Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire Anne Norton yale university press new haven & london Copyright © 2004 by Anne Norton. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Designed by Rebecca Gibb. Set in Janson text type by Integrated Publishing Solutions. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Norton, Anne. Leo Strauss and the politics of American empire / Anne Norton. p. cm. Includes index. isbn 0-300-10436-7 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Strauss, Leo. 2. Conservatism—United States. 3. United States—Intellectual life—20th century. 4. Political science—Philosophy. 5. Political science— History. I. Title. JC251.S8N67 2004 320´.092—dc22 2004010799 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Interpretation Leg’ ich mich aus, so leg’ ich mich hinein: Ich Kann nicht selbst mein Interprete sein. Doch wer nur steigt auf seiner eignen Bahn, Trägt auch mein Bild zu hellerm Licht hinan. Friedrich Nietzsche Interpreting myself, I always read Myself into my books. I clearly need Some help. But all who climb on their own way Carry my image, too, into the breaking day. (Translated by Walter Kaufmann) Contents preface ix acknowlegments xiii Prelude 1 1 Who Is Leo Strauss? What Is a Straussian? 5 2 The Lion and the Ass 21 3 Decline into the West 35 4 Closing the American Mind 57 5 Getting the Natural Right 75 6 Persecution and the Art of Writing 95 7 Ancients and Moderns 109 8 The Statesman 127 9 On Tyranny 141 10 Conservatism Abandoned 161 11 The Sicilian Expedition 181 12 Athens and Jerusalem 201 13 The School of Baghdad 221 index 229 viii Preface I am the student of Joseph Cropsey, who was the student of Leo Strauss, with whom he edited the History of Political Philosophy. I am the student of Ralph Lerner, who was the student of Strauss. I studied with Leon Kass and watched Allan Bloom teach. I know many Straussians, and some of the students of Strauss, very well. Because I am bound within those networks, I know others linked to them. I write this book because I have debts to pay and ghosts to lay, and because I was made, somewhat against my will, the carrier of an oral history. From the time that I first came to the University of Chicago, professors took me aside to tell me stories of Strauss and the Straussians. I did not ask for these stories, and I often wondered why my professors told them to me. If they wanted to tell me sto- ries, I preferred others. Joe Cropsey told me stories about his ix Preface campaigns in the deserts of North Africa and the invasion of Italy. Leonard Binder told me of the 1948 war and the fighting in Jerusalem. Ari Zolberg had stories of being a Jewish child in Bel- gium and the Netherlands: of being almost caught, and saved again in the most generous and improbable ways during the war; then after, of such comparatively trivial hardships as eating eggs cooked in peanut butter. Like the military men of my childhood they told these stories very lightly. The war as Cropsey told it had intervened to spare him the fate—more feared if not more fearsome—of writing his dissertation on a subject that had gone cold for him. In Zolberg’s account, the chief of police provided false papers, Jesuit priests hid Jewish children, German soldiers warned of Nazi sweeps. Binder laughed about the Arabic he learned as a prisoner. They told me these things, and they talked to me about philosophy and revolution, but more often they told me about Strauss and the Straussians. Cropsey told me how he had returned from the war to have Strauss teach him, as he said, how to read. Zolberg told me of the Straussian truth squads and the conflicts in the department. Binder told me of Strauss’s insistence on being taken to seminars in anthropology, with their slides of scantily clad natives and ac- counts of exotic sexual practices. As one professor saw me taken into another’s office, he (they were all men then, all but Susanne Rudolph, who never did this sort of thing) would find me and tell me to come and talk to him, or take me in on the spot and tell me his account of what he x Preface imagined the other had told me. After a while I realized that the stories I heard without real interest were very much sought after by other students, even by other professors. Though I didn’t value the stories, I did take pleasure in being set apart. If I was not curious about Strauss, I began to be curious about his circle: about the desire of my professors and the older students to tell me stories, to make sure that I had their version, to warn me of one another. I was curious about the passion they brought to these stories, and the effort they took to convey both the passion and the stories to me. I saw no reason for it at the time. In the years afterward I forgot many of the stories. I saw Straussians often enough. They were my professors and fellow students first; later they were colleagues, members of another school of thought in political theory, a school I knew but whose views I did not share. I would never have thought of writing about them, but things changed. Certain of the people I had known came to power. The nation went to war. Because the na- tion is at war, and because the Straussians are prominent among those who govern, the accounts I had been given are no longer part of a curious personal history but elements of a common legacy. In remembering that past, I came to see the shapes of two futures. xi Acknowledgments This is a book I chose to write, but I was asked to write it. The idea for the book, and many suggestions along the way, came from John Kulka, my editor at Yale University Press. John con- ceived the book, persuaded me to do it, shaped and shepherded it. I’m grateful to him for our conversations, for his help, and for his commitment. I am also grateful for the detailed and percep- tive comments on the proposal from an anonymous reader for the Press, and to Dan Heaton for his editing. Many people helped me in writing this book. Some I can thank; in other cases, I think my thanks would be a burden and so a poor return for all their help. I may not place people in the right camp, and I apologize. Jeff Tulis told me to study with Cropsey when I first went to Chicago. Deborah Harrold took many of the same classes and remembered the people and the stories. Rogers Smith, Victoria xiii Acknowledgments Hattam, Ellen Kennedy, Mary Ann Gallagher, and George Shul- man read the manuscript on very short notice and generously provided crucial and invaluable advice. I am indebted to them for their friendship above all, and for many other things, but no one should make the mistake of thinking that they agree with all that I have written. Eric Feigenbaum was a superb research assis- tant. The Franke Center for the Humanities at the University of Chicago provided me with the opportunity to present an abridged version of the book to an informed, critically acute, and welcom- ing audience. The Alfred L. Cass Term Chair provided funds for research. I regret any trouble that comes to anyone for their in- volvement with me, and that I cannot fully acknowledge all the people on whom I relied. xiv Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire Prelude From outside the circle of the Straussians, their influence ap- pears like a triumphant freemasonry, a kabbalistic circle, a troop of intellectual Templars directing (largely from behind the scenes) an unsophisticated and parochial Court. From within, the influ- ence of the Straussians reads differently: as the ascendance of virtue, the reward of patience, the presence of a generous philoso- phy in politics, the triumph of the tough-minded. Outside the academy, the questions raised in political theory seem to have been cultivated in an academic hothouse: fragile, ornamental, and unproductive, unsuited to the rough climate of the world outside. From within they seem like grenades, smooth and hard, ready to launch death and destruction, ready to tear the world apart. Three stories are interwoven here. There is the story of Leo 1 Prelude Strauss, a philosopher of the University in Exile, who taught American students a new way (that was a very old way) to read a text, who carried European philosophy into a new world. Then there is the story of the Straussians, which is properly two sto- ries: the story of the philosophic lineage that came from Leo Strauss, and the story of a set of students taking that name, re- garded by others—and regarding themselves—as a chosen set of initiates into a hidden teaching.