Too Many Wrongfully Convicted

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Too Many Wrongfully Convicted 200 TOO MANY WRONGFULLY CONVICTED AN INNOCENCE PROJECT REPORT ON THE FIRST 200 DNA EXONERATIONS IN THE U.S. BENJAMIN N. CARDOZO SCHOOL OF LAW, YESHIVA UNIVERSITY INTRODUCTION The people you will meet in this booklet did not simply endure injustice that nobody else can begin to imagine; they prevailed. Each and every one of them was proven innocent — simply, elegantly and definitively — through DNA testing. We are privileged to know most of the 200 people whose stories follow. Without warning or cause, all of them were swept off the streets one day, forcibly separated from their families and friends, and wrongfully imprisoned for years or, often, decades. Some narrowly escaped execution. Even in their first days of freedom, the euphoria that many exonerated people feel is tempered by a profoundly personal understanding of the larger problem and an unwavering resolve to help fix a broken system. They don’t want anyone else to be robbed of life and liberty as they were. When we founded the Innocence Project in 1992, we wanted to walk as many innocent people out of prison as possible — and to turn the horror each one experienced into a “learning moment” that could help repair the systemic failings in our criminal justice system. The demand for our services has grown tremendously, as has the network of organizations working tirelessly to free the innocent and reform the system. Today, there are more than 35 organizations in the Innocence Network, and many of them helped exonerate the individuals in this booklet. Together, we are in a race against time — a race to test evidence before it is destroyed, and to prove the truth before one of our innocent clients spends one more birthday behind bars. And we are in a race against time to reform the criminal justice system before more innocent people are wrongfully convicted. The most common question we are asked is, “How many innocent people are in prison?” Nobody truly knows the answer — but the question itself is haunting, since it reflects the common knowledge that there are undoubtedly more. Because just a small fraction of cases involve evidence that could be tested for DNA — and even when such evidence exists, it is often lost or destroyed — we know that these first 200 DNA exonerations are the tip of the iceberg. Each wrongful conviction that has been overturned through DNA evidence could have been prevented if eyewitness procedures had been better, if interrogations had been recorded, if crime labs had been subjected to greater oversight, if the system had been more skeptical of jailhouse informants, or if other reforms had been in place. Since the first person in the U.S. was exonerated through DNA, states, counties and individual law enforcement agencies have enacted these reforms. Our mandate — society’s duty to these 200 people and the ones who will follow them — is to free more innocent people while fixing the system to prevent wrongful convictions. We owe these people, and ourselves, no less. Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld www.innocenceproject.org | 1 200GARY DOTSON • 1989 DAVID VASQUEZ • 1989 EDWARD GREEN • 1990 CHARLES DABBS • 1991 BRUCE NELSON • 1991 YEARS YEARS YEAR YEARS YEARS 10 ILLINOIS 4 VIRGINIA 1 DISTRICT OF 7 NEW YORK 9 PENNSYLVANIA COLUMBIA Based on eyewitness David Vasquez, who Edward Green was Charles Dabbs is the In 1982, Bruce Nelson 2misidentification,0 Gary has substantial0 apprehended in 1987 distant cousin of a was implicated in a Dotson was convicted cognitive limitations, at a location where woman who was raped rape and murder based of rape and aggravated pled guilty to murder. both a rape and an in 1982. She identified on the confession of TOO MANY WRONGkidnappingFULLY in May COHisNVI “dreamCTED statement,” attempted rape had Dabbs as one of her Terrence Moore, who 1979. The victim along with his lack of occurred. The victims of assailants, saying that was also charged eventually recanted TanO alibi,O convinced MAN a Yboth WR crimesONG identified FULLYthe man who rapedCO herNVIwithCTED the crime. When her testimony, saying jury of his guilt, and Green, and he was wore clothing similar police questioned she had fabricated the he was convicted in convicted. Prior to his to his. DNA testing Nelson (with Moore TOrape.O Still,MAN Dotson Y WR1985. ONGHe served FULLYfour sentencing, CO his NVIlawyers CTEDexonerated Dabbs also present in the served four more years years before DNA secured DNA testing seven years after his room), Nelson asked behind bars before he testing exonerated him. of the evidence and conviction. Moore what he had was fully exonerated Green was excluded previously told police — through DNA testing. as the perpetrator. and that question was used as a confession in Nelson’s trial. In 1990, the prosecution agreed to subject several pieces of evidence to DNA testing, which proved 200Nelson’s innocence. THE FIRST * 200 Of the first 200 people exonerated through DNA: Each individual exonerated through DNA is unique. Their convictions They served an average of were different, and their experiences after exoneration vary. Collectively, 1 they illustrate the criminal justice’s failings and the need for reform. *Percentage is based on a subset of the 200 exoneration cases, where information was available to make a determination. 2 | Innocence Project TOO MANY WRONGFULLY CONVICTED GLEN WOODALL • 1992 STEVEN LINSCOTT • 1992 JOE JONES • 1992 LEONARD CALLACE •1992 KERRY KOTLER • 1992 .5 YEARS YEARS .5 YEARS .5 YEARS .5 YEARS 4 WEST VIRGINIA 3 ILLINOIS6 KANSAS 5 NEW YORK10 NEW YORK Glen Woodall was In 1982, Steven Outside a nightclub that Leonard Callace was In 1978 and again in sentenced to two life Linscott was convicted Joe Jones frequented, charged with sexually 1981, a man in a ski sentences plus 203 to of murdering his a woman was kidnapped assaulting a young mask raped and robbed 335 years for two neighbor. Linscott told and raped in 1985. woman in the parking a woman at knifepoint 20rapes. Since neither 0police that he had Based on eyewitness lot of a shopping in her home. She 20victim clearly0 saw the dreamt about the crime, misidentification and center. Based on identified Kerry Kotler perpetrator, their and his description of the fact that Jones misidentification by as her assailant, though identifications of him the dream mirrored the owned a pair of jeans the victim, his her initial description were shaky at best — crime in several ways. that resembled those resemblance to a of the man did not they identified him In 1992, after three worn by the perpetrator, composite sketch of resemble Kotler. He after being hypnotized, years in prison and he was convicted. the perpetrator and a had spent over a and their identification seven years on bond, DNA testing ultimately serology test that decade in prison when was based in part DNA testing excluded proved Jones’s suggested he could be DNA testing led to his on smell. Fred Zain, Linscott as the innocence, and he the perpetrator, the exoneration. He was a fraudulent lab perpetrator. was exonerated jury convicted Callace later convicted of technician, provided in 1992. in one hour. In 1991, different charges on the TOO MANY WRevidence thatONG helped FULLY CONVICTEDCallace’s request for basis of DNA evidence. convict Woodall. Early DNA testing was TOO MANDNAY tests WR suggested ONGFULLY COgrantedNVI and showed CTED Woodall’s innocence that he did not commit and his conviction the rape. was vacated; further testing yielded the same results and he was exonerated. 12 years in prison — and a combined total of 2,475 years in prison. 200 www.innocenceproject.org | 3 TOO MANY WRONGFULLY CONVICTED WALTER SNYDER • 1993 KIRK BLOODSWORTH DWAYNE SCRUGGS • 1993 MARK DIAZ BRAVO • 1994 DALE BRISON • 1994 21993 00 .5 YEARS YEARS .5 YEARS YEARS .5 YEARS 6 VIRGINIA 8 MARYLAND 7 INDIANA 3 CALIFORNIA 3 PENNSYLVANIA Walter Snyder’s Kirk Bloodsworth was Dwayne Scruggs was Mark Diaz Bravo was Dale Brison was 2across-the-street0arrested0 for the rape convicted in 1986 a nurse at a Los Angeles arrested for rape and neighbor identified him and murder of a of rape and robbery hospital where a kidnapping in 1990 as the man who raped nine-year-old girl after and sentenced to 40 patient was raped in after the victim and robbed her in an anonymousT OcallerO MANyears inY prison WR basedONG1990.FULLY She implicated COidentifiedNVICTED him near her 1985. His mother was claimed to have seen on the victim’s Bravo, and although he apartment building. the only person who him with the victim. misidentification of had a strong alibi, he Brison’s request for could corroborate his Bloodsworth became him. The perpetrator was arrested. Serological DNA testing was alibi. Snyder served the first person who had tried to hide his testing revealed that denied at the time of TOsixO and MAN a half yearsY WRservedONG time on deathFULLYface during CO the NVIattack, CTEDthe perpetrator had a the trial. But several of a 45-year sentence row before being but the victim blood type shared by years later, the before he was proven exonerated by identified him in part only 3% of the Pennsylvania Supreme innocent through post-conviction DNA based on the shoes population —and Court ruled that the DNA testing. testing. Today, he is a he was wearing. In Bravo could not be evidence must be tested Program Officer for 1993, DNA testing excluded. Bravo’s if it was available. The Justice Project’s vindicated Scruggs. attorney said the The results proved that Campaign for Criminal prosecution refused Brison could not have Justice Reform and to allow DNA testing been the perpetrator. TOO MANY WRONGThe Justice ProjectFULLY CObeforNVIe the trial.
Recommended publications
  • Protecting the Innocent from False Confessions and Lost Confessions--And from Miranda Paul G
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 88 Article 2 Issue 2 Winter Winter 1998 Protecting the Innocent from False Confessions and Lost Confessions--And from Miranda Paul G. Cassell Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Paul G. Cassell, Protecting the Innocent from False Confessions and Lost Confessions--And from Miranda, 88 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 497 (Winter 1998) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/98/8802-0497 TI' JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW& CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 88, No. 2 Copyright 0 1998 by Northwestern Unh-rsity, School of Law PrinW in U.S.A PROTECTING THE INNOCENT FROM FALSE CONFESSIONS AND LOST CONFESSIONS-AND FROM MIRANDA PAUL G. CASSELL" For most of the last several decades, criminal procedure scholarship-mirroring the Warren Court landmarks it was commenting on-spent little time discussing the guiltless and much discussing the guilty. Recent scholarship suggests a dif- ferent focus is desirable. As one leading scholar recently put it, "the Constitution seeks to protect the innocent."' Professors Leo and Ofshe's preceding article,2 along with ar- ticles like it by (among others) Welsh White and Al Alschuler,4 commendably adopts this approach. Focusing on the plight of an innocent person who confessed to a crime he5 did not com- mit, they recommend certain changes in the rules governing po- " Professor of Law, University of Utah College of Law ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences of Failing to Admit Guilt at Parole Hearings Daniel S
    MEDWED_TRANSMITTED.DOC2 2/26/2008 1:51 PM The Innocent Prisoner’s Dilemma: Consequences of Failing to Admit Guilt at Parole Hearings Daniel S. Medwed∗ INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 493 I. THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF PAROLE ................................................ 497 A. HISTORICAL ORIGINS AND PURPOSES OF PAROLE ................................ 497 B. PAROLE RELEASE DECISION-MAKING: CONTEMPORARY STANDARDS AND POLICIES .................................................................................... 504 II. THE EFFECT OF PAROLE RELEASE DECISION-MAKING NORMS ON THE INNOCENT ............................................................................................... 513 A. PAROLE: AN INNOCENCE OPTION OF LAST RESORT ............................. 518 B. PRESSURE ON INNOCENT INMATES TO “ADMIT” GUILT ........................ 523 III. ADMISSIONS OF GUILT AND THE PAROLE RELEASE DECISION RECONSIDERED ....................................................................................... 529 A. THE DANGER OF ASSUMING THE LITIGATION PROCESS ACCURATELY FILTERS THE GUILTY FROM THE INNOCENT ......................................... 530 B. POTHOLES ON THE PATH TO REDEMPTION THROUGH THE PAROLE PROCESS ........................................................................................... 532 IV. SUGGESTIONS FOR REFORM .................................................................... 541 A. LIMITATIONS ON THE SUBSEQUENT USE OF STATEMENTS FROM PAROLE HEARINGS ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of the Presumption of Innocence
    Texas Law Review See Also Volume 94 Response The Myth of the Presumption of Innocence Brandon L. Garrett* I. Introduction Do we have a presumption of innocence in this country? Of course we do. After all, we instruct criminal juries on it, often during jury selection, and then at the outset of the case and during final instructions before deliberations. Take this example, delivered by a judge at a criminal trial in Illinois: "Under the law, the Defendant is presumed to be innocent of the charges against him. This presumption remains with the Defendant throughout the case and is not overcome until in your deliberations you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant is guilty."' Perhaps the presumption also reflects something more even, a larger commitment enshrined in a range of due process and other constitutional rulings designed to protect against wrongful convictions. The defense lawyer in the same trial quoted above said in his closings: [A]s [the defendant] sits here right now, he is presumed innocent of these charges. That is the corner stone of our system of justice. The best system in the world. That is a presumption that remains with him unless and until the State can prove him guilty beyond2 a reasonable doubt. That's the lynchpin in the system ofjustice. Our constitutional criminal procedure is animated by that commitment, * Justice Thurgood Marshall Distinguished Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law. 1. Transcript of Record at 13, People v. Gonzalez, No. 94 CF 1365 (Ill.Cir. Ct. June 12, 1995). 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Accepted Manuscript Version
    Research Archive Citation for published version: Kim Akass, and Janet McCabe, ‘HBO and the Aristocracy of Contemporary TV Culture: affiliations and legitimatising television culture, post-2007’, Mise au Point, Vol. 10, 2018. DOI: Link to published article in journal's website Document Version: This is the Accepted Manuscript version. The version in the University of Hertfordshire Research Archive may differ from the final published version. Copyright and Reuse: This manuscript version is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives License CC BY NC-ND 4.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. Enquiries If you believe this document infringes copyright, please contact Research & Scholarly Communications at [email protected] 1 HBO and the Aristocracy of TV Culture : affiliations and legitimatising television culture, post-2007 Kim Akass and Janet McCabe In its institutional pledge, as Jeff Bewkes, former-CEO of HBO put it, to ‘produce bold, really distinctive television’ (quoted in LaBarre 90), the premiere US, pay- TV cable company HBO has done more than most to define what ‘original programming’ might mean and look like in the contemporary TV age of international television flow, global media trends and filiations. In this article we will explore how HBO came to legitimatise a contemporary television culture through producing distinct divisions ad infinitum, framed as being rooted outside mainstream commercial television production. In creating incessant divisions in genre, authorship and aesthetics, HBO incorporates artistic norms and principles of evaluation and puts them into circulation as a succession of oppositions— oppositions that we will explore throughout this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Bite Mark Exonerations
    DESCRIPTION OF BITE MARK EXONERATIONS 1. Keith Allen Harward: Keith Harward was convicted of the September 1982 murder of a man and the rape of his wife. The assailant, who was dressed as a sailor, bit the rape victim’s legs multiple times during the commission of the rape. Because of the assailant’s uniform, the investigation focused on the sailors aboard a Navy ship dry-docked near the victims’ Newport News, Virginia, home. Dentists aboard the ship ran visual screens of the dental records and teeth of between 1,000 and 3,000 officers aboard the ship; though Harward’s dentition was initially highlighted for additional screening, a forensic dentist later excluded Harward as the source of the bites. The crime went unsolved for six months, until detectives were notified that Harward was accused of biting his then-girlfriend in a dispute. The Commonwealth then re-submitted wax impressions and dental molds of Harward's dentition to two ABFO board-certified Diplomates, Drs. Lowell Levine and Alvin Kagey, who both concluded that Harward was the source of bite marks on the rape victim. Although the naval and local dentists who conducted the initial screenings had excluded Harward as the source of the bites, in the wake of the ABFO Diplomates’ identifications they both changed their opinions. Harward’s defense attorneys also sought opinions from two additional forensic dentists prior to his trials, but those experts also concluded that Harward inflicted the bites; in total, six forensic dentists falsely identified Harward as the biter. At Harward's second trial, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE May 2016 Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network Laura Osur Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Osur, Laura, "Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network" (2016). Dissertations - ALL. 448. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/448 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract When Netflix launched in April 1998, Internet video was in its infancy. Eighteen years later, Netflix has developed into the first truly global Internet TV network. Many books have been written about the five broadcast networks – NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, and the CW – and many about the major cable networks – HBO, CNN, MTV, Nickelodeon, just to name a few – and this is the fitting time to undertake a detailed analysis of how Netflix, as the preeminent Internet TV networks, has come to be. This book, then, combines historical, industrial, and textual analysis to investigate, contextualize, and historicize Netflix's development as an Internet TV network. The book is split into four chapters. The first explores the ways in which Netflix's development during its early years a DVD-by-mail company – 1998-2007, a period I am calling "Netflix as Rental Company" – lay the foundations for the company's future iterations and successes. During this period, Netflix adapted DVD distribution to the Internet, revolutionizing the way viewers receive, watch, and choose content, and built a brand reputation on consumer-centric innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • NAME E-Book 2012
    THE HISTORY OF THE NAME National Association of Medical Examiners Past Presidents History eBook 2012 EDITION Published by the Past Presidents Committee on the Occasion of the 46th Annual Meeting at Baltimore, Maryland Preface to the 2012 NAME History eBook The Past Presidents Committee has been continuing its effort of compiling the NAME history for the occasion of the 2016 NAME Meeting’s 50th Golden Anniversa- ry Meeting. The Committee began collecting historical materials and now solicits the histories of individual NAME Members in the format of a guided autobiography, i.e. memoir. Seventeen past presidents have already contributed their memoirs, which were publish in a eBook in 2011. We continued the same guided autobiography format for compiling historical ma- terial, and now have additional memoirs to add also. This year, the book will be combined with the 2011 material, and some previous chapters have been updated. The project is now extended to all the NAME members, who wish to contribute their memoirs. The standard procedure is also to submit your portrait with your historical/ memoir material. Some of the memoirs are very short, and contains a minimum information, however the editorial team decided to include it in the 2012 edition, since it can be updated at any time. The 2012 edition Section I – Memoir Series Section II - ME History Series – individual medical examiner or state wide system history Presented in an alphabetic order of the name state Section III – Dedication Series - NAME member written material dedicating anoth- er member’s contributions and pioneer work, or newspaper articles on or dedicated to a NAME member Plan for 2013 edition The Committee is planning to solicit material for the chapters dedicated to specifi- cally designated subjects, such as Women in the NAME, Standard, Inspection and Accreditation Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Interrogations and Confessions
    CHAPTER 16 INTERROGATIONS AND CONFESSIONS Did the police constitutionally obtain the defendant’s confession to murder? Dr. Jeffrey Metzner, a psychiatrist employed by the state hospital, testified that respondent was suffering from chronic schizophrenia and was in a psychotic state at least as of August 17, 1983, the day before he confessed. Metzner’s interviewsdistribute with respondent revealed that respondent was following the “voice of God.” This voice instructed respondent to withdraw money from the bank, to buy an airplane ticket, and to fly from Boston to Denver. When respondent arrived from Boston, God’s voice became stronger and told respondent either to confess to the killing or to commit suicide. Reluctantly following the command of the voices, respondent approached Officeror [Patrick] Anderson and confessed. Dr. Metzner testified that, in his expert opinion, respondent was experiencing “command hallucinations.” This condition interfered with respondent’s “volitional abilities; that is, his ability to make free and rational choices.” (Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 [1986]) CHAPTER OUTLINE post, Introduction Case Analysis Due Process Chapter Summary The Right Against Self-Incrimination Chapter Review Questions Miranda v. Arizona copy, Legal Terminology Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel: Police Interrogations not DoTEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE 1. Do you know the role of confessions in the criminal investigation process, the potential challenges and problems presented by confessions, and the explanations for false confessions? 2. Are you able to discuss the protections provided by the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and what is protected by the Fifth Amendment and what is not protected? 3. Can you explain how Miranda v.
    [Show full text]
  • View Entire Issue As
    Volume 15 Issue 14 September 11 - 24, 2008 The Milwau ee LGBT Film/Video Festival Final Days • Complete Guide Inside iR i t Orf LIM nI ' i FALL ARTS PREVIEW WRAP UP LOGO Star Jennie McNulty Shines Bright in Superior Plus lots more in entertainment inside! WHY BE SHY? GET TESTED for HIV, at BESTD Clinic. It's free and it's fast, with no names and no needles.We also provide free STD testing, exams, and treatment. Staffed totally by volunteers and supported by donations, BESTD has been doing HIV outreach since 1987. We're open: Mondays 6 PM-8:30 PM: Free HIV & STD testing Tuesdays 6 PM-8:30 PM: All of the above plus STD exams and treatment Some services only available for men; visit our web site for details. BESTD cum(' Brady East STD Clinic 1240 E. Brady Street Milwaukee, WI 53202 414-272-2144 www.bestd.org DIES "Legal couple status may support a relationship," LESBIAN RIGHTS PIONEER DEL MARTIN researcher Robert-Jay Green said in a statement an- Lesbian Rights Pioneer Del Mar- things. nouncing the findings. tin Dies "I also never imagined there Surprise! Log Cabin Republicans Endorse Mc- San Francisco - Just two months would be a day that we would ac- Cain-Palhi Ticket: The Log Cabin Republicans after achieving a life-long dream, tually be able to get married," Lyon (LCR), who refused to endorse George W. Bush for the legal marriage to her partner of wrote. "I am devastated, but I take reelection in 2004, announced their endorsement of 55 years, lesbian rights pioneer Del some solace in knowing we were Senator John McCain for President of the United Martin - whose trailblazing activism able to enjoy the ultimate rite of States on September 2: LCR's board of directors spanned more than a half century - love and commitment before she voted 12-2 to endorse both McCain and Alaska Gov- died August 27 at a local hospice.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Constitutional Rights & Innocence Project Brief
    Case 19-3956, Document 172, 12/17/2020, 2996027, Page1 of 36 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT No. 19-3956 & 20-2427 OUSMAN DARBOE, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of a Final Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, No. A 201 119 754 BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE OF THE CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND THE INNOCENCE PROJECT, INC. IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A FINAL DECISION OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS [Counsel names and addresses appear on following page] Case 19-3956, Document 172, 12/17/2020, 2996027, Page2 of 36 Darius Charney Baher Azmy Center for Constitutional Rights 666 Broadway, 7th Floor New York, NY 10012 (212) 614-6475 [email protected] M. Chris Fabricant THE INNOCENCE PROJECT, INC. 40 Worth Street, Suite 701 New York, NY 10013 (212) 364-5340 [email protected] ii Case 19-3956, Document 172, 12/17/2020, 2996027, Page3 of 36 Table of Contents Table of Authorities ........................................................................................ v CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ............................................. ix STATEMENT OF INTEREST ....................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ...................................................................... 3 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................. 4 I. THE NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT (“NYPD”) HAS A HISTORY AND PRACTICE OF RACIAL PROFILING AND SUSPICIONLESS STOPS AND FRISKS ............................ 5 A. NYPD’s Stop-and-Frisk Practices Were Found to be Racially Discriminatory and Unconstitutional ........................... 8 B. The NYPD’s Unconstitutional Implementation of Stop and Frisk Was Particularly Egregious in the Bronx ................. 10 C. Arrests Arising from Terry Stops Are at Best Questionable Indicators of Actual Criminal Wrongdoing ............................. 13 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Confessions, Convictions and Controversy: an Examination of False Confessions Leading to Wrongful Convictions in the United States Throughout History
    165 Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity Volume 9 – May 2020 CONFESSIONS, CONVICTIONS AND CONTROVERSY: AN EXAMINATION OF FALSE CONFESSIONS LEADING TO WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES THROUGHOUT HISTORY Kirandeep Kaur* I. INTRODUCTION American history is unfortunately replete with hundreds, if not thousands, of instances of false confessions.1 Due to our error prone systems in place, the likelihood of the police obtaining false confessions from otherwise innocent people for crimes they did not commit is not as small as one might believe.2 These false confessions then turn into wrongful convictions, resulting in a win for the law enforcement and prosecutors by way of a closed case, yet a loss of liberty and freedom of the accused.3 Unfortunately, this issue carries ramifications that go beyond an innocent person who will be quickly forgotten and left in jail serving a sentence.4 The real perpetrators live free within society to commit the same crime over and over until they are caught; that is, if they are caught.5 The retributive justice of the incarceration system goes unfulfilled, as society erroneously believes they have avenged the crime, while the real perpetrator roams free.6 Equally important, rehabilitation of the perpetrator is not achieved as their behavior remains unaltered. Further, utilitarian justifications for our criminal system also go unfulfilled as there are absolutely no benefits to society when erroneously convicting. There is no deterrence or reform as the * Kirandeep Kaur is a Juris Doctor Candidate for May 2021 at Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center. 1 Richard A. Leo, False Confessions: Causes, Consequences and Implications, in Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, AAPL (Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • 22 Innovation Cases
    22 INNOVATION CASES in Micro, Small, Medium and Large-sized Enterprises 22 INNOVATION CASES in Micro, Small, Medium and Large-sized Enterprises CNI – National Confederation of Industry Brazil Robson Braga de Andrade President SESI – Social Service of Industry Robson Braga de Andrade Director SENAI – National Service of Industrial Training Rafael Esmeraldo Lucchesi Ramacciotti General-Director SEBRAE – Brazilian Micro and Small Business Support Service Guilherme Afif Domingos President 22 INNOVATION CASES in Micro, Small, Medium and Large-sized Enterprises Brasília 2017 © 2017. CNI – National Confederation of Industry. © 2017. SESI – Social Service of Industry. © 2017. SENAI – National Service of Industrial Training. © 2017. SEBRAE – Brazilian Micro and Small Business Support Service. Any part of this publication may be reproduced, provided the source is cited. CNI Innovation Board – DI SEBRAE Technical Board – DITEC CATALOGING IN PUBLICATION DATA C748i National Confederation of Industry. Innovate to add value. 22 innovation cases in micro, small, medium and large-sized enterprises / National Confederation of Industry, Social Service for Industry, National Service of Industrial Learning, Brazilian Service of Support to Micro and Small-Sized Enterprises. Brasília: CNI, 2017. 272p. : il. 1.Innovation. 2. Micro, small, medium, and large-sized enterprises. I. Title. CDU: 347.77 CNI SEBRAE National Confederation of Industry Brazilian Micro and Small Business Support Service Headquarters Setor Bancário Norte Headquarters Quadra 1 – Bloco C SGAS
    [Show full text]