ASU Coe Research Cover

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ASU Coe Research Cover AEPI Arizona Education Policy Initiative The Condition of Pre-K-12 Education in Arizona: 2004 abcdefghijklmnopqrstu vwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP QRSTUVWXYZ12345678910 abcdefghijklmnopqrstu vwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP May 2004 Education Policy Studies Laboratory Introduction Alex Molnar Arizona State University Tempe Campus The Condition of Education in Arizona: 2004 is a collection of ten policy briefs examining various key elements of the state’s public education system. The authors, contributors, and reviewers of the briefs are, for the most part, on the faculty of Arizona’s three public universities: Arizona State University, Northern Arizona University, and the University of Arizona. The Condition of Education in Arizona: 2004 is the first of a planned series of annual reports sponsored by the Arizona Education Policy Initiative (AEPI). Launched in 2003, the AEPI was created to focus the expertise of faculty from Arizona’s public universities on significant education policy issues in the state. Although the topics taken up in The Condition of Education in Arizona: 2004 are varied, there is one common theme: Arizona often lacks adequate data to make important education policy decisions. Again and again, in one area after another, the authors note the lack of data, conflicting data, or data that can not be cross referenced. Michael Kelley, of ASU West Campus, and Joseph Tobin, of ASU Tempe Campus, examine Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) in the state. They note that there is a large number of children on the state’s childcare subsidy waiting list, and that there is a significant disparity in wages paid to ECEC practitioners. Beyond that, they note that data necessary to plan efforts to strengthen and expand ECEC are not available. They recommend a variety of strategies to collect the necessary information in key areas. Kate Mahoney, of ASU East Campus, and Marilyn Thompson and Jeff MacSwan, both of ASU Tempe Campus, assess how policies affecting English Language Learners (ELLs) are interpreted and implemented in the classroom, and to what extent ELLs are progressing academically. They find that the available data are not adequate to answer such questions. Sarup R. Mathur and Robert B. Rutherford, both of ASU Tempe Campus, examine education for children with disabilities. They find gaps in the data needed to understand the quality of education that children with disabilities receive. There is, for example, little, if any, data available on the quality of the state’s pool of special education teachers or on factors that lead to the retention of high-quality special education teachers in Arizona. Josué M. González and Elsie M. Szecsy, both of the Southwest Center for Education Equity and Language Diversity at ASU Tempe Campus, find the data on minority student performance of limited value because they can not be disaggregated in ways that would make it possible to identify meaningful trends relating to achievement. They note that by not correcting these data deficiencies, the Arizona Department of Education (ADE) is making it difficult, if not impossible, to compare the adequacy of Arizona school programs to those of other states, or to evaluate the quality of the ADE’s leadership in helping local schools improve education for all children. Sherry Markel of NAU examines the twin issues of teacher shortages and teacher quality. She observes that although the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) equates teacher quality almost exclusively with subject matter knowledge, many experts emphasize pedagogical skills that NCLB ignores. This is a significant issue in Arizona because, in the face of anticipated teacher shortages in specific subjects and in certain geographic areas, there is increased pressure for “fast track” teacher education programs that greatly reduce training in pedagogical skills. Markel notes that a growing body of research raises important questions about the value of such “fast-track” models. Arnold Danzig, of ASU Tempe Campus, and Walter Delecki, of NAU, report on the supply, demand, and preparation of school administrators. They suggest that schools across the state would benefit from a more rigorous and better organized system for selecting the best candidates for administrator preparation. Danzig and Delecki find that data on administrator supply and demand is not particularly reliable or easily available. Additionally, no data are available to compare the performance of graduates from approved administrator certification programs with that of candidates who apply directly to the state for certification. 2 Examining attempts to assess public education by measuring student achievement, David R. Garcia, of the Arizona Center for Public Policy, and Joseph M. Ryan, of ASU West Campus, find that recent changes in the state measurement formulas have made it virtually impossible to draw valid conclusions about school improvement and, therefore, impossible to determine the impact of the Arizona LEARNS accountability system. Thomas M. Haladyna of ASU West Campus describes the incompatibility of the data from two leading measures of achievement: the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and the Stanford Achievement Test (Stanford 9). This incompatibility calls into question the validity of conclusions about the performance of Arizona students relative to that of students in the rest of the U.S. Gene V Glass of ASU Tempe Campus considers the two principal policies for expanding parental choice in Arizona: charter schools and private-school-tuition tax credits. He finds that data necessary to determine whether students in charter schools are performing better academically than they would have performed had they remained in traditional public schools do not exist. Further, he notes that data to determine whether Arizona’s private-school-tuition tax credit program has enabled public school students to attend private schools who otherwise could not have done so are not collected. Finally, Richard Wiggall of Northern Arizona University reviews the recent history of school-finance policy in Arizona, and finds that the state legislature’s policies have led to comparatively low per-pupil expenditure. Although the state has developed a funding approach that largely achieves equity, Wiggall concludes that it may have done so at the expense of funding adequacy. 3 Arizona Education by the Numbers: 2004 Alex Molnar Arizona State University Tempe Campus Daniel Allen Arizona State University Tempe Campus Public School District Profile The following tables offer a statistical overview of the public education system in Arizona. The tables are divided into six categories: (1) public school district & charter holder characteristics, (2) public school characteristics, (3) public school student characteristics, (4) public school student dropout characteristics, (5) public school teacher characteristics, and (6) public school administrator characteristics. Data limitations for tables within each category are noted following the tables within that category. Table 1: Total Public School Districts & Charter Holders 2003 Elementary School Districts 97 High School Districts 15 Unified School Districts 95 Accommodation School Districts 7 Total Districts 214 Charter Holders 308 Total Districts & Charter Holders 522 Source: Arizona Department of Education (2003). Superintendent's Annual Report. Retrieved April 23, 2004, from http://www.ade.az.gov/schoolfinance/Reports/ Table 2: Total Public School Districts 2003 Districts serving less than 100 students 30 Districts serving 100 to 500 students 49 Districts serving 501 to 1,000 students 20 Districts serving 1,001 to 2,500 students 46 Districts serving 2,501 to 5,000 students 27 Districts serving 5,001 to 10,000 students 21 Districts serving 10,001 or more students 24 Total Districts with Enrollment Data 217 Total Districts 238 Source: Arizona Department of Education (2003). Superintendent's Annual Report. Retrieved April 23, 2004, from http://www.ade.az.gov/schoolfinance/Reports/ Table 3: Average Public School District School Size Average School Size Districts serving less than 100 students 54.12 Districts serving 100 to 500 students 179.24 Districts serving 501 to 1,000 students 282.74 Districts serving 1,001 to 2,500 students 416.94 Districts serving 2,501 to 5,000 students 577.49 Districts serving 5,001 to 10,000 students 731.19 Districts serving 10,001 or more students 789.76 Total Districts with Enrollment Data 647.64 Source: Arizona Department of Education (2003). Superintendent's Annual Report. Retrieved April 23, 2004, from http://www.ade.az.gov/schoolfinance/Reports/ 1.2 Limitations: Public School District Profile For the 2002-03 school-year, enrollment data for 21 public school districts are not available. Consequently, the distribution of public school districts in Arizona according to enrollment size presented in Tables 2 and 3 does not include these 21 school districts Public School Profile Table 4: Total Public Schools 2003 District Schools 1,512 71.66% Charter Schools 598 28.34% Total Schools 2,110 100% Source: Arizona Department of Education (2003). Superintendent's Annual Report. Retrieved April 23,2004, from http://www.ade.az.gov/schoolfinance/Reports/ Table 5: Total District Schools by Type 2003 Elementary Schools 1,138 75.26% High Schools 271 17.92% Combined Schools 78 5.16% Accommodation Schools 25 1.65% Total District Schools 1,512 * Source: Arizona Department of Education (2003). Superintendent's Annual Report. Retrieved April 23,2004, from http://www.ade.az.gov/schoolfinance/Reports/
Recommended publications
  • WIOA Title I-B Annual Report
    WIOA Annual Statewide Performance Report Narrative for Title I and Title III Program Year 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. ii ARIZONA@WORK ...................................................................................................................... 2 ARIZONA ECONOMIC UPDATE .............................................................................................. 2 STATE-LEVEL ACTIVITIES ....................................................................................................... 6 WIOA WAIVERS ........................................................................................................................ 10 EFFECTIVENESS IN SERVING EMPLOYERS ................................................................... 10 STATE EVALUATION AND RESEARCH ACTIVITIES ....................................................... 11 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION ................................................................................................. 12 WIOA TITLE I-B and TITLE III HIGHLIGHTS ........................................................................ 13 SERVICE TO VETERANS ........................................................................................................ 13 REPORTING ............................................................................................................................... 15 COST EFFECTIVENESS ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Indenture and Affection in Intercultural Arizona, 1864-1894
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Department of History History, Department of 2012 Territorial Bonds: Indenture and Affection in Intercultural Arizona, 1864-1894 Katrina Jagodinsky University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historyfacpub Jagodinsky, Katrina, "Territorial Bonds: Indenture and Affection in Intercultural Arizona, 1864-1894" (2012). Faculty Publications, Department of History. 143. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historyfacpub/143 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Department of History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in ON THE BORDERS OF LOVE AND POWER: FAMILIES AND KINSHIP IN THE INTERCULTURAL AMERICAN SOUTHWEST, ed. David W. Adams & Crista DeLuzio (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2012), pp. 255-277. 11 Territorial Bonds Indenture and Affection in Intercultural Arizona, 1864-1894 Katrina Jagodinsky Borderlands families have never had it easy, and the second half of the nineteenth century was no exception. In an act of love and power, American and Hispano families reached out to Indian women and children to ease their borderlands bur­ dens. Lieutenant Colonel King S. Woolsey left his central Arizona ranch in 1864 to kill Apaches and claim land; he returned from his campaign with a ten-year-old Yaqui girl as his personal consort. Lucia Martinez bore the Colonel's children and harassment until his death in 1879. The territorial patriarch left his illegitimate children no inheritance, but he had indentured them, ironically making them eli­ gible for $1,000 from his estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Audit – Mexican American Studies Department – Tucson Unified School District
    Curriculum Audit of the Mexican American Studies Department Tucson Unified School District May 2, 2011 1 CAMBIUM LEARNING, INC. NATIONAL ACADEMIC EDUCATIONAL PARTNERS Curriculum Audit – Mexican American Studies Department – Tucson Unified School District Curriculum Audit of the Mexican American Studies Department Tucson Unified School District Tucson, Arizona Conducted Under the Auspices of Cambium Learning, Inc. in Collaboration with National Academic Educational Partnership 6625 Miami Lakes Drive, Suite 238 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Members of the Tucson Unified School District Audit Team: President, Cambium Learning, Inc. David F. Cappellucci Vice-President of Education Services, Cambium Learning, Inc. Christina Williams Chief Executive Officer, National Academic Educational Partnership Jeffrey J. Hernandez Senior Lead Auditor and Project Manager Luanne P. Nelson, M.Ed. Auditors Teri Casteel, M.Ed. Glenton Gilzean, M.S. Gershom Faulkner, M.S. 2 CAMBIUM LEARNING, INC. NATIONAL ACADEMIC EDUCATIONAL PARTNERS Curriculum Audit – Mexican American Studies Department – Tucson Unified School District 1. Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION 4 AUDIT PURPOSE 4 BACKGROUND 5 DISTRICT LEADERSHIP 6 CURRICULAR TIMELINE OF THE MEXICAN AMERICAN STUDIES DEPARTMENT PROGRAM COMMUNIQUÉ 10 II. METHODOLOGY 12 AUDIT BACKGROUND, STANDARDS, AND SCOPE OF WORK 12 OUTCOME MEASURES 18 III. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 18 OUTCOME MEASURE 1 18 OUTCOME MEASURE 2 43 OUTCOME MEASURE 3 50 IV. RECOMMENDATIONS 63 RECOMMENDATION 1 64 RECOMMENDATION 2 66 RECOMMENDATION 3 66 V. SUMMARY 67 APPENDIX 70 SUMMARY OF CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS – MEXICAN AMERICAN STUDIES DEPARTMENT 71 SUMMARY OF FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEWS 96 TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA SOURCES 107 MEXICAN AMERICAN STUDIES DEPARTMENT READING LIST 116 3 CAMBIUM LEARNING, INC. NATIONAL ACADEMIC EDUCATIONAL PARTNERS Curriculum Audit – Mexican American Studies Department – Tucson Unified School District Curriculum Audit of the Tucson Unified School District Mexican American Studies Department Tucson, Arizona I.
    [Show full text]
  • Azu Td 1322285 Sip1 M.Pdf
    PEST CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR NON- TRADITIONAL CROPS IN ARIZONA: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE NEEDS. Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Cross, Dale Robert. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 05/10/2021 08:44:15 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/274956 1322285 CROSS, DALE ROBERT PEST CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR NON-TRADITIONAL CROPS IN ARIZONA: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE NEEDS THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA M.S. 1983 University Microfilms International 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark V . 1. Glossy photographs or pages 2. Colored illustrations, paper or print 3. Photographs with dark background 4. Illustrations are poor copy 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of page 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several pages 8. Print exceeds margin requirements 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost in spine 10. Computer printout pages with indistinct print 11. Page(s) lacking when material received, and not available from school or author. 12. Page(s) seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows. 13. Two pages numbered .
    [Show full text]
  • List of Radio Stations in Arizona
    Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Search Wikipedia List of radio stations in Arizona From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page The following is a list of FCC-licensed radio stations in the U.S. state of Arizona, which can be Contents sorted by their call signs, frequencies, cities of license, licensees, and programming formats. Featured content Current events City of Call Random article Frequency license Licensee [1][2] Format Donate to Wikipedia sign [1][2] Wikipedia store KAAA 1230 AM Kingman Cameron Broadcasting, Inc. News/Talk/Information Interaction KAFF 930 AM Flagstaff Flagstaff Radio, Inc. Classic country Help KAFF- About Wikipedia 92.9 FM Flagstaff Flagstaff Radio, Inc. Country Community portal FM Recent changes KAFZ 99.7 FM Ash Fork Alex Media, Inc. Contact page KAHM 102.1 FM Prescott Phoenix Radio Broadcasting, LLC Easy Listening Tools Contemporary KAIC 88.9 FM Tucson Calvary Chapel of Tucson, Inc. What links here Christian Related changes Lake Contemporary Upload file KAIH 89.3 FM Educational Media Foundation Special pages Havasu City Christian open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com Permanent link KAIZ 105.5 FM Avondale Educational Media Foundation Worship music (Air1) Page information Camp Urban adult Wikidata item KAJM 104.3 FM Sierra H. Broadcasting, Inc. Cite this page Verde contemporary KALV- Pop contemporary hit Print/export 101.5 FM Phoenix Entercom License, LLC FM radio Create a book Download as PDF KAPR 930 AM Douglas Sonora Broadcasting, LLC Talk Printable version KASA 1540 AM Phoenix KASA Radio Hogar, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Leah Glaser's Thesis
    THE STORY OF GUADALUPE, ARIZONA: THE SURVIVAL AND PRESERVATION OF A YAQUI COMMUNITY by Leah S. Glaser A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY December 1996 ABSTRACT Guadalupe’s formation and persistence in the Phoenix area is a long overlooked topic of local history. Despite heavy residential, commercial, and industrial development, the once remote farm labor community has remained impervious to urban expansion. Residents have managed to preserve a degree of cultural and geographic separatism while participating in the economic and political structure of Phoenix’s dominant Anglo society. When late nineteenth century land reform policies of Mexican dictator Porfirio Diaz forced Yaquis from their homeland in Sonora, Mexico and threatened to kill them, Yaqui Indians fled to Arizona. Anglos there were sympathetic to their plight as refugees and Yaquis were able to find a niche in the Salt River Valley’s agricultural economy. Catholic and Presbyterian missionaries also supported the community and helped secure land for a legal townsite. But as immigrants and squatters, the political status of both Yaquis and Guadalupe was legally ambiguous. Meanwhile, many corporations set up labor camps, or “company towns,” the Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association established an exclusively Yaqui village that provided stability for the community’s sustenance and persistence. These factors combined with self identity, determination, and community consciousness to place the Yaqui community in a promising position for sustenance and longevity. By the 1960s, Guadalupe was no longer just a Yaqui community, but a Mexican-American as well. Whether by choice or by proximity, they joined Mexican-Americans in their fight for political voice and economic improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottsdale City Flag
    ITEM 17 Jagger, Carolyn From: Corsette, Kelly Sent: Friday, March 01, 2019 12:55 PM To: City Council Cc: Thompson, Jim; Washburn, Bruce; Scott, Sherry; Bladine, Janis; Jagger, Carolyn; Walker, Sharron; Nichols, Jeff; Stockwell, Brent Subject: March 5 City Flag Discussion Attachments: City Council Memo - March 5 flag disccussion.pdf To ensure compliance with the Open Meeting Law, recipients of this message should not forward it to other members of the public body. Members of the public body may reply to this message, but they should not send a copy of the reply to other members. Flonorable mayor and City Council members: No staff presentation is planned for the Tuesday March 5 City Council discussion of the Scottsdale city flag. In light of the negative response toward the new flag (much of which was based on the misunderstanding that it was replacing our iconic horse and rider logo), the attached memo and supporting documents provide a wider picture of public sentiment and comments about the different flag designs along with a summary of background and other information that may be helpful as you prepare for the discussion. Staff remains confident that with sustained communication about the new design and how it represents Scottsdale, the majority of residents would feel positive about the flag as a new element of our civic imagery, working alongside the city symbol and seal. Thank you, Kelly Corsette | Communications & Public Affairs Director City of Scottsdale | Office of Communication 480-312-2336 I [email protected] OFFICE OF COMMUNICATION Kelly Corsette, Communications & Public Affairs Director 3939 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the Arizona Archaeological Society
    May 2018 / Newsletter of the Arizona Archaeological Society PETROGLYPH Newsletter of the Arizona Archaeological Society Volume 54, Number 9 www.AzArchSoc.org May 2018 SAA APPEALS FOR SUPPORT: SAVE THE ANTIQUITIES ACT--STOP H.R. 3990 Congressman Rob Bishop, chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, is sponsoring a bill, HR 3990, the National Monument Creation and Protection Act, that would greatly restrict the ability of future presidents to establish National Monuments larger than 640 acres. It would require that any future large designations (between 10,000 and 85,000 acres) be approved by all affected state and local political entities. The measure would prohibit the creation of any new Marine National Monuments, and allow existing Monuments to be reduced in size. If enacted, this bill would essentially do away with one of the best methods we have for preserving our most valua- ble cultural and natural assets. H.R. 3990 has already been approved by the Natural Resources Committee. The next step is a vote in the full House. For more information on the implications of this bill, go to SAA.org and click on the Take Action Now tab. 45TH ANNUAL ARARA CONFERENCE GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO JUNE 1–4, 2018 To register, go to https://arara.wildapricot.org/ conference-Registration The ARARA conference is for everyone. If you enjoy rock art you should really come! Great speakers, fun people, wonderful field trips, workshops, a banquet, auctions, a wonderful vendor room, early morning meet- ings, and late night soirees. For more information, go to https://arara.wildapricot.org/Conference-Info Pre-registration closes on May 18th.
    [Show full text]
  • Hispanic Historic Property Survey I
    City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Office HHIISSPPAANNIICC HHIISSTTOORRIICC PPRROOPPEERRTTYY SSUURRVVEEYY Final Report Prepared by: David R. Dean, Ph.D. & Jean A. Reynolds, M.A. Athenaeum Public History Group City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Office Barbara Stocklin, Historic Preservation Officer Kevin Weight, Project Manager Athenaeum Public History Group David R. Dean, Ph.D. Jean A. Reynolds, M.A. Pete R. Dimas, Ph.D. Christine Marin, Ph.D. Santos Vega, Ph.D. Frank Barrios Julian Reveles Jared Smith, M.A. September 30, 2006 Rev. 0 Hispanic Historic Property Survey i A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S This survey of Hispanics in Phoenix is a product of the efforts of many. First of all, it is critical to acknowledge two team members who were instrumental in the successful completion of this project. Historians Dr. Christine Marin and Dr. Pete R. Dimas conducted research, oral interviews, and served as content reviewers, ensuring that both academic rigor and cultural sensitivity were maintained at each phase of the project. The team also included Community Outreach Specialists Frank Barrios, Dr. Santos Vega, and Julian Reveles. These individuals collected historical information, photographs, and conducted many interviews and one-on-one surveys with the community. Historian Jared Smith also contributed important research for the report. Other community members such as Connie Meza, Frank Valenzuela, Monique Cordova, Margot Cordova, and many others, also provided information to the project. Without the efforts of the entire team, this project could not have been accomplished. Secondly, it is important to thank the City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Office for initiating this study in order to preserve the cultural history of Phoenix, as much as its physical buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • APW August 2012 NEWSLETTER
    !ugust 2012 TypeRider !rizona Press Women Congratulate NFPW on 75th Anniversary Two ways to reduce eadline is Now! NFPW conference fees here are two opportunities for APW Tmembers to save on registration fees for the NFPW Conference held September 20 through 22 at the Hotel Valley Ho in Scottsdale. For starters, APW members who are volunteering to work at the NFPW Conference must register, but they are not required to pay the registration fee. onference fees, see Page 4 !y Brenda Warneka ecome a part of history by $10 cost per name will go to the Get on the us !including your name in the conference program fund and 2012 NFPW 75th anniversary half will benefit the NFPW conference program, which will Education Fund. be given to all registrants at the All payments should be sent by conference in September and Aug. 1 to NFPW Lockbox Mail, will become part of the official P.O. !ox 34798, Alexandria, archives of NFPW and APW. VA 22334-0798. To use a APW members may honor the credit card, call Gloria Watkins NFPW 75th anniversary by at 800-780-2715 or fax the card A day tour takes you to the Desert submitting half-page, black- number to 703-237-9808. Indi- Botanical Gardens. Photo courtesy of and-white ads for the viduals must indicate how they Desert Botanical Gardens. wish their names to be listed. conference program. The cost is !y Glennis McNeal $75 for a 5-inch wide by 4-inch The half-page ads must be sent s hard as it is to believe, some deep ad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phoenix Phabulous History Mural Carol A
    About Phoenix Phabulous Experience Phoenix Phabulous Experience™ is a placemaking and storytelling organization designed to bring people and cultures together to celebrate the urban core of Phoenix – showcasing the sixth-largest city in the United States through storytelling, art and technology. Phoenix Phabulous Experience™ encourages civic engagement and family-friendly fun, forging community-based collaboration through its production and community dialogues. President and Executive Producer The Phoenix Phabulous History Mural Carol A. Poore, Ph.D., founded Phoenix Phabulous Experience™ in 2012 to incubate much-needed placemaking experiences for Phoenix, Arizona USA, a city featuring rapid growth as well as challenges associated with developing urban identity. Her research indicated that Phoenix needs a shared community story for residents and visitors. Phoenix Phabulous Experience delivers a unique community storytelling experience that connects, celebrates and showcases the city’s distinct history, art and cultures, attributes, and vision for the future. Carol has built a strong community coalition of Phoenix Phabulous Experience collaborators. In 2013, she launched a community storytelling event with the help of historians and signa- ture storytellers, leading to the production and debut of the Phoenix History Mural in 2014. This art collec- tion is the beginning of other game-changing civic and street-level experiences for Downtown Phoenix. The Phoenix Phabulous History Mural features nine Mural Curator time periods of Phoenix, each artistically represented in a Hugo Medina served as curator of the Phoenix Phabulous History Mural. He collection of indoor murals. The project was produced by directed a team of 16 mural artists who each studied a Phoenix time period to understand landmark events in the ancient and modern history of Phoenix, as well Phoenix Phabulous Experience™ with storytelling collabora- as the envisioned future of Phoenix.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Pre-K - 12 Grade Education
    FUNDING PRE-K - 12 GRADE EDUCATION 110 TH ARIZONA TOWN HALL CONTRIBUTORS JOHN ARNOLD WHITNEY CHAPA REPORT EDITOR EMJAYE COFFMAN DICK FOREMAN KENDRA PELOFSKE DR. JOSEPH MARTIN DESIGN DIRECTOR JULIE NEWBERG KRIS OKAZAKI KARLA PHILLIPS DR. JOHN REYHNER EILEEN SIGMUND RANDIE STEIN RESEARCH COMMITTEE SUSAN GOLDSMITH JAY KITTLE CHAIR VICE CHAIR JOHN ARNOLD MARY GRIER PATRICIA NORRIS PAUL BRIERLEY JIM HOLWAY ELIZABETH PAULUS ARLAN COLTON TARA JACKSON HANK PECK PENNY DAVIS KENT JOHNSON KELLY POWELL KIMBERLY DEMARCHI JAY KITTLE FRED ROSENFELD LINDA ELLIOTT-NELSON PAUL KOEHLER JIM ROUNDS PEARL CHANG ESAU JONATHAN KOPPELL CHAD SAMPSON CHRISTY FARLEY RITA MAGUIRE DAVID SNIDER DICK FOREMAN ELIZABETH MCNAMEE MARK SWEENEY DAVID GARCIA PATRICK MCWHORTOR WILL VOIT TANNYA GAXIOLA JEFF MILLER MARISA WALKER SUSAN GOLDSMITH RAY NEWTON DEVAN WASTCHAK RICHARD GORDON RICH NICKEL LARRY WOODS SPONSORS OF THE 110TH STATEWIDE ARIZONA TOWN HALL The legislature shall enact such laws as shall provide for the establishment and maintenance of a general and uniform public school system ... Article XI, Section 1 The Arizona Constitution CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 3 K-12 STATISTICAL OVERVIEW 9 K-12 ORGANIZATIONAL OVERVIEW 13 MEASURING PERFORMANCE 23 A SYSTEM BASED ON SCHOOL CHOICE 29 SCHOOL FINANCE 47 SCHOOL CAPITAL 52 ARIZONA CHARTER SCHOOLS 57 ARIZONA’S AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS 59 TEACHER SHORTAGES AND SALARIES 65 FULL-DAY KINDERGARTEN 67 PRESCHOOL 69 ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES FOR SCHOOLS 73 SPECIAL EDUCATION IN ARIZONA 81 PERFORMANCE FUNDING 85 ENDNOTES 87 REFERENCES 89 APPENDIX A: EDUCATION AND THE ARIZONA CONSTITUTION THE OUTCOMES WE WANT By Dick Foreman Arizona has for years identified its wants, expectations and even demands for public education in numerous reports and findings; some of the most influential are listed in the resource citations at the end of this chapter.
    [Show full text]