View in PDF Format Also

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

View in PDF Format Also Sharing The Presidents’ Messages On September 11, 2013, exactly twelve years after the calamitous events of 9/11, 2001, which changed world politics forever, President Obama of the USA addressed the nation about the problems caused by the use of chemical weapons in the Syrian conflict. At the end of his speech, he asked the recipients of his message to share it with others, “to make sure they know where I stand, and how they can stay up to date on this situation.” Well, we are only too happy to put ourselves to the President’s service and share his message with our readers. Few other publications reach as many people in as many nations as The Christian Herald. These are momentous times in the history of this unhappy world. World commentators try to make sense of world developments from a human perspective; we look at them from a spiritual perspective, making sense not only in what they mean in the short term, but where they take the world in terms of biblical prophecies. Our record over the two decades, since we’ve been doing this work, is unequalled by any publication. It took us that long to make an impact on the world, but now the momentum take us forward in ways that a few years ago we could only dream of. The sad thing is that the world is not going in the direction wanted by our heavenly Father. He wants to save all human beings, but unfortunately not all humans want to be saved. Mat 18:11 For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost. Mat 18:12 "What do you think? If a man has a hundred sheep, and one of them goes astray, does he not leave the ninety-nine and go to the mountains to seek the one that is straying? Mat 18:13 And if he should find it, assuredly, I say to you, he rejoices more over that sheep than over the ninety-nine that did not go astray. Mat 18:14 Even so it is not the will of your Father who is in heaven that one of these little ones should perish. With every passing day, the world inches closer to a catastrophe from which few people will survive. The conflict in the Middle East is merely a stage in that direction. It is in this light that one must view the following statements from President Obama and President Putin of Russia. Good evening -- I just addressed the nation about the use of chemical weapons in Syria. Over the past two years, what began as a series of peaceful protests against the repressive regime of Bashar al-Assad has turned into a brutal civil war in Syria. Over 100,000 people have been killed. In that time, we have worked with friends and allies to provide humanitarian support for the Syrian people, to help the moderate opposition within Syria, and to shape a political settlement. But we have resisted calls for military action because we cannot resolve someone else's civil war through force. The situation profoundly changed in the early hours of August 21, when more than 1,000 Syrians – including hundreds of children – were killed by chemical weapons launched by the Assad government. What happened to those people – to those children – is not only a violation of international law – it's also a danger to our security. Here's why: If we fail to act, the Assad regime will see no reason to stop using chemical weapons. As the ban against these deadly weapons erodes, other tyrants and authoritarian regimes will have no reason to think The Christian Herald No 29 Page 1 twice about acquiring poison gases and using them. Over time, our troops could face the prospect of chemical warfare on the battlefield. It could be easier for terrorist organizations to obtain these weapons and use them to attack civilians. If fighting spills beyond Syria's borders, these weapons could threaten our allies in the region. So after careful deliberation, I determined that it is in the national security interests of the United States to respond to the Assad regime's use of chemical weapons through a targeted military strike. The purpose of this strike would be to deter Assad from using chemical weapons, to degrade his regime's ability to use them, and make clear to the world that we will not tolerate their use. Though I possess the authority to order these strikes, in the absence of a direct threat to our security I believe that Congress should consider my decision to act. Our democracy is stronger when the President acts with the support of Congress – and when Americans stand together as one people. Over the last few days, as this debate unfolds, we've already begun to see signs that the credible threat of U.S. military action may produce a diplomatic breakthrough. The Russian government has indicated a willingness to join with the international community in pushing Assad to give up his chemical weapons and the Assad regime has now admitted that it has these weapons, and even said they'd join the Chemical Weapons Convention, which prohibits their use. It's too early to tell whether this offer will succeed, and any agreement must verify that the Assad regime keeps its commitments. But this initiative has the potential to remove the threat of chemical weapons without the use of force. That's why I've asked the leaders of Congress to postpone a vote to authorize the use of force while we pursue this diplomatic path. I'm sending Secretary of State John Kerry to meet his Russian counterpart on Thursday, and I will continue my own discussions with President Putin. At the same time, we'll work with two of our closest allies – France and the United Kingdom – to put forward a resolution at the U.N. Security Council requiring Assad to give up his chemical weapons, and to ultimately destroy them under international control. Meanwhile, I've ordered our military to maintain their current posture to keep the pressure on Assad, and to be in a position to respond if diplomacy fails. And tonight, I give thanks again to our military and their families for their incredible strength and sacrifices. As we continue this debate – in Washington, and across the country – I need your help to make sure that everyone understands the factors at play. Please share this message with others to make sure they know where I stand, and how they can stay up to date on this situation. Anyone can find the latest information about the situation in Syria, including video of tonight's address, here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/foreign-policy/syria Thank you, President Barack Obama President Obama acknowledged the diplomatic role played by Russia’s President Putin in his decision to postpone his planed strike against Syria. A couple of days earlier, world media outlets sung odes to President Putin for his efforts to solve the Syrian crisis diplomatically. He won plaudits for convincing President Assad of Syria to give up his stockpile of chemical weapons. President Putin, however, seems to have a different agenda, and seeing a weakness in America’ position, he showed the world a different face just a couple of days later. Putin to Offer Iran S-300s, Another Reactor Emboldened by US weakness? Russian president to make the offer at a meeting with Iranian President Hassan. Russian President Vladimir Putin will offer to supply Iran with S-300 air defense missile systems, and to build a second reactor at the Bushehr nuclear plant, Russia's Kommersant business daily reported Wednesday. Citing a source close to the Kremlin, the publication reported that Putin will renew an offer to supply Iran with five S-300 ground-to-air missile systems when he meets Iranian President Hassan Rowhani on Friday, at a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization that is to be held in Kyrgyzstan. Russia signed a contract in 2007 to supply Iran with five S-300 advanced missile batteries, which can be used against aircraft or guided missiles, at a cost of $800 million. In 2010, Russia's then-president Dmitry Medvedev cancelled the deal, after the US and Israel applied strong pressure on him. The US and Israel worry that the S-300 would make Iran less vulnerable to attack by either one of them, and motivate Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. The source told Kommersant that The Christian Herald No 29 Page 2 Russia's offer was conditional on Iran's withdrawing a $4 billion lawsuit that it has filed at an international court in Geneva against Russia's arms export agency, for balking on the original S-300 deal. Kommersant wrote that Putin would offer to Iran a modified export version of the S-300 systems called S-300VM Antey-2500. The source also said that Putin was ready to sign a deal with Iran on building a second reactor for the Bushehr nuclear plant, adding that the deal was not "particularly profitable from an economic point of view, but was rather political." The reports of the impending deal with Iran, if true, appear to jibe with recent analyses that said that Putin has been emboldened by US President Barack Obama's weak and vacillating policies regarding the Middle East. (Rowhani, IsraelNationalNews.com, Sept. 11, 2013) Isn’t this remarkable? Without wasting too much time, “emboldened by President Obama's weak and vacillating policies regarding the Middle East”, President Putin showed the world that his interests do not quite match those of the western powers.
Recommended publications
  • Record of the Istanbul Process 16/18 for Combating Intolerance And
    2019 JAPAN SUMMARY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS EVENT SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 PLENARY SESSIONS ................................................................................................................................. 7 LAUNCHING THE 2019 G20 INTERFAITH FORUM.......................................................................... 7 FORMAL FORUM INAUGURATION – WORKING FOR PEACE, PEOPLE, AND PLANET: CHALLENGES TO THE G20 ............................................................................................................... 14 WHY WE CAN HOPE: PEACE, PEOPLE, AND PLANET ................................................................. 14 ACTION AGENDAS: TESTING IDEAS WITH EXPERIENCE FROM FIELD REALITIES ........... 15 IDEAS TO ACTION .............................................................................................................................. 26 TOWARDS 2020 .................................................................................................................................... 35 CLOSING PLENARY ............................................................................................................................ 42 PEACE WORKING SESSIONS ................................................................................................................ 53 FROM VILE TO VIOLENCE: FREEDOM OF RELIGION & BELIEF & PEACEBUILDING ......... 53 THE DIPLOMACY OF RELIGIOUS PEACEBUILDING ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Death Penalty in Japan: the Law of Silence Going Against the International Trend
    The Death Penalty in Japan: The Law of Silence Going against the International Trend International fact-finding mission Article 1 : All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 2 : Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. n°505a October 2008 Tokyo Detention Centre FIDH - The Death Penalty in Japan: The Law of Silence / 2 Contents Introduction 4 I. The Japanese Context 6 Context and history of the application of the death penalty in Japan Actors Authorities Officials at Ministry of Justice Detention Centre Personnel Political Parties Civil society Lawyers victims’ families and detainees’ families NGOs and the movements in favour of abolition Religious representatives The influence of media II. Current debates 18 Secrecy Separation of powers Life imprisonment without parole and a toughening of penalties Fallacious arguments Justification by public opinion The confusion between the rights of victims and the death penalty The cultural argument III. Legal Framework 25 Domestic law and norms International law United Nations Japan ratified the United Nations Convention Against Torture in 1999 The Council of Europe The European Union The International criminal court (ICC) IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan 2019 Human Rights Report
    JAPAN 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Japan has a parliamentary government with a constitutional monarchy. Shinzo Abe, leader of the Liberal Democratic Party, became prime minister in 2012. Upper house elections in July, which Prime Minister Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party and its coalition partner, the Komeito Party, won with a solid majority, were considered free and fair. The National Public Safety Commission, a cabinet-level entity, oversees the National Police Agency (NPA), and prefectural public safety commissions have responsibility for local police forces. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. There were concerns that some laws and practices, if misused, could infringe on freedom of the press. The government enforced laws prohibiting human rights abuses and prosecuted officials who committed them. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary Deprivation of Life and Other Unlawful or Politically Motivated Killings There were no reports that the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings. b. Disappearance There were no reports of disappearances by or on behalf of government authorities. c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment The law prohibits such practices, and there were no reports that government officials employed them. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED JAPAN 2 The government continued to deny death row inmates advance information about the date of execution and notified family members of executions after the fact. The government held that this policy spared prisoners the anguish of knowing when they were going to die. Authorities also regularly hold prisoners condemned to death in solitary confinement until their execution but allowed visits by family, lawyers, and others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abduction of Japanese People by North Korea And
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Ritsumeikan Research Repository THE ABDUCTION OF JAPANESE PEOPLE BY NORTH KOREA AND THE DYNAMICS OF JAPANESE DOMESTIC POLITICS AND FOREIGN POLICY: CASE STUDIES OF SHIN KANEMARU AND JUNICHIRO KOIZUMI’S PYONGYANG SUMMIT MEETINGS IN 1990, 2002 AND 2004’S PYONGYANG SUMMIT MEETINGS by PARK Seohee 51114605 March 2017 Master’s Thesis / Independent Final Report Presented to Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Asia Pacific Studies ACKNOLEGEMENTS First and foremost, I praise and thank my Lord, who gives me the opportunity and talent to accomplish this research. You gave me the power to trust in my passion and pursue my dreams. I could never have done this without the faith I have in You, the Almighty. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Yoichiro Sato for your excellent support and guidance. You gave me the will to carry on and never give up in any hardship. Under your great supervision, this work came into existence. Again, I am so grateful for your trust, informative advice, and encouragement. I am deeply thankful and honored to my loving family. My two Mr. Parks and Mrs. Keum for your support, love and trust. Every moment of every day, I thank our Lord Almighty for giving me such a wonderful family. I would like to express my gratitude to Rotary Yoneyama Memorial Foundation, particularly to Mrs. Toshiko Takahashi (and her family), Kunisaki Club, Mr. Minoru Akiyoshi and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Alzheimer's Society Annual Conference, Tuesday 22 May 2018
    Alzheimer's Society Annual Conference, Tuesday 22 May 2018 Taking action on dementia Time Title Speaker 9am Registration, exhibition, posters and refreshments 9.45am Welcome and housekeeping Fiona Phillips – Journalist and Broadcaster, Alzheimer’s Society Ambassador 10am Introduction to ASAC 2018 Jeremy Hughes CBE, CEO Alzheimer’s Society 10.15am The Dementia Statements one year on – rights and the Three Nations Dementia Working group Members of the Three Nations We know that the rights of people affected by dementia in many areas across healthcare and wider Dementia Working group society are not being upheld. One year on from the publication of the new Dementia Statements, this session explores how talking about rights is fundamental for achieving necessary change for people affected by dementia. Professor Sir Simon Lovestone, 11.00am Dementia – Big problem; Big Data – Big solution? Professor of Translational 1 ASAC 2018 – last programme update 19.04.18 Globally researchers are coming together to take on dementia, pooling their data and using the power of Neuroscience, University of big data sets to address key unanswered questions. Professor Sir Lovestone will give an overview of Oxford what is big data and where does the data come from. He will look at how data is continually being reused to advance research and improve care, through examples of using medical records in research; ethics and governance. 11.30am Refreshments, exhibition, posters and networking 11.50am Parallel Sessions Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4 UKDRI: conquering dementia Younger people with dementia Getting emergency care right Caring for carers through research Chaired by Adrian Ivinson, Chief Chaired by Tessa Gutteridge, Chaired by Sean Bone-Knell, Chaired by Bob Kahn and Peter Operating Officer, UK Dementia CEO, Young Dementia UK Director of Operations, Kent Fire Riley, Carers and members of Research Institute and Rescue Service Alzheimer’s Society Research Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Alzheimer's Society Annual Conference, Tuesday 22 May 2018
    Alzheimer's Society Annual Conference, Tuesday 22 May 2018 Taking action on dementia Time Title Speaker 9am Registration, exhibition, posters and refreshments 9.45am Welcome and housekeeping Fiona Phillips – Journalist and Broadcaster, Alzheimer’s Society Ambassador 10am Introduction to ASAC 2018 Kathryn Smith, Chief Operating Officer, Alzheimer’s Society 10.15am The Dementia Statements one year on – rights and the Three Nations Dementia Working group Members of the Three Nations Dementia Working group We know that the rights of people affected by dementia in many areas across healthcare and wider society are not being upheld. One year on from the publication of the new Dementia Statements, this session explores how talking about rights is fundamental for achieving necessary change for people affected by dementia. 1 ASAC 2018 – last programme update 187.05.18 Professor Sir Simon Lovestone, 11.00am Dementia – Big problem; Big Data – Big solution? Professor of Translational Globally researchers are coming together to take on dementia, pooling their data and using the power of Neuroscience, University of big data sets to address key unanswered questions. Professor Sir Lovestone will give an overview of Oxford what is big data and where does the data come from. He will look at how data is continually being reused to advance research and improve care, through examples of using medical records in research; ethics and governance. 11.30am Refreshments, exhibition, posters and networking 11.50am Parallel Sessions Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4 UKDRI: conquering dementia Younger people with dementia Getting emergency care right Caring for carers through research Chaired by Professor Chris Chaired by Tessa Gutteridge, Chaired by Sean Bone-Knell, Chaired by Bob Kahn and Peter Shaw, Associate Director,UK CEO, Young Dementia UK Director of Operations, Kent Fire Riley, Carers and members of Dementia Research Institute and Rescue Service Alzheimer’s Society Research Network.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Full Participation of Laity in the Mission of the Church
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 8 Original Research The challenges of full participation of laity in the mission of the church Author: The church shares in Christ’s mission of bringing all to the knowledge of God and to salvation. 1,2 Mary J. Obiorah All its members are called to this intrinsic mission bequeathed to the entire church. The lay Affiliation: faithful form the greatest number of the members and their functions are important in this 1Department of Religion and mission. However, they are beset by numerous setbacks that constitute untold challenges Cultural Studies, Faculty of for the church. This article, written from a sub-Saharan African and Catholic background, Social Sciences, University of examines the nature of this mission as a requisite prelude to discussion on various challenges Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria experienced by the laity in participating fully in the mission. It also recommends ways of 2Department of New enhancing their contributions. Testament Studies, Faculty of Theology and Religion, Contribution: The primary contribution of this article is its specific focus on the challenges the University of Pretoria, laity encounter in carrying out their mission in the world. It is a theological study based on Pretoria, South Africa scriptural foundations of the laity in the church. As members, laypersons share fully in the church’s received mission mandate. Research Project Registration: Project Leader: E. van Eck Keywords: Laity; Mission; Christians; Munera Christi; Challenges. Project Number: 2400030 Description: Mary J. Obiorah is Introduction participating in the research project ‘Socio-cultural Reflections, strategic plans and their executions, positive attitude towards the laity and their Readings’, directed by involvement in the mission of the church are some impacts of Apostolicam Actuositatem and Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Politics of Legacy
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Succeeding in politics : dynasties in democracies Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1dv7f7bb Authors Smith, Daniel Markham Smith, Daniel Markham Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Succeeding in Politics: Dynasties in Democracies A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Daniel Markham Smith Committee in charge: Professor Kaare Strøm, Chair Professor Gary W. Cox Professor Gary C. Jacobson Professor Ellis S. Krauss Professor Krislert Samphantharak Professor Matthew S. Shugart 2012 ! Daniel Markham Smith, 2012 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Daniel Markham Smith is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2012 iii DEDICATION To my mother and father, from whom I have inherited so much. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature page……………………………………………………………………………iii Dedication………………………………………………………………………………...iv Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………….v List of Abbreviations………………………….………………………………………....vii List of Figures……………………………...……………………………………………viii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………...x Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………….xii Vita………………………………………………………………………………………xv Abstract………………………………………………………………………………….xvi 1. The
    [Show full text]
  • Report from the Ministerial Summit on Dementia Research
    Report from the Ministerial Summit on Dementia Research Organised by the Department of Health (England) and the Medical Research Council Produced by the International Longevity Centre UK November 2009 1 MINISTERIAL FOREWORD The Research Summit was an important milestone in UK dementia research. I am pleased that it was attended by so many experts, including researchers, service providers and - importantly - people living with dementia and their carers. Their views have been distilled into this Report and will make a vital contribution to shaping the future of dementia research. The discussions held at the Summit have helped to identify the priority areas for future research and some of the main challenges faced. Central amongst these is the need to improve public awareness of, and support for, dementia research in order to increase participation in research studies and encourage brain donation. Further ways of improving the dissemination of research and the ‘translation’ of its findings into improved treatment and care must also be sought. It is necessary to increase awareness of the existence of resources available to dementia researchers, via funding and support for work in the field. We also need to find ways to increase collaboration, between disciplines and funders, and with the commercial sector. Continued work on ‘busting bureaucracy’ within governance and regulatory processes will help quicken the pace of high quality research activity. To ensure that swift and tangible progress is made on the main issues identified by the Summit, we will establish a new Ministerial Group on Dementia Research, which I will chair. The Group will bring together those parties with a stake in dementia research to ensure momentum for action from the Dementia Summit is maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Joint Conference of the National Popular Culture and American Culture Associations
    2010 Joint Conference of the National Popular Culture and American Culture Associations March 31 – April 3, 2010 Rennaisance Grand Hotel St. Louis Delores F. Rauscher, Editor & PCA/ACA Conference Coordinator Jennifer DeFore, Editor & Assistant Coordinator Michigan State University Elna Lim, Wiley-Blackwell Editor Additional information about the PCA/ACA available at www.pcaaca.org 2 Table of Contents The 2009 National Conference Popular Culture Association & American Culture Association Area Chairs ___________________ 5 PCA/ACA Board Members _______________________________ 13 Officers _______________________________________________ 13 Executive Officers ______________________________________ 13 Past & Future Conferences _______________________________ 14 Conference Papers for Sale; Benefits Endowment _____________ 15 Exhibit Hours __________________________________________ 15 Business & Board Meetings _______________________________ 16 Film Screenings ________________________________________ 18 Dinners, Get-Togethers, Receptions, & Tours ________________ 23 Roundtables ___________________________________________ 25 Special Sessions ______________________________________________ 29 Schedule Overview ______________________________________ 33 Saturday ____________________________________________________ 54 Daily Schedule _________________________________________ 77 Wednesday, 12:30 P.M. – 2:00 P.M. ____________________________ 77 Wednesday, 2:30 P.M. – 4:00 P.M. ____________________________ 83 Wednesday, 4:30 P.M. – 6:00 P.M. ____________________________
    [Show full text]
  • After May 10Th Where Now?
    Published by Organise!, 40 Bedford Street, Belfast, BT2 7FF strike action between 12pm and 2pm. Not all of the NIPSA members balloted th were able to get out on strike on the After May 10 day. Many workers in smaller, contracted out, departments, felt they were forced to go to work. NIPSA had not given their employers the legal minimum notice for strike action so workers were threatened that going Where Now? out would be illegal. It is being reported that another strike date has been set for June. In taking action we are showing that we won‟t sit back and see this capitalist „crisis‟ used as yet another excuse to rob us. It is not enough that we are robbed day in and day out as a result of capitalist exploitation - the bosses and their lackeys in government are tightening the screws while their profits soar and they spend billions on privatisation and war. Only the working class can defeat the „austerity‟ measures that are crushing us all, in both the public and private sector, in and out of work. We have the power together to grind their economy to a standstill - hitting the bosses and politicians in the pockets for a change. The most effective means of defeating this onslaught is through a general strike. Nothing less will succeed - to do it we need to organise all working class people, public and private sector, in the unions and outside them, employed and unemployed, women and men, students, and migrant workers. Striking workers say no to pensions Belfast and Derry.
    [Show full text]
  • Extraits Du Mémoire 2013-2014
    Association du GROUPE SAPEC Soutien aux personnes abusées dans une relation d'autorité religieuse Mémoire 2013 – 2014 Abus sexuels au sein de l’Église catholique en Suisse et dans le monde Extraits des éclairages sur les facteurs favorisant les abus dans l'Église catholique.doc "La pédophilie dans l'Église catholique n'est pas un accident de parcours, niun immense fait divers". Gabriel Ringlet, ancien Vice-Recteur de l’UCL, Belgique Reconnaissance Réparation Prévention Le mémoire peut être consulté et téléchargé sur www.groupe-sapec.net Actualisation Juin 2014 Association du Groupe SAPEC, Rte d’Echallens 37, CH – 1044 Fey +41 79 918 16 69 www.groupe-sapec.net [email protected] 2 Mémoire 2013 - 2014 Ce mémoire cherche à rendre accessibles les informations et réflexions que les membres de l’Association du Groupe SAPEC (soutien aux personnes abusées dans une relation d’autorité religieuse) ont rassemblées depuis trois ans et les propositions formulées afin d’obtenir la reconnaissance et la réparation indispensables aux victimes. Il n’a pas l’ambition de faire le tour du vaste problème des abus sexuels au sein de l’Église catholique. • La première partie évoque la vague de révélations concernant les abus sexuels par- tie des États-Unis vers l’Europe pour toucher finalement aussi le tiers monde. Elle résume la manière dont certains pays ont répondu aux demandes des victimes. Elle rappelle brièvement l’attitude et les réactions de l’Église catholique. Elle s'interroge sur les facteurs qui ont pu favoriser de si nombreux abus et qui inquiètent encore aujourd’hui des prêtres, des religieux, mais aussi les fidèles.
    [Show full text]