL OLBALBAL ARASH B 21 20141623101 SAGUYA WILLIAM KASINIA MASUSU ARASH B 22 20141232035 EMANUEL FAUSTINI GWANDU OLBALBAL ARASH B 23 20141637008 PASCAL JACOB DOODOSI OLBALBAL ARASH B 24 20141524936 KUMOMALI SANDETWA SILOMA
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration and Evaluation of the Alternative Wildlife Management Options for the Loliondo Game Controlled Area in Tanzania: Multi-Criteria Analysis
    Exploration and Evaluation of the Alternative Wildlife Management Options for the Loliondo Game Controlled Area in Tanzania: Multi-criteria Analysis Gileard Minja [B.Education (Sc), MSc] Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography, Environment and Population School of Social Sciences The University of Adelaide October 2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... vii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................. viii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. xi Abstract ................................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Research Background and Problem Statement .................................................................... 1 1.2 Research Question and Objectives......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigating Positive Impacts Without Improving Modalities /Regulations in the Project Area, the Perceived Benefits Will Not Be Realized
    Appendix C - Lake Natron Soda Ash ESIA C - 56 Mitigating Positive Impacts Without improving modalities /regulations in the project area, the perceived benefits will not be realized. The following initiatives will lead to realization of the mentioned positive impact. Setting by laws and adhering to them. Employment opportunities being awarded to educated people in the local area. Impart the local with technical knowledge through exchange program and on job training The contracts should understood by the communities Part of the Soda Ash should be utilized locally to establish or revitalize local industries. Stakeholders analysis The participants were requested to identify all stakeholders that in one way or another can support the project positively or affect negatively the efficiency of the project. These stakeholders ranged from central government, district authorities, non-governmental organizations, religion groups and communities. The identified stakeholders were clustered. The clustering was based on their interests, expectations and possible responsibilities in the project of soda ash development project. These groups will have several responsibilities in the implementation of the Environmental and Socio-economic Management Plan. The management plan has to be implemented in collaboration of all the stakeholders. Every stakeholder identified has a certain responsibilities during the project cycle. The identified stakeholders are listed on Table C-1 below:- Table C-1: List of Stakeholders Group Stakeholder. Authorities Ministries of
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the State of Pastoralists' Human Rights in Tanzania
    REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] Cover Picture: Maasai warriors dancing at the initiation ceremony of Mr. Kipulelia Kadege’s children in Handeni District, Tanga Region, April 2006. PAICODEO Tanzania Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark 1 REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro-Rural, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] PARAKUIYO PASTORALISTS INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION-(PAICODEO) Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark i REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 Researchers Legal and Development Consultants Limited (LEDECO Advocates) Writer Adv. Clarence KIPOBOTA (Advocate of the High Court) Publisher Parakuiyo Pastoralists Indigenous Community Development Organization © PAICODEO March, 2013 ISBN: 978-9987-9726-1-6 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... vii FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................viii Legal Status and Objectives of PAICODEO ...........................................................viii Vision ......................................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Natron Soda Ash Draft ESIA
    Chapter 3 - Lake Natron Soda Ash ESIA 3 - 6 The Act has wide ranging powers; of direct relevance to this EIA are the following Sections: • Section 47-49 allows for the proclamation of environmental planning areas which would be managed by the Environmental Council and for which an environmental management plan would be prepared. • Section 51 allows for the minister to declare an Environmentally Sensitive Area. • Section 56 allows for the declaration of an area as a protected wetland. • Sections 106 – 113 state that it is an offence to emit pollutants, emit noise or discharges in excess of the standards prescribed. • Section 141 requires any person undertaking an activity to comply to environmental standards and criteria. • Section 151 allows the Council to require any person to reinstate the environment to a state as near to the original as possible. • Section 178 ensures the public right to environmental information and to participate in decision making. 3.3.2 Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines and Audit Regulations (2005) The guidelines provide the legislative framework for the impact assessment process from screening of project to review. Report format and qualifications of parties to conduct an ESIA are well elaborated. 3.3.3 Wildlife Conservation Act (1974) The principal legislation governing wildlife utilization in Tanzania is the Wildlife Conservation Act of 1974. This Act provides the Director of Wildlife with powers to oversee the overall management of wildlife in the country. The Director is in charge of game reserves, game conservation areas, and open lands, while the Tanzania National Parks Authority (TANAPA) is in charge of the national parks (Lawyers' Environmental Action Team (LEAT).
    [Show full text]
  • Na Namba Ya Mtahiniwa Jina La Mtahiniwa Shule Atokayo Shule Aendayo Daraja Mkoa Wa Arusha Halmashari Ya Wilaya Ya Ngorongoro
    MKOA WA ARUSHA HALMASHARI YA WILAYA YA NGORONGORO WANAFUNZI WALIOCHAGULIWA KUJIUNGA KIDATO CHA KWANZA 2020 A: SHULE ZA BWENI I: WAVULANA SHULE ZA UFAULU MZURI ZAIDI NAMBA YA NA MTAHINIWA JINA LA MTAHINIWA SHULE ATOKAYO SHULE AENDAYO DARAJA BRIGHT 1 PS0107066-005 JOEL FABIAN ALLY ILBORU A BRIGHT 2 PS0107066-007 JOSEPH JONAS MJEMA MZUMBE A SHULE ZA UFUNDI NAMBA YA NA MTAHINIWA JINA LA MTAHINIWA SHULE ATOKAYO SHULE AENDAYO DARAJA MARIE 1 PS0107067-007 ROLLAND BARBADIS MTENGA CORRENSON MOSHI TECHNICAL A BRIGHT 2 PS0107066-006 JOEL MUSSA MARCO TANGA TECHNICAL A ENDULEN 3 PS0107005-025 LOMITU MANGI SANING'O TANGA TECHNICAL A SHULE ZA BWENI KAWAIDA NAMBA YA NA MTAHINIWA JINA LA MTAHINIWA SHULE ATOKAYO SHULE AENDAYO DARAJA ENDULEN 1 PS0107005-007 DENIS MATHAYO KIMAY MOSHI SEKONDARI A SHULE ZA UFAULU MZURI ZAIDI II: WASICHANA NAMBA YA NA MTAHINIWA JINA LA MTAHINIWA SHULE ATOKAYO SHULE AENDAYO DARAJA BRIGHT 1 PS0107066-017 IRENE ISSAYA MOJAH TABORA GIRLS A ENDULEN 2 PS0107005-091 NASRA KARIM ZUBER KOROGWE GIRLS A B: SHULE ZA SEKONDARI KUTWA/HOSTEL SHULE YA SEKONDARI ARASH I: WAVULANA NAMBA YA NA MTAHINIWA JINA LA MTAHINIWA SHULE ATOKAYO SHULE AENDAYO DARAJA ENDULEN 1 PS0107005-018 LEINA LESIKAR NAGOL ARASH A BRIGHT 2 PS0107066-002 ELIA MATEI SEIYAI ARASH A ENDULEN 3 PS0107005-011 FAUSTIN AUGUSTINO MOHAMED ARASH A MARIE 4 PS0107067-001 BARAKA DENARY GIMIREY CORRENSON ARASH B Page 1 of 72 NAMBA YA NA MTAHINIWA JINA LA MTAHINIWA SHULE ATOKAYO SHULE AENDAYO DARAJA NG'ARWA 5 PS0107035-001 BARNOTI OLENANYIMO MEINGWERI ARASH B MARIE 6 PS0107067-003 ELIA
    [Show full text]
  • Sero-Prevalence and Spatial Distribution of Rift Valley Fever Infection Among Agro-Pastoral and Pastoral Communities During Inte
    Ahmed et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2018) 18:276 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3183-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Sero-prevalence and spatial distribution of Rift Valley fever infection among agro- pastoral and pastoral communities during Interepidemic period in the Serengeti ecosystem, northern Tanzania Abade Ahmed1*, Jabir Makame1,2, Fyumagwa Robert3, Keyyu Julius3 and Matee Mecky2 Abstract Background: In the past two decades, Rift Valley Fever (RVF) outbreaks have been reported twice in Tanzania, with the most recent outbreak occurring in 2006/07. Given the ecology and climatic factors that support mosquito vectors in the Serengeti ecosystem, we hypothesized a continued transmission of RVF virus (RVFV) during interepidemic periods. This study was carried out to determine sero-prevalence, spatial distribution and factors associated with RVF in at-risk agro-pastoral and pastoral communities in the Serengeti Ecosystem in northern Tanzania. Methods: A cross sectional study was carried out to establish the general exposure to RVFV by detecting anti–RVFV IgG and anti–RVFV IgM using ELISA techniques. The health facilities where human subjects were blood sampled concurrent with interviews included Bunda District Designated Hospital, Wasso DDH, Endulen hospital, Arash, Malambo, Olbabal, and Piyaya dispenaries (Ngorongoro district) and Nyerere DDH (Serengeti district) respectively. In addition, human subjects from Lamadi ward (Busega district) were recruited while receiving medical service at Bunda DDH. We conducted logistic regression to assess independent risk factor and mapped the hotspot areas for exposure to RVFV. Results: A total of 751 subjects (males = 41.5%; females = 58.5%) with a median age of 35.5 years were enrolled at out-patient clinics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Multiple Land Use Model of Ngorongoro Conservation Area: Achievements and Lessons Learnt, Challenges and Options for the Future
    UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE MULTIPLE LAND USE MODEL OF NGORONGORO CONSERVATION AREA: ACHIEVEMENTS AND LESSONS LEARNT, CHALLENGES AND OPTIONS FOR THE FUTURE FINAL REPORT ! ! ! Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism Dodoma October, 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Team of Experts wish to extend appreciation to the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism (MNRT) for appointment to undertake review of !i Ngorongoro Conservation Area’s Multiple Land use Model. Our thanks are extended to institutions for granting permission. Thanks are also extended to the Board of Directors and Management of Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority (NCAA) for facilitating the Team in terms of logistics and guidance. The Team further acknowledges inputs and discussion with the National Land Use Planning Commission, which is reviewing General Management Plan (GMP) of Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA) and appreciates the valuable inputs from the United Nations-Education, Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO) Commission-Tanzania Office, Tanzania Tourist Board, tourism stakeholders and Non-Governmental Organizations operating in Ngorongoro district and NCA in particular. The Team is grateful to the District Commissioner for Ngorongoro Dr. Rashid Mfaume Taka, Council Management Teams for Karatu, Ngorongoro, Longido, Monduli and Meatu districts, and the Office of the Arusha Regional Commissioner as well as the Administrative Secretary for sharing information and knowledge on the current and future situation of NCA. Wildlife and natural resources management authorities, research and higher learning institutions and the National Museum of Tanzania- are thanked for fruitful discussions and inputs. Thanks are in addition extended to political and religious leaders from Ngorongoro District who provided invaluable contributions. The Team is as well indebted to the elders and members of Ngorongoro Pastoral Council (NPC) who were instrumental in sharing their experience on issues pertaining to NCA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of Cheetahs and Other Large Carnivores in a Pastoralist-Dominated Buffer Zone
    The ecology of cheetahs and other large carnivores in a pastoralist-dominated buffer zone By Thomas M. Maddox Ph.D. Thesis Department of Anthropology, University College, London & Institute of Zoology, London 2003 “No wild animals are really bad as you will be alone without them. It is good just to see and be happy” (Iltiyogoni laigwanan, Loliondo). 2 Summary Due to the various limitations of core-protected areas, interest in semi-protected landscapes and the human-wildlife interactions that occur within them is rapidly gaining credence. Some of the most important issues within this field are human- carnivore relationships, with many large carnivores globally threatened on one hand but with the capability of potentially devastating impacts on humans on the other. In this thesis, the success of cheetahs, their competitors and their predators in two buffer zones (Loliondo and Ngorongoro) of the Serengeti National Park in Tanzania was examined in comparison with populations living inside the park. The potential role played in carnivore ecology by the Maasai pastoralists inhabiting the buffer zones was then examined to assess the extent to which their presence determines any of the differences. The results show that large carnivores and their prey are surviving successfully outside the core-protected area, coexisting with the pastoralist Maasai. Herbivores were shown to exist at equivalent diversity and density outside the park, with the two- 2 year average prey biomass significantly higher in Loliondo than inside the park (χ 2= 49, p<0.001). The only species consistently more abundant inside the park were kongoni, topi and warthog. However, temporal variation was large and the system was better described as a single, dynamic entity rather than three distinct and comparable sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Household Food Economy Assessment Arusha Region
    SAVE THE CHILDREN FUND (UK) with support from ECHO and WFP/DFID in collaboration with: THE PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE, TANZANIA, represented by the DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME HOUSEHOLD FOOD ECONOMY ASSESSMENT ARUSHA REGION Written by Tanya Boudreau Consultant, The Food Economy Group (F.E.G.) August 1999 SAVE THE CHILDREN FUND – UK P. O. Box 10414, Dar es Salaam E-mail: [email protected] Household Food Economy Assessment – Arusha Region - The Household Food Economy Assessment in Arusha Region was undertaken within the frame work of the Emergency Support to Household Food Economy Assessments in Tanzania project. The project is a joint initiative of the Disaster Management Department (Prime Ministers Office), the World Food Programme and Save the Children Fund (UK). The overall project covers two additional regions of Tanzania, i.e. Singida and Dodoma, where similar assessments have been conducted. Arusha Region Field Team: Tanya Boudreau, Team Leader, Consultant, The Food Economy Group (F.E.G.) Jose Lopez, SCF (UK) Gabriel Kimolo, Disaster Management Department (PMO) Domina Kambanangwe, The World Food Programme, Kibondo R.I. Samwi, SCF (UK) Suleiman S. Mohamed, The World Food Programme/SCF (UK), Somalia I N T R O D U C T I O N The following report stems from two Tanzania - Arusha Region months of field study in Arusha Region, in May - July 1999, designed to establish baseline information on the livelihood patterns of rural households in different parts of the Region. The study was part of a larger initiative to establish a baseline food economy picture for three regions in the north and centre of Tanzania, including Arusha, Singida and Dodoma Regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Report
    Tourism for Future Generations Social Learning for Adaptive Tourism Management WORKSHOP REPORT July 2009 WORKSHOP REPORT 2 CONTENTS 2. GOAL OF THE PROJECT Better planned tourism directly improving 1. Introducing the project .................................... 2 local livelihoods and rangeland ecosystem 2. Goal of the project ........................................... 2 management through ethical business partnerships with rural communities. 3. Objectives .......................................................... 2 4. Activities implemented .................................... 3 5. Workshops introduction ................................... 3 6. Venue and participants .................................. 3 7. Facilitators........................................................... 3 8. Workshop objectives ........................................ 3 9. Methodology ..................................................... 4 3. OBJECTIVES 10. Expectations, fears and evaluation .............. 4 11. Workshop content ............................................ 5 • To produce participatory adaptive Land, environment and tourism ..................... 5 management plans for tourism in four Land use planning ............................................ 6 villages in the Lake Natron and Loliondo Tourism as a business ........................................ 6 areas of Ngorongoro District. Identifying challenges and opportunities .... 7 • To produce a best practices toolkit derived 12. Issues arising from the group work: from the workshop and the project’s
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Sampling Techniques for Rift Valley Fever Virus Potential Vectors, Aedes Aegypti and Culex Pipiens Complex, in Ngorongoro District in Northern Tanzania
    Tanzania Journal of Health Research Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v15i3.2 Volume 15, Number 3, July 2013 Comparison of sampling techniques for Rift Valley Fever virus potential vectors, Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens complex, in Ngorongoro District in northern Tanzania CLEMENT N. MWEYA1,2,* SHARADHULI I. KIMERA2, ESRON D. KARIMURIBO2 & LEONARD E.G. MBOERA3 1National Institute for Medical Research, Tukuyu Research Centre, P.O. Box 538, Tukuyu, Tanzania 2Sokoine University of Agriculture, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, P.O. Box 3021, Morogoro, Tanzania 3National Institute for Medical Research, Headquarters, P.O. Box 9653, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania ____________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract: We investigated mosquito sampling techniques with two types of traps and attractants at different time for trapping potential vectors for Rift Valley Fever virus. The study was conducted in six villages in Ngorongoro district in Tanzania from September to October 2012. A total of 1814 mosquitoes were collected, of which 738 were collected by CDC light traps and 1076 by Mosquito Magnet trapping technique. Of the collected mosquitoes, 12.46% (N= 226) were Aedes aegypti and 87.54% (N= 1588) were Culex pipiens complex. More mosquitoes were collected outdoors using Mosquito Magnets baited with octenol attractant, 36.38% (N=660) followed by indoor trapping using CDC light traps without attractant, 29.60% (N=537). Most of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes were collected outdoor using Mosquito Magnets, 95% (N=214) whereas Cx. pipiens complex were trapped both indoor using CDC light traps without attractant and outdoors using both CDC light traps baited with carbon dioxide (CO2) sachets and Mosquito Magnets.
    [Show full text]