DOCSLIB.ORG

Operation and Maintenance Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operation and Maintenance Overview OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (COMPTROLLER)/CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER FEBRUARY 2020 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OVERVIEW Irreversible Implementation of the National Defense Strategy UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE I FISCAL YEAR 2021 BUDGET ESTIMATES 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW Page MAJOR ACTIVITIES – continued Page O&M Title Summary ...............................................................1 Facilities Sustainment, Repair & Modernization and Demolition Programs ........................................................106 APPROPRIATION HIGHLIGHTS Mobilization ...........................................................................114 Training and Education ..........................................................1 Army .........................................................................................6 20 Recruiting, Advertising, and Examining ...............................1 Navy ..........................................................................................7 29 Command, Control, and Communications (C3) ....................1 Marine Corps ............................................................................8 33 Transportation ........................................................................1 Air Force ...................................................................................9 37 Prisoner of War and Missing Personnel Affairs Space Force .............................................................................10 (POW/MIA) Programs….. ................................................141 Defense-Wide .........................................................................11 Reserve Forces ........................................................................12 Cooperative Threat Reduction Program .................................20 OTHER DATA Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Account ........27 Civilian Personnel ..................................................................143 Defense Health Program .........................................................29 Contract Services ...................................................................155 Drug Interdiction and Counterdrug Activities ........................31 Active Force Military Personnel ............................................161 Environmental Programs ........................................................36 SOCOM Military Personnel ..................................................164 Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid ...................45 Selected Reserve and Guard Personnel ..................................165 Office of the Inspector General ...............................................46 General and Flag Officer Reduction Plan ..............................168 Support of International Sporting Competitions .....................47 Reforms and Major DoD Headquarters .................................172 DoD Customer Fuel Prices ....................................................181 MAJOR ACTIVITIES European Deterrence Initiative (EDI)………………………183 Overseas Cost Summary ........................................................ Land Forces .............................................................................48 186 Foreign Currency Fluctuation Rates ...................................... Ship Operations .......................................................................55 190 Explosive Ordnance Disposal Funding (EOD)…………….. Air Operations .........................................................................61 191 United States Special Operations Command ..........................77 Military Information Support Operations (MISO) .................81 APPENDIX Depot Maintenance .................................................................83 World Wide Web Address .....................................................192 Body Armor and Other Protective Gear .................................92 M-1 Report .............................................................................193 Base Operations Support.........................................................98 O-1 and RF-1 Reports ............................................................237 Civilian Personnel Costs (OP-8) ............................................336 Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) .............................340 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preparation of this report/study cost the Department of Defense a total of approximately $55,000 for Fiscal Year 2020. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE TITLE SUMMARY O&M BY SERVICE BY APPROPRIATION $ in Millions FY 2019/1 FY 2020/2 FY 2021/3 Funding Summary Actual Enacted Estimate Army 78,062.2 75,595.4 72,779.3 Active 62,296.2 59,633.1 57,450.7 Reserve 2,829.0 3,022.1 2,968.1 National Guard 7,268.8 7,545.2 7,499.8 Afghanistan Security Forces Fund 4,316.0 4,200.0 4,015.6 Counter-ISIS Train and Equip Fund 1,352.2 1,195.0 845.0 Navy 64,120.2 66,796.6 70,266.2 Navy Active 54,057.3 56,394.9 60,393.0 Marine Corps Active 8,738.8 8,978.3 8,431.2 Navy Reserve 1,051.9 1,125.7 1,148.5 Marine Corps Reserve 272.2 297.8 293.4 Air Force 61,974.1 63,207.0 65,598.7 Active 52,407.9 53,077.7 52,680.6 Space Force 0.0 40.0 2,608.4 Reserve 3,163.9 3,257.1 3,380.4 National Guard 6,402.2 6,832.2 6,929.3 Defense-Wide and Other 78,964.7 84,143.1 80,429.2 Defense-Wide 43,384.3 45,899.3 44,671.3 Defense Health Program4 34,197.3 34,428.3 33,055.5 Numbers may not add due to rounding 1 FY 2019 includes Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) funding 2 FY 2020 does not reflect $976.7 million of Emergency funding and $1,121.5 million of prior year recissions 3 FY 2021 includes $58,568.8 million of OCO funding for Direct War costs, Enduring OCO requirements, and OCO for Base requirements 4 Includes transfers to the Department of Veterans Affairs of $142 million in FY 2020 and $127 million in FY 2021 5 FY 2019 Environmental Restoration and Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense accounts were executed in FY 2019 Operation and Maintenance accounts OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE TITLE SUMMARY 1 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE TITLE SUMMARY O&M TOTAL BUDGET AUTHORITY BY SERVICE BY APPROPRIATION/1/2 $ in Millions FY 2019/1 FY 2020/2 FY 2021/3 Funding Summary Actual Enacted Estimate Cooperative Threat Reduction 350.3 373.7 238.5 Office of the Inspector General 380.9 387.8 395.5 Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster Assistance and Civic Aid 117.7 135.0 109.9 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces 14.6 14.8 15.2 DoD Acquisition Workforce Development Fund 450.0 400.0 58.2 Environmental Restoration, Army/5 251.7 207.5 Environmental Restoration, Navy/5 385.0 335.9 Environmental Restoration, Air Force/5 485.0 303.9 Environmental Restoration, Defense/5 19.0 9.1 Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS)/5 275.0 216.6 Drug Interdiction And Counter-Drug Activities, Defense/5 1,046.2 769.6 Contributions to the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program 24.8 International Sporting Competitions 1.2 Disposal of Real Property 9.3 8.1 9.7 Lease of Real Property 34.3 34.4 32.6 Total 283,121.2 289,742.1 289,073.2 The FY 2021 Operation and Maintenance (O&M) programs are driven by the National Defense Strategy. The budget decisions reflected in the subsequent exhibits in the O&M Overview Book fund a joint force in FY 2021 with the capacity and capability to: • Achieve success in competition with China and Russia, which is currently a central challenge to U.S. security – Deter aggression and maintain favorable balances of power in key regions – Prioritize preparedness for war and expand competitive space • Sustain efforts to deter and counter Iran, North Korea, and terrorists OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE TITLE SUMMARY 2 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE TITLE SUMMARY – Prevent or deter state adversaries and non-state actors from acquiring, proliferating, or using weapons of mass destruction – Prevent terrorists from directing or supporting external operations against U.S., allies and partners overseas • Continue three lines of efforts to enable U.S. to remain world’s preeminent fighting force: – Build a more lethal Joint Force – Strengthen alliances as we attract new partners – Reform the Department’s business practices for greater performance and affordability The FY 2021 O&M programs continues the path to achieving full spectrum readiness across the Joint Force and advances the Department’s multi-pronged, multi-year approach to build a more lethal and ready force with targeted investments in training, equipment, maintenance, munitions, modernization and infrastructure. The FY 2021 programs support Combatant Command exercises and engagements to increase joint training capabilities, reassure allies, and provide U.S. presence. The FY 2021 Army programs decrease overall due to reductions in activities related to Overseas Contingency Operations. The Army’s request supports increased global force employment readiness and larger scale rotations/multi-lateral exercises in the Indo-Pacific Area of Responsibility. The FY 2021 Navy program builds on prior readiness investments to sustain current gains. The Navy continues to focus on modernization efforts to improve throughput at naval shipyards and reduce lost operational days due to maintenance overruns. Similarly, the Navy continues to modernize and upgrade facilities and equipment at the aviation depots. The FY 2021 Marine Corps programs, while an overall reduction, supports an increased presence and focus on the Indo-Pacific region; continued efforts to enhance field logistics capabilities to improve battlespace awareness and increase lethality; fund facility
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Decision-Making Process in Combat Operations
    DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN MILITARY COMBAT OPERATIONS 4120/002 10.2013 2000 10.2013 4120/002 International Committee of the Red Cross 19, avenue de la Paix 1202 Geneva, Switzerland T +41 22 734 60 01 F +41 22 733 20 57 E-mail: [email protected] www.icrc.org © ICRC, October 2013 DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN MILITARY COMBAT OPERATIONS PREFACE Every state has an obligation to ensure respect for the law of armed conflict. The ICRC is mandated to support states in these efforts and does so through a range of activities, including promoting the integration of appropriate com- pliance measures into military doctrine, education, training and sanctions, with a view to ensuring that behaviours of those engaged in armed conflict comply with the law. The present note is designed to support the integration of the Law of Armed Conflict into military decision-making processes, primarily at the operational level. It is not based on any specific national doctrine. It is designed to support those responsible for developing national doctrine and operational planning procedures in their efforts to integrate the Law of Armed Conflict into military practice. The desired outcome is staff procedures which ensure the development of military plans and orders that accurately and effectively integrate compliance with the Law of Armed Conflict into operational practice, thereby reducing the effects of armed conflict on those who do not, or no longer, participate in the hostilities. The techniques of warfare change rapidly, particularly at times when combat operations are commonplace. The humanitarian impact of conflict is timeless. The Law of Armed Conflict is designed to limit the humanitarian consequences of war.
    [Show full text]
  • Blitzkrieg: the Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht's
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2021 Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era Briggs Evans East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Evans, Briggs, "Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era" (2021). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3927. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3927 This Thesis - unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era ________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ______________________ by Briggs Evans August 2021 _____________________ Dr. Stephen Fritz, Chair Dr. Henry Antkiewicz Dr. Steve Nash Keywords: Blitzkrieg, doctrine, operational warfare, American military, Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe, World War II, Cold War, Soviet Union, Operation Desert Storm, AirLand Battle, Combined Arms Theory, mobile warfare, maneuver warfare. ABSTRACT Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era by Briggs Evans The evolution of United States military doctrine was heavily influenced by the Wehrmacht and their early Blitzkrieg campaigns during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 28 September 2012
    United Nations A/67/182/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 September 2012 Original: English Sixty-seventh session Agenda item 80 Status of the Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and relating to the protection of victims of armed conflicts Status of the Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and relating to the protection of victims of armed conflicts Report of the Secretary-General Addendum I. Introduction The present addendum contains information from nine additional replies to the request contained in paragraph 11 of General Assembly resolution 65/29, received subsequent to the submission of the main report, from Belgium, France, Madagascar, Mexico, Slovenia, Sweden, Togo, Switzerland and the International Committee of the Red Cross.1 II. Information received from Member States Belgium Belgium referred to its 2008 contribution, summarized in the report of the Secretary-General (A/63/118), and to its 2010 report, summarized in the report of the Secretary-General for the period 2008 to August 2010 (A/65/138/Add.1). Since that report, the most noteworthy events for Belgium have been the following: __________________ 1 The full texts of the replies are available for review on the website of the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly (http://www.un.org/ga/sixth), sixty-seventh session, “Status of the Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and relating to the protection of victims of armed conflicts”, report of the Secretary-General; full texts of the replies. 12-52827 (E) 181012
    [Show full text]
  • 01-14-2019 19:25___Executive Summary__The Gnassingbé Clan Has Ruled the Country Since 1967. the Demand
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive BTI -2022 Togo Country Report : political and socio-economic development, 2019-2020 [enhanced author’s version] Kohnert, Dirk Institute of African Affairs, GIGA-Hamburg 28 December 2020 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/107022/ MPRA Paper No. 107022, posted 10 Apr 2021 04:25 UTC Author’s extended and annotated version of BTI 2022 – Togo Country Report’, forthcoming Togo’s Political and Socio-Economic Development (2019 – 2021) Dirk Kohnert 1 Source: “No, to 50 years more”, Africa Youth Movement statement on protest in Togo #TogoDebout/ iDA Abstract: The Gnassingbé clan has ruled the country since 1967. The demand for political alternance, constituted the major contentious issue between the government and the challengers of the Gnassingbé regime throughout the survey period. The first local elections since more than 30 years took finally place on 30 June 2019 and resulted in the victory of the ruling party. Shortly afterwards, in February 2020, the President won also the disputed presidential elections and thus consolidated his power, assisted by the loyal army and security services. The outbreak of the Corona epidemic in Togo in April 2020 and the subsequent economic recession may have contributed to limit popular protest against the Gnassingbé regime. The human rights record of the government has improved but remains poor. Despite undeniable improvements to the framework and appearance of the regime's key institutions during the review period, democracy remains far from complete. However, the international community, notably Togo’s African peers, the AU and ECOWAS, followed a ‘laissez-faire’ approach in the interests of regional stability and their national interests in dealing with Togo.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Politics of Defense Reviews
    C O R P O R A T I O N The History and Politics of Defense Reviews Raphael S. Cohen For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2278 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9973-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The 1993 Bottom-Up Review starts with this challenge: “Now that the Cold War is over, the questions we face in the Department of Defense are: How do we structure the armed forces of the United States for the future? How much defense is enough in the post–Cold War era?”1 Finding a satisfactory answer to these deceptively simple questions not only motivated the Bottom-Up Review but has arguably animated defense strategy for the past quarter century.
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Media Awards Nomination Guidance for Calendar Year 2020
    MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER/G-6, HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, CHIEF OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF U.S. MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATION, HEADQUARTERS MARINE CORPS CHIEF OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, U.S. COAST GUARD SUBJECT: Request for Nominations to the 2020 Defense Media Awards This memorandum is the call for nominations to the 2020 Defense Media Awards. Attached is the fifth iteration of the DoD-level awards program guidance designed by your designated public affairs and visual information representatives. There are no significant changes to this year’s nomination criteria. The number of categories remains at nine: Defense Communicator of the Year, Civilian and Military Graphic Designer of the Year, Civilian and Military Videographer of the Year, Civilian and Military Photographer of the Year, the Thomas Jefferson Civilian Print Journalist of the Year and the Thomas Jefferson Military Print Journalist of the Year. Each Service may submit one nomination for each category. Submit nominations in accordance with the attached guidance no later than March 29, 2021. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Chad McMeen at (301) 677-2042 or [email protected]. Thank you for your support. Paul R. Haverstick, Jr. Colonel, U.S. Army Acting Director Attachment: As stated Defense Media Awards Nomination Guidance for Calendar Year 2020 Defense Media Activity 6700 Taylor Ave. Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755 [email protected] Defense Media Awards Nomination Guidance for Calendar Year 2020 Table of Contents I.
    [Show full text]
  • American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and Statistics
    American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and Statistics Updated July 29, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32492 American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and Statistics Summary This report provides U.S. war casualty statistics. It includes data tables containing the number of casualties among American military personnel who served in principal wars and combat operations from 1775 to the present. It also includes data on those wounded in action and information such as race and ethnicity, gender, branch of service, and cause of death. The tables are compiled from various Department of Defense (DOD) sources. Wars covered include the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, the Civil War, the Spanish-American War, World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam Conflict, and the Persian Gulf War. Military operations covered include the Iranian Hostage Rescue Mission; Lebanon Peacekeeping; Urgent Fury in Grenada; Just Cause in Panama; Desert Shield and Desert Storm; Restore Hope in Somalia; Uphold Democracy in Haiti; Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF); Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF); Operation New Dawn (OND); Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR); and Operation Freedom’s Sentinel (OFS). Starting with the Korean War and the more recent conflicts, this report includes additional detailed information on types of casualties and, when available, demographics. It also cites a number of resources for further information, including sources of historical statistics on active duty military deaths, published lists of military personnel killed in combat actions, data on demographic indicators among U.S. military personnel, related websites, and relevant CRS reports. Congressional Research Service American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and Statistics Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibious Warfare: Theory and Practice* Tomoyuki Ishizu
    Amphibious Warfare: Theory and Practice* Tomoyuki Ishizu Introduction In December 2013, the Government of Japan released its first “National Security Strategy” and announced the “National Defense Program Guidelines for FY 2014 and beyond.” The new Guidelines set forth the buildup of “dynamic joint defense force,” calling for a sufficient amphibious operations capability by means of amphibious vehicles and tilt-rotor aircraft, for example, to cope with potential enemy attack against any of Japan’s remote islands. This paper analyzes amphibious warfare from a historical viewpoint to show its major framework and concept. It is no wonder that the scale and form of amphibious operations may differ significantly among states depending on their national strategy, status of military power in the national strategy, military objectives, and historical or geographical conditions. The reason is that the national strategy, which is prescribed according to the national history, geography, culture and more, determines the role of the nation’s military force and way of fighting. With all these facts taken into account, this paper attempts to propose a general framework for examining amphibious warfare, especially for amphibious operations, and to sort out ideas and terms used in such operations. 1. What are Amphibious Operations? (1) The issues surrounding their definition The first issue that one inevitably encounters in examining amphibious operations is the ambiguity surrounding their definition. Without a uniform understanding of the meaning of amphibious operations and of their associated concepts and terminologies, the actual execution of operations will likely be met with difficulties. Nevertheless, a uniform understanding or a “common language” for the associated concepts and terminologies has not been arrived at, not even in the United States, which has conducted many amphibious operations.
    [Show full text]
  • TOGOLESE REPUBLIC Work-Liberty-Fatherland 6Th, 7Th and 8Th PERIODIC REPORTS of the STATE of TOGO on the IMPLEMENTATION of the A
    TOGOLESE REPUBLIC Work-Liberty-Fatherland 6th, 7th and 8th PERIODIC REPORTS OF THE STATE OF TOGO ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AFRICAN CHARTER ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS (Article 62 of the Charter) August 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 14 PART ONE ........................................................................................................................................ 15 OVERALL LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION . .............................. 15 PART TWO ...................................................................................................................................... 17 NATIONAL MEASURES ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CHARTER . ........................ 17 Articles 2 and 3 : The right to the enjoyment of rights and freedoms recognised and guaranteed by the Charter without distinction of any kind and equality before the law .......................................... 17 Article 4 : The protection of the right to life ..................................................................................... 17 The Death Penalty .............................................................................................................................. 17 Articles 6 : The right to liberty and to the security of the person, prohibition from arrests or arbitrary detentions .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force World by Autumn A
    Air Force World By Autumn A. Arnett, Associate Editor House Passes Fiscal 2015 Defense Spending Bill Langley-Eustis, Va. Carlisle has served as commander of The House approved HR 4870, its version of the Fiscal Pacifi c Air Forces at JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, since 2015 defense spending bill, June 20, providing $491 bil- August 2012. lion in discretionary funding and $79.4 billion for overseas Obama also on July 15 nominated Lt. Gen. Lori J. Robinson contingency operations, including the war in Afghanistan. for a fourth star and for assignment as commander of Pacifi c Air Among the Air Force-related amendments adopted on Forces. She has been ACC vice commander since May 2013. the House fl oor is one introduced by Rep. Candice Miller (R-Mich.) that blocked the Air Force from using Fiscal 2015 funds to divest, retire, transfer, or place into storage any A-10 aircraft or to dissolve any A-10 units. An amendment brought forth by Rep. Jon Runyan (R-N.J.) that prohibits KC-10 retirements in Fiscal 2015 also passed. The House in May passed its version of the Fiscal 2015 screenshot defense authorization bill, which also prevents divestiture of the A-10 fl eet. Medal of Honor Awarded to Marine President Barack Obama awarded the Medal of Honor to retired Marine Corps Cpl. William “Kyle” Carpenter, 24, on June 19 for his conspicuous gallantry during a 2010 battle in Afghanistan where he was seriously injured. “Anybody who has had a chance to get to know this young man knows you’re not going to get a better example of what you want in an American or a marine,” said Obama during the White House ceremony.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force World by Amy Mccullough, News Editor
    Air Force World By Amy McCullough, News Editor Three Airmen Die in Japan Sept. 29 realigned the 9th Reconnaissance Wing at Beale Three airmen on temporary duty at Kadena Air Base on the AFB, Calif., and the 55th Wing at Offutt AFB, Neb., under Japanese island of Okinawa died Oct. 5. They were washed 25th Air Force. out to sea as Typhoon Phanfone raged around the island. SMSgt. James Swartz, 51, was pronounced dead at a local hospital after the Japanese Coast Guard pulled him from the sea. He was an aerospace propulsion superintendent with the 116th Air Control Wing, Robins AFB, Ga. screenshot HH-60s from Kadena and the Japanese Coast Guard searched for the remaining two airmen, MSgt. Daniel Paschal, 34, and SSgt. Joshua Schoenhoff, 27. Rough seas complicated the rescue efforts, but their bodies were recovered on Oct. 7 and 8. Paschal, also with the 116th Air Control Wing, was an aerospace propulsion craftsman. Schoenhoff was an instru- ment and fl ight control specialist with the 461st Air Control 10.05.2014 Wing at Robins. Airmen at Robins AFB, Ga., prepare to load a C-60 Lodestar Welcome Back, 19th Air Force aircraft into a C-5M Super Galaxy to transport it to the Air Air Education and Training Command reactivated 19th Mobility Command Museum at Dover AFB, Del. The C-5M is Air Force on Oct. 1. The new numbered air force, which had USAF’s only transport capable of carrying the World War II-era been inactivated in 2012, was brought back at the direction of aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • 13.1. for COMPONENT ASSIGNMENTS. CMD Will Use The
    13.1. FOR COMPONENT ASSIGNMENTS. CMD will use the digraphs and trigraphs in Table 26 for the DoD and OSD Component heads, as appropriate, when assigning actions in CATMS, in suspense reports, and on the SD Form 391. Questions regarding them may be directed to CMD at whs.pentagon.esd.mbx.cmd- [email protected]. Table 26. Digraphs and Trigraphs for Action or Information Component Assigned OSD Entities SD Secretary of Defense (Assign Action to ES) DSD Deputy Secretary of Defense COS The Special Assistant to the Secretary and Deputy Secretary of Defense MAS Military Assistan t to the Secretary of Defense MAD Military Assistan t to the Deputy Secretary of Defense COS Chief of Staff ES Executive Secretary of the Department of Defense ESR Executive Secretariat Rear ESW Executive Secretary White House Actions PRO Protocol SDS Secretary of Defense Scheduling DS Deputy Secretary of Defense Scheduling TNT Transition T eam USA Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment URE Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering USP Under Secretary of Defense for Policy USC Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)/Chief Financial Officer UPR Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness USI Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security CMO Chief Management Officer CIO DoD Chief Information Officer LA Assistant Secretary of Defense for Legislative Affairs PA Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs GC General Counsel of the Department of Defense OTE Director of Operational Test and Evaluation CAP Director, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation IG Inspector General of the Department of Defense NA Director of Net Assessment Military Departments SA Secretary of the Army SAF Secretary of the Air Force SN Secretary of the Navy SECTION 13: OFFICIAL DIGRAPHS AND TRIGRAPHS 86 DoDM 5110.04, Volume 1, June 16, 2020 Table 26.
    [Show full text]