DOCSLIB.ORG

THE DISTRIBUTION of the PODOCARPACEAE. (CE Foweraker.)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE DISTRIBUTION of the PODOCARPACEAE. (CE Foweraker.) THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE PODOCARPACEAE. (C. E. Foweraker.) INTRODUCTION: New Zealand possesses seventeen indigenous species of podocarps some of which are classed among the chief timber trees. One species, Dacrydium cupressinum (rimu), may be considered the most important timber tree in the Dominion. According to Hutchinson (1) it forms "65 per cent, of the total timber production, over 40 per cent, of the present visible supply of all timbers and 75 per cent. of the present visible supply of softwoods." This tree is distributed irregularly throughout the Dominion, being found chiefly where the rainfall exceeds 50 inches annu­ ally. Other notable podocarps of economic value are Dac­ rydium Colensoi (silver pine), Podocarpus totara (totara), P. spicatus (matai), and P. dacrydioides (kahikatea). The podocarp rain forest of New Zealand presents many interesting and economically important problems; articles in previous numbers of this journal have dealt with the podocarps in various aspects, special attention being paid to rimu in regard to its silvics. No student of New Zealand forestry can fail to be impressed by the part played by the indigenous podocarps, but he may not fully realise that the family of gymnosperms known as the Podocarp­ aceae is widely distributed throughout the southern hemi­ sphere. It is the purpose of this paper to deal in a general way with the geographical distribution of the podocarps in the hope that it may be of assistance to students interested in dendrology and in the geographical range of species allied to the indigenous podocarps. I am indebted to Mr. 0. Craddock, M.A., for assistance in the compilation of the map. NEW ZEALAND PODOCARPS: As stated above the species of podocarps usually as­ signed to New Zealand are seventeen in number belonging to three genera as follows:— Podocarpus totara (totara). Podocarpus Hallii (Halls totara) Podocarpus acutifolius (sharp-leaved totara) Podocarpus nivalis (alpine totara) 160 Podocarpus ferrugineus (miro) Podocarpus spicatus (matai) Podocarpus dacrydioides (kahikatea) Dacrydium Kirkii (manoao) Dacrydium biforme (pink pine) Dacrydium Bidwillii (Bidwill's pine) Dacrydium cupressinum (rimu) Dacrydium intermedium (mountain pine) Dacrydium Colensoi (silver pine) Dacrydium laxifolium (pigmy pine) Phyllocladus trichomanoides (tanekaha) Phyllocladus glaucus (toatoa) Phyllocladus alpinus (mountain toatoa) The above is the taxonomy adopted by Cheeseman (2), but some of the species, e.g. Podocarpus Hallii, and P. acu­ tifolius, seem difficult to define and it is probable that regional races of some species occur. It is not the purpose of this paper to deal in detail with the New Zealand podo­ carps from the point of view of their regional distribution which is somewhat intricate. Two species, viz. Dacrydium Kirkii and Phyllocladus glaucus occur only in the northern part of the Dominion. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE VARIOUS GENERA OF THE PODOCARPACEAE. Pilger (3) gives the genera of the podocarps as fol­ lows :— Pherosphaera (2 spp.) Microcachrys (1 sp.) Saxegothaea (1 sp). Dacrydium (about 20 spp.) Acmopyle (1 sp.) Podocarpus (about 70 spp.) Phyllocladus (7 spp.) The total is therefore seven genera and about one hundred species. It is proposed below to consider in turn the distribution of the species of each genus, the taxonomy followed being that of Pilger. The geographical range of each species is treated generally and broadly. No attempt is made at botanical description as this is beyond the scope of the present paper. (a) PHEROSPHAERA. One of the two species, P. Hookeriana occurs in Tas­ mania and P. Fitzgeraldii in New South Wales. 161 (b) MICROCACHRYS. One species, M. tetragona in Tasmania. (c) SAXEGOTHAEA. One species S. conspicua in southern Chile. (d) DACRYDIUM. This has a fairly wide distribution with perhaps about 20 species in the Malay Archipelago, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Tasmania and S. Chile. The actual distribution of the majority of the species is as follows:— 1. New Zealand (Already mentioned above.) 2. Tasmania D. Franklini. 3. New Caledonia D. taxoides, D. araucarioides, D. lycopodioides, D. balansae. Jf. Burma, Indo-China, Malay States, Sumatra, Borneo, Philippines, New Guinea, Fiji:— D. elatum. 5. Borneo. D. falciforme, D. Beccarii, and D. Gibbsiae. 6. Chile. D. Fonkii. (e) ACMOPYLE. One species, A. Pancheri in New Caledonia. (f) PODOCARPUS. This genus has the widest distribution of all the podo­ carps and comprises nearly 70 species distributed as fol­ lows :— 1. New Zealand . (Already mentioned above.) 2. Australia P. elatus and P. spinulosus (E. Australia), P. Drony- nianus (W. Aust.), P. Ladei (Queensland), P. alpinus (Tasmania and N.S.W.) 3. New Caledonia P. ferruginoides, P. Viellardii, P. ustus, P. minor, P. Muelleri, P. gnidioides. .£. Malay Archipelago, Philippines, New Guinea, Etc. P. amarus (Java, Sumatra; N. Guinea and Queens­ land), P. Motleyi (Borneo), P. Blumei (Java, Moluccas, 162 UJ < uUJ < •a. < u o Q 0 Q. UJ I H U- 0 z q H D CD E H 5 ab 0=6 28 X _ N >0 ^- IO O N Celebes, N. Guinea, Philippines), P. polystachyus (Java, Sumatra, Borneo, Philippines), P. Rumphii (N. Guinea, Celebes, Moluccas, Philippines), P. thevetiifolius, P. Schlechteri, P. Ledermannii (New Guinea), P. Pilgeri (Celebes and Philippines), P. costalis, P. philippinensis and P. glaucus (Celebes and Philippines). P. Koordersii (Java). 5. Pacific Islands P. vitiensis (Fiji). 6. Japan P. macrophyllus and P. nagi (Japan), P. nankoensis and P. Nakaii (Formosa). 7. Africa P. falcatus and P. latifolius (S. E. Africa), P. graci- lior (Uganda), P. Manii (San Tome), P. milanjianus and P. usambarensis (E. Africa), P. elongatus (S. Africa), P. madagascariensis (Madagascar). 8. India, Etc. P. neriifolius (Nepal; also in Philippines and New Guinea), P. Wallichianiis (Assam, Burma), P. imbricatus (Burma, also in Borneo, Java and Philippines). 9. South America P. andinus, P. salignus, P. nubigenus (Chile), P. Par- latorei (Argentine and Bolivia), P. oleifolius (Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador), P. glomeratus (Peru, Ecuador), P. Mon­ tanus (Bolivia), P. utilior (Peru), P. coriaceus and P. raac- rostachyus (Venezuela and Colombia), P. Se?i(n and P. Lambertii (S. Brazil), P. Roraimae (Guiana). 10. West Indies & Central America P. Urbanii and P. Purdieanus (Jamaica), P. angusti­ folius (Cuba), P. Buchii (Haiti), P. guatemalensis (Guate­ mala) . (g) PHYLLOCLADUS. The seven species mentioned by Pilger are distributed as follows:— 1. New Zealand P. glaucus, P. trichomanoides, P. alpinus. 2. Tasmania P. aspleniifolius. 3. Borneo P. hypophyllus. 4. New Guinea P. major, P. protractus, (also in Moluccas and Philip­ pines). 164 REMARKS ON DISTRIBUTION. The above lists of species with references to their geo­ graphical range will show that the genus with the widest distribution is Podocarpus. This spreads widely embrac­ ing about 70 species in a wide belt reaching from Africa through Indo-Malaysia, Australia and New Zealand to South America and the West Indies. It is, like the Podo­ carpaceae as a whole, a genus mainly of the southern hemi­ sphere but stretches north across the equator in Eastern Africa through Malaysia to India and Japan, and beyond the Andean region into Central America and the West Indies. Dacrydium has a narrower range being found in the Malay Archipelago, Tasmania, New Zealand, the Pacific Islands and Chile. Phyllocladus is still more restricted being confined to the Malay Archipelago, Tasmania and New Zealand. The remaining four genera have but a local distribu­ tion. Pherosphaera occurs in New South Wales and Tas­ mania, Microcachrys in Tasmania, Acmopyle in New Cale­ donia and Saxegothaea in S. Chile. If one assumes the former existence of a southern land mass connecting or comprising the existing southern land masses, one could imagine the existence of some primi­ tive podocarp "plexus" which gave rise to the existing species after long isolation in their respective habitats. Podocarps do not exist in Europe and North America al­ though certain alleged fossil forms have been found in various northern countries. It is difficult to speculate on the possible origin of the podocarps, but their wide distrib­ ution in the southern hemisphere indicates a long evolu­ tionary phase in these lands. It is worthy of note that the podocarps of New Zea­ land are all endemic and must have taken a vast period of time to evolve to their present forms. Each New Zealand species has evolved to a type adapted to certain site condi­ tions. LITERATURE CITED. (1) Hutchinson, F. E. "The Life History of the Westland Rimu Stands." Te Kura Ngahere, Vol. III., No. 2, 1932, p. 53. (2) Cheeseman, T. F. "Manual of the New Zealand Flora," 1925. (3) Pilger, R. "Podocarpaceae," Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 13 Band, 1926. 165 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Review of Environmental History: Volume 5, Issue 1, 2019
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction James Beattie 1 Nature’s revenge: War on the wilderness during the opening of Brazil’s ‘Last Western Frontier’ Sandro Dutra e Silva 5 Water as the ultimate sink: Linking fresh and saltwater history Simone M. Müller and David Stradling 23 Climate change: Debate and reality Daniel R. Headrick 43 Biofuels’ unbalanced equations: Misleading statistics, networked knowledge and measured parameters Kate B. Showers 61 ‘To get a cargo of flesh, bone, and blood’: Animals in the slave trade in West Africa Christopher Blakley 85 Providing guideline principles: Botany and ecology within the State Forest Service of New Zealand during the 1920s Anton Sveding 113 ‘Zambesi seeds from Mr Moffat’: Sir George Grey as imperial botanist John O’Leary 129 INTRODUCTION JAMES BEATTIE Victoria University of Wellington; Research Associate Centre for Environmental History The Australian National University; Senior Research Associate Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg This first issue of 2019 speaks to the many exciting dimensions of environmental history. Represented here is environmental history’s great breadth, in terms of geographical scope (Brazil, the Atlantic world, Europe, global, Africa and New Zealand); topics (animal studies, biography, climatological analysis, energy and waste); and temporal span (from the early modern to the contemporary period). The first article, ‘Nature’s revenge: War on the wilderness during the opening of Brazil’s “Last Western Frontier”’, explores the ongoing trope of the frontier and ‘frontiersman’ in the environmental history of twentieth-century Amazonia, Brazil. The author, Sandro Dutra e Silva, does so by skilfully analysing the creation of the heroic image of the road-building engineer Bernardo Sayão, and his deployment by the state to underpin its aims of developing Amazonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Podocarpus Totara
    Mike Marden and Chris Phillips [email protected] TTotaraotara Podocarpus totara INTRODUCTION AND METHODS Reasons for planting native trees include the enhancement of plant and animal biodiversity for conservation, establishment of a native cover on erosion-prone sites, improvement of water quality by revegetation of riparian areas and management for production of high quality timber. Signifi cant areas of the New Zealand landscape, both urban and rural, are being re-vegetated using native species. Many such plantings are on open sites where the aim is to quickly achieve canopy closure and often includes the planting of a mixture of shrubs and tree species concurrently. Previously, data have been presented showing the potential above- and below-ground growth performance of eleven native plant species considered typical early colonisers of bare ground, particularly in riparian areas (http://icm.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/land/Trial1results.asp). In this current series of posters we present data on the growth performance of six native conifer (kauri, rimu, totara, matai, miro, kahikatea) and two broadleaved hardwood (puriri, titoki) species most likely to succeed the early colonising species to become a major component in mature stands of indigenous forest (http://icm.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/land/ Trial2.asp). Data on the potential above- and below-ground early growth performance of colonising shrubby species together with that of conifer and broadleaved species will help land managers and community groups involved in re-vegetation projects in deciding the plant spacing and species mix most appropriate for the scale of planting and best suited to site conditions. Data are from a trial established in 2006 to assess the relative growth performance of native conifer and broadleaved hardwood tree species.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Beeches : Establishment, Growth and Management / Mark Smale, David Bergin and Greg Steward, Photography by Ian Platt
    Mark Smale, David K ....,.,. and Greg ~t:~·wa11.r Photography by lan P Reproduction of material in this Bulletin for non-commercial purposes is welcomed, providing there is appropriate acknowledgment of its source. To obtain further copies of this publication, or for information about other publications, please contact: Publications Officer Private Bag 3020 Rotorua New Zealand Telephone: +64 7 343 5899 Fac.rimile: +64 7 348 0952 E-nraif. publications@scionresearch .com !Pebsite: www.scionresearch.com National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication data The New Zealand beeches : establishment, growth and management / Mark Smale, David Bergin and Greg Steward, Photography by Ian Platt. (New Zealand Indigenous Tree Bulletin, 1176-2632; no.6) Includes bibliographic references. 978-0-478-11018-0 1. trees. 2. Forest management-New Zealand. 3. Forests and forestry-New Zealand. 1. Smale, Mark, 1954- ll. Bergin, David, 1954- ill. Steward, Greg, 1961- IV. Series. V. New Zealand Forese Research Institute. 634.90993-dc 22 lSSN 1176-2632 ISBN 978-0-478-11038-3 ©New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited 2012 Production Team Teresa McConcbie, Natural Talent Design - design and layout Ian Platt- photography Sarah Davies, Richard Moberly, Scion - printing and production Paul Charters - editing DISCLAIMER In producing this Bulletin reasonable care has been taAren lo mmre tbat all statements represent the best infornJation available. Ht~~vever, tbe contents of this pt1blicatio11 are not i11tended to be a substitute for s,Pecific specialist advice on at!} matter and should not be relied on for that pury~ose. NEW ZEALAND FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE L!JWJTED mtd its emplqyees shall not be liable on at.ry ground for a'!)l lost, damage, or liabili!J inrorred as a direct or indirect result of at!J reliance l{y a'!)l person upon informatiou contained or opinions expressed in this tvork.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Before We Humans Were and Their Relatives Will Probably Be Here When We Are Gone
    The ‘mighty tōtara’ is one of our most extraordinary trees. Among the biggest and oldest trees in the New Zealand forest, the heart of Māori carving and culture, trailing no. 8 wire as fence posts on settler farms, clambered up in the Pureora protests of the 1980s: the story of New Zealand can be told through tōtara. Simpson tells that story like nobody else could. In words and pictures, through waka and leaves, farmers and carvers, he takes us deep inside the trees: their botany and evolution, their role in Māori life and lore, their uses by Pākehā, and their current status in our environment and culture. By doing so, Simpson illuminates the natural world and the story of Māori and Pākehā in this country. Our largest trees, the kauri Tāne Mahuta and the tōtara Pouakani, are both thought to be around 1000 years old. They were here before we humans were and their relatives will probably be here when we are gone. Tōtara has been central to life in this country for thousands of years. This book tells a great tree’s story, and that is our story too. Philip Simpson is a botanist and author of Dancing Leaves: The Story of New Zealand’s Cabbage Tree, Tī Kōuka (Canterbury University Press, 2000) and Pōhutukawa and Rātā: New Zealand’s Iron-hearted Trees (Te Papa Press, 2005). Both books won Montana Book Awards in the Environment category and Pōhutukawa and Rātā also won the Montana Medal for best non-fiction book. Simpson is unique in his ability to combine the scientific expertise of the trained botanist with a writer’s ability to understand the history of Māori and Pākehā interactions with the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Assessment of Radiata Pine, Rimu, and Mānuka
    Pizzirani et al. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science (2019) 49:5 https://doi.org/10.33494/nzjfs492019x44x E-ISSN: 1179-5395 Published on-line: 20 June 2019 Research Article Open Access New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science Exploring forestry options with Māori landowners: an economic assessment of radiata pine, rimu, and mānuka Stefania Pizzirani*1,2,3, Juan J. Monge1, Peter Hall1, Gregory A. Steward1, Les Dowling1, Phil Caskey4, Sarah J. McLaren2,3 1 Scion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua, 3046, New Zealand 2 Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand 3 New Zealand Life Cycle Management Centre, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand 4 New Zealand Mānuka Group, 525b State Highway 30, Awakeri, Whakatane, 3191, New Zealand *corresponding author: Stefania Pizzirani: [email protected] (Received for publication 9 November 2017; accepted in revised form 6 May 2019) Abstract Background: A quarter of New Zealand’s land area is currently covered in indigenous forest although only indigenous forests on private land can be harvested. In addition, planted exotic forests (~90% Pinus radiata D.Don) cover a further 7% of the land, and these form the main basis of New Zealand’s forestry industry. However, some landowners are seeking to plant a more diverse range of species (including New Zealand indigenous species) that can be managed in different ways to produce a range of products. Methods: A “cradle-to-gate” life cycle-based economic assessment of three forestry scenarios was undertaken in (i.e. intensive management of radiata pine); (2) continuous-cover forestry management of the indigenous coniferous tree speciescollaboration rimu ( withDacrydium members cupressinum of Ngāti Porou, Lamb.); an and indigenous (3) intensive Māori production-scale tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened and Unique Biodiversity Assets of Auckland
    Threatened and unique biodiversity assets of Auckland August 2013 Authors: John Sawyer and Abigail Forbes Natural Heritage Auckland Council Contact email: [email protected] Contents 1.0 Introduction and Purpose The Auckland region stretches from the Awhitu Peninsula in the south, east to the Hunua Range, to the Hauraki Gulf Islands (including Waiheke, Great Barrier Island and Tiritiri Matenga) and north to the dunes of Te Arai and west to the Tapora Peninsula and the Kaipara Harbour. The region makes up only 2 per cent of New Zealand’s total land mass, yet it is an important reservoir of New Zealand’s indigenous biodiversity. However, since human settlement there has been a marked decline in the region’s terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity. This decline has occurred through the loss and fragmentation of native ecosystems due to human settlement and consequent land use changes, combined with the introduction of various invasive species, overharvesting and pollution. In addition, climate change, and those activities aimed at mitigating its effects, are now emerging as significant potential threats to biodiversity (Auckland Regional Council, 2010, McGlone and Walker 2011). Auckland Council has obligations to provide for the protection of biodiversity in the Auckland region, including areas of significant indigenous vegetation and significant habitats of indigenous fauna under national legislation as well as its own statutory and non-statutory plans. This work is a matter of national importance for local government under the Resource Management Act 1991 (Section 6c). The Act also requires maintenance of indigenous biological diversity (Section 31) and for the potential of natural [biological diversity] resources to meet the reasonably foreseeable needs of future generations to be sustained (Section 5).
    [Show full text]
  • NZ BOT SOC No 111 March 2013
    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 111 March 2013 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Anthony Wright Secretary/Treasurer: Ewen Cameron Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8013 URL: www.nzbotanicalsociety.org.nz Subscriptions The 2013 ordinary and institutional subscriptions are $25 (reduced to $18 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2012 student subscription, available to full-time students, is $12 (reduced to $9 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $7.00 each. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28 February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next years subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the June 2013 issue is 25 May 2013. Please post contributions to: Lara Shepherd Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa 169 Tory St Wellington 6021 Send email contributions to [email protected]. Files are preferably in MS Word, as an open text document (Open Office document with suffix “.odt”) or saved as RTF or ASCII. Macintosh files can also be accepted. Graphics can be sent as TIF JPG, or BMP files; please do not embed images into documents.
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated List of Species Used in Tree-Ring Research
    TREE-RING BULLETIN, Vol. 53, 1993 AN UPDATED LIST OF SPECIES USED IN TREE-RING RESEARCH HENRI D. GRISSINO-MAYER Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721, U.S.A. ABSTRACT During the past 100 years, researchers have investigated the potential of hundreds of tree and shrub species for use in applications of tree-ring research. Although several lists of species known to crossdate have been published, investigated species that do not crossdate are rarely included despite the usefulness of this infonnation for future research. This paper provides a list of the Latin and common names of 573 species that have been investigated in tree-ring research, infor­ mation on species known to crossdate, and information on species with measurement and/or chronology data in the International Tree-Ring Data Bank. In addition, a measure of the suitability of a species for future tree-ring applications, the Crossdating Index (CDI), is developed and pro­ posed for standard usage. 1n den letzten hundert J ahren haben Forscher das Potential von hunderten von Baum- und Buscharten fi.ir die Anwendung in der Jahresring-Forschung untersucht. Zahlreiche Listen mit Arten, von denen man wei~, da~ sie zeitlich korrespondieren, sind bereits veroffentlicht worden, dagegen sind untersuchte Arten, die nicht zeitlich korresponclieren, selten in Publikationen beriick­ sichtigt worden, obwohl diese Informationen fi.ir die kiinftige Forschung nutzvoll sein konnten. Dieser Artikel legt eine Liste der lateinischen und der gemeinen Narnen von 573 Arten vor, die im Rahmen der Jahresring-Forschung untersucht worden sind, Inforrnationen Uber Arten, die bekan­ nterweise zeitlich korrespondieren sowie Informationen iiber Arten mit Ma~- und/oder Chronologiedaten in der intemationalen Jahresring-Datenbank (International Tree-Ring Data Bank).
    [Show full text]
  • Totara Cover Front
    DISCLAIMER In producing this Bulletin reasonable care has been taken to ensure that all statements represent the best information available. However, the contents of this publication are not intended to be a substitute for specific specialist advice on any matter and should not be relied on for that purpose. NEW ZEALAND FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE LIMITED and its employees shall not be liable on any ground for any loss, damage, or liability incurred as a direct or indirect result of any reliance by any person upon information contained or opinions expressed in this work. To obtain further copies of this publication, or for information about Forest Research publications, please contact: Publications Officer Forest Research Private Bag 3020 Rotorua New Zealand telephone: +64 7 343 5899 facsimile: +64 7 343 5897 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.forestresearch.co.nz National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication data Bergin, D.O. (David O.) Totara establishment, growth, and management / David Bergin. (New Zealand Indigenous Tree Bulletin, 1176-2632; No.1) Includes bibliographic references. ISBN 0-478-11008-1 1. Podocarpus—New Zealand. 2. Forest management—New Zealand. I. New Zealand Forest Research Institute. II. Title. 585.3—dc 21 Production Team Jonathan Barran — photography Teresa McConchie — layout design John Smith — graphics Ruth Gadgil — technical editing Judy Griffith — editing and layout ISSN 1176-2632 ISBN 0-478-11008-1 © New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited 2003 Front cover insert: Emergent totara and younger trees along the forest edge in Pureora Forest Park, with mixed shrub species edging the picnic area in the foreground.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Scheduled Trees
    No Address Legal Description Description 75 Mesopotamia School Pt RS 2750 & Pt RS 4037 Pseudotsuga menziesii (2 Douglas Fir) 90 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Fagus sylvatica "Purpurea" (Copper Beech) 91 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Hoheria angustifolia (Houhi Puruhi) 92 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Eucalyptus viminalis (Manna Gum) 93 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Eucalyptus viminalis (Manna Gum) 94 52 Rae Rd Lot 1 DP 2842 Podocarpus totara "Pendula" (Weeping Totara) 95 Sowerby Rd RS 38936 Fagus sylvatica "Purpurea" (Copper Beech) 90 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Fagus sylvatica "Purpurea" (Copper Beech) 91 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Hoheria angustifolia (Houhi Puruhi) 92 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Eucalyptus viminalis (Manna Gum) 93 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Eucalyptus viminalis (Manna Gum) 94 52 Rae Rd Lot 1 DP 2842 Podocarpus totara "Pendula" (Weeping Totara) 95 Sowerby Rd RS 38936 Fagus sylvatica "Purpurea" (Copper Beech) 98 School Rd Lot 1 DP 7033 Nothofagus solandri var Cliffordiodes (Mountain Beech) 99 Raincliff Rd Pt RS 20125 & Pt RS Juglans regia (Walnut) 21148 102 Winchester-Hanging River Bed Sophora microphylla (Kowhai) Rock Rd 100 Railway Main South Railway Quercus robur, Fraxinus excelsior, Eucalyptus (Common Oak, Ash and Gums) 101 Railway Main South Railway Quercus robur, Fraxinus excelsior, Eucalyptus spp (Common Oak, Ash and Gums) 110 Station Rd Lot 1 DP 23188 Pinus radiata & Cupressus macrocarpa (Monterey Pines & Monterey Cypress) 100 Railway Main South Railway Quercus robur, Fraxinus excelsior, Eucalyptus (Common Oak, Ash
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Cavitation Resistance in Conifers Maximilian Larter
    The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers Maximilian Larter To cite this version: Maximilian Larter. The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers. Bioclimatology. Univer- sit´ede Bordeaux, 2016. English. <NNT : 2016BORD0103>. <tel-01375936> HAL Id: tel-01375936 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01375936 Submitted on 3 Oct 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. THESE Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITE DE BORDEAUX Spécialité : Ecologie évolutive, fonctionnelle et des communautés Ecole doctorale: Sciences et Environnements Evolution de la résistance à la cavitation chez les conifères The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers Maximilian LARTER Directeur : Sylvain DELZON (DR INRA) Co-Directeur : Jean-Christophe DOMEC (Professeur, BSA) Soutenue le 22/07/2016 Devant le jury composé de : Rapporteurs : Mme Amy ZANNE, Prof., George Washington University Mr Jordi MARTINEZ VILALTA, Prof., Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona Examinateurs : Mme Lisa WINGATE, CR INRA, UMR ISPA, Bordeaux Mr Jérôme CHAVE, DR CNRS, UMR EDB, Toulouse i ii Abstract Title: The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers Abstract Forests worldwide are at increased risk of widespread mortality due to intense drought under current and future climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • IAWA List of Microscopic Features for Softwood Identification 1
    IAWA List of microscopic features for softwood identification 1 IAWA LIST OF MICROSCOPIC FEATURES FOR SOFTWOOD IDENTIFICATION IAWA Committee Pieter Baas – Leiden, The Netherlands Nadezhda Blokhina – Vladivostok, Russia Tomoyuki Fujii – Ibaraki, Japan Peter Gasson – Kew, UK Dietger Grosser – Munich, Germany Immo Heinz – Munich, Germany Jugo Ilic – South Clayton, Australia Jiang Xiaomei – Beijing, China Regis Miller – Madison, WI, USA Lee Ann Newsom – University Park, PA, USA Shuichi Noshiro – Ibaraki, Japan Hans Georg Richter – Hamburg, Germany Mitsuo Suzuki – Sendai, Japan Teresa Terrazas – Montecillo, Mexico Elisabeth Wheeler – Raleigh, NC, USA Alex Wiedenhoeft – Madison, WI, USA Edited by H.G. Richter, D. Grosser, I. Heinz & P.E. Gasson © 2004. IAWA Journal 25 (1): 1–70 Published for the International Association of Wood Anatomists at the Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden, The Netherlands 2 IAWA Journal, Vol. 25 (1), 2004 IAWA List of microscopic features for softwood identification 3 2 IAWA Journal, Vol. 25 (1), 2004 IAWA List of microscopic features for softwood identification 3 PREFACE A definitive list of anatomical features of softwoods has long been needed. The hard- wood list (IAWA Committee 1989) has been adopted throughout the world, not least because it provides a succinct, unambiguous illustrated glossary of hardwood charac- ters that can be used for a variety of purposes, not just identification. This publication is intended to do the same job for softwoods. Identifying softwoods relies on careful observation of a number of subtle characters, and great care has been taken to show high quality photomicrographs that remove most of the ambiguity that definitions alone would provide. Unlike the Hardwood Committee, the Softwood Committee never met in its full com- position.
    [Show full text]