DOCSLIB.ORG

Republic of Serbia Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Republic of Serbia Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure stra REPUBLIC OF SERBIA MINISTRY OF CONSTRUCTION, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT ON THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SPATIAL PLAN OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA FOR THE PERIOD BETWEEN 2021 AND 2035 – Draft – Belgrade, March 2021 REPORT ON THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SPATIAL PLAN OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA FOR THE PERIOD BETWEEN 2021 AND 2035 – Draft – Holder of the development: MINISTRY OF CONSTRUCION, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Developers: INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN AND SPATIAL PLANNING OF SERBIA Director __________________________________ Sasa Milijic, PhD, Scientific Adviser UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE FACULTY OF GEOGRAPHY Dean _______________________________ Prof. Dejan Filipovic, PhD Work team: Bosko Josimovic, PhD, Spatial Planner (objectives and indicators, evaluation of planning solutions, protection measures, guidelines for the impact assessment on lower hierarchical levels, methodology, outline of decision-making) Prof. Dejan Filipovic, PhD, Spatial Planner (bases, monitoring) Marina Nenkovic-Riznic, PhD, Spatial Planner (objectives and indicators, evaluation of alternative solutions) Prof. Marina Ilic, PhD, Technology Engineer (objectives and indicators, evaluation of planning solutions, protection measures) Prof. Aleksandar Jovovic, PhD, Mechanical Engineer (evaluation of planning solutions, protection measures) Prof. Aleksandar Cvjetic, PhD, Mining Engineer (evaluation of planning solutions, protection measures) Milan Paunovic, PhD, Biologist (evaluation of planning solutions, protection measures) Ljubisa Bezbradica, MA in Forestry Engineering (evaluation of planning solutions, protection measures) 2 CONTENTS 1. BASIS OF THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT…….. 5 1.1. Overview of the content and objectives of the Plan and its connection to other plans. 6 1.1.1. Overview of the content of the Spatial Plan………………………………………. 7 1.1.2. Description of the Plan’s objectives………………………………………….......... 20 1.1.3. Connection with other documents…………………………………...…………….. 23 1.2. An overview of the current environmental status and quality of the area covered by the report ……………………………………………………………………………. 26 1.2.1. Air quality…………………………………………………………………………. 26 1.2.2. Water quality………………………...……….………………………………….. .. 33 1.2.3. Soil quality………………………………………………………………................ 40 1.2.4. Noise levels……………………………………………………………………....... 43 1.3. Environmental characteristics of the areas for which there is a possibility of exposure to significant impact ………………………………………………………….. 45 1.4. Environmental protection issues and problems discussed in the plan and the outline of the reasons for the omission of certain issues and problems from the 48 assessment procedure ………………………………………………………………. 1.5. Outline and assessment of alternative solutions related to environmental protection 49 in the Spatial Plan ..................................................................................................................... 1.6. Results of previous consultation with interested authorities and organizations ……. 49 2. GENERAL AND SPECIFIC GOALS OF THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CHOICE OF INDICATORS ................................... 55 2.1 General and specific objectives …………………………………………………………. 55 2.2. Choice of indicators ............................................................................................................ 55 3. ASSESSMENT OF POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS …………………….. 58 3.1 Impact assessment of alternative solutions and the reasons for the choice of the most favorable alternative …………………………………………………………………… 59 3.3. Evaluation of the characteristics and the importance of the impact of planning 70 solutions………………. 80 3.4. Cumulative and synergetic impacts ………………………………………………….. 82 3.5. Characteristics and importance of the impact of planning solutions ........................... 3.6. Description of guidelines for the prevention and reduction of negative impacts and 90 the increase of the positive impacts on the environment …………………………………... 94 3.6.1. Measures for the protection of air quality…………………………………………... 94 3.6.2. Measures for the reduction of impact on climate change…………………………... 95 3.6.3. Measures for the protection and sustainable utilization of water …………………... 95 3.6.4. Measures for protection and sustainable use of agricultural and forest land ……… 96 3.6.5. Measures to protect biodiversity, geodiversity and natural resources …………….. 97 3.6.6. Measures for the protection of landscape………………………………………....... 97 3.6.7. Measures of rational use of non-renewable and greater utilization of renewable 97 energy sources 98 3.6.8. Measures to improve the waste management system ……………………………… 3.6.9. Measures to protect and improve the health of the population ………………… 98 3.6.10. Measures for the protection of cultural heritage and preservation of historical and 98 archaeological sites …………………………………………………………………… 99 3.6.11. Disaster and emergency protection measures ………………….. 3 3.6.12. Environmental protection measures from cross-boundary impacts …………………. 4 4. GUIDELINES FOR MAKING IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AT LOWER HIERARCHY LEVELS НА ………………………………………………………………… 101 5. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM DURING THE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION……………………………………………………............................... 102 5.1. Description of the objectives of the Spatial Plan ……………………………………..... 102 5.2. Indicators for monitoring the state of the environment ………………......................... 103 5.3. Rights and obligations of competent authorities ………………………………………. 108 6. OVERVIEW OF THE METHODOLOGY USED IN MAKING THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ................................................................... 109 7. PRESENTATION OF THE DECISION-MAKING METHOD ……………………..... 111 8. CONCLUSIONS REACHED WHEN DRAFTING THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY) 113 ………………... 128 LIST OF GRAPHS…………………………………………………………………….. 129 LIST OF IMAGES………………………………………………………………………… 130 LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………………….. 5 1. BASIS OF THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT According to Article 13 of the Law on Strategic Environmental Assessment, the bases of the strategic assessment include the following: overview of the content and objectives of the plan and programme and their connection to other plans and programmes; overview of the current environmental status and quality in the area that the report refers to; environmental characteristics in areas likely to be exposed to significant impact; environmental protection issues and problems considered in the plan or programme and the outline of reasons for omission of certain issues and problems from the assessment procedure; outline and evaluation of the prepared alternative solutions related to environmental protection in the plan and programme, including the alternative solution of non-realization of the plan and programme and the most favourable alternative solutions from the aspect of environmental protection; results of previous consultations with interested authorities and organizations relevant from the aspect of objectives and evaluation of potential impact of the strategic assessment. The Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia (hereinafter: the Spatial Plan), for which the Strategic Environmental Assessment is being developed (hereinafter: the Strategic Assessment), is the basic planning document of spatial planning and development in the Republic of Serbia. The development of this Spatial Plan is based on two previous spatial plans (the first was adopted in 1996, and the second was adopted in 2010), implementation programmes and reports on the implementation of the 2010 Spatial Plan, “Serbia 2025” investment programme, strategies and development documents of the Republic of Serbia, results of previous research, requirements of competent public institutions and bodies, as well as international frameworks and documents in the area of spatial planning and development. The task of the development of the Spatial Plan is to provide national platform for spatial organization and structure that determines the manner in which the territory of the Republic of Serbia is used for the purpose of ensuring optimum and sustainable utilization of land. The Spatial Plan promotes the achievement of national/state objectives of spatial development despite various challenges, including depopulation, urbanization, regional inequalities, rural development, environmental degradation, technical infrastructure and insufficient or unproductive utilization of available territorial capital. Legal basis for the preparation of the Plan and Strategic Assessment The Spatial Plan was prepared in accordance with the Decision on the preparation of the Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia for the period from 2021 to 2035 (Official Gazette of RS, number 48/19). It was developed in accordance with the provisions of the Law on Planning and Construction (Official Gazette of RS, no. 72/09, 81/09 - corr., 64/10 – decision of the CC, 24/11, 121/12, 42/13 – decision of the CC, 50/13 – decision of the CC, 98/13 – decision of the CC, 132/14, 145/14, 83/18, 31/19 and 37/19 – other law) and the Rulebook on the content, manner and the procedure of preparation of documents of spatial and urban planning (Official Gazette of RS, number 32/19), as well as with other relevant laws, bylaws and regulations. Strategic Assessment is part of documentary basis of the Spatial Plan. It is prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Law on Environmental Protection (Official Gazette of RS, no.135/04,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNDP SRB PA.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: SITUATION ANALYSIS .................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Context, global significance, environmental, institutional and policy background ........ 4 1.2 Threats and root-causes ....................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Desired long-term vision and barriers to achieving it ....................................................... 7 1.4 Stakeholder analysis ............................................................................................................. 9 1.5 Baseline analysis .................................................................................................................. 10 PART II: STRATEGY ...................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Project Rationale and Conformity to GEF Policies and Strategic Objectives .............. 13 2.2 Country Ownership: Country Eligibility and Country Drivenness ............................... 13 2.3 Design principles and strategic considerations ................................................................ 14 2.4 Project Objective, Outcomes and Outputs/Activities ...................................................... 15 2.5 Financial modality .............................................................................................................. 22 2.6 Indicators, Risks and Assumptions ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Acrobat Pdfmaker
    6. Podaci o vrstama informacija PODACI O ŠUMAMA I OSTALIM DELATNOSTIMA PREDUZEĆA I- Zapremina posečenog drveta 1. Ukupno: 554.897 m³ 2. Oblo tehničko drvo: 323.232 m³ (58%) 3. Prostorno:231.665m³ (42%) II-RASADNIČKA PROIZVODNjA Površina rasadnika: 180,57 ha. Broj rasadnika: 16 Broj sadnica u proizvodnji: 900.000 Godišnja realizacija (utrošak za sadnju) sadnica: 600.000 Pošumljavanje (godišnje): 1.900,00 ha* *Napomena: Ovaj podatak se odnosi na pošumljavanje sadnjom sadnica, setvom semena i vegetativnu obnovu. III-ŠUMSKI PUTEVI Tvrdi šumski putevi: 241km.* *Napomena: Ovaj podatak ne sadrži javne i meke šumske puteve. Struktura površina JP "Vojvodinašume" A) Državne šume ha Red Period ŠUME I ŠUMSKO ZEMLjIŠTE OSTALO ZEMLjIŠTE UKUPNA . ŠUMSKO GAZDINSTVO važenja POVRŠINA Šumske Šumsko Za ostale broj POGŠ Svega Šuma Svega Neplodno kulture zemljište svrhe 1 Sremska Mitrovica 4249705 38740,06 29739,84 8369,71 630,51 3756,92 3671,30 85,69 2 Pančevo 50712,50 35461,32 20279,73 12841,42 2340,17 15251,1 6063,01 9188,17 3 Novi Sad 12842,24 11300,83 2605,51 7666,02 1029,30 1541,41 1277,62 263,79 4 Sombor 23795,38 18913,14 9883,18 7951,85 1078,11 4882,24 4376,59 514,65 SVEGA 129847,01 104415,35 62508,26 36829 5078,09 25431,7 15388,5 10052,3 B) Privatne šume ha Period ŠUME I ŠUMSKO ZEMLjIŠTE OSTALO ZEMLjIŠTE Red. UKUPNA ŠUMSKO GAZDINSTVO važenja broj POVRŠINA Šumske Šumsko Za ostale POGŠ Svega Šuma Svega Neplodno kulture zemljište svrhe 1 Sremska Mitrovica 3028,21 3028,21 2737,62 172,31 118,28 2 Pančevo 1829,96 1824,59 1530,78 293,81 5,37 5,37 3 Novi Sad 327,33 327,33 237,84 52,51 36,98 4 Sombor 187,38 187,38 138,23 49,15 SVEGA 5372,88 5367,51 4644,47 224,82 498,22 5,37 5,37 V) Ukupno: (Državne šume + Privatne šume) ha ŠUME I ŠUMSKO ZEMLjIŠTE OSTALO ZEMLjIŠTE Period Red.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Tourism for Rural Lovren, Vojislavka Šatrić and Jelena Development” (2010 – 2012) Beronja Provided Their Contributions Both in English and Serbian
    Environment and sustainable rural tourism in four regions of Serbia Southern Banat.Central Serbia.Lower Danube.Eastern Serbia - as they are and as they could be - November 2012, Belgrade, Serbia Impressum PUBLISHER: TRANSLATORS: Th e United Nations Environment Marko Stanojević, Jasna Berić and Jelena Programme (UNEP) and Young Pejić; Researchers of Serbia, under the auspices Prof. Branko Karadžić, Prof. Milica of the joint United Nations programme Jovanović Popović, Violeta Orlović “Sustainable Tourism for Rural Lovren, Vojislavka Šatrić and Jelena Development” (2010 – 2012) Beronja provided their contributions both in English and Serbian. EDITORS: Jelena Beronja, David Owen, PROOFREADING: Aleksandar Petrović, Tanja Petrović Charles Robertson, Clare Ann Zubac, Christine Prickett CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS: Prof. Branko Karadžić PhD, GRAPHIC PREPARATION, Prof. Milica Jovanović Popović PhD, LAYOUT and DESIGN: Ass. Prof. Vladimir Stojanović PhD, Olivera Petrović Ass. Prof. Dejan Đorđević PhD, Aleksandar Petrović MSc, COVER ILLUSTRATION: David Owen MSc, Manja Lekić Dušica Trnavac, Ivan Svetozarević MA, PRINTED BY: Jelena Beronja, AVANTGUARDE, Beograd Milka Gvozdenović, Sanja Filipović PhD, Date: November 2012. Tanja Petrović, Mesto: Belgrade, Serbia Violeta Orlović Lovren PhD, Vojislavka Šatrić. Th e designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy of the United Nations, nor does citing of trade names or commercial processes constitute endorsement. Acknowledgments Th is publication was developed under the auspices of the United Nations’ joint programme “Sustainable Tourism for Rural Development“, fi nanced by the Kingdom of Spain through the Millennium Development Goals Achievement Fund (MDGF).
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Jadar Lithium Mine,Serbia
    2021 Jadar Lithium Mine, Serbia A Raw Deal ICT metal mining case study Author Zvezdan Kalmar, CEKOR Editing Emily Gray Design Milan Trivic Cover SN040288, Depositphotos Acknowledgements Association Protect Jadar and Rađevina Center for Ecology and Sustainable Development (Centar za ekologiju i održivi razvoj – CEKOR) is an environmental and development organisation. Apart from monitoring international financial institutions’ activities in Serbia, CEKOR is working on issues in the areas of transport, waste, biodiversity, genetically modified organisms (GMO) and making the city of Subotica sustainable. CEKOR is a member of CEE Bankwatch Network. Coalition for Sustainable Mining, Serbia (Koalicija za održivo rudarstvo u Srbiji – KORS) is an organisation that promotes the application of the strictest social and environmental standards for mining and mineral use in Serbia. CEE Bankwatch Network is the largest network of grassroots, environmental and human rights groups in central and eastern Europe. It monitors public finance institutions that are responsible for hundreds of billions of investments across the globe. Together with local communities and other NGOs Bankwatch works to expose their influence and provide a counterbalance to their unchecked power. About ICT and the mining-related work of CEE Bankwatch Network CEE Bankwatch Network has been monitoring mining projects in Europe and abroad for years. Bankwatch cooperates with the Make ICT Fair consortium, which seeks to reform the information and communication technology (ICT) manufacture and minerals supply chains and to improve the lives of workers and those impacted along different stages of the ICT supply chain. Our long-term cooperation with groups monitoring the impact of mining on people and environment as well as with communities directly affected by mines or smelters strengthens our conviction that the many negative impacts of mining must finally come under the proper scrutiny.
    [Show full text]
  • Turizam I Hotelijerstvo
    UNIVERZITET U NOVOM SADU PRIRODNO-MATEMATIČKI FAKULTET DEPARTMAN ZA GEOGRAFIJU, TURIZAM I HOTELIJERSTVO Naučno-stručni časopis iz turizma TURIZAM br. 11 Savremene tendencije u turizmu, hotelijerstvu i gastronomiji 2007. YU ISSN 1450-6661 UNIVERZITET U NOVOM SADU PRIRODNO-MATEMATIČKI FAKULTET DEPARTMAN ZA GEOGRAFIJU, TURIZAM I HOTELIJERSTVO Naučno-stručni časopis iz turizma TURIZAM br.11 Savremene tendencije u turizmu, hotelijerstvu i gastronomiji 2007. Glavni i odgovorni urednik dr Miroslav Vesković, dekan Urednik dr Jovan Plavša Redakcija dr Jovan Romelić dr Lazar Lazić mr Tatjana Pivac mr Vuk Garača Igor Stamenković Vanja Dragičević Uglješa Stankov Departman za geografiju, Lektor i korektor turizam i hotlijerstvo Jasna Tatić Anadol Gegić Izdavač Prirodno-matematički fakultet Departman za geografiju, turizam i hotelijerstvo Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3 21000 Novi Sad tel + 381 (0)21 450 104, 450105 fax + 381 (0)21 459 696 Design & Prepress Lazarus, Kać Štampa Futura, Petrovaradin Tiraž 300 Štampanje časopisa pomogao Pokrajinski sekretarijat za nauku i tehnološki razvoj, Novi Sad. Održivi razvoj I turizam ..................67 Mr Tamara Kovačević SustainaBle Development Značaj Podunavačkih bara potencijalne Sadržaj and Tourism ...........................................67 turističke destinacije u regionalnom razvoju Zapadnog Pomoravlja ................... 131 Mr Vuk Garača Savremeni OBliCI U turizmu ..............5 Siniša S. Ratković Dr Nada I. Vidić Contemporary Forms in Tourism ..5 Sopotnički vodopadi u funkciji Turističke vrednosti muzejskih
    [Show full text]
  • ASF in Europe Under the GF-Tads Umbrella 16Th Meeting (SGE ASF16) November 2020 ASF Serbian Experience EARLY REACTION and CONTROL MEASURES in DOMESTIC PIGS
    Standing Group of Experts on ASF in Europe under the GF-TADs umbrella 16th meeting (SGE ASF16) November 2020 ASF Serbian experience EARLY REACTION AND CONTROL MEASURES IN DOMESTIC PIGS S E R B I A NUMBER OF MARKED AND REGISTERED PIGS IN RS 2019. Total Number of marked pigs Holding Small Medium Big farm farm comercial DISTRICT farm BEOGRAD 10,587 25,310 7,348 26,155 69,400 BORSKI 5,785 1,010 619 7,414 BRANIČEVSKI 6,293 10,445 4,630 51,409 72,777 JABLANIČKI 7,862 6,859 1,748 5,399 21,868 JUŽNO-BANATSKI 10,898 7,526 3,825 139,800 162,049 JUŽNO-BAČKI 7,917 34,670 35,542 284,113 362,242 KOLUBARSKI 12,410 37,092 11,277 1,714 62,493 MAČVANSKI 16,539 146,467 153,052 101,234 417,292 MORAVIČKI 4,381 5,914 5,935 568 16,798 NIŠAVSKI 5,391 7,192 1,982 1,498 16,063 PIROTSKI 4,635 1,562 111 1,073 7,381 PODUNAVSKI 5,258 13,692 12,101 49,577 80,628 POMORAVSKI 5,446 18,212 7,440 530 31,628 PČINJSKI 2,637 392 134 3,163 RASINSKI 12,801 53,974 7,756 4,956 79,487 RAŠKI 3,743 3,577 2,897 14,704 24,921 SEVERNO-BANATSKI 8,201 20,665 19,356 172,764 220,986 SEVERNO-BAČKI 2,891 35,074 58,912 230,311 327,188 SREDNJE-BANATSKI 16,568 24,889 11,348 54,161 106,966 SREMSKI 11,792 105,698 132,770 212,914 463,174 TOPLIČKI 1,082 1,224 115 23,172 25,593 ZAJEČARSKI 7,236 8,983 651 37,592 54,462 ZAPADNO-BAČKI 4,693 37,385 30,990 128,234 201,302 ZLATIBORSKI 4,550 1,282 552 6,384 ŠUMADIJSKI 13,135 14,941 4,079 15,285 47,440 Grand Total 192,731 624,035 515,170 1,557,163 2,889,099 Domestic pigs population • in 2019, a total of 74,985 pig holdings were registered in Serbia, of which: • 50,1251 kept up to 10 pigs, • 21, 741 kept 10 to 100 pigs, • medium commercial farms of 100 to 500 pigs- 2,721 • large commercial farms with more than 500 pigs- 398.
    [Show full text]
  • Degradation and Protection of Wetlands in Special Nature Reserves in Vojvodina
    Degradation and Protection of Wetlands in Special Nature Reserves in Vojvodina Degradation and Protection of Wetlands in Special Nature Reserves in Vojvodina Stojanović, Vladimir1 Introduction cal and technological accomplishments Wetlands, with their swamps, marshes leave an impression that man is independ- and water surfaces on peat land, natural ent of nature. However, natural disas- Abstract and artificial, steady and periodical, with ters, such as floods, storms, erosions, and In accordance with ecological, economic, stagnant or running water, are becoming droughts - suggest the opposite. The real- scientific and cultural importance of wet- an area of interest in the field of environ- ity is that the civilization is still quite de- lands and their ecosystems, in the last cou- mental protection. They have a key ecolog- pendant on nature and the ecosystems in ple of years there has been a much greater ical function as regulators of water regime the surrounding area. The historical de- interest in these areas and their adequate and as places of rich biodiversity. These ar- pendence of man and society in wetlands preservation. Moreover, that is because eas often unite significant economic, cul- is noticeable on the example of special na- wetlands are considered to be areas af- tural, scientific and recreational values of ture reserves in the valleys of the rivers in fected by various phenomena. As condi- their territory and that is why they have to Vojvodina. A medieval town of Bodrog, tions of natural-geographical environment be preserved. Human ecological faltering which is also mentioned as the centre of became favourable, numerous floodable and the loss of these kinds of ecosystems the whole region, was located on the terri- plains emerged in valleys of big rivers in can cause a serious damage to the environ- tory of special nature reserve “Gornje Po- Vojvodina, both in geological and the near ment (The Convention on Wetlands - bro- dunavlje”.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotel Prohor Pcinjski, Spa Bujanovac Media Center Bujanovac SPA Phone: +38164 5558581; +38161 6154768; [email protected]
    Telenet Hotels Network | Serbia Hotel Prohor Pcinjski, Spa Bujanovac Media Center Bujanovac SPA Phone: +38164 5558581; +38161 6154768; www.booking-hotels.biz [email protected] Hotel Prohor Pcinjski, Spa Bujanovac Hotel has 100 beds, 40 rooms in 2 single rooms, 22 double rooms, 5 rooms with three beds, and 11 apartments. Hotel has restaurant, aperitif bar, and parking. Restaurant has 160 seats. All rooms have telephone, TV, and SATV. Bujanovac SPA Serbia Bujanovacka spa is located at the southernmost part of Serbia, 2,5 km away from Bijanovac and 360 km away from Belgrade, at 400 m above sea level. Natural curative factors are thermal mineral waters, curative mud [peloid] and carbon dioxide. Medical page 1 / 9 Indications: rheumatic diseases, recuperation states after injuries and surgery, some cardiovascular diseases, peripheral blood vessel diseases. Medical treatment is provided in the Institute for specialized rehabilitation "Vrelo" in Bujanovacka Spa. The "Vrelo" institute has a diagnostic-therapeutic ward and a hospital ward within its premises. The diagnostic-therapeutic ward is equipped with the most modern means for diagnostics and treatment. Exceptional treatment results are achieved by combining the most modern medical methods with the curative effect of the natural factors - thermal mineral waters, curative mud and natural gas. In the vicinity of Bujanovacka Spa there is Prohorovo, an area with exceptional natural characteristics. In its centre there is the St. Prohor Pcinjski monastery, dating from the 11th century, with a housing complex that was restored for the purpose of tourist accommodation. The Prohorovo area encompasses the valley of the river Pcinja and Mounts Kozjak and Rujan, and is an area exceptionally pleasant for excursions and hunting.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Serbia Bieiii
    BIRD PROTECTION AND STUDY SOCIETY OF SERBIA PROVINCIAL SECRETARIAT FOR URBAN PLANNING, CONSTRUCTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SERBIA BIRDS POPULATION AND DISTRIBUTION CURRENT STATUS AND CHALLENGES Slobodan PUZOVI Ć & Milan RUŽI Ć Barcelona, March 2013 CORINE LAND COVER SERBIA 2006 - Monitorning of changes of land use, 1990, 2000. и 2006 - Corine Land Cover 2000 and 2006 database, in relation to Corine Land Cover 1990 database Forests in Serbia 2009 BIRDS IN SERBIA 2009 - c. 360 species - Forest in Serbia - 240 breeding species 2.252.400 ha (30,6%) - Forest ground over 35 % Nonpasseriformes: c.125 Passeriformes: c.115 Protected areas in Serbia 2010 - 5,9% of serbian territory - 465 protected natural areas FOREST HABITAT WATER HABITAT (105.131 hа; 1,4% of Serbia) (2.252.400 ha, 30,6% Србије ) 22) Reeds (c. 2.500 hа, Vojvodina) 1) Lowland aluvian forest (c. 36.000 ha) 23) Water steams (creek, river) (79.247 hа, 1% of Serbia)(beech, 2) Lowland ouk foret (c. 60.000 ha) sand, gravel 1.383 hа) 3) Hilly-mountain ouk forest (720.000 ha, 500-1300m) 24) Water bodies (stagnant water, lake, fish-pond, acumulation) 4) Hllly-mountain beech forest (500-2000m)(661.000 ha) (24.000 hа, 0,3% of Serbia) 5) Spruce foret (c. 50.000 ha, 700 мнв и више ) 25) Main canal network (ДТД sistem, 600 km in Vojvodina) 6) Pine foret (c. 35.000 ha) 26) Supporting canal network (20.100 km in Vojvodina) 7) Pine cvulture (86.000 ha) 8) Spruce culture (c. 35.000 ha, 600 мнв and more) 9) Mixed beech-fir-spruce forest (21.000 ha) AGRICULTURE LAND (5.036.000 ha, 63,7% Србије ) 10) Poplar plantation (37.000 ha) 27) Arable land I (arable land, farmland, large arable 11) ШИКАРЕ И ШИБЉАЦИ (510.000 ha) monoculture,...)(3.600.000 hа) 28) Arable land II (arable land, less parcels, edge bushes, rare ОPEN GLASSLAND HABITAT trees, canals, ...)(1.436.000 hа) 12) Mountain grassland and pasture (above 1000m) 13) Hilly grassland and pasture (400-1000m) URBAN-RURAL PLACES AND BUILDING LAND 14) Lowland pasture (35-400 м, 166.000 ha) (4.681 settlements in Serbia; c.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of the Copper Mining Activities in Majdanpek on Danube
    INFLUENCE OF THE COPPER MINING ACTIVITIES IN MAJDANPEK ON DANUBE RIVER Milan Trumić, Grozdanka Bogdanović, Maja Trumić, Bogdana Vujić, Zaklina Tasić, Ljubisa Andrić, Boban Spalović quality in significant cross-border nature reservations Djerdap / Iron Gate national park and Carska Bara special nature reserve, with population awareness raising works financed thru the Interreg IPA CBC Romania Serbia Programme 2014 - 2020 Project acronym: AEPS Project eMS code: RORS-462 Project webpage: http://aeps.upt.ro TIMISOARA, 2021 ISBN 978-973-0-33596-5 Contents Acknowledgment .................................................................................................................................... 2 1. National Park Đerdap ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.2. Description of the Pek river basin ........................................................................................... 6 1.3. Mali Pek river basin ................................................................................................................. 7 1.4. Veliki Pek river basin ............................................................................................................... 7 1.5. The Porečka River ................................................................................................................... 8 2. Pollutants
    [Show full text]
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912
    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
    [Show full text]