SAMPLE Content Directory
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Generation One 1. John Walden Meyers #80201, B. 22 January
Family of John Walden Meyers and Mary Kruger compiled by John A. Brebner for the Friends of Sandbanks 26th October, 2020 Generation One 1. John Walden Meyers #80201, b. 22 January 1745 in Albany County, New York State,1 occupation Military Captain,2 d. 22 November 1821 in Sidney Township, Hastings County, Ontario,1 buried in Whites Cemetery/St. Thomas Cemetery, Belleville.1 . Pioneer Life on the Bay of Quinte, The Meyers Family, pages 20 - 30 "In an old burial ground on an eminence overlooking the Bay, midway between Belleville and Trenton, where lie the ashes of many of the men who built the first log cabins along the front of Sidney, rest the remains of Captain John Walten (sic) Meyers, the founder of Belleville, and the man who erected the first mills in the County of Hastings. Family tradition has it that the old Captain was born in Prussia. Some years before the American Colonies threw off their allegiance, his father left the land of his birth and came with his family to the colony of New York, where he settled on a farm near Poughkeepsie. The family prospered and were in comfortable circumstances when the war broke out. John Walten, our pioneer, had married Polly Kruger, also a native of Prussia; their children were all born on the homestead in New York, where they remained with their mother throughout the war. John's father and other members of his family cast their lots with the rebels, but John himself remained loyal. He took part in with the Tories in organizing a company for service, but being greatly outnumbered by the Revolutionists, they were. -
Publications for Gregory Tolhurst 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Publications for Gregory Tolhurst 2019 High Court of Australia. Journal of Contract Law, 32(3), 203- Pearson, G., Peden, E., Tolhurst, G., Paterson, J., McCracken, 230. S., McNaughton, A., Catterwell, R., Silink, A. (2019). Atkinson, S., Tolhurst, G., Hossain, L. (2015). The Dichotomy Commercial Law: Commentary & Materials - 4th Edition. of Decision Sciences in Information Assurance, Privacy, and Sydney: Thomson Lawbook Co. (Thomson Reuters). Security Applications in Law and Joint Ventures. International 2018 Journal on Advances in Security, 8(3&4), 141-152. <a href="http://www.iariajournals.org/security/sec_v8_n34_2015_p Carter, J., Courtney, W., Tolhurst, G. (2018). Two models for aged.pdf">[More Information]</a> discharge of a contract by repudiation. Cambridge Law Journal, Carter, J., Tolhurst, G. (2015). The Modern Meaning of Joint 77(1), 97-123. <a Venture Terms. In Tony Damian, J.W. Carter (Eds.), Before href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008197317000836">[More You Tie the Knot: Commercial issues in joint venture law, (pp. Information]</a> 75-122). Australia: Ross Parsons Centre of Commercial, 2017 Corporate and Taxation Law. Carter, J., Courtney, W., Tolhurst, G. (2017). An Assimilated McCracken, S., Stumbles, J., Tolhurst, G. (2015). Title Transfer Approach to Discharge for Breach of Contract by Delay. Collateral Arrangements under the Personal Property Securities Cambridge Law Journal, 76(1), 63-86. <a Act 2009 (Cth): Paper I Setting the Scene. Journal of Contract href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008197316000830">[More Law, 33(1), 1-19. Information]</a> McCracken, S., Stumbles, J., Tolhurst, G. (2015). Title Transfer Carter, J., Courtney, W., Tolhurst, G. (2017). Assessment of Collateral Arrangements under the Personal Property Securities Contractual Penalties: Dunlop Deflated. -
Vanalstine #113098. He Married (Unidentified) #113099. Children
Family of Pewter Vanalstine and Alida Vanallen compiled by John A. Brebner for the Friends of Sandbanks 26th October, 2020 Generation One 1. (unidentified) Vanalstine #113098. He married (unidentified) #113099. Children: 2. i. Peter Vanalstine #80096 b. 1747. 3. ii. Cornelius Vanalstine #113100. Generation Two 2. Peter Vanalstine #80096, b. 1747 in Kinderhook, Columbia County, New York, occupation 1775 Blacksmith, occupation Militia Captain, Major, Magistrate, religion Presbyterian (supposedly), d. 02 October 1812 in Adolphustown, Lennox and Addington, Ontario,1 buried in Loyalist Burying Ground, Adolphustown, Lennox and Addington, Ontario. Peter's ancestors emigrated from the Netherlands to New Amsterdam (New York) around 1640. Supported Loyalist cause with General Burgoyne. After that defeat in 1777, and the confiscation of his New York properties, he took refuge in Canada. He returned to British controlled New York City in 1778, where he was awarded the rank of Major with the Associated Loyalists. His family joined him there, and in 1783 they fled, first to Sorel, Quebec via the Hudson River and the Atlantic coast to the St. Lawrence River, and on to Sorel. His wife Alida died at Sorel in 1784. Interestingly, the Vanalstine party appears to have been the only group of Loyalists from New York that chose the sea route from New York, up the coast and up the Saint Lawrence to Sorel. Most of the other Loyalists to Upper Canada chose the inland route; up the Hudson to Albany, the Mohawk and its tributaries to Oswego, and thence across Lake Ontario to Kingston and Prince Edward County. The major advantage of this water passage was that these immigrants could carry far more personal possessions than those relying on the rudimentary trails of the overland route. -
Law Journals: Submissions and Ranking Feedback to Stephanie Miller Explanation Ranking Methodology Combined Score Impact- Factor Currency-Factor
Law Journals: Submissions and Ranking Feedback to Stephanie Miller Explanation Ranking methodology Combined score Impact- factor Currency-factor All Subjects For Editorial R Co CaC Information I Jn C an mb se os A Select left, then All Countries F ls F English non- k . s t English 20 Multi Sep B 11 Jnl-name words arate then General Specialized older surveys C Check create Student-edited Peer-edited Refereed spreadsheet To submit Print Online-only articles to law journals Ranked Non-ranked Submit clear Submit via Rank (e.g. 15,17-25) LexOpus 0.33 ImpF-Weight (0..1) Combi Rank Journal ned 04- 11 1 Harvard Law Review 100 2 Columbia Law Review 85.8 3 The Yale Law Journal 80.3 4 Stanford Law Review 79.3 5 Michigan Law Review 69.5 6 California Law Review 67.2 7 University of Pennsylvania Law 66.6 Review 8 Texas Law Review 66.2 9 Virginia Law Review 65.6 10 Minnesota Law Review 63.9 11 UCLA Law Review 63.4 12 The Georgetown Law Journal 62.8 13 New York University Law 62.7 Review 14 Cornell Law Review 59.8 15 Northwestern University Law 59.7 Review 16 Fordham Law Review 59.5 17 Notre Dame Law Review 56.1 18 Vanderbilt Law Review 51.6 18 William and Mary Law Review 51.6 20 The University of Chicago Law 48.9 Review 21 Iowa Law Review 48.4 22 Boston University Law Review 47.2 23 Duke Law Journal 46.3 24 North Carolina Law Review 41 25 Emory Law Journal 40.7 26 Southern California Law 40.2 Review 27 Cardozo Law Review 39.6 28 Boston College Law Review 38.1 28 The George Washington Law 38.1 Review 30 UC Davis Law Review 36.9 31 Hastings Law Journal -
Empire, Trade, and the Use of Agents in the 19Th Century: the “Reception” of the Undisclosed Principal Rule in Louisiana Law and Scots Law
Louisiana Law Review Volume 79 Number 4 Summer 2019 Article 6 6-19-2019 Empire, Trade, and the Use of Agents in the 19th Century: The “Reception” of the Undisclosed Principal Rule in Louisiana Law and Scots Law Laura Macgregor Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev Part of the Agency Commons, and the Commercial Law Commons Repository Citation Laura Macgregor, Empire, Trade, and the Use of Agents in the 19th Century: The “Reception” of the Undisclosed Principal Rule in Louisiana Law and Scots Law, 79 La. L. Rev. (2019) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol79/iss4/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Empire, Trade, and the Use of Agents in the 19th Century: The “Reception” of the Undisclosed Principal Rule in Louisiana Law and Scots Law Laura Macgregor* TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................. 986 I. The Nature and Economic Benefits of Undisclosed Agency ..................................................................... 992 II. The Concept of a “Mixed Legal System” and Agency Law in Mixed Legal System Scholarship ....................... 997 III. Nature and Historical Development of Scots Law ..................... 1002 A. The Reception of Roman Law ............................................. 1002 B. The Institutional Period and Union with England ............... 1004 C. The Development of Scots Commercial Law ...................... 1006 D. When Did Scots Law Become Mixed in Nature? ................ 1008 IV. Undisclosed and Unidentified Agency in English Law ............ -
Volume 10 (2013) | ISSN 1932-1821 (Print) 1932-1996 (Online) DOI 10.5195/Taxreview.2013.18 |
Volume 10 (2013) | ISSN 1932-1821 (print) 1932-1996 (online) DOI 10.5195/taxreview.2013.18 | http://taxreview.law.pitt.edu This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program, and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press. PITTSBURGH TAX REVIEW Volume 10 Spring 2013 Issue 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLES WHEN ARE DAMAGES TAX FREE?: THE ELUSIVE MEANING OF “PHYSICAL INJURY” Ronald H. Jensen ................................................................... 87 ENTRY-LEVEL ENTREPRENEURS AND THE CHOICE-OF-ENTITY CHALLENGE Emily Ann Satterthwaite ...................................................... 139 NOTE AVOIDING DELEGATION DOCTRINE CHALLENGES TO INTERNET SALES TAX LEGISLATION: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE MAIN STREET FAIRNESS ACT Michael J. Bouey ................................................................. 203 Pitt Tax Review | ISSN 1932-1821 (print) 1932-1996 (online) DOI 10.5195/taxreview.2013.18 | http://taxreview.law.pitt.edu i PITTSBURGH TAX REVIEW Volume 10 Spring 2013 Issue 2 2012 – 2013 EDITORIAL BOARD Senior Editors Michael J. Bouey Editor-in-Chief James Flannery Mirit Eyal-Cohen Anthony C. Infanti Faculty Editor Chief Faculty Editor Faculty Editor Sarah Martin John W. Kettering Executive Editor Production Editor Saheli Chakrabarty Ryan P. Hinsey Jeremiah Vandermark Notes Editor Articles Editors Jennifer Saint-Preux Sarah J. Ratzkin Research Editor Bluebook Editor Managing Editors Ashley Hileman Brian Fraile Sam Pangas Max Slater Kelly Smith Associate Editors Becky Armady Sung Un Kim Sean M. O’Rourke Patrick Carew Frank Kimmel Emily Osgood Jamie L. Davis Sarah Knerr Ryan Perlson Katelyn M. -
To Founding of WI
A Motheris Tragedy Led. To Founding of WI. PBOGBAMME’. Adelaide Hoodless was a to be portrayed in the histori OF THE woman with a vision who ctal pageant, Portraits From in‘e turned a personal tragedy the Past, to be presented SIDNEY SOUTH into a crusade to raise the B01 and VS auditorium out: ' standards of homemaking March 6' at 8.30 p.m. Mrs. Hoodless was a wo- BRANCH W. I. ’4qu throughout Canada. Little did culture and great she realize that her viSion man of HASTINGS WEST personal charm with a know- would grow to a mighty or- gained during an im-i ganization, the Associated ledge, poverished childhood, of the \ Country Women of‘the World, problems of farm women. ‘ comprising Women's Institut- Born near Brantford in 1857, es and similar organizations youngest of a family of 12, of country women in 108 in 1881 and mov- countries. she married Creek, near Adelaide Hoodless She is one of the characters ed to Stoney, Hamilton. There her four ‘3 children were born, and there SEASON 1967 - 1968 her youngest, a .son born in 1888, died in anfancy as the W e | c o m e I result of a disease transmitt- ‘ ed through contaminated MEETING FIRST WEDNESDAY NIGHT I milk. AT 8:15 O'CLOCK It was her remorse at her ,4 lack of knowledge of child care that stirred Mrs. Hood- OPENING ODE less to a crusade to save A goodly thing it is to meet other mothers and babies In friendships circle bright, 3A,, 3 from the same fate. -
Print This Article
Volume 17 (2020) | ISSN 1932-1821 (print) 1932-1996 (online) DOI 10.5195/taxreview.2020.114 | http://taxreview.law.pitt.edu PRIVATE OPERATING FOUNDATION REFORM AND J. PAUL GETTY Khrista McCarden This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program, and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press. PRIVATE OPERATING FOUNDATION REFORM AND J. PAUL GETTY Khrista McCarden* INTRODUCTION The Tax Reform Act of 1969 (“the 1969 Act”) established an arcane form of charitable organization called the private operating foundation.1 Essentially, a private operating foundation is a charitable organization exempt from income tax that in a hierarchical sense is situated between what is known as a public charity and a traditional private foundation. In other words, it is not publicly supported, as are public charities, and thus it is a private foundation; however, it does more than just make grants.2 This form has been subject to countless abuses3 and reform is necessary, especially in the context of private operating foundations that operate art museums (“private art museums”). A recent New York Times article reported that many perceive the ability of wealthy art donors to maintain control over artwork while also receiving tax benefits for varying degrees of public benefit as unfair.4 It is widely accepted that one of the fundamental policies underlying our federal tax system is the notion of fairness.5 Private art museums raise * Hoffman F. -
Volume 18 (2021) | ISSN 1932-1821 (Print) 1932-1996 (Online) DOI 10.5195/Taxreview.2021.137 |
Volume 18 (2021) | ISSN 1932-1821 (print) 1932-1996 (online) DOI 10.5195/taxreview.2021.137 | http://taxreview.law.pitt.edu This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program, and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press. PITTSBURGH TAX REVIEW Volume 18 Spring 2021 Issue 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS REFORMING THE U.S. INTERNATIONAL TAX REGIME Thinking Like a Source State in a Digital Economy Yariv Brauner………..…………………………..................225 The 2021 Corporate Transparency Act: The Next Frontier of U.S. Tax Transparency and Data Debates Diane Ring………………………………………………….249 The Quasi-Global GILTI Tax Susan C. Morse……………………………………………..273 Corporate Tax: Renewed Fiscal Federalism in the USA, the EU, and Globally for the 21st Century Tracy A. Kaye & Michel De Wolf.….………………………301 Beyond the “Made in America Tax Plan”: GILTI and International Tax Cooperation’s Next Golden Age Steven A. Dean……………………...………………….…...341 NOTE NIL Bills—An Examination of the Implications of Compensating College Athletes Under Name, Image, and Likeness Legislation Brian P. Bunner……………..……………………….……..355 Pitt Tax Review | ISSN 1932-1821 (print) 1932-1996 (online) DOI 10.5195/taxreview.2021.137 | http://taxreview.law.pitt.edu i PITTSBURGH TAX REVIEW Volume 18 Spring 2021 Issue 2 2020 – 2021 EDITORIAL BOARD Senior Editors Anthony C. Infanti Chief Faculty Editor Philip Hackney Alice L. Stewart Faculty Editor Faculty Editor Charles Gallmeyer Michaela Quinlan Editor-in-Chief Executive Editor Brenton Sige Luke Shamy Trevor Handlovitch Articles Editor Michael Stafford Notes Editor Bluebook Editors Managing Editors Andrew Calve Michael Mawhinney Associate Editors Carly Bellini Amy Conroy Samuel DeStefano Danielle Harrington Danielle Jacobs Jesse D. -
To Read the Full Client Alert Arbitration Update: a Brief Summary of Recent
Litigation & Arbitration Group Client Alert Arbitration Update: A Brief Summary of Recent Developments in 2020 10 July 2020 Key Contacts Tom Canning Peter Edworthy Vasiliki Katsarou Michael Bingham Partner Associate Associate Associate +44 20.7615.3047 +44 20.7615.3070 +44 20.7615.3282 +44 20.7615.3149 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] In this round-up of recent developments in the London arbitration market during the first half of 2020, we highlight key decisions of the English Court of Appeal in relation to (i) determining the governing law of arbitration agreements and (ii) the extent to which the English courts can make orders against non-parties to arbitration agreements. We also summarise some of the most notable cases (and recently published court statistics) relating to challenges to awards and enforcement proceedings. Finally, we look at some recent developments in the investment treaty arbitration market, including the agreement between EU Member States to terminate intra-EU bilateral investment treaties. Governing law of arbitration agreements There have been two significant Court of Appeal decisions this year, and we await a Supreme Court appeal in relation to one of those decisions, that will hopefully provide some welcome clarity on the English courts’ approach to determining the governing law of an arbitration agreement. First, in January 2020, the Court of Appeal issued its judgment in Kabab-Ji SAL (Lebanon) v Kout Food Group (Kuwait),1 in which it emphasised the primacy -
Speaking for the Dead: Voice in Last Wills and Testaments Karen J
St. John's Law Review Volume 85 Article 12 Issue 2 Volume 85, Spring 2011, Number 2 April 2014 Speaking for the Dead: Voice in Last Wills and Testaments Karen J. Sneddon Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Sneddon, Karen J. (2014) "Speaking for the Dead: Voice in Last Wills and Testaments," St. John's Law Review: Vol. 85: Iss. 2, Article 12. Available at: http://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview/vol85/iss2/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in St. John's Law Review by an authorized administrator of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE SPEAKING FOR THE DEAD: VOICE IN LAST WILLS AND TESTAMENTS KARENJ. SNEDDONt INTRODUCTION ................................. ..... 684 I. FUNCTION OF WILLS ........................... .......685 II. VOICE ..................................... ...... 689 A. Term Defined. ...................... ....... 689 B. Applicability of Voice to Wills ............ ..... 696 C. Pitfalls.......................... ........ 708 D. Benefits ............................ ..... 720 III. VOICE IN WILLS ........................... ..... 728 A. Voice in Non-Attorney Drafted Wills ...... ...... 728 1. Nuncupative Wills ................. ...... 729 2. Ethical Wills...... ................. 729 3. Holographic Wills .................. ..... 732 4. Commercial Fill-in-the-Blank Forms and -
RDO 44.2 Int.Indd
311 Revisiting the Self-Authorizing Agent BRIAN M STUDNIBERG* This article considers the concept of a “self-authorizing” Dans cet article, on examine le concept d’agent « auto- agent given modern forms of commercial dealings, autorisé » dans le cadre des formes modernes de particularly those involving projects characterized by tran sactions commerciales, particulièrement celles extensive functional specialization. The article begins qui ont trait à des projets caractérisés par une vaste 2013 CanLIIDocs 155 by reviewing Canadian Laboratory Supplies and, more spécialisation fonctionnelle. Dans cet article, l’auteur specifi cally, Chief Justice Laskin’s dissenting opinion at commence par examiner l’arrêt Canadian Laboratory the Supreme Court as the starting point for revisiting Supplies et, en particulier, l’opinion dissidente du juge the self-authorization question in Canadian agency law. en chef Laskin à la Cour suprême à l’époque, comme The article then considers two recent cases decided point de départ pour revisiter la question de l’auto- at the Federal Court of Appeal before extending their autorisation dans le droit de la représentation au facts to contemplate a hypothetical (but perhaps not Canada. L’article se penche ensuite sur deux arrêts far-fetched) illustration of how the problem might que la Cour d’appel fédérale a récemment jugés avant arise in a contemporary setting involving public infra- de les appliquer à leurs faits pour fi nalement aboutir structure procurement. With this scenario in mind, à une illustration hypothétique (sans pour autant être the case law on apparent and implied authority is exa- utopique) de la manière dont le problème pourrait mined with reference to the prospect of agent self- surgir dans un cadre contemporain impliquant des authorization.