DOCSLIB.ORG

Pacific County Department of Community Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Pacific County Department of Community Development PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH BUILDING SOUTH BEND OFFICE LONG BEACH OFFICE Courthouse Annex 7013 Sandridge Road 1216 W. Robert Bush Drive Long Beach, WA 98631 P.O. Box 68 South Bend, WA 98586 (360)642-9382 FAX (360)642-9387 (360)875-9356 Naselle (360)484-7136 FAX (360)875-9304 Tokeland (360)268-0891 E-Mail Address: [email protected] PACIFIC COUNTY COURTHOUSE National Historic Site STAFF REPORT DATE: January 26, 2011 TO: Pacific County Board of Adjustment FROM: Mike Stevens, Senior Planner Department of Community Development SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 09-0144SB, submitted by Pe Ell North LLC, applicants, and Weyerhaeuser Company, land owner (Development Permit Application No. 15062434000/15062500000). GENERAL INFORMATION: Request: The Coyote Crest Wind Park is a 118 MW Wind Energy Power Generation Facility and 115 kV Transmission Line. The project involves the installation of 47 individual wind turbines which will vary in tower height from 262’ – 328’. Three (3) of the proposed wind turbine towers will be located in Pacific County and are the subject of the requested Conditional Use Permit. The other 44 wind turbine towers will be located in Lewis County. Electrical power from all wind turbine generators will be collected by a project power cable system that delivers the electrical energy to an on-site substation where the power is transformed to 115kV for deliver to the regional power grid. The upgraded transmission line will follow or be located near existing Weyerhaeuser roads and Grays Harbor PUD utility easements in Lewis County and in Grays Harbor County and will run through the existing 115kV substation at Cedarville, Washington, and will continue north and interconnect to the Bonneville Power Administration power line at South Elma, Washington. Location: The project site is located primarily in western Lewis County, north of the community of Doty, Washington. A small portion of the project area will be located in northeastern Pacific County. The transmission lines for the project will extend northward to the Cedarville Substation in Grays Harbor County, where it will interconnect with Grays Harbor PUD and the BPA transmission system. The facilities to be located in Pacific County will be located in Township 15 North, Range 6 West, Section 24 and 25. Public Notice: A Notice of Application and Hearing was published in the Willapa Harbor Herald on January 5, 2011. A Notice of Application and Hearing was sent on January 3, 2011 to all recorded property owners within 300’ of the site. SEPA: Lewis County, Washington was determined to be the Lead Agency in regards to environmental review due to the majority of the project occurring in Lewis County. The Lewis County Department of Community Development developed a Final Environmental Impact Statement for the project. As part of the Board of Adjustment’s deliberation the Board of Adjustment will need to consider adoption of the Final Environmental Impact Statement issued by Lewis County. SITE INFORMATION: Site Characteristics: The entire project site is located upon more than 3,500 acres including 3,240 acres located within the Weyerhaeuser McDonald tree farm and, if approved, an additional 320 acres of public land managed by the Department of Natural Resources. Most of the project, including the portions of the project proposed upon DNR land, is located within Lewis County, Washington. The site(s) consists of land that is primarily timberland, with forest access roads and logging in the immediate vicinity. Adjacent Land Uses: The surrounding land uses consist of commercial forest land. Comprehensive Plan: The Pacific County Comprehensive Plan designates the site as being within the Forest Land of Long-Term Commercial Significance Land-Use Designation. Zoning: The project site is located in the Commercial Forestry Land Zoning District (FC). Critical Areas and Resource Lands: The site does not contain any critical areas regulated by the Pacific County Critical Areas and Resource Lands Ordinance. However, the site does consist of land designated as resource land (Forest Land of Long-Term Commercial Significance). The proposed use is consistent with the regulations contained within Ordinance No. 147, Critical Areas and Resource Lands. ANALYSIS: This Conditional Use Permit request is limited to the portions of the project that are proposed to occur within the jurisdiction of Pacific County. As indicated above, Lewis County, Washington was determined to be the Lead Agency in regards to environmental review due to the majority of the project occurring in Lewis County. The Lewis County Department of Community Development developed a Final Environmental Impact Statement for the project. In addition, the applicants applied for a Special Use Permit and associated variances from Lewis County. Board of Adjustment 09-0144sb Staff Report January 26, 2011 Page 3 The Lewis County Special Use Permit hearing was held on December 20, 2010 at the Lewis County Commissioners Meeting Room, Chehalis, Washington. Pe Ell North LLC has entered into a development lease with Weyerhaeuser Company and has a lease pending with the Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR) for the development of the wind energy resources in the Coyote Crest area of the Doty Hills in Lewis and Pacific Counties. Approximately 3,240 acres within the Coyote Crest Wind Park Lease Area are owned by Weyerhaeuser and are located on the McDonald Tree Farm, while approximately 320 acres are owned by DNR. The total lease area is approximately 3,560 acres, of which only 175 of which will be used for Wind Turbine Generators (WTGs), transmission line, new roads, and support facility. As indicated above, three (3) of the proposed WTGs will be located within Pacific County and are the subject of this Conditional Use Permit. The WTGs within Pacific County are referenced as turbines 1, 3 & 4. The only structures to be built within Pacific County will be the WTGs, all other facilities associated with the wind farm will be constructed in Lewis County. The proposed heights of the turbines vary between 262’ – 328’ depending upon the site. The total height from the ground to the blade tip point (located at the straight up position) depends upon the tower height and will be between 406’ and 471’. Pacific County has determined that the proposed height of the WTGs is consistent with the County’s zoning ordinance as the height restrictions outlined in Ordinance No. 153, Land Use (Sections 6 through 20) do not apply to structures or items placed above roof level and not intended for human occupancy. This determination is consistent with the decision that was made for the wind turbines near Grayland (CCAP Project). It is anticipated that approximately 5.36 acres of new impervious surface will be developed in order to construct and contain the three (3) WTGs. The WTG foundations will cover approximately .07 acres of land, the crane pads will cover approximately 3 acres of land, while new gravel surfaces (including roads) will cover approximately 2.29 acres of land. It should be noted that during the environmental review, Lewis County determined that an EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) was required. As a result, a Draft EIS (DEIS) was prepared pursuant to SEPA. The DEIS was mailed to parties of interest and all comments received were addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) published November 10, 2010. An addendum to the FEIS was issued December 23, 2010 and addresses comments received from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. The addendum does not substantially change the analysis contained in the FEIS or find any new significant impacts. The FEIS devotes special attention to concerns that wind turbines may pose a threat to birds and bats. As set forth in the FEIS, it has been determined that the only federally threatened, endangered or candidate bird or bat species found within the site is the Marbled Murrelet. To provide greater protection to the Marbled Murrelet, as well as other bird and bat species, the FEIS incorporates an “Avian and Bat Protection Plan” (ABPP). The ABPP is intended to minimize avian fatalities and provide continued monitoring. The ABPP further provides mechanisms to adapt its management strategy consistent with the results of its post Board of Adjustment 09-0144sb Staff Report January 26, 2011 Page 4 construction monitoring. The ABPP incorporates a “Curtailment Plan” that calls for a shutdown of the WTGs in the early morning hours during the months of June and July. The FEIS also gives special attention to the visual impact of the WTGs. However, in this instance, the visual impact of the proposed WTGS is largely a nonissue. The only residential area having any appreciable view of the WTGs is the small community of Doty, which is several miles away from the project site. It is worth noting that there has been no public concern about the visual impact of these facilities. Additionally, the WTGs will be painted a non-glare neutral color and outdoor lighting will be kept to the minimum needed for security and safety. Each Board of Adjustment member will be provided a complete packet of information prior to the public hearing on January 26, 2011. Staff recommends that each Board member review the information thoroughly prior to the hearing and familiarize themselves with the project as much as possible as other important information is included that has not been addressed within this Staff Report. Representatives from Pe Ell North LLC will be in attendance during the public hearing and would like the opportunity to give a brief presentation regarding this project to the Board. It is likely that the presentation will include additional information regarding the project that is not included as part of this Staff Report. In order to approve a Conditional Use Permit, the Board of Adjustment must conclude that the proposal meets all of the following criteria.
Recommended publications
  • An Abstract of the Thesis Of

    An Abstract of the Thesis Of

    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Steve Rene' Moothart for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on December 7. 1992. Title: Geology of the Middle and Upper Eocene Mcintosh Formation and Adjacent Volcanic and Sedimentary Rock Units. Willapa Hills. Pacific County. Southwest Washington. Signature redacted for privacy. Abstract approved: Alan R. Niem. The early to middle Eocene submarine basalts of the Crescent Formation form the core and basement of the structurally uplifted Willapa Hills region of southwest Washington. The formation consists of a thick sequence of predominantly subalkaline, tholeiitic pillow basalts and breccias formed as oceanic crust and seamounts at a sea floor spreading ridge or pull apart basin along the rifting continental margin of North America. Radiometric (Ar40 - Ar39) dating of the pillow basalt indicates an age of approximately 53 -55Ma for the formation. Foraminifera collected from mudstones interbedded with the pillow basalts of the Crescent Formation in southwestern Pacific County indicate a Ulatisian to lower Narizian (middle Eocene) age for the basalts and suggest that they were erupted in lower-middle bathyal(1500 -2000 m) water depths. Locally associated with the pillow basalts are hyaloclastic basalt breccias and basaltic sandstones. Overlying, and interbedded with the basalts of the Crescent Formation is the middle and upper Eocene Mcintosh Formation, which is composed of three members (informal). Stratigraphically from the lowest, these members are: 1) Fork Creek member; 2) Lebarn member, 3) McIntosh Volcanics member. The Fork Creek member consists of a thick sequence of normally graded, micaceous, coarse- to fine-grained, arkosic and lithic arkosic sandstones deposited by sand-rich, high concentration turbidity currents in the deep marine-marginal basin.
  • Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan

    Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan

    Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan For Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation Prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc. and Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. March 17, 2009 Table of Contents Resolution No. 2009-51 of Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation to adopt CFHMP .............. Letter of Approval for CFHMP from Washington State Department of Ecology I. Overview ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 I. A. Authority and Funding............................................................................................................................ 1 I. B. Plan Development Process ................................................................................................................... 1 I. B. 1. Public Meetings and Advisory Group ........................................................................................... 2 I. B. 2. Determination of Need for Flood Control Work: Short-term and Long-term Goals of the CFHMP .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 I. B. 3. Project Approach ............................................................................................................................. 4 I. B. 4. Plan Organization ............................................................................................................................ 5 II.
  • Petroleum Geology of the State of Washington

    Petroleum Geology of the State of Washington

    Petroleum Geology of the State of Washington By Samuel Y. Johnson, Marilyn E. Tennyson, William S. Lingley, Jr. and Ben E. Law T OF EN TH TM E U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1582 R I A N P T E E D R . I O S . R U M 9 A 8 4 R C H 3, 1 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Petroleum geology of the State of Washington / by Samuel Y. Johnson. p. cm. — (U.S. Geoloigcal Survey professional paper ; 1582) Includes bibliographical references. 1. Petroleum—Geology—Washington. I. Johnson, Samuel Y. II. Series. TN782.W2P48 1998 553.2′8′09797—dc21 97–23966 CIP AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the monthly catalog “New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey.” Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications re- leased prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual “Price and Availability List.” Publications that may be listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual “Price and Availability List” may no longer be available.
  • KLICKITAT RIVER AREA Feo, Ti02, P20 5, and K20 Contents Than Other Flows in the Section and Has Higher Concentrations of Mgo and in the Klickitat River Area (Fig

    KLICKITAT RIVER AREA Feo, Ti02, P20 5, and K20 Contents Than Other Flows in the Section and Has Higher Concentrations of Mgo and in the Klickitat River Area (Fig

    Intracanyon flows, Columbia River Basalt Group 259 / I .,,,,. / FRENCHMAN SPRINGS unconformity MEMBER ~ Figure I 1.-Contact relations of the Pomona Member intracanyon flow in the Viento Park area (shown in Fig. 10). View to the southwest from Interstate Highway 84. White lenses in the conglomerate are a quartzofeld­ spathic sandstone. ric, it commonly bas a greater (by a factor of 2 to 3) columns 5 to 15 cm wide. This flow outwardly resem­ concentration of phenocrysts than that in less phyric bles older Columbia River basalt flows in each of the areas. Where rich in phenocrysts, this unit takes on a areas discussed in this paper. It particularly resembles truly porphyritic character. Abundant phenocrysts and the Grande Ronde Basalt, which is by far the domi­ the presence of megascopic olivine led some early nant exposed unit within the Columbia River Gorge. mappers to misidentify the Pomona Member as an This resemblance bas contributed to past confusion olivine basalt of Cascadian origin, an understandable regarding the identification and recognition of intra­ error. canyon relations (Allen, 1932; Wells and Peck, 1961; The Pomona Member, like the Priest Rapids Sceva, 1966; Kienle, 1971; Waters, 1973; Beaulieu, Member, has reversed paleomagnetic polarity. How­ 1977). ever, the chemistry of these two units is quite different (Table I). The Pomona Member has relatively lower KLICKITAT RIVER AREA FeO, Ti02, P20 5, and K20 contents than other flows in the section and has higher concentrations of MgO and In the Klickitat River area (Fig. 10), a canyon CaO than the others. These differences are summa­ approximately l km wide and more than l 00 m deep rized in detail in Swanson and others {1979a).
  • Summits on the Air USA (W7W)

    Summits on the Air USA (W7W)

    Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7W) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S39.1 Issue number 2.0 Date of issue 01-Dec-2016 Participation start date 01-July-2009 Authorised Date 08-Jul-2009 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Darryl Holman, WW7D, [email protected] Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Summits on the Air – ARM for USA W7W-Washington Table of contents Change Control ................................................................................................................... 4 Disclaimer ........................................................................................................................... 5 Copyright Notices ............................................................................................................... 5 1.0 Association Reference Data .......................................................................................... 6 2.1 Program Derivation ....................................................................................................... 7 2.2 General Information ...................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Final Access, Activation Zone, and Operating Location Explained ............................. 8 2.4 Rights of Way and Access Issues ................................................................................
  • Pacific Region Partners for Fish and Wildlife and Coastal Program Strategic Plan

    Pacific Region Partners for Fish and Wildlife and Coastal Program Strategic Plan

    Pacific Region Partners for Fish and Wildlife and Coastal Program Strategic Plan July 2007 Table of Contents Executive Summary..............................................................................................................................1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................2 How to Use This Plan ...............................................................................................................3 Summary of Stakeholder Input .................................................................................................3 Overview of Region..................................................................................................................4 Ecological Diversity......................................................................................................5 Land Ownership Patterns..............................................................................................7 Threats.......................................................................................................................................7 Pacific Northwest..........................................................................................................7 Pacific Islands ...............................................................................................................8 Region 1 Conservation Initiatives.......................................................................................................10
  • Eocene Stratigraphy

    Eocene Stratigraphy

    State of Washington ARTHUR B. LANGLIE, Governor Department of Conservation and Development W. A. GALBRAITH. Director DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY SHELDON L. GLOVER, Supervisor Bulletin No. 43 EOCENE STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOWER COWLITZ RIVER­ EASTERN WILLAPA HILLS AREA, SOUTHWESTERN WASHINGTON By DONALD ANTON HENRIKSEN STAT£ ,..RINTl~G PLANT. OLYMPIA, WASH,. 19,15 ~ For sale by Department or Conservation and Oevelopment, Olympia, Wasrungton. Price, $1.50. FOREWORD This bulletin deals with a part of southwestern Washington for which only general information has been previously available. The details of structure and stratigraphy throughout much of the area have been unknown, and the igneous rocks of the area have hereto­ fore received only perfunctory attention. The data here provided will be of interest to anyone concerned with the geology of this part of the state, not only for specific use in the area under discussion but also in studies of adjacent areas where similar rocks occur. The field work upon which the report is based was done by the author during the summer seasons of 1951, 1952, and 1953. The report, when completed, was a dissertation submitted to the School of Mineral Sciences and the Committee on Graduate Study of Stanford University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geology. The Division of Mines and Geology is grateful to the author, Dr. Donald A. Henriksen, for his permission to publish the report as Bulletin No. 43 of its series of geologic studies of Washington, thus making the material more generally available than it might other­ wise be.
  • Pacific Region Partners for Fish and Wildlife and Coastal Program Strategic Plan

    Pacific Region Partners for Fish and Wildlife and Coastal Program Strategic Plan

    Pacific Region Partners for Fish and Wildlife and Coastal Program Strategic Plan July 2010 UPDATE Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Overview of Region 1 ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Five Program Goals from the Service Vision Document .............................................................. 7 Goal 1: Conserve Habitat .................................................................................................................. 7 Goal 2: Broaden and Strengthen Partnerships ....................................................................................... 15 Goal 3: Improve Information Sharing and Communication ................................................................... 17 Goal 4: Enhance Our Workforce .......................................................................................................... 18 Goal 5: Increase Accountability ............................................................................................................... 20 Figure 1: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Islands Ecoregion .............................................................. 6 Figure 2: U.S. EPA Level III
  • 2009 Lewis County Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan

    2009 Lewis County Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan

    LEWIS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD HAZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared for Lewis County, Washington January 2009 LEWIS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD HAZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared for Lewis County, Washington January, 2009 701 Pike Street, Suite 1200 Seattle, Washington, 98101 280 Summer Street Boston, MA 02210 Table of Contents Lewis County Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................................................................ V LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................................................... V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................................................1 1. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose and Goals.......................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Plan Organization .........................................................................................................................................1-2 1.3 CFHMP Requirements..................................................................................................................................1-2 1.4 Planning