Conductance Viewed As Transmission

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conductance Viewed As Transmission Conductance viewed as transmission Yoseph Imry Department of Condensed Matter Physics, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76 100, Israel Rolf Landauer IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598 Electric current flow, in transport theory, has usually been viewed as the response to an applied electric field. Alternatively, current flow can be viewed as a consequence of the injection of carriers at contacts and their probability of reaching the other end. This approach has proven to be particularly useful for the small samples made by modern microelectronic techniques. The approach, some of its results, and related issues are described, but without an attempt to cover all the active subtopics in this field. [S0034-6861(99)00102-6] CONTENTS essential to take the interfaces into account. Mesoscopic physics, concerned with samples that are intermediate in I. Conductance Calculated from Transmission S306 size between the atomic scale and the macroscopic one, II. Spatial Variation, Conductance Fluctuations, can now demonstrate in manufactured structures much Localization S308 of the quantum mechanics we associate with atoms and III. Electron Interactions S310 molecules. IV. Electron Coherence; Persistent Currents; Other When scattering by a randomly placed set of point Features S311 defects was under consideration, it quickly became cus- Acknowledgments S312 References S312 tomary in resistance calculations to evaluate the resis- tance after averaging over an ensemble of all possible defect placements. This removed the effects of I. CONDUCTANCE CALCULATED FROM TRANSMISSION quantum-mechanically coherent multiple scattering, which depends on the distance between the scatterers. Early quantum theories of electrical conduction were This approach also made the unwarranted assumption semiclassical. Electrons were accelerated according to that the variation of resistance between ensemble mem- Bloch’s theorem; this was balanced by back scattering bers was small. The approach made it impossible to ask due to phonons and lattice defects. Cross sections for about spatial variations of field and current within the scattering, and band structures, were calculated sample. Unfortunately, as a result, the very existence of quantum-mechanically, but the balancing process al- such questions, which distinguish between the ensemble lowed only for occupation probabilities, not permitting a average and the behavior of a particular sample, was totally coherent process. Also, in most instances, scatter- ignored. ers at separate locations were presumed to act incoher- Electron transport theory has typically viewed the ently. Totally quantum-mechanical theories stem from electric field as a cause and the current flow as a re- the 1950s, and have diverse sources. Particularly intense sponse. Circuit theory has had a broader approach, concern with the need for more quantum mechanical treating voltage sources and current sources on an equal approaches was manifested in Japan, and Kubo’s formu- footing. The approach to be emphasized in the following lation became the most widely accepted version. Quan- discussion is a generalization of the circuit theory alter- tum theory, as described by the Schro¨ dinger equation, is native: Transport is a result of the carrier flow incident a theory of conservative systems, and does not allow for on the sample boundaries. The voltage distribution dissipation. The Schro¨ dinger equation readily allows us within the sample results from the self-consistent pileup to calculate polarizability for atoms, molecules, or other of carriers. isolated systems that do not permit electrons to enter or The viewpoint stressed in this short note has been ex- leave. Kubo’s linear-response theory is essentially an ex- plained in much more detail in books and review papers. tended theory of polarizability. Some supplementary We can cite only a few: Beenakker and van Houten handwaving is needed to calculate a dissipative effect (1991), Datta (1995), Ferry and Goodnick (1997), Imry such as conductance, for a sample with boundaries (1997). There are also many conference proceedings and where electrons enter and leave (Anderson, 1997). After special theme volumes related to this subject, e.g., Sohn all, no theory that ignores the interfaces of a sample to et al., 1997; Datta, 1998. the rest of its circuit can possibly calculate the resistance It seems obvious that the ease with which carriers of such a sample of limited extent. Modern microelec- penetrate through a sample should be closely related to tronics has provided the techniques for fabricating very its conductance. But this is a viewpoint that, with the small samples. These permit us to study conductance in exception of some highly specialized limiting cases, cases where the carriers have a totally quantum me- found slow acceptance. That the conductance of a single chanically coherent history within the sample, making it localized tunneling barrier, with a very small transmis- S306 Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 71, No. 2, Centenary 1999 0034-6861/99/71(2)/306(7)/$16.40 ©1999 The American Physical Society Imry and Landauer: Conductance viewed as transmission S307 fied in Eq. (1.2) occurs at the connections to the reser- voir (Imry, 1986). Consider the left reservoir. Deep in- side that reservoir there is a thermal equilibrium population. In the 1D channel only the right-moving electrons are present. The effective Fermi-level, or ef- fective electrochemical potential, measures the level to which electrons are occupied. At point P in Fig. 1, deep FIG. 1. Two reservoirs on each side of a perfect tube, at dif- inside the left-hand reservoir, the electron distribution is ferent electrochemical potentials m1 and m2 . P is well inside that characteristic of thermal equilibrium with the Fermi reservoir 1; Q is in its entrance. level m1 . At point Q in Fig. 1, in the tapered part of the connection, the electron population shows some effect sion probability, is proportional to that probability was of the lowered density of electrons which have come out understood in the early 1930s (Landauer, 1994). In the of the right hand reservoir with electrochemical poten- case of a simple tunneling barrier it has always been tial m2 . Thus there is a potential difference between P apparent that the potential drop across the barrier is and Q. Along the ideal one-dimensional channel the localized to the immediate vicinity of the barrier and not electron population is equally controlled by both reser- distributed over a region of the order of the mean free voirs, and the electrochemical potential there must be path in the surrounding medium. The implicit accep- 1 2 (m11m2). Therefore the voltage drop specified by Eq. tance of a highly localized voltage drop across a single (1.2) is divided equally between the two tapered connec- barrier did not, however, readily lead to a broader ap- tors. The physics we have just discussed is essential. preciation of spatially inhomogeneous transport fields in Conductance can only be calculated after specifying the the presence of other types of scattering. The localized location where the potential is determined. The voltage voltage drop across a barrier has been demonstrated specification deep inside the reservoir and the geometri- with modern scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) cal spreading, are essential aspects of the derivation of probing methods (Briner et al., 1996). We return to spa- Eq. (1.2). Unfortunately, supposed derivations that ig- tial variations in Sec. II. nore these geometrical aspects are common in the litera- Figure 1 shows an ideal conducting channel with no ture. irregularities or scattering mechanisms along its length. If we insert an obstacle into the channel, which trans- A long perfect tube is tied to two large reservoirs via mits with probability T, the current will be reduced ac- adiabatically tapered nonreflecting connectors. Carriers cordingly, and we find approaching a reservoir pass into that reservoir with cer- 2 tainty. The reservoirs are the electronic equivalent of a G5~e /p\!T. (1.3) radiative blackbody; the electrons coming out of a res- Note that it does not matter whether the T in Eq. (1.3) is ervoir are occupied according to the Fermi distribution determined by a single highly localized barrier or by a that characterizes the deep interior of that reservoir. As- more extended and complex potential profile. Expres- sume, initially, that the tube is narrow enough so that sions for the conductance with this same current, but only the lowest of the transverse eigenstates in the chan- with the potential measured within the narrow channel, nel has its energy below the Fermi level. That makes the on the two sides of the obstacle, also exist (Sec. 2.2 of channel effectively one-dimensional. Take the zero tem- Datta, 1995; Sec. 1.2.1 of Ferry and Goodnick, 1997, perature case and let the left reservoir be filled to up to Chap. 5 of Imry, 1997). If, in that case, the potential is level m1 , higher than that of the right-hand reservoir, averaged over a region long enough to remove interfer- m2 . Then in the range between m1 and m2 we have fully ence oscillations, then T in Eq. (1.3) is replaced by occupied states pouring from left to right. Thus the cur- T/(12T). rent is The preceding discussion can easily be generalized to a channel that involves more than one transverse eigen- j52~m12m2!ev~dn/dm!, (1.1) state with energy below the Fermi level (Imry, 1986). In where dn/dm is the density of states (allowing for spin that case we utilize the transmission matrix t of the scat- degeneracy) and v is the velocity component along the tering obstacle, which specifies the transmitted wave tube at the Fermi surface. Now (m12m2)52e(V1 functions relative to the incident wave, utilizing the 2V2), where V is a voltage and e the magnitude of the transverse eigenstates of the channel as a basis.
Recommended publications
  • 2018 March Meeting Program Guide
    MARCHMEETING2018 LOS ANGELES MARCH 5-9 PROGRAM GUIDE #apsmarch aps.org/meetingapp aps.org/meetings/march Senior Editor: Arup Chakraborty Robert T. Haslam Professor of Chemical Engineering; Professor of Chemistry, Physics, and Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, MIT Now welcoming submissions in the Physics of Living Systems Submit your best work at elifesci.org/physics-living-systems Image: D. Bonazzi (CC BY 2.0) Led by Senior Editor Arup Chakraborty, this dedicated new section of the open-access journal eLife welcomes studies in which experimental, theoretical, and computational approaches rooted in the physical sciences are developed and/or applied to provide deep insights into the collective properties and function of multicomponent biological systems and processes. eLife publishes groundbreaking research in the life and biomedical sciences. All decisions are made by working scientists. WELCOME t is a pleasure to welcome you to Los Angeles and to the APS March I Meeting 2018. As has become a tradition, the March Meeting is a spectacular gathering of an enthusiastic group of scientists from diverse organizations and backgrounds who have broad interests in physics. This meeting provides us an opportunity to present exciting new work as well as to learn from others, and to meet up with colleagues and make new friends. While you are here, I encourage you to take every opportunity to experience the amazing science that envelops us at the meeting, and to enjoy the many additional professional and social gatherings offered. Additionally, this is a year for Strategic Planning for APS, when the membership will consider the evolving mission of APS and where we want to go as a society.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1509 Edited by G
    Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1509 Edited by G. Goos, J. Hartmanis and J. van Leeuwen 3 Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo Colin P. Williams (Ed.) Quantum Computing and Quantum Communications First NASA International Conference, QCQC’98 Palm Springs, California, USA February 17-20, 1998 Selected Papers 13 Series Editors Gerhard Goos, Karlsruhe University, Germany Juris Hartmanis, Cornell University, NY, USA Jan van Leeuwen, Utrecht University, The Netherlands Volume Editor Colin P. Williams Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Quantum Algorithms and Technologies Group Information and Computing Technologies Research Section Mail Stop 126-347, Pasadena, CA 91109-8099, USA E-mail: [email protected] Cataloging-in-Publication data applied for Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Quantum computing and quantum communications : first NASA international conference ; selected papers / QCQC’98, Palm Springs, California, USA, February 17 - 20, 1998. Colin P. Williams (ed.). - Berlin ; Heidelberg ; New York ; Barcelona ; Hong Kong ; London ; Milan ; Paris ; Singapore ; Tokyo : Springer, 1999 (Lecture notes in computer science ; Vol. 1509) ISBN 3-540-65514-X CR Subject Classification (1998): F.1, E.3, E.4, F.2 ISSN 0302-9743 ISBN 3-540-65514-X Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer-Verlag.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1602.01655V2 [Cond-Mat.Mes-Hall] 25 Apr 2016 Which Is Often Smaller Than 1
    (Pat. pending, to appear in Comptes Rendus) . Linear and Nonlinear Mesoscopic Thermoelectric Transport with Coupling to Heat Baths Jian-Hua Jiang1, ∗ and Yoseph Imry2, y 1School of Physical Science and Technology, Soochow University, 1 Shizi Street, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China 2Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel (Dated: September 25, 2018) Decades of research on thermoelectrics stimulated by the fact that nano- and meso-scale ther- moelectric transport could yield higher energy conversion efficiency and output power has recently uncovered a new direction on inelastic thermoelectric effects. We introduce the history, motivation, and perspectives on mesoscopic inelastic thermoelectric effects. I. INTRODUCTION found lately to be less effective as, for example, the out- put power is suppressed in the zero band width limit[3] Research on the science and technology of thermo- due to, e,g., suppressed electrical conductivity[4]. electric phenomenon has a long history since its dis- Alongside with those developments, the scientific com- covery almost two centuries ago[1]. The modern the- munity was pursuing a better understanding of (charge) ory for thermoelectric transport in bulk semiconductors transport in nano- and meso-scale systems, localization was established, with the help of energy band theory and phenomena, and strongly interacting electron systems. semi-classical transport theory, in the middle of the last These studies activated research on thermoelectric trans- century[1]. The key concepts such as the figure of merit port in non-standard (including bulk) semiconductors, and the power factor were introduced then, which facili- which is still ongoing[5]. The most influential studies are tated and stimulated many theoretical and experimental based on two seminal works by Hicks and Dresselhaus[6], studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Rolf Landauer Was Born in Stuttgart, Germany, to Karl and Anna Landauer on February 4, 1927
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES R O L F W . L ANDAUE R 1 9 2 7 — 1 9 9 9 A Biographical Memoir by CHA R LES H. BENNETT AND ALAN B. FO W LE R Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2009 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. ROLF W. LANDAUER February 4, 1927–April 27, 1999 BY CHARLES H . BENNETT AND ALAN B . FO W LE R OLF W. LANDAUER IS REMEMBERED for wide-ranging contri- Rbutions to mesoscopic condensed matter and statistical physics, especially the theory of conductivity of disordered media (as described by Landauer’s formula) and for discov- ering the fundamental law (Landauer’s principle) governing the thermodynamics of information processing by physical systems. He is also remembered as an outstanding scientific and technical manager of IBM’s Watson Research Laboratory, guiding it from relative obscurity to become by 1970 one of the world’s two most important and innovative engineering and scientific laboratories. Rolf Landauer was born in Stuttgart, Germany, to Karl and Anna Landauer on February 4, 1927. Until Hitler had consolidated power Rolf lived in a prosperous, assimilated Jewish family. His father, a successful architect and builder, had been severely wounded while serving the kaiser in the First World War, in which he earned an Iron Cross, and was an ardent German nationalist. He eventually died of war wounds in 194, after Hitler’s accession to power, still believing that Nazi rule was just a temporary aberration.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Prize
    Year Winner Discipline 1953 Gedaliah Alon Jewish studies 1953 Haim Hazaz literature 1953 Ya'akov Cohen literature 1953 Dina Feitelson-Schur education 1953 Mark Dvorzhetski social science 1953 Lipman Heilprin medical science 1953 Zeev Ben-Zvi sculpture 1953 Shimshon Amitsur exact sciences 1953 Jacob Levitzki exact sciences 1954 Moshe Zvi Segal Jewish studies 1954 Schmuel Hugo Bergmann humanities 1954 David Shimoni literature 1954 Shmuel Yosef Agnon literature 1954 Arthur Biram education 1954 Gad Tedeschi jurisprudence 1954 Franz Ollendorff exact sciences 1954 Michael Zohary life sciences 1954 Shimon Fritz Bodenheimer agriculture 1955 Ödön Pártos music 1955 Ephraim Urbach Jewish studies 1955 Isaac Heinemann Jewish studies 1955 Zalman Shneur literature 1955 Yitzhak Lamdan literature 1955 Michael Fekete exact sciences 1955 Israel Reichart life sciences 1955 Yaakov Ben-Tor life sciences 1955 Akiva Vroman life sciences 1955 Benjamin Shapira medical science 1955 Sara Hestrin-Lerner medical science 1955 Netanel Hochberg agriculture 1956 Zahara Schatz painting and sculpture 1956 Naftali Herz Tur-Sinai Jewish studies 1956 Yigael Yadin Jewish studies 1956 Yehezkel Abramsky Rabbinical literature 1956 Gershon Shufman literature 1956 Miriam Yalan-Shteklis children's literature 1956 Nechama Leibowitz education 1956 Yaakov Talmon social sciences 1956 Avraham HaLevi Frankel exact sciences 1956 Manfred Aschner life sciences 1956 Haim Ernst Wertheimer medicine 1957 Hanna Rovina theatre 1957 Haim Shirman Jewish studies 1957 Yohanan Levi humanities 1957 Yaakov
    [Show full text]
  • Author Index to Volumes 68–72, 1996–2000
    AUTHOR INDEX TO VOLUMES 68–72, 1996–2000 A Balbus, Steven A. — Instability, turbulence, and enhanced transport in accretion disks. — Steven A. Balbus and Abney, Mark — see Lidsey, James E., 69 ͑2͒, 373-410 ͑1997͒. John F. Hawley; 70 ͑1͒, 1-53 ͑1998͒. Abramowicz, Halina — HERA collider physics. — Baldwin, George C. — Recoilless gamma-ray lasers. — George Halina Abramowicz and Allen C. Caldwell; 71 ͑5͒, C. Baldwin and Johndale C. Solem; 69 ͑4͒, 1275-409 ͑1999͒. 1085-117 ͑1997͒. Acharyya, Muktish — see Chakrabarti, Bikas K., 71 ͑3͒, Banavar, Jayanth R. — see Marsili, Matteo, 68 ͑4͒, 847-59 ͑1999͒. 963-83 ͑1996͒. Adams, Fred C. — A dying universe: the long-term fate and Bankoff, S. George — see Oron, Alexander, 69 ͑3͒, evolution of astrophysical objects. — Fred C. Adams 931-80 ͑1997͒. and Gregory Laughlin; 69 ͑2͒, 337-72 ͑1997͒. Barnes, Charles A. — see Wallerstein, George, 69 ͑4͒, Adelberger, Eric G. — Solar fusion cross sections. — Eric G. 995-1084 ͑1997͒. Adelberger, Sam M. Austin, John N. Bahcall, A. B. Barnett, R. M. — Particle physics summary. — R. M. Barnett, Balantekin, Gilles Bogaert, Lowell S. Brown, Lothar C. D. Carone, D. E. Groom, T. G. Trippe, C. G. Wohl, B. Buchmann, F. Edward Cecil, Arthur E. Champagne, Ludwig de Armstrong, P. S. Gee, G. S. Wagman, F. James, M. Mangano, Braeckeleer, Charles A. Duba, Steven R. Elliott, Stuart J. K. Mo¨nig, L. Montanet, J. L. Feng, H. Murayama, J. J. Freedman, Moshe Gai, G. Goldring, Christopher R. Gould, Herna´ndez, A. Manohar, M. Aguilar-Benitez, C. Caso, R. L. Andrei Gruzinov, Wick C. Haxton, Karsten M.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Activities 2002
    Scientific Activities 2002 Rehovot, Israel Edited, Designed and Typeset by Aviva Ovadia Cover Design by Shoshana Zioni, Graphics Department We wish to thank all the secretarial staff who worked on this project, without whose help this publication would not be possible. Printed in Israel By Publishing Department Weizmann Institute of Science ISSN 0083-7849 Contents Board of Governors vii Scientific and Academic Advisory Committee xv Officers of the Weizmann Institute xvii Weizmann Institute of Science xix Faculty of Biochemistry Faculty of Biochemistry - Overview 3 Biological Chemistry 5 Molecular Genetics 13 Plant Sciences 21 Biological Services 27 Avron-Wilstätter Minerva Center for Research in Photosynthesis 29 Y. Leon Benoziyo Institute for Molecular Medicine 31 Dr. Josef Cohn Minerva Center for Biomembrane Research 33 Crown Human Genome Center 35 Mel Dobrin Center for Nutrition 37 Leo and Julia Forchheimer Center for Molecular Genetics 39 Kekst Family Center for Medical Genetics 41 Charles W. and Tillie K. Lubin Center for Plant Biotechnology 43 M.D. Moross Institute for Cancer Research 45 David and Fela Shapell Family Center for Genetic Disorders Research 47 Harry and Jeannette Weinberg Center for Plant Molecular Genetics Research 49 Faculty of Biology Faculty of Biology - Overview 53 Biological Regulation 55 Immunology 61 Molecular Cell Biology 69 Neurobiology 83 Veterinary Resources 89 Helen and Norman Asher Center for Human Brain Imaging 91 Nella and Leon Benoziyo Center for Neurosciences 93 Carl and Micaela Einhorn-Dominic Institute for Brain Research 95 Murray H. and Meyer Grodetsky Center for Research of Higher Brain Functions 97 Robert Koch-Minerva Center for Research in Autoimmune Diseases 99 Belle S.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Reviews of Modern Physics Volume 71 Special issue 1999 FOREWORD Martin Blume PREFACE Benjamin Bederson INTRODUCTION Hans A. Bethe HISTORIC PERSPECTIVES—personal essays on historic developments This section presents articles describing historic developments in a number of major areas of physics, prepared by authors who played important roles in these developments. The section was organized and coordinated with the help of Peter Galison, professor of the History of Science at Harvard University. S1 Quantum theory Hans A. Bethe S6 Nuclear physics Hans A. Bethe S16 Theoretical particle physics A. Pais S25 Elementary particle physics: The origins Val L. Fitch S33 Astrophysics George Field S41 A century of relativity Irwin I. Shapiro S54 From radar to nuclear magnetic resonance Robert V. Pound S59 An essay on condensed matter physics in the twentieth W. Kohn century S78 A short history of atomic physics in the twentieth century Daniel Kleppner PARTICLE PHYSICS AND RELATED TOPICS S85 Quantum field theory Frank Wilczek S96 The standard model of particle physics Mary K. Gaillard Paul D. Grannis Frank J. Sciulli S112 String theory, supersymmetry, unification, and all that John H. Schwarz Nathan Seiberg S121 Accelerators and detectors W. K. H. Panofsky M. Breidenbach S133 Anomalous g values of the electron and muon V. W. Hughes T. Kinoshita S140 Neutrino physics L. Wolfenstein ASTROPHYSICS S145 Cosmology at the millennium Michael S. Turner J. Anthony Tyson S165 Cosmic rays: the most energetic particles in the universe James W. Cronin S173 Cosmic microwave background radiation Lyman Page David Wilkinson S180 Black holes Gary T. Horowitz Saul A. Teukolsky S187 Gravitational radiation Rainer Weiss S197 Deciphering the nature of dark matter Bernard Sadoulet NUCLEAR PHYSICS S205 Nuclear physics at the end of the century E.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial Tributes: Volume 9
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/10094 SHARE Memorial Tributes: Volume 9 DETAILS 326 pages | 6 x 9 | HARDBACK ISBN 978-0-309-07411-7 | DOI 10.17226/10094 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK National Academy of Engineering FIND RELATED TITLES Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 9 i Memorial Tributes NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 9 ii Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 9 iii NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Memorial Tributes Volume 9 NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 2001 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 9 iv International Standard Book Number 0–309–07411–8 International Standard Serial Number 1075–8844 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 20–1088636 Additional copies of this publication are available from: National Academy Press 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Box 285 Washington, D.C. 20055 800– 624–6242 or 202–334–3313 (in the Washington Metropolitan Area) B-467 Copyright 2001 by the National Academy of Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts Ii Contents
    2019 CAP Congress / Congrès de l’ACP 2019 Sunday, 2 June 2019 - Friday, 7 June 2019 Simon Fraser University Book of Abstracts ii Contents Frugal Science in the Age of Curiosity / La science frugale à l’ère de la curiosité . 1 R(D(∗)) measurement at the Belle II Detector ........................ 1 WITHDRAWN - Symmetry restoration in mixed-spin paired heavy nuclei . 2 Quantum cryptography in realistic conditions with structured photons .......... 2 To Flip or not to Flip: Video Experiments in Physics Teacher Education .......... 3 WITHDRAWN - Estimation of interdiffusion variables for tungsten - glassy carbon couples ................................................ 3 35 - Plasmon-Enhanced Stimulated Raman Spectroscopy with Low-Power CW Lasers . 4 Modeling the slow cytotoxic swelling of dystrophic muscle fibers ............. 4 Probing the Strangeonium Hybrid Content of the Y(2175) Using Gaussian Sum-Rules . 5 Reducing dissipation in far-from-equilibrium biomolecular processes ........... 5 9 - Game of Hadrons ...................................... 6 About the definition of a ”local” temperature around a spacecraft in the ionosphere . 6 Studying the brain across scales using imaging and physics ................. 7 An Analytic Study of the Fourier Transform of the Gravitational Wave Pulsar Signal with Spin-down Effects ...................................... 7 32 - Localizing and excluding quantum information; or, how to share a quantum secret in spacetime .......................................... 8 6 - Experimental Detection of Qubit-Ququart
    [Show full text]
  • Ieee-Level Awards
    IEEE-LEVEL AWARDS The IEEE currently bestows a Medal of Honor, fifteen Medals, thirty-three Technical Field Awards, two IEEE Service Awards, two Corporate Recognitions, two Prize Paper Awards, Honorary Memberships, one Scholarship, one Fellowship, and a Staff Award. The awards and their past recipients are listed below. Citations are available via the “Award Recipients with Citations” links within the information below. Nomination information for each award can be found by visiting the IEEE Awards Web page www.ieee.org/awards or by clicking on the award names below. Links are also available via the Recipient/Citation documents. MEDAL OF HONOR Ernst A. Guillemin 1961 Edward V. Appleton 1962 Award Recipients with Citations (PDF, 26 KB) John H. Hammond, Jr. 1963 George C. Southworth 1963 The IEEE Medal of Honor is the highest IEEE Harold A. Wheeler 1964 award. The Medal was established in 1917 and Claude E. Shannon 1966 Charles H. Townes 1967 is awarded for an exceptional contribution or an Gordon K. Teal 1968 extraordinary career in the IEEE fields of Edward L. Ginzton 1969 interest. The IEEE Medal of Honor is the highest Dennis Gabor 1970 IEEE award. The candidate need not be a John Bardeen 1971 Jay W. Forrester 1972 member of the IEEE. The IEEE Medal of Honor Rudolf Kompfner 1973 is sponsored by the IEEE Foundation. Rudolf E. Kalman 1974 John R. Pierce 1975 E. H. Armstrong 1917 H. Earle Vaughan 1977 E. F. W. Alexanderson 1919 Robert N. Noyce 1978 Guglielmo Marconi 1920 Richard Bellman 1979 R. A. Fessenden 1921 William Shockley 1980 Lee deforest 1922 Sidney Darlington 1981 John Stone-Stone 1923 John Wilder Tukey 1982 M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Board of Governors
    Table of Contents The Board of Governors..........................................................................................................1 The Scientific and Academic Advisory Committee...............................................................9 Institute Officers.....................................................................................................................11 The Weizmann Institute of Science.......................................................................................15 Faculty of Biochemistry.........................................................................................................17 Faculty of Biochemistry...............................................................................................18 Biological Chemistry....................................................................................................20 Molecular Genetics.......................................................................................................30 Plant Sciences...............................................................................................................39 Biological Services.......................................................................................................47 The Avron−Wilstätter Minerva Center for Research in Photosynthesis......................50 The Y. Leon Benoziyo Institute for Molecular Medicine............................................52 The Dr. Josef Cohn Minerva Center for Biomembrane Research................................54 The
    [Show full text]