Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Water Resources Division Fort Collins, Colorado Assessment of Coastal Water Resources And Watershed Conditions at Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2006/361 Cover photos: Upper left, Arch at Chapel Rock Upper right, AuSable Lighthouse Lower left, Chapel Creek Lower right, Legion Lake Bog Photographs by Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2006/361 Christine Mechenich Center for Watershed Science and Education College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin –Stevens Point Stevens Point, WI 54481 George J. Kraft Center for Watershed Science and Education College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin –Stevens Point Stevens Point, WI 54481 Stanley W. Szczytko Center for Watershed Science and Education College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin –Stevens Point Stevens Point, WI 54481 David J. Mechenich Center for Watershed Science and Education College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin –Stevens Point Stevens Point, WI 54481 This report was prepared under Task Order J238005086 of the Great Lakes Northern Forest Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit (agreement H6000C02000). U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Water Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center 1201 Oak Ridge Dr. Fort Collins, CO 80525 The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the man- agement of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed re- sults of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advance- ment of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports pro- vide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientific literature reviews; and peer re- viewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia. Views and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect policies of the National Park Service. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Printed copies of reports in these series may be produced in a limited quantity and they are only available as long as the supply lasts. This report is also available from the Natural Re- source Publications Management Web site (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/NRPM) on the Internet, or by sending a request to the address on the back cover. Mechenich, C., G.J. Kraft, S.W. Szczytko, D.J. Mechenich. 2006. Assessment of Coastal Wa- ter Resources and Watershed Conditions at Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, Wisconsin. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR—2006/361. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS D-124, December 2006 Contents Figures 7 Acknowledgements 10 Commonly Used Abbreviations 10 Executive Summary 12 Introduction and Park Description 15 Size, Boundaries, Location, Climate, and Regional Setting 15 Key Features 15 Land Use and Vegetative Cover 20 Historic and Current Human Uses 21 Geology and Soils 24 General Hydrology and Water Budget 31 Water Resources of Lake Superior 34 Physical Characteristics 34 Biological Resources 35 Water Resources of Inland Waters 40 Physical and Chemical Characteristics 40 Biological Resources 44 Watersheds and Limnological Characteristics 47 Assessment of Park Water Resources 58 Sources of Pollutants 58 Surface Water Quality 72 Groundwater Quality, Quantity, and Use 82 Other Areas of Concern 87 Conclusions 96 Open Waters of Lake Superior 96 Inland Lakes 96 Streams 96 Recommendations and Rationale 99 Works Cited 102 Personal Communications 116 Appendices 118 Figures Figure 1. Location of Pictured Rocks National Figure 19. Shoreline sensitivity to spills classifica- Lakeshore in the Upper Great Lakes region of tions for Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore. the United States. 16 66 Figure 2. Land ownership in the shoreline zone Figure 20. Locations of on-site waste disposal and IBZ, Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore. systems and vault toilets operated by Pictured 17 Rocks National Lakeshore. 70 Figure 3. Land management and ownership in Figure 21. Total nitrogen for most recent sam- the Pictured Rocks area. 18 pling dates for waterbodies in the Pictured Rocks area. 77 Figure 4. Key features and water resources of Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore. 19 Figure 22. Total phosphorus for most recent sam- pling dates for waterbodies in the Pictured Rocks Figure 5. Vegetative cover map for Pictured area. 78 Rocks National Lakeshore. 22 Figure 23. Alkalinity for most recent sampling Figure 6. IFMAP land cover for the Pictured dates for waterbodies in the Pictured Rocks area. Rocks area. 23 80 Figure 7. Municipal boundaries in the Pictured Figure 24. Exceedences of aquatic life and hu- Rocks area. 25 man health criteria in Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore. 81 Figure 8. Bedrock geology of the Pictured Rocks area. 26 Figure 25. Water supply wells in and near Pic- tured Rocks National Lakeshore. 84 Figure 9. Glacial landforms of the Pictured Rocks area. 27 Figure 26. Number of private household wells at various depths in Munising and Burt Townships Figure 10. Pleistocene and Holocene landforms near Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore. 85 in the Pictured Rocks area. 29 Figure 27. Nitrate, VOC, and arsenic samples in Figure 11. General soil association map (STATS- the Pictured Rocks area. 86 GO) for the Pictured Rocks area. 30 Figure 28. Population of areas that border Pic- Figure 12. Lake Superior bathymetry in the Pic- tured Rocks National Lakeshore, 1900-2003. tured Rocks area. 32 87 Figure 13. Shoreline types for Pictured Rocks Na- Figure 29. Numbers of visitors (in 100,000s) to tional Lakeshore. 33 Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore from 1995 to 2004. 90 Figure 14. National Wetlands Inventory for the Pictured Rocks area. 42 Figure 15. Areas of Alger County, MI where gla- cial deposits are the principal source of water to wells. 43 Figure 16. Watersheds for inland waters of Pic- tured Rocks National Lakeshore. 48 Figure 17. Sources of air emissions and locations of NPDES discharge permits in the Pictured Rocks area. 60 Figure 18. Lake Superior shipping lanes. 64 Tables Table i. Water quality indicators and current and Table 14. Parameters detected in wastewater, potential stressors of aquatic resources in Pic- Kimberly-Clark Corporation (now Neenah Pa- tured Rocks National Lakeshore. 14 pers), Munising, MI. 62 Table 1. NPS vegetation classifications for Pic- Table 15. Routine water quality monitoring re- tured Rocks National Lakeshore shoreline zone sults, Kimberly-Clark Corporation (now Neenah and park (shoreline plus inland buffer zone). 20 Papers), Munising, MI. 63 Table 2. Land cover for Pictured Rocks National Table 16. Locations of on-site waste disposal sys- Lakeshore shoreline zone, park (shoreline plus tems at Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore. 69 inland buffer zone), and entire park watershed (shoreline plus inland buffer zone plus other Table 17. Number of sampling dates for streams lands within the Lake Superior watershed drain- and inland lakes in Pictured Rocks National ing to the park). 21 Lakeshore, 1949-2005. 74 Table 3. Soils of Pictured Rocks National Lake- Table 18. Total phosphorus, total nitrogen, nitro- shore. 28 gen to phosphorus ratios, and most recent sam- pling dates for waterbodies in Pictured Rocks Table 4. Lake Superior shoreline types, lengths, National Lakeshore. 76 and USEPA shoreline sensitivity classifications. 34 Table 19. Total alkalinity and most recent sam- pling date for waterbodies in Pictured Rocks Table 5. Classification of Lake Superior fisheries National Lakeshore. 79 habitats by Lake Superior Technical Committee and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 34 Table 20. Cadmium levels and exceedences in streams, Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore. 82 Table 6. Ecological roles of important Lake Su- perior fish species, including non-native species. Table 21. Number of people served by drinking 36 water wells, and methods of wastewater disposal, in Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore. 83 Table 7. Fish species and numbers identified in a survey of Lake Superior waters <9 m in depth in Table 22. Activities of park visitors, Pictured Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, 2002. 37 Rocks National Lakeshore, July and August, 2000, and summer, 2001. 89 Table 8. Selected physical, chemical, and biologi- cal characteristics of some inland lakes in Pic- Table 23. Commercial harvest of Lake Superior tured Rocks National Lakeshore. 38 fish from 1867-2000. 90 Table 9. Selected physical characteristics of Table 24. Water quality indicators and current named streams in Pictured Rocks National Lake- and potential stressors of aquatic
Recommended publications
  • Atlas of the Copepods (Class Crustacea: Subclass Copepoda: Orders Calanoida, Cyclopoida, and Harpacticoida)
    Taxonomic Atlas of the Copepods (Class Crustacea: Subclass Copepoda: Orders Calanoida, Cyclopoida, and Harpacticoida) Recorded at the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve and State Nature Preserve, Ohio by Jakob A. Boehler and Kenneth A. Krieger National Center for Water Quality Research Heidelberg University Tiffin, Ohio, USA 44883 August 2012 Atlas of the Copepods, (Class Crustacea: Subclass Copepoda) Recorded at the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve and State Nature Preserve, Ohio Acknowledgments The authors are grateful for the funding for this project provided by Dr. David Klarer, Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve. We appreciate the critical reviews of a draft of this atlas provided by David Klarer and Dr. Janet Reid. This work was funded under contract to Heidelberg University by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. This publication was supported in part by Grant Number H50/CCH524266 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve in Ohio is part of the National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS), established by Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act, as amended. Additional information about the system can be obtained from the Estuarine Reserves Division, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1305 East West Highway – N/ORM5, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Financial support for this publication was provided by a grant under the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act, administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
    [Show full text]
  • World-Wide Distribution of the Bryozoan Pectinatella Magnifica (Leidy 1851)
    96 European Journal of Environmental Sciences WORLD-WIDE DISTRIBUTION OF THE BRYOZOAN PECTINATELLA MAGNIFICA (LEIDY 1851) ZUZANA BALOUNOVÁ1, EVA PECHOUŠKOVÁ1, JOSEF RAJCHARD1,*, VÍT JOZA1, and JAN ŠINKO2 1 Faculty of Agriculture, University of South Bohemia, CZ 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic 2 Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia, CZ 389 01, Vodňany, Czech Republic * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Pectinatella magnifica (Leidy 1851) is an invasive freshwater colonial animal belonging to the phylum Bryozoa. It is native to the area east of the Mississippi River, from Ontario to Florida. Currently it occurs throughout North America and the first record for it outside that continent was for Bille near Hamburg in 1883. Later, it was found in the Elbe (Havel by Spandau), in Tegeler See, a pond in Wroclaw and in Silesia and Brandenburg. In addition, floatoblasts of P. magnifica were found in the upper Elbe in Germany in the 1950s. Then, P. magnifica spread to the area of Spandau in Berlin and the Oder, and Wroclaw. It is also recorded in Romania and Turkey. In France, it was recorded occurring in the area called Franche-Comté in 1994. Its occurrence in the Netherlands was first reported in 2003 and then each following year. The newest discoveries are for the Rhine basin in the area between Luxembourg and Germany. Recently, it was also recorded in the Czech Republic and Austria. Besides Europe and North America, it is also recorded in Japan and Korea. The statoblasts of P. magnifica are spread by flowing water, zoochory and probably also by anthropochory.
    [Show full text]
  • Benthic Amphipod (Crustacea) Fauna of the Bandırma and Erdek Gulfs and Some Environmental Factors Affecting Their Distribution
    ISSN: 0001-5113 ACTA ADRIAT., ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER AADRAY 56(2): 171 - 188, 2015 Benthic amphipod (Crustacea) fauna of the Bandırma and Erdek Gulfs and some environmental factors affecting their distribution Ayşegül MÜLAYİM*1, Hüsamettin BALKIS1 and Murat SEZGİN2 1 Istanbul University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, 34134 Istanbul,Turkey 2Sinop University, Fisheries Faculty, Department of Hydrobiology 57000 Sinop, Turkey *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] This study aims to determine the environmental factors affecting the fauna and distribution of benthic amphipod species inhabiting in the Bandırma and Erdek Gulfs which are located on the south of the Marmara Sea. Total of 66 species belonging to 22 families were identified after analyzing the samples collected seasonally from the depths ranging between 1 and 30 m between 2007- 2008. According to the data gathered from the literature, it was determined that one species (Bathyporeia elegans Watkin, 1938) was a new record for the Turkish seas and 37 species for the Marmara Sea. In the Bandırma Gulf, of the ecological variables of the environment temperature was determined to range between 6.6-27°C, salinity between 21.32-36.03 psu, dissolved oxygen between 4.04-11.26 mg l-1and pH between 8.00-8.38. In the Erdek Gulf, temperature ranged between 6.7 and 27°C, salinity between 21.93-35.54‰, dissolved oxygen between 3.67-13.26 mg l-1and pH between 8.06-8.36. In the surface sediment at the sampling stations of the Bandırma Gulf, total organic carbon values were between 0.07-4.42%, total calcium carbonate between 0.88-84.82%, total phosphorus between 609-12740 μg g-1 and mud percentage between 1.38-79.93%.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions to and Revisions of the Amphipod (Crustacea: Amphipoda) Fauna of South Africa, with a List of Currently Known Species from the Region
    Additions to and revisions of the amphipod (Crustacea: Amphipoda) fauna of South Africa, with a list of currently known species from the region Rebecca Milne Department of Biological Sciences & Marine Research Institute, University of CapeTown, Rondebosch, 7700 South Africa & Charles L. Griffiths* Department of Biological Sciences & Marine Research Institute, University of CapeTown, Rondebosch, 7700 South Africa E-mail: [email protected] (with 13 figures) Received 25 June 2013. Accepted 23 August 2013 Three species of marine Amphipoda, Peramphithoe africana, Varohios serratus and Ceradocus isimangaliso, are described as new to science and an additional 13 species are recorded from South Africa for the first time. Twelve of these new records originate from collecting expeditions to Sodwana Bay in northern KwaZulu-Natal, while one is an introduced species newly recorded from Simon’s Town Harbour. In addition, we collate all additions and revisions to the regional amphipod fauna that have taken place since the last major monographs of each group and produce a comprehensive, updated faunal list for the region. A total of 483 amphipod species are currently recognized from continental South Africa and its Exclusive Economic Zone . Of these, 35 are restricted to freshwater habitats, seven are terrestrial forms, and the remainder either marine or estuarine. The fauna includes 117 members of the suborder Corophiidea, 260 of the suborder Gammaridea, 105 of the suborder Hyperiidea and a single described representative of the suborder Ingolfiellidea.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report110
    ~ ~ WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A Survey of Rare and Endangered Mayflies of Selected RESEARCH Rivers of Wisconsin by Richard A. Lillie REPORT110 Bureau of Research, Monona December 1995 ~ Abstract The mayfly fauna of 25 rivers and streams in Wisconsin were surveyed during 1991-93 to document the temporal and spatial occurrence patterns of two state endangered mayflies, Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex. Both species are candidates under review for addition to the federal List of Endang­ ered and Threatened Wildlife. Based on previous records of occur­ rence in Wisconsin, sampling was conducted during the period May-July using a combination of sampling methods, including dredges, air-lift pumps, kick-nets, and hand-picking of substrates. No specimens of Anepeorus simplex were collected. Three specimens (nymphs or larvae) of Acanthametropus pecatonica were found in the Black River, one nymph was collected from the lower Wisconsin River, and a partial exuviae was collected from the Chippewa River. Homoeoneuria ammophila was recorded from Wisconsin waters for the first time from the Black River and Sugar River. New site distribution records for the following Wiscon­ sin special concern species include: Macdunnoa persimplex, Metretopus borealis, Paracloeodes minutus, Parameletus chelifer, Pentagenia vittigera, Cercobrachys sp., and Pseudiron centra/is. Collection of many of the aforementioned species from large rivers appears to be dependent upon sampling sand-bottomed substrates at frequent intervals, as several species were relatively abundant during only very short time spans. Most species were associated with sand substrates in water < 2 m deep. Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex should continue to be listed as endangered for state purposes and receive a biological rarity ranking of critically imperiled (S1 ranking), and both species should be considered as candidates proposed for listing as endangered or threatened as defined by the Endangered Species Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016
    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019
    NYSDEC SOP #208-19 Title: Stream Biomonitoring Rev: 1.2 Date: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 188 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State March 2019 Note: Division of Water (DOW) SOP revisions from year 2016 forward will only capture the current year parties involved with drafting/revising/approving the SOP on the cover page. The dated signatures of those parties will be captured here as well. The historical log of all SOP updates and revisions (past & present) will immediately follow the cover page. NYSDEC SOP 208-19 Stream Biomonitoring Rev. 1.2 Date: 03/29/2019 Page 3 of 188 SOP #208 Update Log 1 Prepared/ Revision Revised by Approved by Number Date Summary of Changes DOW Staff Rose Ann Garry 7/25/2007 Alexander J. Smith Rose Ann Garry 11/25/2009 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 1.0 3/29/2012 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 2.0 4/18/2014 • Definition of a reference site clarified (Sect. 8.2.3) • WAVE results added as a factor Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 3.0 4/1/2016 in site selection (Sect. 8.2.2 & 8.2.6) • HMA details added (Sect. 8.10) • Nonsubstantive changes 2 • Disinfection procedures (Sect. 8) • Headwater (Sect. 9.4.1 & 10.2.7) assessment methods added • Benthic multiplate method added (Sect, 9.4.3) Brian Duffy Rose Ann Garry 1.0 5/01/2018 • Lake (Sect. 9.4.5 & Sect. 10.) assessment methods added • Detail on biological impairment sampling (Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 1 Table 1. Current Taxonomic Keys and the Level of Taxonomy Routinely U
    Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Table 1. Current taxonomic keys and the level of taxonomy routinely used by the Ohio EPA in streams and rivers for various macroinvertebrate taxonomic classifications. Genera that are reasonably considered to be monotypic in Ohio are also listed. Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Species Pennak 1989, Thorp & Rogers 2016 Porifera If no gemmules are present identify to family (Spongillidae). Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Cnidaria monotypic genera: Cordylophora caspia and Craspedacusta sowerbii Platyhelminthes Class (Turbellaria) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nemertea Phylum (Nemertea) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Phylum (Nematomorpha) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nematomorpha Paragordius varius monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Ectoprocta monotypic genera: Cristatella mucedo, Hyalinella punctata, Lophopodella carteri, Paludicella articulata, Pectinatella magnifica, Pottsiella erecta Entoprocta Urnatella gracilis monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Polychaeta Class (Polychaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Annelida Oligochaeta Subclass (Oligochaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Hirudinida Species Klemm 1982, Klemm et al. 2015 Anostraca Species Thorp & Rogers 2016 Species (Lynceus Laevicaudata Thorp & Rogers 2016 brachyurus) Spinicaudata Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Williams 1972, Thorp & Rogers Isopoda Genus 2016 Holsinger 1972, Thorp & Rogers Amphipoda Genus 2016 Gammaridae: Gammarus Species Holsinger 1972 Crustacea monotypic genera: Apocorophium lacustre, Echinogammarus ischnus, Synurella dentata Species (Taphromysis Mysida Thorp & Rogers 2016 louisianae) Crocker & Barr 1968; Jezerinac 1993, 1995; Jezerinac & Thoma 1984; Taylor 2000; Thoma et al. Cambaridae Species 2005; Thoma & Stocker 2009; Crandall & De Grave 2017; Glon et al. 2018 Species (Palaemon Pennak 1989, Palaemonidae kadiakensis) Thorp & Rogers 2016 1 Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Informal grouping of the Arachnida Hydrachnidia Smith 2001 water mites Genus Morse et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering Unique Green Algae and Cyanobacteria Isolated from Biocrusts in Highly Saline Potash Tailing Pile Habitats, Using an Integrative Approach
    microorganisms Article Uncovering Unique Green Algae and Cyanobacteria Isolated from Biocrusts in Highly Saline Potash Tailing Pile Habitats, Using an Integrative Approach Veronika Sommer 1,2, Tatiana Mikhailyuk 3, Karin Glaser 1 and Ulf Karsten 1,* 1 Institute for Biological Sciences, Applied Ecology and Phycology, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany; [email protected] (V.S.); [email protected] (K.G.) 2 upi UmweltProjekt Ingenieursgesellschaft mbH, 39576 Stendal, Germany 3 National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 4 September 2020; Accepted: 22 October 2020; Published: 27 October 2020 Abstract: Potash tailing piles caused by fertilizer production shape their surroundings because of the associated salt impact. A previous study in these environments addressed the functional community “biocrust” comprising various micro- and macro-organisms inhabiting the soil surface. In that previous study, biocrust microalgae and cyanobacteria were isolated and morphologically identified amongst an ecological discussion. However, morphological species identification maybe is difficult because of phenotypic plasticity, which might lead to misidentifications. The present study revisited the earlier species list using an integrative approach, including molecular methods. Seventy-six strains were sequenced using the markers small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer (ITS). Phylogenetic analyses confirmed some morphologically identified species. However, several other strains could only be identified at the genus level. This indicates a high proportion of possibly unknown taxa, underlined by the low congruence of the previous morphological identifications to our results. In general, the integrative approach resulted in more precise species identifications and should be considered as an extension of the previous morphological species list.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Key for the Genera of Elmidae (Coleoptera, Byrrhoidea) Occurring in Goiás State, Brazil, Including New Records and Distributional Notes
    Revista Brasileira de Entomologia http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262013005000004 Taxonomic key for the genera of Elmidae (Coleoptera, Byrrhoidea) occurring in Goiás State, Brazil, including new records and distributional notes Felipe F. Barbosa1, André S. Fernandes2,3 & Leandro G. Oliveira1,4 1Universidade Federal de Goiás, Campus Samambaia, Departamento de Ecologia, LAMARH (Laboratório de Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Caixa Postal 131, 74001–970 Goiânia-GO, Brazil. 2Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), de la Barceloneta 37–49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain. 3Capes Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Caixa Postal 250, 70040–020 Brasília-DF, Brazil. 4 CNPq Fellow (PQ – Proc. 303835/2009–5, PIBIC – SAP 33226). ABSTRACT. A taxonomic key for the genera of Elmidae (Coleoptera, Byrrhoidea) occurring in Goiás State, Brazil, including new records and distributional notes. Despite their great diversity and high abundance in Neotropical aquatic environments, the fauna of Elmidae remains practically unknown in some areas and even entire biomes in this region. In this work we bring, for the first time, faunistic data for the Elmidae of central Brazil. The aim of this work was to inventory the Elmidae fauna in central, southwestern and southeastern Goiás State, Brazil and to produce a taxonomic key, at genus level, for adults from the studied region. The taxonomic key presented herein offers means for the identification of all the 13 genera known to occur in Goiás, 11 of them being new records for the State. Moreover, the number of named species registered for Goiás increased from one to nine. KEYWORDS. Cerrado biome; Insecta; Neotropics; Riffle beetles.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Pictured Rocks
    WATER RESOURCES OF PICTURED ROCKS NATIONAL LAKESHORE, MICHIGAN By A. H. Handy and F. R. Twenter U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 85-4103 Prepared in cooperation with the NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Lansing, Michigan 1985 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch 6520 Mercantile Way, Suite 5 U.S. Geological Survey Lansing, Michigan 48910 Box 25425, Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 Telephone: (303) 236-7476 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduct ion 2 Purpose and scope 6 Methods of investigation 6 Acknowledgments 6 Hydrogeologic setting 8 Bedrock 9 Glacial deposits 10 Recent alluvium and dune sand 10 Surface Water 11 Lakes 11 Streams 14 Qual it y 16 Ground Water 19 Potentiometric surface 19 Availability 20 Qual it y 21 Water use and sources of supply 22 Park 22 Park Headquarters 23 Summary and conclusions 25 References cited 26 Definition of terms 27 Well-location system 28 Tables 29 FIGURES Page Figure 1. Map showing location of Pictured Rocks National Lakeshpre 2 2. Map showing physical and cultural features 3 3. Map showing topographic features along Pictured Rocks 4 4. Map showing topographic features around 12-Mile Beach 5 5. Map showing topographic features along Grand Sable Banks 5 6. Map showing areal distribution of bedrock unit 9 7. Map showing areal distribution of glacial deposits 10 8. Hydrographs showing water-level fluctuations at selected lakes 12 9.
    [Show full text]