DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 Cannock Chase Bird Survey Species Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017 Cannock Chase Bird Survey Species Report West Midland Bird Club Stafford Branch 2017 Cannock Chase Bird Survey Species Report In memory of Frank Gribble MBE WEST MIDLAND BIRD CLUB STAFFORD BRANCH 2017 Cannock Chase - Survey Sectors Cannock Chase Bird Survey 1 Satnall Hills 9B Castle Ring In memory of Frank Gribble MBE 2A Haywood Warren 9C Brereton Hayes Wood - Chetwynd Coppice 2B Haywood Park 10A Fair Oak Lodge and Pools 3A Brocton Field 10B Takeroo Rationale 3B Katyn - Sherbrook Valley 11 Strawberry Hill - Bevin’s Birches The first WMBC Cannock Chase Bird Survey was undertaken in 1992 and has been carried out at five 4 Oldacre Valley 12 White House - Pepper Slade yearly intervals since then, making the 2017 survey the 6th conducted. 5 Badger Slade 14 Gentleshaw Common The aim of the Survey is to identify those bird species present and quantify their populations in 5A Spring Slade 15 Cuckoo Bank each sector surveyed. These outcomes will then be compared with previous surveys to identify any 6 Brindley Heath 16 Shoal Hill changes and trends. 6B Brindley Heath North 17 Teddesley Park and Hayes 7 Country Park 18 Newlands Wood (Not Surveyed) Funding for this year’s survey has come from the Sustainable Development Fund administered by 8 Stile Cop - Rawnsley Hills 19 Hednesford Hills the Cannock Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (A.O.N.B) Unit and Stafford Borough Council 9A Beaudesert Old Park which was match funded by the Stafford Branch of the West Midland Bird Club. Contents Objectives The Survey results will Section One a. Target Species - Page 4-16 1. Identify changes in populations of the birds of Cannock Chase. b. WMBC 1992-2017 Target Species Summary - Page 16/17 Section Two Present only - Page 18/21 2. Inform the Cannock Chase AONB Unit; Staffordshire Wildlife Trust; Staffordshire County Council; Stafford Borough Council and other local Councils; The BTO; West Midland Bird Club; Natural Section Three Birds also seen - Page 22/24 England; The National Trust and the RSPB. Other stakeholders and local landholders, interest groups and the public will also be informed so that there is a wider understanding and knowledge Section Four Recommendations - Page 25 of the birds of Cannock Chase. Section Five References - 26 3. Be used to inform future sustainable land management to enhance ecosystems that support and Section Six Acknowledgements - Page 26/27 sustain birdlife. 4. Provide a basis for future surveys, including interim targeted species surveys. Methodology The survey area of Cannock Chase was divided into twenty-four sectors. Twenty-six competent volunteer birders were allocated a specific sector, or sectors, of the study area and asked to conduct a familiarisation visit and habitat survey of their specific sectors before the start of the survey. Photograph front cover Male Common Redstart RCB By February species such as Woodlark and Ravens have commenced breeding activities. This may also be true for certain resident birds that are on the target list, therefore, first visits were made from mid- February. During the months of March, April, May, June and July volunteers visited their sector twice each month, at two weekly intervals. At least two of those visits from mid-May were required to be Photograph this page after sun rise or at dawn to record crepuscular species. (e.g Nightjar). Specific survey arrangements Common Cuckoo MB were also made regarding Nightjar and Owls. Observations were made from pre-determined and agreed paths. Volunteers were asked to report six figure map references, evidence of breeding and habitat details of forty target species which are either scarce in Staffordshire or worthy of study as within the survey area they appear to be bucking national trends. A further twenty species of interest were noted as being present. Finally, a third list of birds which are common throughout the United Kingdom was compiled for completeness. All records were submitted to the Project Leader on spread sheets. Some additional records were also submitted by casual visitors to the Chase. 2 3 Introduction to Species Report found in 21 sectors. The maximum number seen together was 12 in March. Nesting birds were found Birds are listed in alphabetical order for ease of reference. in eight sectors in June. In 2007 their status was described as “several scattered pairs”. It appears that the population is at least stable and possibly increasing in line with the BBS results The figures after the birds’ names represent: a. the long-term percentage (%) change in the UK population from 1970-2014 (first figure) Common Crossbill a. (n.a.) b. 16% Frequent, though variable, irruptive visitor. Rare and erratic b. the Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) conducted by the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) trend breeding species. from 1995-2014 (second figure). At least four pairs bred successfully in 2017. Nest building was observed in three sectors and at In some cases the number of pairs are given where percentages (%) are not available (n.a.). four additional and different sites in February. On March 1st recently fledged birds were amongst *Where the names of the birds are preceded by an asterisk this denotes that those birds were late the groups of Crossbills roaming around the conifers. Family parties were found in the north of the additions to the Target species list. Survey area again in a further two sectors during May. Crossbills can be highly mobile, so it was hardly surprising that some records came in from another three sectors, thought not necessarily supporting Those species names that are in red are on the red list, which identifies them as species of greatest breeding birds. Crossbills may not breed every year on the Chase due to their irruptive behaviour, concern in UK and Ireland. Species whose names are in amber are of moderate concern. The but this is the first time that the WMBC Survey has been able to confirm breeding, even though it has remainder are on the Green list and are of least conservation concern. (Source, The State of Birds in been thought a probability in the past. the UK 2016. Common Cuckoo a. -54%, b. -43% Fairly common, but declining, summer visitor. Section One - Target Species Despite concerns regarding the long-term future of Cuckoos in parts of the UK the Chase remains a stronghold. There are parts of Staffordshire where residents will say that they have not heard a Barn Owl a. (n.a.) b. 227% Frequent but much declined, though now stable, resident. Cuckoo for many years. They should visit Cannock Chase! Cuckoos can be seen and heard from April Very scarce on the Chase but present in one sector in February. Another was in an adjacent sector in to mid-June. The first report was on April 9th in the Sherbrook Valley. By the month’s end calling June which suggested that there was a breeding pair, either within the Survey area or close by. A third males were distributed across 15 sectors. A further six sectors were added during May, and another sector in the west hosted a roosting pair in an oak tree but there was no proof of breeding. three in June. They could therefore be heard in every sector. A female was on the Hednesford Hills on May 8th. A hepatic female was also seen on Brindley Heath in April. By late May however, they were missing from sectors where they had been present for six or more weeks previously. Thereafter Barn Swallow a. 15%, b. 26% Very common, though declined, summer resident and passage they tended to be found in loose groups such as on Brindley Heath. This perhaps suggested that migrant. more than one male was being attracted to a recently found female. By the third week in June all Although they arrived in Staffordshire in late March they were not widely distributed around the adult Cuckoos had left. Numbers, due to high mobility, are always difficult to assess. Nevertheless, Chase until mid-April. They are attracted to human habitations with open access where nesting a maximum number would be the 45 counted in early June. By then Cuckoos were clearly grouping occurs. Some of the locations were Fair Oak Lodges, including one pair that nested in a garden shed; together. They were absent in 14 sectors. Only one juvenile Cuckoo was discovered. That was on Marquis Drive Visitor Centre and Rangers’ yard; West Cannock Farm; and various other equestrian establishments. They are however highly mobile and can be found almost anywhere on the Cuckoo Bank where the unfortunate parents were Reed Warblers. Chase especially as the breeding season advances. Seen in 18 sectors. Breeding Common Raven a. (n.a.) b. 45% Frequent visitor and uncommon to frequent, but increasing, took place in or near eight sectors at least. resident. Widely distributed across the Chase. Bred successfully in nine sectors and almost certainly in another three. The raucous cries of the juveniles *Black Redstart a 59% b -46% Scarce became a feature particularly from mid- summer resident, passage migrant and May. The largest gathering, 24 birds, was at a winter visitor. communal roost site in March. Sixteen were One was present on Cuckoo Bank on April also seen in an adjacent sector. These may 29th. have been part of the dispersing group from the original roost. Fourteen were again present *Bullfinch a. -40%, b. +9% Fairly there in May. There are few specific references common to common resident. in WMBC Annual Bird Reports for the Chase, During February Bullfinches seemed to be where they are now clearly well established surprisingly common and widespread. It as a breeding bird. Twenty years ago, Ravens was therefore belatedly decided to include in mid-Staffordshire were usually reported in them on the Target List as many in the single figures, but by 2003 they had returned Survey Team thought that their presence to this part of the County.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Registration Number: 724133
    Registration number: 00724133 Charity number: 218711 D R A F T CUMBRIA WILDLIFE TRUST LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 31 MARCH 2016 CUMBRIA WILDLIFE TRUST LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS CONTENTS PAGE Legal and administrative information 1 Chairman’s Report 2 Trustees’ Report: Objectives and activities 3 Main achievements of the year 5 Financial review 9 Future plans 11 Structure, governance and management 12 Independent Auditors’ Report to the Members 15 Consolidated Summary Statement of Financial Activities 17 Consolidated and Charity Balance Sheets 18 Consolidated and Cash Flow Statement 19 Notes to the Accounts 20 CUMBRIA WILDLIFE TRUST LIMITED LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION President Lord Inglewood Vice Presidents Mrs M E Albon Sir Martin Holdgate Miss K M Atkinson Mr S D Hill Mrs S P Bonner Dr D J Jeffray Mrs S Garnett Mrs S Johnson Dr G Halliday Mrs M Sutcliffe Board of Trustees Chairman Anne Powell Treasurer John Farmer Company Secretary John Handley Chairman of Conservation Group Martin Holdgate (until 9 October 2015) Peter Woodhead (from 9 October 2015) Chairman of Development Group Judith Wallen Individual members Jane Carson Robin Cornah Graham Hooley (from 9 October 2015) Cressida Inglewood Mike Langley (until 9 October 2015) Barbara O’Connor (until 9 October 2015) Anne Powell (Chairman and individual member) David Sharrod Director Peter Bullard Senior Managers David Harpley, Helen Duxbury, Chris Haddock Principal and Registered Office Plumgarths, Crook Road, Kendal, Cumbria LA8 8LX Auditors Crowe Clark Whitehill
    [Show full text]
  • A Literature Review of Urban Effects on Lowland Heaths and Their Wildlife
    Report Number 623 A literature review of urban effects on lowland heaths and their wildlife English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 623 A literature review of urban effects on lowland heaths and their wildlife J C Underhill-Day RSPB, Syldata Arne, Wareham Dorset BH20 5BJ Telephone: 01929 550969 email: [email protected] You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2005 Executive summary Introduction Heather clad lowland heath developed on light, freely draining, acid soils following prehistoric woodland clearance, and down the centuries, has been kept open by grazing, burning and cutting. As the economic value of these uses declined, considerable areas of heath were lost to agriculture, forestry, housing, roads, mineral working and other uses, and today, much of what is left is adjacent to built up areas, especially in Dorset. These lowland heathland fragments can be found across much of southern England on suitable soils. Much of the research on heathlands over the last twenty years has concentrated on the Dorset heaths, which are now almost all SSSIs and mostly within the Dorset Heathland SPA. While this report reflects the bias in the literature towards work in Dorset, the results have wide applicability to urban heathlands that are accessed by the surrounding urban populations for amenity and recreation whether in Dorset or elsewhere. This urban public access places considerable pressures on the heaths, for example through disturbance, wild fires, trampling, predation by domestic pets, pollution and enrichment.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Review Cover Image: Hedgehog by Keith Kirk
    Dumfries & Galloway Wildlife Review Cover Image: Hedgehog by Keith Kirk. Keith is a former Dumfries & Galloway Council ranger and now helps to run Nocturnal Wildlife Tours based in Castle Douglas. The tours use a specially prepared night tours vehicle, complete with external mounted thermal camera and internal viewing screens. Each participant also has their own state- of-the-art thermal imaging device to use for the duration of the tour. This allows participants to detect animals as small as rabbits at up to 300 metres away or get close enough to see Badgers and Roe Deer going about their nightly routine without them knowing you’re there. For further information visit www.wildlifetours.co.uk email [email protected] or telephone 07483 131791 Contributing photographers p2 Small White butterfly © Ian Findlay, p4 Colvend coast ©Mark Pollitt, p5 Bittersweet © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Wildflower grassland ©Mark Pollitt, p6 Oblong Woodsia planting © National Trust for Scotland, Oblong Woodsia © Chris Miles, p8 Birdwatching © castigatio/Shutterstock, p9 Hedgehog in grass © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Hedgehog in leaves © Mark Bridger/Shutterstock, Hedgehog dropping © northeastwildlife.co.uk, p10 Cetacean watch at Mull of Galloway © DGERC, p11 Common Carder Bee © Bob Fitzsimmons, p12 Black Grouse confrontation © Sergey Uryadnikov/Shutterstock, p13 Black Grouse male ©Sergey Uryadnikov/Shutterstock, Female Black Grouse in flight © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Common Pipistrelle bat © Steven Farhall/ Shutterstock, p14 White Ermine © Mark Pollitt,
    [Show full text]
  • Argyll Bird Report with Sstematic List for the Year
    ARGYLL BIRD REPORT with Systematic List for the year 1998 Volume 15 (1999) PUBLISHED BY THE ARGYLL BIRD CLUB Cover picture: Barnacle Geese by Margaret Staley The Fifteenth ARGYLL BIRD REPORT with Systematic List for the year 1998 Edited by J.C.A. Craik Assisted by P.C. Daw Systematic List by P.C. Daw Published by the Argyll Bird Club (Scottish Charity Number SC008782) October 1999 Copyright: Argyll Bird Club Printed by Printworks Oban - ABOUT THE ARGYLL BIRD CLUB The Argyll Bird Club was formed in 19x5. Its main purpose is to play an active part in the promotion of ornithology in Argyll. It is recognised by the Inland Revenue as a charity in Scotland. The Club holds two one-day meetings each year, in spring and autumn. The venue of the spring meeting is rotated between different towns, including Dunoon, Oban. LochgilpheadandTarbert.Thc autumn meeting and AGM are usually held in Invenny or another conveniently central location. The Club organises field trips for members. It also publishes the annual Argyll Bird Report and a quarterly members’ newsletter, The Eider, which includes details of club activities, reports from meetings and field trips, and feature articles by members and others, Each year the subscription entitles you to the ArgyZl Bird Report, four issues of The Eider, and free admission to the two annual meetings. There are four kinds of membership: current rates (at 1 October 1999) are: Ordinary E10; Junior (under 17) E3; Family €15; Corporate E25 Subscriptions (by cheque or standing order) are due on 1 January. Anyonejoining after 1 Octoberis covered until the end of the following year.
    [Show full text]
  • Sylvia Undata
    Sylvia undata -- (Boddaert, 1783) ANIMALIA -- CHORDATA -- AVES -- PASSERIFORMES -- SYLVIIDAE Common names: Dartford Warbler; European Red List Assessment European Red List Status NT -- Near Threatened, (IUCN version 3.1) Assessment Information Year published: 2015 Date assessed: 2015-03-31 Assessor(s): BirdLife International Reviewer(s): Symes, A. Compiler(s): Ashpole, J., Burfield, I., Ieronymidou, C., Pople, R., Wheatley, H. & Wright, L. Assessment Rationale European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT) EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT) This warbler is undergoing rapid population declines in Spain, which holds c.69% of the European and EU27 populations, but apparent increases in the second largest population, in Portugal, mean that overall declines have been moderately rapid. It is therefore classified as Near Threatened in both Europe and the EU27. Occurrence Countries/Territories of Occurrence Native: Andorra; France; Italy; Malta; Portugal; Spain; United Kingdom; Gibraltar (to UK) Vagrant: Belgium; Croatia; Czech Republic; Germany; Greece; Ireland, Rep. of; Montenegro; Netherlands; Serbia; Sweden; Switzerland; Turkey Population The European population is estimated at 646,000-1,480,000 pairs, which equates to 1,290,000-2,970,000 mature individuals. The entire population is found in the EU27. For details of national estimates, see Supplementary PDF. Trend In Europe and the EU27 the population size is estimated to be decreasing at a rate approaching 30% in 12.3 years (three generations). For details of national estimates, see Supplementary PDF. Habitats and Ecology It favours dense, homogeneous scrub, garrigue and low maquis c. 0.5–1.5 m in height and dominated by species such as Ulex, Erica, Rosmarinus, Genista, Cistus and Quercus coccifera.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Bird Communities Structured by Arthropod Availability?
    Revista Catalana d’Ornitologia 21:17-28, 2005 Post-fire dynamics in Mediterranean shrublands: are bird communities structured by arthropod availability? Sergi Herrando, Lluís Brotons & Santiago Llacuna The relationship between arthropod availability and bird energy requirements was studied in Mediterranean shrublands. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that food availability is a possible constraint in the recovery of bird communities in post-fire dynamics. We used the sweep-net sampling method to collect arthropods, and the point-census method to assess bird abundance. The censuses were carried out during the breeding and wintering seasons in a fire-free zone and in two burned zones (one burned four years before the fieldwork, the other 16 years before it). During the breeding season, we found a positive association between arthropod availability and bird requirements in all three zones. However, compared with the other two zones, the recently burned zone contained fewer birds than expected, based on arthropod availability. Thus, it seems that birds exerted significantly lower predation pressure on arthropod populations in this zone than in the other two zones, which resembled each other in this parameter. These results suggest that arthropod availability does not constrain breeding-bird numbers soon after fire; however, it could do so in later successional stages. During winter, when the studied bird species also feed on fleshy-fruits, there were no conclusive associations between arthropods and birds. Key words: arthropod availability, bird community, predation pressure, post-fire succession, burned zones, Mediterranean shrublands. Sergi Herrando, Institut Català d’Ornitologia, Museu de Ciències Naturals, Passeig Picasso s/n, 08003 Barcelona.
    [Show full text]
  • RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where Science Comes to Life
    RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where science comes to life Contents Knowing 2 Introducing the RSPB Centre for Conservation Science and an explanation of how and why the RSPB does science. A decade of science at the RSPB 9 A selection of ten case studies of great science from the RSPB over the last decade: 01 Species monitoring and the State of Nature 02 Farmland biodiversity and wildlife-friendly farming schemes 03 Conservation science in the uplands 04 Pinewood ecology and management 05 Predation and lowland breeding wading birds 06 Persecution of raptors 07 Seabird tracking 08 Saving the critically endangered sociable lapwing 09 Saving South Asia's vultures from extinction 10 RSPB science supports global site-based conservation Spotlight on our experts 51 Meet some of the team and find out what it is like to be a conservation scientist at the RSPB. Funding and partnerships 63 List of funders, partners and PhD students whom we have worked with over the last decade. Chris Gomersall (rspb-images.com) Conservation rooted in know ledge Introduction from Dr David W. Gibbons Welcome to the RSPB Centre for Conservation The Centre does not have a single, physical Head of RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Science. This new initiative, launched in location. Our scientists will continue to work from February 2014, will showcase, promote and a range of RSPB’s addresses, be that at our UK build the RSPB’s scientific programme, helping HQ in Sandy, at RSPB Scotland’s HQ in Edinburgh, us to discover solutions to 21st century or at a range of other addresses in the UK and conservation problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Sardinian Warbler Sylvia Melanocephala Displacing the Endemic Cyprus Warbler S
    Is the Sardinian Warbler Sylvia melanocephala displacing the endemic Cyprus Warbler S. melanothorax on Cyprus? PETER FLINT & ALISON MCARTHUR We firstly describe the history, status, distribution and habitats of the two species on the island. In the light of this the evidence for a decline in Cyprus Warbler numbers in the areas colonised by Sardinian Warbler is assessed and is found to be compelling. Possible reasons for this decline are examined; they are apparently complex, but primarily Cyprus Warbler appears to have stronger interspecific territoriality than Sardinian Warbler and may treat the latter territorially at least to some extent as a conspecific, with some tendency to avoid its home-ranges, especially their centres. Other important factors may be interspecific aggression from Sardinian Warbler (where its population density is high) which might reduce Cyprus Warbler’s ability to establish breeding territories; and competition from Sardinian Warbler for food and for autumn/winter territories. Also, Sardinian Warbler appears to be more efficient in exploiting the habitats of the endemic species, which may have reached a stage in its evolution as an island endemic where it is vulnerable to such an apparently fitter invading congener from the mainland. The changing climate on the island may also be a factor. We conclude that Sardinian Warbler does appear to be displacing Cyprus Warbler, and we recommend that the latter’s conservation status be re-assessed. INTRODUCTION Sardinian Warbler Sylvia melanocephala, previously known only as a winter visitor, was found breeding on Cyprus in 1992 (Frost 1995) and is rapidly spreading through the island (eg Cozens & Stagg 1998, Cyprus Ornithological Society (1957)/BirdLife Cyprus annual reports and newsletters, Ieronymidou et al 2012) often breeding at high densities within the same areas as the endemic Cyprus Warbler S.
    [Show full text]
  • Marmora's Warbler: New to Britain and Ireland J
    Marmora's Warbler: new to Britain and Ireland J. Lunn n the late evening of 15th May 1982, G. Lee telephoned me to say that, Iduring that day, at Mickleden Clough, Langsett, South Yorkshire, he had watched a small warbler which he could identify only as a Marmora's Warbler Sylvia sarda. At 07.00 GMT on the following morning, I located the continued.... [Brit. Birds 78: 475-481, October 1985] 475 476 Marmora's Warbler: new to Britain and Ireland bird and watched it for about 35 minutes before losing sight of it; shortly afterwards, it was found about 400m down the valley by other observers, including J. E. Dale. Its identity was confirmed as Marmora's Warbler. Throughout the next few months, until 22nd July, the warbler was watched by many hundreds of observers. It was photographed by A. V. Moon (Brit. Birds 75: plates 145 & 146), John T. Belsey, S. G. D. Cook and John Hewitt (plates 218-220). The record was subsequently accepted as the first for Marmora's Warbler in Britain and Ireland. Description First impressions were of a small warbler, strikingly blue-grey in colour, closely resembling a Dartford Warbler S. undata in shape, and with a noticeably long tail. PLUMAGE Striking: at a distance appeared brown-washed grey or buffy-grey; feather uniform blue-grey, recalling adult Cuckoo tips appeared abraded. Cuculus canorus, this emphasised by dark vege• BARE PARTS Legs originally described as tation background. At closer range, head straw-yellow, later as yellow-orange (differ• appeared darker, especially around lores, ence perhaps due to lighting effects?).
    [Show full text]
  • Songbird Remix Africa
    Avian Models for 3D Applications Characters and Procedural Maps by Ken Gilliland 1 Songbird ReMix Cool ‘n’ Unusual Birds 3 Contents Manual Introduction and Overview 3 Model and Add-on Crest Quick Reference 4 Using Songbird ReMix and Creating a Songbird ReMix Bird 5 Field Guide List of Species 9 Parrots and their Allies Hyacinth Macaw 10 Pigeons and Doves Luzon Bleeding-heart 12 Pink-necked Green Pigeon 14 Vireos Red-eyed Vireo 16 Crows, Jays and Magpies Green Jay 18 Inca or South American Green Jay 20 Formosan Blue Magpie 22 Chickadees, Nuthatches and their Allies American Bushtit 24 Old world Warblers, Thrushes and their Allies Wrentit 26 Waxwings Bohemian Waxwing 28 Larks Horned or Shore Lark 30 Crests Taiwan Firecrest 32 Fairywrens and their Allies Purple-crowned Fairywren 34 Wood Warblers American Redstart 37 Sparrows Song Sparrow 39 Twinspots Pink-throated Twinspot 42 Credits 44 2 Opinions expressed on this booklet are solely that of the author, Ken Gilliland, and may or may not reflect the opinions of the publisher, DAZ 3D. Songbird ReMix Cool ‘n’ Unusual Birds 3 Manual & Field Guide Copyrighted 2012 by Ken Gilliland - www.songbirdremix.com Introduction The “Cool ‘n’ Unusual Birds” series features two different selections of birds. There are the “unusual” or “wow” birds such as Luzon Bleeding Heart, the sleek Bohemian Waxwing or the patterned Pink-throated Twinspot. All of these birds were selected for their spectacular appearance. The “Cool” birds refer to birds that have been requested by Songbird ReMix users (such as the Hyacinth Macaw, American Redstart and Red-eyed Vireo) or that are personal favorites of the author (American Bushtit, Wrentit and Song Sparrow).
    [Show full text]
  • Desktop Biodiversity Report
    Desktop Biodiversity Report Land at Balcombe Parish ESD/14/747 Prepared for Katherine Daniel (Balcombe Parish Council) 13th February 2014 This report is not to be passed on to third parties without prior permission of the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre. Please be aware that printing maps from this report requires an appropriate OS licence. Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre report regarding land at Balcombe Parish 13/02/2014 Prepared for Katherine Daniel Balcombe Parish Council ESD/14/74 The following information is included in this report: Maps Sussex Protected Species Register Sussex Bat Inventory Sussex Bird Inventory UK BAP Species Inventory Sussex Rare Species Inventory Sussex Invasive Alien Species Full Species List Environmental Survey Directory SNCI M12 - Sedgy & Scott's Gills; M22 - Balcombe Lake & associated woodlands; M35 - Balcombe Marsh; M39 - Balcombe Estate Rocks; M40 - Ardingly Reservior & Loder Valley Nature Reserve; M42 - Rowhill & Station Pastures. SSSI Worth Forest. Other Designations/Ownership Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty; Environmental Stewardship Agreement; Local Nature Reserve; National Trust Property. Habitats Ancient tree; Ancient woodland; Ghyll woodland; Lowland calcareous grassland; Lowland fen; Lowland heathland; Traditional orchard. Important information regarding this report It must not be assumed that this report contains the definitive species information for the site concerned. The species data held by the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre (SxBRC) is collated from the biological recording community in Sussex. However, there are many areas of Sussex where the records held are limited, either spatially or taxonomically. A desktop biodiversity report from SxBRC will give the user a clear indication of what biological recording has taken place within the area of their enquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of a Meeting of the Parish Council of Longdon Held in the W
    07/1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE PARISH COUNCIL OF LONGDON HELD IN THE W. I. HALL, LONGDON, ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9TH, 2007 Present: Cllr. R. C. Hemmingsley (Vice-Chairman, who, in the absence of the Chairman, chaired the meeting); Cllr. N. J. Bird; Cllr. B. J. Butler; Cllr. A. J. Juxon; Cllr. Mrs. M. G. Nichols; and Cllr. H. M. P. Reynolds. Also present were the Clerk; Cllr. N. J. Roberts, of Lichfield District Council; County Councillor F. W. Lewis, M. B. E.; and Mrs. Jane Russell, Village Correspondent of “The Village Mercury”. 1. APOLOGIES Cllr. The Rev. J. R. Andrews; Cllr. N. Stanfield; Cllr. M. A. W. Parsons; and Cllr. S. K. Welch. 2. PRESENTATION BY CLLR. ROBERTS Before opening the meeting, Cllr. Hemmingsley invited Cllr. Roberts to make a presentation on the West Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy Phase Two Revision. Cllr. Roberts explained that the West Midlands Regional Assembly had just issued a document setting out spatial options for four planning areas – housing, employment, transport and waste. The main emphasis was on housing, for which a series of tables relating to housing distribution had been set out, together with three options – the first reflecting a continuum of previous figures, the second planning for a 25% increase and the third, the Government’s own preferred option, providing for a 50% increase. The adoption of the third of these options would result in an increase in the Lichfield area of 16,000 dwellings, which would be considerably larger than any other adjoining district except East Staffordshire and might even lead to development on the margins of the Green Belt.
    [Show full text]