Ticket: # 1282422

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ticket: # 1282422 _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1282422 - Terrible comcast speed issues constantly Date: 10/22/2016 10:35:40 PM City/State/Zip: Bethlehem, Georgia 30620 Company Complaining About: Comcast _____________________________________________________________________________ Description very in inconsistent internet speeds _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1283005 - Multiple issues Date: 10/23/2016 6:20:51 PM City/State/Zip: Lynnwood, Washington 98037 Company Complaining About: Frontier Communications _____________________________________________________________________________ Description We have had multiple issues with Frontier, our WiFi is incredibly slow and we called multiple times to have it fixed and the problem persists. They sent a technician over last week and he changed our router which did not fix the problem, he also gave us an extra router in case the problem doesn't get fixed(which obviously it didn't) Along with the poor quality of our internet, they have raised our monthly bill by 80$ over the course of a few months, which didn't give us any new features or anything. They have cut our service off even though the bill has been paid on numerous occasions, and then charged us a re-connection fee. _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1283439 - Centurylink internet Date: 10/24/2016 9:43:45 AM City/State/Zip: Seattle, Washington 98119 Company Complaining About: Centurylink _____________________________________________________________________________ Description She has complained many times to Centurylink about the speed of her internet. She is house bound and she needs to use the internet, there are times when she cannot conduct her business on the internet. This is the 2nd time in 6 months that her service has been slow for weeks at a time. The service gets so slow that she cannot access the internet. They are refusing to sent a tech out and they are refusing to credit her. _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1283608 - Unresolved Internet Issues Date: 10/24/2016 11:11:48 AM City/State/Zip: Capitol Heights, Maryland 20743 Company Complaining About: Comcast _____________________________________________________________________________ Description I have been contacting Comcast of the span of several months to get some stability with my internet connection, and for months I have been told everything was either fine or it was due to an issue at the tower. I have had several technicians come in my home, go up the pole outside and check the connections, all to no avail. My husband has replaced the modem, per their instructions, and I have unplugged the coaxial cable and power plug several times a day in order to get a signal. _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1283935 - Re: FCC complaint Date: 10/24/2016 1:19:37 PM City/State/Zip: Cedar Hill, Texas 75104 Company Complaining About: AT&T _____________________________________________________________________________ Description This is a follow-up to your previous request #1252739 "FCC complaint" All areas of the original complaint were never address in the AT&T statement: Issue #1 Representative hanging up on my call - Disconnection of calls to AT&T by customer service representative (see previous complaint that was closed without explanation) Issue #2 Internet and data instability I continue to have problems with AT&T internet and data capabilities on the mobile phone and in my home. I have gone "over" on internet usage in my phone because of the slow internet access. (see documentation from internet speed on FCC app) Data Usage on my cell phone is slow and I have unlimited data. I can prove that speeds have been throttled. (see some of the speeds of data usage Issue #3 Rich neighborhoods have choices of high speed internet and other neighborhoods (within feet of them) do not. High income neighborhood within feet from our home has higher speed internet access. AT&T did not provide actual specifics. The telecommunications line is directly behind my home according to our HOA. Our home was actually built before all the high end homes. I send documentation to that effect. The explanation of AT&T is broad and does not explain why? Nor does it give the actual mapping. Why are homes with in feet of my home not provided equal access. If internet considered as a public utility...Then why is AT&T allowed to provide unequal access. The law is specific as far as requirements of internet companies to upgrade its infrastructure. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/1302 The lack of equal access with in the same area literally feet within my home is discriminatory. This is an issue that dates back to the construction of our home in 2004. The rich gated areas were built earlier in 2001, 2002. And, according to AT&T's own mapping - no home under $500,000 in value (in a 5 mile radius from our home) has high speed internet access. In my particular case, our homes in the (b) (6) actually were built after the $500,000- $800,000 homes the the gated sub divisions directly behind our home. _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1283939 - Poor Internet Service Date: 10/24/2016 1:22:32 PM City/State/Zip: Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Company Complaining About: Centurylink _____________________________________________________________________________ Description We can not more like 3/4 of the time get internet service. We are not receiving all of our emails. I could not even look up a telephone number because the internet is not working. They want to say there is a problem with my equipment but there is nothing wrong with my equipment. I had a tech guy come out one time that i paid $100 for and he found that there were no issues with my computer or modem. I have him coming out again to double check. I am not the only person this is happening to my neighbors are also having these problems. _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1284193 - Centurylink throttling internet speeds Date: 10/24/2016 2:56:44 PM City/State/Zip: Phoenix, Arizona 85022 Company Complaining About: Centurylink _____________________________________________________________________________ Description This is the second time I've had to file a complaint about throttled internet speeds, the first time they fixed it and it worked fine for a couple of weeks but recently it has been very slow just like before. Last night a device couldn't connect so I restarted the modem and after that it couldn't even connect to the internet. _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1284690 - The Comcast speed slows Date: 10/24/2016 5:58:57 PM City/State/Zip: Dunmore, Pennsylvania 18512 Company Complaining About: Comcast _____________________________________________________________________________ Description Comcast's internet is so slow for a few hours. Contact to Comcast tech support and they still unable to solve the problem on their end, and they wants to send the technician to come over my place. It is again same problem like 2 months ago. Last time Comcast was here on August 2016. Test Result: http://results.speedtest.xfinity.com/result/1416225804.png _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1284909 - Slow internet service cases 101240129 , 101200220 filed 10/2016 and 53392424 filed 4/5/2016 Date: 10/24/2016 7:59:57 PM City/State/Zip: Craryville, New York 12521 Company Complaining About: Hughes Net _____________________________________________________________________________ Description HughesNet seems incapable of providing internet service to me, at satisfactory speeds. It can take 10 mins to load a web site and some websites do not even load because of the slow service. Over the years I have tried addressing this issue, I have performed countless tests, changed my modem, router etc. cut down trees, have had a technician inspect my installation etc. now over the last 2-4 months my service has slowed even more. When I call HN technical support I am told that my service has been slowed because I have used up my data allowance. I have made several calls and each time I hear I am being slowed down purposefully by HN. At least 2 representatives have told me that I am UNDER using my data allowance e.g. 90-200 MG.s per month versus my allowance of 10GBs. Today I was told I was over using my allowance. It seems like HN is unsure of whether I am over or under utilizing my data allowance and is just slowing me down any way. It would be useful to find out what my actual usage is so,if necessary I can buy more data - or claim a refund. Several attempts to find out my data usage has only resulted in completely different usage numbers. Please help me get an internet service that is not periodically slowed down for no given reason. Thank you. _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1285431 - Bright House Network service is terrible and getting worse. Date: 10/25/2016 8:55:14 AM City/State/Zip: Orlando, Florida 32817 Company Complaining About: Bright House _____________________________________________________________________________ Description I'm not one to ever complain. But this company is the worst. For years I had not been getting a consistent internet

  1037
Recommended publications
  • In the Matter of ) ) City of Wilson, North Carolina ) ) Petition for Preemption of ) North Carolina General Statutes ) § 160A-340 Et Seq
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 ____________________________________ ) ) In the Matter of ) ) City of Wilson, North Carolina ) ) Petition for Preemption of ) North Carolina General Statutes ) § 160A-340 et seq. ) WC Docket No. 14-115 ) The Electric Power Board of ) Chattanooga, Tennessee ) ) Petition for Preemption of a Portion of ) Section 7-52-601 of the Tennessee Code ) Annotated ) WC Docket No. 14-116 ) ____________________________________ ) COMMENTS OF THE FIBER TO THE HOME COUNCIL AMERICAS IN SUPPORT OF ELECTRIC POWER BOARD AND CITY OF WILSON PETITIONS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 706 OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996, SEEKING PREEMPTION OF STATE LAWS RESTRICTING THE DEPLOYMENT OF CERTAIN BROADBAND NETWORKS Heather Burnett Gold President Fiber to the Home Council Americas 6841 Elm Street #843 McLean, VA 22101 Telephone: (202) 365-5530 August 29, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ............................................................................................1 I. MUNICIPAL UTILITIES HAVE AN IMPORTANT ROLE TO PLAY WHERE PRIVATE PROVIDERS HAVE NOT DEPLOYED ADEQUATE ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY IN A REASONABLE AND TIMELY FASHION ............................................................................................................3 II. STATE LAWS AND RULES THAT BAR DEPLOYMENT OF ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY BY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES IN AREAS WHERE PRIVATE PROVIDERS HAVE NOT DEPLOYED ADEQUATE ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY IN A REASONABLE AND
    [Show full text]
  • Kirja-Alan Onix
    KIRJA-ALAN ONIX SUOMALAINEN SOVELLUS Versio 3.0.2. Marraskuu 2012 Päivitetty huhtikuu 2015 Helsinki 2012 ISBN 978-952-10-8321-1 (PDF) Työryhmä: Mirja Anttila, Kansalliskirjasto Peter Bagge, Kustannusosakeyhtiö Otava Juha Hakala, Kansalliskirjasto Jari Heikkinen, Kansalliskirjasto Susanna Honkanen, Suomalainen Kirjakauppa Oy Maarit Huttunen, Kansalliskirjasto Karin von Koskull, Stockmann Oyj Abp, Akateeminen Kirjakauppa Tuomo Suominen, Sanoma Pro Oy Olli Tuuteri, BTJ Finland Oy Aija Vahtola, Kansalliskirjasto Eila Vainikka, Kuntaliitto Susanna Vestman, Kirjavälitys Oy Laura Vuorensola, Stockmann Oyj Abp, Akateeminen kirjakauppa Suomalainen ONIX-sovellus perustuu seuraaviin dokumentteihin: ONIX for Books Product Information Format Specification Release 3.0 revision 1, January 2012 ONIX for Books: Code Lists Issues 18–27 Alkuperäiset dokumentit ovat saatavilla osoitteessa http://www.editeur.org/ Kommentit formaattiin ja mahdolliset lisäkysymykset Suomen ONIX-keskukselle. http://www.onix.fi/ 1 Sisällys Suomalaisen sovelluksen esipuhe ........................................................................................................... 4 ONIX-viesti .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Viestin rakenne ................................................................................................................................... 5 P.1 Tuotetietueen viite ja tyyppi (Record reference number, type and source) .............................
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Benefits of Broadband Competition in Terms of Service and Opportunities for Low-Income Communities
    DRAFT Benefits of Broadband Competition in Terms of Service and Opportunities for Low-Income Communities Prepared for the City of Madison, Wisconsin Benefits of Broadband Competition | DRAFT | March 2018 March 2018 Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 2 Research Overview on Competition and Digital Equity .......................................................... 3 3 Two Case Studies on the Effects of Competition .................................................................... 6 3.1 The Google Fiber Case ...................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 Arrival of Google Fiber in Kansas City ....................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Comcast and Time Warner Cable Announce Free Speed Increases ......................... 6 3.1.3 AT&T Announces Upgrades and Cites Push for “Competition” ............................... 7 3.1.4 Incumbents May Have Boosted Speeds as Early as 2012 ......................................... 7 3.2 The Urbana/Champaign Case ........................................................................................... 7 3.2.1 The UC2B Network .................................................................................................... 7 3.2.2 Incumbent Response Began When UC2B Starts Connecting Homes ....................... 8 3.2.3 AT&T and Comcast Stopped Raising Prices and Comcast Boosted Speeds .............
    [Show full text]
  • ED 354 880 INSTITUTION REPORT NO PUB DATE AVAILABLE from PUB TYPE EDRS PRICE DESCRIPTORS DOCUMENT RESUME IR 016 010 Telecommunic
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 354 880 IR 016 010 TITLE Telecommunications and Education. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Communications of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, Second Session (July 29, 1992). INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. REPORT NO ISBN-0-16-040018-X; Senate-Hrg-102-1001 PUB DATE 93 NOTE 150p. AVAILABLE FROMU.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) EDRS PRICE MF01/1-006 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Access to Education; *Distance Education; Educationally Disadvantaged; *Educational Technology; Elementary Secondary Education; Hearings; Higher Education; Information Dissemination; National Programs; *Online Systems; Rural Areas; *Technological Advancement; *Telecommunications; Telecourses IDENTIFIERS Congress 102nd; SMARTLINE ABSTRACT Testimony on the use of telecommunications technologies in education was given at this hearing. The focus was to examine how new and old technologies can he used to help schools and universities serve children more effectively and to extend the reach of educational institutions to rural and underserved communities. Although there is a great deal of technology in the marketplace, there is no coordinated effort at the national level to ascertain how it can be used most effectively considering limited financial resources. Statements by Senators Burns, Hollings, Inouye, McCain, Pressler, Stevens, and Jeff Bingaman were followed by an address by Diane Ravitch, Assistant Secretary of Education from the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, who reviewed uses of telecommunications technology in education and introduced the proposed SMARTLINE computer interactive information service thatcan be a beginning of a comprehensive distance learning system.
    [Show full text]
  • March 7, 2016 Via ECFS Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal
    March 7, 2016 Via ECFS Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: American Cable Association Notice of Ex Parte Presentation; Implementation of Section 103 of the STELA Reauthorization Act, MB Docket No. 15-216; Expanding Consumers’ Video Navigation Choices, Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices, MB Docket No. 16-42 and CS Docket No. 97-80 Dear Ms. Dortch: On March 3, 2016, Ross Lieberman, Senior Vice President, Government Affairs, American Cable Association (“ACA”), Mary C. Lovejoy, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, ACA, the undersigned, and representatives from five ACA member companies met with Michelle Carey, Deputy Bureau Chief of the Media Bureau, Associate Bureau Chief Nancy Murphy, Martha Heller, Policy Division Chief, Steve Broeckaert, Senior Deputy Policy Division Chief, and Brendan Murray, Assistant Policy Division Chief. The ACA members in attendance were: x Chad Winters, Vice President, Manager of Cable TV Services, Cass Cable x Chris Kyle, Vice President of Industry Relations and Regulatory Affairs, Shentel x John Higginbotham, Assistant General Manager – Cable/Telecommunications, Frankfort Plant Board x Leslie Brown, Sr. Vice President and General Counsel, Atlantic Broadband x John Conrad, Vice President, General Counsel, Liberty Puerto Rico During the meeting, the ACA member companies discussed changes in the marketplace, their experiences negotiating retransmission consent, and their concerns about the impact of the Commission’s proposed approach to ensuring the commercial availability of navigations devices. Their remarks were consistent with ACA’s filed comments concerning reform of the Commission’s retransmission consent good faith rules and concerning adoption of competitive navigation device requirements based on device proposals discussed in the Downloadable Security Technical Advisory Committee (“DSTAC”) Final Report.1 1 See, generally, Implementation of Section 103 of the STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014, Totality of the Circumstances Test, MB Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 Digital Connectivity for Tomorrow’S World…
    Digital connectivity for tomorrow’s world… Millicom Annual Report 2017 Digital connectivity for tomorrow’s world… We are a leading provider of cable and mobile services dedicated to emerging markets. We operate under the Tigo® brand in eight countries across Latin America and three in Africa. We set the pace when it comes to providing high-speed broadband, innovative services and our trademark The Digital Lifestyle® to more than 50 million customers. Our purpose is to build the digital highways that connect people, improve lives and develop our communities. Our mission is to provide the best, most secure digital highways to be the first choice for customers in all our markets. For further information on Millicom’s results, please refer to our Reporting Center: www.millicom.com/investors/ Millicom Annual Report 2017 Overview Overview Millicom at a glance 02 What’s inside Our year in numbers 03 Chairman’s statement 04 Market overview 08 this report… Our business model 10 Strategy Chief Executive Officer’s statement 12 Integrated reporting Our strategy 14 Strategy Measuring progress against strategy 15 This is our second integrated Annual Report that combines our corporate responsibility and financial reports to provide all our stakeholders Performance with a clear and comprehensive overview of Chief Financial Officer’s review 17 our business. It reflects both the strong social Risk management 25 and economic impact of our products and How we are doing in Latin America 30 services on the communities we serve, and our How we are doing in Africa 38 responsible business practices throughout our Growing responsibly and with purpose 44 operations.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBERTY LATIN AMERICA LTD. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 9, 2019 LIBERTY LATIN AMERICA LTD. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Bermuda 001-38335 98-1386359 (State or other jurisdiction (Commission (IRS Employer of incorporation) File Number) Identification No.) Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda (Address of Principal Executive Office) (303) 925-6000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2 below): ☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Trading Name of each exchange Title of each class Symbol(s) on which registered Class A Shares, par value $0.01 per share LILA The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Class C Shares, par value $0.01 per share LILAK The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (17 CFR §230.405) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR §240.12b-2).
    [Show full text]
  • ONN 6 Eng Codelist Only Webversion.Indd
    6-DEVICE UNIVERSAL REMOTE Model: 100020904 CODELIST Need help? We’re here for you every day 7 a.m. – 9 p.m. CST. Give us a call at 1-888-516-2630 Please visit the website “www.onn-support.com” to get more information. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CODELIST TV 3 STREAM 5 STB 5 AUDIO SOUNDBAR 21 BLURAY DVD 22 2 CODELIST TV TV EQD 2014, 2087, 2277 EQD Auria 2014, 2087, 2277 Acer 4143 ESA 1595, 1963 Admiral 3879 eTec 2397 Affinity 3717, 3870, 3577, Exorvision 3953 3716 Favi 3382 Aiwa 1362 Fisher 1362 Akai 1675 Fluid 2964 Akura 1687 Fujimaro 1687 AOC 3720, 2691, 1365, Funai 1595, 1864, 1394, 2014, 2087 1963 Apex Digital 2397, 4347, 4350 Furrion 3332, 4093 Ario 2397 Gateway 1755, 1756 Asus 3340 GE 1447 Asustek 3340 General Electric 1447 Atvio 3638, 3636, 3879 GFM 1886, 1963, 1864 Atyme 2746 GPX 3980, 3977 Audiosonic 1675 Haier 2309, 1749, 1748, Audiovox 1564, 1276, 1769, 3382, 1753, 3429, 2121 2293, 4398, 2214 Auria 4748, 2087, 2014, Hannspree 1348, 2786 2277 Hisense 3519, 4740, 4618, Avera 2397, 2049 2183, 5185, 1660, Avol 2735, 4367, 3382, 3382, 4398 3118, 1709 Hitachi 1643, 4398, 5102, Axen 1709 4455, 3382, 0679 Axess 3593 Hiteker 3118 BenQ 1756 HKPro 3879, 2434 Blu:sens 2735 Hyundai 4618 Bolva 2397 iLo 1463, 1394 Broksonic 1892 Insignia 2049, 1780, 4487, Calypso 4748 3227, 1564, 1641, Champion 1362 2184, 1892, 1423, Changhong 4629 1660, 1963, 1463 Coby 3627 iSymphony 3382, 3429, 3118, Commercial Solutions 1447 3094 Conia 1687 JVC 1774, 1601, 3393, Contex 4053, 4280 2321, 2271, 4107, Craig 3423 4398, 5182, 4105, Crosley 3115 4053, 1670, 1892, Curtis
    [Show full text]
  • Fiber Trends: What 2021 Promises for the Broadband Industry
    INDUSTRY ANALYSIS Fiber Trends: What 2021 Promises For the Broadband Industry The 2021 broadband plans of incumbent telcos, independents, cable operators and electric co-ops will have a ripple effect on consumers and businesses. By Sean Buckley / Broadband Communities s the new year begins, BROADBAND the next decade if the telecom companies COMMUNITIES is asking industry successfully execute on their plans,” said Acolleagues what will drive the broadband Jonathan Chaplin, equity analyst for New industry in 2021. If anything is clear about the Street Research, in a research note. “This would past year, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted take FTTH availability from 25 percent to that broadband has gone from being a luxury to a 35 percent of households – we assume growth necessity for remote learning and remote work. in occupied households of about 1 percent.” Key to that is a fiber-based symmetrical Render predicts that the potential number of connection. Whether service is from homes that could be passed by FTTH will be an incumbent telco, a cable company, a even larger when taking into account that a host municipality or an electric cooperative, fiber has of emerging players are building out service to a ripple effect: It gives consumers higher speeds more homes. “There are more than 1,000 other and can serve as an economic development tool providers in the United States alone – some to attract and retain businesses. small, some medium, some large – that add RVA LLC noted that as of 2020, more than up to more than 10 million,” Render said. 54 million U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC-15-25A1.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 15-25 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) City of Wilson, North Carolina ) WC Docket No. 14-115 Petition for Preemption of North Carolina General ) Statute Sections 160A-340 et seq. ) ) The Electric Power Board of ) WC Docket No. 14-116 Chattanooga, Tennessee ) Petition for Preemption of a Portion of Tennessee ) Code Annotated Section 7-52-601 ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 26, 2015 Released: March 12, 2015 By the Commission: Chairman Wheeler and Commissioners Clyburn and Rosenworcel issuing separate statements; Commissioners Pai and O’Rielly dissenting and issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Para. I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Executive Summary......................................................................................................................... 1 B. Background.................................................................................................................................... 17 1. The Commission’s Mandate Under Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act ................. 18 2. The EPB Petition and Territorial Restriction in Section 601 .................................................. 22 3. The Wilson Petition and H.B.129 ........................................................................................... 33 II. PREEMPTION OF PROHIBITIONS ON MUNICIPAL PROVISION
    [Show full text]
  • Blair Levin and Denise Linn a Guide for Community Leaders Seeking
    THE NEXT GENERATION NETWORK CONNECTIVITY HANDBOOK A Guide for Community Leaders Seeking Affordable, Abundant Bandwidth Vol 2.0 December 2016 Blair Levin and Denise Linn Gig.U: The Next Generation Network Innovation Project Published by the Benton Foundation 2 Dedication This Handbook is dedicated to the hundreds of city and university officials, particularly participants in Gig.U, who over the last five years, as we explored many routes, helped guide us to significant course corrections and created the map for community-led broadband. It is also dedicated to the thousands of citizens who attended scores of meetings with us on community-led broadband, in cities large and small, in every part of the country, and who provided many insights we incorporated into our work and into this Handbook. Many of their words were wise, but none were wiser than those offered by a student at an event at the University of Maine, who, after noting all the specific reasons he was excited about having access to abundant bandwidth then said, “But what is most exciting is what we don’t yet know.” It is further dedicated to the memory of Charles Benton, a wonderful friend and coach to the Gig.U project, and many others seeking to improve the capacity of communications networks to serve all. His energy and excitement about discovering ‘what we don’t yet know’ served, and will continue to serve, as the most important type of fuel for the work of bringing affordable, abundant bandwidth to our communities. 3 Contents About this Handbook 5 What are the Funding Issues
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Based Broadband Solutions
    COMMUNITY-BASED BROADBAND SOLUTIONS THE BENEFITS OF COMPETITION AND CHOICE FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HIGHSPEED INTERNET ACCESS The Executive Office of the President January 2015 1 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 3 Economic Benefits of Broadband ...................................................................................................... 5 Challenges in Broadband Access and Adoption ............................................................................... 6 Broadband Competition .................................................................................................................. 10 Community-Based Broadband ........................................................................................................ 13 Chattanooga, TN: Gigabit service drives investment, innovation .............................................. 13 Wilson, NC: Municipal broadband encourages private competition ......................................... 14 Lafayette, LA: Network increases customer savings, strengthens local anchor institutions .... 15 Scott County, MN: Municipal government sees savings for county, school operations ........... 16 Leverett, MA: State and federal programs enable local investment ...........................................17 Choctaw Nation Tribal Area, OK: Public private collaboration brings broadband to new communities ..................................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]