Family and Fertility Policies in the Soviet Union and Modern Russia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Family and Fertility Policies in the Soviet Union and Modern Russia A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Selezneva, Ekaterina Working Paper Struggling for new lives: Family and fertility policies in the Soviet Union and modern Russia IOS Working Papers, No. 355 Provided in Cooperation with: Leibniz Institute for East and Southeast European Studies (IOS), Regensburg Suggested Citation: Selezneva, Ekaterina (2016) : Struggling for new lives: Family and fertility policies in the Soviet Union and modern Russia, IOS Working Papers, No. 355, Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung (IOS), Regensburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/148912 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Arbeitsbereich Ökonomie IOS Working Papers No. 355 April 2016 Struggling for new lives: Family and fertility policies in the Soviet Union and modern Russia Ekaterina Selezneva * * Institute for Eastern and Southeastern European Studies (IOS Regensburg), Landshter Str. 4, 93059 Regensburg, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Landshuter Straße 4 D-93047 Regensburg Telefon: (09 41) 943 54-10 Telefax: (09 41) 943 54-27 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.ios-regensburg.de ISSN: 2199-9465 Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................... v 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 2. 1917 – 1991: Soviet period .................................................................................... 3 2.1 1917 – beginning of the 1930s: political mobilization of women ................... 3 2.2 The1930s – mid-1950s: development of the ‘Soviet family’ concept ............ 6 2.3 Mid-1950s – the mid-1960s: Khrushchev Thaw ......................................... 11 2.4 The 1970s: completion of the system of benefits to families ...................... 12 2.5 1981 – 1983: fertility stimulation ................................................................. 14 2.6 Second half of the 1980s: further benefits for working mothers ................. 17 2.7 1989–1991: regional specifics in fertility stimulation ................................... 18 3. 1992 – 2015: Modern Russia ............................................................................... 22 3.1 1992 – 2000: children’s welfare takes priority ............................................ 22 3.2 2000: Demographic policy until 2015 – combating the demographic crisis .. 24 3.3 Second half of the 2000s: birth certificate and maternity capital ................ 26 3.4 2007–2010: Program of demographic development until 2025, Stage I ....... 29 3.5 2011–2015: Program of demographic development until 2025, Stage II ...... 32 4. Concluding remarks ............................................................................................. 37 References ................................................................................................................. 39 iii Struggling for new lives Abstract During the 20th century, Russian women were assigned the triple role of social and political activists, workers, caregivers and mothers. This paper makes an overview of the main steps undertaken first by the Soviet and later by the modern Russian governments to influence family formation models and fertility levels, in order to improve the demographic situation over the period from 1917 until 2015. The overview pays close attention to such measures of demographic policy as marriage and divorce regulation, support of families through family benefits and the tax system, reconciliation of family and work spheres (maternity/paternity leaves, workplace flexibility measures), fertility promotion, childbearing and childcare support, as well as rare reproductive health protection initiatives. JEL-Classification: J12, J13, J18, P30 Keywords: fertility, Russia, family policy I wish to acknowledge the financial support and hospitality of the Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University (Tokyo) during my visiting research stay that was used for the preparation of this text. I am grateful to Kazuhiro Kumo and Serfima Chirkova for their comments and suggestions. v Struggling for new lives 1. Introduction The roots of the modern demographic situation in Russia go back deeper in history than the dissolution of the Soviet Union. In the 20th century, often overlapping periods of revolution, civil and world wars, famines and purges have induced a permanent lack of population resources as well as the existence of pronounced demographic waves. These waves were often amplified by policies targeting family life and fertility. From the very foundation of the Soviet states, significant efforts were made to promote the autonomy of women as individuals, and their ability to support themselves economically, while never leaving out of focus their reproductive function. Soviet ideology brought about revolutionary change to models of family formation and the upbringing of children. During the 20th century, Russian women were assigned the triple role of social and political activists, workers, caregivers and mothers. While the relative significance of these different roles changed through the century the identity of men as defenders of the Motherland and of being the main breadwinners remained rather more stable. By the end of the 1960s, a masculinity crisis had hit the country and the motto “Take care of men!” (“Beregite muzhchin!”) was promoted. Contemporaneously, women continued elaborating strategies to cope with the burden of multiple responsibilities (worker/mother- caregiver), thus either asking for help among relatives, or giving birth to a smaller number of children. It was also in the mid-1960s, when – as Vishnevsky (2009) notes – a process of depopulation began. According to Vishnevsky, a latent depopulation stage continued up to the moment of the dissolution of the Soviet Union (a sub-period characterized by the decrease of the total fertility rate below the replacement fertility level of 2.15), then through an evident depopulation stage up until the mid-2000s (a sub-period characterized by the total number of deaths outnumbering the total amount of births), and then developed into the depopulation aggravation stage (characterized by a decrease in the number of women in a reproductive age since 2004, and a decrease of the working age population since 2007; apart from some short- term reversals of the trends due to favourable dynamics linked to demographic waves). Under this context, we will make an overview of the main steps undertaken first by the Soviet and later by the modern Russian governments to influence family formation models and fertility levels, in order to improve the demographic situation over the period from 1917 until 2015. While up-to-the-date literature contains a handful of studies of historical and modern fertility trends, only scattered facts on the underlying governmental policies can be found, especially in English. The current text provides the first long-term systematic overview of the legislation acts regulating fertility and the family sphere in the Soviet Union and modern Russia. The state(s) struggled with comparatively low fertility and high mortality throughout the last century. However the difference 1 IOS Working Paper No. 355 in the state’s attitude (ideology) and its financial capacity in addressing the demographic issues has changed dramatically. Thus we address the Soviet Union and the modern periods in two separate sections. After tracing the course of the demographic policy, we further group the evidence into politically and ideologically more homogeneous sub-periods. The overview also pays close attention to such measures of demographic policy as marriage and divorce regulation, support of families through family benefits and the tax system, reconciliation of family and work spheres (maternity/paternity leaves, workplace flexibility measures), fertility promotion, childbearing and childcare support, as well as rare reproductive health protection initiatives1. The current text provides evidence on the demographic policies chronologically, from the October revolution of 1917 up until the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 in Section 2, and from the creation of the modern Russia in 1991 to 2015, in Section 3. The last section briefly summarizes the main characteristics of the demographic policies of the two
Recommended publications
  • 1 Adcmemorial.Org Alternative Report on the Russian Federation's
    adcmemorial.org Alternative Report on the Russian Federation’s Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Connection with the Consideration of the Sixth Periodic State Report (2016) by the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights For the Pre-Sessional Working Group of the 60th Session of the CESCR 27 February – 3 March 2017 года The Russian Federation: Violation of the Economic and Social Rights of Roma and Indigenous Minorities; Employment Discrimination against Vulnerable Groups 1 CONTENTS PREAMBLE……………………………………………………………………………………………….3 VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS OF ROMA AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES……………………….4 Problem: demolition of housing in dense Roma settlements, eviction of residents, deprivation of access to resources………………………………………………………………….4 Problem: violation of the rights of Roma children to education – segregation into separate “Roma” classes and schools, difficulties accessing preschool education, lack of educational opportunities for people who left or never attended school at all for various reasons………………………………………………………………………………………….6 Problem: absence of a comprehensive government strategy to overcome structural discrimination of the Roma population in the Russian Federation……………………………7 Problem: violation of the economic, social and cultural rights of indigenous peoples – seizure of territories where these peoples traditionally live and maintain their households by mining and oil and gas companies; removal of self-government bodies of indigenous peoples; repression of activists and employees of social organizations, including the fabrication of criminal cases………………………………………………………………………….7 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION OF VULNERABLE GROUPS……………………………….11 Problem: the existence of the “list of professions banned for women” results in employment discrimination against women; the Russian Federation is not implementing the recommendations and rulings of international institutions (CEDAW) to abolish this list.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sentinal Appeared Carrying One of Goering's Fine Leather Cases. 'I
    A sentinal appeared carrying one of Goering’s fine leather cases. ’I felt you should see this, sir.’ He opened it to reveal the big- gest collection of pills I had ever seen in my life. There were approximately twenty thousand pills in the case that Goering claimed were for a heart ailment. He would take them by the handfull, 20 in the morning and 20 at night. They were Paracodin a German syn- thetic drug used when morphine was not available. Also found among his clothes and personal effects were several ’tiny vials of Potas- sium Cyanide’. Examined each vial had enough cyanide to bring in- stant death to a dozen men. One of these vials, Goering managed to keep concealed for over a year until he committed "suicide with it only hours before he was to be hanged. "As well as his ’secret weapons’, Herr Goering’s valuables listed on the inventory and deposited under lock and key in the Gun room, were: 1 gold Luftwaffe badge; 1 gold Luftwaffe badge with diamonds; 1 deskwatch; 1 travelling clock by Movado; I large personal toilet case; 1 gold cigarette case, inlaid with amethyst and monogrammed by Prince Paul of Yugoslavia; 1 silver pill-box; 1 gold and velvet cigar-case; 1 square watch by Cartier, set with diamonds; 1 gold chain, gold pencil and cutter; 3 keys; 1 emerald ring; 1 diamond ring; 1 ruby ring; 1 semi-precious buttons; 1 small eagle with di- amond chips; 1 diamond A/C brooch; 4 cuff-links with semi-precious stones; 1 gold pin (evergreen twig); 1 pearl stick-pin; 1 gold stick- pin with swastika of diamond chips; 1 watch fob (platinum,
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Dated 12 June 2001
    TAX CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN June 12, 2001 Table of Contents PART I. GENERAL ....................................................................................................... 20 SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS ......................................................................... 20 CHAPTER 1. General Provisions ................................................................................. 20 Article 1. Relations regulated by the Tax Code ........................................................ 20 Article 2. Tax legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan ......................................... 20 Article 3. Jurisdiction of tax legislation .................................................................... 20 Article 4. Principles of Taxation in the Republic of Kazakhstan ............................. 20 Article 5. The Principle of Obligation of Taxation ................................................... 20 Article 6. The Principle of Certainty of Taxation ..................................................... 21 Article 7. Equity Principle of Taxation ..................................................................... 21 Article 8. The Unity Principle of Tax System .......................................................... 21 Article 9. The Publicity Principle of Tax Legislation ............................................... 21 Article 10. Definitions ......................................................................................... 21 CHAPTER 2. Rights and obligations of a taxpayer and a tax agent. Representation
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation 2012
    RUSSIAN FEDERATION 2012 Short-term prognosis RUSSIAN FEDERATION 2012 Short-term prognosis Editors: Karmo Tüür & Viacheslav Morozov Editors: Karmo Tüür & Viacheslav Morozov Editor of “Politica” series: Rein Toomla Copyright: Individual authors, 2012 ISSN 1736–9312 Tartu University Press www.tyk.ee CONTENT Introduction ..................................................................................... 7 Evaluation of the last prognosis. Erik Terk ...................................... 9 INTERNAL DEVELOPMENTS Political system. Viacheslav Morozov .............................................. 21 Legal system. Aleksey Kartsov .......................................................... 26 Economy. Raivo Vare ...................................................................... 30 Energy sector. Andres Mäe .............................................................. 35 The Russian Military. Kaarel Kaas ................................................. 40 The political role of the Russian Orthodox Church. Alar Kilp ...... 45 Mass media development. Olga Chepurnaya ................................. 49 Civil society. Zhanna Chernova ...................................................... 54 Demography of the regions. Aimar Altosaar ................................... 58 Nationalities policy of Russia. Konstantin Zamyatin ...................... 62 Center – Northern Caucasus. Nona Shahnazarian ....................... 67 Foreign relations of Russian regions. Eero Mikenberg .................... 71 EXTERNAL RELATIONS Russia and the WTO. Kristjan
    [Show full text]
  • Raisa Gorbacheva, the Soviet Union’S Only First Lady
    Outraging the People by Stepping out of the Shadows Gender roles, the ‘feminine ideal’ and gender discourse in the Soviet Union and Raisa Gorbacheva, the Soviet Union’s only First Lady. Noraly Terbijhe Master Thesis MA Russian & Eurasian Studies Leiden University January 2020, Leiden Everywhere in the civilised world, the position, the rights and obligations of a wife of the head of state are more or less determined. For instance, I found out that the President’s wife in the White House has special staff to assist her in preforming her duties. She even has her own ‘territory’ and office in one wing of the White House. As it turns out, I as the First Lady had only one tradition to be proud of, the lack of any right to an official public existence.1 Raisa Maximovna Gorbacheva (1991) 1 Translated into English from Russian. From: Raisa Gorbacheva, Ya Nadeyus’ (Moscow 1991) 162. 1 Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Literature review ........................................................................................................................... 9 3. Gender roles and discourse in Russia and the USSR ................................................................. 17 The supportive comrade ................................................................................................................. 19 The hardworking mother ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Family Law in the Light of Russian History and Marxist Theory Harold J
    SOVIET FAMILY LAW IN THE LIGHT OF RUSSIAN HISTORY AND MARXIST THEORY HAROLD J. BERMAN" To maintain an equilibrium between change and continuity is a crucial problem for modem -society, and one which "has confronted Soviet Russia during the past decade in an acute form. The Revolu- tion, which set out to annihilate everything that belonged to the past, has come to terms with the pre-revolutionary Russian heritage. If only to preserve the new, it has been found necessary to restore some- thing of the old. And this, in turn, has involved a revaluation of the Marxist doctrines upon which the Revolution is founded. Particularly in Soviet family law, there has been within the last 10 years a partial restoration of pre-revolutionary traditions and a partial restatement of Marxist principles. By investigating the backgrounds of Russian history and Marxist theory, we may be in a position prop- erly to understand these developments. PRE-REVOLUTIONARY RuSSIAN FAMILY LAW The first written law of Russian history begins with the rules of the blood-feud. I Such law testifies to a public order which existed, when it did exist, only as between families, but which was powerless to reach down into the internal relationships of a household. At best, it Was inter-family law-analogous perhaps to our modem international law. Within the family there was only the law of that family, determined by tribal custom. 2 The first Russian chronicle tells of incestuous marriage, wife-capture, general promiscuity.3 For the husband there was com- plete freedom of divorce, while the wife was not released from marriage even by the death of her husband but had to follow him into the next world.
    [Show full text]
  • EQUALITY and NON-DISCRIMINATION in RUSSIA Best Practice Guide for Lawyers
    EQUALITY AND NON-DISCRIMINATION IN RUSSIA Best Practice Guide for Lawyers Practical Guide for lawyers advising victims of discrimination on the grounds of sex and gender, religion or belief, race and ethnicity, disability and sexual orientation and gender identity EQUAL RIGHTS TRUST Table of Contents Acknowledgements Acronyms Introduction . 1 Part One: Experience of Groups Exposed to Discrimination in Russia . 3 Part Two: Equality and Non-Discrimination . 9 Part Three: Laws That Protect Equality and Non-discrimination . 11 Part Four: Key Human Rights Issues that Affect Persons Suffering Discrimination in Russia . 22 Part Four (a) Discriminatory Violence . 22 Part Four (b) “Hate Speech” . 31 Part Four (c) Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Assembly and Freedom Association . 36 Part Four (d) Right to Respect for Private and Family Life . 49 Part Four (e) Employment, Healthcare and Education . 56 Part Four (e)(i) Right to Work . 59 Part Four (e)(ii) Right to Health . 65 Part Four (e)(iii) Right to Education . 70 Part Four (f) Participation in Political and Public Life . 75 Part Four (g) Discrimination by State Agents . 80 Part Five: Legal Strategies for Ensuring Access to Justice for Victims of Discrimination . 91 Part Six: Best Practice in Information and Legal Advice to victims of discrimination . 122 Resources for Lawyers Working with Victims of Discrimination . 124 Acknowledgements This Guide has been produced as part of a long-term initiative by the Equal Rights Trust which is aimed at improving access to justice for victims of discrimination in Russia . The Guide expands upon the Equal Rights Trust’s Best Practice Guide for Lawyers, pub- lished in March 2017, which was designed to support Russian lawyers to provide best prac- tice legal information and advice to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) clients and ensure that LGBT+ persons enjoy equal access to justice .
    [Show full text]
  • Russia 2030 Based on Contracts Russia 2030 Based on Contracts
    Russia 2030 based on contracts Russia 2030 Based On Contracts EDITORS: Osmo Kuusi Hanna Smith Paula Tiihonen Chair of Steering Group: Päivi Lipponen, MP ISBN 978-951-53-3305-6 (paperback) • ISBN 978-951-53-3306-3 (PDF) Publication of the Committ ee for the Future 6/2010 Cover illustration: Wäinö Aaltonen, The Future, 1932/1969. Bronze. Parliament of Finland, Assembly Chamber Photo: Vesa Lindqvist/Parliament of Finland. The Committee for the Future Parliament of Finland Phone (09) 4321 Fax (09) 432 2140 [email protected] www.eduskunta.fi 1. edition ISBN 978-951-53-3305-6 (paperback) ISBN 978-951-53-3306-3 (PDF) RUSSIA 2030 BASED ON CONTRACTS Editors: Osmo Kuusi Hanna Smith Paula Tiihonen Chair of Steering Group: Päivi Lipponen, MP Publication of the Committee for the Future 6/2010 To the Reader The Committee for the Future found the Russia scenarios that it had drafted during the previ- ous parliamentary term valuable and decided that that they needed to be updated. The “Russia 2017: three scenarios” report published in 2007 served as background material and provided a source of stimuli for this work. Examined in the report are both the progress of modernisation in Russia and prospects for the economy all they way up to 2030. A new approach in this work of updating and forecasting has been to seek visions of and scenario themes for development in Russia through a “neighbourly relations in the future” assessment. To deepen its expertise on cross-border neighbourly relations, the Committee visited Imatra and Svetogorsk on 23.4.2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution No. 1102 of the Government of the Republic Of
    Annex 28 Government Resolution No. 1102 as of 28 October 2004 On Draft Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Amendments and Addenda to Legal Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Intellectual Property Rights Issues" The Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan RESOLVES: Submit Draft Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Amendments and Addenda to Legal Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Intellectual Property Rights Issues" to Mazhilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan for consideration. Prime Minister, Republic of Kazakhstan Draft Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Amendments and Addenda to Legal Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Intellectual Property Rights Issues" Article 1. Make changes and addenda to the following legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan: 1. Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan as of 16 July 1997 (Newsletter of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Nos. 15-16, 1997, p. 211; 1998, No. 16, p. 219; No. 17-18, p. 225; 1999, No. 20, p. 721; No. 21, p. 774; 2000, No. 6, p. 141; 2001, No. 8, p. 53, 54; 2002, No. 4, p. 32, 33; No. 10, p. 106; No. 17, p. 155; No. 23-24, p. 192; 2003, No. 15, p. 137; No. 18, p. 142; 2004, No. 5, p. 22; No. 17, p. 37): 1) add words ", except for article 184 and 184-1 herein" after words "this article" in paragraph 2 of comments to article 175; 2) set article 184 as follows: "Article 184. Infringement of Copyright and Related Rights 1. Usurpation of the authorship or coercion into joint authorship shall result in - fines equal to 100-500 monthly calculation indexes, or to the amount of wages or other income received by the convict for a period of one to five months, or in public works from 100 to 180 hours, or in a prison term of up to two years, if the action was performed with the view to receive profits and resulted in severe damages.
    [Show full text]
  • British, Russian and World Medals Orders and Decorations
    British, Russian and World Medals Orders and Decorations To be sold by auction at: Sotheby’s, in the Upper Grosvenor Gallery The Aeolian Hall, Bloomfield Place New Bond Street London W1 Day of Sale: Wednesday 10 June 2009 at 10.00 am Public viewing: 45 Maddox Street, London W1S 2PE Thursday 4 June 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Friday 5 June 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Monday 8 June 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Tuesday 9 June Limited viewing – please call for an appointment. Or by previous appointment. Please note that early viewing is encouraged. Catalogue no. 38 Price £10 Enquiries: James Morton or Paul Wood Cover illustrations: Lot 1342 (front); Lot 1095 (back); vide Lot 1264 (inside front cover, portrait reproduced by kind permission of Cheshire Archive and Local Studies); Lot 1114 (inside back cover) in association with 45 Maddox Street, London W1S 2PE Tel.: +44 (0)20 7493 5344 Fax: +44 (0)20 7495 6325 Email: [email protected] Website: www.mortonandeden.com This auction is conducted by Morton & Eden Ltd. in accordance with our Conditions of Business printed at the back of this catalogue. All questions and comments relating to the operation of this sale or to its content should be addressed to Morton & Eden Ltd. and not to Sotheby’s. Important Information for Buyers All lots are offered subject to Morton & Eden Ltd.’s Conditions of Business and to reserves. Estimates are published as a guide only and are subject to review. The actual hammer price of a lot may well be higher or lower than the range of figures given and there are no fixed “starting prices”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Orthodox Church and Atheism
    TEUVO LAITILA The Russian Orthodox Church and atheism Introduction After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the mate, atheism has little chance of thriving, whereas religious tide in Russia has been quick to rise. Dur- there is a sort of ‘social demand’ for its critique. ing the Soviet era, religion – particularly Orthodox In what follows I therefore focus on what the Rus- Christianity and Islam – was considered to be one sian Orthodox Church (ROC) has had to say about of the ‘enemies of the people’. Since the late 1990s atheism and how her statements can be related to a however, Russian politicians at all levels of the power break with the past and the construction of a new structure have associated themselves either with the Russia. Or, in my opinion, actually deleting the So- Orthodox, or on some occasions with the Muslim, viet period from the history of Russia as an error and clergy. The present state of affairs in the relations seeing present-day Russia as a direct continuation of between religion and the state are well illustrated by the pre-Soviet imperial state. the cordial liaison of the late Patriarch Aleksii II with Despite speaking in the ‘name’ of the ROC, I, of President Vladimir Putin and the equally warm in- course, have selected some influential, visible and volvement of President Dmitry Medvedev, and his well-known persons as spokesmen of the Church. I wife Svetlana Medvedeva, with the new Patriarch do not aim to suggest that opinion within the ROC Kirill, who was elected in January 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Stability, Security and Prosperity
    BRICS Contributors include Tejendra Khanna Sudhir Vyas Sergey Lavrov NEW D Nursultan Nazarbayev Michel Sidibé Vadim Lukov Jim O’Neill Yoginder Alagh Maxim Medvedkov E LHI SUMMIT 2012 Yu Yongding João Pontes Nogueira Francis Kornegay Prabeer Basu Nitin Desai Alexander Bedritsky NEW dElhi SUMMiT 2012 Stability, security and prosperity BRICS cover_FINAL.indd 1 8/3/12 20:36:37 HSBC.indd 2 1/3/12 10:31:43 HSBC.indd 3 1/3/12 10:31:44 NEW dElhi SUMMiT 2012 Editors Marina Larionova, John Kirton Deputy editors Madeline Koch, Mark Rakhmangulov Guest editor Yoginder Alagh Researcher Andrey Shelepov Editor-in-chief Colette Doyle Managing editor Barry Davies Sub-editors Clare Cronin, Erica Moss Art editors Jean-Philippe Stanway, James White Designer Kylie Alder Production and distribution manager Malcolm Green Sales director Martin Cousens Managing director Andrew Howard Chief executive Alan Spence Chairman Paul Duffen Pictures: Getty, Press Association, Reuters ISBN: 978-1-906940-51-5 Printed by Buxton Press Published by Newsdesk Communications Ltd 130 City Road, London EC1V 2NW, UK Tel: +44 (0) 20 7650 1600 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7650 1609 Newsdesk Media Inc 700 12th Street NW, Washington DC 20005, US Tel: +1 (202) 904 2423 Fax: +1 (202) 904 2424 In cooperation with the BRICS Research Group Higher School of Economics and University of Toronto, www.newsdeskmedia.com 1 Devonshire Place, Room 209N, Toronto ON M5S 3K7 Newsdesk Media Group publishes a wide range of business and Canada customer publications. For further information please contact Tel: +1 (416) 946 8953 Alan Spence, chief executive, or Paul Duffen, chairman.
    [Show full text]