Daylight Saving for South East Queensland Referendum Bill 2010 (Qld)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Daylight Saving for South East Queensland Referendum Bill 2010 (Qld) Queensland Parliamentary Library Daylight Saving in Queensland: Daylight Saving for South East Queensland Referendum Bill 2010 (Qld) The Daylight Saving for South East Queensland Referendum Bill 2010 (Qld), a Private Member’s bill, proposes to introduce daylight saving in part of south east Queensland if a majority of electors in Queensland approve of it at a referendum. The proposed introduction of daylight saving in south east Queensland is an issue that generates much discussion. A recent Queensland Government survey found that while approximately two thirds of the south east Queensland respondents were in favour of holding a referendum on daylight saving for south east Queensland, approximately two thirds of the respondents from outside the south east were opposed to the idea. This Research Brief looks at the issue of daylight saving, particularly in relation to Queensland. After providing background on the setting of standard time in Australia and how daylight saving came to be adopted in numerous jurisdictions, the paper summarises the history of daylight saving in Queensland. Mary Westcott Research Brief No 2010/22 Queensland Parliamentary Library General Distribution Research Team Research and Information Service Ms Karen Sampford, Team Leader (07) 3406 7116 Mrs Nicolee Dixon, Senior Parliamentary Research Officer (07) 3406 7409 Mrs Renee Gastaldon, Parliamentary Research Officer (07) 3406 7241 Ms Mary Westcott, Parliamentary Research Officer (07) 3406 7372 Ms Kelli Longworth, Parliamentary Research Officer (07) 3406 7468 Research Publications are compiled for Members of the Queensland Parliament, for use in parliamentary debates and for related parliamentary purposes. Information in publications is current to the date of publication. Information on legislation, case law or legal policy issues does not constitute legal advice. Research Publications on Bills reflect the legislation as introduced and should not be considered complete guides to the legislation. To determine whether a Bill has been enacted, or whether amendments have been made to a Bill during consideration in detail, the Queensland Legislation Annotations, prepared by the Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel, or the Bills Update, produced by the Table Office of the Queensland Parliament, should be consulted. Readers should also refer to the relevant Alert Digest of the Scrutiny of Legislation Committee of the Queensland Parliament at: www.parliament.qld.gov.au/SLC © Queensland Parliamentary Library, 2010 ISSN 1443-7902 ISBN 978-1-921056-87-1 JULY 2010 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited, other than by Members of the Queensland Parliament in the course of their official duties, without the prior written permission of the Clerk of the Parliament on behalf of the Parliament of Queensland. Inquiries should be addressed to: Team Leader, General Distribution Research Team Research and Information Service Queensland Parliamentary Library Parliament House George Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 Ms Karen Sampford. (Tel: 07 3406 7116) Email: [email protected] Information about Research Publications can be found on the Internet at: www.parliament.qld.gov.au/publications CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................1 2 STANDARD TIME...........................................................................................1 2.1 DIFFERENT TIME ZONES ................................................................................3 3 DAYLIGHT SAVING.......................................................................................4 3.1 BRIEF HISTORY OF DAYLIGHT SAVING ..........................................................5 3.1.1 World War I ...........................................................................................6 3.1.2 World War II..........................................................................................7 3.1.3 Post-World War II..................................................................................8 4 DAYLIGHT SAVING IN AUSTRALIA.........................................................8 4.1 TASMANIA .....................................................................................................8 4.2 NEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY, VICTORIA AND SOUTH AUSTRALIA................................................................................9 4.3 NORTHERN TERRITORY ...............................................................................10 4.4 WESTERN AUSTRALIA .................................................................................10 4.5 QUEENSLAND ..............................................................................................11 5 QUEENSLAND...............................................................................................11 5.1 QUEENSLAND’S GEOGRAPHY ......................................................................11 5.1.1 Latitude and Longitude ........................................................................11 5.1.2 Temperatures in Queensland................................................................12 5.2 WAR TIME DAYLIGHT SAVING ....................................................................13 5.3 ISLAND TIME................................................................................................13 5.4 1971-1972 TRIAL OF DAYLIGHT SAVING AND 1973 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON DAYLIGHT SAVING ............................................................13 5.5 1989-1990 TRIAL OF DAYLIGHT SAVING.....................................................15 5.5.1 Daylight Saving Task Force ................................................................16 5.6 SUMMER TIME ACT 1990 (QLD)..................................................................19 5.7 1992 REFERENDUM .....................................................................................19 5.8 PETITIONS....................................................................................................20 5.9 2007 SURVEY ON ATTITUDES TOWARDS DAYLIGHT SAVING ......................21 5.9.1 General Support for Daylight Saving ..................................................21 5.9.2 Two Time Zones..................................................................................21 5.9.3 No Daylight Saving .............................................................................22 5.9.4 Queensland Government Response to the Survey Results ..................22 6 DAYLIGHT SAVING FOR SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND REFERENDUM BILL 2010..........................................................................22 6.1 COMPONENTS OF THE BILL ..........................................................................23 6.1.1 The Referendum Question...................................................................23 6.1.2 Amendments to the Standard Time Act 1894 (Qld)............................24 6.2 GOVERNMENT COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE BILL .....................................25 7 REACTION TO THE BILL ..........................................................................26 7.1 QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT.......................................................................26 7.2 LNP ............................................................................................................28 7.3 DAYLIGHT SAVING FOR SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND PARTY ........................28 7.4 BUSINESS ....................................................................................................29 7.5 NORTH QUEENSLAND..................................................................................29 7.6 PETER WELLINGTON MP.............................................................................30 8 CONCLUSION ...............................................................................................30 APPENDIX.............................................................................................................33 RECENT QPL RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS 2010........................................35 Daylight Saving for South East Queensland Referendum Bill EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Research Brief looks at the issue of daylight saving, particularly in relation to Queensland. As explained in Parts 2 and 3 of this Research Brief, daylight saving involves a modification of the time so as to provide more daylight in the evening and less in the early morning. During the two World Wars, Australia and a number of other countries instituted daylight saving to reduce the need for artificial lighting and thus save fuel. It was not used again in Australia until 1967 when a severe drought limited Tasmania’s energy supplies and it was considered that daylight saving would reduce the demand for power. In the summer of 1971-1972, a number of places in Australia, including Queensland, trialled daylight saving. South Australia and the eastern states, apart from Queensland, adopted it permanently following the trial. Parts 5 and 6 of this Research Brief provide a chronological history of daylight saving in Queensland from its use during the war years through to the reaction provoked by the Daylight Saving for South East Queensland Referendum Bill 2010 (Qld). The Daylight Saving for South East Queensland Referendum Bill 2010 (Qld) was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 14 April 2010 by the Independent Member for
Recommended publications
  • Transcript 9 October 2012 Estimates
    09 Oct 2012 Estimates—Premier and Cabinet 1 TUESDAY, 9 OCTOBER 2012 Legislative Assembly ESTIMATES—FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE—PREMIER AND CABINET Estimates Committee Members Estimates—Premier and Cabinet Mr MJ Crandon (Chair) Mr CW Pitt Mr R Gulley Mr IS Kaye Mr TS Mulherin Mrs FK Ostapovitch Mr EJ Sorensen Mr MA Stewart In Attendance Hon. CKT Newman, Premier Mr B Myers, Chief of Staff, Office of the Premier Department of the Premier and Cabinet Mr J Grayson, Director-General Mr G Robson, Director, Economic Policy Ms J Dudurovic, Executive Director, Business Services Mr I Maynard, Commission Chief Executive, Public Service Commission Committee met at 10.32 am CHAIR: I declare the estimates hearing of the Finance and Administration Committee open. On behalf of the committee, I welcome to the hearing the Premier, officers of the department and related entities, and members of the public. I am Michael Crandon, the member for Coomera and chair of the committee. Joining me on the committee are Mr Curtis Pitt, who is yet to arrive; Mr Reg Gulley MP, member for Murrumba; Mr Ian Kaye MP, member for Greenslopes; Mr Tim Mulherin MP, member for Mackay; Mrs Freya Ostapovitch MP, member for Stretton; Mr Ted Sorensen MP, member for Hervey Bay; Mr Mark Stewart MP, member for Sunnybank; and Annastacia Palaszczuk MP, member for Inala. The committee will now examine the Appropriation Bill 2012 and the estimates for the areas of responsibility administered by the Premier. The committee will consider the estimates for the Department of the Premier and Cabinet and related entities until 12 noon.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard 16 May 1996
    Legislative Assembly 1169 16 May 1996 THURSDAY, 16 MAY 1996 Ambulance Service, Ipswich From Mr Veivers (858 signatories) requesting the House to provide the Ipswich area with a direct telephone number for the Mr SPEAKER (Hon. N. J. Turner, Nicklin) Ambulance Service within the Ipswich area. read prayers and took the chair at 9.30 a.m. Gun Control Laws PRIVILEGE From Mr Barton (185 signatories) Alleged Misleading of House by requesting the House to legislate against the Minister for Public Works and Housing ownership and possession of automatic and semi-automatic weapons. Hon. T. M. MACKENROTH (Chatsworth) (9.31 a.m.): I rise on a matter of Petitions received. privilege. Mr Speaker, yesterday in the Parliament I raised the issue of the Minister for Public Works and Housing misleading the MUNDINGBURRA ELECTION 1996 House, which I asked you to consider. I ask: Statistical Returns have you considered that matter? Hon. D. E. BEANLAND Mr SPEAKER: I am further considering (Indooroopilly—Attorney-General and Minister the matter that the member has raised. I for Justice) (9.40 a.m.): In accordance with intend to report to the Parliament when I have section 19(3) of the Electoral Act 1992, I am fully considered the member's request. pleased to present for the information of honourable members the statistical returns Mr MACKENROTH: As the Parliament from the new Mundingburra election held on 3 will not be meeting until July, I therefore February 1996. I am advised by the Electoral move— Commissioner that this is the most "That the matter referred to by the comprehensive report ever compiled for a member for Chatsworth in the Parliament local, State or Federal election in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
    15 . The implosion of Joh Bjelke- Petersen, 1983–1987 The 1983 election ended the ‘constitutional crisis’ by providing the Nationals with exactly half the seats in the Parliament (41) and the opportunity to supplement their ministry with Liberal ministerialists who would agree to join the new government. The Premier had a number of options to secure his majority. Many of the surviving former Liberal ministers were not generally regarded as ‘anti-coalitionists’ in the previous government. The six potential ministerialists who might have been persuaded to change allegiances were: Norm Lee, Bill Lickiss, Brian Austin, Don Lane, Colin Miller and even Bill Knox. According to the Courier-Mail (15 July 1983), when two Coalition backbenchers, Bill Kaus and Bob Moore, had quit the Liberals and joined the Nationals in July, two Liberal ministers, Norm Lee and Bill Lickiss, already had indicated they would consider jumping ship. It was almost as if a race to defect was on. The two other Liberals to survive the 1983 poll, Terry White and Angus Innes, would not have been acceptable to the Premier and his senior ministers. In total, six of the eight Liberals had been ministers (although Miller had served for just 13 days after White was sacked and before the resignations of all the Liberals were accepted). Knox had been a minister since 1965 and Lee and Lickiss had been ministers since early 1975. They had some pedigree. Austin and Lane (and White) each had one parliamentary term as minister. Two Liberals, however, took the issue into their own hands. The day after the election, Austin and Lane had discussed the prospects of defecting and swapping parties, with Austin saying ‘I’m sick of this…I reckon we ought to give ’em the arse.
    [Show full text]
  • Desley Boyle
    Speech by DESLEY BOYLE MEMBER FOR CAIRNS Hansard 4 August 1998 FIRST SPEECH Ms BOYLE (Cairns—ALP) (3.07 p.m.): I am pleased, proud and, most of all, privileged to speak for the first time in this House as the member for Cairns. I extend my congratulations to all honourable members of this House on their election and re-election. Through you, Mr Deputy Speaker, I extend my congratulations to Mr Speaker on his election to that high office and my unequivocal support in assisting him to carry out the responsibilities of upholding the finest principles of our social democratic traditions. Though over a month has passed since the election, I find that I am still frequently filled with amazement at my good fortune in having reached a position of such importance and privilege as that of the member for Cairns. It is appropriate at this time to recall the proud history of the Labor Party in the seat of Cairns. It has been held by the Labor Party since 1904, with the exception of several years during the 1940s when it was held by a Labor Independent. It was therefore, with cause, a significant celebration for the party in Cairns that I, as the Labor candidate, was elected on 13 June to continue this extraordinary mandate. I am conscious of the high quality of representation given Cairns by my immediate predecessors. Ray Jones served from 1965 to 1983. Truly a man of the people and a gentleman, he worked tirelessly over all those years, despite the then even greater exigencies arising through the distance of Cairns from the seat of Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard 27 October 1994
    Legislative Assembly 10007 27 October 1994 THURSDAY, 27 OCTOBER 1994 sell us something just as we have sat down to have our evening meal. Quite often, the direct marketeer has used a list that has our personal details on it, yet most of us have no idea that our Mr SPEAKER (Hon. J. Fouras, Ashgrove) details are on that list. read prayers and took the chair at 10 a.m. Many people would be appalled to learn that if they subscribe to a magazine, enter a competition in their local newspaper or join a PETITIONS club, their details could end up on a list without The Clerk announced the receipt of the their knowledge and that the list could be freely following petitions— rented or sold to direct marketeers. Some of the consumer lists freely available in Australia include consumers by ethnic origin, elderly people, adult Penalties and Sentences video buyers, slimming magazine subscribers, From Mr Beanland (2 493 signatories) and conservative political activists. praying that the Parliament of Queensland will Some ridiculous examples of lists available take action to ensure (a) that there be in the United States for sale or rental include punishment, not reward, for perpetrators of women 35 to 44 years with teenagers, a cat and violent crimes; and (b) that there be truth in an interest in astrology; Seventh Day Adventists sentencing with no parole. with more than one telephone; clergy in affluent postcodes; and Scotch drinkers who have Fishing and Recreation, National Parks purchased sensual clothing. From Mr Stoneman (393 signatories) Mr W. K.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard 21 MAY 1993
    Legislative Assembly 21 May 1993 3295 FRIDAY, 21 MAY 1993 Mr SPEAKER (Hon. J. Fouras, Ashgrove) read prayers and took the chair at 10 a.m. PETITIONS The Clerk announced the receipt of the following petitions— Queensland University of Technology Campus, Sunshine Coast From Miss Simpson (273 signatories) praying that the proposed new campus of the university on the Sunshine Coast be situated at Sippy Downs at Tanawha. Dryander National Park From Mr Robertson (20 signatories) praying that the Parliament of Queensland will reject any motion to revoke the dedication of the area of Dryander National Park adjacent to the eastern arm of Double Bay. Brisbane Casino From Mr Beattie (23 signatories) praying that the proposed Brisbane Casino be not proceeded with. Police Staffing, Burleigh Electorate From Mrs Gamin (4 691 signatories) praying for action to be taken to boost police numbers in the Burleigh electorate. Petitions received. STATUTORY INSTRUMENT In accordance with the schedule circulated by the Clerk to members in the Chamber, the following document was tabled— Queensland University of Technology Act— Proclamation—14 May 1993 as the date on which the members of the Queensland University of Technology Council appointed by the Council on 3 March 1993 under section 8 (2) of the Act, assume office. PAPERS The following papers were laid upon the table of the House— Minister for Environment and Heritage (Ms Robson)— (1) A proposal by the Governor in Council to revoke the setting apart and declaration as National Park under the National Parks
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study Evaluating James' Public Relations Positioning
    Power, legitimacy and political positioning: a case study evaluating James’ Public Relations Positioning Framework A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to The School of Creative Industries University of Newcastle, Australia. by Deborah Jane Wise B. Communication (Hons) (UoN) 21 July 2017 Declaration This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my Knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Signed: _________________________ Date: Name: Deborah Jane Wise ii Acknowledgements I wish to firstly acKnowledge the unfailing guidance and support provided by my primary supervisor, Dr Melanie James, from the University of Newcastle. Words cannot adequately express how much I appreciate everything she has done in the course of the supervision of this thesis, including providing me with invaluable guidance and insightful feedbacK at every stage of my ‘way finding’ PhD journey. I thank her for her kindness, friendship, and her indefatigable support and encouragement to pursue this research. I would also liKe to thank my co-supervisor Professor Judy Motion from the University of New South Wales. I have always had the utmost regard and admiration for her scholarship. Given she is held is such high esteem in our field, it was with some trepidation that I approached Dr James about whether we could invite Profession Motion to be involved with my thesis supervision.
    [Show full text]
  • 'A Tale of Two Parties: Contrasting Performances of Annastacia
    ‘A tale of two parties: Contrasting performances of Annastacia Palaszczuk’s Labor and the post-Newman LNP in Queensland’ Chris Salisbury [email protected] Abstract Queensland’s 2017 state election resulted in Annastacia Palaszczuk’s Labor gov- ernment being returned with a slim majority. While not a resounding victory, the result seemingly vindicated the premier’s decision to head to an early election, and reinforced her standing in a succession of opinion polls as ‘preferred pre- mier’ for most voters. The result also halted the short sequence of Queensland governments being voted out of office in no uncertain terms by a suppos- edly volatile electorate. The extent to which Labor’s recent electoral success in Queensland — and the quelling of that volatility — can be attributed to Palaszczuk’s leadership is still open to debate. It is instructive, though, to note the differences in leadership and campaigning styles between Palaszczuk and her opponents, which saw her drag a decimated Labor Party back to office after a single term in opposition, then saw it returned with a working parliamentary majority. This article highlights those differences over the last term of gov- ernment, contrasting the performance of the two major parties in Queensland in terms of their leadership and election campaign approaches. The analysis helps to explain some of the reasons for the respective parties’ recent electoral showings. Introduction After Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk called an early state election for 25 November 2017, pundits in Queensland suggested that the result would be close and difficult to predict.1 This was partly due to several novel factors in play at the election, among them redrawn electoral boundaries, the addition of four new seats and the reintroduction of compulsory preferential voting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Queensland Shelter. Maree Janine Stanley BA, Cert. Ed
    From Pressure to Participation: The Role of Queensland Shelter. Maree Janine Stanley BA, Cert. Ed, MGPP A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 School of Historical & Philosophical Inquiry Abstract Political support for the inclusion of social policy advocacy groups in the development of public policy is underpinned by a broad belief in the right of citizens to participate in or at least contribute to government decision making. Governments and state agencies consult widely on social issues when they see accountability and transparency as politically attractive, a form of both useful advice and risk management. While scholars have theorised on the benefits of non-state participation, empirical research on the role of policy advocacy groups in the development of Australian public policy is limited. This thesis examines the role of Queensland Shelter Inc., a state based social housing policy peak, in the development of Queensland social housing policy (1987-2012). While consultation processes are open and inclusive of a wide range of stakeholders, participation remains restricted to a select few. Why are some interest groups able to directly participate in the development of public policy while others are only consulted or even ignored? The influence of Queensland Shelter over housing policy has fluctuated over its twenty-five year history. Three factors were examined in relation to this oscillation: the organisational capacity of Queensland Shelter, the willingness of the housing ministry to engage and the broader political context. While the main focus of the study is to assess and analyse shifts in the relationship between Queensland Shelter and the state housing ministry, attention is also given to the connections between Queensland Shelter and other stakeholders, including the bureaucracy, other policy advocacy groups and the Australian federal government.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Highlights 1987 Cabinet Minutes, Queensland State Archives
    Selected Highlights 1987 Cabinet Minutes, Queensland State Archives Dr Tracey Arklay, Susan Horton and Jennifer Menzies, Policy Innovation Hub, Griffith University Policy Innovation Hub, Griffith University 1987 Cabinet Minutes Selected Highlights Table of Contents Fitzgerald Inquiry .................................................................................................................................... 3 Property development ............................................................................................................................ 4 Government ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Industry Assistance, Agricultural Development, Bailouts and Disasters .............................................. 12 Agrarian Socialism and other good causes ........................................................................................... 14 Cape York International Space Port ...................................................................................................... 15 Law and Order ....................................................................................................................................... 16 Environment ......................................................................................................................................... 18 Health ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Courier Mail
    The Media and Indigenous Policy Project Index of Indigenous Health Articles in the Courier-Mail 1988-89, 1994-95, 2002-03 & 2006-07 Compiled by Monica Andrew University of Canberra The articles in this index from 1988-89 and 1994-95 were collected from newspaper clipping files held at the Australian Institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Study (AIATSIS) library. The researchers are grateful to AIATSIS for allowing access to their facilities. The articles from 2002-03 and 2006-07 were collected from the Factiva database. Further information on the methodology for collecting newspaper articles for this project is available at http://www.canberra.edu.au/faculties/arts-design/research/research- centres/news-and-media-research-centre/events/the-media-and-indigenous-policy/the- media-and-indigenous-policy-database © Monica Andrew, 2013 Andrew, Monica (2013), Index of Indigenous Health Articles in the Courier-Mail, 1988-89, 1994-95, 2002-03 & 2006-07, Media and Indigenous Policy Project, University of Canberra. http://www.canberra.edu.au/faculties/arts-design/research/research-centres/news-and-media- research-centre/events/the-media-and-indigenous-policy/the-media-and-indigenous-policy- database Further information about the Media and Indigenous Policy project is available at http://www.canberra.edu.au/faculties/arts-design/research/research-centres/news-and-media- research-centre/events/the-media-and-indigenous-policy The Media and Indigenous Policy project was supported under the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard 21 November 1990
    Legislative Assembly 4955 21 November 1990 NOTE: There could be differences between this document and the official printed Hansard, Vol. 316 WEDNESDAY, 21 NOVEMBER 1990 Mr SPEAKER (Hon. J. Fouras, Ashgrove) read prayers and took the chair at 2.30 p.m. AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT Brisbane City Council and Associated Bodies Accounts Mr SPEAKER: I have to report that I have received from the Auditor-General his report on the books and accounts of the Brisbane City Council and associated bodies for 1990-91. Ordered to be printed. PETITIONS The Clerk announced the receipt of the following petitions— Fencing of Swimming Pools From Mr Borbidge (31 signatories) praying that the Parliament will not legislate to force owners of existing swimming pools to separately fence their pool when it is within a residential block with perimeter fencing. Milk-vendors From Mr Briskey (284 signatories) praying that milk-vendors be allowed to continue to operate and that price widening be not increased. Decriminalisation of Homosexuality From Mr De Lacy (147 signatories) praying for the decriminalisation of homosexuality. A similar petition was received from Mr Foley (440 signatories). Travel Concessions for Tertiary Students From Mr Foley (1 651 signatories) praying for the introduction of half-fare travel tickets for tertiary students. Petitions received. PAPERS The following papers were laid on the table— Orders in Council under— Stamp Act 1894-1990 Statutory Bodies Financial Arrangements Act 1982-1989 Superannuation (State Public Sector) Act 1990 Coal Mining
    [Show full text]