DOCSLIB.ORG

Bulletin Issue 20 Part? Read up More Here and Join Us at a Bootable USB Card and E-Mail July 2012 #Liberatedpixelcup on Irc.Gnu.Org — Forwarding

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bulletin Issue 20 Part? Read up More Here and Join Us at a Bootable USB Card and E-Mail July 2012 #Liberatedpixelcup on Irc.Gnu.Org — Forwarding guide, and we’d like to give away prizes for those who win the competition. You can help make this project all the How to Contribute more awesome with your donation! This competition also needs peo- Associate Membership: ple like you to enter and do awesome Become an associate member of things with it. Interested in taking the FSF. Members will receive Bulletin Issue 20 part? Read up more here and join us at a bootable USB card and e-mail July 2012 #liberatedpixelcup on irc.gnu.org — forwarding. To sign-up or get the admins and judges can be reached more information, visit member. E-books must increase for questions on the official forum as fsf.org or write to membership@ Contents well. fsf.org. our freedom, not Online: Use your credit card or E-books must increase 1 decrease it PayPal account to make a dona- our freedom, not tion at donate.fsf.org or con- decrease it by Richard Stallman tact [email protected] for more GNU Emacs Reference 3 FSF President information on supporting the Mugs and more I love The Jehovah Contract, and I’d FSF. Your money and your 4 like everyone else to love it too. I freedom have lent it out at least six times over Copyright c 2012 Jobs: List your job offers on our Update from the CTO 6 the years. Printed books let us do that. Free Software Foundation, Inc jobs page. See fsf.org/jobs for Around the world with 7 I couldn’t do that with most com- The articles in this bulletin are indi- details. RMS mercial e-books. It’s “not allowed.” And if I tried to disobey, the soft- vidually licensed under the Creative Free Software Directory: A hardware 7 endorsement hunch ware in e-readers has malicious fea- Commons Attribution No Deriva- Browse and download from thou- tures called Digital Restrictions Man- tive Works 3.0 United States Li- sands of different free software Volunteering on the Free 8 agement or DRM to restrict reading, cense. To view a copy of this license, projects! directory.fsf.org Software Directory visit http://creativecommons.org/ The right to repair 10 so it simply won’t work. The e-books licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/ or send a Volunteer: To learn more, visit Liberated Pixel Cup 11 are encrypted so only that malicious letter to Creative Commons, 171 Sec- fsf.org/volunteer. software can display them. ond Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, Many other habits that we readers Free Software Supporter California, 94105, USA. : are accustomed to are “not allowed” Make sure you’re getting all the for e-books. With the Amazon “Kin- Published twice yearly by the Free very latest news from the FSF at dle”, to take one example, users can’t Software Foundation, 51 Franklin fsf.org/fss. buy a book anonymously with cash. “Kindle” books are typically available Street, 5th Floor, Boston, MA 02110- LibrePlanet: Find local groups from Amazon only, and Amazon makes 1301 in your area or start your own at users identify themselves. Thus, Ama- (617)542-5942 libreplanet.org! [email protected] zon knows exactly which books each http://www.fsf.org/ user has read. In a country such as the UK, where you can be prosecuted for possessing a forbidden book, this is Order a GNU Emacs Reference Mug at shop.fsf.org more than hypothetically Orwellian. Furthermore, you can’t sell the e- book after you read it (if Amazon has its way, the used book stores where I 12 1 have passed many an afternoon will be books available only at the price of Motor Company, meanwhile, is back- history). You can’t give it to a friend freedom. I will not read any book at ing the OpenXC Platform which “runs either, because according to Amazon that price. Five years from now, will on a combination of the Arduino and you never really owned it. Amazon re- unauthorized copies be the only ethi- Android platforms,” meaning support quires users to sign an End User Li- cally acceptable copies for most books? not only for free software, but free cense Agreement which says so. It doesn’t have to be that way. hardware designs. Internationally, the You can’t even be sure it will still With anonymous payment on the In- 160+-member GENIVI Alliance is try- be in your machine tomorrow. Peo- ternet, paying for downloads of non- ing to get wide-spread adoption of ple reading 1984 in the “Kindle” had DRM non-EULA e-books would re- an In-Vehicle Infotainment (IVI) free an Orwellian experience: their e-books spect our freedom. Physical stores software development platform. Here vanished right before their eyes, as could sell such e-books for cash, like ‘infotainment’ (a somewhat outdated Amazon used a malicious software fea- digital music on CDs — still avail- term) refers to applications like driver- A screenshot from the Liberated Pixel ture called a “back door” to remotely able even though the music industry is drowsiness detection and instrument- Cup styleguide’s demo game delete them (virtual book-burning; is aggressively pushing DRM-restrictive cluster software as well as the more that what “Kindle” means?). But services such as Spotify. Physical traditional navigation and music pro- Liberated Pixel Cup don’t worry, Amazon promised never CD stores face the burden of an ex- grams. to do this again, except by order of the pensive inventory, but physical e-book Government regulatory bodies are by Matt Lee state. stores could write copies onto your growing interested in the safety im- Campaigns Manager With software, either the users con- USB memory stick, the only inventory plications of new vehicular software. iberated Pixel Cup is a two-part trol the program (making such soft- being memory sticks to sell if you need. Notably, the US National Highway Lcompetition: make a bunch of awe- ware Libre or Free) or the program The reason publishers give for their Transportation Safety Agency has some free culture licensed artwork, and controls its users (non-Libre). Ama- restrictive e-books practices is to stop advocated mandatory Event Data then program a bunch of free software 13 zon’s e-book policies imitate the distri- people from sharing copies. They say Recorders; that raise obvious pri- games that use it. bution policies of non-Libre software, this is for the sake of the authors; but vacy concerns; has proposed an in- Phase one of the competition is but that’s not the only relationship be- even if it did serve the authors’ inter- vehicle mobile-phone ban that would to build a set of artwork that’s dual tween the two. The malicious software ests (which for quite famous authors limit device use models; and consid- licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 and features described above are imposed it may), it could not justify DRM, ered mandatory backup cameras that GPLv3 and stylistically consistent. To on users via software that’s not Li- EULAs or the Digital Economy Act would show video within two seconds that end, we’re currently working on 14 bre. If a Libre program had malicious which persecutes readers for sharing. of power-on, which is a real challenge a style guide which incorporates these features like those, some users skilled In practice, the copyright system does for underlying operating systems. components. at programming would remove them, a bad job of supporting authors aside Both opportunity and peril for free Phase two of this competition will then provide the corrected version to from the most popular ones. Other au- software abound in the rapidly evolv- be building GPLv3 or later games that all the other users. Users can’t change thors’ principal interest is to be bet- ing automotive sector. By listening incorporate artwork from the artwork non-Libre software, which makes it an ter known, so sharing their work ben- carefully, with open minds, to the very building phase of the project. People ideal instrument for exercising power efits them as well as readers. Why not real safety and security concerns of can work in teams or individually. Par- over the public. switch to a system that does the job sympathetic parties within the indus- ticipants will be judged based on fun Any one of these encroachments on better and is compatible with sharing? try, advocates can engage new allies factor, innovativeness, and of course our freedom is reason aplenty to say no. A tax on memories and Internet and have a positive impact on the envi- how well they incorporate assets built If these policies were limited to Ama- connectivity, along the general lines of ronmentally and economically critical for the contest. Phase two runs from zon, we’d bypass them, but the other e- what most EU countries do, could do transportation sector. July 1st thru July 31st. book dealers’ policies are roughly sim- the job well if three points are got 13ur1.ca/9hxn9 Liberated Pixel Cup will be awe- ilar. right. The money should be collected 14ur1.ca/9hxnk some, but it can’t happen without the What worries me most is the by the state and distributed according help of people like you! prospect of losing the option of printed to law, not given to a private collect- We’re paying artists for comissions books. The Guardian has announced ing society; it should be divided among on the artwork for the initial style “digital-only reads”: in other words, all authors, and we mustnt let compa- 2 11 The right to repair The advent of issues like Right to Re- nies take any of it from them; and the pair presents free software with the op- distribution of money should be based by Alison Chaiken portunity to address the concerns of a on a sliding scale, not in linear pro- Help Eliminate DRM! she-devel.com new audience of stakeholders like auto portion to popularity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Walled Gardens of Ebook Surveillance: a Brief Set of Arguments Against DRM in Libraries
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research CUNY Graduate Center 2015 The Walled Gardens of Ebook Surveillance: A Brief Set of Arguments Against DRM in Libraries Alycia Sellie Graduate Center, CUNY How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_pubs/162 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Walled Gardens of Ebook Surveillance: A Brief Set of Arguments Against DRM in Libraries There are three claims I will make in this article about including electronic books with DRM restrictions in library collections. These arguments center upon what the presence of restricted ebooks signifies to patrons about libraries. The first argument outlines how providing books with DRM encourages library users to adopt low expectations for how their personal information will be shared and collected. Second, when users encounter DRM within library collections, not only are they frustrated by the ways that these systems restrict their use of a text, but they become more broadly disappointed in their library. Finally, I will show how the current technological landscape that allows third party surveillance via DRM threatens the professional standing of librarians as protectors of patron information. What is DRM? To me, DRM stands for Digital Restrictions Management. But choosing to call it such is a political choice.1 Others refer to DRM as Digital Rights Management. In a nutshell, DRM controls access to digital content and restricts the functionality a devices, such as an ebook reader or computer.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaromil's Research 2009
    Jaromil’s Research 2009 Jaromil’s Journal of Musings November 12, 2010 Almost every day I dedicate 2 good hours to research: nothing in particular, just looking around for inspirations, tools, publications and what not. Thanks go to the NIMk1 employing me in research and development. This diary is still in fieri: some links are scattered and still lacking comments, while it will grow complete over time, you might be also interested to read the research diary 20082. : Mon, 5 Jan 2009 John Maddog Hall: http://www.linux-magazine.com/online/blogs/paw_prints_writings_of_the_ maddog/campus_party_brazil_maddog_s_challenge_multimedia_and_free_software : Wed, 7 Jan 2009 uscito zeitgeist final ??? Not quite in the zone Fri, 9 Jan 2009 http://www.metamute.org/en/content/not_quite_in_the_zone Ben Watson http://www.militantesthetix. co.uk/ Politics in Israel Tue, 13 Jan 2009 Just before the elections in Israel and right after the massacre of civilians in Gaza, which also included bombing of UN headquarters and public incitations to murder peace activists3, it’s maybe time to have a look at how reasonable people are doing over there. One impressive campaign is December 18th4: at the motto of FREE THE SHMINISTIM“ young conscious objectors (among them also the daughter of a former deputy head of Mossad) stepped forward and refused to serve the omnipresent militarization of Israel, the country where they are born and that still forces them to serve IDF for 2 to 3 years. Since 20 years now (and finally) we had abolition of coercive military service for youth in Europe: this is definitely one of the most important political standpoints for Israel to work on, if it intends to get closer to Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Software
    Open Source Software Agenda ● Definitions of different “types” of software ● Key characteristics of each type ● Key points of difference ● Cost of free/open source software ● Historical overview ● Licenses ● Examples of free/open source alternatives in a few domains Agenda (cont.) ● Extensions of the “open source” philosophy to other domains ● The anti-open-source brigade ● Reasons for using OSS Open source software ● Software whose source code can be viewed, modified and re-distributed in its modified form after it meets certain licensing restrictions, e.g., – indicating the authorship of various components – requiring that the modified version of the product also be open-sourced Free software ● As defined by Richard Stallman, affords the following freedoms to its users: – Freedom 0: The freedom to run the program for any purpose. – Freedom 1: The freedom to study how the program works, and change it to make it do what you wish. – Freedom 2: The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor. – Freedom 3: The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements (and modified versions in general) to the public, so that the whole community benefits. Source: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html Differences between open source and free software ● “The term 'open source' software is used by some people to mean more or less the same category as free software. It is not exactly the same class of software: they accept some licenses that we consider too restrictive, and there are free software licenses they have not
    [Show full text]
  • Free Software Foundation, Inc
    Comment Regarding a Proposed Exemption Under 17 U.S.C. 1201 Item 1. Commenter Information Donald Robertson, III Free Software Foundation, Inc. 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor Boston, MA 02110-1335 [email protected] This comment is filed by the Free Software Foundation, a charitable corporation founded in 1985. The Foundation is the largest single contributor to the GNU operating system (used widely today in its GNU/Linux variant). The Foundation's GNU General Public License is the most widely used free software license, covering major components of the GNU operating system and tens of thousands of other computer programs used on hundreds of millions of computers around the world. Item 2. Proposed Class Addressed Class 7: 7(a) Motion Pictures—Text and Data Mining 7(b) Literary Works—Text and Data Mining Item 3. Statement Regarding Proposed Exemption The GNU/Linux operating system has become one of the most widely used operating systems on the planet. The GNU System and the kernel Linux are called free software because users are free to study, share, and improve the software. Those who promote free software believe that controlling one’s own computing should be a universal right. Digital restrictions interfere with the ability to enjoy these freedoms. Circumventing such restrictions for any use should not come with the threat of legal sanction. The process of continually applying for exemptions under 17 U.S.C. 1201 is onerous and instead any circumvention for a non-infringing purpose should be permitted. However, where exemptions are used to safeguard the public from these laws, it must be the case that exemptions should cover the sharing and distribution of software and instructions for circumventing access control technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethical Visions of Copyright Law
    GRIMMELMANN FINAL 3/30/2009 10:08:14 PM View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Commons @ UM Law THE ETHICAL VISIONS OF COPYRIGHT LAW James Grimmelmann* INTRODUCTION All of intellectual property law is an act of imagination. If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to call it “property,” the tree still exists. But the objects of intellectual property have no existence apart from what we give them. You can’t copyright an unwritten novel; you have no trademark rights in a word the consuming public has never heard of. We must imagine these things into being before we can make them the subject of legal rights and obligations. Nor is the work of imagination done at the moment of creation. We must constantly play a game of practical metaphysics to grant legal rights over things that can’t be seen or touched. When the legal system says that this assembly of gears and levers infringes on that set of marks on a piece of paper, it’s calling an abstraction into being. The “invention” that connects the two is itself a creation of the legal mind no less than the arrangement of parts is a creation of the engineering mind. Lawyers must decide whether a given abstraction is an invention at all (most of us would agree that a short story isn’t one); whether it has attributes like “new,” “useful,” “obvious,” and so on; and what exactly its limits are. None of these distinctions come ready-made in nature; they require continuous, purposeful, collective imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex I Definitions
    Annex I Definitions Free and Open Source Software (FOSS): Software whose source code is published and made available to the public, enabling anyone to copy, modify and redistribute the source code without paying royalties or fees. Open source code evolves through community cooperation. These communities are composed of individual programmers and users as well as very large companies. Some examples of open source initiatives are GNU/Linux, Eclipse, Apache, Mozilla, and various projects hosted on SourceForge1 and Savannah2 Web sites. Proprietary software -- Software that is distributed under commercial licence agreements, usually for a fee. The main difference between the proprietary software licence and the open source licence is that the recipient does not normally receive the right to copy, modify, redistribute the software without fees or royalty obligations. Something proprietary is something exclusively owned by someone, often with connotations that it is exclusive and cannot be used by other parties without negotiations. It may specifically mean that the item is covered by one or more patents, as in proprietary technology. Proprietary software means that some individual or company holds the exclusive copyrights on a piece of software, at the same time denying others access to the software’s source code and the right to copy, modify and study the software. Open standards -- Software interfaces, protocols, or electronic formats that are openly documented and have been accepted in the industry through either formal or de facto processes, which are freely available for adoption by the industry. The open source community has been a leader in promoting and adopting open standards. Some of the success of open source software is due to the availability of worldwide standards for exchanging information, standards that have been implemented in browsers, email systems, file sharing applications and many other tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin Issue 25
    Issue 25 Bulletin November 2014 Contents Free software needs your vote Free software needs your 1 by John Sullivan vote Executive Director What would a free 3 t the Free Software Foundation, software world look like? Awe want to empower all computer GNU Guix and GNU’s 4 users everywhere to do everything they 31st Birthday might need or want to do on any com- Appropriate legal 5 puter, using only free software, with- notices out having to ask permission. Free tools for the FSF 6 By definition, proprietary software Common misconceptions 7 does not empower users in this way. in licensing It places limits on what they can do, Volunteer opportunities 9 such as preventing sharing of the soft- at the FSF ware, or looking at its code to see how See you at LibrePlanet 10 it works. 2015! Proprietary software enables users Around the world in (a 11 to pursue everything they might need hundred and) eighty or want to do, only as long as the soft- days ware distributor approves. The four freedoms that define free software — to run the program (0), to study and modify it (1), to share it (2), and to share modifications (3) — are meant for everyone, in their inter- actions with any program. Free soft- ware is a means to protect the individ- ual freedom of computer users. But why would someone who has Register for LibrePlanet at u.fsf.org/14w. no intention of ever reading the source code of programs running on their computer, much less in modifying it, care about Freedom 1, or Freedom 3? Why do they need or want the freedom to do things they might never need or want to do? 1 One reason is that any computer general, the right to vote can be a pow- user can ask someone else to do those erful check on government behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Visión General Del Sistema GNU
    Traducciones de esta página Historia Filosofía Licencias Descargas Ayude a GNU ¡Únase a la FSF! Why GNU/Linux? Buscar Visión general del sistema GNU The GNU operating system is a complete free software system, upward­compatible with Unix. GNU stands for “GNU's Not Unix”. Richard Stallman made the Initial Announcement of the GNU Project in September 1983. A longer version called the GNU Manifesto was published in March 1985. It has been translated into several other languages. The name “GNU” was chosen because it met a few requirements; first, it was a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not Unix”, second, because it was a real word, and third, it was fun to say (or Sing). La palabra «libre» se refiere a libertad, no a precio [N. del T.: en inglés se usa la misma palabra para libre y gratuito]. Puedes o no pagar un precio por obtener software de GNU. De cualquier manera, una vez que obtienes el software, tienes tres libertades específicas para usarlo. La primera, la libertad de copiar el programa y darlo a tus amigos o compañeros de trabajo. La segunda la libertad de cambiar el programa como desees, por tener acceso completo al código fuente. La tercera, la libertad de distribuir una versión mejorada ayudando así a construir la comunidad (si redistribuye software de GNU, puede cobrar una tarifa por el acto físico de efectuar la copia, o bien puede regalar copias.). El proyecto para desarrollar el sistema GNU se denomina «Proyecto GNU». El Proyecto GNU se concibió en 1983 como una forma de devolver el espíritu cooperativo que prevalecía en la comunidad computacional en sus primeros días; hacer la cooperación posible al eliminar los obstáculos impuestos por los dueños de software privativo.
    [Show full text]
  • When You're Windows Are Broken Don't Be Surprised If You Feel The
    ecolonomics Paul Mobbs' newsletter of thoughts, ideas and observations on energy, economics and human ecology http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/ecolonomics/ [email protected] When You're Windows are Broken don't be Surprised if you Feel the Cold Draught of Distress The phone rings; against the background noise of a call centre a young man says, “I am phoning about your Windows computer”. I reply casually, “I don't have a Windoze com- puter” (I always make an effort to nasally sound the 'z' consonant). He apologises and rings off. Later his simple statement begins to bother me; why would anyone assume an automatic connection between the concepts “Windows” and “computer” when clearly Windoze is one of the worst operating systems that you can load onto a computer in order to use it creatively? Banbury, Thursday 23rd December 2010. I'm sitting in my office below the skylight. This I don't want to be here. There are so many oth- pretty much typifies my existence for the last few er more interesting things I could be doing months. However, whilst usually I'm labouring here today; as I sit looking through my window on the on behalf of someone else today I'm labouring here snowy-white world I'd certainly rather be out- for myself. It's nearly Christmas and, as usual (it's side. I'm here for one simple reason – it's neces- the quiet point in the year), I'm conducting my annu- sary. Whether I like it or not, I need computers to al systems back-up, re-stall and reload pantomime.
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Guide to Using Free Software in the Public Sector
    A Practical Guide to Using Free Software in the Public Sector ***** (with references to the French copyright law, when applicable) Version 1.31 June 2010 This document is distributed under a Creative Commons "Attribution + ShareAlike" licence. Author: Thierry Aimé (DGI – Ministry for the Budget, Public Accounts and the Civil Service) With the participation of: Philippe Aigrain (Sopinspace), Jean-François Boutier (Ministry for Ecology, Sustainable Development and Spatial Planning), Frédéric Couchet (April), Elise Debies (DGME – Ministry for the Budget, Public Accounts and the Civil Service), François Elie (ADULLACT), Jean-Paul Degorce-Duma (DGSIC – Ministry of Defence), Esther Lanaspa (DGME – Ministry for the Budget, Public Accounts and the Civil Service), Sylvie Poussines (DAJ – Ministry for the Economy, Finance and Employment), Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz (OSOR.eu). A practical guide to using free software in the public sector 2 Contents 1 -What is software?.............................................................................................................................3 2 -Legal regimes governing the use of software..................................................................................3 3 -Who holds the copyright to software?.............................................................................................4 4 -What is a software licence?..............................................................................................................4 5 -What is a free software licence?.......................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • The Intel Management Engine: an Attack on Computer Users' Freedom by Denis Gnutoo Carikli
    A statement by FSF President Richard Stallman on the Intel Management Engine (ME): "Meltdown and Spectre are errors. Grave errors, to be sure, but not evidently malicious. Everyone makes mistakes. Intel has done far worse with its CPUs than make a mistake. It has built in an intentional back door called the Management Engine. Important as these bugs are, don©t let Intel©s mistakes distract you from Intel©s deliberate attack!" The Intel Management Engine: an attack on computer users© freedom By Denis GNUtoo Carikli With security issues like the Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities (https://www.cnet.com/news/meltdown-spectre-intel-ceo-no-recall-chip-processor/) discovered in Intel chips in early 2018, it became more important than ever to talk about the necessity of software freedom in these deeply embedded technologies. Serious as though these bugs may be, we cannot let them distract us from the broader issues: Intel considers the Intel Management Engine a feature, while it©s nothing more than a threat to user freedom. Thanks to Denis GNUtoo Carikli, we have a new basis for that conversation in this article. The Intel Management Engine is a tool that ships with Intel chipsets, purportedly to ease the job of system administrators. But in reality, it is another restriction on user freedoms, imposed by a company, and used to control your computing. Carikli offers a moderately technical explanation of what©s happening with Management Engine, the ways in which it restricts rather than empowers users, and how it violates the four freedoms of free software. Carikli may be best known for his work on the Replicant project (https://www.replicant.us/), which he co-founded with Aaron Williamson, Bradley Kuhn, and Grazlano Sorbaioli.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF File (244K Characters)
    Information For Maintainers of GNU Software Richard Stallman last updated September 26, 2006 Information for maintainers of GNU software, last updated September 26, 2006. Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this entire document without royalty provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are preserved. i Table of Contents 1 About This Document ......................... 1 2 Stepping Down.................................. 1 3 Recruiting Developers .......................... 2 4 Legal Matters ................................... 2 4.1 Copyright Papers .............................................. 2 4.2 Legally Significant Changes .................................... 4 4.3 Recording Contributors ........................................ 5 4.4 Copyright Notices .............................................. 6 4.5 License Notices................................................. 7 4.6 External Libraries .............................................. 9 5 Cleaning Up Changes .......................... 9 6 Platforms to Support ......................... 10 7 Dealing With Mail ............................ 11 8 Recording Old Versions ....................... 12 9 Distributions ................................... 12 9.1 Distribution tar Files.......................................... 12 9.2 Distribution Patches .......................................... 13 9.3 Distribution on ftp.gnu.org.................................
    [Show full text]