DOCSLIB.ORG

Military Commissions in Light of the Supreme Court Decision in Hamdan V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Military Commissions in Light of the Supreme Court Decision in Hamdan V S. HRG. 109–881 MILITARY COMMISSIONS IN LIGHT OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IN HAMDAN V. RUMSFELD HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JULY 13, 19; AUGUST 2, 2006 Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 35–144 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 16:04 May 08, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\35144.TXT SARMSER2 PsN: JUNEB COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES JOHN WARNER, Virginia, Chairman JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona CARL LEVIN, Michigan JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts PAT ROBERTS, Kansas ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine JACK REED, Rhode Island JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii JAMES M. TALENT, Missouri BILL NELSON, Florida SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia E. BENJAMIN NELSON, Nebraska LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina MARK DAYTON, Minnesota ELIZABETH DOLE, North Carolina EVAN BAYH, Indiana JOHN CORNYN, Texas HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, New York JOHN THUNE, South Dakota CHARLES S. ABELL, Staff Director RICHARD D. DEBOBES, Democratic Staff Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 16:04 May 08, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 C:\DOCS\35144.TXT SARMSER2 PsN: JUNEB C O N T E N T S CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF WITNESSES MILITARY COMMISSIONS IN LIGHT OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IN HAMDAN V. RUMSFELD JULY 13, 2006 Page Black, MG Scott C., USA, The Judge Advocate General of the Army ................ 7 McPherson, RADM James E., USN, Judge Advocate General of the Navy ........ 8 Rives, Maj. Gen. Jack L., USAF, The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force ...................................................................................................................... 8 Sandkulher, Brig. Gen. Kevin M., USMC, Staff Judge Advocate to the Com- mandant of the Marine Corps ............................................................................. 8 Romig, MG Thomas J., USA (Ret.), Former Judge Advocate General of the Army ...................................................................................................................... 8 Hutson, RADM John D., USN (Ret.), Former Judge Advocate General of the Navy ................................................................................................................ 9 CONTINUE TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON MILITARY COMMISSIONS IN LIGHT OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IN HAMDAN V. RUMSFELD JULY 19, 2006 Massimino, Elisa C., Director, Washington Office, Human Rights First ............ 104 Bierman, Katherine Newell, Counterterrorism Counsel, U.S. Program, Human Rights Watch .......................................................................................... 122 Fidell, Eugene R., President, National Institute of Military Justice .................. 133 Mernin, Michael, Chair, Committee on Military Affairs and Justice, The Association of the Bar of the City of New York ................................................. 164 Carafano, James J., Senior Research Fellow, The Heritage Foundation ............ 213 Katyal, Neal K., Professor of Law, Georgetown University ................................. 231 Schlueter, David A., Hardy Professor of Law and Director of Advocacy Pro- grams, St. Mary’s University .............................................................................. 249 Silliman, Scott L., Professor of the Practice of Law and Executive Director, Center on Law, Ethics, and National Security, Duke University .................... 260 CONTINUE TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON THE FUTURE OF MILITARY COMMISSIONS IN LIGHT OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IN HAMDAN V. RUMSFELD AUGUST 2, 2006 Gonzales, Hon. Alberto R., Attorney General of the United States .................... 316 England, Hon. Gordon R., Deputy Secretary of Defense ...................................... 322 (III) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 16:04 May 08, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 C:\DOCS\35144.TXT SARMSER2 PsN: JUNEB VerDate 0ct 09 2002 16:04 May 08, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 C:\DOCS\35144.TXT SARMSER2 PsN: JUNEB MILITARY COMMISSIONS IN LIGHT OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IN HAMDAN V. RUMSFELD THURSDAY, JULY 13, 2006 U.S. SENATE, COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES, Washington, DC. The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:02 a.m. in room SH–216, Hart Senate Office Building, Senator John Warner (chair- man) presiding. Committee members present: Senators Warner, McCain, Inhofe, Roberts, Sessions, Collins, Talent, Chambliss, Graham, Cornyn, Thune, Levin, Kennedy, Byrd, Lieberman, Reed, Bill Nelson, E. Benjamin Nelson, Dayton, Bayh, and Clinton. Committee staff members present: Charles S. Abell, staff direc- tor; and Leah C. Brewer, nominations and hearings clerk. Majority staff members present: William M. Caniano, profes- sional staff member; Regina A. Dubey, professional staff member; Ambrose R. Hock, professional staff member; Derek J. Maurer, pro- fessional staff member; David M. Morriss, counsel; and Scott W. Stucky, general counsel. Minority staff members present: Richard D. DeBobes, Democratic staff director; Michael J. Kuiken, professional staff member; Peter K. Levine, minority counsel; William G.P. Monahan, minority coun- sel; and Michael J. Noblet, staff assistant. Staff assistants present: Jessica L. Kingston, Benjamin L. Rubin, and Pendred K. Wilson. Committee members’ assistants present: Ann Loomis, assistant to Senator Warner; Pablo Chavez, Christopher J. Paul, and Rich- ard H. Fontaine, Jr., assistants to Senator McCain; John A. Bonsell and Jeremy Shull, assistants to Senator Inhofe; Chris Arnold, as- sistant to Senator Roberts; Mackenzie M. Eaglen, assistant to Sen- ator Collins; Clyde A. Taylor IV, assistant to Senator Chambliss; Matthew R. Rimkunas, assistant to Senator Graham; Russell J. Thomasson, assistant to Senator Cornyn; Stuart C. Mallory, assist- ant to Senator Thune; Mieke Y. Eoyang and Joseph Axelrad, assist- ants to Senator Kennedy; Christina Evans and Erik Raven, assist- ants to Senator Byrd; Frederick M. Downey, assistant to Senator Lieberman; Elizabeth King, assistant to Senator Reed; William K. Sutey, assistant to Senator Bill Nelson; Eric Pierce, assistant to Senator Ben Nelson; Luke Ballman, assistant to Senator Dayton; Todd Rosenblum, assistant to Senator Bayh; and Andrew Shapiro, assistant to Senator Clinton. (1) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 16:04 May 08, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 C:\DOCS\35144.TXT SARMSER2 PsN: JUNEB 2 OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR JOHN WARNER, CHAIRMAN Chairman WARNER. Subsequent to the Supreme Court decision, I was approached by a number of people who inquired as to my opinion with regard to the gravity of this situation. I said, this piece of legislation which Congress is now tasked to provide could be one of the landmark pieces of legislation, certainly in the 28 years that I’ve been privileged to be in the United States Senate. Given that we started a little late this morning—we had to do that to accommodate some of our colleagues on the Judiciary Com- mittee—I will not, in an opening statement, try to go back over the history of how the administration, and, indeed, this country, have tried to deal with this very complex and, really, unprecedented sit- uation regarding detainees. Most, if not all, have no real state alle- giance, and were not in a state-sponsored type of conflict. I will just assume that everyone before us here on this panel, and, indeed, my colleagues, are well aware of that. Therefore, I also will not try and get into any dissertation about the Supreme Court decision. We’ve all studied that. I’ll simply say that we, in my judg- ment, as a Congress, in this legislation, must meet the tenets and objectives of that opinion; otherwise, such legislation that we will devise and enact into law might well be struck down by subsequent Federal Court review, and that would not be in the interests of this Nation. The eyes of the world are on this Nation as to how we in- tend to handle this type of situation, and handle it in a way that a measure of legal rights and human rights are given to detainees. I say ‘‘a measure,’’ because I’m not prepared, this morning, to say what would be the parameters in that situation. Like several other members of this committee, I’ve been in consultation with the ad- ministration, and it was made very clear to me by the National Se- curity Advisor, Mr. Hadley, and Ms. Miers, Counsel to the Presi- dent, that they were working the issue, that there were some hon- est difference of opinion as to approach within the administration— that’s quite understandable; it’s the way it should be—but that they would reconcile those positions and advise Congress shortly after the President returns from the G8 conference. Given that there have been two hearings at which witnesses have appeared and have stated rather finite parameters, I do not believe that we, Congress, have received the last word, by any means, as to where and how the administration would like to see this legislation proceed. With that in mind, I’d just caution my colleagues—let us be most respectful of the fact that we will work in partnership with the ad- ministration, but the burden rests on Congress to enact this law. It’s my understanding—and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2008 Annual Report
    5 YEARS OF EXCELLENCE FEATURED ARTICLES AND THE 2008 ANNUAL REPORT Benjamin Franklin’s Shoe PAGE 4 A Road Rich with Milestones PAGE 10 Today and Tomorrow: 2008 Annual Report PAGE 16 2008 Financials PAGE 22 FEATUREMAILBOX ONE 2 NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER 5 Years of Excellence LETTER FROM THE EDITORS Dear Friends: Exceptional. That is the only word that can fully describe the remarkable strides the National Constitution Center has made in the past five years. Since opening its doors on July 4, 2003, it has developed into one of the most esteemed institutions for the ongoing study, discussion and celebration of the United States’ most cherished document. We’re pleased to present a celebration of the Center’s first five years and the 2008 Annual Report. In the following pages you will read about the Center’s earliest days and the milestones it has experienced. You will learn about the moving exhibitions it has developed and presented over the years. You will look back at the many robust public conversations led by national figures that have occurred on site, and you will be introduced to a new and innovative international initiative destined to carry the Center boldly into the future. It has been a true pleasure to work for this venerable institution, informing and inspiring We the People. We both look forward to witnessing the Center’s future achievements and we are honored that the next chapter of this story will be written by the Center’s new Chairman, President Bill Clinton. Sincerely, President George H. W. Bush Joseph M.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Proposals to Limit Guantanamo Detainees’ Access to Habeas Corpus Review
    S. HRG. 109–658 EXAMINING PROPOSALS TO LIMIT GUANTANAMO DETAINEES’ ACCESS TO HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 25, 2006 Serial No. J–109–113 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 30–633 PDF WASHINGTON : 2006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:33 Nov 09, 2006 Jkt 030633 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\30633.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania, Chairman ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts JON KYL, Arizona JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware MIKE DEWINE, Ohio HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JOHN CORNYN, Texas CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois TOM COBURN, Oklahoma MICHAEL O’NEILL, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Democratic Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:33 Nov 09, 2006 Jkt 030633 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\30633.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Cornyn, Hon. John, a U.S. Senator from the State of Texas ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Plans and Authorizations to Violate International Law Concerning Treatment and Interrogation of Detainees
    PAUST PRINT VERSION.DOC 05/20/05 7:29 PM Executive Plans and Authorizations to Violate International Law Concerning Treatment and Interrogation of Detainees JORDAN J. PAUST* Not since the Nazi era have so many lawyers been so clearly involved in international crimes concerning the treatment and interrogation of persons detained during war. This Article provides detailed exposition of the types of improprieties abetted by previously secret memos and letters of various lawyers and others within the Bush Administration. The Article demonstrates why several of the claims in such memos were in serious error; what type of illegal orders and authorizations were actually given by the President, the Secretary of Defense, and various military commanders at Guantanamo and in Iraq; what type of other authorizations in support of a common plan to violate the Geneva Conventions and human rights law existed; and what type of illegal interrogation tactics were approved and used at Guantanamo, in Afghanistan, in Iraq, and apparently elsewhere by U.S. military personnel, civilians, and the CIA. The Article also provides detailed attention to various laws of war and human rights relevant to interrogation and treatment of detained persons; why relevant rights and duties are absolute and remain so regardless of claims by the President and others to deny full coverage to alleged terrorists and enemy combatants; why there can be leader responsibility for dereliction of duty in addition to responsibility of perpetrators, aiders and abettors, and those who issued illegal orders; and why the President and all within the executive branch are * Law Foundation Professor, University of Houston.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Back to Go Forward: Remaking Detainee Policy*
    Looking Back to Go Forward: Remaking U.S. Detainee Policy* by James M. Durant, III, Lt Col USAF Deputy Head, Department of Law United States Air Force Academy Frank Anechiarico Distinguished Visiting Professor of Law United States Air Force Academy Maynard-Knox Professor of Government and Law Hamilton College [WEB VERSION] April, 2009 © James Durant, III, Frank Anechiarico * This article does not reflect the views of the Air Force, the United States Department of Defense, or the United States Government. “By mid-1966 the U.S. government had begun to fear for the welfare of American pilots and other prisoners held in Hanoi. Captured in the midst of an undeclared war, these men were labeled war criminals. .Anxious to make certain that they were covered by the Geneva Conventions and not tortured into making ‘confessions’ or brought to trial and executed, U.S. Ambassador-at-Large Averell Harriman asked [ New Yorker correspondent Robert] Shaplen to contact the North Vietnamese.” - Thomas Bass (2009) ++ Introduction This article, first explains why and how detainee policy as applied to those labeled enemy combatants, collapsed and failed by 2008. Second, we argue that the most direct and effective way for the Obama Administration to reassert the rule of law and protect national security in the treatment of detainees is to direct review and prosecution of detainee cases to U.S. Attorneys and adjudication of charges against them to the federal courts. The immediate relevance of this topic is raised by the decision of the Obama Administration to use the federal courts to try Ali Saleh Kahah al-Marri in a (civilian) criminal court.
    [Show full text]
  • H.Report 109-664, PART 2
    109TH CONGRESS " ! REPT. 109–664 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Part 2 MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT OF 2006 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 6054 together with DISSENTING VIEWS SEPTEMBER 25, 2006.—Ordered to be printed. VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:25 Sep 26, 2006 Jkt 049006 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6012 Sfmt 6012 E:\HR\OC\HR664P2.XXX HR664P2 cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with HEARING E:\Seals\Congress.#13 MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT OF 2006 VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:25 Sep 26, 2006 Jkt 049006 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\HR\OC\HR664P2.XXX HR664P2 cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with HEARING 109TH CONGRESS REPT. 109–664 " ! 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Part 2 MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT OF 2006 SEPTEMBER 25, 2006.—Ordered to be printed Mr. SENSENBRENNER, from the Committee on the Judiciary, submitted the following R E P O R T together with DISSENTING VIEWS [To accompany H.R. 6054] [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] The Committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 6054) to amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize trial by military commission for violations of the law of war, and for other purposes, having considered the same, report favorably thereon with amendments and recommend that the bill as amend­ ed do pass. The amendments (stated in terms of the page and line numbers of the introduced bill) are as follows: Page 4, after line 18, insert the following new paragraph (and re­ designate the succeeding paragraphs accordingly): ‘‘(2)
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE September 28, 2006 a Moment, Against Public Opinion, to MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT of Senator from Texas, Mr
    S10354 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE September 28, 2006 a moment, against public opinion, to MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT OF Senator from Texas, Mr. CORNYN, in set the gold standard and set us apart. 2006 the unanimous consent agreement to We have been known as the nation of The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under be recognized as one of the wrap-up Nuremberg. My fear is now we will be the previous order, the Senate will re­ speakers on those in opposition to the known as the nation of Guantanamo, sume consideration of S. 3930, which amendment. I yield the floor. and I worry about that. the clerk will report. Mr. WARNER. We have our dif­ The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen­ The assistant legislative clerk read ator from Arizona is recognized. ferences, if I may say, but that was a as follows: war of state-sponsored nations and ag­ Mr. KYL. Madam President, yester­ A bill (S. 3930) to authorize trial by mili­ day Senator SPECTER argued that one gressions, men wearing uniforms, men tary commission for violations of the law of acting at the direction of recognized sentence in the Hamdi opinion that re­ war, and for other purposes. fers to habeas corpus rights as applying governments. Today’s war is a dis­ Pending: parate bunch of terrorists, coming to all ‘‘individuals’’ inside the United Specter amendment No. 5087, to strike the overnight, no uniforms, no principles, States indicates that alien enemy com­ provision regarding habeas review. batants have constitutional habeas guided by nothing. We are doing the rights when they are held inside this best we can as a nation, under the di­ The PRESIDING OFFICER.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecuting Crimes Committed by American Military Contractors in Iraq Christopher D
    Penn State International Law Review Volume 27 Article 6 Number 1 Penn State International Law Review 6-1-2008 Reining in Rambo: Prosecuting Crimes Committed by American Military Contractors in Iraq Christopher D. Belen Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr Part of the International Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Belen, Christopher D. (2008) "Reining in Rambo: Prosecuting Crimes Committed by American Military Contractors in Iraq," Penn State International Law Review: Vol. 27: No. 1, Article 6. Available at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr/vol27/iss1/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Penn State International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Comments I Reining in Rambo: Prosecuting Crimes Committed by American Military Contractors in Iraq Christopher D. Belen* I. INTRODUCTION On September 16, 2007, American civilians shot and killed seventeen Iraqi civilians on a Baghdad street.' The heavily armed Americans were not tourists or ordinary criminals; they were employed by Blackwater USA, a State Department contractor, and paid to protect the United States Embassy and diplomatic corps in Baghdad.2 Although the reports and investigations consistently concluded the shooting was at least excessive, 3 the possible criminal liability of the individual shooters * J.D. Candidate, 2009, The Dickinson School of Law of the Pennsylvania State University. I thank my wife, Erika, for her steadfast patience and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide and the Rule of Law Hearing Committee on The
    S. HRG. 110–46 GENOCIDE AND THE RULE OF LAW HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE LAW OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION FEBRUARY 5, 2007 Serial No. J–110–9 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 35–763 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:28 Jun 08, 2007 Jkt 035763 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\35763.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont, Chairman EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JON KYL, Arizona RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois JOHN CORNYN, Texas BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island TOM COBURN, Oklahoma BRUCE A. COHEN, Chief Counsel and Staff Director MICHAEL O’NEILL, Republican Chief Counsel and Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE LAW RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois, Chairman EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts TOM COBURN, Oklahoma JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware JON KYL, Arizona RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland JOHN CORNYN, Texas SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JOSEPH ZOGBY, Chief Counsel MARY HARNED, Republican Chief Counsel (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:28 Jun 08, 2007 Jkt 035763 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\35763.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Cardin, Benjamin L., a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Proposals to Limit Guantanamo Detainees' Access To
    S. HRG. 109–658 EXAMINING PROPOSALS TO LIMIT GUANTANAMO DETAINEES’ ACCESS TO HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 25, 2006 Serial No. J–109–113 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 30–633 PDF WASHINGTON : 2006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:33 Nov 09, 2006 Jkt 030633 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\30633.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania, Chairman ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts JON KYL, Arizona JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware MIKE DEWINE, Ohio HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JOHN CORNYN, Texas CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois TOM COBURN, Oklahoma MICHAEL O’NEILL, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Democratic Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:33 Nov 09, 2006 Jkt 030633 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\30633.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Cornyn, Hon. John, a U.S. Senator from the State of Texas ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Combatant Status: It Is Time for Intermediate Levels of Recognition for Partial Compliance Eric Talbot Jensen BYU Law, [email protected]
    Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Faculty Scholarship 12-31-2005 Combatant Status: It Is Time for Intermediate Levels of Recognition for Partial Compliance Eric Talbot Jensen BYU Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Eric Talbot Jensen, ????????? ??????: ?? ?? ???? ??? ???????????? ?????? ?? ??????????? ??? ??????? ??????????, 46 Vᴀ. J. Iɴᴛ'ʟ L. 209 (2005). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Combatant Status: It Is Time for Intermediate Levels of Recognition for Partial Compliance ERIc TALBOT JENSEN* I. History of Combatant Status ..................................................... 214 II. Combatant Status under Current International Law ................. 218 A. Analysis of Article 4 of the GPW ................................... 220 B. Protections for Noncombatants ....................................... 224 C . G PI A rgum ents ............................................................... 226 III. Evolve the Law to Allow Intermediate Levels of Recognition for Partial Compliance ......................................... 232 IV . Specific Provisions ................................................................... 235 A. Immunity from Speech
    [Show full text]
  • TELEVISION NEWS and the VISUAL FRAMING of WAR By
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ETD - Electronic Theses & Dissertations PRIME TIME POLITICS: TELEVISION NEWS AND THE VISUAL FRAMING OF WAR By Jennifer Ogg Anderson Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Political Science May, 2011 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Professor John G. Geer Professor Cindy D. Kam Professor Marc J. Hetherington Professor Bruce I. Oppenheimer Professor Vanessa Beasley Copyright © 2011 by Jennifer Ogg Anderson All Rights Reserved To Kevin, with a multitude of thanks for your love, patience and steadfast support iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the financial support of the Vanderbilt Political Science Department and a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant from the National Science Foundation. I am also grateful to the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions for a summer fellowship that provided me with focused time to devote to this work, and to the Research on Individuals, Politics and Society lab of the Vanderbilt political science department for allowing me to conduct my own research study. I am indebted to everyone who has provided support throughout the duration of this project. I am especially grateful to the co-chairs of my dissertation committee. I would like to thank Dr. John Geer for his excellent advice, patience and belief in this project from its inception. The dissertation would not have come to fruition without his leadership, and his professional and personal guidance taught me so much about political science research and life in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S14147
    November 8, 2007 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14147 great sacrifices in our country’s name What that means is we can’t raise a The majority leader. so that we might continue to be the point of order against those earmarks Mr. REID. Mr. President, I appreciate land of the free and the home of the to strike them out of the bill. the cooperation of everyone. This has brave. Let me give me you some perspective been a difficult day. These are very We are faced tonight with a vote on on what we are talking about. The De- sensitive issues we are dealing with, a bill that our troops need, but the fense appropriations conference text with the troops and the financing of troops are not the focus of this con- was 133 pages long. The Joint Expla- the country, in addition to the nomina- ference report. This political tactic nation of Managers—470 pages long. tion of a Cabinet officer. It is a time does our troops and all Americans who The JES as they call it, contains all of when you need cooperation from both want good government, a disservice. the earmarks, all kinds of substantive sides. That is what we have had. It has I want to provide our troops with the direction and is three times as long as not been easy. I extend my apprecia- funding and the resources they need to the official conference report, and it is tion to my colleagues on the other side be successful in all their objectives. I not subject to a point of order? This is of the aisle and the cooperation of my want the Senate to consider the Fiscal wrong.
    [Show full text]