DOCSLIB.ORG

The Destruction of Heritage Sites in the Middle East

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Destruction of Heritage Sites in the Middle East The Destruction of Heritage Sites in the Middle East Lauren Liotti 2016 Overview Overview Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property Motivation • Ideological • Salafism • Political • Erasure of culture • Sensational • Media Coverage • Financial Results • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f83i5k6EgTs&i ndex=5&list=PLAtfWAdHzWmBiIJ- evsIWulgCr8w8uS0n/ Destruction in Iraq Fall of Mosul List of World Heritage Sites in Iraq The Fall of Mosul • June 10th-14th 2014 • City in Northern Iraq • ISIS released a video showing members using sledgehammers to smash some of the city’s ancient artifacts • Overnight, the city was transformed and sharia law was imposed Destruction of the Library • February 2015 • 100,000 books and manuscripts destroyed Destruction in Syria Site of Palmyra List of World Heritage Sites in Syria Destruction of the Site of Palmyra • http://www.theguardian.com/world/ng- interactive/2016/apr/08/palmyra-after-islamic- state-isis-visual-guide • Report of the UNESCO Rapid Assessment Mission to the World Heritage “Site of Palmyra” Syrian Arab Republic, 23-27 April 2016 Other Heritage Sites Aleppo Role of the UN UNESCO UNESCO • United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization • “contribute to peace and security by promoting international collaboration through education, science, and culture” • 21 May 2015 Resolution • 40th World Heritage Committee Session Unite4Heritage Sustainable Development Goal 16 Goal 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions UNDP: “Peace, stability, human rights and effective governance are important conduits for sustainable development” Solutions • Unfortunately, where ISIL still holds territory with heritage sites, not much can be done • The work of UNESCO and other organizations like the Global Heritage Fund is making progress in restoration and prevention Thank you “We are one humanity…In any culture there are outstanding objects and sites of outstanding universal value.” -Irina Bokova Citations • Barnard, Anne, and Hwaida Saad. “Palmyra Temple Was Destroyed by ISIS, U.N. Confirms.” New York Times [New York] 31 Aug. 2015: n. pag. New York Times. Web. 27 July 2016. • Bokova, Irina. “Culture Under Fire.” New York Times [New York] 6 Apr. 2012: n. pag. New York Times. Web. 27 July 2016. • Gladstone, Rick, and Maher Samaan. “ISIS Destroys More Artifacts in Syria and Iraq.” New York Times [New York] 3 July 2015: n. pag. New York Times. Web. 27 July 2016. • Gonzalez, Susan. “We All Have a Stake in Protecting Cultural Heritage, Says UNESCO Director-General.” YaleNews [New Haven] 12 Apr. 2016: n. pag. YaleNews. Web. 27 July 2016. • ISIS Culturally Cleansing the Middle East: UNESCO Director. By RT. Youtube. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 July 2016. • ISIS Destroys Mosul Museum Artifacts. By Youtube/Islamic State. New York Times. New York Times Company, 26 Feb. 2015. Web. 27 July 2016. • “Islamic State Group: Crisis in Seven Charts.” BBC. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 July 2016. Citations • Kramer, Andrew E., and Sewell Chan. “When Cultural Heritage Is Caught in the Cross Hairs.” New York Times [New York] 18 May 2016: n. pag. New York Times. Web. 27 July 2016. • Mackey, Robert. “Historians Pore Over ISIS Video of Smashed Statues for Clues to What’s Been Lose.” New York Times [New York] 26 Feb. 2015: n. pag. New York Times. Web. 27 July 2016. • “Site of Palmyra.” UNESCO. UNESCO World Heritage Centre, n.d. Web. 27 July 2016. • Syrian Arab Republic. Report of the UNESCO Rapid Assessment Mission to the World Heritage “Site of Palmyra.” N.p.: UNESCO, 2016. Digital file. • “UNESCO Experts Take Preliminary Stock of Destruction in World Heritage Site of Palmyra.” UNESCO. UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 27 Apr. 2016. Web. 27 July 2016. • #Unite4Heritage: The Story so Far. By UNESCO. Youtube. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 July 2016. • The War on Syria’s History. New York Times. New York Times Company, 17 May 2016. Web. 27 July 2016..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Westminsterresearch the Touch of Iconoclasm Pitcher, B
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch The Touch of Iconoclasm Pitcher, B. This is a copy of the accepted author manuscript of the following article: Pitcher, B. (2018) The Touch of Iconoclasm, European Journal of Cultural Studies, First Published April 10, 2018, DOI: 10.1177/1367549418761794. The final definitive version is available from the publisher Sage at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367549418761794 © The Author(s) 2018 The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: ((http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] The touch of iconoclasm – European Journal of Cultural Studies Title: The touch of iconoclasm Abstract: This article reflects on some depicted, intentional acts of iconoclasm undertaken by Isis in Northern Iraq, and viewed as online videos. It attempts to consider what makes these moving images compelling to audiences who share an orientation to the protection and preservation of ancient artefacts. In doing so it prompts a reflection on their circulation as part of stories that get told about cultural heritage, and particularly the simple civilizational oppositions that get set up between ‘Western’ and ‘Islamic’ culture. Centring on the significance of the sensation of touch to practices of cultural inscription, it suggests that the Northern Iraq videos animate forms of synaesthesic material engagement that are denied by the modernist technologies of museum culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Articolo Alessio RE.Pdf
    [email protected] The birth of the world mobilization for protecting our heritage The need to implement specific rules aimed at protecting and preserving cultural heritage, for its universal values, and its capacity to address recovery and peace making process, is an increasingly evident issue, posed by the continuous intensification of threats brought by conflicts and disasters in various areas of the world. In 1945, at the end of World War II, UNESCO, the United Nations Organization for Education, Science and Culture, was established, with the precise purpose to spread the culture of peace. And, a few years later, in 1954, a milestone in the field of international law was approved: the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (also known as the Hague Convention), aimed at addressing the problem of the devastation of cultural heritage from armed conflicts. The theme of protecting cultural heritage has therefore gradually taken on an increasingly importance within the international community's agenda in the 1960s, thanks to a number of international campaigns for aid mobilization. The first of them was the one for the saving of the temples of Abu Simbel and Philae in Egypt, at risk of being lost as a result of the construction of the Aswan dam: 50 different countries contributed for the dismantling and moving of the temples. Other very famous cases were the ones of Borubdur in Indonesia and Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan. Campaigns that in Italy found certainly the most significant situations in the rescue operations of Florence and Venice, both hit by the floods in November 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCO's Response to Protect Culture in Crises
    UNESCO’S RESPONSE TO PROTECT CULTURE IN CRISES UNITE4HERITAGE 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 6 7 Culture implies more than just monuments and stones – culture defines who we are. It carries universal values and the many faces of our shared humanity. 8 It is the wellspring of collective imagination, memory and belonging. It is a source of resilience, well-being and social cohesion. It is a force for recovery, creativity and innovation. (1) View of the World Heritage site of the Citadel Laferrière, Haiti. © Elke Selter (2) View of the World Heritage site of the When peoples’ cultures are threatened, when their heritage is Old City of Sana’a, Yemen. deliberately attacked, when their cultural rights are violated, © UNESCO/Maria Gropa (3) Timbuktu, December 05, 2013 – A we must respond with more culture, more knowledge, more resident walks by Djingarey Berre Mosque, one of three UNESCO World Heritage unity. When culture is at the frontline of crisis, it must also be mosques of Timbuktu, North of Mali. on the frontline of recovery and peace-building. © MINUSMA/Marco Dormino (4) Children in Ramallah, Palestine, at an event held in the framework of the Development can not be sustainable without culture and #Unite4Heritage Campaign. © UNESCO (5) UNESCO’s Director-General, Ms Irina there can be no lasting peace without respect for cultural Bokova, with students at the launch event of the #Unite4Heritage campaign at Baghdad diversity and artistic freedom. University, Iraq, on 28 March 2015. © UNESCO (6) World Heritage site of Leptis Magna, Protecting culture and heritage means protecting people.
    [Show full text]
  • HERITAGE EMERGENCY FUND Annual Progress Report HERITAGE EMERGENCY FUND
    2018 HERITAGE EMERGENCY FUND Annual Progress Report HERITAGE EMERGENCY FUND HERITAGE EMERGENCY FUND GEOGRAPHIC COVERAGE 2016-2018 EUROPE AND ARAB STATES NORTH AMERICA Iraq * Croatia Jordan Serbia * Lebanon * Turkey * Libya * Syrian Arab Republic * Beneficiaries through in-country operations Yemen * Beneficiaries through external activities * Beneficiaries in 2018 2 2018 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ASIA AND THE PACIFIC LATIN AMERICA AFRICA Afghanistan AND THE CARIBBEAN Angola Bhutan * Botswana Niger * India * Antigua and Barbuda * Cameroon * Nigeria * Indonesia * Brazil * Chad * Senegal * Islamic Republic of Iran * Colombia * Comoros * Togo * Lao People’s Democratic Republic * Dominica Côte d’Ivoire * Uganda * Federated States of Micronesia Ecuador Democratic Republic of the Congo Zambia * Myanmar Haiti Kenya * Zimbabwe Nepal * Jamaica * Malawi * Tonga * Mexico * Mali * Vanuatu * Peru Mauritius Saint Kitts and Nevis * Mozambique Saint Lucia * 3 We thank our donors: DÉLÉGATION PERMANENTE DE LA PRINCIPAUTÉ DE MONACO AUPRÈS DE L’UNESCO And all the individuals who supported the Heritage Emergency Fund Published in 2019 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France © UNESCO, March 2019 This report is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this report, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http:// www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • S/PV.7907 Maintenance of International Peace and Security 24/03/2017
    United Nations S/ PV.7907 Security Council Provisional Seventy-second year 7907th meeting Friday, 24 March 2017, 10 a.m. New York President: Mr. Rycroft/Mr. Wilson ........................... (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) Members: Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ..................... Mr. Llorentty Solíz China ......................................... Mr. Liu Jieyi Egypt ......................................... Mr. Aboulatta Ethiopia ....................................... Mr. Alemu France ........................................ Ms. Azoulay Italy .......................................... Mr. Amendola Japan ......................................... Mr. Minami Kazakhstan .................................... Mr. Umarov Russian Federation ............................... Mr. Zagaynov Senegal ....................................... Mr. Seck Sweden ....................................... Mr. Skoog Ukraine ....................................... Mr. Yelchen ko United States of America .......................... Ms. Sison Uruguay ....................................... Mr. Rosselli Agenda Maintenance of international peace and security Destruction and trafficking of cultural heritage by terrorist groups and in situations of armed conflict This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the translation of speeches delivered in other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only. They should
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Cultural Heritage an Imperative for Humanity
    PROTECTING CULTURAL HERITAGE AN IMPERATIVE FOR HUMANITY ACTING TOGETHER AGAINST DESTRUCTION AND TRAFFICKING OF CULTURAL PROPERTY BY TERRORIST AND ORGANIZED CRIME GROUPS United Nations 22 September 2016 PROTECTING CULTURAL HERITAGE: An Imperative for Humanity “Cultural heritage is a reflection of human history, civilization and the coexistence of multiple peoples and their ways of life. Its protection is a shared responsibility of the international community, in the interest of future generations.” Paolo Gentiloni, Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Italy “Decades from now, generations will judge us by the courage we showed and actions we took to preserve their and our heritage and culture. Preserving this heritage is the collective duty of this generation to many generations to come.” Nasser Judeh, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates of Jordan “As conflicts remain aflame across the world, we must join forces to protect cultural heritage from illicit trafficking, the collateral damage of war and intentional destruction. Culture is a catalyst for dialogue, reconciliation and peace – it must become part of peacebuilding, built early into security and humanitarian considerations.” Irina Bokova, Director-General of UNESCO “Effective cooperation at the national and international levels among different stakeholders is crucial to protecting and preserving our shared cultural heritage, as well as ending all forms of trafficking in cultural property.” Yury Fedotov, Executive Director of UNODC “Member states can act to deter the demand for illicitly obtained cultural heritage items in destination markets. It is our duty to protect the cultural heritage of mankind, as the most amazing symbol of our past, in order to protect our future.” Jürgen Stock, Secretary General of INTERPOL 2 PROTECTING CULTURAL HERITAGE: An Imperative for Humanity CONTENTS BACKGROUND 6 SUGGESTED KEY ACTIONS 12 A.
    [Show full text]
  • GA31.8 MIN GA 30 FINAL ENG Ca
    XXXI General Assembly ICCROM GA31/2019 30-31 October 2019 Rome, Italy Document GA31/8: For Approval Title: Minutes of the 30 th Session of the General Assembly Summary The minutes of the 30 th session of the General Assembly, held in Rome form 29 November to 1 December 2017, are tabled for approval by the 31 st General Assembly. These minutes were circulated to the General Assembly participants in 2018, at which time, any corrections necessary were made to the document. Action required The General Assembly approves the Minutes of the XXX Session of the General Assembly. 2 ICCROM - GA 30 ROD & Provisional Minutes 3 Table of Contents A. SUMMARY RECORD OF DECISIONS .............................................................................. 5 Agenda Item 1. Official Inauguration .......................................................................................................... 5 Agenda Item 2. Opening of the Exhibit. Palmyra: Rising from Destruction.......................................... 5 Agenda Item 3. Election of the President and Three Vice-Presidents for the XXX Session of the General Assembly ................................................................................................................................... 5 Agenda Item 4. Election of the Committees ............................................................................................... 5 Agenda Item 5. Acceptance of the Observers ............................................................................................. 5 Agenda Item 6. Adoption
    [Show full text]
  • For Peer Review Only
    International Journal of Heritage Studies For Peer Review Only Heritage destruction in Myanmar’s Rakhine state; legal and illegal iconoclasm Journal: International Journal of Heritage Studies Manuscript ID RJHS-2019-0219 Manuscript Type: Original Article Heritage destruction, Myanmar, UNESCO, Iconoclasm, Rohingya Keywords: genocide URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjhs Page 1 of 31 International Journal of Heritage Studies 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 For Peer Review Only 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Map of Myanmar 46 47 209x297mm (150 x 150 DPI) 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rjhs International Journal of Heritage Studies Page 2 of 31 1 2 3 Heritage destruction in Myanmar’s Rakhine state; legal and illegal iconoclasm 4 5 6 7 In this article we map heritage destruction in Myanmar’s Rakhine state. We outline 8 the historic and contemporary political context in Myanmar explaining the 9 10 background of the Rohingya Muslim ethnic group and addressing the contribution of 11 religion and political change to anti-Rohingya discrimination and violence in 12 Myanmar. We trace patterns of heritage destruction as legal and/or illegal iconoclasm 13 and specify the key elements of heritage destruction in Rakhine state. Our analysis 14 focusses on the use of heritage destruction in Rakhine state as a tool of genocide, and 15 16 we suggest that heritage destruction in Myanmar’s Rakhine state ought to be 17 understoodFor as part thePeer authorities’ Review policies of genocide Only against the Rohingya.
    [Show full text]
  • (CHI): Planning for Safeguarding Heritage Sites in Syria and Iraq1
    Heritage Initiatives (CHI): Planning for Safeguarding Heritage Sites in Syria and Iraq1 NEA-PSHSS-14-001 Weekly Report 34 — March 30, 2015 Michael D. Danti, Scott Branting, Cheikhmous Ali, Tate Paulette, Allison Cuneo, Kathryn Franklin, and David Elitzer Executive Summary During the reporting period, ASOR CHI Co-director Dr. Scott Branting and the ASOR CHI Geospatial Team and UNITAR-UNOSAT completed initial analyses of high-resolution satellite imagery from early March showing the Northwest Palace at Nimrud (ancient Kalhu) in Iraq. These two independent analyses found evidence for likely intentional destruction at the north end of the Northwest Palace (see image below), presumably by ISIL militants, but this remains to be confirmed. In the satellite imagery, ASOR CHI and UNITAR-UNOSAT note evidence for damage to the standing architecture of the Northwest Palace and the probable intentional destruction of architectural relief sculpture at the site. Two debris fields visible at the north end of the palace may indicate the removal of sculptures from inside the palace for performative deliberate destruction (presumably for an ISIL video). Tire tracks left by heavy machinery are visible inside the main entrance to the throne room, and the lintel of the entrance leading through the modern curtain wall to the throne room has been destroyed, probably by heavy machinery. There is also concern that there could be additional damage, done by hand, below the shed roof that would not be visible in the satellite imagery. In Syria, the UNESCO World Heritage Site Ancient City of Bosra has been exposed to increased risk of combat damage following intense fighting in the area and the capture of Bosra by rebel forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Palmyra Rise Again? - War Crimes Against Cultural Heritage and Post-War Reconstruction
    Will Palmyra rise again? - War Crimes against Cultural Heritage and Post-war Reconstruction Christoph Doppelhofer∗ e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The destruction of cultural heritage in North-West Africa and the Middle East beginning with the start of civil wars after the so-called `Arab Spring' has been devastating. Centuries and millennia old archaeological sites and historic cities are demolished through combat, looting or wanton destruction. Thereby, the intentional destruction of cultural heritage is considered to be a war crime because of its severe effects on identity and cultural capital of a population. How dearly those lost cultural treasures are already missed, is shown in the almost instant debate whether or not destroyed heritage should be reconstructed or not with equally valid arguments on both sides. Many concerns are focused on practical issues such as the sheer financial costs of adequate reconstruction. However, one matter seems to be overrepresented within this discussion: authenticity of reconstructions or the lack thereof. Therefore, this paper aims to examine the role of authenticity of post-war reconstructions, explore ethical implications and discuss the potential of reconstructions as means of post-war regeneration. Keywords: cultural heritage, iconoclasm, authenticity, identity, post-war reconstruction, Syria. 1 Introduction The increased presence of Islamic terror organisations beginning with the so-called `Arab Spring', created not only terror and violence against civilians but also against cultural heritage became a sad routine in the Middle East and many parts of Africa. From Sufi and Sheikh tombs in Mali and Egypt to entire World Heritage Sites such as Nimrud, Hatra and Palmyra { nothing seems to be safe from wanton destruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Ill-Gotten Gains: a Response to the Islamic State’S Profits from the Illicit Antiquities Market
    ILL-GOTTEN GAINS: A RESPONSE TO THE ISLAMIC STATE’S PROFITS FROM THE ILLICIT ANTIQUITIES MARKET Hannah D. Willett* The illicit antiquities market is a thriving international enterprise that has the potential to fuel wide-scale criminal and terrorist activity. Nonetheless, the economic and symbolic impact of cultural property exploitation has been largely overlooked. This Note explores the role that the illegal antiquities market can and does play in facilitating terrorist activities, particularly in ISIS-controlled areas of the Middle East. It addresses the regulatory obstacles uniquely inherent to the trade of cultural property, and examines international, national, and online intermediary responses to looting and the market. Finally, this Note proposes a multi-faceted, counteractive response to the trade. First, the Note highlights the potential for online intermediaries to serve as powerful choke points. It then draws attention to the undertheorized and underutilized mechanisms of U.S. domestic law that are readily employable to combat the illicit trade. Lastly, this Note emphasizes the important function that education can have in reducing consumer demand, and consequently, in disincentivizing participation at every step along the trade. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 832 I. ISIS AND THE TRADE ........................................................................................ 833 II. REGULATORY OBSTACLES ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reshaping Cultural Heritage Protection Policies at a Time of Securitisation: France, Italy, and the United Kingdom
    THE INTERNATIONAL SPECTATOR, 2018 VOL. 50, NO. 3, 86–101 https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2018.1467161 Reshaping Cultural Heritage Protection Policies at a Time of Securitisation: France, Italy, and the United Kingdom Paolo Foradori a , Serena Giusti b and Alessandro Giovanni Lamonica b a University of Trento ; b Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies , Pisa ABSTRACT KEYWORDS In the context of the increasing securitisation of cultural heritage, Securitisation ; foreign policy ; France, Italy, and the United Kingdom have reacted diff erently to the cultural diplomacy ; cultural recent wave of iconoclasm perpetrated by the Islamic State of Iraq and heritage ; terrorism Syria (ISIS) and similar radical groups and terrorist organisations. With cultural heritage now discursively identifi ed as a security concern, the three states enacted security practices to deal with the newly emerged security threats. All three cases show a tight association between the protection of cultural heritage, development and security policies. State-driven cultural heritage protection policies continue to be designed around the notion of multilateral cooperation, although innovative forms of public-private multilateralism and civil-military cooperation are increasingly being introduced. Deliberate and systemic attacks on cultural heritage have become a common feature of contemporary warfare. Th is is especially the case in confl icts in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, where religion-inspired radical groups such as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS, also known as Daesh) have resorted to iconoclasm as part of a well-planned tactic to assert their absolute domination over the population of a territory that has come under their control, including the social and cultural context in which that population lives.
    [Show full text]