Longdon Neighbourhood Plan 2017 2029 Revisions

Longdon Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2017-2029

Submission Draft November 2017

Foreword

This draft Plan is submitted to Lichfield District Council (as the local planning authority) under regulation 15 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations, 2012, having been revised following pre-submission consultation undertaken during the summer of 2016.

Details of the consultation process, stretching back to 2013 (following the Area Designation), are contained in the Consultation Statement submitted with this Plan.

This document has been produced by a working group of Longdon Parish Council, seeking to prepare land use guidance for Longdon Parish. The final version (amended if necessary, following examination) will become the Neighbourhood Plan for the whole of Longdon Parish. If successful at a Parish wide referendum, it will become a key part of the planning framework of Lichfield District Council, to help those making future decisions on land use investments and planning applications.

Contents

Foreword 3 Contents 4 Introduction 5 What a Neighbourhood Plan is 6 Setting the Scene 8 The Vision 10 Planning Policy Context 12 The Policies

Landscape and the Built Environment 14 Housing 20 Movement 22 Community Facilities and Leisure 24 The Rural Economy and Infrastructure 26

Delivery 28

Introduction

The opportunity to have a Neighbourhood Plan, and to reap the powerful benefits s it can provide, has been eagerly grasped by the residents of Longdon Parish. In responding to initial questionnaires, at many public meetings and briefings to Parish organisations, residents clearly indicated their support for, and wish to have a say in, the future of their home Parish.

Over 90% of respondents identified with the Parish, enjoying the rural setting, the beauty, the tranquility, and with a clearly expressed desire to want to help shape any physical change in the area over the next 12 years.

Maintaining the status quo is the ‘comfort option’. However, this valid stance can quickly lead to complacency, as stagnation sets in and villages ossify. Instead, small managed change can maintain vitality, family groups, and integration. This plan provides for that. In short:

“Enjoy continuity, accommodate change.”

What a Neighbourhood plan is

A Neighbourhood Plan, introduced under the Localism Act, gives to members of the community a “hands-on” role in the physical planning of their neighbourhood. It grants strong rights and powers, which allow the community to have a say as to the land use and shape of any new developments – housing, facilities, infrastructure, conservation. By joining together to share a common vision, the community can help create the policies it wants, for where residents live, work and play.

It has a strength not hitherto enjoyed, based on its origin in community aspirations. It will be a statutory document, part of the local authority’s Local Development Framework, to be observed and adhered to by developers, and will be instrumental in the determination of planning applications for the area.

Benefits of the An adopted Neighbourhood Plan, will enable Longdon Parish Neighbourhood Council (the Parish Council) to have Planning process increased influence and leverage in dealings with; Having a Neighbourhood Plan in place: • Lichfield District Council (the District Council). • Ensures that the Parish communities are involved in any • Staffs County Council (the land use decisions which affect County Council). them. • Landowners and developers. • Helps meet the foremost local needs and wishes. • Infrastructure organisations/ utility providers in land use • Recognises what is precious matters affecting Longdon Parish to the residents, workers and (the Parish). visitors in the Parish.

• Helps safeguard the Parish villages and hamlets from uncontrolled piecemeal development.

• Influences the type and style of allowable development.

• Supports the provision of, or improvement to, village facilities.

Setting the scene

Longdon is a rural Parish lying on creating fields for farmland. The and taxes prompted a move to the north-western boundary of Bishops of Lichfield held the manor their other ancestral home at Plas Lichfield District. It is predominantly of Longdon up to 1546, when it was Newydd, Anglesey, Wales. The 6th Green Belt farmland abutting surrendered to Henry VIII. In the Marquis sold 2000 acres of the land, Cannock Chase. same year, ownership was granted giving villagers the opportunity to to Sir William Paget, an ancestor of buy or build their homes. He also Within the Plan area there are four the Marquis of Anglesey. commenced the demolition of the main settlements, namely Longdon, Hall, parts of which can be found Upper Longdon, Longdon Green In 1563, Longdon was recorded as locally in Abbots Bromley and as far and Gentleshaw, which are having 102 households, which had away as Austrailia. identified in the District Local Plan’s grown to 178 by 1665. Population hierarchy of settlements as increase continued, with records Sir Villiers- Forster gave funds to ‘other rural.’ The small villages are showing that by 1851, there were erect a community hall in 1919, to inset into the Green Belt. 1183 inhabitants, 4452 acres of celebrate the allied victory in the land, a number of small hamlets, Great War. The A51 runs south east to north and several gentlemen’s seats. This through the Parish, passing to the included Beaudesert, the residence A dispersed settlement pattern east of Longdon Green, west of of the Marquees of Anglesey, and remains the dominant landscape Longdon and to the north of Upper Lysways Hall, home of the Villiers- feature across the Parish, although Longdon. The highway gives good Forster family. most of the villages have seen access to the A38, M6 and M6 some development during the 20th Toll; the remainder of the roads The Marquees lived at Beaudesert century, especially in Longdon and within the area are rural. The West Hall until 1919, when family debts Upper Longdon. Coast Main Line railway runs to the east of the Parish, with stations at Lichfield and Rugeley, providing regular services to London and the north- west. HS2 will make a visual impact West Coast on part of the Parish. Upper Main Line Railway Longdon Longdon Our history The Parish has been mostly rural ase A51 rt throughout history. Up to the Longdon Bronze Age, the area was heavily Green wooded. Gradual clearance during the Bronze and Iron Ages allowed the development of farmsteads and dispersed settlements. The Iron Age fort at Castle Ring to the west of the Parish, would have defended the surrounding area, providing protection to local residents, their livestock and produce. Gentleshaw

There is little evidence of any material increase in population until the 14th Century when, due to the influence of the Church, Longdon became a manor in its own right. Bishops were active in enhancing Longdon Neighbourhood Boundary the economic productivity of the © Crown Copyright. Database Rights 2015, Lichfield District Council. Licence No : 100017765 area by clearing the woodland and not to scale

The Parish today Sites of Biological Importance (SBI) Today, the Parish has become an The 2011 Census records 1,505 are located at: aspirational place in which to live. people (647 households) living in A higher than normal percentage Longdon Parish. There are two • Georges Hayes, Piggots Bottom of elderly residents reflects that Church of England churches, five and Square Covert. desirability, choosing to remain pubs, a shop and post office, two in the family home after children • Longdon Hall / School. state Primary schools, two private have grown up and left. However, because of the ease of access to schools and four community • Longdon Green. halls. There are many clubs and the ‘A’ road and rail network, and the proximity to larger areas of societies run via the halls, and in • A51 road embankment at Cleat employment, such as Lichfield, terms of sport Longdon Cricket Hill. Birmingham, Stafford, Burton Club currently play ‘club’ cricket at on Trent, and wider afield, the the Red Lion Ground in Longdon • Morry Meadow. Green. Parish has increasingly become a ‘dormitory’ area. The Parish contains 4 Grade II* • An area immediately to the west and 27 Grade II listed properties. of the A51 (Longdon village). Longdon Green is the only designated Historic Conservation Area within the Parish. Castle Ring, a Scheduled Ancient Monument abuts the south-western boundary of the Parish. The Parish adjoins Cannock Chase, a biologically and historically important landscape that can be traced back thousands of years – long before it became known as a royal hunting area. It is designated as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and a Special Area of Conservation (SAC). It also falls within the Forest of Mercia boundary, only one of ten such forests of significance in the country. Gentleshaw Common, a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), is also within the Plan area. The Common is an area of lowland heathland - one of the largest surviving areas of this much reduced habitat in Staffordshire. There are a number of priority species which directly benefit from the sites statutory protection, including the ‘Adder’, ‘Common Lizard’, ‘Tree Pipit’, ‘Nightjar’, ‘Woodlark’, ‘Neglected’ and ‘Heath Rustic’ moths, ground nesting solitary bees and wasps, ‘Small Bordered Fritillary’ butterflies and the ‘Bog Bush Cricket’.

The Vision

Following the initial gathering of ‘Longdon Parish will continue to be a collection of rural villages where ideas and opinions at the many people aspire to live. consultation events held through

2013/2014, five major themes The principal settlements of Longdon, Longdon Green, Upper emerged; Longdon and Gentleshaw, will retain their individual identities, with

any respectful, small scale development designed in such a way as • People like living in a rural area to integrate into the village’s character, helping to strengthen their and that the character of the sustainability. Acknowledging the special nature of living adjacent villages (and Parish in general) is to Cannock Chase, the Neighbourhood Plan will ensure that what very important. residents enjoy about the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty is

maintained and enhanced. • problems with traffic (its speed

and volume) pose a danger to all Measures to address concerns regarding the volume and speed of road users. traffi c travelling through the villages will be considered to improve

overall safety for all road users. Public and community transport links to • large scale housing development and from the villages will also be considered. is not wanted.

The design, appearance, scale and massing of any new development, • improved community facilities will be carefully woven into the fabric of the villages, in a sustainable would be welcomed. way that adds to the local rural feel of the area.

• whilst some change may Community cohesion and integration is a critical element of the Plan. be necessary to secure The balanced community, will see young families living alongside older improvements, residents want to residents, who have enjoyed and cherished the peace and beauty of the be able to influence that change. area for many years. The need for additional community facilities will be reviewed and, if appropriate, created.

Taking on board those messages, Agricultural and equine activities are key features in the Parish. Support the Parish Council-led Working for local employment opportunities in this sector will be contained Group drafted the VISION within this Plan, provided they sympathetically enhance, and do not statement (set out in the flyer detract from, the appearance of the landscape.’ delivered to all properties in the Parish and considered at community engagement events in June and July 2014), encapsulating the general feelings regarding land use in the Parish over the next 15 years;

Principles and objectives inappropriate development that homes for young families or Based upon the VISION, the would impact negatively on the the elderly, in suitable and Principles and Objectives were also environment of these Areas of sustainable locations within our consulted upon in 2014. Following Outstanding Natural Beauty. village boundaries, so that future that, they have been further residents will have access to defined, to provide for sustainable 3. We will strive to ensure that public transport, shopping and growth, maintaining traditional the community facilities and recreational provision. values in a modern setting - amenities are appropriate managing change whilst respecting for the needs of the Parish, 6. If in the future development is our heritage. allowing residents of all ages necessary, to enable the the opportunity to take part in villages to remain sustainable, activities that lead to a sense any new development (in terms Please note, the numbering of the of individual and/or community of their individual or collective Principles and Objectives are not well-being. appearance) must respect in any priority order – they are the local Staffordshire rural equally important. 4. Should any minor amendment vernacular, or be of a high quality to village boundaries be contemporary design and be 1. We will retain and enhance our required to accommodate fully integrated into the village green spaces and the Green Belt small scale growth for local settlement. Regardless of past to ensure we avoid the merging people, it must acknowledge development layouts, culs-de- of Longdon/Longdon Green with the character of the village sac are not considered to be in Armitage, Upper Longdon with and be a logical extension keeping with this principle. Brereton, and Gentleshaw with to the existing footprint. Burntwood. Such a suburban Extensions that could lead to 7. We will seek to deal with the sprawl is not in anyone’s interest. future creeping encroachment issues of increased traffic flows (merging settlements) will not be (and speed) throughout the 2. We will protect the relationship supported. Parish and seek to maintain between Upper Longdon and and improve highways, bridle Cannock Chase and Gentleshaw 5. We will support the provision paths and footways for all with Cannock Chase/Gentleshaw of new housing, primarily for users. We will campaign for Common by resisting local people, that provides improvements to the network of public footpaths and community transport links.

8. To deliver community benefits, appropriate new development within the Plan area should be required to contribute to a Parish wide package of measures intended to improve recreational facilities, environmental quality and community safety, including speed reduction measures.

The planning policy context

This Section sets out the Neighbourhood Planning process and the key documents with which the Neighbourhood Plan needs to accord.

National Planning Policy Framework Lichfield (2012) District Local Plan Our Strategy (2008-2029)

The National Planning Policy The Lichfield District Local Plan was test of compliance – the principal Framework, 2012 (NPPF) and the adopted by full Council on 17th requirement for meeting the Basic web based Planning Practice February 2015, providing the broad Conditions of the Neighbourhood Guidance (PPG) outline the UK policy framework and long term Planning Regulations. Government’s policies for land use, land use strategy that will guide at the heart of which is a and manage development over In addition to the higher order ‘presumption in favour of the District as a whole for the next plans, Lichfield District Council sustainable development’. The 15 years. This Development Plan has produced a series of generic guidance advocates positive Document adds a layer of detail Supplementary Planning growth, with economic, social to the generic NPPF guidance, Documents. Of specific relevance and environmental benefits being setting out the overall approach to Longdon Parish are: delivered through the planning to be followed for the provision of system. new dwellings, community facilities, • The Rural development SPD, employment opportunities and 2015. Neighbourhood Planning is an transport and communication integral part of the NPPF, enabling infrastructure across the District. • The Historic Environment SPD local communities to engage in the In so doing, it has helped inform 2015. process of shaping development the production of this draft within their area and identify any Neighbourhood Plan. local needs and desires the land use planning system may be able As part of the required Public to address. Inquiry process, the Lichfield District Council’s Local Plan has A requirement of the NPPF is that been externally examined to ensure Neighbourhood Plans must also its policies are ‘sound’ and in be in general conformity with other compliance with relevant legislation strategic land use policies of the and the NPPF. Provided this draft Local Authority including, where Neighbourhood Plan is consistent necessary, the provision of new with these higher order plans and housing. policies, it will, in turn, pass the

Draft Longdon Parish Neighbourhood Plan

Neighbourhood Plans provide Immediately following the area’s The formal Regulation 14 the third strand to the local policy designation, wide ranging consultation took place between framework for Lichfield District; community consultation July 11th and August 21st 2016. this Neighbourhood Plan will add commenced, determining the local The draft Plan was again revised a more detailed level of land use issues, the community wants following the consultation exercise. planning guidance for Longon - the do’s and the don’ts. Through Parish. Taken together, these three various means (posters on notice No other Neighbourhood tiers of planning policy will form boards, household flyers, public Development Plan is in preparation part of the suite of documents meetings, briefings with the in Longdon Parish. that will help in the determination numerous Parish organisations, of any planning applications for a dedicated part of the Council’s development in the Parish. website, the Parish magazine, face-to-face contacts, and regular The relevant sections and polices progress reports at Parish Council in both the NPPF and the Local meetings) opportunities were Plan, will be referenced in the opened up for parishioners to appropriate sections of this draft get involved and express their Neighbourhood Plan. thoughts. In 2012, Longdon Parish Council Local engagement has been resolved to apply to Lichfield continuous since then, resulting in District Council to prepare a an initial draft Neighbourhood Plan Neighbourhood Plan to cover being consulted upon for a period the whole of the Parish area. The of 6 weeks in October/November District Council approved the 2015. application and designation in July 2013, enabling work on the draft That initial draft Plan was amended Plan to begin. to reflect comments made during the informal consultation. A Parish Council-led The ongoing process has been Neighbourhood Planning Working explained to residents, land owners Group was formed of Councillors and interested parties. and local people, from a variety of backgrounds across the Parish.

The Policies

None of the policies contained within this document are to be read in isolation. They should be viewed as an integral suite, reflecting the views and wishes of the local communities living and working in Longdon Parish. In that way, change can be accommodated and managed, whilst still retaining the aspirational nature of the area.

Landscape and the Built Justification and Evidence The Parish adjoins Cannock Chase, Environment The layout, design and appearance an Area of Outstanding Natural of individual (or collections of) Beauty (AONB) and a Special Area How the buildings fi t into the buildings, adds interest and colour of Conservation (SAC). Gentleshaw landscape, the views and vistas, are to the rural backdrop of the Parish. Common (a Site of Special all essential components of what Scientific Interest (SSSI) for lowland makes the Parish so special – an New development can prompt heathland) is also within the Plan ‘aspirational’ place in which to live. much local debate and is examined area. There are a number of

in detail during the planning individual Tree Preservation Orders By highlighting the positive application process. However, in (TPOs) within the Parish, with a aspects of the local countryside, the past, focusing too heavily on large number clustered around considering development in the appearance and relationship the main settlements. A number the round, and emphasising the of a new development to its of non-statutory Sites of Biological importance of its impact on the immediate neighbours, has led to Importance (SBI) exist across the landscape, it should be possible some regrettable situations, where area. to avoid poor building decisions the impact on the wider landscape of the past creeping into the setting has not been sufficiently The traditional field systems within landscape of the future considered - the spaces between the Parish were generally subject buildings are as important as the to boundary alterations during the The views of local people buildings themselves. second half of the 20th Century, in were; response to an increased demand The rural setting and natural for agricultural productivity. The environment are amongst the Landscape recent ‘horsification’ of the area most valued elements of this Apart from the four village (with paddocks becoming more area. Open space, woodland, settlements, a few farmsteads prevalent), has begun to impact trees and hedgerows should be (much reduced following the Foot upon the more established farming maintained, with existing wildlife and Mouth outbreak in 2001) and patterns, to meet the needs of habitats preserved and protected individual isolated properties the equine industry, or the leisure for future generations; school dotted throughout, Longdon pursuits of local horse riders. children, farmers, businesses, land Parish is primarily an agricultural owners and residents should be landscape. encouraged to support wildlife.

Access into and through the countryside should be improved, by the creation of new public footpaths, bridle paths etc.

Any new development should be small scale, not intrude unduly into the countryside, and should not result in over development; adding to, rather than detracting from, the rural character of the area.

The network of public footpaths that cross the Parish, enable users to appreciate the landscape features and wildlife. However, these are limited in certain areas, in particular from Bardy Lane/Dark Lane/Lower Way (Upper Longdon) through the Beaudesert and Chestall estates and into Cannock Chase.

There are no main rivers within Parish. However, a number of smaller brooks flow through it and into the River Trent. Stream habitat corridors should be maintained and where possible improved, with the aim of restoring natural features alongside and within the watercourses, whilst at the same time removing invasive species where possible.

Built Environment The four principal settlements in the Parish all differ in size, each with its own character and architectural styles.

Longdon Green is a historic Conservation Area; a few listed buildings are dotted throughout the Parish; their locations can be found at www.historicengland.org. uk.

In order to develop meaningful polices for the future that respect the areas character, design and appearance, one must firstly consider the past.

Longdon Any new development must have Longdon Green Originally a small linear settlement regard to the visual and functional Longdon Green did not suffer straddling the main road between well-being of the village, rather from the malaise of late 20th Stone and Lichfield, the village than being merely a pretty building. Century development and remains expanded considerably from the very much a traditional area late 1960s onwards (following the Any new development within the consisting of a mix of conservative, construction of the A51 by-pass), village, or as part of any future local vernacular house types, with with properties of varying size and expansion, must be based on a significant percentage of large, layout. Much of this was typical of a good understanding of local detached dwellings, most of the “speculative” design for the character and circumstances. As which benefit from ample outdoor era, and can be seen in virtually expressed above, the space amenity space. The smaller any village/suburb, anywhere in between buildings is as important detached and semi- detached the country. The expansion was as the buildings themselves. This houses (some of which are former developer influenced, formulaic, will ensure that design will be municipal housing) are of a more with very little embellishment to informed by the wider context of traditional nature, and where enhance the design, and rarely the site. Any infilling should also extended, have been done so acknowledged the local village respect the immediate spatial thoughtfully. vernacular. dimension of the part of the village where development is proposed. It is difficult to imagine Longdon A few gems from the past do Green being developed on a remain. These buildings pre-date “speculative” basis, as the current the 1960- 80’s development era Upper Longdon vogue for ‘anywhere architecture’ and sit on either side of the former Upper Longdon was also the would be disastrously at odds with A51 (now Brook End). By and large, subject of expansion in the the character and appearance of these tend to be characterful recent past, with mainly linear the existing settlement and would properties, such as those between development along the northern ruin its character. the ‘Swan with Two Necks’ public boundary of Upper Way. There house and the eastern side of were other locations on the Brook End, between Mill Way and southern side, developed at about Church Way, and a few cottages the same time (or slightly on the opposite side, between the later) and again, it would seem that southern boundary of the school these were developer influenced - playing fields and the shop/Post the way of things in those days. Office. Other development in the last With the benefit of hindsight, it couple of decades of the twentieth would have been desirable for century, such as infill building on the new developments to have Lower Way was again speculative, been influenced by the form and but small-scale and landowner led. proportions of the existing dwellings; the modest details of the As with Longdon village, any new older buildings would have sufficed development, must be based on to present simple, but effective a good understanding of local designs. Recent developments character and circumstances; the (Hawcroft) have “nodded” in the space between buildings being direction of more traditional styling, as important as the buildings but the cul-de-sac layout and themselves. This will ensure that inclusion of overbearing detailing, design will be informed by the detracts from their aesthetics. wider context of the site, and Any new development, or future influenced by the villages sustainable expansion of the linear pattern and older/original village, must deserve a more properties, for instance those along respectful class of design, to Lower Way. Any infilling should prevent a recurrence of the “mock” again respect the immediate spatial styles which developers claim to dimension of the part of the village appeal to prospective purchasers: where development is proposed. they may well do, but should be resisted. Principal settlements in the Parish © Crown Copyright. Database Rights 2015, Lichfield District Council. Licence No : 100017765 not to scale

The village does not have a defined Most of the properties (including It is recognised, however, that in boundary and as such is ‘washed- the church and school) are well some cases, making a statement of over’ by Green Beltpolicies. scattered around the various lanes, an extension can be effective (for However, if development accords reflecting the nature of historic example by the inclusion of with those policies and is development. Although many have an entirely different design ethos). acceptable, it should be of modest been extended over time, they That said, this type of work is few density and must take its influence reflect the rural vernacular of the and far between and must be from the existing properties, thus area. considered on a case by case basis, maintaining the character of the and extremely carefully. village. The prevailing Green Belt policies will limit any development in Gentleshaw. However, if the Car parking and access stringent criteria for building in the Gentleshaw Where possible, all new Green Belt can be met, minor infill Due to its location and topography, development must accommodate must reflect the nature of the area’s Gentleshaw has not been subject adequate car parking within the properties which, on the whole, to over-development. curtilage of a property, so as not to tend to be of a modest size. lead to a significant increase in kerb Gentleshaw Common is a side parking. However, the level protected site, providing an Farmsteads, isolated, of car parking must be balanced attractive visual amenity and open against the aesthetic impact on the space for residents to enjoy. As and individual properties appearance of the property itself. with Longdon Green, Gentleshaw Although there is a general does not have a defined settlement presumption against development boundary, and is therefore ‘washed in the Green Belt, any proposals over’ by Green Belt policies. that can satisfy the exemptions (as set out in paras 87 - 89 of the NPPF), must demonstrate that due regard has been paid to their impact on longer range views and vistas, as well as the immediate context; unsympathetic development in the past has had an adverse visual impact on the openness of the landscape.

In order to preserve the rural nocturnal landscape, external lighting, other than intermittent PIR’s to illuminate isolated buildings (including stables, loose boxes etc.) should not be permitted.

Extensions With regard to extensions to existing properties, it should be emphasised that in general, the extension should be designed so as to be subservient to the existing property. There is little point in allowing a property to be extended in such a way that the new works overwhelm, or detract from, the visual appearance of the existing building. Where buildings have been rendered to mask /blend-in extensions, the original building should remain dominant.

The Principles and Objectives that underpin the Landscape and Built Environment Numbers 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8. Planning Policy Context NPPF – Paragraphs 17, 55-58, 75, 79 , 81, 87- 89 and 125. Lichfield District Local Plan Strategy (2015). Chapters 2,3,5,11 and 12.

Landscape and Built Environment Policies

Policy 1 To protect and enhance the natural landscape and designated wildlife sites, projects and developments which increase wildlife habitats and species, in accordance with the Staffordshire and Lichfi eld District’s Biodiversity Action Plans, will be supported in principle. Where possible, the removal of hedgerows will be resisted.

Policy 2 In principle, tThe creation of new public footpaths/bridleways, to improve access to the countryside, will be encouraged where this does not cause confl ict with Policy 1.

Policy 3 There will be a presumption against built development outside of the village boundaries (rural exceptions notwithstanding) except for purposes set out in the relevant section of the NPPF and Core Policy 6 of the Local Plan. Proposals for new rural workers dwellings will need to be accompanied by a robust demonstration that the principal criteria of need, distance etc., have been fully explored and can be justifi ed set out in the Lichfield District Council Rural Development Supplementary Planning Document.

Policy 4 Applications for new development will be encouraged to be accompanied by design statements that clearly required to demonstrate how the design has regard to the traditional village vernacular (including the use of materials) and the impact such development could have on existing landscapes, and vistas. Acknowledging that whilst all development will be considered on its own merits, development will be resisted where inappropriate, artifi cial/contrived measures in general, such as ground re-modelling are proposed, to help protect the character and appearance of the rural landscapeAny new buildings outside the village settlement boundaries must be appropriately landscaped to sensitively integrate the development into the surrounding countryside. 19

Housing Justification and Evidence Plan Allocations), land owners are People ‘aspire’ to live in Longdon Development in the Parish prior to able argue successfully in favour of Parish because of its character, the 1960’s evolved in response to village boundary alterations, beauty and neighbourliness the needs of the largely agrarian enabling their fields to be - qualities that villagers hold economy. Gentleshaw and developed, the scale of such high…..and are passionate about Longdon Green typify the building must be carefully protecting. This does not mean dispersed pattern of development, considered so as not to conflict however, that this Plan is anti- whereas Longdon Village and with either LDC’s ‘Vision for Local development; change is a given. Upper Longdon experienced Areas,’ or this document’s Vision significant growth in the latter part and Objectives - the core of this There is a range of accommodation of last century, of a more suburban Neighbourhood Plan. within the Parish, from single fashion, featuring bungalows and Any adjustment to village bedroom flats and alms houses culs-de-sac. boundaries to encompass rural through to more substantial multi exception sites, or in consideration roomed country homes. However, Conversion of existing non- of windfall sites in the Green Belt, the price of properties in the area residential properties (i.e. barn will be considered as part of the far exceeds the means of those on conversions and on brownfield Local Plan Allocations process. average earnings, disadvantaging sites), is likely to feature in the future, although it is acknowledged families with young children. The In keeping with the Principles that the scope for this type of availability of affordable rented and Objectives of the Vision, the development is limited. properties is scarce, further Working Group preparing this compounding the issue. And document considered such Lichfield District’s Strategic Housing the age profi le of the Parish also scenarios and strived to enshrine Land Availability Assessment 2015 suggests that under occupancy of the overriding principles of good (SHLAA) indicates that future private properties is disadvantaging design into the policies, whilst at housing growth targets for the starter families, that wish to remain, the same time being pragmatic to District are likely to be met by or move into the area. the potential for change: development within the key urban If Longdon Parish wants to and rural settlements. None of • ‘Infill’ development could continue to thrive it is important the ‘smaller villages’ (such as those contribute to, and not detract to bear in mind that change in the Parish) currently have any from, the historic character of the does not, necessarily, equate to identified allocations in the District villages. harm. Managed change, is both Local Plan Strategy (2015). The the aspiration of the plan and its ‘Vision for Rural Areas’ as outlined • New residents will help objective. in the Strategy, gives emphasis to improve the sustainability of this, but enables neighbourhood the wider village settlements in The views of local people were; planning to play a role in terms of supporting the local Uncontrolled growth was a major determining local growth, if shops, schools, churches and theme expressed during the considered appropriate community facilities. consultations. It was felt that the rural setting of the Parish was Whilst this draft plan supports • New development will also help being eroded by unsympathetic Lichfield’s District Local Plan to deliver some of the other development, and that a creeping Strategy, it is clear from the objectives contained within the encroachment into the Green Belt SHLAA that local landowners and Plan. was threatening the character developers consider that of the villages. There was an the villages do have some Striking a balance between known acknowledgement however, that development potential. development ambitions, with the the sustainability of village life desire to manage any change in an was also under threat, due to The SHLAA indicated that acceptable and sustainable manner, the ageing demographic profile, despite the above, a number of is the key objective of the following under-occupation of properties, sites outside the current village housing policies. and the shortage of smaller house boundaries have been put forward It should be noted that village types for residents at both ends of for development by landowners/ boundaries only exist for Longdon the age spectrum. Some growth agents. and Upper Longdon. Green Belt was therefore seen as acceptable, policies therefore continue to apply providing homes for local people, If in the future (as part of the to Longdon Green and Gentleshaw but in suitable locations; infilling, District Council’s ongoing ‘Call and across the remainder of the not estates. for Sites’ to help inform the Local plan area.

The Principles and Objectives that underpin Housing Number 5 and 6

Policy Context NPPF - Paragraphs 50,55,58,60 and 87-89. Lichfield District Plan Strategy (2015): Strategic Priorities 2,5 and 12. Core Policies 1 and 6. Development Management Policy: H2: Provision of Affordable Homes. BE1: High Quality Development Policy Rural 1: Rural Areas. Rural Development SPD (2015).

Housing Policies

Policy 5 To assist the sustainability of the villages, limited small scaleinfill residential development within village boundariesthe settlement boundaries of Longdon (as shown on Map 20 of the Lichfield Local Plan Strategy 2008-2029) and Upper Longdon (as shown on Map 25 of the Lichfield Local Plan Strategy 2008-2029) will be supported in principle. For example, minor linear infilling (including courtyard development), as opposed to new ‘estates’; culs-de-sac are not appropriate.

Any infilling should have regard to the immediate spatial dimension of the part of the village where development is proposed. To reinforce local distinctiveness, the size, scale and density of any new development (in terms of their individual or collective appearance) must respect the traditional local rural vernacular and be fully integrated into the villages.

Policy 6 New housing primarily suitable for local people, especially for starter families and the elderly, will be supported within appropriate village locations, so that the distance to travel for public transport, recreational activity, shopping etc., is reasonablethe settlement boundaries of Longdon and Upper Longdon.

Policy 7 Conversion of non-residential properties to residential use, and windfall residential development on previously developed ‘brownfield land’ will be considered on their meritssupported, provided the general design principles of local character, massing, appearance etc., are respected and that such development does not lead to creeping encroachment into the Green Belt, leading to a merging of settlementsadversely impact on the openness of the Green Belt.

Policy 8 LDC’s affordable housing policies will apply to all new development within the Plan area. Any affordable properties that are provided below market value (for sale or rent), will be secured in perpetuity through s106 agreement or legal covenant, to ensure that they remain affordable. The occupation of such properties will be targeted at people living locally in the fi rst instance, or at those with relatives living within the Parish, before being placed on the open market. In disposing of such affordable properties for sale or rent, the vendor/ landlord will have to demonstrate that all reasonable efforts to comply with the policy have been undertaken.

Movement concern, as is ‘rat-running’ traffic No bus service connects the The volume and speed of using Borough Lane between Longdon and Gentleshaw traffic makes the A51 primary Burntwood and Longdon, Hood settlements. Gentleshaw isn’t road a hostile environment for Lane from Armitage, and Upper served by a bus service, although pedestrians, cyclists and public Way / Stockings Lane from buses from Cannock Wood travel transport users. There is also a Cannock and Hednesford. A review to Cannock and Lichfield hourly, 7 difficulty for traffic to safely access of the speed limits throughout the days a week (no. 62 and 62A). the main road from side roads, plan area would be welcomed, as especially during peak periods. a means to identifying problem The poor level of public transport areas and thereby addressing them. provision, coupled with a lack of The nature of the area means that Speed of traffic within the villages dedicated walking and cycling the four principal settlements are themselves is also a concern; this facilities, means that the local not well connected to each other, is unwittingly aided at certain population who do not have access other than by private transport locations by pavement parking. to a car, have difficulties accessing along country lanes. Access to and This practice (for understandable education, health, leisure, social from the surrounding larger urban reasons), effectively widens the and employment opportunities. /employment areas, like Lichfield carriageway, improves visibility and This concern was specifically and Rugeley (and further afield), thereby assists irresponsible highlighted in a survey undertaken again is mainly by private transport; driving habits (speeding), as well as by Lichfield District Council in 2008. 77% of commuters use private cars creating difficulties for pedestrians, (2011 Census). wheel chair and buggy users. Country lanes without footpaths are understandably commonplace Addressing many of the Although traffic moving along throughout the Plan area, but the issues identified with the road the A51 between Lichfield and parlous state of the footpath (and infrastructure are a matter for Staffs Rugeley over the last few years has overgrown hedges) alongside the County Council as the highways remained fairly constant, at around A51 between Lichfield and Brereton authority. However, this section 15,000 vehicles per day, the volume is inexplicable, deterring longer highlights the main local concerns of light and heavy goods vehicles distance walking. and proposes measures that can has increased as a result of the help alleviate them. growth of warehousing / logistics Pedestrian movement within the facilities at Fradley and Rugeley. villages is generally adequate, Increased incidences of HGV’s although the lack of pavements The views of local people were; using the lanes, prompted by an on High Street, Borough Lane and The amount and speed of increased reliance on sat-nav’s, has Hood Lane (Longdon), Upper Way traffic travelling to and between led to signage being erected at (Upper Longdon) and Commonside the villages in the Parish, is a certain locations to dissuade such (Gentleshaw) and Church Hill, growing concern. The highway traffic. An increase in the number Longdon Green, makes for less infrastructure is being put under of large horse boxes and trailers than safe walking. increasing pressure in part due to being driven through the lanes (as increased traffic using the country a result of the diversification away Cycling is increasingly popular, lanes, the reduced levels of road from agriculture), has also been both for journeys to work and as a maintenance, and the increased noted - in some instances leading leisure activity, especially given the reliance on sat-navs. Heavy goods to conflicts with other road users. close proximity of Cannock Chase. vehicles using roads not suitable However, there are no dedicated for such are damaging the road Although the Longdons lie cycle lanes along the A51, and the surfaces, as well as leading to alongside the A51, through bus speed of traffic along the lanes conflict with other road users services between Lichfield and poses its own dangers for cyclists. Stafford (via Rugeley) prefer to Pedestrian movement is inhibited travel an alternative route through There is a concern over the by the lack of pavements, and Armitage and Handsacre. There are general maintenance of highways speeding traffic is a danger for currently no stopping commercial (carriageway edges and pot walkers, cyclists and horse riders bus services between Lichfield and holes in particular), footways and alike, using the lanes for exercise, Stafford via the Longdons. Since hedgerows. Some locations are in leisure and business (race horse 2016 however, Longdon residents poor condition and vegetation is ‘road work’). have benefitted from a Ring and overgrowing verges, pavements Ride initiative promoted by the and highway signage. Visibility for Justification and Evidence County Council. drivers exiting High Street onto the The speed of through traffic using A51 for example, is much reduced the lanes in general is a specific during the summer months.

Signage on the A51 appears The Principles and Objectives excessive at certain locations; that underpin Movement measures to reduce the ‘clutter’ Numbers 7and 8. should be explored to improve appearance, as well as road safety. Policy Context NPPF Paragraph 29 and 32. Within the plan area there are three Lichfield District Local Plan Strategy lay-byes along the A51. ‘Over- (2015): nighting’ by HGV’s (prior to Traffic Strategic Priorities 2 and 5. Regulation Orders (TRO’s) limiting Core Policies 5. waiting times being introduced Development Management in 2015), led to concerns for the Policies: well-being of the drivers, but also ST1: Sustainable Travel. the accumulations of rubbish etc, associated with the activity. Extended ‘over-nighting’ by Working with the Highways continental hauliers, meant that Authority and landowners, this Plan space was unavailable to others will in principle, support proposals wishing to take a short break from within the plan area that improve driving. The TRO’s have inevitably safety, create footways where led to displacement of the problem lacking, enhance public to other areas in the District; the TRO’s will need to be monitored footpaths/bridleways and cycle and enforced where appropriate, if routes across the area, including the problem isn’t to reoccur. better facilities along and across the A51 for pedestrians and cyclists; Working with bus operators, this Plan will support improvements to public transport provision, providing bus services into the principal settlements, with supporting infrastructure.

Movement Policies

Policy 9 Improving Access: Working with the Highways Authority and landowners, this Plan will in principle, support proposals within the plan area that improve safety, create footways where lacking, enhance public footpaths/bridleways and cycle routes across the area, including better facilities along and across the A51 for pedestrians and cyclists; Working with bus operators, this Plan will support improvements to public transport provision, providing bus services into the principal settlements, with supporting infrastructure. Commented [JP1]: Examiner recommends this be retained as a ‘community action’ – would suggest this is done and included in a similar box either after this policy Policy 10 Improving safety section or in a final chapter of the plan. This Plan will actively encourage and support; a review of speed limits on roads throughout the Plan area; 20mph variable speed limits outside schools; and traffic calming measures at appropriate locations.

Measures to create safer vehicle access arrangements at junctions with the A51 will be supported.

A review of the proliferation of traffic regulation signs along the A51 will be undertaken, with a view to minimising their number and thereby leading to improved effectiveness and road safety.

Working with the County Council, the Parish Council will consider the highway maintenance works programme (including hedgerow pruning, gully emptying and winter gritting), and where appropriate, support enhancements that benefit the communities living within the Plan area.

Policy 11 Supporting development Any new development (inc change of use or conversion) within the Plan area must demonstrate that there would be no material significant adverse impact on the safe and efficient operation of the local road network, including residential roads, rural lanes and parking.

Community Facilities and Green and Upper Longdon have Outdoor recreation Leisure no community facilities, other than Longdon Parish is blessed in its a pub in each and the Cricket Club location. It is part of a designated Today’s society faces major in Longdon Green. Area of Outstanding Natural challenges, such as creating healthy Beauty which provides a wealth of lifestyles, combating mental health There is a case for additional opportunities for walking, horse problems and alleviating isolation facilities, if the challenge of riding and generally enjoying a of the elderly, particularly in rural creating a sense of well-being beautiful landscape. Additionally, communities. in the residents, whatever their parishioners can easily engage in

age, is to be met. None of the more active pursuits, like cycling In seeking to make Longdon current halls are big enough to and orienteering on Cannock Parish a sustainable community, allow more physical activities, such Chase. Longdon Cricket Club maximising community benefit as badminton, indoor football, enjoys excellent local support from land use is a key priority - it ballroom dancing etc. Consultation and currently has the use of a is this concept of well-being which revealed that there would be a real picturesque ground in Longdon drives the community dimension of demand for such activities if the Green. the Plan. Parish could house them. On the other hand, there are Parishioners are keen to engage certain outdoor amenities which The views of local people were; in local learning opportunities, one would expect to find, which are The Parish is a good place to live. such as classes in information present in neighbouring Parishes However, there is also room for technology. Additionally, they see (such as Colton, Streethay and improvement. opportunities to develop a range Cannock Wood), but absent in of social organisations like chess, Longdon. There is nowhere in There is a general consensus bridge and youth clubs etc. the Parish which offers parents a that for Longdon Parish to be purpose-built, safe children’s genuinely sustainable, it needs this While the current halls would playground for families to enjoy. Neighbourhood Plan to reflect the meet the requirements of the less Apart from the cricket ground, community priorities. physical activities, a new multi- there is no publicly accessible purpose building would playing field for running, team provide a Community Hub for the sports and community events. Justification and Evidence Parish which could address key There is also a long standing desire On the face of it, for a Parish with challenges. The older population to create a bowling green as a the bulk of its population living in could enjoy social / intellectual / focus for sport and social activity four main settlements, Longdon is physical stimulation to help offset for all ages. well served by community facilities. the risks of physical and mental There are two state Primary health problems in old age, whilst schools, two private schools, the younger or more agile, could two churches, five pubs and four enjoy a greater choice of indoor community halls, although the one sporting activities, contributing to in Gentleshaw is technically part of their health and fitness. Cannock Wood Parish (100m from the plan boundary). However, closer inspection reveals gaps in the range of facilities; this Plan seeks to address those gaps

Indoor recreation Longdon village is quite well served with indoor recreation facilities. There is a thriving Village Hall, (which houses a successful pre-school as one of its many contributions to life in the village), a Womens’ Institute Hall and the Longdon Memorial Hall. Additionally there is a community hall in Gentleshaw, although it is located just inside the Cannock Wood Parish boundary. Longdon

The Principles and Objectives that underpin Community Facilities and Leisure Numbers 3 and 8.

Policy Context NPPF – Paragraphs 69, 70, 73 and 74 Lichfi eld District Local Plan Strategy (2015). Strategic Priority 11. Core policies 4, 10 and 11. Development Management Policies: IP1: Supporting and Providing Our Infrastructure. HSC1: Open Space Standards. HSC2: Playing Fields and Sports Facility Standards. Rural Development SPD (2015).

Community Facilities and Leisure Policies

Policy 12 There will be a presumption against the loss of any of the following existing community and recreational facilities (meeting halls, sports field etc), unless it can be demonstrated that there will be a net gain in both the quantity and the quality of any new provision:  The Red Lion PH, Longdon Green Formatted: Font color: Auto  The Swan with Two Necks PH, Brook End, Longdon Formatted: Bulleted + Level: 1 + Aligned at: 0.92 cm +  .The Windmill PH, Gentleshaw Indent at: 1.56 cm  The Redmore PH, Gentleshaw  The Longdon Post Office and Store, Brook End, Longdon Formatted: Font color: Auto  St James Academy, Brook End, Longdon Formatted: Font color: Auto  Gentleshaw School, Gentleshaw  Longdon Village Hall, Brook End, Longdon Formatted: Font color: Auto  The Memorial Hall, Brook End, Longdon Formatted: Font color: Auto  The WI Hall, Ford Lane, Longdon Formatted: Font color: Auto  Longdon Cricket Club, Red Lion Ground, Longdon Green Formatted: Font color: Auto Policy 13 Formatted: Font color: Auto Opportunities to create a purpose built, multi-functional community ‘Hub’ in Longdon Village will be supported Formatted: Font color: Auto in principle. Formatted: Font color: Auto Policy 14 To enable parents and children to play together outside in a safe environment, improving fitness and building confidence, support in principle will be forthcoming for the development (and maintenance) of a dedicated children’s playground within the main village settlements.

Policy 15 To promote outdoor community activity and general fitness;

(a) Support in principle will be forthcoming for the creation (and maintenance) of a multi - purpose outdoor recreation ground (with appropriate equipment), capable of accommodating team games, creating opportunities for healthy competition, including any necessary small scale built facilities to support such use.

(b) Should suitable locations be identified, all appropriate development generating a s106 / CIL contribution within the Plan area will be expected to contribute towards delivering the facility(s).

The Rural Economy and Outside of the main settlements, It is unclear exactly which goods Infrastructure land use is dominated by and services the ‘Longdon pound’ agriculture and equestrian activity. is spent on. It is clear however, It is essential that the Parish The current profile has not changed that the demand profile has been strives to sustain the vitality of significantly during the last 20 changing, as the demographic the community, with modern years. However, since the last has significantly shifted to include infrastructure to support existing major outbreak of Foot and Mouth a large percentage of over 55’s – and new businesses playing a major disease in 2001, many farmers have generally understood to be the part in this. The Neighbourhood left the industry – outbreaks of most wealthy and with a range of Plan is intended to: Bovine Tuberculosis compounding demands. The Parish demographic

the issue. Farming patterns have also has an elderly, and frail-elderly • support existing businesses also changed, moving from segment (9 percentage points wanting to expand current dairy into arable and / or animal higher than Lichfield District, and activities through the limited husbandry (primarily beef cattle 12% higher than the West Midlands conversion of existing buildings, and sheep), with contractor working – Census 2011), again with available and small scale expansion becoming more prevalent. As is means and particular demands.

common across Lichfield District, Therefore, there are opportunities • encourage the improvement in there are now relatively few people for limited and targeted service the fundamental infrastructure/ employed in agriculture. offerings to be developed, which services required for business address the Parish ‘needs and activities The reduction in farming activity demands’, and could help retain

resulted in farms changing hands, the ‘Longdon pound.’ • attract rural tourism to benefit with the associated land and local businesses, residents and buildings changing use, with some Recently, because of changes to visitors fragmentation. This led to a range licensing laws, shopping patterns

of new homes being created from and increased leisure opportunities, • support rural diversification the conversion of farm buildings, any local pub, club, business, through the addition of domestic owners buying parcels etc., has faced a significant appropriate businesses and of land for equine use, and small challenge to maintain itself as services, whilst resisting holdings being established, a viable commercial enterprise, inappropriate land use for including some for the rearing of rather than existing almost as a business herds / flocks of rare-breeds. social convenience. Additionally,

competition is increasing in the • encourage businesses to target With the conversion and sub nearby towns as they develop their the requirements of the Parish division of farms, the number offering. This, coupled with the demographic of households in the Parish has march of internet shopping (with increased. These are predominantly various delivery options), means The views of local people were; for commuters to the local major that the service sector environment There are a considerable number towns and cities. This has meant within the Parish is exacting; there of self employed in the Parish, but that the majority of the working has been no evidence of new shops few local job opportunities since age households are mobile and or meaningful services establishing most are sole traders working connected, and do not depend on themselves in the area in recent from home. Farming employs the Parish for employment or the years. very few these days, because of provision of trades and services. mechanisation and the reduced The Parish does however attract number of farms. Broadband speed The Parish is not, and is unlikely ‘other pounds’, through visitors. is inconsistent; fibre optic cabling to have ever been, self-sufficient, Longdon is already a destination should be provided to all existing relying on neighbouring towns in its own right, for walkers using and new properties, to support for purchasing the majority of its footpaths, lanes, fields and forest; local enterprise and entrepreneurs. goods and services. It is affluent, cyclists using roads, lanes and off- but with the majority of its ‘earned’ road; people going to ‘destination’ wealth originating from outside pubs / eateries; visitors to ancient the Parish, and in turn mostly spent Churches; out-of-Parish school Justification and Evidence ‘out of Parish,’ there is limited local pupils and families; visitors enjoying Rural Economy presence or benefit. The inward the atmosphere of the villages and Today the Parish retains its investment or local multiplier is greens; attendees of Parish events historical, traditional, rural, therefore low. The Parish currently and shows. country character, whilst many does not have business/office, of its neighbouring communities e-units, small factories, distribution Therefore, the Parish has its own are developing with associated units, public sector service offices, basic, intrinsic attractiveness, and urbanisation. medical facilities etc. local demand, as well as significant

surrounding demand. This helps Alternative means of power infrastructure, and, where maintain the few businesses and generation are not commonly seen necessary, planning obligations will jobs which exist, but could support in the Parish. However, this plan will be used to address the impacts of further enterprises. not mitigate against appropriate development proposals. applications. Where appropriate in scale, and so as not to compromise the Where possible, the The Principles and Objectives character of the villages or their Neighbourhood Plan will in that underpin Rural Economy surroundings, the development of principle ensure that developments and Infrastructure existing and further services offered offer substantial opportunities to Numbers 2 and 5 within Longdon Parish will be enhance existing infrastructure, encouraged. such as: distributing mains gas Policy Context to parts of the village that are NPPF – Paragraph 28 currently off-grid; improvements Lichfi eld District Local Plan Infrastructure to water pressure; provision of Strategy Telecommunications. mains sewage; provision of fibre (2015): The industry of telecommunications broadband; opportunities for siting Strategic Priorities 7 and 8. has seen significant change in mobile masts. Core Policy 7. recent years. The digital revolution Rural Development SPD (2015). with the introduction of the web/ Electricity generation from internet, combined with an various alternative sources will be explosion of new devices, plus encouraged and sympathetically convergent technology, is causing considered. However, it is a social and industrial revolution. recognised that there could This is an economic and social step be visual impacts and land use change. considerations.

As a result, the Parish’s demand It is noted that Staffordshire for immediate, ‘fast’, contiguous County Council (SCC) is already access to both the internet/web, delivering a Superfast Broadband and communication networks, programme, which includes much through all devices is now ‘a given’. of the Parish. The benefits of this Users see these as basic utilities. are already being seen, as ‘fibre’ is Homes need to have either ‘fibre- installed to the cabinets. However, to-the-property’ or some equally this does not cover all households. fast delivery method. Contiguous Therefore pressure will be mobile phone signals need to be maintained on the SCC programme available throughout the Parish. to ensure full and enhanced coverage to as many households as Mains Services. possible is achieved. Access to the main systems for both gas, and sewerage is still not Where possible, receipts received fully available across the Parish, and from New Homes Bonus and water pressures are not particularly Community Infrastructure Levy will high. be used to deliver new community

Rural Economy and Infrastructure Policies

Policy 16 Development that creates local employment opportunities will be supported in principle where they add to the diversification of the rural economy, provided that their impact does not compromise other policies and objectives contained within this Plancontained in the development plan. Policy 17 Delivery of a comprehensive Superfast Broadband network across the Parish (not only within the principal settlements) will be supported in principle.

Delivery

For the guidance contained within this Neighbourhood Plan to achieve the objectives and aspirations set out in the Vision, a robust approach to managing development is essential. The underlying philosophy and policies contained within this document will be applied to manage growth over the Plan period, to ensure that inappropriate development is prevented from having a detrimental impact on the nature and appearance of the villages, the important vistas, and the rural character of the Parish.

Sustainable, organic growth will In order for this to happen • Where lacking, the creation be allowed in principle, whilst at (and mindful of the enhanced and maintenance of safe public the same time protecting the very Community Infrastructure Levy pavements at appropriate nature of the Parish, which is so contributions that may accrue to locations. important to its residents. the Parish Council, and New Homes Bonus to the District Council as a • Traffic management measures Therefore, in addition to the above result of development), a more pro- throughout the Parish. policies; active approach to the negotiations and determination of planning • Creation and maintenance of Policy 18 applications will be required. This public footpaths and bridleways. will necessitate a commitment on All new developments generating the part of both Longdon Parish • Promotion of (and contribution Council and Lichfield District towards) a dedicated cyclepath s106 or CIL obligations will be expected to make contributions Council (as the local planning along the A51 (within the Parish), towards Parish-wide infrastructure authority), to develop a better as part of an enhanced cycle works, designed to ensure that understanding (through closer path between Rugeley and regardless of the size or type of working at pre planning application Lichfield. development, every new addition stage) of proposed developments makes a worthwhile contribution both inside and outside the plan • Assessment of the need for, area, which could impact upon it to the sustainability of the and possible consolidation of, (including impacts on the highway community halls to create a communities in which they choose to live and/or work. infrastructure). Agreeing the community Hub. nature and level of any community benefits that may result from the • Provision of, or improvements Partnership working granting of planning permissions, to, outdoor recreational facilities It is acknowledged that a land would also be helpful. at suitable locations across the use plan is only part of the Parish, including the provision of tool-kit necessary for Longdon To better facilitate this, a prioritised a Multi-Use Games Area within Parish to remain the place where schedule of projects will be Longdon Village. people aspire to live. With the prepared by the Parish Council (and Neighbourhood Plan as its Core reviewed regularly), to help ensure • An assessment of the need for Document and evidence base, that the community benefits are mobile service provision e.g. Longdon Parish Council will work delivered from the accumulated health facility. in partnership with Staffordshire funds of Parish-wide development. County Council and Lichfield District Council to deliver the local In the first instance (2017), the government measures arising out following are identified for further of this Plan. exploration and prioritisation; • A review of speed restrictions In addition to the more statutory throughout the plan area. aspects, the Parish Council will also seek to engage with other • The introduction of a public and private agencies and 20mph zone on School Lane organisations (as appropriate), (Gentleshaw) and traffic calming including the voluntary sector, measures where appropriate. to secure the improvements highlighted throughout this document.

The Parish Council working group that has prepared this Plan, would like to place on record its thanks to everyone that has made a contribution to its making, regardless of how large or small. Without extensive community involvement, this document would not have been possible.