Ecuador As Victim: the Development of the Discourse on the Territorial Dispute with Peru, 1860-1981

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecuador As Victim: the Development of the Discourse on the Territorial Dispute with Peru, 1860-1981 University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2018-08-29 Ecuador as Victim: The Development of the Discourse on the Territorial Dispute with Peru, 1860-1981 Lalama Vargas, Andres Leonardo Lalama Vargas, A. L. (2018). Ecuador as Victim: The Development of the Discourse on the Territorial Dispute with Peru, 1860-1981 (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary. Calgary, AB doi:10.11575/PRISM/32893 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/107717 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Ecuador as Victim: The Development of the Discourse on the Territorial Dispute with Peru, 1860-1981 by Andres Leonardo Lalama Vargas A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA AUGUST, 2018 © Andres Leonardo Lalama Vargas 2018 Abstract This thesis investigates the historical trajectory of the dominant Ecuadorian narrative of its territorial conflict with Peru. Through qualitative discourse analysis of monographs, pamphlets, and textbooks dedicated to the long conflict, it shows the development of a discussion with its own consistency and internal logic, a discourse in the Foucauldian sense. Above all, this discourse possessed a nation-building logic in which Peru was depicted as its main existential threat and nemesis. Thanks to this discourse, the long and complex territorial dispute became a means to achieve and strengthen national cohesion, and to strengthen the idea of Ecuadorian nation. Given that the political, cultural, and economic rapprochement that Ecuador and Peru experienced after the final peace settlement of 1998 contributed to a decades-long radical reformulation of the idea of Ecuadorian national community, this thesis aims to contribute to the understanding of Ecuadorian nationalism by analyzing one of its key aspects in relation to the country’s territory and an external other. ii Preface This thesis began with a personal interest in finding out more about the Ecuador-Peru conflict. One day in the summer of 2016, before the start of the Graduate Program in History at the University of Calgary, I came across the Wikipedia article about the Paquisha War of 1981, one of the several border clashes between Ecuador and Peru in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The narrative contradicted the idea of Ecuadorian territorial victimization in the hands of Peru that I had learned in school regarding this and all the other episodes of the century-old conflict between the Andean neighbours. Feeling somewhat outraged but not surprised that I had learned a version of history that completely favoured one side of the story, I decided to investigate more about the matter, not from the point of view of military history, but to find out how of the narrative of the conflict that I learned in my childhood had become the sole version taught in schools. The results of this investigation are presented in the following pages. The archival research for this thesis was conducted mostly in Quito, at the library of the Ministerio de Cultura y Patrimonio, the Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Movilidad Humana’s Alfredo Pareja Diezcanseco and Archivo del Departamento de Soberanía Nacional, and at the Archivo Nacional del Ecuador. It also includes sources available online from the Biblioteca Nacional Eugenio Espejo, Hathi Trust, HeinOnline, Spain’s Biblioteca Nacional de España and Biblioteca Virtual del Patrimonio Bibliográfico, and the Cervantes Virtual online library. The videos discussed in the introduction and chapter 3 are available on YouTube, and the interviews to the veterans in the conclusion are available in The Diario La Prensa (Riobamba) Facebook page. iii Acknowledgments Above all, I thank God for the gift of life. I would also like to thank the people whose love, care, sacrifices, and help made it possible to pursue my dreams in Canada, and to make me the person I am today. I want to thank my parents for bringing me to Canada, and especially because they taught me to love learning. Mamá Tere for her undying love. My dear friend Adriana Rincón for giving me support and strength during the months of research and writing, and that happiness that comes from true friendship. Thanks to my supervisor, Amelia Kiddle, for her constant guidance through my journey as a graduate student and apprentice historian. The members of my committee, Hendrik Kraay and Elizabeth Montes, for their time and interest in this investigation. Monique Greenwood, Pablo Policzer, Rogelio Vélez Mendoza, David Barrios, and the fellows at the Latin American Research Centre, where I found a warm and welcoming place of debate, discussion, and friendship. I am grateful to my professors, especially Carolee Pollock, my classmates, and all the people at the Departments of History at Grant MacEwan University and the University of Calgary, for encouraging me to become the best scholar I could be. In Ecuador, I would like to thank the librarians and archivists at Quito’s Ministerio de Cultura y Patrimonio, the Foreign Ministry’s Archivo Histórico Alfredo Pareja Diezcanseco and Archivo del Departamento de Soberanía Nacional, and the Archivo Nacional del Ecuador, who kindly and patiently helped find the primary sources for this investigation. I am also grateful to Lucy Freire, my uncles, and my cousins in Riobamba, for helping me realize that history lives not only in the archives but in the memory of the people. Thanks to all my friends in Edmonton, Red Deer, Calgary, and anywhere else I might forget, for making graduate school life easier and happier. Finally, thanks to Daniela Villamar for believing in me before anyone else did. iv A la memoria de mi tía Rosita v Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... ii Preface ......................................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................ iv Dedication ..................................................................................................................................................... v Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ viii Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 A Brief History of the Ecuador-Peru Territorial Dispute .......................................................................... 4 Sources on Ecuadorian Nationalism and the Ecuador – Peru Conflict ................................................... 11 Historiography of the Ecuador-Peru Conflict ......................................................................................... 13 Theoretical Framework ........................................................................................................................... 22 Structure of this Thesis ........................................................................................................................... 24 1. Published Sources on the Ecuador-Peru Conflict Before 1941............................................................... 26 Nineteenth-Century Discourses on the Ecuador-Peru Conflict .............................................................. 29 The Early Twentieth Century: Honorato Vázquez, Enrique Vacas Galindo, and other works on the Ecuador-Peru Dispute ............................................................................................................................. 37 Other Works before 1941: The Oriente and the Ecuador-Peru Dispute ................................................. 44 The Pedemonte-Mosquera Protocol and the End of the Spanish Arbitration ......................................... 50 Published Sources on the Ecuador-Peru Conflict in the 1920s and 1930s .............................................. 54 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 60 2. The Discourse on the Ecuador-Peru Conflict from the War of 1941 to the Nullity Thesis .................... 62 Propagandistic Literature on the Ecuador-Peru Conflict ........................................................................ 65 Explaining the War and the Rio Protocol: Monographs and Essays on the Territorial Conflict ............ 81 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 98 3. The Consolidation
Recommended publications
  • Vicepresidentes En La Historia Vicepresidentes Periodo Vicepresidencial Presidentes Periodo Presidencial
    VICEPRESIDENTES EN LA HISTORIA VICEPRESIDENTES PERIODO VICEPRESIDENCIAL PRESIDENTES PERIODO PRESIDENCIAL Proyecto Republicano: construcción de la República del Ecuador (1830 al 1861) José Joaquín de Olmedo, primer Vicepresidente. 12 de septiembre de 1830 – José Modesto Larrea, segundo 15 de septiembre de 1831. Juan José Flores y Aramburu 13 de mayo 1830 al 22 de septiembre 1830 Vicepresidente; reemplaza a José 1831 – 1835 Joaquín de Olmedo. Vicente Rocafuerte se proclama Jefe 10 de septiembre 1834 al 22 de junio 1835 Supremo de Guayaquil. José Féliz Valdivieso, Jefe Supremo, 12 de junio 1834 al 18 enero 1835 Sierra. Juan Bernardo León es el tercer 1835 -­­ 1839 Vicente Rocafuerte como Jefe 8 de agosto 1835 al 31 enero de 1839 Vicepresidente Supremo Juan José Flores como Presidente de 1 de febrero de 1839 al 15 de enero de 1843 la República Francisco Aguirre es el cuarto 1839 -­­ 1843 Juan José Flores elegido Presidente 1 de abril de 1843 al 6 de marzo de 1845 Vicepresidente por golpe de Estado Gobierno provisorio de José Joaquín de Olmedo, Vicente Ramón Roca, 6 de marzo al 8 de diciembre de 1845 Diego Novoa. Gobierno provisorio de José Joaquín Dr. Francisco Marcos 1843 -­­ 1845 de Olmedo, Vicente Ramón Roca, 1 de Abril de 1943 an 1 de Abril de 1945 Diego Novoa. Pablo Merino, es reemplazado en Mayo Vicente Ramón Roca Rodríguez asume 1847 por Manuel de Azcásubi y Matheu 1845 -­­ 1847 8 de diciembre de 1845 al 15 de octubre de 1849 como sexto Vicepresidente. el poder como Presidente de la El República Vicepresidente Manuel de Ascásubi y
    [Show full text]
  • Vicepresidentes De La República Del Ecuador
    VICEPRESIDENTES DE LA REPÚBLICA DEL ECUADOR PERÍODO VICEPRESIDENTE PRESIDENTE PERIODO PRESIDENCIAL OBSERVACIONES VICEPRESIDENCIAL Vicepresidente designado el 11 de Diciembre 11, 2018 - En el cargo diciembre de 2018 por la Asamblea Nacional con 94 votos a favor. Otto Sonnenholzner Lenín Voltaire Moreno Garcés Mayo 24, 2017 - En el cargo Vicepresidenta encargada desde el 04 de octubre del 2017 y designada Octubre 4, 2017 - Diciembre 4, 2018 el 06 de enero del 2018 Vicepresidenta de la República por la Asamblea Nacional, luego de la destitución de Jorge Glas. Renunció el 04 de diciembre de 2018 María Alejandra Vicuña Muñoz Mayo 24, 2017 - Enero 02, 2018 Sandra Naranjo fue Vicepresidenta encargada entre el 04 de enero y el 20 de Mayo 24, 2013 - Mayo 24, 2017 febrero del 2017 y entre el 13 y 30 de marzo del 2017. Jorge David Glas Espinel Rafael Vicente Correa Delgado Enero 15, 2007 - Mayo 24, 2017 Enero 15, 2007 - Mayo 24, 2013 Lenín Voltaire Moreno Garcés Mayo 05, 2005 - Enero 15, 2007 Luis Alfredo Palacios González Abril 20, 2005 - Enero 15, 2007 Nicanor Alejandro Serrano Aguilar Enero 15, 2003 - Abril 20, 2005 Lucio Edwin Gutiérrez Borbúa Enero 15, 2003 - Abril 20, 2005 Luis Alfredo Palacios González Enero 22, 2000 - Enero 15, 2003 Gustavo José Joaquín Noboa Bejarano Enero 22, 2000 - Enero 15, 20003 Pedro Alfredo Pinto Rubianes Agosto 10, 1998 - Enero 21, 2000 Jorge Jamil Mahuad Witt Agosto 10, 1998 - Enero 21, 2000 Gustavo José Joaquín Noboa Bejarano Abril 01, 1998 - Agosto 10, 1998 Pedro Aguayo Cubillo Fabián Ernesto Alarcón Rivera Febrero
    [Show full text]
  • Simón Bolívar
    Reading Comprehension/Biography SIMÓN BOLÍVAR Simón José Antonio de la Santísima Trinidad Bolívar y Palacios, (July 24, 1783 – December 17, 1830), more commonly known as Símon Bolívar, was one of the most important leaders of Spanish America's successful struggle for independence from Spain. He is a very important figure in South American political history, and served as President of Gran Colombia from 1821 to 1830, President of Peru from 1824 to 1826, and President of Bolivia from 1825 to 1826. Bolívar was born into a wealthy family in Caracas, in what is now Venezuela. Much of his family’s wealth came from silver, gold and copper mines. Later in his revolutionary life, Bolívar used part of the mineral income to finance the South American revolutionary wars. After the death of his parents, he went to Spain in 1799 to complete his education. He married there in 1802, but his wife died of yellow fever on a short return visit to Venezuela in 1803. Bolívar returned to Europe in 1804 and for a time was part of Napoleon's retinue. Bolívar returned to Venezuela in 1807, and, when Napoleon made Joseph Bonaparte King of Spain and its colonies in 1808, he participated in the resistance juntas in South America. The Caracas junta declared its independence in 1810, and Bolívar was sent to Britain on a diplomatic mission. Bolívar returned to Venezuela in 1811. In March 1812, he left Venezuela after an earthquake destroyed Caracas. In July 1812, junta leader Francisco de Miranda surrendered to the Spanish, and Bolívar had to flee.
    [Show full text]
  • Señor Generai Don Eloy Alfaro
    www.flacsoandes.edu.ec JEFATUI2A. ST DFL SEÑOR GENERAI DON ELOY ALFARO QUITO Tip. de la Fseuela de Artes y Oficios 1S97 Biblioteca Nacional del Ecuador "Eugenio Espejo" DECRETOS EJECUTIVOS ----- ---------- 1 E LOY ALPARO, En uso do las facultades de que me lian investi­ do las actas populares de la mayoría do las Provin­ cias do la República, DECRE10 Art. lü Asumo ol ejercicio del Poder Ejecuti­ vo; Art. 2o Declaro vigente la Oarta Fundamen­ tal de 1878, en todo lo que no se oponga á la trans­ formación política iniciada en esta ciudad. Dado y firmado en Guayaquil, á lí) de Junio de 1895. Eloy yVlfiiro. 2 ELOY ALFAR O, Jefi“ Supremo tío la República, Debiendo organizar el Gabinete para la Admi­ nistración Pública, Biblioteca Nacional del Ecuador "Eugenio Espejo" — 4 — DECRETO• Art. Io N ombro para Ministros Secretarios de Estado: De lo Interior, Relaciones Exteriores, Policía, Justicia, Instrucción Pública, Beneficencia y Nego­ cios Eclesiásticos, al Sr. Don Luis Eelipe Garbo; De Hacienda, Crédito y Obras Públicas, al Sr. Don Lizardo García: De Guerra y Marina, al Sr. General Don Cor- nelio E. Vernaza; Art. 2° Nombro para Sub-secretario de Estado de Relaciones Exteriores y Justicia, al Dr. José Luis Tamayo; De lo Interior y Policía, al Sr. Don José de Lapierre; De Instrucción Pública, Beneficencia y Nego­ cios Eclesiásticos, al Sr. Dr. Don Aurelio Noboa. De Hacienda, al Sr. Don Serafín S. Witlier S.; De Crédito y Obras Públicas, al Sr. Don Mi­ guel Angel Carbo; De Guerra y Marina, al Coronel Don Wilfrido Yenegas. Dado y firmado en Guayaquil, á 19 de Junio de 1895.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership Development in the Ecuadorian Military: Conversations with Members of Elite Units Dennis, Sandra
    www.ssoar.info Leadership Development in the Ecuadorian Military: Conversations with Members of Elite Units Dennis, Sandra Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Dennis, S. (2018). Leadership Development in the Ecuadorian Military: Conversations with Members of Elite Units. Pakistan Administrative Review, 2(3), 291-306. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-60199-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Pakistan Administrative Review Vol. 2, No. 3, 2018 Leadership Development in the Ecuadorian Military: Conversations with Members of Elite Units Sandra Dennis BMR (PT), MAGL Royal Roads University, British Columbia, Canada. [email protected] Abstract: Militaries around the world are studying leadership and consider that leadership training is giving them an advantage both on and off the battlefield. As the first ever research into leadership within the Ecuadorian military, the intent of the present study was to have military personnel explore their personal leadership and discuss individual and institutional ways to increase capacity. Empirical data was collected from men in the Anti-terrorism Special Forces and Intelligence Units of the Ecuadorian Army and from the Peacekeeping School which has military personnel from all three arms of the military, army, navy and air force. In addition, action research in the form of an Interview Matrix Activity and World Café were conducted with the Anti-terrorism Special Forces Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CONQUEST of the INCAS Grade Levels: 8-13+ 30 Minutes AMBROSE VIDEO PUBLISHING 1995
    #3593 THE CONQUEST OF THE INCAS Grade Levels: 8-13+ 30 minutes AMBROSE VIDEO PUBLISHING 1995 DESCRIPTION In 1532, Francisco Pizarro and a band of 170 conquistadors, searching for gold, embarked on the conquest of the Incan empire. Though badly outnumbered, they kidnapped Atahualpa, the god-king, and held him captive for nine months before murdering him. Reenactments and graphics help describe Incan civilization and its destruction. ACADEMIC STANDARDS Subject Area: World History ¨ Standard: Understands major global trends from 1000 to 1500 CE · Benchmark: Understands differences and similarities between the Inca and Aztec empires and empires of Afro-Eurasia (e.g., political institutions, warfare, social organizations, cultural achievements) ¨ Standard: Understands how the transoceanic interlinking of all major regions of the world between 1450 and 1600 led to global transformations · Benchmark: Understands features of Spanish exploration and conquest (e.g., why the Spanish wanted to invade the Incan and Aztec empires, and why these empires collapsed after the conflict with the Spanish; interaction between the Spanish and indigenous populations such as the Inca and the Aztec; different perspectives on Cortes' journey into Mexico) · Benchmark: Understands cultural interaction between various societies in the late 15th and 16th centuries (e.g., how the Church helped administer Spanish and Portuguese colonies in the Americas; reasons for the fall of the Incan empire to Pizarro; how the Portuguese dominated seaborne trade in the Indian Ocean basin in the 16th century; the relations between pilgrims and indigenous populations in North and South America, and the role different religious sects played in these relations; how the presence of Spanish conquerors affected the daily lives of Aztec, Maya, and Inca peoples) INSTRUCTIONAL GOALS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • La Desigual Conducta De Las Provincias Neogranadinas En El Proceso De La Independencia Anuario De Historia Regional Y De Las Fronteras, Vol
    Anuario de Historia Regional y de las Fronteras ISSN: 0122-2066 [email protected] Universidad Industrial de Santander Colombia Martínez Garnica, Armando La desigual conducta de las provincias neogranadinas en el proceso de la Independencia Anuario de Historia Regional y de las Fronteras, vol. 14, núm. 1, octubre, 2009, pp. 37-54 Universidad Industrial de Santander Bucaramanga, Colombia Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=407539688002 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Anuario de Historia Regional y de las Fronteras, Volumen 14, Octubre 2009 La desigual conducta de las provincias neogranadinas en el proceso de la Independencia Armando Martínez Garnica* Universidad Industrial de Santander Resumen Un neogranadino recordó a los lectores del Correo del Orinoco (entrega 61, 1820) que de las 22 provincias que en 1810 integraban la jurisdicción del Virreinato de la Nueva Granada (incluidas las tres de la Audiencia de Quito), solamente once habían integrado el Congreso de las Provincias Unidas de la Nueva Granada durante su corta existencia: Cartagena, Popayán, Antioquia, Chocó, Tunja, Neiva y Pamplona, que fueron las constituyentes; Socorro, que se integró en cuanto se separó del dominio de Cundinamarca; y las que se integraron por la fuerza de las armas: Santa Fe, Mariquita y Los Llanos, cuando las tropas del Congreso encabezadas por un coronel caraqueño entraron a la capital. Esto significa que, pese a la reunión de Cundinamarca y el Congreso, la mitad de las provincias se convirtieron en fortines del Consejo de Regencia e incluso una de ellas, Panamá, en la nueva sede del virrey y de la Real Audiencia.
    [Show full text]
  • La Desigual Conducta De Las Provincias Neogranadinas En El Proceso De La Independencia
    Anuario de Historia Regional y de las Fronteras, Volumen 14, Octubre 2009 La desigual conducta de las provincias neogranadinas en el proceso de la Independencia Armando Martínez Garnica* Universidad Industrial de Santander Resumen Un neogranadino recordó a los lectores del Correo del Orinoco (entrega 61, 1820) que de las 22 provincias que en 1810 integraban la jurisdicción del Virreinato de la Nueva Granada (incluidas las tres de la Audiencia de Quito), solamente once habían integrado el Congreso de las Provincias Unidas de la Nueva Granada durante su corta existencia: Cartagena, Popayán, Antioquia, Chocó, Tunja, Neiva y Pamplona, que fueron las constituyentes; Socorro, que se integró en cuanto se separó del dominio de Cundinamarca; y las que se integraron por la fuerza de las armas: Santa Fe, Mariquita y Los Llanos, cuando las tropas del Congreso encabezadas por un coronel caraqueño entraron a la capital. Esto significa que, pese a la reunión de Cundinamarca y el Congreso, la mitad de las provincias se convirtieron en fortines del Consejo de Regencia e incluso una de ellas, Panamá, en la nueva sede del virrey y de la Real Audiencia. Es por ello que este escrito presenta un cuadro general de la desigual conducta de las 19 provincias de la Real Audiencia de Santa Fe durante el momento de la crisis de la Monarquía de las Españas, intentando llamar la atención sobre el hecho de que la conducta de la provincia de Santa Fe no fue el único paradigma de lo que aconteció en el Nuevo Reino de Granada. Palabras claves: Eclosión, Junta, Independencia, Provincias.
    [Show full text]
  • Tradiciones Históricas En La Formación Del Estado Ecuatoriano Y Sus
    Encuentro Latinoamericano | ISSN 2414-6625 Vol. 3 No.2 (December 2016) Tradiciones históricas en la formación del Estado ecuatoriano y sus incidencias en el fortalecimiento y modernización estatal del Presidente Correa “Todos los cambios, aun los más radicales, siguen grandes líneas de continuidad histórica” https://doi.org/10.22151/ELA.3.2.1 Julio Enrique Paltán López Máster en Políticas Públicas - FLACSO Ecuador [email protected] Resumen Buscando aportar a los estudios de historia comparada y enriquecer a los análisis políticos hechos a la luz de la historia, este estudio se pregunta cuáles son las cuatro tradiciones presentes en la historia política del Ecuador que con mayor notoriedad han incidido y confluyen en el actual proceso de fortalecimiento del Estado emprendido por el actual presidente ecuatoriano Rafael Correa. Estas cuatro tradiciones constituyen parte de importantes momentos constitutivos del Estado ecuatoriano y son: la modernización católica centralista autoritaria, la liberal del ex presidente Eloy Alfaro, la tradición nacional-popular caudillista y el desarrollismo estatista anti oligárquico. Aplicando el enfoque institucionalista histórico se recopila las características y hechos de esas tradiciones y se analiza como la mayoría de ellas inciden en la reconstitución y modernización del Estado emprendida por el presidente del Ecuador Correa. Abstract This article aims to contribute to studies of comparative history, and enrich political analysis by applying a historical perspective. It asks what are the traditions present in the political history of Ecuador that have most significantly influenced the current process of strengthening of the State undertaken by the Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa. The four traditions highlighted in the article are part of important constitutive moments of Ecuadorian State: authoritarian centralist Catholic modernization, liberal former President Eloy Alfaro, the national-popular caudillo tradition and the anti-oligarchic statist developmentalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Dictaduras En América Latina Y Su Influencia En Los Movimientos De
    Revista Ratio Juris Vol. 16 N.º 32, 2021, pp. 17-50 © UNAULA EDITORIAL DICTATORSHIPS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THEIR INFLUENCE OF RIGHT AND LEFT MOVEMENTS SINCE THE 20TH CENTURY* LAS DICTADURAS EN AMÉRICA LATINA Y SU INFLUENCIA EN LOS MOVIMIENTOS DE DERECHA E IZQUIERDA DESDE EL SIGLO xx Juan Carlos Beltrán López José Fernando Valencia Grajales** Mayda Soraya Marín Galeano*** Recibido: 30 de noviembre de 2020 - Aceptado: 30 de mayo de 2021 - Publicado: 30 de junio de 2021 DOI: 10.24142/raju.v16n32a1 * El presente artículo es derivado de la línea Constitucionalismo Crítico y Género que hace parte del programa de investigación con código 2019 29-000029 de la línea denominada Dinámicas Urbano-Regionales, Economía Solidaria y Construcción de Paz Territorial en Antioquia, que a su vez tiene como sublíneas de trabajo las siguientes: Construcción del Sujeto Político, Ciudadanía y Transformación Social; Constitucionalismo Crítico y Género; Globalización, Derechos Humanos y Políticas Públicas, y Conflicto Territorio y Paz e Investigación Formativa. ** Docente investigador Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana (UNAULA); Abogado, Universidad de Antioquia; Politólogo, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín; Especialista en Cultu- ra Política: Pedagogía de los Derechos Humanos, Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana (UNAU- LA); Magíster en Estudios Urbano Regionales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín; estudiante del Doctorado en Conocimiento y Cultura en América Latina, Instituto Pensamiento y Cultura en América Latina, A. C.; editor de la revista Kavilando y Revista Ratio Juris (UNAULA), Medellín, Colombia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8128-4903; Google Scholar: https://scho- lar.google.es/citations?user=mlzFu8sAAAAJ&hl=es. Correo electrónico: [email protected] *** Directora de la Maestría en Derecho y docente investigadora de la Universidad Católica Luis Amigó, investigadora de la revista Kavilando.
    [Show full text]
  • A Key Ingredient for Successful Peacekeeping Operations Management by Joseph L
    No. 04-6W Landpower Essay October 2004 An Institute of Land Warfare Publication Special Operators: A Key Ingredient for Successful Peacekeeping Operations Management by Joseph L. Homza Low-intensity operations cannot be won or contained by military power alone. They require the application of all elements of national power across the entire range of conditions which are the source of the conflict.1 U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, Special Forces Peacekeeping is not a job for soldiers, but only a soldier can do it.2 Former United Nations Secretary-General Dag Hammerskold Multinational and regional alliances, as well as the Charter of the United Nations, include “terms that reflect a determination to provide an international institution that could control conflict” in the Low-Intensity Conflict (LIC) spectrum of war.3 As a defense contractor employed by Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, I recently had a unique opportunity to participate directly in the Military Observer Mission Ecuador and Peru (MOMEP), an LIC reduction operation conducted by conventional military forces with management influence by Special Operations Forces (SOF). The tenets of campaign analysis—e.g., military historical perspectives, force structure, command and control capabilities and military objectives—provide a paradigm to demonstrate clearly the effectiveness of this conflict management mission performed by SOF in accordance with the ten focus areas stipulated by John M. Collins in Special Operations Forces: An Assessment.4 The MOMEP Confidence Building Measure (CBM) was an example of SOF and conventional military force elements at their operational best. The Organization of American States (OAS), due to the actions of the SOF and conventional units assigned to MOMEP, would experience a successful CBM Peacekeeping Operation (PKO) in a regional context.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colombia-Ecuador Crisis of 2008
    WAR WITHOUT BORDERS: THE COLOMBIA-ECUADOR CRISIS OF 2008 Gabriel Marcella December 2008 Visit our website for other free publication downloads http://www.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army.mil/ To rate this publication click here. This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, it may not be copyrighted. ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave, Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. ***** All Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) publications are available on the SSI homepage for electronic dissemination. Hard copies of this report also may be ordered from our homepage. SSI’s homepage address is: www.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army.mil. ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please subscribe on our homepage at www.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army. mil/newsletter/. ISBN 1-58487-372-8 ii FOREWORD Unprotected borders are a serious threat to the security of a number of states around the globe.
    [Show full text]