DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ran and the Acquisition of a Surface to Air Missile Capability

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Ran and the Acquisition of a Surface to Air Missile Capability Royal Australian Navy Sea Power Centre Working Paper No. 2 STRUGGLING FOR A SOLUTION: THE RAN AND THE ACQUISITION OF A SURFACE TO AIR MISSILE CAPABILITY Peter Jones and James Goldrick January 2000 ii Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2000 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the Department of Defence Announcement statement—may be announced to the public. Secondary release—may be released to the public. All Defence information, whether classified or not, is protected from unauthorised disclosure under the Crimes Act 1914. Defence Information may only be released in accordance with the Defence Protective Security Manual (SECMAN 4) and/or Defence Instruction (General) OPS 13-4—Release of Classified Defence Information to Other Countries, as appropriate. Requests and inquiries should be addressed to the Director, Sea Power Centre, HMAS CRESWELL, JERVIS BAY NSW 2540. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Jones, P.D. (Peter D.). Struggling for a solution – the RAN and the acquisition of a surface to air missile capability. ISBN 0 642 29530 1 1. Australia. Royal Australian Navy. 2. Antiaircraft guns - Australia. 3. Surface to Air Missiles - Australia. 4. Australia - Defences. I. Goldrick, James. II. Australia. Royal Australian Navy. Sea Power Centre. III. Title. (Series : Working paper (Australia. Royal Australian Navy. Sea Power Centre); no. 2). 358.174820994 iii Disclaimer The views expressed are the authors’ and not necessarily those of the Department of Defence. The Commonwealth of Australia will not be legally responsible in contract, tort or otherwise for any statement made in this publication. Royal Australian Navy Sea Power Centre The Royal Australian Navy Sea Power Centre (SPC - formerly the Maritime Studies Program) was established to undertake activities which would promote the study, discussion and awareness of maritime issues and strategy within the RAN and the defence and civil communities at large. The aims of the SPC are: to promote the awareness among members of the RAN and wider Defence community of maritime strategy, maritime issues and the role maritime forces play in the security of national interests; and to contribute to the development of public awareness of the need for sea power in the defence of Australia and her sovereign interests. Comment on this Working Paper or any inquiry related to the activities of the Sea Power Centre should be directed to: Director Sea Power Centre HMAS CRESWELL JERVIS BAY 2540 Australia Telephone: +61 2 4429 7948 Facsimile: +61 2 4429 7969 E-Mail: [email protected] Sea Power Centre Working Papers The Sea Power Centre Working Paper series is designed as a vehicle to foster debate and discussion on maritime issues of relevance to the Royal Australian Navy, the Australian Defence Force and to Australia and the region more generally. iv About the Authors Peter Jones is a Captain in the RAN currently serving as the Director Strategy and Futures in Navy Headquarters. He holds BA and MA degrees and is a Principal Warfare Officer sub-specialised in gunnery. Peter Jones joined the RAN College in 1974. Major sea appointments include HMAS IPSWICH, HMAS CANBERRA, HMAS SYDNEY as Executive Officer and HMAS MELBOURNE as Commanding Officer in 1998-99. He has served in charge of the RAN’s Tactical Development Cell, as Research Officer to the Chief of Navy and on exchange with the Canadian Forces. James Goldrick is a Captain in the RAN currently serving as the Director of the Sea Power Centre. He holds a BA and an M.Litt and is a Principal Warfare Officer sub-specialised in anti-submarine warfare. Major sea appointments include HMAS CESSNOCK as Commanding Officer, HMAS Perth as Executive Officer and HMAS SYDNEY as Commanding Officer in 1996-98 and again in 1999. He has also served as OIC Warfare at the RAN Surface Warfare School, as a Research Fellow at the US Naval War College and on exchange with the Royal Navy. STRUGGLING FOR A SOLUTION: THE RAN AND THE ACQUISITION OF A SURFACE TO AIR MISSILE CAPABILITY1 Peter Jones and James Goldrick Introduction By the end of the 1950s, the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) was facing a number of conflicting demands on its limited resources. For the previous decade the RAN had concentrated on developing and then maintaining a small fixed wing carrier capability, first in what could be described as a ‘light strike’ role and latterly for anti-submarine warfare (ASW). The remainder of the active fleet was composed of a handful of destroyers and frigates, which were intended to provide escorts for the carrier and for merchant shipping in the protection of sea communications role. The duties of the RAN, broadly speaking, were to contribute towards the collective security arrangements in South East Asia in situations short of global war and, in the latter event, to contribute to the theatre capability for the protection of Australian and Allied shipping from the Soviet submarine forces. These duties had evolved from a combination of strategic and financial realities. They reflected what were likely to be the principal strategic demands on maritime Australia in both peace and war, but they also reflected the limitations on capability that had resulted from the government's insistence on restraining defence expenditure in favour of national development. In particular, the theatre ASW role meant that higher levels of capability in other warfare areas, such as anti-air (AAW) and anti-surface, were simply not required because the Australian units would be expected to operate well away from such threats or under the US/UK maritime air umbrella. This relatively comfortable situation was changing rapidly by the end of the 1950s. The capabilities of the Chinese submarine force seemed to be increasing substantially under Russian tutelage. The attitude of Indonesia was distinctly anti-western and tensions were rising with the Netherlands over the ownership of Dutch New Guinea. Indonesia was acquiring not only submarines but also modern surface combatants from the Soviet Union via 1 This is an expanded and developed version of a paper ‘Buying the DDGs’ by Peter Jones which first appeared in T.R. Frame, J.V.P. Goldrick & P.D. Jones (eds) Reflections on the Royal Australian Navy, Kangaroo Press, Kenthurst, 1991, pp. 316- 29. 2 SPC Working Paper No. 2 Poland, some of which carried heavier armament than any RAN surface unit.2 Furthermore, the Indonesians were also on their way towards acquiring bombers configured for maritime strike operations from the Soviets. The key difference between this situation and all the RAN’s previous experience was that there was a very real prospect emerging that circumstances might require the fleet to operate under high threat conditions without any support from the United States Navy at all and with the possibility that the Royal Navy might be so occupied elsewhere within the archipelago as to be unable to provide cover for the RAN.3 There was little prospect of substantial support from the Royal Australian Air Force, whose bomber force was relatively small and in any case would have many calls on it for land strike operations. The fighter force simply did not possess the range to operate at any distance from the Australian mainland. To all these developments the RAN had few immediate answers. Its only substantial anti-surface capabilities were in the 4.5 inch gunned destroyers and the handful of SEA VENOM aircraft, which also had the major responsibility for anti-air defence of the fleet. One solution would be the acquisition of a larger and more modern aircraft carrier, which could operate sufficient numbers of strike and attack aircraft to neutralise the Indonesians. But the scale of defence funding was such that this was unlikely to be a practicable proposition. Even the most optimistic assessment of the cost of a replacement for the MELBOURNE and her air group with a refurbished British vessel and new aircraft suggested that the cost would be 25% more than the RAN’s entire annual budget.4 This realisation with the Australian defence community generally was placing increasing pressure on the RAN’s maintaining a carrier force at all, given the extent to which it demanded resources. The situation was acknowledged in the 2 ‘Sino-Soviet Military Aid Programs’, US Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) Review vol. 14, no. 9, September 1959, p. 406. 3 For the first internal defence appreciation of this situation, see the strategic paper cited by Commodore H.J. Donohue ‘The Evolution of Australian Strategic Defense Thinking’ Dora Laves (ed.), Evolving Pacific Basin Strategies: the 1989 Pacific Symposium, National Defense University, Washington DC, 1990, p. 286. 4 Eric J. Grove, “‘Advice and Assistance to a very independent people at a most crucial point’: the British Admiralty and the Future of the RAN 1958-60” David Stevens (ed.), Maritime Power in the Twentieth Century: the Australian Experience, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 1998, p. 137. Struggling for a Solution 3 February 1957 Review of Defence which focused on the structure of the armed forces.5 Nevertheless, the global war requirements for theatre ASW had not disappeared completely and this role retained its force structure priorities. The possibilities of conflict with Indonesia did not mean that the threat of global war or the requirement to prepare for it had completely disappeared. The RAN was therefore faced with the dilemma of creating new capabilities to deal with the surface and air threat at the same time as it attempted to sustain its existing commitments. The solution eventually adopted, much of which is outside the scope of this paper, proved practicable in the longer term because of a mix of improved funding and technological innovation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3-VIEWS - TABLE of CONTENTS to Search: Hold "Ctrl" Key Then Press "F" Key
    3-VIEWS - TABLE of CONTENTS To search: Hold "Ctrl" key then press "F" key. Enter manufacturer or model number in search box. Click your back key to return to the search page. It is highly recommended to read Order Instructions and Information pages prior to selection. Aircraft MFGs beginning with letter A ................................................................. 3 B ................................................................. 6 C.................................................................10 D.................................................................14 E ................................................................. 17 F ................................................................. 18 G ................................................................21 H................................................................. 23 I .................................................................. 26 J ................................................................. 26 K ................................................................. 27 L ................................................................. 28 M ................................................................30 N................................................................. 35 O ................................................................37 P ................................................................. 38 Q ................................................................40 R................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines
    The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines Product Code #F655 A Special Focused Market Segment Analysis by: Aviation Gas Turbine Forecast Analysis 5 The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines 2010-2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................2 Methodology ..............................................................................................................................................................2 Trends..........................................................................................................................................................................3 The Competitive Environment...............................................................................................................................3 Market Statistics .......................................................................................................................................................4 Table 1 - The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines Unit Production by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019 ..................................................5 Table 2 - The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines Value Statistics by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019...................................................8 Figure
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques Tiziou Space Collection
    Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Isaac Middleton and Melissa A. N. Keiser 2019 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series : Files, (bulk 1960-2011)............................................................................... 4 Series : Photography, (bulk 1960-2011)................................................................. 25 Jacques Tiziou Space Collection NASM.2018.0078 Collection Overview Repository: National Air and Space Museum Archives Title: Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Identifier: NASM.2018.0078 Date: (bulk 1960s through
    [Show full text]
  • We Envy No Man on Earth Because We Fly. the Australian Fleet Air
    We Envy No Man On Earth Because We Fly. The Australian Fleet Air Arm: A Comparative Operational Study. This thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Murdoch University 2016 Sharron Lee Spargo BA (Hons) Murdoch University I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. …………………………………………………………………………….. Abstract This thesis examines a small component of the Australian Navy, the Fleet Air Arm. Naval aviators have been contributing to Australian military history since 1914 but they remain relatively unheard of in the wider community and in some instances, in Australian military circles. Aviation within the maritime environment was, and remains, a versatile weapon in any modern navy but the struggle to initiate an aviation branch within the Royal Australian Navy was a protracted one. Finally coming into existence in 1947, the Australian Fleet Air Arm operated from the largest of all naval vessels in the post battle ship era; aircraft carriers. HMAS Albatross, Sydney, Vengeance and Melbourne carried, operated and fully maintained various fixed-wing aircraft and the naval personnel needed for operational deployments until 1982. These deployments included contributions to national and multinational combat, peacekeeping and humanitarian operations. With the Australian government’s decision not to replace the last of the aging aircraft carriers, HMAS Melbourne, in 1982, the survival of the Australian Fleet Air Arm, and its highly trained personnel, was in grave doubt. This was a major turning point for Australian Naval Aviation; these versatile flyers and the maintenance and technical crews who supported them retrained on rotary aircraft, or helicopters, and adapted to flight operations utilising small compact ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Desind Finding
    NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE ARCHIVES Herbert Stephen Desind Collection Accession No. 1997-0014 NASM 9A00657 National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC Brian D. Nicklas © Smithsonian Institution, 2003 NASM Archives Desind Collection 1997-0014 Herbert Stephen Desind Collection 109 Cubic Feet, 305 Boxes Biographical Note Herbert Stephen Desind was a Washington, DC area native born on January 15, 1945, raised in Silver Spring, Maryland and educated at the University of Maryland. He obtained his BA degree in Communications at Maryland in 1967, and began working in the local public schools as a science teacher. At the time of his death, in October 1992, he was a high school teacher and a freelance writer/lecturer on spaceflight. Desind also was an avid model rocketeer, specializing in using the Estes Cineroc, a model rocket with an 8mm movie camera mounted in the nose. To many members of the National Association of Rocketry (NAR), he was known as “Mr. Cineroc.” His extensive requests worldwide for information and photographs of rocketry programs even led to a visit from FBI agents who asked him about the nature of his activities. Mr. Desind used the collection to support his writings in NAR publications, and his building scale model rockets for NAR competitions. Desind also used the material in the classroom, and in promoting model rocket clubs to foster an interest in spaceflight among his students. Desind entered the NASA Teacher in Space program in 1985, but it is not clear how far along his submission rose in the selection process. He was not a semi-finalist, although he had a strong application.
    [Show full text]
  • China Missile Chronology
    China Missile Chronology Last update: June 2012 2012 18 May 2012 The Department of Defense releases the 2012 “Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China” report. The report highlights that the PLA Air force is modernizing its ground‐based air defense forces with conventional medium‐range ballistic missiles, which can “conduct precision strikes against land targets and naval ships, including aircraft carriers, operating far from China’s shores beyond the first island chain.” According to the Department of Defense’s report, China will acquire DF‐31A intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and enhanced, silo‐based DF‐5 (CSS‐4) ICMBs by 2015. To date, China is the third country that has developed a stealth combat aircraft, after the U.S. and Russia. J‐20 is expected conduct military missions by 2018. It will be equipped with “air‐to‐air missiles, air‐to‐surface missiles, anti‐radiation missiles, laser‐guided bombs and drop bombs.”J‐20 stealth fighter is a distinguished example of Chinese military modernization. – Office of Secretary of Defense, “Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2012,” distributed by U.S. Department of Defense, May 2012, www.defense.gov; Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, David Helvey, “Press Briefing on 2012 DOD Report to Congress on ‘Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China,’” distributed by U.S. Department of Defense, 18 May 2012, www.defense.gov; “Chengdu J‐20 Multirole Stealth Fighter Aircraft, China,” Airforce‐Technology, www.airforce‐technology.com. 15 April 2012 North Korea shows off a potential new ICBM in a military parade.
    [Show full text]
  • HMS Southampton
    HMS Southampton HMS SoutHaMpton The replacement for the destroyers of the County-class, were much more compact and austere than their fore bearers. The primary on role of the Type 42s was to provide area air I defence for the ships they had to escort. With their long-range sensor fit they also could act as radar pickets, sailing ahead of a Task Group to act as its eyes and ears. The loss of HMS Sheffield and Coventry dem- Introduct onstrated, this latter role denied the ships supporting fire from accompanying warships and highlighted their vulnerability. 2 Warship 09 developMent In the 1960s the Royal Navy was still one On 14 February 1966, after a day long an all-gas turbine (COGOG) propul- of the premier carrier fleets in the world, meeting, the Cabinet decided to cancel sion system, using Rolls-Royce Olympus second only to the US Navy which was the plans for the construction of the new turbines for main drive and Tynes for in the process of building 80,000 tons carrier. The Labour government calculated cruising. aircraft carriers of the Kitty Hawk-class. that maintaining a carrier air group East of Although lacking Ikara, the ASW capabil- The increasing weight and size of modern Suez would be 60% more expensive than ity was greatly improved over previous jet fighters meant that a larger deck area as a land based airforce. Along with the ships by providing a hangared Lynx light was required for take offs and landings. cancellation went the proposed Type 82 helicopter (armed with torpedoes and Although the Royal Navy had come up destroyers designed to escort them.
    [Show full text]
  • Archie to SAM a Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air Defense
    Archie to SAM A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air Defense Second Edition KENNETH P. WERRELL Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama August 2005 Air University Library Cataloging Data Werrell, Kenneth P. Archie to SAM : a short operational history of ground-based air defense / Kenneth P. Werrell.—2nd ed. —p. ; cm. Rev. ed. of: Archie, flak, AAA, and SAM : a short operational history of ground- based air defense, 1988. With a new preface. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-136-8 1. Air defenses—History. 2. Anti-aircraft guns—History. 3. Anti-aircraft missiles— History. I. Title. 358.4/145—dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public re- lease: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii In memory of Michael Lewis Hyde Born 14 May 1938 Graduated USAF Academy 8 June 1960 Killed in action 8 December 1966 A Patriot, A Classmate, A Friend THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii DEDICATION . iii FOREWORD . xiii ABOUT THE AUTHOR . xv PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION . xvii PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION . xix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . xxi 1 ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD WAR II . 1 British Antiaircraft Artillery . 4 The V-1 Campaign . 13 American Antiaircraft Artillery . 22 German Flak . 24 Allied Countermeasures . 42 Fratricide . 46 The US Navy in the Pacific .
    [Show full text]
  • Highgate Highlights Dec18
    Issue 591 | December 2018 ISSN 2206-7345 (print) ISSN 2206-7353 (online) Highgate Highlights YOUR 2018-19 COMMITTEE President Official newsletter of Highgate RSL Sub-Branch Geoff Hourn | 0414 063 707 [email protected] Returned & Services League of Australia (WA) www.highgate-rsl.org.au Senior Vice President John Cleary | 0417 955 864 From our President [email protected] he Centenary of Armistice is over and the centennial Junior Vice President & Editor commemorations fall silent. Continuing, however, is the legacy of Roger Buddrige | 0408 900 126 [email protected] T that wonderful, strong, generation that helped save the world and forge a new country. Treasurer Bill Munro | 0411 750 775 Befittingly, as an RSL Sub-Branch that was begun by World War I [email protected] veterans just a few years after the Armistice, Highgate continues to Secretary commemorate that legacy day by day in Kings Park, through the Sub Greg Wilson Wardens of the State War Memorial and the Honour Avenue Group. 0412 095 201 | 9448 8213 In addition to commemorating that World War I legacy in this centenary Box 65 Hillarys 6923 [email protected] year, Highgate has also helped to propagate that legacy by successfully completing the Remembrance Walk in Kings Park. Warden & Immediate Past President Steve Chamarette We have also provided public access to a Virtual Memorial for Western 0409 257 469 | 9242 1865 Australia. [email protected] Both projects help immortalise the legacy of our forebears, for families Pensions & Veterans Affairs and students and the six million annual visitors to Kings Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Headmark 110 Spring 2003
    Journal of the Australian Naval Institute Spring 2003 AUSTRALIAN NAVAL INSTITUTE The Australian Naval Institute was formed and incorporated in the Australian Capital Territory in 1975. The main objectives of the Institute are: • to encourage and promote the advancement of knowledge related to the Navy and the maritime profession; and • to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas concerning subjects related to the Navy and the maritime profession. The Institute is self-supporting and non-profit-making. Views and opinions expressed in the Journal o/'tlit' Australian Naval Institute are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Institute, the Royal Australian Navy or the Australian Defence Organisation. The aim is to encourage discussion, dissemination of information, comment and opinion and the advancement of professional knowledge concerning naval and maritime matters. PATRON Chief of Navy Vice Admiral Chris Ritchie, AO RAN COUNCIL MEMBERS President Rear Admiral Rowan Moffitt, RAN Vice President Captain Richard Mcnhinick, CSC RAN Secretary Commander Peter Leavy, RAN Treasurer Lieutenant Commander Craig Opie, RAN Journal Kditor Mr Andrew Forbes Councillor Commodore James Goldrick, CSC RAN Councillor Captain Peter Jones, AM RAN Councillor Captain Ray Griggs. CSC RAN Councillor Dr David Stevens Councillor Commander Kevin Codes, RNZN Public Officer Lieutenant Patience Neal, RAN AREA REPRESENTATIVES The following Institute members have agreed to act as points of contact on membership issues and for submitting articles, book reviews
    [Show full text]
  • Headmark 052 14-2 May 1988
    Registered by Australia Post VOLUME 14 Publication No. NBP 0282 MAY 1988 NUMBER 2 iSSN 0312-5807 JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN NAVAL INSTITUTE AUSTRALIAN NAVAL INSTITUTE INC 1 The Australian Naval Institute Inc is incorporated in the Australian Capital Territory. The main objects of the Institute are a. to encourage and promote the advancement of knowledge related to the Navy and the maritime profession, b. to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas concerning subjects related to the Navy and the maritime profession, and c. to publish a journal. 2 The Institute is self supporting and non-profit making. The aim is to encourage discussion, dissemination of information, comment and opinion and the advancement of professional knowledge concerning naval and maritime matters. 3. Membership of the Institute is open to — a. Regular Members — Members of the Permanent Naval Forces of Australia. b. Associate Members — (1) Members of the Reserve Naval Forces of Australia. (2) Members of the Australian Military Forces and the Royal Australian Air Force both permanent and reserve. (3) Ex-members of the Australian Defence Force, both permanent and reserve components, provided that they have been honourably discharged from that Force. (4) Other persons having and professing a special interest in naval and maritime affairs. c. Honorary Members — Persons who have made distinguished contributions to the naval or maritime profession or who have rendered distinguished service to the Institute may be elected by the Council to Honorary Membership. 4. Joining fee for Regular and Associate members if $5. Annual subscription for both is $20. 5. Inquiries and application for membership should be directed to: The Secretary, Australian Naval Institute Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • On a New Bearing: the Re-Organised Royal Australian Navy at War in Vietnam
    Steven Paget Published in The Mariner's Mirror, 101:3, August 2015, pp.283-303. This is the post-print version and must not be copied or cited without permission. On a New Bearing: The Re-organised Royal Australian Navy at War in Vietnam The Royal Australian Navy (RAN) made a modest but important commitment of a single destroyer to the Vietnam War on a rotational basis between March 1967 and September 1971. The contrast between the deployments of the American-designed and built Charles F. Adams class guided missile destroyers and the British-designed Daring class destroyer, HMAS Vendetta, represented the fruition of a small navy being pulled in two different directions. The RAN was undergoing a transitional period, which saw the service increasingly align with the United States Navy. This was a monumental shift in policy, as the Royal Navy had provided a model for the RAN to emulate since its creation in 1911. The Vietnam War offered a clear test of standardization and demonstrated that common ship designs provided a platform for interoperability, but did not guarantee it. The Australian ships were able to make a worthwhile contribution to a predominantly American naval effort, but they faced a number of challenges in achieving interoperability. The basis for successful co-operation was provided by the existence of common procedures and standardized equipment, but was necessarily supplemented by ad hoc measures and impromptu workarounds. The Australian Chief of Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Roy Dowling, wrote to the First Sea Lord, Lord Louis Mountbatten, in 1955: The time has arrived when we must decide where we shall acquire ships and weapons – UK or USA.
    [Show full text]