Report of the Inquiry Into Recognition for Service with 547 Signal Troop In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report of the Inquiry Into Recognition for Service with 547 Signal Troop In INQUIRY INTO RECOGNITION FOR SERVICE WITH 547 SIGNAL TROOP IN VIETNAM FROM 1966 TO 1971 CONTENTS CONTENTS..........................................................................................................................................................2 LETTER OF TRANSMISSION ...........................................................................................................................4 TERMS OF REFERENCE....................................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................6 Eligibility Criteria for the Meritorious Unit Citation (MUC) ....................................................................6 Belated Recognition (Retrospectivity) ..........................................................................................................6 Assessment of the Performance of 547 Signal Troop .................................................................................8 Other recognition ............................................................................................................................................9 Summary of Conclusions ...............................................................................................................................9 Recommendations.........................................................................................................................................10 REPORT OF THE TRIBUNAL .........................................................................................................................11 PART A – PRELIMINARY MATTERS ...........................................................................................................11 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................11 Conflict of Interest.........................................................................................................................................11 Steps Taken in the Inquiry ...........................................................................................................................11 Hearings .........................................................................................................................................................12 Tribunal Research..........................................................................................................................................12 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................12 Structure of the Report .................................................................................................................................12 PART B - GENERAL ISSUES ...........................................................................................................................13 Tribunal’s Understanding of Its Terms of Reference ...............................................................................13 Meritorious Unit Citation – Background and Eligibility .........................................................................14 Belated Recognition (Retrospectivity) ........................................................................................................16 Arguments for Belated Awards ..................................................................................................................21 Arguments against Belated Awards...........................................................................................................21 Tribunal Consideration ................................................................................................................................25 Summary of Conclusions with regard to the Belated Award of the MUC for service before 1991 ...27 PART C - SPECIFIC CASE OF 547 SIGNAL TROOP ...................................................................................28 Historical Background to Australian Signal Intelligence.........................................................................28 Establishment of 547 Signal Troop..............................................................................................................29 Summary of 547 Signal Troop’s service in Vietnam.................................................................................30 Tribunal Consideration ................................................................................................................................33 Determining Eligibility of 547 Signal Troop for the MUC.......................................................................33 Arguments for Awarding an MUC to 547 Signal Troop..........................................................................36 Arguments against Awarding an MUC to 547 Signal Troop ..................................................................39 Assessment of the Performance of 547 Signal Troop ...............................................................................40 Page 2 Performance of 547 Signal Troop against ‘2006 CA Directive’ ...............................................................43 Criterion 1 - Operational Performance.......................................................................................................43 Criterion 2 - Strategic Significance..............................................................................................................44 Criterion 3 - Personnel Performance...........................................................................................................45 Criterion 4 - Unit Administration and Operational and Security Performance ...................................45 Criterion 5 - Other Claims............................................................................................................................45 Tribunal Conclusion from the ‘2006 CA Directive’ ..................................................................................46 Tribunal Broader Consideration .................................................................................................................46 Other Recognition .........................................................................................................................................46 PART D - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................48 Conclusions....................................................................................................................................................48 Recommendations.........................................................................................................................................48 APPENDICES.....................................................................................................................................................49 Appendix 1 - List of Submissions Received...................................................................................................49 Appendix 2 - List of Hearing Dates and Submitters.....................................................................................51 Appendix 3 - Bibliography of Research Materials ........................................................................................55 Appendix 4 – Meritorious Unit Citation Recipients .....................................................................................58 Appendix 5 - Chief of Army (Leahy) Directive .............................................................................................61 Appendix 6 - AHQ(DMI) Instruction No. 1/66 COMINT Support for 1ATF Vietnam 17 June 1966....68 Appendix 7 - 547 Signal Troop Composition, Chronology of Landmark Events and Notable Achievements 1966 – 1971 ................................................................................................................................73 Appendix 8 – Commendations of 547 Signal Troop in Vietnam.................................................................81 Page 3 TERMS OF REFERENCE INQUIRY INTO RECOGNITION FOR SERVICE WITH 547 SIGNAL TROOP IN VIETNAM FROM 1966 TO 1971 The Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal (the Tribunal) is directed to inquire into and report on recognition for Australian military personnel who served with 547 Signal Troop in Vietnam between 1966 and 1971. In particular, the Tribunal is to examine relevant evidence and consider whether it is appropriate that members of 547 Signal Troop who served with the unit between 1966 and 1971 be awarded the Meritorious Unit Citation or an another form of medallic recognition for their service. The Tribunal is to determine its own procedures, in accordance with the general principles of procedural fairness, when conducting its inquiry as set out in these Terms of Reference. In this regard the Tribunal may interview such persons as it considers appropriate and consider material provided to it that is relevant to these Terms of Reference. The Tribunal is to report, in writing, to the Parliamentary Secretary for Defence on the findings and recommendations that arise from the inquiry. In making its findings and formulating its recommendations the Tribunal is to arrive at a fair and sustainable response to current and future claims for recognition. It is to maintain
Recommended publications
  • New Zealand) the Chief of Defence Force (CDF
    Chief of Defence Force (New Zealand) The Chief of Defence Force (CDF) is the appointment held by the professional head of the New Zealand Defence Force. The post has existed under its present name since 1991. From 1963 to 1991 the head of the New Zealand Defence Force was known as the Chief of Defence Staff. All the incumbents have held three-star rank. Current Chief of Defence Force Tim Keating (soldier) Lieutenant General Tim Keating, MNZM is a New Zealand Army officer and the current Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force. He was appointed to this position immediately following his tenure as Vice Chief of Defence Force. He served as Chief of Army from 2011 to 2012. Keating was promoted to lieutenant general and took over as Chief of Defence Force for a three-year term on 1 February 2014. Career highlights January 1982: enlisted into the New Zealand Army as an Officer Cadet December 1982: joined the Royal New Zealand Infantry Regiment upon graduation from the Officer Cadet School in Waiouru January 1985: Second-in-Command of a Rifle Company, 2nd/1st Battalion June 1986: posted to New Zealand Special Air Service Group December 1988: promoted to the rank of Captain December 1990: returned to NZSAS Group and was appointed Officer Commanding A Squadron 1996: completed the Australian Command and Staff Course in Queenscliff October 1997: posted on promotion as the Commanding Officer of the New Zealand contingent to the Multinational Force in the Sinai Peninsula January 1999: Commanding Officer, 1 NZSAS Group December 2001: Commandant, Officer
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Anne Summers Issue 11 2015
    Number 11 February 2015 America’s Lesbian-in-Chief Guide to Oz crime fiction Harlem redux Special Report Australia’s think tanks Sane Factual Relevant General Morrison’s revelation “This was not the Army that I loved and thought I knew.” #11 February 2015 I HOPE YOU ENJOY our first issue for 2015, and our eleventh since we started our digital voyage just over two years ago. We introduce Explore, a new section dealing with ideas, science, social issues and movements, and travel, a topic many of you said, via our readers’ survey late last year, you wanted us to cover. (Read the full results of the survey on page 85.) I am so pleased to be able to welcome to our pages the exceptional mrandmrsamos, the husband-and-wife team of writer Lee Tulloch and photographer Tony Amos, whose piece on the Harlem revival is just a taste of the treats that lie ahead. No ordinary travel writing, I can assure you. Anne Summers We are very proud to publish our first investigative special EDITOR & PUBLISHER report on Australia’s think tanks. Who are they? Who runs them? Who funds them? How accountable are they and how Stephen Clark much influence do they really have? In this landmark piece ART DIRECTOR of reporting, Robert Milliken uncovers how thinks tanks are Foong Ling Kong increasingly setting the agenda for the government. MANAGING EDITOR In other reports, you will meet Merryn Johns, the Australian woman making a splash as a magazine editor Wendy Farley in New York and who happens to be known as America’s Get Anne Summers DESIGNER Lesbian-in-Chief.
    [Show full text]
  • Golan Journal 112, July
    Dear Reader ! First of all, let me INDCON, (see pages welcome our newly 14, 15), Change of Com- arrived Press Offi- mand and Medal Parade cers: Maj Sid- in POLBATT (see pages dartha Rathore 20, 21), SLOVCONS Editorial (DFPM), Capt Sylwester Wlaszczyk Tennis Trophy at Camp (PB), Capt V Kranthi Kumar (LB), Faouar (see pages 16, 17), Lt 1 Takahiro Shibukawa (J-CON) change of Command at and Capt Gregor Zeleznik (OGG). As the J-CON (page 18), a This Edition’s Editorial Team always, a big round of applause for all very interesting article about the Map- Hermann, Arnold, Stefan, Ichiro Press Officers and your great articles. ping section of UNDOF (see pages Unfortunately, when so many new 22 and 23), and last, but definitely not our 2nd Golan Journal together and I people arrive, also some others go back least, we have the personal messages know already now, that I am going home and in this case we have to say of UNDOF 1, the Force Commander to miss Arny with his good sense of Good-Bye to all of the leaving Press MGen Wolfgang Jilke, of UNDOF 2, humor and positive thinking. Thanks Officers. Thanks a million for all your the COS Col Andrzej Ostrovski and to everyone for all your support to us hard work and support. UNDOF 3, some words about integra- and the Golan Journal! Apart from that there has been also tion by CAO, Mr. Patrik J. Devaney. a lot of action, like the Charity Activi- For ‘Arny’ it is time to say Good-Bye ties (see pages 12, 13), lots of ‘New Peo- to our readers, since Arnold Felfer will Yours sincerely, ple to UNDOF’ (see pages 6, 7), Medal most likely get a new job in December Capt Hermann Altmanninger, SOPR parade and 60th Independence Day in after a ½ -year tour of duty.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Royal Australian Regiment Foundation
    ‘SERVING THE REGIMENT’ Bulletin f The Royal ustralian Regiment oundation ABN 02 3 G o 3596 GRIITH ACT 2603 TE: 265 42 Eail: [email protected] Web www.rarfoundation.org.au Isu N 37 – November 2019 Third Battalion the Royal Australian Regiment: Machine gun firing with illumination at night. 2347_RARF Bulletin 2019.indd 1 11/11/19 3:46 pm PRESIDENT’S REPORT last eight years and with the support of the Board has ensured the Foundation is well positioned 2019 has been another successful year for to continue and expand its work into the future. the Foundation as we continue to focus on Mr Greg Heywood, our General Manager has supporting the development of the Regiment departed and handed over his role to Ms Tricia and its serving members. We continued to Van der Walt. I would like to acknowledged recognise and foster the leadership qualities Greg’s great work over a two year period for which the Royal Australian Regiment is and thank Tricia on assuming the important renowned and in May 19, the Foundation again functions of General Manager. I would like to funded a battlefield tour of Vietnam by the 2018 thank our previous Secretary, Brigadier Mark Hassett Award nominees. The nominees were Bornholt, who served the Foundation tirelessly accompanied by Warrant Officer Class One Dave over the last eight years and acknowledge the Trill and gained an enhanced understanding appointment of our new Secretary Mr Glenn of the Regiment’s operations in Vietnam. The Crosland. I would also like to acknowledge my Foundation maintained its support to serving fellow Board members for their work throughout members of the Regiment through the provision the year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Defence, Police and Emergency
    THE AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE, POLICE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES LEADERSHIP SUMMIT 2015 ASSOCIATION MEMBER RATES Developing Today’s Managers LIMITED SEATS for Leadership Excellence AVAILABLE PREVIOUS SUMMIT SPEAKERS INCLUDE: David Melville APM David Irvine Lieutenant General Tony Negus APM Rear Admiral D.R. Air Marshal Ken D. Lay APM Warren J. Riley Former Commissioner, Former Director General David Morrison AO Former Commissioner Thomas AO, CSC, RAN Mark Binskin AO Former Chief Commissioner, Former Superintendent, QLD Ambulance Service of Security ASIO Chief of Army Australian Federal Police Former Deputy Former Vice Chief of the Victoria Police New Orleans Chief of Navy Defence Force (VCDF) Police Department The Australian Defence, Police and Emergency Services Leadership Summit 2015 will be held in Melbourne on Thursday 25th and Friday 26th June. In its sixth year, this HOST CITY significant national program drawing together the sectors most respected thought leaders with the aim to equip managers/leaders with the skills to adapt and respond ef- fectively, particularly in highly pressurised or extreme situ- PARK HYATT, MELBOURNE ations where effective leadership saves lives. 25TH & 26TH JUNE PRESENTING ORGANISATIONS FROM THE 2012, 2013 & 2014 SUMMITS INCLUDE: Australian Government Department of Defence THE AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE, POLICE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES LEADERSHIP SUMMIT 2015 OVERVIEW Including presentations from an esteemed line-up of high ranking officers and officials, as well as frontline and operational people managers, the Summit offers an unparalleled opportunity to observe effective individual and organisational leadership inside of Australia’s Defence, Police and Emergency Services. In addition to providing a platform to explore contemporary leadership practice, the Summit provides a unique opportunity for delegates to develop invaluable professional and personal networks.
    [Show full text]
  • We Envy No Man on Earth Because We Fly. the Australian Fleet Air
    We Envy No Man On Earth Because We Fly. The Australian Fleet Air Arm: A Comparative Operational Study. This thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Murdoch University 2016 Sharron Lee Spargo BA (Hons) Murdoch University I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. …………………………………………………………………………….. Abstract This thesis examines a small component of the Australian Navy, the Fleet Air Arm. Naval aviators have been contributing to Australian military history since 1914 but they remain relatively unheard of in the wider community and in some instances, in Australian military circles. Aviation within the maritime environment was, and remains, a versatile weapon in any modern navy but the struggle to initiate an aviation branch within the Royal Australian Navy was a protracted one. Finally coming into existence in 1947, the Australian Fleet Air Arm operated from the largest of all naval vessels in the post battle ship era; aircraft carriers. HMAS Albatross, Sydney, Vengeance and Melbourne carried, operated and fully maintained various fixed-wing aircraft and the naval personnel needed for operational deployments until 1982. These deployments included contributions to national and multinational combat, peacekeeping and humanitarian operations. With the Australian government’s decision not to replace the last of the aging aircraft carriers, HMAS Melbourne, in 1982, the survival of the Australian Fleet Air Arm, and its highly trained personnel, was in grave doubt. This was a major turning point for Australian Naval Aviation; these versatile flyers and the maintenance and technical crews who supported them retrained on rotary aircraft, or helicopters, and adapted to flight operations utilising small compact ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Department of Defence Annual Report 2001
    DEFENCE ANNUAL REPORT 2001-02 HEADLINE RESULTS FOR 2001-02 Operational S Defence met the Government’s highest priority tasks through: effectively contributing to the international coalition against terrorism playing a major role in assisting East Timor in its transition to independence strengthening Australia’s border security increasing the Australian Defence Force’s (ADF) counter-terrorism capability providing substantial assistance to the Bougainville and Solomon Islands’ peace processes supporting civil agencies in curbing illegal fishing in Australian waters. S The ADF was at its highest level of activity since the Vietnam war. Social S 86 per cent of Australians said they were proud of the ADF – the highest figure recorded over the past 20 years. 85 per cent believed the ADF is effective and 87 per cent considered the ADF is well trained. Unacceptable behaviour in the ADF continued to be the community’s largest single concern. (Defence community attitudes tracking, April 2002) S ADF recruiting: Enlistments were up, Separations were down, Army Reserve retention rates were the highest for 40 years. S The new principles-based civilian certified agreement formally recognised a balance between employees’ work and private commitments. S Intake of 199 graduate trainees was highest ever. S Defence was awarded the Australian Public Sector Diversity Award for 2001. HEADLINE RESULTS FOR 2001-02 Financial S Defence recorded a net surplus of $4,410 million (before the Capital Use Charge of $4,634 million), when compared to the revised budget estimate of $4,772 million. S The net asset position is $45,589 million, an increase of $1,319 million or 3% over 2000-01.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Annual Report 2007-08 Volume 1 Department of Defence
    KEY STATISTICS Corporate and Financial 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Change More 2006-07 information to 2007-08 Financial Performance ($m) Income 15,830 17,448 17,249 18,480 21,085 p Chapter 1, Appendix 13 Expenses 16,362 18,318 17,394 19,147 21,686 p Chapter 1, Appendix 13 Operating result -532 -870 -145 -667 -601 Chapter 1, Appendix 13 Accounts paid 85.3 88.2 90.9 95.4 92.5 q Appendix 13 by due date (%) Net Capital 3,649 4,212 4,980 5,503 5,382 Chapter 6 Investment Program Staffing Total ADF members 52,034 51,813 51,151 51,504 53,167 p Chapter 4 Recruitment target met (%) 86 80 84 84 77 q Chapter 4 Separation rate (%) 10 11 11 11.2 9.8 q Chapter 4 Female ADF members (%) 13.3 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.6 p Appendix 1 Total APS personnel 18,303 13,390 13,577 14,516 15,087 p Chapter 4 Unacceptable 586 749 685 846 765 q Chapter 5 behaviour complaints Comcare investigations 46 45 34 69 99 p Chapter 4 Corporate Support FOI requests 208 206 171 184 175 q Appendix 6 Video news releases 62 141 67 109 284 p Chapter 8 Operational Number of operations with 32 14 22 19 19 - Chapter 3 ADF involvement 17 October 2008 The Hon Joel Fitzgibbon Minister for Defence Parliament House Dear Minister We present the annual report of the Department of Defence for the year ended 30 June 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Estimates 2012-2013
    Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade QUESTIONS ON NOTICE - COMMITTEES Senate Budget Estimates – 28/29 May 2012 Q1: Capability Decisions Senator Fawcett asked on Monday, 28 May 2012, Hansard pages 42-43. What mechanisms are in place to advise Government when the time taken to make decisions (in relation to capability) will have an impact on the cost of obtaining the capability? Response: There can be a cost impact in relation to major capital acquisitions if a decision is not made before a certain date. For example, in the case of the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) system, a Government decision may be sought by a particular date in order to benefit from the cost savings involved in joining a larger United States contract that is about to be finalised, or where a production line might be closing. In such cases the Minister is advised in a ministerial submission of any cost implications of missing tender validity or FMS deadlines. The advice to Government also discusses the timelines required for Government decisions and the cost impacts of industry and FMS offers expiring. Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade QUESTIONS ON NOTICE - COMMITTEES Senate Budget Estimates – 28/29 May 2012 Q2: USAF Engagement Senator Ludlam asked on Monday, 28 May 2012, Hansard page 48 and 49. (In relation to information regarding enhanced engagement with the US Air Force resulting from the US force posture review) – When are you likely to have something you could present to the parliament or the public? Response: In accordance with the force posture initiatives announced by Prime Minister Gillard and United States (US) President Obama on 16 November 2011, the level of routine US aircraft activity through northern Australia will increase over time, as an extension of our existing cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Army in the 21 Century and Restructuring the Army: A
    Army in the 21st Century and Restructuring the Army: A Retrospective Appraisal of Australian Military Change Management in the 1990s Renée Louise Kidson July 2016 A sub-thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Military and Defence Studies (Advanced) of The Australian National University © Copyright by Renée Louise Kidson 2016 All Rights Reserved 1 Declaration This sub-thesis is my own original work. I declare no part of this work has been: • copied from any other person's work except where due acknowledgement is made in the text; written by any other person; or • submitted for assessment in another course. The sub-thesis word count is 16,483 excluding Table of Contents, Annexes and Chapter 2 (Literature Review and Methods, a separate assessment under the MMDS(Adv) program). Renee Kidson Acknowledgements I owe my greatest thanks to my supervisors: Dr John Blaxland (ANU) and Colonel David Connery (Australian Army History Unit, AAHU), for wise counsel, patience and encouragement. Dr Roger Lee (Head, AAHU) provided funding support; and, crucially, a rigorous declassification process to make select material available for this work. Lieutenant Colonel Bill Houston gave up entire weekends to provide my access to secure archival vault facilities. Meegan Ablett and the team at the Australian Defence College Vale Green Library provided extensive bibliographic support over three years. Thanks are also extended to my interviewees: for the generosity of their time; the frankness of their views; their trust in disclosing materially relevant details to me; and for providing me with perhaps the finest military education of all – insights to the decision-making processes of senior leaders: military and civilian.
    [Show full text]
  • Highgate Highlights Dec18
    Issue 591 | December 2018 ISSN 2206-7345 (print) ISSN 2206-7353 (online) Highgate Highlights YOUR 2018-19 COMMITTEE President Official newsletter of Highgate RSL Sub-Branch Geoff Hourn | 0414 063 707 [email protected] Returned & Services League of Australia (WA) www.highgate-rsl.org.au Senior Vice President John Cleary | 0417 955 864 From our President [email protected] he Centenary of Armistice is over and the centennial Junior Vice President & Editor commemorations fall silent. Continuing, however, is the legacy of Roger Buddrige | 0408 900 126 [email protected] T that wonderful, strong, generation that helped save the world and forge a new country. Treasurer Bill Munro | 0411 750 775 Befittingly, as an RSL Sub-Branch that was begun by World War I [email protected] veterans just a few years after the Armistice, Highgate continues to Secretary commemorate that legacy day by day in Kings Park, through the Sub Greg Wilson Wardens of the State War Memorial and the Honour Avenue Group. 0412 095 201 | 9448 8213 In addition to commemorating that World War I legacy in this centenary Box 65 Hillarys 6923 [email protected] year, Highgate has also helped to propagate that legacy by successfully completing the Remembrance Walk in Kings Park. Warden & Immediate Past President Steve Chamarette We have also provided public access to a Virtual Memorial for Western 0409 257 469 | 9242 1865 Australia. [email protected] Both projects help immortalise the legacy of our forebears, for families Pensions & Veterans Affairs and students and the six million annual visitors to Kings Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Headmark 110 Spring 2003
    Journal of the Australian Naval Institute Spring 2003 AUSTRALIAN NAVAL INSTITUTE The Australian Naval Institute was formed and incorporated in the Australian Capital Territory in 1975. The main objectives of the Institute are: • to encourage and promote the advancement of knowledge related to the Navy and the maritime profession; and • to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas concerning subjects related to the Navy and the maritime profession. The Institute is self-supporting and non-profit-making. Views and opinions expressed in the Journal o/'tlit' Australian Naval Institute are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Institute, the Royal Australian Navy or the Australian Defence Organisation. The aim is to encourage discussion, dissemination of information, comment and opinion and the advancement of professional knowledge concerning naval and maritime matters. PATRON Chief of Navy Vice Admiral Chris Ritchie, AO RAN COUNCIL MEMBERS President Rear Admiral Rowan Moffitt, RAN Vice President Captain Richard Mcnhinick, CSC RAN Secretary Commander Peter Leavy, RAN Treasurer Lieutenant Commander Craig Opie, RAN Journal Kditor Mr Andrew Forbes Councillor Commodore James Goldrick, CSC RAN Councillor Captain Peter Jones, AM RAN Councillor Captain Ray Griggs. CSC RAN Councillor Dr David Stevens Councillor Commander Kevin Codes, RNZN Public Officer Lieutenant Patience Neal, RAN AREA REPRESENTATIVES The following Institute members have agreed to act as points of contact on membership issues and for submitting articles, book reviews
    [Show full text]