DOCSLIB.ORG

Various Locations, Alaska FINAL REPORT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Various Locations, Alaska FINAL REPORT ALASKA BARGE LANDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT & DESIGN STATEWIDE PHASE 2 Various Locations, Alaska FINAL REPORT NOVEMBER 2010 Alaska Barge Landing System Assessment and Design Various Locations, Statewide, Alaska Phase 2 Prepared for: U.S. Army Engineer District, Alaska Anchorage, Alaska Prepared by: URS Corporation (W911KB-07-D-004) November 2010 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................1 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................1 2.0 PURPOSE.......................................................................................................2 3.0 ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT...............................................................3 4.0 STUDY AREA .................................................................................................4 4.1 Regions ..........................................................................................................4 5.0 STUDY METHOD............................................................................................6 6.0 SUMMARY OF DATA GATHERED................................................................7 6.1 Northern Southeast Alaska Region ........................................................... 11 6.1.1 Angoon.................................................................................................. 12 6.1.2 Douglas ................................................................................................. 14 6.1.3 Elfin Cove.............................................................................................. 15 6.1.4 Excursion Inlet...................................................................................... 16 6.1.5 Gustavus............................................................................................... 17 6.1.6 Haines ................................................................................................... 18 6.1.7 Hoonah.................................................................................................. 20 6.1.8 Juneau................................................................................................... 22 6.1.9 Kake....................................................................................................... 22 6.1.10 Pelican................................................................................................... 24 6.1.11 Sitka....................................................................................................... 25 6.1.12 Skagway................................................................................................ 26 6.1.13 Tenakee Springs................................................................................... 27 6.1.14 Yakutat .................................................................................................. 29 6.2 Southern Southeast Alaska Region........................................................... 30 6.2.1 Coffman Cove....................................................................................... 31 6.2.2 Craig ...................................................................................................... 32 6.2.3 Edna Bay............................................................................................... 33 6.2.4 Hollis ..................................................................................................... 34 6.2.5 Hydaburg .............................................................................................. 35 6.2.6 Hyder ..................................................................................................... 36 6.2.7 Kasaan .................................................................................................. 38 6.2.8 Ketchikan .............................................................................................. 38 6.2.9 Klawock................................................................................................. 40 6.2.10 Kupreanof ............................................................................................. 40 6.2.11 Metlakatla.............................................................................................. 41 6.2.12 Meyers Chuck....................................................................................... 42 6.2.13 Naukati Bay........................................................................................... 43 6.2.14 Petersburg ............................................................................................ 44 6.2.15 Point Baker ........................................................................................... 45 6.2.16 Port Alexander...................................................................................... 45 6.2.17 Port Protection ..................................................................................... 46 6.2.18 Saxman ................................................................................................. 47 6.2.19 Thorne Bay............................................................................................ 48 6.2.20 Whale Pass ........................................................................................... 49 6.2.21 Wrangell ................................................................................................ 50 6.3 Alaska Peninsula, Aleutians, and Pribilofs Region .................................. 52 6.3.1 Adak ...................................................................................................... 53 i 6.3.2 Attu ........................................................................................................ 54 6.3.3 Chignik .................................................................................................. 55 6.3.4 Cold Bay................................................................................................ 56 6.3.5 False Pass............................................................................................. 58 6.3.6 Ivanof Bay ............................................................................................. 59 6.3.7 King Cove ............................................................................................. 59 6.3.8 Nelson Lagoon ..................................................................................... 61 6.3.9 Nikolski ................................................................................................. 62 6.3.10 Perryville ............................................................................................... 63 6.3.11 Port Heiden ........................................................................................... 65 6.3.12 Port Moller ............................................................................................ 66 6.3.13 Saint George......................................................................................... 66 6.3.14 Saint Paul.............................................................................................. 67 6.3.15 Sand Point ............................................................................................ 68 6.3.16 Shemya ................................................................................................. 69 6.3.17 Ugashik ................................................................................................. 70 6.3.18 Unalaska ............................................................................................... 71 6.4 Kodiak Island Region.................................................................................. 73 6.4.1 Afognak................................................................................................. 74 6.4.2 Akhiok ................................................................................................... 75 6.4.3 Karluk .................................................................................................... 76 6.4.4 Kodiak ................................................................................................... 76 6.4.5 Kodiak Station ...................................................................................... 77 6.4.6 Larsen Bay............................................................................................ 78 6.4.7 Old Harbor ............................................................................................ 79 6.4.8 Ouzinkie ................................................................................................ 81 6.4.9 Port Lions ............................................................................................. 82 6.4.10 Womens Bay......................................................................................... 83 6.5 South-central Alaska Region...................................................................... 84 6.5.1 Chenega Bay......................................................................................... 85 6.5.2 Cordova................................................................................................. 86 6.5.3 Eyak....................................................................................................... 88 6.5.4 Halibut Cove ......................................................................................... 89 6.5.5 Homer.................................................................................................... 89 6.5.6 Kasilof ..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dredging and Disposal Plan
    DREDGING AND DISPOSAL PLAN PORT OF OLYMPIA MARINE BERTHS 2 & 3 INTERIM ACTION DREDGING Contract No.: 2008-0011 Project No. MT0601 Submitted To: Port of Olympia Attn: Rick Anderson 915 Washington Street NE Olympia, WA TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Dredging ..................................................................................................................... 1 Trans-loading ............................................................................................................. 1 Material Barge ............................................................................................................ 2 Dredge Bucket ............................................................................................................ 3 Dredge Sediment Disposal ........................................................................................ 3 Working Hours .......................................................................................................... 3 Position & Progress Surveys .................................................................................... 3 Dredge Navigation ...................................................................................................... 4 Survey Boat ................................................................................................................ 4 Water Quality BMP’s ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness in Southeastern Alaska: a History
    Wilderness in Southeastern Alaska: A History John Sisk Today, Southeastern Alaska (Southeast) is well known remoteness make it wild in the most definitive sense. as a place of great scenic beauty, abundant wildlife and The Tongass encompasses 109 inventoried roadless fisheries, and coastal wilderness. Vast expanses of areas covering 9.6 million acres (3.9 million hectares), wild, generally undeveloped rainforest and productive and Congress has designated 5.8 million acres (2.3 coastal ecosystems are the foundation of the region’s million hectares) of wilderness in the nation’s largest abundance (Fig 1). To many Southeast Alaskans, (16.8 million acre [6.8 million hectare]) national forest wilderness means undisturbed fish and wildlife habitat, (U.S. Forest Service [USFS] 2003). which in turn translates into food, employment, and The Wilderness Act of 1964 provides a legal business. These wilderness values are realized in definition for wilderness. As an indicator of wild subsistence, sport and commercial fisheries, and many character, the act has ensured the preservation of facets of tourism and outdoor recreation. To Americans federal lands displaying wilderness qualities important more broadly, wilderness takes on a less utilitarian to recreation, science, ecosystem integrity, spiritual value and is often described in terms of its aesthetic or values, opportunities for solitude, and wildlife needs. spiritual significance. Section 2(c) of the Wilderness Act captures the essence of wilderness by identifying specific qualities that make it unique. The provisions suggest wilderness is an area or region characterized by the following conditions (USFS 2002): Section 2(c)(1) …generally appears to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature, with the imprint of man’s work substantially unnoticeable; Section 2(c)(2) …has outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation; Section 2(c)(3) …has at least five thousand acres of land or is of sufficient FIG 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 4910-13 DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION Federal
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/21/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-20567, and on govinfo.gov 4910-13 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA-2020-0823; Airspace Docket No. 20-AAL-49] RIN 2120-AA66 Proposed Technical Amendment to Separate Terminal Airspace Areas from Norton Sound Low, Woody Island Low, Control 1234L, and Control 1487L Offshore Airspace Areas; Alaska AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend the following Offshore Airspace Areas in Alaska: Norton Sound Low, Woody Island Low, Control 1234L, and Control 1487L. The FAA found an error with the Offshore Airspace Legal Descriptions containing airspace descriptions not related to the need to apply IFR en route Air Traffic Control services in international airspace. This action would correct that error by removing terminal airspace, airspace associated with geographic coordinates, and airspace associated with NAVAIDs from the Offshore Airspace legal descriptions. DATES: Comments must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, D.C. 20590; telephone: 1(800) 647-5527, or (202) 366-9826. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2020-0823; Airspace Docket No. 20-AAL-49 at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • 4/15/2015 - Rk
    4/15/2015 - rk 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 4/15/2015 - rk PUBLIC ARTS COMMITTEE UNAPPROVED REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 2015 Session 15-01 a Regular Meeting of the Public Arts Committee was called to order on February 12, 2015 at 5:00 pm by Chair Michele Miller at the Homer City Hall Upstairs Conference Room located at 491 E. Pioneer Avenue, Homer, Alaska. PRESENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS MILLER, HOLLOWELL AND PETERSEN ABSENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS GRONING-PERSON AND APLIN (EXCUSED) STAFF: RENEE KRAUSE, CMC, DEPUTY CITY CLERK I The Committee met in a worksession from 4:00 p.m. until 4:45 p.m. Discussion on applications for a grant this year and the need to determine a suitable project and the draft Request for Proposal for a Consultant/Contractor to Inventory the Municipal Art Collection APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Chair Miller requested a motion to approve the agenda HOLLOWELL/PETERSEN – MOVED TO APPROVE. There was no discussion. The agenda was approved by consensus of the committee. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES (Minutes are approved during regular or special meetings only) A. Meeting Minutes for regular meeting of November 13, 2014. Chair Miller inquired if there was any issue with the minutes. Hearing none she requested a motion to approve the minutes as presented. PETERSEN/HOLLOWELL – MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. There was a brief discussion on seeing a possible misspelling but it was not immediately located within the document. Staff will review and correct. The minutes were approved by consensus of the Committee. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS ALREADY ON THE AGENDA There was no public present.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Bear (Ursus Arctos) John Schoen and Scott Gende Images by John Schoen
    Brown Bear (Ursus arctos) John Schoen and Scott Gende images by John Schoen Two hundred years ago, brown (also known as grizzly) bears were abundant and widely distributed across western North America from the Mississippi River to the Pacific and from northern Mexico to the Arctic (Trevino and Jonkel 1986). Following settlement of the west, brown bear populations south of Canada declined significantly and now occupy only a fraction of their original range, where the brown bear has been listed as threatened since 1975 (Servheen 1989, 1990). Today, Alaska remains the last stronghold in North America for this adaptable, large omnivore (Miller and Schoen 1999) (Fig 1). Brown bears are indigenous to Southeastern Alaska (Southeast), and on the northern islands they occur in some of the highest-density FIG 1. Brown bears occur throughout much of southern populations on earth (Schoen and Beier 1990, Miller et coastal Alaska where they are closely associated with salmon spawning streams. Although brown bears and grizzly bears al. 1997). are the same species, northern and interior populations are The brown bear in Southeast is highly valued by commonly called grizzlies while southern coastal populations big game hunters, bear viewers, and general wildlife are referred to as brown bears. Because of the availability of abundant, high-quality food (e.g. salmon), brown bears enthusiasts. Hiking up a fish stream on the northern are generally much larger, occur at high densities, and have islands of Admiralty, Baranof, or Chichagof during late smaller home ranges than grizzly bears. summer reveals a network of deeply rutted bear trails winding through tunnels of devil’s club (Oplopanx (Klein 1965, MacDonald and Cook 1999) (Fig 2).
    [Show full text]
  • NCITEC National Center for Intermodal Transportation for Economic Competitiveness
    National Center for Intermodal Transportation for Economic Competitiveness Final Report 525 The Impact of Modifying the Jones Act on US Coastal Shipping by Asaf Ashar James R. Amdal UNO Department of Planning and Urban Studies NCITEC National Center for Intermodal Transportation for Economic Competitiveness Supported by: 4101 Gourrier Avenue | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808 | (225) 767-9131 | www.ltrc.lsu.edu TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/LA.525 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date The Impact of Modifying the Jones Act on US Coastal June 2014 Shipping 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Asaf Ashar, Professor Research, UNOTI LTRC Project Number: 13-8SS James R. Amdal, Sr. Research Associate, UNOTI State Project Number: 30000766 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. University of New Orleans Department of Planning and Urban Studies 11. Contract or Grant No. 368 Milneburg Hall, 2000 Lakeshore Dr. New Orleans, LA 70148 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Louisiana Department of Transportation and Final Report Development July 2012 – December 2013 P.O. Box 94245 Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9245 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Conducted in Cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), Federal Highway Administration 16. Abstract The study assesses exempt coastal shipping defined as exempted from the US-built stipulation of the Jones Act, operating with functional crews and exempted from Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT). The study focuses on two research questions: (a) the impact of the US-built exemption on the cost of coastal shipping; and (b) the competitiveness of exempt services.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a Document Index
    APPENDIX A Document Index Alaska Aviation System Plan Document Index - 24 April 2008 Title Reference # Location / Electronic and/or Paper Copy Organization / Author Pub. Date Other Comments / Notes / Special Studies AASP's Use 1-2 AASP #1 1 WHPacific / Electronic & Paper Copies DOT&PF / TRA/Farr Jan-86 Report plus appendix AASP #2 DOT&PF / TRA-BV Airport 2 WHPacific / Electronic & Paper Copies Mar-96 Report plus appendix Consulting Statewide Transportation Plans Use 10 -19 2030 Let's Get Moving! Alaska Statewide Long-Range http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/lrtpp/SWLRTPHo 10 DOT&PF Feb-08 Technical Appendix also available Transportation Policy Plan Update me.shtml Regional Transportation Plans Use 20-29 Northwest Alaska Transportation Plan This plan is the Community Transportation Analysis -- there is 20 http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/nwplan.shtml DOT&PF Feb-04 also a Resource Transportation Analysis, focusing on resource development transportation needs Southwest Alaska Transportation Plan 21 http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/swplan.shtml DOT&PF / PB Consult Sep-04 Report & appendices available Y-K Delta Transportation Plan 22 http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/ykplan.shtml DOT&PF Mar-02 Report & appendices available Prince William Sound Area Transportation Plan 23 http://dot.alaska.gov/stwdplng/areaplans/pwsplan.shtml DOT&PF / Parsons Brinokerhoff Jul-01 Report & relevant technical memos available Southeast Alaska Transportation Plan http://www.dot.state.ak.us/stwdplng/projectinfo/ser/newwave 24 DOT&PF Aug-04
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968)
    Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968) Prepared by Amy Ramirez . Jeanne Lambin . Robert L. Meinhardt . and Casey Woster 2016 The Cultural Resource Programs of the National Park Service have responsibilities that include stewardship of historic buildings, museum collections, archeological sites, cultural landscapes, oral and written histories, and ethnographic resources. The material is based upon work assisted by funding from the National Park Service. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior. Printed 2018 Cover: Atwood Center, Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage, 2017, NPS photograph MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY ARCHITECTURE IN ALASKA HISTORIC CONTEXT (1945 – 1968) Prepared for National Park Service, Alaska Regional Office Prepared by Amy Ramirez, B.A. Jeanne Lambin, M.S. Robert L. Meinhardt, M.A. and Casey Woster, M.A. July 2016 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Historic Context as a Planning & Evaluation Tool ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 212/Friday, October 31
    Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 212 / Friday, October 31, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 64881 compliance with the requirements of National Archives and Records the airspace description revealed that it paragraph (f)(2) of this AD. Administration (NARA). For information on contained two items that were the availability of this material at NARA, call FAA AD Differences unnecessary. The Norton Sound Low (202) 741–6030, or go to: http:// _ 1,200 foot description for Selawik, AK, Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ www.archives.gov/federal register/ is not required. Similarly, the 1,200 ft. or service information as follows: No code_of_federal_regulations/ differences. ibr_locations.html. description for Control 1234L had duplicate references to Eareckson Air Other FAA AD Provisions Issued in Renton, Washington, on October Force Station. These two items are 9, 2008. (g) The following provisions also apply to addressed in the airspace descriptions Ali Bahrami, this AD: below. With the exception of editorial (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, changes, this amendment is the same as (AMOCs): The Manager, International Aircraft Certification Service. that proposed in the NPRM. Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane [FR Doc. E8–25307 Filed 10–30–08; 8:45 am] These airspace areas are published in Directorate, FAA, has the authority to BILLING CODE 4910–13–P paragraph 6007 of FAA Order 7400.9R, approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested signed August 15, 2007, and effective using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. September 15, 2007, which is Send information to ATTN: Shahram DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Admiralty Island National Monument
    ADMIRALTY ISLAND NATIONAL MONUMENT DESCRIPTION At a glance: Admiralty Island National Monument (NM) is located on Admiralty Island NM quick facts Admiralty Island, 15 miles southwest of Juneau in south- east Alaska, and is accessible only by water or air. The Date established: Dec. 1, 1978; Dec. 2, 1980 island is characterized by rugged coastline, remote old growth rainforest, towering mountains, and alpine tundra Established by: Presidential proclamation, President with permanent icefields. It hosts the largest concentration Jimmy Carter (1978); Congressional designation, Public of brown bears and nesting bald eagles in the world, as Law 96-487 (1980) well as harbor seals, porpoises and sea lions, humpback Forest Service region: 10, Alaska Region whales, and all five species of Pacific salmon in its waters. More than 90 percent of the monument is designated as State: Alaska the Kootznoowoo Wilderness, nearly 1 million acres. Ad- Associated national forest: Tongass miralty Island has been the home to the Tlingít people for approximately 10,000 years. The monument area continues Total Forest Service acres: 997,226 to provide subsistence for these Alaskan Natives. Angoon, Reasons designated: “archaeological, cultural, and Admiralty Island’s only permanent community, continues historical resources, ecological and scientific value” to be an important cultural base. (Presidential Proclamation, 1978) BACKGROUND The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANSCA) of 1971 honored the rights of Alaska Natives to select approxi- People and visitors mately 44 million acres of Federal land in Alaska and au- thorized the Secretary of the Interior to withdraw 80 mil- Nearest metropolitan area: no metro areas within lion acres of land to be studied for possible additions to 500 miles the National Park, Wildlife Refuge, Wild and Scenic Rivers, and National Forest systems.
    [Show full text]