Conservation Areas Descriptions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conservation Areas Descriptions CANADIAN ROCKY MOUNTAINS ECOREGIONAL ASSESSMENT Volume Three: Conservation Areas Descriptions British Columbia Conservation Data Centre Citation: Rumsey, C., M. Wood, B. Butterfield, P. Comer, D. Hillary, M. Bryer, C. Carroll, G. Kittel, K.J. Torgerson, C. Jean, R. Mullen, P. Iachetti, and J. Lewis. 2003. Canadian Rocky Mountains Ecoregional Assessment, Volume Three: Conservation Areas Descriptions. Prepared for The Nature Conservancy and the Nature Conservancy of Canada. Cover page photo credits: Top, left to right: The Nature Conservancy of Canada’s Mount Broadwood Conservation Area (Dave Hillary); Water howellia (howellia aquatilis); Grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) (Dave Fraser); Northern Leopard Frog (rana pipiens), Columbia Valley Wildlife Management Area (Dave Hillary); Maligne Lake, Jasper National Park (Pierre Iachetti) Bottom, left to right: Mission Valley, Montana (Marilyn Wood); Palouse Prairie, Idaho (KJ Torgerson); Harlequin duck (histrionicus histrionicus) TABLE OF CONTENTS CONSERVATION AREA SUMMARIES......................................................................... 4 Adams River. ...................................................................................................................... 5 Bitterroot............................................................................................................................. 6 Bull Lake/East Cabinet. ...................................................................................................... 7 Camas Prairie...................................................................................................................... 9 Cougar Bay ....................................................................................................................... 11 Crown of the Continent..................................................................................................... 13 Cusick. .............................................................................................................................. 15 Dayton Creek /Hog Heaven.............................................................................................. 16 Dishman Hills/Mica Peak ................................................................................................. 17 East-West Connectivity North. ......................................................................................... 19 East-West Connectivity South. ......................................................................................... 21 Elk River Valley ............................................................................................................... 23 Flathead Lake and Wetlands............................................................................................. 25 Fraser River Headwaters................................................................................................... 27 Granby............................................................................................................................... 28 Kakwa - Willmore............................................................................................................. 29 Jocko River. ...................................................................................................................... 31 Kootenai River.................................................................................................................. 33 Kootenay River A (Libby Dam to Kootenay Lake).......................................................... 35 Kootenay River B. ............................................................................................................ 38 Kootenay River C. ............................................................................................................ 40 Lake Pend Oreille. ............................................................................................................ 41 Little Bitterroot River. ...................................................................................................... 43 Lower Coeur d’Alene. ...................................................................................................... 45 Lower Columbia A. .......................................................................................................... 47 Lower Columbia B............................................................................................................ 49 Lower Columbia C............................................................................................................ 50 Middle Columbia. ............................................................................................................. 52 Mission Valley.................................................................................................................. 54 Mountain Parks ................................................................................................................. 55 North Thompson River. .................................................................................................... 57 Orofino – Ford Creeks. ..................................................................................................... 58 Palouse Prairie .................................................................................................................. 60 Pend Oreille River............................................................................................................. 62 Pleasant Valley.................................................................................................................. 64 Purcell Mountains. ............................................................................................................ 66 Rocky Mountain Front...................................................................................................... 68 Rocky Mountain Trench A ............................................................................................... 69 Rocky Mountain Trench B................................................................................................ 71 Salmo-Priest-Selkirks ....................................................................................................... 73 Salmo River. ..................................................................................................................... 75 Scotchman Peak................................................................................................................ 77 Shuswap Highlands........................................................................................................... 78 Slocan River...................................................................................................................... 80 CANADIAN ROCKY MOUNTAINS ECOREGIONAL ASSESSMENT • VOLUME 3 • CONSERVATION AREAS 2 Spirit Lake......................................................................................................................... 82 St. Joe-Clearwater............................................................................................................. 84 Thompson- Lower Clark Fork (Idaho-Montana).............................................................. 87 Upper Coeur d’Alene........................................................................................................ 88 Weitas Creek..................................................................................................................... 90 Wells Gray/Bowron. ......................................................................................................... 91 Ahbou Lake....................................................................................................................... 93 Bitterroot Mountainsnail EO............................................................................................. 93 Bull Trout Spawning Area................................................................................................ 93 Burbot Spawning Area...................................................................................................... 93 Cyr Culch Bald Eagle Nest EO......................................................................................... 93 Fleabane/Salmon Driven................................................................................................... 93 Hixon Creek Headwaters. ................................................................................................. 93 Hunt Girl Creek................................................................................................................. 94 Landslide........................................................................................................................... 94 Least (Selkirk) Chipmunk................................................................................................. 94 Little NF CDA Trib. ......................................................................................................... 94 Mabel Lake. ...................................................................................................................... 94 Moffat Creek..................................................................................................................... 94 Moody Creek. ................................................................................................................... 95 Moyie River Headwaters. ................................................................................................. 95 Murphy Creek. .................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Physiography Geology
    BRITISH COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES HON. W. K. KIERNAN, Minister P. J. MULCAHY, Deputy Minister NOTES ON PHYSIOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY OF (Bli BRITISH COLUMBIA b OFFICERS OF THE DEPARTMENT VICTCRIA, B.C. 1961 PHYSIOGRAPHY Physiographic divisions and names are established by the Geographic Board of Canada. Recently H. S. Bostock, of the Geological Survey of Canada, studied the physiography of the northern Cordilleran region; his report and maps are published CI I c Fig. 1. Rglief map of British Columbia. in Memoir 247 of the Geological Survey, Department of Mines and Resources, Ottawa. The divisions shown on the accompanying sketch, Figure 2, and the nomenclature used in the text are those proposed by Bostock. Most of the Province of British Columbia lies within the region of mountains and plateaus, the Cordillera of Western Canada, that forms the western border of the North American Continent. The extreme northeastern comer of the Province, lying east of the Cordillera, is part of the Great Plains region. The Rocky Mountain Area extends along the eastern boundary of the Province for a distance of 400 miles, and continues northwestward for an additional 500 miles entirely within the Province. The high, rugged Rocky Mountains, averaging about 50 miles in width, are flanked on the west by a remarkably long and straight valley, known as the Rocky Mountain Trench, and occupied from south to north by the Kootenay, Columbia, Canoe, Fraser, Parsnip, Finlay, Fox, and Kechika Rivers. Of these, the first four flow into the Pacific Ocean and the second four join the Mackenzie River to flow ultimately into the Arctic Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • An Independent Newspaper for the Pacific Northwest AUGUST 1997 VOL
    An Independent Newspaper for the Pacific Northwest AUGUST 1997 VOL. 3 No. 3 Dear Reader early all the problems we face in Cascadia boil down to population. NAs Alan Durning and Christopher Crowther point out in their new book, Misplaced Blame: The Real Roots of Population Growth, the Pacific Northwest is growing nearly twice the North American rate and almost 50 percent faster than the global population. The Northwest population reached 15 million EDITORIAL in mid-1997 and is swelling by another 1 million every 40 months. Starting this month, with our cover story on growth pressures in the scenic Columbia River Gorge, Cascadia Times Boom Times The UnbearableRightness ot Breen will publish an occasional series on, Can the Columbia River Gorge survive the Life on the fault line of environmentally growth, growth management strategies demand for development? and what it all means. As senior editor correct energy Kathie Durbin reports from the Columbia by Kathie Durbin Page 9 Gorge, local politics threaten this national by Kevin Bell Page 7 treasure. This is true everywhere, because growth and land-use decisions are in varyingdegrees made at the local THE USUAL STUFF level. We aren't saying that local commu• FIELD NOTES: Green groups clash over Sierra REALITY CHECK: 16 nities cannot do a good job protecting places such as the Gorge, Snoqualmie logging. EPA fines big Alaska mine. toxic waste POINT OF VIEW: The ASARCO juggernaut and Pass, Whidbey Island, Lake Tahoe or the on crops. Oregon slams nuclear weapons plan 3 Muir Woods, to name just a few places of its proposed Rock Creek Mine.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Forest Insect and Disease Conditions and Program Highlights
    R1-16-17 03/20/2016 Forest Service Northern Region Montata Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Forestry Division In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Linear Developments on Wildlife
    Bibliography Rec# 5. LeBlanc, R. 1991. The aversive conditioning of a roadside habituated grizzly bear within Banff Park: progress report 1991. 6 pp. road impacts/ grizzly bear/ Ursus arctos/ Banff National Park/ aversive conditions/ Icefields Parkway. Rec# 10. Forman, R.T.T. 1983. Corridors in a landscape: their ecological structure and function. Ekologia 2 (4):375-87. corridors/ landscape/ width. Rec# 11. McLellan, B.N. 1989. Dymanics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. III Natality and rate of increase. Can. J. Zool. Vol. 67 :1865-1868. reproductive rate/ grizzly bear/ Ursus arctos/ British Columbia/ gas exploration/ timber harvest. Rec# 14. McLellan, B.N. 1989. Dynamics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. II.Mortality rates and causes of death. Can. J. Zool. Vol. 67 :1861-1864. British Columbia/ grizzly bear/ Ursus arctos/ mortality rate/ hunting/ outdoor recreation/ gas exploration/ timber harvest. Rec# 15. Miller, S.D., Schoen, J. 1993. The Brown Bear in Alaska . brown bear/ grizzly bear/ Ursus arctos middendorfi/ Ursus arctos horribilis/ population density/ distribution/ legal status/ human-bear interactions/ management/ education. Rec# 16. Archibald, W.R., Ellis, R., Hamilton, A.N. 1987. Responses of grizzly bears to logging truck traffic in the Kimsquit River valley, British Columbia. Int. Conf. Bear Res. and Manage. 7:251-7. grizzly bear/ Ursus / arctos/ roads/ traffic/ logging/ displacement/ disturbance/ carnivore/ BC/ individual disruption / habitat displacement / habitat disruption / social / filter-barrier. Rec# 20. Kasworm, W.F., Manley, T.L. 1990. Road and trail influences on grizzly bears and black bears in northwest Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway 3: Transportation Mitigation for Wildlife and Connectivity in the Crown of the Continent Ecosystem
    Highway 3: Transportation Mitigation for Wildlife and Connectivity May 2010 Prepared with the: support of: Galvin Family Fund Kayak Foundation HIGHWAY 3: TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FOR WILDLIFE AND CONNECTIVITY IN THE CROWN OF THE CONTINENT ECOSYSTEM Final Report May 2010 Prepared by: Anthony Clevenger, PhD Western Transportation Institute, Montana State University Clayton Apps, PhD, Aspen Wildlife Research Tracy Lee, MSc, Miistakis Institute, University of Calgary Mike Quinn, PhD, Miistakis Institute, University of Calgary Dale Paton, Graduate Student, University of Calgary Dave Poulton, LLB, LLM, Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative Robert Ament, M Sc, Western Transportation Institute, Montana State University TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables .....................................................................................................................................................iv List of Figures.....................................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................................vi Introduction........................................................................................................................................................1 Background........................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Dishman Hills Structure and Hydrogeology
    Eastern Washington University EWU Digital Commons Geosciences Student Work Geosciences 2021 Analysis of Dishman Hills Structure and Hydrogeology Cole R. McGregor Eastern Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.ewu.edu/geosci_student Part of the Earth Sciences Commons, and the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation McGregor, Cole R., "Analysis of Dishman Hills Structure and Hydrogeology" (2021). Geosciences Student Work. 1. https://dc.ewu.edu/geosci_student/1 This Poster is brought to you for free and open access by the Geosciences at EWU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geosciences Student Work by an authorized administrator of EWU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Analysis of Dishman Hills Structure and Hydrogeology Cole McGregor Eastern Washington University, Department of Geology Abstract: The structural and hydrogeology of Dishman Hills Conservation Area was interpreted to gain a better picture of its interaction with the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie aquifer. The rock in this area is Precambrian Ravalli Group with granitic migmatites. This is due to Figure 9: exhumation causing decompression melting in between the bed layers. Other rocks such as amphibolite, gneiss, schist, quartzite, and phyllite are seen along with granitic dikes (WSDNR). This rock type covers all of the Dishman area and is Precambrian in age. Due to The image shows areas of water ponding that don’t tectonic forces in the Spokane area, fractures have also formed within the Precambrian rock. Water will concentrate in fracture zones, enter the aquifer as green polygons. These seem to be known to be areas of groundwater drainage.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Mountain Goat Management Plan (2019-2024)
    Idaho Mountain Goat Management Plan 2019-2024 Prepared by IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME June 2019 Recommended Citation: Idaho Mountain Goat Management Plan 2019-2024. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, USA. Team Members: Paul Atwood – Regional Wildlife Biologist Nathan Borg – Regional Wildlife Biologist Clay Hickey – Regional Wildlife Manager Michelle Kemner – Regional Wildlife Biologist Hollie Miyasaki– Wildlife Staff Biologist Morgan Pfander – Regional Wildlife Biologist Jake Powell – Regional Wildlife Biologist Bret Stansberry – Regional Wildlife Biologist Leona Svancara – GIS Analyst Laura Wolf – Team Leader & Regional Wildlife Biologist Contributors: Frances Cassirer – Wildlife Research Biologist Mark Drew – Wildlife Veterinarian Jon Rachael – Wildlife Game Manager Additional copies: Additional copies can be downloaded from the Idaho Department of Fish and Game website at fishandgame.idaho.gov Front Cover Photo: ©Hollie Miyasaki, IDFG Back Cover Photo: ©Laura Wolf, IDFG Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) adheres to all applicable state and federal laws and regulations related to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, gender, disability or veteran’s status. If you feel you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility of IDFG, or if you desire further information, please write to: Idaho Department of Fish and Game, P.O. Box 25, Boise, ID 83707 or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Federal Assistance, Mailstop: MBSP-4020, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203, Telephone: (703) 358-2156. This publication will be made available in alternative formats upon request. Please contact IDFG for assistance. Costs associated with this publication are available from IDFG in accordance with Section 60-202, Idaho Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving Trails and Providing Solutions May-June
    PONDEROSA BACK COUNTRY HORSEMEN OF WASHINGTON Preserving Trails and Providing Solutions May-June 2018 VOLUNTEER HOURS DUE BY MAY 25! Please be sure to turn in your volunteer hours to Carol Klar by May 25! Any time you spend working on BCH stuff (phone calls, trail clearing, work parties, paperwork, whatever) counts towards your volunteer hours. If you have questions, give Carol a call. BCHA Annual Board Meeting By Ken Carmichael The BCHA board meeting was held in Airway Heights Washington April 23-25. This annual event is hosted by a different state each year. It is a time to be very proud of being a BCHW member. The team that put on the event did a great job. Our national directors Darrell Wallace and Jason Ridlon had the event brought to Washington and helped arrange for the nice facilities. Alternate Director Bill McKenna coordinated all of the volunteers. BCHW President Kathy Young and many volunteers were on site to help. Among those was PBCH member Doug Bailey helping with registration and other duties. BCHW Executive Director Nicole Sedgwick provided the other states with an update on the status of the Your Membership program and I spoke about the Membership Development Program. Darrell is also Vice President of BCHA. BCHW member Mike McGlenn was elected to the Executive Committee of BCHA. BCHW continues to be a leader among the states. This board meeting provided many opportunities for sharing information among the states and committees. A new feature was a break out into 4 regions to discuss issues. Then each region had the opportunity to discuss these issues with the BCHA 10 standing committees.
    [Show full text]
  • REGULAR MEETING of COUNCIL Town Hall, 305 Iles Way
    REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCIL Town Hall, 305 Iles Way MISSION STATEMENT Council is committed to excellence in government that reflects our citizens’ interests, values and goals. We will strive to deliver quality public services in a proactive and responsible manner while ensuring our objectives are clearly communicated to our citizens. We will strive to strengthen and diversify our economy by balancing public safety, industrial development, environmental responsibility and sustainability. MONDAY, JULY 13, 2020 5:00 PM A G E N D A Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 2.1 APPROVAL OF AGENDA RECOMMENDATION THAT the Monday, July 13, 2020 Regular Council Meeting agenda be adopted as presented. 3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 9 - 11 3.1 JUNE 8, 2020 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES RECOMMENDATION THAT the minutes from the Monday, June 8, 2020 Special Meeting of Council Page 1 of 139 be adopted as presented. Special Meeting of Council - 08 Jun 2020 - Minutes - Pdf 12 - 19 3.2 JUNE 15, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES RECOMMENDATION THAT the minutes from the Monday, June 15, 2020 Regular Meeting of Council be adopted as presented. Regular Meeting of Council - 15 Jun 2020 - Minutes - Pdf 20 - 21 3.3 JUNE 29, 2020 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING RECOMMENDATION THAT the minutes from the Monday, June 29, 2020 Special Meeting of Council be adopted as presented. Special Meeting of Council - 29 Jun 2020 - Minutes - Pdf 4. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES 5. PROCLAMATIONS None 6. DELEGATIONS AND PETITIONS None 7. CONSENT AGENDA 7.1 CONSENT AGENDA RECOMMENDATION THAT all items in the Monday, July 13, 2020 consent agenda be moved for information.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Ecoregions of Idaho
    1 0 . C o l u m b i a P l a t e a u 1 3 . C e n t r a l B a s i n a n d R a n g e Ecoregion 10 is an arid grassland and sagebrush steppe that is surrounded by moister, predominantly forested, mountainous ecoregions. It is Ecoregion 13 is internally-drained and composed of north-trending, fault-block ranges and intervening, drier basins. It is vast and includes parts underlain by thick basalt. In the east, where precipitation is greater, deep loess soils have been extensively cultivated for wheat. of Nevada, Utah, California, and Idaho. In Idaho, sagebrush grassland, saltbush–greasewood, mountain brush, and woodland occur; forests are absent unlike in the cooler, wetter, more rugged Ecoregion 19. Grazing is widespread. Cropland is less common than in Ecoregions 12 and 80. Ecoregions of Idaho The unforested hills and plateaus of the Dissected Loess Uplands ecoregion are cut by the canyons of Ecoregion 10l and are disjunct. 10f Pure grasslands dominate lower elevations. Mountain brush grows on higher, moister sites. Grazing and farming have eliminated The arid Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins ecoregion is nearly flat, internally-drained, and has light-colored alkaline soils that are Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions Literature Cited: much of the original plant cover. Nevertheless, Ecoregion 10f is not as suited to farming as Ecoregions 10h and 10j because it has thinner soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Development Plan
    Municipality of Crowsnest Pass MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN BYLAW NO. 1059, 2020 © 2021 Oldman River Regional Services Commission Prepared for the Municipality of Crowsnest Pass This document is protected by Copyright and Trademark and may not be reproduced or modified in any manner, or for any purpose, except by written permission of the Oldman River Regional Services Commission. This document has been prepared for the sole use of the Municipality addressed and the Oldman River Regional Services Commission. This disclaimer is attached to and forms part of the document. ii MUNICIPALITY OF CROWSNEST PASS BYLAW NO. 1059, 2020 MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN BYLAW BEING a bylaw of the Municipality of Crowsnest Pass, in the Province of Alberta, to adopt a new Municipal Development Plan for the municipality. AND WHEREAS section 632 of the Municipal Government Act requires all municipalities in the provinceto adopt a municipaldevelopment plan by bylaw; AND WHEREAS the purpose of the proposed Bylaw No. 1059, 2020 is to provide a comprehensive, long-range land use plan and development framework pursuant to the provisions outlined in the Act; AND WHEREAS the municipal council has requested the preparation of a long-range plan to fulfill the requirementsof the Act and provide for its consideration at a public hearing; NOW THEREFORE, under the authority and subject to the provisions of the Municipal Government Act, Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000, Chapter M-26, as amended, the Council of the Municipality of Crowsnest Pass in the province of Alberta duly assembled does hereby enact the following: 1. Bylaw No. 1059, 2020, being the new Municipal Development Plan Bylaw is hereby adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Country Horsemen of Idaho Annual Report 2017 Idaho Volunteer Efforts Were Valued at $710,287.34
    Back Country Horsemen of Idaho Annual Report 2017 Idaho Volunteer efforts were valued at $710,287.34 Boise Chapter BCH In addition to our spring philanthropy fund raiser ride for St. Jude; the Boise Chapter had two, three person crews on the ground for two days each in 2017. Each crew consisted of two BCH members and one non- member. The projects resulted in approximately 8 miles of non-wilderness trail clearing. Cache Peak BCH This past year was a productive year for our chapter. We started the year with Ken Crane, Burley BLM field manger, coming to our February meeting. We discussed possible projects. As a result, our chapter applied for a grant with the Idaho Hose Board to upgrade the trailhead at Cottonwood WLMA. We had a fundraiser yard sale in May. We had several trail cleaning projects starting with several trails at Bennett Springs/Pomerelle throughout June, July, and August. In October we cleaned trails at Big Cottonwood WLMA. In June we had a booth at the Search and Rescue event put on by Life Flight in Burley. Cache Peak was represented at the March convention in Boise and the September Directors meeting in Idaho Falls. We had our Christmas party at Carolyn Weimer’s house. We hope to have rides this coming year with High Desert and Portneuf River chapters this coming year. We are planning an Obstacle course event and hope to ride in one parade this year. “We clean trails as we ride” Heartland Back Country Horsemen 2017 year in Review Heartland’s year started with putting into place some ideas discussed at the Coalition of Parks and Recreation attended by President Robert Wagner and Vice-president Paul Kleint.
    [Show full text]