DOCSLIB.ORG

Lesson 16 II Kings 9-14 Jehu, King of Israel, and His House

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lesson 16 II Kings 9-14 Jehu, King of Israel, and His House Lesson 16 II Kings 9-14 Jehu, King of Israel, and his house Introduc)on Last week we studied the transition between Elijah and Elisha and the transitions of several kings of Israel and Judah. It is important to remember that the land of Israel has become a divided state following the reign of Solomon, Israel represents the ten northern tribes and Judah comprises the tribes of Judah and Benjamin in the south. The Levites are dispersed among both regions as they received no tribal land under Joshua in the conquering of Canaan. Each area, Israel and Judah operated as independent monarchies. We haven’t spoken much of the time frame of the kings of Israel and the separation of Israel and Judah. This section of II Kings begins about 840 years before the birth of Christ and covers about 90 years. Chapter 9 The anointing of Jehu, king over Israel Vs. 1-3 Joram, son of Ahab, is king of Israel and has been wounded in battle against King Hazael of Aram. Elisha called for and sent one of his young prophets who served God to take a flask of oil, search out Jehu at Ramoth-Gilead. When Jehu is located, the prophet was to ask him to meet in a private place, anoint his head with oil to declare him the next king of Israel, then leave (flee) immediately. Jehu is an interesting character as verse 2 describes him as the son of Jehoshaphat, king of Judah, and yet he is serving as the commander of the armies of Joram, king of Israel. Vs. 4-10 The young prophet located Jehu at Ramoth-Gilead, and outpost of the military about 40 miles east of Jezreel, sitting in a house with his captains. The prophet asked for a private meeting with Jehu so they entered a back room where the prophet anointed his head with the oil and spoke these words, “Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel, I have anointed you king of the people of the LORD, even all Israel. You shall strike the house of Ahab, your master, that I may avenge the blood of My servants, the prophets, and the blood of all the servants of the LORD, at the hand of Jezebel. For the whole house of Ahab shall perish, and I will cut off from Ahab every male person, both bond and free in Israel. I will make the house of Ahab like the house of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, and like the house of Baasha the son of Ahijah. The dogs shall eat Jezebel in the territory of Jezreel, and none shall bury her”. When Jehu emerged from this meeting, the prophet had fled, and his captains asked the meaning of the meeting. When told of the anointing, his captains all pledged allegiance to the new king and proclaimed him king. It is interesting that back in I Kings 19:16 God sends Elijah to Damascus to anoint Jehu to be the king over Israel, but his service will come at a later time. We are reminded of the curse of Ahab and Jezebel located in I Kings 21:20-26. At !1 that time Ahab repented of his evil and the curse was put on hold till a later day. This is to be that day. Vs. 14-20 Jehu swore his men to secrecy and prepared t go to Jezreel where King Joram was recovering from battle wounds. At this same time King Ahaziah (Judah) was traveling to Jezreel to visit Joram. Vs. 21-26 After sending messengers to the approaching Jehu, King Joram himself rode out in his chariot to inquire of the meaning of this visit. When he realized Jehu was there for treachery, he turned his chariot around and fled, but Jehu shot him through the heart with an arrow and Joram died in the plot of land that had one time belonged to Naboth, the man killed by Jezebel so Ahab could have this vineyard for a garden (I Kings 21). Vs. 27-28 Jehu also struck Ahaziah, King of Judah, but the king managed to flee to Megiddo before he died. His servants carried his remains to Jerusalem where he was buried. Vs. 29-37 Jehu returned to Jezreel where Jezebel chided him from an upper window for his treachery against the king. Jehu ordered her attendants to cast her out of the upper window where she burst open and her blood was splattered on the wall and on the horses. Jehu had the horses trample her underfoot. He ordered his men to bury her since she was a king’s daughter, but when the men went to retrieve her body, it was not there, only her skull, feet and the palms of her hands could be located, for the dogs had eaten all the rest of her body, just as had been prophesied (I Kings 21:23). Chapter 10 Jehu begins to restore Israel Vs. 1-11 Ahab had 70 sons, scattered around Samaria with trusted caretakers. The curse on Ahab was that his entire house would be destroyed, all sons and all servants, both bond and free. His name would be blotted out. Jehu began by sending correspondence to all the caretakers of the 70 sons demanding that the sons be forced to fight for the throne of Ahab. The caretakers rejected this idea very respectfully so Jehu simply asked the caretakers to bring the head of each of the 70 sons to him at Jezreel the next day. The guardians of the sons complied with the request and brought the head of each son in baskets. Jehu had the heads placed in two heaps at the gates of the city until morning. The next morning Jehu killed all of those of the house of Ahab in fulfillment of the curses that were spoken by Elijah. Vs. 12-14 Jehu arose and went to Samaria, and along the way he met a traveling party, relatives of King Ahaziah of Judah who were on their way to visit the sons of Ahab and the queen mother, Jezebel. Ahaziah, though the king of Judah, was a relative of Ahab’s, and therefore these people fell under the curse spoken by Elijah, and therefore Jehu killed all forty two of them ( II Kings 8:24-27). Jehu had killed Ahaziah earlier. !2 Vs. 15-17 Here we are introduced to a new companion to King Jehu, Jehonadab, son of Rechab. The term “son of Rechab” does not seem to apply to the name of Jehonadab’s father but rather the people of whom he is descended. The Rechabites were an interesting, non-Jewish nomadic people who traveled throughout both north and southern Israel. The Rechabites were descendents of Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, also known as the Kenites. History records that they were God-fearers, opposed to pagan deity worship, did not drink wine and maintained a unique relationship with God. History records a tie between the Rachabites and the Jewish Sanhedrin. They were thought to be the scribes of the Sanhedrin. Jehu meets Jehonadab and asked, “Is your heart right, as my heart is with your heart”. With a positive response Jehu welcomed Jehonadab into the chariot, returned to Samaria and killed all the remaining descendents of Ahab. Vs. 18-27 Jehu called all the people together and announced that King Ahab had worshipped Baal, and he too planned a great sacrifice for Baal. Therefore, all, every single one of the priests of Baal were to appear before Jehu for this great sacrifice. Failure to show up for this event meant certain death. Not only did the priests of Baal show up, every Israelite man who worshipped the Baal showed up for this great sacrifice as well so that the entire House of Baal was filled from front to back, side to side. Jehu instructed the Baal worshippers to look around them and make sure there was no worshipper of Adonai amongst them, and if there was, they were to be pointed out and removed. And the worship of Baal was about to commence. Jehu appointed and placed 80 of his men outside the Baal temple with instructions that every man who came to worship Baal was to be killed. As soon as the animal offerings to Baal were completed, Jehu sent guards in to slay all the Baal worshippers, remove the pillars of the temple to burn them. A public latrine was made in the location of the Baal Temple. Vs. 28-33 Jehu eradicated the worship of Baal from all of Israel, yet he stopped short of destroying the temples and golden calves at Dan and Bethel that were erected by Jeroboam. However, God blessed Jehu for eradicating Baal worship, for fulfilling the curse against Ahab and his family, and the blessing is that Jehu’s sons would sit on the throne even to the fourth generation. Though Jehu destroyed the Baal worship, he continued leading Israel in the sins of Jeroboam and did not follow the statutes of God. Because Jehu did not follow in the ways of the LORD, God began to cut off portions of Israel by the hand of Hazael, King of Aram, Hazael captured and controlled all of Israel’s land east of the Jordan River, the tribes of Gad, Rueben and Manasseh. !3 Vs. 34-36 Jehu reigned over Israel for 28 years and died and his son Jehoahaz followed him on the throne. Note: This is an amazing story when you step back and look at it from a different angle or level.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2 Kings Chapter 14
    2 Kings Chapter 14 Verses 14:1 – 15:38: This section quickly surveys the kings and selected events of the northern and southern kingdoms from 796 to 735 B.C. in contrast to the previous 19 chapters (1 Kings 17:1 – 2 Kings 13:25), which narrated 90 years of history (885-796 B.C.). With a concentration on the ministries of Elijah and Elisha during the final 65 years of that period (860-796 B.C.), 62 years are covered in these two chapters. The previous section concluded with a shadow of hope. Officially sanctioned Baal worship had been eradicated in both Israel (10:18-28), and Judah (11:17-18); the temple of the Lord in Jerusalem had been repaired (12:9-15); and the Syrian threat to Israel had been overcome (13:25). However, this section emphasizes that the fundamental problems remained. The false religion established by Jeroboam I continued in Israel even with the change of royal families (14:24-15:9, 18, 24, 28). And the high places were not removed in Judah even though there were only good kings there during those years (14:4; 15:4, 35). 2 Kings 14:1 "In the second year of Joash son of Jehoahaz king of Israel reigned Amaziah the son of Joash king of Judah." “Second year”: 796 B.C. “Amaziah”: (See notes on 2 Chron. 25:1-28). In chapter 12 verse 21, we read of Amaziah reigning in Judah in the place of his father Joash, who had died. The Joash of Israel and the Joash of Judah reigned at the same time for a short period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Assyrian Empire, the Conquest of Israel, and the Colonization of Judah 37 I
    ISRAEL AND EMPIRE ii ISRAEL AND EMPIRE A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism Leo G. Perdue and Warren Carter Edited by Coleman A. Baker LONDON • NEW DELHI • NEW YORK • SYDNEY 1 Bloomsbury T&T Clark An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Imprint previously known as T&T Clark 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com Bloomsbury, T&T Clark and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2015 © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Authors of this work. No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the authors. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: HB: 978-0-56705-409-8 PB: 978-0-56724-328-7 ePDF: 978-0-56728-051-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset by Forthcoming Publications (www.forthpub.com) 1 Contents Abbreviations vii Preface ix Introduction: Empires, Colonies, and Postcolonial Interpretation 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • 1-And-2 Kings
    FROM DAVID TO EXILE 1 & 2 Kings by Daniel J. Lewis © copyright 2009 by Diakonos, Inc. Troy, Michigan United States of America 2 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Composition and Authorship ...................................................................................................................... 5 Structure ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Theological Motifs ..................................................................................................................................... 7 The Kingship of Solomon (1 Kings 1-11) .....................................................................................................13 Solomon Succeeds David as King (1:1—2:12) .........................................................................................13 The Purge (2:13-46) ..................................................................................................................................16 Solomon‟s Wisdom (3-4) ..........................................................................................................................17 Building the Temple and the Palace (5-7) .................................................................................................20 The Dedication of the Temple (8) .............................................................................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham Athaliah and Alexandra: Gender and Queenship
    University of Birmingham Athaliah and Alexandra: Gender and Queenship in Josephus Scales, Joseph; Quine, Cat Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Scales, J & Quine, C 2020, 'Athaliah and Alexandra: Gender and Queenship in Josephus', Journal of Ancient Judaism, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 233–250. Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive. If you believe that this is the case for this document, please contact [email protected] providing details and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate.
    [Show full text]
  • Intertextual Connection to the Elijah/Jezebel
    Scholars Crossing LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations 2005 Femme Fatale Redux: Intertextual Connection to the Elijah/ Jezebel Narratives in Mark 6:14–29 Gary E. Yates Liberty University, [email protected] David M. Hoffeditz Cedarville University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs Recommended Citation Yates, Gary E. and Hoffeditz, David M., "Femme Fatale Redux: Intertextual Connection to the Elijah/ Jezebel Narratives in Mark 6:14–29" (2005). LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations. 4. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bulletin for Biblical Research 15.2 (2005) 199-221. Femme Fatale Redux: Intertextual Connection to the Elijah/ Jezebel Narratives in Mark 6:14–29 DAVID M. HOFFEDITZ AND GARY E. YATES CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY LIBERTY UNIVERSITY In this article we trace important intertextual connections between the pe- ricopes of the beheading of John in Mark’s Gospel and the OT narratives sur- rounding the figures of Jezebel and Elijah. This form of intertextuality serves three key polemical purposes in Mark’s narrative: 1. to highlight the culpability and despicability of Herodias in having John put to death by depicting her as another Jezebel—the epitome of female wickedness in the OT; 2. to demonstrate the irony of reversal in that the OT narrative has the word of the prophet putting the wicked queen to death, while in the NT, the word of the wicked queen succeeds in bringing about the death of the prophet; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Athaliah, a Treacherous Queen: a Careful Analysis of Her Story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21
    Athaliah, a treacherous queen: A careful analysis of her story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21 Robin Gallaher Branch School of Biblical Sciences & Bible Languages Potchefstroom Campus North-West University POTCHEFSTROOM E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Athaliah, a treacherous queen: A careful analysis of her story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21 This article presents a critical look at the story of the reign of Athaliah, the only ruling queen of Israel or Judah in the biblical text. Double reference in 2 Kings and 2 Chronicles shows her story’s importance and significance to the biblical writers. The largely parallel accounts read like a contemporary soap opera, for they contain murder, intrigue, harem politics, religious upheaval, and coup and counter-coup. Her story provides insights on the turbulent political climate of the ninth century BC. However, the purpose of the biblical writers is not to show Athaliah as the epitome of evil or that all women in power are evil. Opsomming Atalia, ’n verraderlike koningin: ’n noukeurige analise van haar verhaal in 2 Konings 11 en 2 Kronieke 22:10-23:21 In hierdie artikel word die verhaal van Atalia krities nagegaan. Atalia was naamlik die enigste koninging van Israel of Juda wie se regeringstyd in die Bybelteks verhaal word. Die dubbele verwysings na hierdie tyd in 2 Konings en 2 Kronieke dui op die belangrikheid en betekenis van haar verhaal vir die Bybel- skrywers. Die twee weergawes wat grotendeels parallelle weer- gawes is, lees byna soos ’n hedendaagse sepie, want hierdie verhale sluit elemente in soos moord, intrige, harempolitiek, godsdiensopstand, staatsgreep en kontrastaatsgreep.
    [Show full text]
  • Chart of the Kings of Israel and Judah
    The Kings of Israel & Judah Why Study the Kings? Chart of the Kings Questions for Discussion The Heritage of Jesus Host: Alan's Gleanings Alphabetical List of the Kings A Comment about Names God's Message of Salvation Kings of the United Kingdom (c 1025-925 BC) Relationship to God's King Previous King Judgment Saul none did evil Ishbosheth* son (unknown) David none did right Solomon did right in youth, son (AKA Jedidiah) evil in old age * The kingdom was divided during Ishbosheth's reign; David was king over the tribe of Judah. Kings of Judah (c 925-586 BC) Kings of Israel (c 925-721 BC) Relationship to God's Relationship to God's King King Previous King Judgment Previous King Judgment Rehoboam son did evil Abijam Jeroboam servant did evil son did evil (AKA Abijah) Nadab son did evil Baasha none did evil Asa son did right Elah son did evil Zimri captain did evil Omri captain did evil Ahab son did evil Jehoshaphat son did right Ahaziah son did evil Jehoram son did evil (AKA Joram) Jehoram son of Ahab did evil Ahaziah (AKA Joram) (AKA Azariah son did evil or Jehoahaz) Athaliah mother did evil Jehu captain mixed Joash did right in youth, son of Ahaziah Jehoahaz son did evil (AKA Jehoash) evil in old age Joash did right in youth, son did evil Amaziah son (AKA Jehoash) evil in old age Jeroboam II son did evil Zachariah son did evil did evil Uzziah Shallum none son did right (surmised) (AKA Azariah) Menahem none did evil Pekahiah son did evil Jotham son did right Pekah captain did evil Ahaz son did evil Hoshea none did evil Hezekiah son did right Manasseh son did evil Amon son did evil Josiah son did right Jehoahaz son did evil (AKA Shallum) Jehoiakim Assyrian captivity son of Josiah did evil (AKA Eliakim) Jehoiachin (AKA Coniah son did evil or Jeconiah) Zedekiah son of Josiah did evil (AKA Mattaniah) Babylonian captivity Color Code Legend: King did right King did evil Other.
    [Show full text]
  • "Foremost in Rank, Foremost in Power"
    "FOREMOST IN RANK AND FOREMOST IN POWER": CONFLICT OVER THE FIRST-BORN IN ISRAEL HARVEY SICHERMAN & GILAD J. GEVARYAHU When the patriarch Jacob blessed his children on the verge of his death, he de- scribed Reuben as 'My first-born, first of my strength, first of my vitality . foremost in rank and foremost in power' (Gen. 49:4). But he disqualified Reuben for reasons of personality (unstable as water [49:4]) and for his act of consorting with Bilhah, Jacob's concubine (35:22).1 Moreover, Jacob did not as- sign Reuben's privileges to one other son, but rather to three other sons. As the Targum Jonathan (49:3) writes, "The birthright was given to Joseph." Jacob had earlier made clear that Joseph's two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, would be regarded as his own, thus giving to the first-born son of his favorite wife, Rachel, the double portion usually accorded to the eldest son.2 Further- more, in the course of that earlier blessing, Jacob elevated Ephraim, the younger son, above his older brother Manasseh, despite Joseph's protest. Secondly, the Targum notes that "the kingship was given to Judah." In the long discourse popularly known as the Blessing of Jacob, the patriarch assigned Judah the right to rule (49:9-10), exalting his strength and promising that, the scepter shall not depart from Judah until he come to Shiloh, and to him will as- semble all the nations, (49:10).3 Finally, the Targum concludes "the priesthood was given to Levi." Each of these reassignments was linked to physical location: Joseph to Shechem, Judah to Shiloh, and Levi to the place that the Lord thy God will choose from among all the tribes to place His name there.
    [Show full text]
  • Semitica 62, 2020, P
    Athaliah and the Theopolitics of Royal Assassination Cat Quine University of Nottingham Abstract. While the kingdom of Israel experienced eight military coups in its shorter his- tory, the kingdom of Judah saw only four assassinations of its monarchs, three of which were Athaliah, her usurper, and his successor.1 This sequence of untimely royal deaths in Judah stands in contrast to the stability of Israel’s royal line under the Jehuite dynasty, whose kings are said to have entreated Yahweh, sought advice from prophets, and defeated Judah at Beth-Shemesh. From a later perspective it seems that whereas Yahweh previously protected the Judahite kings, in the ninth-eighth centuries BCE the Jehuite kings enjoyed Yahweh’s favour more than the Davidides. This paper thus considers the theopolitical im- pact of untimely royal deaths in ninth-eighth century Judah and argues that the instability of the Judahite royal line after her marriage contributed to the negative biblical portrayal of Athaliah and the Omride-Judahite alliance. Résumé. Cependant que le royaume d’Israël a connu huit coups d’État, le royaume de Juda n’a subi que quatre assassinats royaux, parmi lesquels Athalie, son usurpateur et son suc- cesseur. Cette séquence tranche avec la stabilité de la dynastie jéhuite, dont les rois implo- rent Yahvé, cherchent conseil auprès des prophètes, et défont Juda à Beth-Shémesh. De ce point de vue, il semble qu’aux IXᵉ-VIIIᵉ s. av. J.-Ch. les rois jéhuites bénéficient plus que les davidides de la faveur de Yahvé, alors même que ce dernier protégeait jusqu’alors les rois judaïtes.
    [Show full text]
  • JOASH – (II Kings 12:1-2)
    Series: Bible Characters JOASH – (II Kings 12:1-2) 1. The name “Jehoash” is also the name “Joash” (2 Kings 11:2). 2. There are two meanings of the name Joash. a. “Jehovah supports, hastens to help.” b. “Jehovah has given.” 3. Background info. a. Joash was the son of king Ahaziah. b. Ahaziah was the son of Jehoram and his wife Athaliah. c. Athaliah was the daughter of Ahab and Jezebel. d. King Ahaziah of Judah was killed by Jehu, the king of Israel (northern kingdom). e. When Ahaziah died, his mother Athaliah rose up and tried to kill all of the royal seed. As for the reason, Henry Morris states that she “had persuaded [Jehoram, her husband] to follow the Baalite idolatry of her parents rather than the true worship of Jehovah…” Coming from such a wicked line, Omri, Ahab, and Jezebel, it is certain that “she wanted to establish Baalism as the state religion of Judah.”1 After the death of her son Ahaziah, she had been in total reign for about a year and all the children of royal seed (David’s line) were very young. She took this opportunity to slay them all and continue the line of Ahab who was a usurper of the throne and not of the seed royal. She murdered all she could find thinking she had destroyed David’s line. But we must remember that God is in control. In this lesson I want us to see that who we surround ourselves with will indeed influence us for right or wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • H 02-UP-011 Assyria Io02
    he Hebrew Bible records the history of ancient Israel reign. In three different inscriptions, Shalmaneser III and Judah, relating that the two kingdoms were recounts that he received tribute from Tyre, Sidon, and united under Saul (ca. 1000 B.C.) Jehu, son of Omri, in his 18th year, tand became politically separate fol- usually figured as 841 B.C. Thus, Jehu, lowing Solomon’s death (ca. 935 B.C.). the next Israelite king to whom the The division continued until the Assyrians refer, appears in the same Assyrians, whose empire was expand- order as described in the Bible. But he ing during that period, exiled Israel is identified as ruling a place with a in the late eighth century B.C. different geographic name, Bit Omri But the goal of the Bible was not to (the house of Omri). record history, and the text does not One of Shalmaneser III’s final edi- shy away from theological explana- tions of annals, the Black Obelisk, tions for events. Given this problem- contains another reference to Jehu. In atic relationship between sacred the second row of figures from the interpretation and historical accura- top, Jehu is depicted with the caption, cy, historians welcomed the discovery “Tribute of Iaua (Jehu), son of Omri. of ancient Assyrian cuneiform docu- Silver, gold, a golden bowl, a golden ments that refer to people and places beaker, golden goblets, pitchers of mentioned in the Bible. Discovered gold, lead, staves for the hand of the in the 19th century, these historical king, javelins, I received from him.”As records are now being used by schol- scholar Michele Marcus points out, ars to corroborate and augment the Jehu’s placement on this monument biblical text, especially the Bible’s indicates that his importance for the COPYRIGHT THE BRITISH MUSEUM “historical books” of Kings.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestry of Jehu Cox Knox County, Kentucky, Was
    Ancestry of Jehu Cox Knox County, Kentucky, was chosen by providence for the advent of Jehu Cox. Destiny ruled that he would be a great empire builder, a champion of Mormonism, and the ancestor of a great family of truth seekers. Kentucky, his "Old Kentucky Home" takes the name from an Indian name, meaning, "Land of Tomorrow," was first discovered by Marquette and Joliet in 1673. The Iroquoians whom Marquette found in the region described their country as a meadow land--a truly accurate description. The area was an ideal hunting ground for the Indians. Before the coming of the white man the Indian tribes prized the area so highly that a life and death struggle ensued for its possession. It was truly a "Dark and Bloody Ground" when Daniel Boone first explored it in 1767. Eight years later (1775) Daniel built the wilderness Road from Virginia into Kentucky. This famous road (later used by the Cox family) followed an Indian trail to the top of the Appalachian Mountains--better known as Cumberland Gap--then down the Cumberland River into Kentucky and Tennessee. For a century after 1775 a stream of settlers followed that road to find new homes in the west. Kentucky was given statehood June 1, 1792, eleven years before the advent of Jehu. The time chosen by providence for the advent of Jehu was September 5, 1803, simultaneously with his arrival the American people were passing through a great crisis. Tensions had been caused by the Louisiana issue. Napoleon had stolen this territory from Spain and was then offering it for sale to the United States.
    [Show full text]