The Profile of Carotenoids and Other Bioactive Molecules in Various

molecules

Article The Proﬁle of Carotenoids and Other Bioactive Molecules in Various Pumpkin Fruits (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) Cultivars

Bartosz Kulczy ´nski* and Anna Gramza-Michałowska

Department of Gastronomy Sciences and Functional Foods, Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, Pozna´nUniversity of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 31, 60–624 Pozna´n,Poland * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-61-848-7330

Academic Editor: Benoît Schoefs Received: 20 July 2019; Accepted: 3 September 2019; Published: 4 September 2019

Abstract: Bioactive compounds are significant to human nutrition. They are beneficial to health as they inhibit the development of numerous diseases of affluence. Scientists continuously search for natural sources of these components. At present, the chemical composition of various plants is under investigation. Many researchers are interested in pumpkin (Cucurbita L. spp.). Different organs of this plant (pulp, seeds, flowers, leaves, shoots, roots) are consumed almost all over the world. They contain large amounts of bioactive compounds. Pumpkin pulp is used to prepare various dishes. It is also widely used in the food industry for the production of pastries, baked goods, juices, jams, marinades, and baby food. The content of carotenoids in the pumpkin has been documented in a large number of publications. However, so far there has been no complex analysis of the profile of other bioactive compounds. This article analyses 11 pumpkin cultivars of the Cucurbita maxima Duchesne species. It compares the chemical composition of the pulp and analyses the content of bioactive compounds such as carotenoids, polyphenols (flavonols and phenolic acids), tocopherols, minerals (K, Ca, Mg, Na, Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn), vitamins (C, B1, folates). In view of available information, the study provides an innovative approach. The analysis showed high diversity in the concentration of individual components between the cultivars. The research proved that pumpkin pulp was not only a source of carotenoids but also other bioactive compounds.

Keywords: pumpkin fruits; Cucurbita maxima Duchesne; bioactive compounds; cluster analysis

1. Introduction The diet is unquestionably significant for human health because it inhibits the development of numerous diseases of affluence [1]. Scientists continue searching for appropriate nutritional models with a positive effect on all people’s health. Research on the chemical composition of raw materials and food products consumed in an everyday diet is one of the tools helping to achieve this goal. Identifying the content of individual compounds enables personalization of diets according to consumers’ individual needs. Fruit and vegetables are a very important group of products, which make the base of the food pyramid. They contain a large number of bioactive compounds which are beneficial to health [2]. The definition of bioactive compounds is not fully consistent, but according to many authors, it is a group of physiologically active components of animal and plant origin, which may modify the organism physiology and metabolism when consumed. Simultaneously, they exhibit a wide spectrum of health-promoting effects and they are safe to health [3]. This group mostly includes polyphenols, carotenoids, tocopherols, sterols, stanols, minerals, vitamins, bioactive proteins, peptides, dietary fiber, pre- and probiotics, and fatty acids. These compounds have been proved to have a positive effect on human health.

Molecules 2019, 24, 3212; doi:10.3390/molecules24183212 www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules Molecules 2018, 23, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 22

Many studies have confirmed their inhibition of cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, infectious, and neurodegenerative diseases, as well as their therapeutic effect in carbohydrate metabolism Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 2 of 19 disorders [4–7]. Pumpkin (Cucurbita L.) is a rich source of bioactive compounds. It is an annual plant of the Cucurbitaceae family, which includes about 130 genera and more than 800 species [8]. It is Manybelieved studies that the have pumpkin confirmed is the their most inhibition diverse of vegetable cardiovascular, in terms gastrointestinal, of characteristics infectious, such as size, shape, and neurodegenerativecolor [9]. Pumpkins diseases, blooms asfrom well July as to their September therapeutic and e fftheect seeds in carbohydrate ripen from metabolismAugust to October [10]. disordersThe [origin4–7]. Pumpkin of the pumpkin (Cucurbita hasL.) not is a richbeen source clearly of identified, bioactive compounds. but it is supposed It is an annual to have plant been of first grown the Cucurbitaceaein present-dayfamily, Mexico which about includes 5500 about BC. 130 At generapresent and pumpkins more than are 800 common species [8 almost]. It is believed all over the world. that the pumpkin is the most diverse vegetable in terms of characteristics such as size, shape, color [9]. They can mostly be found in Europe, North and South Americas as well as some regions in Asia Pumpkins blooms from July to September and the seeds ripen from August to October [10]. The origin (India, China) [11]. In 2013, the global production of pumpkin accounted for 24,679.859 tons. China of the pumpkin has not been clearly identified, but it is supposed to have been first grown in present-day Mexico(7155.250 about 5500 tons), BC. India At present (4900.000 pumpkins tons), are and common Russia almost (1.128.205 all over tons) the world. have Theythe largest can mostly share in world be foundproduction. in Europe, The North total and area South of pumpkin Americas cultivation as well as some in India regions is 1.8 in Asiamln (India,hectares, China) and [ 11it ].is more than In 2013,three the times global as production large as ofin pumpkin the order accounted of China for [12]. 24,679.859 Nearly tons. all China organs (7155.250 of the pumpkin tons), India plant (fruits, (4900.000flowers, tons), leaves, and Russia roots, (1128.205 shoots, tons) and haveseeds) the are largest edible, share with in world some production. differences The between total area cultivars of [13,14]. pumpkinFor example, cultivation oils in India from is different 1.8 mln hectares, pumpkin and seeds it is more may than have three different times assensory large as characteristic in the order (e.g. taste, of Chinasmell). [12]. In Nearly addition, all organs it was of not the pumpkinclearly stated plant whether, (fruits, flowers, for example, leaves, roots, all decorative shoots, and pumpkin seeds) varieties are edible,are edible. with some However, differences it is worth between to cultivarsbe careful [13 when,14]. For deciding example, to oilsconsume from di lessfferent known pumpkin varietes, usually seedsused may havefor decoration. different sensory The characteristicresults of research (e.g., taste, using smell). squashes In addition, show it that was notsome clearly varieties stated may lead to whether,gastrointestinal for example, all discomfort decorative (abdominal pumpkin varieties pain, are vomiting, edible. However, diarrhea). it isThe worth authors to be careful of the experiment whenrecommend deciding to consumenot to use less all known these varieties varietes, usuallythat have used a bitter for decoration. taste [15]. The Before results consumption of research pumpkin is using squashes show that some varieties may lead to gastrointestinal discomfort (abdominal pain, usually boiled, baked, or processed into marinades, juices, jams, etc. It is also used in the food vomiting, diarrhea). The authors of the experiment recommend not to use all these varieties that have industry as an ingredient of pastries, baked goods, sweets, and baby food [16–18]. a bitter taste [15]. Before consumption pumpkin is usually boiled, baked, or processed into marinades, Pumpkin pulp is thought to be a source of carotenoids. So far, most studies on the chemical juices, jams, etc. It is also used in the food industry as an ingredient of pastries, baked goods, sweets, and babycomposition food [16– 18of]. pumpkin pulp have focused on the content of these compounds [19–24]. In spite of Pumpkinthe considerable pulp is thought interest to in be the a sourcechemical ofcarotenoids. and health-promoting So far, most properties studies on theof pumpkin, chemical there have compositionbeen few of pumpkinstudies on pulp the have profile focused of other on the bioactive content ofcompounds, these compounds which [ 19are–24 important]. In spite offor the nutrition [25]. considerableApart from interest that, in theas was chemical mentioned and health-promoting in the Introduction, properties there of pumpkin,are a lot of there cultivars have been within few one species. studiesTherefore, on the profile this ofstudy other attempts bioactive to compounds, make a comparative which are important analysis for of nutritionthe content [25]. of Apart bioactive from compounds that, as(carotenoids, was mentioned polyphenols, in the Introduction, tocopherols, there areminerals, a lot of vitamins)cultivars within in 11 one fruits species. of pumpkin Therefore, cultivars (C. this studymaxima attempts Duchesne). to make Chemical a comparative structures analysis of of some the content bioactive of bioactive compounds compounds found (carotenoids, in pumpkin fruits are polyphenols,shown in tocopherols, Figure 1. minerals, vitamins) in 11 fruits of pumpkin cultivars (C. maxima Duchesne). Chemical structures of some bioactive compounds found in pumpkin fruits are shown in Figure1.

Figure 1. Chemical structure of selected bioactive compounds found in pumpkin ﬂesh (A—β-carotene, B—lutein, C—α-tocopherol, D—caﬀeic acid, E—rutin, F—ascorbic acid). Figure 1. Chemical structure of selected bioactive compounds found in pumpkin flesh (A—β- carotene, B—lutein, C—α-tocopherol, D—caffeic acid, E—rutin, F—ascorbic acid).

2. Results and Discussion

Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 3 of 19

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Bioactive Compounds Content Carotenoids are an important group of bioactive compounds, which are ascribed a broad spectrum of health-promoting effects. So far research has proved high diversity in carotenoid concentration in different Cucurbitaceae species and cultivars. Table1 shows the content of individual carotenoids in the pumpkin cultivars under study. We chose these carotenoids, which are most often discussed in the literature in terms of the pumpkin chemical composition. The carotenoids under analysis (zeaxanthin, lutein, and β-carotene) were found in all the cultivars. There were statistically significant differences between all the cultivars in the content of zeaxanthin and lutein. The highest content of these carotenoids was found in the ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ (zeaxanthin: 192.5 µg/g, lutein: 388.79 µg/g) and ‘Green Hubbard’ cultivars (zeaxanthin: 103.87 µg/g, lutein: 239.38 µg/g). The lowest content of zeaxanthin was found in the ‘Buttercup’ cultivar (19.57 µg/g), whereas the lowest content of lutein was measured in the ‘Porcelain Doll’ cultivar (87.2 µg/g). The highest content of β-carotene was found in the ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ (115.29 µg/g) and ‘Jumbo Ping Banana’ cultivars (102.45 µg/g), whereas the lowest content was measured in the ‘Porcelain Doll’ (38.67 µg/g), ‘Hokkaido’ (40.10 µg/g) ‘Marina di Chioggia’ (47.17 µg/g), and ‘Jarrahdale’ cultivars (49.38 µg/g). Lutein was the predominant carotenoid in all the cultivars. The results were used to calculate the retinol equivalent—a measure of the provitamin A content. The highest content of provitamin A was found in the ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ (67.66 µg/g), ‘Green Hubbard’ (43.54 µg/g) and ‘Jumbo Pink Banana’ cultivars (41.68 µg/g), whereas the lowest content was measured in the ‘Porcelain Doll’ (15.9 µg/g) and ‘Marina di Chioggia’ cultivars (22.2 µg/g). Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 4 of 19

Table 1. The content of carotenoids and tocopherols in pumpkin varieties.

Melonowa Porcelain Jumbo Pink Marina di Green Cultivars Bambino Hokkaido Gomez Blue Kuri Buttercup Jarrahdale Z˙ ółta Doll Banana Chioggia Hubbard

Zeaxanthin 53.52 0.44 91.06 1.41 75.44 0.69 192.53 3.30 26.32 0.49 44.17 0.20 19.57 0.44 82.75 1.06 63.72 1.42 48.01 0.82 103.87 4.60 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Lutein 143.02 1.58 130.23 1.30 118.60 0.79 388.79 1.71 87.20 0.73 149.42 2.77 99.05 2.10 212.52 1.60 111.93 2.25 124.08 2.07 239.38 8.48 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ±

g dm) a a

/ β-carotene 86.41 1.35 40.10 0.15 51.28 1.15 115.29 0.95 38.67 1.71 56.03 0.56 79.61 0.34 102.45 1.43 49.38 1.21 47.17 1.00 89.59 2.60 g ± ± a ± a ± ± ± a ± b ± ± b ± ± µ Retinol equivalent 30.78 0.17 25.12 0.24 24.72 0.29 67.66 0.28 15.90 0.36 25.47 0.16 23.15 0.27 41.68 0.45 22.87 0.49 22.20 0.36 43.54 1.42 Carotenoids ( ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ±

α-tocopherol 4.50 0.05 2.82 0.03 a 4.94 0.03 8.89 0.02 3.70 0.02 3.47 0.04 3.85 0.02 1.55 0.01 2.85 0.01 a 4.39 0.02 4.07 0.04 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± 100 g dm) / γ-tocopherol 2.80 0.03 5.45 0.03 a 3.57 0.11 b 17.32 0.32 1.60 0.02 5.27 0.03 a 3.09 0.01 6.33 0.06 0.97 0.02 3.63 0.09 b 3.36 0.16 α ± a ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± a ± (mg Tocopherols -tocopherol equivalent 4.78 0.01 3.36 0.02 5.29 0.02 10.62 0.03 3.86 0.02 4.00 0.01 4.16 0.02 2.19 0.01 2.94 0.01 4.76 0.02 4.41 0.06 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± a, b—means in the same verse followed by the same letters do not signiﬁcantly diﬀer (p < 0.05) in terms of analyzed variables, dm—dry mass, the results are expressed as the mean values standard deviation of the triplicate samples, δ-tocopherol and β-tocopherol were not detected in the evaluated samples. ± Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 5 of 19

Seleim et al. analyzed the content of β-carotene in the ‘Faraskour’, ’El-Zarka’ and ‘Kafr El-Battikh-2’ cultivars of the C. maxima Duchesne species and proved significant differences. The researchers noted the highest β-carotene concentration in the ‘Kafr El-Battikh-2’ cultivar (3313.46 µg/100 g). However, it was lower than the concentration measured in the cultivars analyzed in our study. Norshazila et al. [22] studied cultivars of the Cucurbita moschata species and observed that β-carotene was the predominant carotenoid. The cultivars also contained small amounts of lutein and α-carotene. We made different observations in our study, where lutein was the most abundant carotenoid. The different proportions of lutein: beta-carotene may be influenced mainly by two factors. The first is the type of variety. For example, in the ‘Buttercup’ variety the ratio of lutein, beta-carotene is close to 1:1. In turn for the ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ variety, the ratio is over 3:1. Secondly, the proportion of lutein: beta-carotene can also be affected by the growing conditions, the maturation period, and the storage time of the pumpkin. It seems that during the growth and maturation of the plant, as well as the storage of fruit, the conversion of individual carotenoids may proceed at different rates. As Jaswir et al. showed that during pumpkin fruits storage, the concentration of lutein increases, while beta-carotene decreases. The changes in carotenoids also depend on sun exposure, temperature, water availability, and soil composition. It is believed that the highest concentration of carotenoids occurs in the first stages of fruit formation. After their maturation, the content of these compounds is significantly reduced. However, the directions of these changes are not examined in detail and may constitute an interesting and new purpose of research [26]. Seven cultivars of three species (C. maxima Duchesne, C. moschata, C. pepo L.) were characterized by high diversity in the content of β-carotene. The highest content of carotenoids was found in the ‘Kroshka’ (6.59 mg/100 g, C. maxima Duchesne), ‘Zemcuzina’ (5.30 mg/100 g, C. moschata) and ‘Bambino’ cultivars (4.50 mg/100 g, C. maxima Duchesne), whereas the lowest content was measured in the ‘Zalushka’ (0.30 mg/100 g, C. pepo L) and ‘Kustovaja’ cultivars (0.58 mg/100 g, C. pepo L). The β-carotene concentration in the ‘Kroshka’ and ‘Zemcuzina’ cultivars was similar to the content measured in cultivars analyzed by other researchers, e.g., ‘Gomez’, ‘Blue Kuri’, ‘Jarrahdale’ [20]. Kulaitiene˙ et al. [21] analyzed the ‘Justynka F1’, ‘Karowita’, ‘Amazonka’ cultivars of the C. maxima Duchesne species and found that lutein and zeaxanthin were the most abundant carotenoids (7.96–12.31 mg/100 g). There were similar results in our study, where lutein and zeaxanthin were the predominant carotenoids [21]. The content of β-carotene ranged from 1.86 to 2.42 mg/100 g and it was lower than the content of this carotenoid measured in the cultivars analyzed in our study. The samples also contained lycopene (0.72–0.81 mg/100 g). Azevedo-Meleiro et al. [19] found different carotenoids, depending on the pumpkin species and cultivar (Azevedo-Meleiro and Rodriguez-Amaya, 2007). The ‘Menina Brasileira’ and ‘Goianinha’ cultivars (C. moschata) were characterized by high content of α-carotene (23.8–26.8 µg/g) as well as β-carotene (56.7–66.7 µg/g), like the ‘Jarrahdale’ (49.38 µg/g), ‘Gomez’ (51.28 µg/g) and ‘Blue Kuri’ (56.03 µg/g) cultivars analyzed in our study. There were smaller amounts of lutein and neoxanthin. The ‘Exposicao’ cultivar had the highest content of violaxanthin (20.6 µg/g). The ‘Tetsukabuto’ cultivar (C. maxima Duchesne C. moschata hybrid) contained the most × lutein (56.6 µg/g), but its content was lower than the content of this carotenoid measured in all the cultivars analyzed in our study (87.2–388 µg/g). Table1 shows the content of tocopherols. The pumpkin cultivars analyzed in our study contained two forms: α- and γ-tocopherol, but none of them contained δ- or β-tocopherol. The ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ cultivar had the highest content of α-tocopherol (8.89 mg/100 g). The ‘Gomez’ and ‘Marina di Chioggia’ cultivars also contained high amounts of this compound (4.94 mg/100 g and 4.39 mg/100 g, respectively). The lowest concentration of α-tocopherol was measured in the following cultivars: ‘Jumbo Pink Banana’ (1.55 mg/100 g), ‘Hokkaido’ (2.82 mg/100 g) and ‘Jarrahdale’ (2.85 mg/100 g). Similarly, to the content of α-tocopherol, the ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ cultivar was characterized by the highest concentration of γ-tocopherol (17.32 mg/100 g). The lowest concentration of γ-tocopherol was measured in the following cultivars: Jarrahdale” (0.97 mg/100 g), ‘Porcelain Doll’ (1.6 mg/100 g) and ‘Bambino’ (2.8 mg/100 g). The contents of individual tocopherols were used to calculate the Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 6 of 19

α-tocopherol equivalent. The highest values of the α-tocopherol equivalent were measured in two cultivars, i.e., ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ (10.62 mg/100 g) and ‘Hokkaido’ (5.29 mg/100 g). The lowest values of the α-tocopherol equivalent were measured in the ‘Jumbo Pink Banana’ (2.19 mg/100 g) and ‘Jarrahdale’ cultivars (2.94 mg/100 g). Like in our study, Seleim et al. [23] observed that the pulp of pumpkins of the C. maxima Duchesne species contained α-tocopherol. The authors of the study found that the ‘El Zarka’ cultivar had the highest content of this component (1547.35 µg/100 g). However, it was smaller than the content of α-tocopherol measured in all the cultivars analyzed in our study and it was very similar to the content measured in the ‘Jumbo Pink Banana’ cultivar (1.55 mg/100 g). The lowest content of α-tocopherol was found in the ‘Kafr El-Battikh-2’ cultivar (774.52 µg/100 g). The statistical analysis also confirmed that the content of this component in pumpkin pulp was significantly greater than in pumpkin skin. There are no data on the content of individual tocopherols in pumpkin pulp. Stevenson et al. [27] characterized the profile of these compounds in oil extracted from pumpkin seeds. They observed the highest content of α-tocopherol in the following cultivars: ‘Warren Scarlet’ (75.1 µg/g), ‘Big Max’ (61.3 µg/g) and ‘Zapallo Macre’ (57.6 µg/g). Our study showed that the pulp of the ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ cultivar was the most abundant in α-tocopherol (8.89 mg/100 g). The other cultivars contained smaller amounts of this compound (1.55–4.94 mg/100 g) [27]. There was low content of α-tocopherol in pumpkin seed oil extracted from the following cultivars: ‘Delica’ (27.1 µg/g), ‘Yogorou’ (29.6 µg/g) and ‘Cha Cha’ (29.9 µg/g). As far as γ-tocopherol is concerned, the ‘Big Max’ (492.8 µg/g), ‘Rouge Vif d’Etampes’ (285.7 µg/g) and ‘Yogorou’ cultivars (227.0 µg/g) were the most abundant in this compound. There was considerable diversity between the cultivars in their content of δ-tocopherol, which ranged from 35.3 to 1109.7 µg/g. The highest content of this compound was found in the ‘Kurijiman’ cultivar. We did not find δ-tocopherol in the pumpkin pulp in our study. Ryan et al. compared the content of tocopherols in different seeds, cereals, and leguminous plants [28]. They proved that pumpkin seeds contained more α-tocopherol (0.9 mg/100 g) than butter beans (0.7 mg/100 g), spelt (0.6 mg/100 g), buckwheat (0.1 mg/100 g), maize (0.2 mg/100 g), millet (0.2 mg/100 g), linseed (0.1 mg/100 g), mustard (0.6 mg/100 g), and poppy (0.2 mg/100 g). Apart from that, the research proved that pumpkin seeds contained the largest amounts of β + γ-tocopherol (14.8 mg/100 g). The analysis of the content of phenolic acids confirmed high diversity between the pumpkin cultivars (Table2). This work focuses on the determination of the selected phenolic compounds content. For the study, phenolic acids and flavonols, which are most often analyzed in plant-derived products and discussed in literature were selected. The ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ cultivar had the highest content of gallic acid (18.90 mg/100 g) and protocatechuic acid (47.89 mg/100 g). The highest content of p-coumaric acid was found in the ‘Hokkaido’ cultivar (3.47 mg/100 g), and the highest content of ferulic acid was found in the ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ cultivar (33.50 mg/100 g). The lowest content of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4.95 mg/100 g) and ferulic acid (6.87 mg/100 g) was found in the ‘Green Hubbard’ cultivar. The ‘Bambino’ cultivar was characterized by the lowest concentration of gallic acid (2.58 mg/100 g) and protocatechuic acid (5.09 mg/100 g). Apart from that, it did not contain phenolic acids or p-coumaric acid, which was also the case with the ‘Gomez’ cultivar. The ‘Jarrahdale’, ‘Buttercup’, ‘Porcelain Doll’, and ‘Gomez’ cultivars did not contain any sinapic acid. The analysis of the samples showed diversified content of flavonols (Table2). All the cultivars contained rutin. The highest content of this compound was found in the ‘Bambino’ cultivar (51.92 mg/100 g), whereas the lowest content was measured in the ‘Marina di Chioggia’ cultivar (5.09 mg/100 g). The ‘Bambino’ cultivar was also characterized by the highest concentration of astragalin (28.03 mg/100 g) and myricetin (9.04 mg/100 g). Some pumpkin cultivars did not contain kaempferol (‘Bambino’, ‘Porcelain Doll’, ‘Buttercup’, ‘Jarrahdale’), astragalin (‘Hokkaido’, ‘Gomez’, ‘Buttercup’, ‘Jumbo Pink Banana’, ‘Green Hubbard’), myricetin (‘Gomez’, ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’, ‘Jarrahdale’, ‘Marina di Chioggia’), or isoquercetin (‘Buttercup’, ‘Green Hubbard’). The ‘Jumbo Pink Banana’ cultivar did not contain quercetin. There are few publications on the profile of phenolic compounds in pumpkin fruit. Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 7 of 19

Table 2. The content of phenolic acids and ﬂavonols in pumpkin varieties.

Melonowa Porcelain Jumbo Pink Marina di Green Cultivars Bambino Hokkaido Gomez Blue Kuri Buttercup Jarrahdale Z˙ ółta Doll Banana Chioggia Hubbard Gallic acid 2.58 0.01 8.05 0.03 6.18 0.09 18.90 0.18 11.44 0.17 8.88 0.08 14.22 0.26 5.93 0.10 12.01 0.18 15.30 0.08 6.90 0.05 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Protocatechuic acid 5.09 0.02 17.38 0.03 8.88 0.04 47.89 0.16 42.13 0.12 18.31 0.06 20.02 0.16 36.81 0.11 6.99 0.05 22.41 0.06 29.82 0.32 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± 4-Hydroxy-benzoic acid 10.04 0.02 18.01 0.23 7.73 0.03 a 13.2 0.10 33.12 0.18 6.05 0.02 15.36 0.10 7.72 0.03 a 19.13 0.14 22.95 0.09 4.95 0.03 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Vanillic acid 8.81 0.03 6.88 0.04 9.11 0.02 2.03 0.02 6.54 0.03 7.04 0.13 4.20 0.06 3.08 0.07 0.95 0.01 6.34 0.02 a 6.41 0.01 a ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Chlorogenic acid 6.85 0.06 5.12 0.03 1.39 0.21 6.69 0.01 3.06 0.02 a 5.33 0.01 4.03 0.06 1.23 0.01 1.94 0.02 2.45 0.01 3.11 0.01 a

100g dm) ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± / Caﬀeic acid 17.75 0.04 48.92 0.02 62.85 0.03 a 126.78 0.05 133.42 0.01 42.38 0.01 36.39 0.01 115.19 0.21 62.70 0.58 a 51.43 0.05 18.97 0.08 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± p-coumaric acid n.d 3.47 0.01 n.d 0.79 0.01 1.12 0.01 0.81 0.04 0.90 0.01 2.50 0.01 0.20 0.01 0.54 0.01 0.40 0.02 Phenolic acids (mg ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Ferulic acid 13.60 0.03 28.90 0.02 9.92 0.03 33.50 0.02 18.07 0.06 18.96 0.1 9.70 0.01 16.00 0.07 24.49 0.03 19.96 0.08 6.87 0.02 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Sinapic acid 32.00 0.08 19.08 0.02 n.d 14.91 0.01 n.d 10.01 0.02 n.d 22.94 0.02 n.d 15.29 0.08 21.58 0.02 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Rutin 51.92 0.03 8.07 0.01 19.90 0.02 30.28 0.06 15.92 0.01 12.10 0.03 a 21.59 0.02 14.05 0.56 6.30 0.02 5.09 0.01 12.10 0.02 a ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Kaempferol n.d 28.94 0.07 13.10 0.02 20.79 0.01 n.d 15.09 0.01 n.d 7.11 0.02 n.d 13.02 0.05 6.20 0.02 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Isoquercetin 5.54 0.02 5.69 0.01 1.63 0.01 4.11 0.01 9.01 0.09 6.04 0.03 n.d 3.86 0.01 5.33 0.01 4.68 0.17 n.d ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ±

100 g dm) Astragalin 28.03 0.11 n.d n.d 26.82 0.02 11.39 0.03 15.35 0.03 n.d n.d 5.40 0.01 12.07 0.03 n.d / ± ± ± ± ± ± Myricetin 9.04 0.01 1.99 0.02 n.d n.d 1.74 0.01 6.23 0.01 4.00 0.02 3.83 0.03 n.d n.d 5.04 0.04 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Flavonols (mg Quercetin 6.97 0.07 2.55 0.02 26.54 0.02 15.69 0.07 11.03 0.05 18.81 0.07 5.09 0.01 n.d 13.31 0.02 8.10 0.01 15.21 0.02 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± a means in the same verse followed by the same letter do not signiﬁcantly diﬀer (p < 0.05) in terms of analysed variables, dm—dry mass, n.d—not detected, the results are expressed as the mean values standard deviation of the triplicate samples. ± Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 8 of 19

Dragovic-Uzelac et al. observed chlorogenic acid (15.59–23.05 mg/kg) in all pumpkin cultivars under study [29]. This content was similar to the one measured in the cultivars analyzed in our study: ‘Gomez’ (1.39 mg/100 g), ‘Jarrahdale’ (1.94 mg/100 g) and ‘Marina di Chioggia’ (2.45 mg/100 g). All the cultivars contained syringic acid (19.56–27.13 mg/kg) (Dragovic-Uzelac et al., 2005). Two cultivars, i.e., ‘Turkinja’ (C. maxima Duchesne) and ‘Argenta’ (C. moschata) contained small amounts of caffeic acid (1.05 and 2.33 mg/kg, respectively), which were smaller than the content of caffeic acid measured in all the cultivars analyzed in our experiment. Only the ‘Argenta’ cultivar contained p-coumaric acid (1.27 mg/kg). This acid was identified in nearly all the cultivars in our study, except ‘Bambino’ and ‘Gomez’. Zdunic et al. identified eight polyphenolic compounds in pumpkin fruit (C. maxima Duchesne): protocatechuic acid, chlorogenic acid, salicylic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, p-coumaric acid, hesperidin, vanillin, and eriodictyol-7-neohesperidoside [30]. The researchers found that the total content of polyphenols amounted to 905.9 µg/g. Biesiada et al. [31] measured the highest content of phenolic compounds in the following pumpkin cultivars: ‘Amazonka’ (C. maxima Duchesne, 29.82 mg/100 g), ‘Jet F1’ (C. pepo L., 24.90 mg/100 g), and ‘Junona’ (C. pepo L, 23.10 mg/100 g). The smallest content of these compounds was identified in the ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ (C. maxima Duchesne, 14.75 mg/100 g), ‘Ambar’ (C. maxima Duchesne, 18.05 mg/100 g) and ‘Pyza’ cultivars (C. pepo L, 18.18 mg/100 g) [31]. Telesiński et al. observed that there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the total content of polyphenols and flavonoids between pumpkin cultivars (‘Kurinishiki F1’, ‘Butternut Rugosa’, ‘Muscade de Provence’, ‘Muskatna’) of the C. moschata species [32]. The authors proved that the ‘Kurinishiki F1’ cultivar had the highest content of total polyphenols (998.63 mg/kg), whereas the ‘Muscade de Provence’ cultivar contained the smallest amount of these compounds (737.02 mg/kg). The ‘Kurinishiki F1’ cultivar also had the highest content of total flavonoids (725.29 mg/kg). The lowest content of total flavonoids was measured in the ‘Butternut Rugosa’ cultivar (548.36 mg/kg). Altemimi et al. found that pumpkin fruit contained ellagic acid (2.96 µg/g) and myricetin (2.95 µg/g) [33]. The research results show that there was considerable diversity between the cultivars in their content of minerals (Table3). The highest content of potassium was found in the ‘Bambino’ cultivar (9965.7 mg/100 g). The concentration of this mineral was slightly different in the ‘Jumbo Pink Banana’ (8306.43 mg/100 g) and ‘Marina di Chioggia’ cultivars (7441.2 mg/100 g). The following cultivars were the most abundant in calcium: ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ (264.89 mg/100 g), ‘Marina di Chioggia’ (241.91 mg/100 g), ‘Jumbo Pink Banana’ (228.6 mg/100 g) and ‘Porcelain Doll’ (217.01 mg/100 g). The smallest amount of calcium was found in the ‘Hokkaido’ cultivar (92.12 mg/100 g). There was a high content of magnesium measured in the ‘Bambino’ (135.35 mg/100 g) and ‘Marina di Chioggia’ cultivars (127.91 mg/100 g). The largest amounts of copper and manganese were measured in the Bambino’ cultivar (0.59 mg/100 g and 0.86 mg/100 g, respectively). The highest concentrations of iron and zinc were measured in the ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ cultivar (2.67 mg/100 g and 1.33 mg/100 g, respectively). The content of sodium in the pumpkin cultivars ranged from 226.16 to 370.40 mg/100 g. The highest content was found in the ‘Porcelain Doll’ cultivar, whereas the lowest content was measured in the ‘Buttercup’ cultivar. The data provided by the United States Department of Agriculture Food Composition Databases (USDA, 2015) indicate that potassium is the most abundant mineral in pumpkin. This statement is in agreement with the results of our study. The content of potassium varied between the cultivars as follows: ‘Butternut’ (352 mg/100 g), ‘Hubbard’ (320 mg/100 g), ‘Spaghetti’ (108 mg/100 g) [34]. Blessing et al. also noted low amounts of iron, calcium, and phosphorus in their study [35]. The contents of these elements ranged from 0.0069 to 0.136 mg/100 g (iron), from 0.461 to 0.610 mg/100 g (calcium), and from 0.145 to 1.093 mg/100 g (phosphorus) [35]. Elinge et al. analyzed the content of minerals in pumpkin seeds and found that like in pumpkin pulp, potassium was the most abundant element (237.24 mg/100 g) [36]. Apart from that, pumpkin seeds contained relatively large amounts of sodium (170.35 mg/100 g), magnesium (67.41 mg/100 g) and zinc (14.14 mg/100 g). They also contained small amounts of iron (3.75 mg/100 g), calcium (9.78 mg/100 g) and manganese (0.06 mg/100 g). Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 9 of 19

Table 3. The content of mineral compounds and vitamins in pumpkin varieties.

Melonowa Porcelain Jumbo Pink Marina di Green Cultivars Bambino Hokkaido Gomez Blue Kuri Buttercup Jarrahdale Z˙ ółta Doll Banana Chioggia Hubbard K 9965.70 0.78 6009.50 1.16 4692.70 1.55 5035.02 0.82 6405.02 0.26 6228.04 1.57 4959.03 0.72 8306.43 1.77 5284.03 1.97 7441.20 2.63 5986.73 3.58 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Ca 106.92 0.10 92.12 0.19 119.08 0.17 264.89 0.59 217.01 0.97 193.74 0.48 169.61 2.05 228.60 0.74 190.11 1.53 241.91 1.74 128.70 1.28 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Mg 135.35 0.08 80.03 0.03 a 111.11 0.19 105.64 0.81 96.25 0.42 b 79.97 2.18 a 96.70 1.21 b 113.00 1.19 101.16 0.21 127.91 1.39 85.63 0.71 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Na 299.33 0.20 292.41 0.42 243.07 1.35 229.94 1.51 370.40 1.88 317.24 1.77 a 226.16 2.12 259.01 0.58 240.04 1.85 317.84 0.43 a 329.76 2.59 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Fe 1.82 0.01 1.55 0.01 1.06 0.01 2.67 0.03 2.25 0.02 a 1.13 0.01 2.22 0.01 a 2.40 0.02 2.10 0.02 2.21 0 a 1.30 0.01 ± ± ± ± ± ± a ± ± a ± ± ±

100g dm) Zn 1.04 0.01 1.05 0.01 0.84 0.02 1.33 0.01 0.89 0.01 0.87 0.01 0.95 0.01 0.87 0.02 1.13 0.01 1.18 0.01 0.79 0.01 / ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Cu 0.59 0.01 0.25 0.01 a 0.52 0.02 0.39 0.01 b 0.28 0.01 ac 0.44 0.01 0.32 0.01 cd 0.29 0.01 acd 0.27 0.01 ac 0.40 0.06 b 0.32 0.01 cd

Mineral compounds (mg ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Mn 0.86 0.02 0.34 0.01 0.47 0.02 a 0.65 0.02 0.90 0.01 0.48 0.01 ab 0.52 0.01 0.55 0.01 0.49 0.01 b 0.74 0.01 0.81 0.01 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Vitamin C 62.18 0.88 a 49.16 0.77 b 65.17 1.83 c 84.23 1.78 71.84 1.56 63.67 1.77 ac 49.06 0.35 b 60.02 1.72 a 80.94 1.44 52.28 1.22 60.23 2.51 a (mg/100 g dm) ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Vitamin B1 0.29 0.02 0.60 0.01 0.42 0.02 a 0.27 0.01 0.25 0.01 0.15 0.01 0.23 0.01 0.54 0.02 0.52 0.02 0.34 0.01 0.42 0.02 a (mg/100 g dm) ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Folates 52.10 1.84 a 22.46 0.49 38.82 1.30 50.99 1.45 a 48.26 0.87 42.04 0.75 b 28.28 0.77 43.31 0.68 b 20.44 0.59 65.04 0.88 33.74 1.81 (µg/100 g dm) ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± a, b, c—means in the same verse followed by the same letters do not signiﬁcantly diﬀer (p < 0.05) in terms of analyzed variables, K—potassium, Ca—calcium, Mg—magnesium, Na—sodium, Fe—iron, Zn—zinc, Cu—copper, Mn—manganese, dm—dry mass, the results are expressed as the mean values standard deviation of the triplicate samples. ± Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 10 of 19

There were statistically significant differences in the content of vitamins between the pumpkin cultivars (Table3). The highest content of vitamin C was found in the ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ cultivar (84.23 mg/100 g). There were slightly smaller amounts of this vitamin in the ‘Jarrahdale’ (80.94 mg/100 g) and ‘Porcelain Doll’ cultivars (71.84 mg/100 g). The lowest concentration of vitamin C was measured in the ‘Hokkaido’ (49.16 mg/100 g) and ‘Buttercup’ cultivars (49.06 mg/100 g). The highest amounts of thiamine were found in the ‘Hokkaido’ (0.6 mg/100 g), ‘Jumbo Pink Banana’ (0.54 mg/100 g) and ‘Jarrahdale’ cultivars (0.52 mg/100 g). The smallest amount of vitamin B1 was measured in the ‘Blue Kuri’ cultivar (0.15 mg/100 g). There was only one form of folates in the samples, i.e., 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5CH3FH4). There was no tetrahydrofolate (FH4) or 5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid (5-HCO-FH4). The highest concentration of folates was measured in the ‘Marina di Chioggia’ (65.04 0.88 µg/100 g), ± ‘Bambino’ (52.10 µg/100 g) and ‘Melonowa Z˙ ółta’ cultivars (50.99 µg/100 g). The lowest content of these compounds was found in the ‘Jarrahdale’ (20.44 µg/100 g) and ‘Hokkaido’ cultivars (22.46 µg/100 g). The content of vitamin C in different pumpkin cultivars was analyzed in a few studies. Assous et al. [37] found that the pumpkin of the C. moschata species contained L-ascorbic acid (33.81 mg/100 g of fresh weight). The content was smaller than in our study (49.16–80.94 mg/100 g of dry mass). Offor et al. noted a low concentration of this compound (4.93 mg/100 g), which was similar to that of cabbage (4.40 mg/100 g) [38]. Nawirska-Olszańskaet al. observed that the content of vitamin C in the ‘Karowita’ pumpkin cultivar (C. maxima Duchesne) amounted to 14.12 mg/100 g [39]. Biesiada et al. [31] observed considerable diversity between the cultivars in their content of ascorbic acid. The highest concentration of this compound was measured in the following cultivars: ‘Ambar’ (42.48 mg/100 g), ‘Amazonka’ (34.97 mg/100 g), ‘Karowita’ (29.18 mg/100 g), and ‘Bambino’ (26.05 mg/100 g). The ‘Jet F1’, ‘Junona’ and ‘Miranda’ cultivars contained small amounts of ascorbic acid, i.e., 10.80, 9.22, and 5.54 mg/100 g, respectively. The study also proved that the content of this compound decreased as the storage time increased. After 90 days of storage, the concentration of vitamin C dropped by about 40–50%. Sharma and Rao [40] proved that the content of vitamin C differed according to the phase of maturity. The longer the maturity period was, the more ascorbic acid was found. The content of ascorbic acid in young fruits was 4.30 mg/100 g, whereas fully mature fruits contained 15.00 mg/100 g. The data provided by the USDA [34] also indicated differences between cultivars in the content of vitamin C. The content of vitamin C in the ‘Butternut’ cultivar amounted to 21.0 mg/100 g. The concentration of ascorbic acid in other cultivars was lower, i.e., 11.0 mg/100 g (‘Acorn’, ‘Hubbard’) and 2.1 mg/100 g (‘Spaghetti’). The highest content of thiamine was measured in the ‘Acorn’ (0.140 mg/100 g) and ‘Butternut’ cultivars (0.100 mg/100 g). There were smaller amounts of vitamin B1 in the ‘Hubbard’ (0.070 mg/100 g) and ‘Spaghetti’ cultivars (0.037 mg/100 g). The largest number of folates was found in the ‘Butternut’ cultivar (27 µg/100 g), whereas the smallest amount was noted in the ‘Spaghetti’ cultivar (12 µg/100 g) [34].

2.2. Correlation of Bioactive Compounds Content of Different C. maxima Duchesne Varieties The correlation analysis indicated a wide range of dependencies between the contents of individual compounds exhibiting antioxidative properties (Table4). The concentrations of phenolic acids and iron exhibited the strongest positive correlation (r = 0.68, p < 0.001). The high concentration of iron was also related to the high content of zinc and manganese (r = 0.45, p < 0.05). There were also high values of the correlation coefficients between the content of tocopherols and carotenoids (r = 0.50, p < 0.01) as well as between the content of tocopherols and flavonols (r = 0.50, p < 0.01). There was a strong positive correlation between the concentration of flavonols and the content of copper (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). There were negative correlations between the content of phenolic acids and copper (r = 0.42, p < 0.05) − and between the content of tocopherols and manganese (r = 0.41, p < 0.05). There were no statistically − significant correlations between the content of vitamin C and the other compounds analyzed in the study. It can be assumed that both positive and negative correlations between the content of the bioactive compound may result from their antioxidative and prooxidative activity. Bioactive compounds have a certain synergistic effect in terms of antioxidant properties and thereby prevent their Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 11 of 19 Molecules 2018, 23, x FOR PEER REVIEW 14 of 22 reduction.2.3. Cluster However, Analysis the high content of antioxidants may also intensify prooxidative modifications leading to the destruction of the bioactive compounds structure. We conducted cluster analysis to identify pumpkin cultivars according to the content of 2.3.bioactive Cluster compounds. Analysis We assumed that the groups identified in the analysis should differ according to the most determinative variables. We conducted hierarchical cluster analysis using Ward’s method.We conducted The number cluster of groups analysis and tothe identify cultivars pumpkin belonging cultivars to these accordinggroups were to identified the content according of bioactive compounds.to a dendrogram We assumed (Figure 2). that There the groupswere two identified clearly different in the analysis groups shouldof cultivars diff eridentified according according to the most determinativeto bioactive variables.compound We contents: conducted Cluster hierarchical 1 (n = 3):cluster 'Bambino', analysis 'Jumbo using Ward’s Pink Banana','Marina method. The number di ofChioggia', groups and Cluster the cultivars 2 (n = belonging 8): 'Hokkaido', to these 'Gomez', groups 'Melonowa were identified żółta', according 'Blue Kuri', to 'Buttercup', a dendrogram (Figure'Jarrahdale',2). There 'Green were Hubbard', two clearly 'Porcelain di ff erentDoll'. Next, groups the of groups cultivars were identifiedanalyzed with according Student's to t-tests bioactive compoundfor independent contents: samples Cluster to 1 identify(n = 3): ‘Bambino’, the variables ‘Jumbo causing Pink differences Banana’,‘Marina between di the Chioggia’, groups. Cluster The 2 (nanalysis= 8): ‘Hokkaido’, revealed (Table ‘Gomez’, 5) that ‘Melonowa there were ˙zó statisticallyłta’, ‘Blue Kuri’, significant ‘Buttercupi’, differences ‘Jarrahdale’, between the ‘Green groups Hubbard’, in ‘Porcelainthe content Doll’. of sinapic Next, acid, the groups quercetin, were potassium, analyzed magnesium, with Student’s iron, t-testsvitamin for C, independentand folates. The samples first to identifygroup the contained variables statistically causing di largerfferences amounts between of sinapicthe groups. acid The (23.41 analysis vs 8.2 revealed mg/100 (Table g), potassium5) that there were(8,571.11 statistically vs 5,575 significant mg/100 g), dimagnesiumfferences between(125.42 vs. the 94.56 groups mg/100 in theg), iron content (2.14 of vs sinapic 1.78 mg/100 acid, g) quercetin, and potassium,folates (53.48 magnesium, vs 35.63 µg/100 iron, g). vitamin The other C, group and folates. contained The larger first amounts group contained of quercetin statistically (13.53 vs 5.02 larger mg/100 g) and vitamin C (65.54 vs 58.16 mg/100 g). There were no statistically significant differences amounts of sinapic acid (23.41 vs 8.2 mg/100 g), potassium (8571.11 vs 5575 mg/100 g), magnesium between the groups in the other variables. (125.42 vs. 94.56 mg/100 g), iron (2.14 vs 1.78 mg/100 g) and folates (53.48 vs 35.63 µg/100 g). The other group contained larger amounts of quercetin (13.53 vs 5.02 mg/100 g) and vitamin C (65.54 vs 58.16 mg/100 g). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the other variables.

FigureFigure 2. Dendrogram of of studied studied pumpkin pumpkin varieties varieties division. division.

Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 12 of 19

Table 4. Results of the correlation analysis between the contents of selected compounds with antioxidant properties.

Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of Compound Vitamin C Fe Zn Cu Mn Carotenoids Phenolic Acids Tocopherols Flavonols Sum of carotenoids - -0.03 0.50 ** 0.21 0.12 0.00 0.08 0.17 0.01 − Sum of phenolic acids 0.03 - 0.23 0.07 0.33 0.68 *** 0.43 * 0.42 * 0.06 − − − Sum of tocopherols 0.50 ** 0.23 - 0.50 ** 0.04 0.18 0.05 0.43* 0.41 * − − Sum of ﬂavonols 0.21 0.07 0.50 ** - 0.34 0.22 0.16 0.65 *** 0.13 − − Vitamin C 0.12 0.33 0.04 0.34 - 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.17 Fe 0.00 0.68 *** 0.18 0.22 0.14 - 0.50 ** 0.31 0.45 * − − − Zn 0.08 0.43 * 0.05 0.16 0.13 0.50 ** - 0.14 0.03 − − Cu 0.17 0.42 * 0.43 * 0.65 *** 0.13 0.31 0.14 - 0.15 − − − Mn 0.01 0.06 0.41 * 0.13 0.17 0.45 * 0.03 0.15 - − p < 0.05 *, p < 0.01 **, p < 0.001 ***—determination of statistically signiﬁcant correlations between tested variables. Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 13 of 19

Table 5. Variable levels divided into groups of pumpkin varieties.

Compound Cluster 1 Cluster 2

Zeaxanthin 61.42 16.19 77.09 52.84 ± ± Lutein 159.87 40.36 165.58 97.21 ± ± β-carotene 78.68 24.66 64.99 25.99 ± ± Retinol equivalent 31.55 8.46 31.05 16.00 Carotenoids ± ± Gallic acid 7.94 5.71 10.82 4.07 ± ± Protocatechuic acid 21.44 13.76 23.93 14.19 ± ± 4-Hydroxy-benzoic acid 13.57 7.11 14.69 8.78 ± ± Vanillic acid 6.08 2.49 5.40 2.64 ± ± Chlorogenic acid 3.51 2.56 3.83 1.72 ± ± Caffeic acid 61.46 42.86 66.55 39.88 ± ± p-coumaric acid 1.01 1.14 0.96 1.03 Phenolic acids ± ± Ferulic acid 16.52 2.78 18.80 9.24 ± ± Sinapic acid 23.41 7.24 * 8.20 8.95 * ± ± α-tocopherol 3.48 1.45 4.32 1.88 ± ± γ-tocopherol 4.25 1.60 5.08 4.96 ± ± α-tocopherol equivalent 3.91 1.29 4.83 2.33 Tocopherols ± ± Rutin 23.69 21.53 15.78 7.55 ± ± Kaempferol 6.71 5.65 10.52 10.36 ± ± Isoquercetin 4.70 0.73 3.97 3.05 ± ± Astragalin 13.37 12.18 7.37 9.41 ± ± Flavonols Myricetin 4.29 3.93 2.37 2.34 ± ± Quercetin 5.02 3.80 * 13.53 7.25 * ± ± Potassium (K) 8571.11 1111.02 * 5575.00 626.36 * ± ± Calcium (Ca) 192.48 64.43 171.91 54.20 ± ± Magnesium (Mg) 125.42 9.90 * 94.56 11.17 * ± ± Sodium (Na) 292.06 26.06 281.13 51.79 ± ± Iron (Fe) 2.14 0.26 * 1.78 0.58 * ± ± Zinc (Zn) 1.03 0.14 0.98 0.17 ± ± Copper (Cu) 0.43 0.14 0.35 0.09 ± ± Mineral compounds Manganese (Mn) 0.72 0.14 0.58 0.18 ± ± Vitamin C 58.16 4.65 * 65.54 12.57 * ± ± Vitamin B1 0.39 0.11 0.36 0.15 ± ± Folates 53.48 9.53 * 35.63 10.92 * Vitamins ± ± p < 0.05 *—the presence of significant differences between the groups of varieties, the results are expressed as the mean values standard deviation of the triplicate samples, the results are expressed in the following units: carotenoids (µg/g± dm), phenolic acids, tocopherols, flavonols, mineral compounds (mg/100 g dm), vitamins: C and B1 (mg/100 g dm), folates (µg/100 g dm).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Reagents Analytical standards (Zeaxanthin, Lutein, β-carotene, Gallic acid, Protocatechuic acid, 4-Hydroxy-benzoic acid, Vanillic acid, Chlorogenic acid, Caﬀeic acid, p-coumaric acid, Ferulic acid, Sinapic acid, Rutin, Kaempferol, Isoquercetin, Astragalin, Myricetin, Quercetin, α-tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, δ-tocopherol, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, tetrahydrofolate, 5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid, l-ascorbic acid) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Poznan, Poland). 10-formylfolic acid and pteroyltri-γ-L-glutamic acid were obtained from Schirck’s Laboratories (Jona, Switzerland). α-amylase obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Poznan, Poland) and γ-glutamyl hydrolase obtained from rat blood plasma (Europa Bioproducts Ltd., Cambridge, UK). Other reagents (acetonitrile, triethylamine, ethyl acetate, pyrogallol, ethanol, potassium hydroxide, orthophosphoric acid, methanol, nitric acid, lanthanum chloride, potassium dihydrogen phosphate) were purchased from Merck (Warsaw, Poland). Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 14 of 19

3.2. Sample Collection and Preparation Material for the study were 11 fruit varieties of C. maxima Duchesne (‘Bambino’, ‘Hokkaido’, ‘Jumbo Pink Banana’, ‘Gomez’, ‘Marina di Chioggia’, ‘Melonowa ˙zółta’, ‘Blue Kuri’, ‘Buttercupi’, ‘Jarrahdale’, ‘Green Hubbard’, ‘Porcelain Doll’), which were purchased at the Cooperative of organic farming products ‘Dolina Mogilnicy’ (Wolkowo, Poland). Material for the study were 11 fruit varieties of C. maxima Duchesne (‘Bambino’, ‘Hokkaido’, ‘Jumbo Pink Banana’, ‘Gomez’, ‘Marina di Chioggia’, ‘Melonowa ˙zółta’, ‘Blue Kuri’, ‘Buttercupi’, ‘Jarrahdale’, ‘Green Hubbard’, ‘Porcelain Doll’), which were purchased at the Cooperative of organic farming products ‘Dolina Mogilnicy’ in Wolkowo, Poland. Geographic coordinates of this location are 52◦9023.2700 N, 16◦30010.6900 E. The meteorological data of this location is temperature: 8.9 ◦C, wind velocity: 3.0 m/s, relative humidity: 78.0%, total annual rainfall—515 mm. During the cultivation of plants, standard care treatments were performed (irrigation, weeding, soil loosening). Pumpkins were collected in October 2016. After harvesting, the fruit was delivered to the laboratory and processed immediately. After washing and cleaning, edible parts (pulp) of the fruit were cut into small pieces and then were freeze-dried (HETO). The dried samples were stored at room temperature, without air and light, until used for further analysis.

3.3. Carotenoid Content Analysis Carotenoids were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography HPLC (with a PDA 2998 detector (Waters). A column RP-18 ODS2 (250 4.6 mm, 5 µm) was used. Elution was performed × using solvent A (80% acetonitrile with 0.05% trimethylamine), and B (ethyl acetate). A gradient applied was: 65% A:35% B at 35 min., in the next 25 min. up to 50% A:50% B, and then this ratio was maintained in the isocratic system for another 5 min at a flow of 1.0 mL/min. Recordings were performed at a wavelength λ = 450 nm. The identification of compounds was based on spectra in the range from 200 to 600 nm and retention times compared to standards. The concentrations of carotenoids were calculated from the previously prepared calibration curve. In order to determine carotenoid samples were saponified. A sample was weighed into round bottom flasks, followed by addition of pyrogallol, anhydrous ethanol, and potassium hydroxide. After heating the sample, 1% sodium chloride was added, then the sample was cooled and hexane with ethyl acetate was added. After shaking, saturated sodium chloride solution was added. From the upper layer (unsaponifiable matter) volume of 20 mL was collected in a round bottom flask, and the solvent was removed by rotary vacuum evaporator. Then the sample was quantitatively transferred with 2 mL of ethyl acetate to the chromatography vials [41]. Results were expressed as microgram of each carotenoid per gram of dry mass. The retinol equivalent (RA) was calculated according to the following formula: 1 µg retinol equivalent (RA) = 6 µg beta-carotene + 12 µg other carotenoids [42].

3.4. Phenolic Compounds Analysis Quantitative and qualitative analysis of phenolic acids and flavonols in the pumpkin cultivars tested was made using the HPLC technique (Agilent) with an Infinity Bin Pump DAD 1290 detector. The Zorbax SB C18 (3.9 150 mm, 5 µm) column was used to determine the free phenolic acids. × A non-linear concentration gradient was used in the system: water acidified with orthophosphoric acid (pH 2.7), acetonitrile with water (1:1 v/v), using a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. The gradient program started with 100% acidified water and ended with 50% acetonitrile at the 52nd minute of the separation. 10 µL of the sample was injected prior filtration (0.45 µm pore size filter). The identification of the compounds was based on the analysis of standard phenolic acids dissolved in methanol. Identification of individual phenolic acids based on a comparison of the UV-VIS spectra and the acid retention time in samples with the standards determined at λ = 260 and λ = 310 nm. During the flavonols content determination, a non-linear concentration gradient was applied in the system: water acidified with orthophosphoric acid (pH 2.7), acetonitrile with water (1:1 v/v), using a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The gradient program started in the 1st minute from 95% acidified water and it decreased to 20% at the 30th minute [43]. Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 15 of 19

Identification of compounds was performed by comparing their retention times with retention times of the available standards (astragalin, isoquercetin, kaempferol, quercetin, rutin, myrycetin, chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, gallic acid, caffeic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, p-coumaric acid, protocatechic acid, sinapic acid, vanillic acid) obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Poznań,Poland. The content of phenolics in the samples was determined based on prepared calibration curves. Results were expressed as milligram of each polyphenol compound per 100 g of dry mass.

3.5. Tocopherols Content Analysis The tested samples were subjected to saponification. Next, the sample was injected from the upper layer (unsaponifiable substances) for injection by HPLC. Tocopherols were identified qualitatively and quantitatively by HPLC liquid chromatography (Waters 600 Asc. Milford, MA, USA) in a system consisting of a pump Waters 600, column LiChrosorb Si 60 (200 4.6 mm, 5 µm, Merck, Darmstadt, × Germany) and fluorimetric detector (Waters 474 Asc. Milford MA, USA). The mobile phase was a mixture of n-hexane with 1,4-dioxane (96:4 v/v). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. Detector was set at excitation λ = 290 nm and emission λ = 330 nm. The concentration of individual tocopherols homologues was calculated on the basis of a previously performed calibration curve [44]. Results were expressed as milligram of each tocopherol per 100 g of dry mass.

3.6. Mineral Composition Analysis Determination of mineral components content (Ca, Mg, Mn, Fe, Zn, Cu) was carried out with the atomic-absorption spectrometry method (F-AAS), for the Na and K determination, the atomic-emission spectrometry method was used (F-AES) [45], using the AAS-3 spectrometer (Carl-Zeiss Jena, Germany). To determine the content of minerals, approx. 1 g of the sample was weighed in triplicate. The samples were subjected to prior wet mineralization using spectrally pure, concentrated 65% nitric acid in a closed system using a microwave oven MARS 5 (CEM, USA). The obtained mineralisates were diluted with 1 mol/dm3 HNO3 or 0.3% lanthanum chloride (for Ca and Mg). In the present study, Soya Bean Flour INCTSBF-4 was used as reference material. Results were expressed as milligram of each mineral compound per 100 g of dry mass.

3.7. Vitamin C Content Analysis Separation and identification of vitamin C in tested samples were performed using HPLC high-performance liquid chromatograph (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a detector Infinity Bin Pump DAD 1290. Luna Phenomenex (4.6 250 mm, 5 µm) columns were used to separate tested × compound. The mobile phase was a mixture of potassium dihydrogen phosphate (Ph = 5,0) and methanol. The volume of injected sample was 20 µL. A gradient from 95% of the potassium dihydrogen phosphate mixture was used in 1 min. up to 78% in 6 min. Identification of vitamin C was based on a comparison of the UV-VIS spectrum and vitamin C retention time in the UV-VIS spectrum, and retention time of the standard. The content of ascorbic acid was determined at λ = 245 nm on the basis of a previously prepared calibration curve [46]. The vitamin C amount was expressed as ascorbic acid, and results were expressed as milligram of vitamin C per 100 g of dry mass.

3.8. Thiamine (Vitamin B1) Content Analysis The thiamine content was determined by using mimetic enzyme iron (III) tetrasulfonatophthalocyanine (FeTSPc). The method is based on the oxidation of thiamine in alkaline medium to give an intensively fluorescent compound [47]. Determination of thiamine content is based on fluorimetric measurement at excitation wavelength λ = 365 nm and using a secondary filter, with a maximum transmittance at a wavelength λ = 435 nm. Results were expressed as microgram of thiamine per 100 g of dry mass. Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 16 of 19

3.9. Folates Content Analysis Preparation of standards and enzymes. Standards (folic acid, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, tetrahydrofolate) were prepared according to the method described by Konings [48]. α-amylase (E.C. 3.2.1.1, A-6211) was dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), directly before the analysis. γ-glutamyl hydrolase was obtained from rat blood plasma (Europa Bioproducts Ltd., Cambridge). Extraction. A sample was weighed into the centrifuge tubes and 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.00) with 2% (w/v) ascorbic acid and 0.2% (v/v) 2-merkaptoethanol was added. The solution was intensively mixed and heated in a water bath at 100 ◦C for 15 min, then cooled in an ice bath to 20 ◦C, γ-glutamyl hydrolase and α-amylase were added. Subsequently, the samples were incubated at 37 ◦C for 4 h, then heated at 100 ◦C for 5 min, and cooled in an ice bath. Samples were centrifuged at 4 ◦C for 20 min. (12,000 rpm), and the supernatant was decanted into dark glass measuring flasks. 0.1 M phosphate buffer was added to the residual pellet in the tubes, shaken and centrifuged. The supernatant was decanted, and the volume of the flask was refilled with 0.1 M phosphate buffer and filtered. Samples purification. The samples were purified on Bakerbond spe J. T. columns (Baker 7091-03 (quaternary amine)). The separation of the folates was carried out on a liquid chromatograph (Shimadzu LC-10A) equipped with chromatographic column Phenomenex Synergi 4a Hydro-RP 80A (4 µm, 250 4.6 mm)[49]. Identification and calculation of folate content were made on the basis of a standard × with known folate content. Results were expressed as microgram of folates per 100 g of dry mass.

3.10. Statistical Analysis The results were statistically analyzed using STATISTICA 13.1 (StatSoft, Inc., Cracov, Poland). In order to determine statistically significant differences between varieties, an analysis of variance was made. Multiple comparisons analyses were performed using post-hoc tests NIR. The probability at p = 0.05 was assumed as the level of significance. Pearson’s linear correlation coefficients (p = 0.05, p = 0.01, p = 0.001) were calculated between the contents of each compound. A hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using the Ward method, by means of which the pumpkin varieties were grouped in terms of the content of the analyzed components.

4. Conclusions This study compared the chemical composition of the pulp of different pumpkin cultivars (C. maxima Duchesne) growing in Poland. So far there has been no study analyzing most of the pumpkin cultivars characterized in this article. Apart from that, there have been few studies analyzing the content of other bioactive compounds than carotenoids in pumpkin pulp. Our experiment had innovative character as it determined a broad profile of bioactive compounds in numerous pumpkin cultivars. The results extended the current knowledge and showed that the cultivars contained large amounts of individual carotenoids (β-carotene, lutein, and zeaxanthin). The cluster analysis confirmed that within one species of pumpkin (C. maxima Duchesne) for different varieties there are many significant differences in the content of the bioactive compound. The most significant differences were found for polyphenolic compounds (sinapic acid, quercetin), minerals (potassium, magnesium, iron) and vitamins (vitamin C, folates). These observations are confirmed by other researches. The main factor that may affect such discrepancies are the environmental conditions, mainly weather conditions, the climate zone, cultivation methods (eg fertilizer use, sowing and harvesting time), storage conditions for harvested pumpkins (temperature, time). The analyzed pumpkins were obtained from the same area, which allowed to limit the impact of various environmental conditions on the content of bioactive compounds. Comparing obtained results, it can be concluded that an important factor affecting the content of bioactive compounds in the pumpkin flesh is its genotype (genetic determinants). Such significant variability in the content of the chemical compound is very characteristic for plant materials. Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 17 of 19

Therefore, food composition databases (originating from different countries) are based only on average results from various studies. In addition, our research has shown that pumpkin (known for its carotenoids content) is also the source of many other bioactive compounds that have been proven for a health-promoting property. The food market is increasingly offering pumpkin in dried (powdered) form. The results of this study, calculated on a dry weight basis, show that the powdered form of pumpkin also contains many valuable ingredients for our health. Apart from that, the analysis proved considerable diversity between the cultivars in their content of flavonols, phenolic acids, tocopherols, minerals, and vitamins. Diverse bioactive compounds content presented in the tested pumpkin varieties indicates that choosing the right pumpkin variety for consumption significantly affects the number of nutrients supplied. The presence of polyphenols and carotenoids (mainly β-carotene) may probably enhance the antioxidant defense mechanism, preventing the harmful effects of free radicals, which cause many diseases, such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes, and cancer. Vitamin C contained in the pumpkin flesh can positively affect immunity and contribute to the increased absorption of iron from the diet. Pumpkin flesh contains high amounts of potassium, which is necessary for the proper functioning of the nervous system and muscles, and also helps to maintain normal blood pressure. The presence of vitamin B1 (thiamine) and B9 (folates) has also been found in pumpkin pulp, but they are present in small amounts, hence they should not be discussed in terms of health-promoting properties. The research results confirmed the high nutritional value of pumpkin and its usefulness for the production of functional food to enhance man health.

Author Contributions: B.K., conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, writing, review, and editing and A.G.-M., conceptualization, investigation, writing, editing, supervision, and funding acquisition. Funding: This research was funded by National Science Centre, Poland, grant number 2018/29/B/NZ9/00461. The publication co-financed within the framework of Ministry of Science and Higher Education program as “Regional Initiative Excellence” in years 2019–2022, project number 005/RID/2018/19. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Kimokoti, R.W.; Millen, B.E. Nutrition for the prevention of chronic diseases. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2016, 100, 1185–1198. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 2. Boeing, H.; Bechthold, A.; Bub, A.; Ellinger, S.; Haller, D.; Kroke, A.; Leschik-Bonnet, E.; Muller, M.J.; Oberritter, H.; Schulze, M.; et al. Critical review: Vegetables and fruit in the prevention of chronic diseases. Eur. J. Nutr. 2012, 51, 637–663. [CrossRef][PubMed] 3. Weaver, C.M. Bioactive foods and ingredients for health. Adv. Nutr. 2014, 5, 306S–311S. [CrossRef][PubMed] 4. Kulczyński,B.; Gramza-Michałowska, A.; Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Kmiecik, D. The role of carotenoids in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease—Current state of knowledge. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 38, 45–65. [CrossRef] 5. Sidor, A.; Dro˙zd˙zyńska,A.; Gramza-Michałowska, A. Black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) and its products as potential healthpromoting factors—An overview. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 89, 45–60. [CrossRef] 6. Kulczyński,B.; Gramza-Michałowska, A. The importance of selected spices in cardiovascular diseases (in Polish). Postepy Hig. Med. Dosw. 2016, 70, 1131–1141. [CrossRef] 7. Liu, R.H. Dietary bioactive compounds and their health implications. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78 (Suppl. S1), A18–A25. [CrossRef] 8. Gutierez, R.M.P. Review of Cucurbita pepo (pumpkin) its phytochemistry and pharmacology. Med. Chem. 2016, 6, 12–21. [CrossRef] 9. Saavedra, M.J.; Aires, A.; Dias, C.; Almeida, A.; De Vasconcelos, M.C.; Santos, P.; Rosa, E.A. Evaluation of the potential of squash pumpkin by-products (seeds and shell) as sources of antioxidant and bioactive compounds. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 1008–1015. [CrossRef] 10. Bardaa, S.; Halima, N.B.; Aloui, F.; Mansour, R.B.; Jabeur, H.; Bouaziz, M.; Sahnoun, Z. Oil from pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) seeds: Evaluation of its functional properties on wound healing in rats. Lipids Health Dis. 2016, 15, 73. [CrossRef] Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 18 of 19

11. Yadav, M.; Jain, S.; Tomar, R.; Prasad, G.B.; Yadav, H. Medicinal and biological potential of pumpkin: An updated review. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2010, 23, 184–190. [CrossRef][PubMed] 12. Balkaya, A.; Kandemir, D. An overview of winter squash (Cucurbita maxima Duch.) and pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.) growing in Turkey. Azarian J. Agric. 2015, 2, 57–64. 13. Kwiri, R.; Winini, C.; Musengi, A.; Mudyiwa, M.; Nyambi, C.; Muredzi, P.; Malunga, A. Proximate composition of pumpkin gourd (Cucurbita pepo) seeds from Zimbabwe. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 3, 279–283. [CrossRef] 14. Neđeral, S.; Petrović,M.; Vincek, D.; Pukec, D.; Škevin, D.; Kraljić,K.; Obranović,M. Variance of quality parameters and fatty acid composition in pumpkin seed oil during three crop seasons. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 60, 15–21. [CrossRef] 15. Le Roux, G.; Leborgne, I.; Labadie, M.; Garnier, R.; Sinno-Tellier, S.; Bloch, J.; Deguigne, M.; Boels, D. Poisoning by non-edible squash: Retrospective series of 353 patients from French Poison Control Centers. Clin. Toxicol. 2018, 56, 790–794. [CrossRef][PubMed] 16. Kim, M.Y.; Kim, E.J.; Kim, Y.-N.; Choi, C.; Lee, B.-H. Comparison of the chemical compositions and nutritive values of various pumpkin (Cucurbitaceae) species and parts. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2012, 6, 21–27. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 17. Ró˙zyło,R.; Gawlik-Dziki, U.; Dziki, R.; Jakubczyk, A.; Kara´s,M.; Ró˙zyło,K. Wheat bread with pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima L.) pulp as a functional food product. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2014, 52, 430–438. [CrossRef] 18. Białek, M.; Rutkowska, J.; Adamska, A.; Bajdalow, E. Partial replacement of wheat flour with pumpkin seed flour in muffins offered to children. CyTA J. Food 2016, 14, 391–398. [CrossRef] 19. Azevedo-Meleiro, C.H.; Rodriguez-Amaya, D.B. Qualitative and quantitative differences in carotenoid composition among Cucurbita moschata, Cucurbita maxima, and Cucurbita pepo. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 4027–4033. [CrossRef] 20. Gajewski, M.; Radzanowska, J.; Danilcenko, H.; Jariene, E.; Cerniauskiene, J. Quality of pumpkin cultivars in relation to sensory characteristics. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj Napoca 2008, 26, 73–79. 21. Kulaitiene, J.; Jariene, E.; Danilcenko, H.; Cerniauskiene, J.; Wawrzyniak, A.; Hamulka, J.; Jukneviciene, E. Chemical composition of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima D.) flesh flours used for food. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2014, 12, 61–64. 22. Norshazila, S.; Irwandi, J.; Othman, R.; Zuhanis, Y. Carotenoid content in different locality of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) in Malaysia. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 6, 29–32. 23. Seleim, M.A.A.; Ali, H.M.; Hassan, M.A.M. Comparative study of the beta-carotene, alpha-Tocopherol and pectin calues from three cultivars of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima). World J. Dairy Food Sci. 2015, 10, 132–140. 24. Cilla, A.; Bosch, L.; Barberá, R.; Alegría, A. Effect of processing on the bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds—A review focusing on carotenoids, minerals, ascorbic acid, tocopherols and polyphenols. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2018, 68, 3–15. [CrossRef] 25. Potoˇcnik,T.; Rak Cizej, M.; Jože Košir, I. Influence of seed roasting on pumpkin seed oil tocopherols, phenolics and antiradical activity. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2018, 69, 7–12. [CrossRef] 26. Jaswir, I.; Shahidan, N.; Othman, R.; Has-Yun Hashim, Y.Z.; Octavianti, F.; bin Salleh, M.N. Effects of season and storage period on accumulation of individual carotenoids in pumpkin flesh (Cucurbita moschata). J. Oleo Sci. 2014, 63, 761–767. [CrossRef][PubMed] 27. Stevenson, D.G.; Eller, F.J.; Wang, L.; Jane, J.L.; Wang, T.; Inglett, G.E. Oil and tocopherol content and composition of pumpkin seed oil in 12 cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 4005–4013. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 28. Ryan, E.; Galvin, K.; O’Connor, T.P.; Maguire, A.R.; O’Brien, N.M. Phytosterol, squalene, tocopherol content and fatty acid profile of selected seeds, grains, and legumes. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 2007, 62, 85–91. [CrossRef] 29. Dragovi-Uzelac, V.; Delonga, K.; Levaj, B.; Djakovic, S.; Pospisil, J. Phenolic profiles of raw apricots, pumpkins, and their purees in the evaluation of apricot nectar and jam authenticity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 4836–4842. [CrossRef] 30. Zdunic, G.M.; Menkovic, N.R.; Jadranin, M.B.; Novakovic, M.M.; Savikin, K.P.; Zivkovic, J.C. Phenolic compounds and carotenoids in pumpkin fruit and related traditional products. Hem. Ind. 2016, 70, 429–433. [CrossRef] 31. Biesiada, A.; Nawirska, A.; Kucharska, A.; Sokół-Ł˛etowska,A. Chemical composition of pumpkin fruit depending on cultivar and storage. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 2011, 18, 9–18. Molecules 2019, 24, 3212 19 of 19

32. Telesiński,A.; Płatkowski, M.; Jadczak, D. Wła´sciwo´sciprzeciwutleniaj ˛aceowoców wybranych odmian dyni pi˙zmowej(Cucurbita moschata duch). Bromatol. Chem. Toksykol. 2014, 47, 150–154. 33. Altemimi, A.; Watson, D.G.; Kinsel, M.; Lightfoot, D.A. Simultaneous extraction, optimization, and analysis of flavonoids and polyphenols from peach and pumpkin extracts using a TLC-densitometric method. Chem. Cent. J. 2015, 9, 39. [CrossRef] 34. USDA Agricultural Research Service. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. Available online: http://www.ars.usda.gov/ba/bhnrc/ndl (accessed on 14 February 2019). 35. Blessing, A.C.; Ifeanyi, U.M.; Chijioke, O.B. Nutritional evaluation of some nigerian pumpkins (Cucurbita spp.). Fruit Veg. Cereal Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 5, 64–71. 36. Ellinge, C.M.; Muhammad, A.; Atiku, F.A.; Itodo, A.U.; Peni, I.J.; Sanni, O.M.; Mbongo, A.N. Proximate, mineral and anti-nutrient composition of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) seeds extract. Int. J. Plant Res. 2012, 2, 146–150. 37. Assous, M.T.M.; Soheir Saad, E.M.; Dyab, A.S. Enhancement of quality attributes of canned pumpkin and pineapple. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2014, 59, 9–15. [CrossRef] 38. Offor, C.E.; Okechukwu, U.; Esther, A. Determination of ascorbic acid contents of fruits and vegetables. Int. J. Pharm. Med. Sci. 2015, 5, 1–3. 39. Nawirska-Olszańska,A.; Biesiada, A.; Sokół-Ł˛etowska,A.; Kucharska, A.Z. Content of bioactive compound and antioxidant capacity of pumpkin puree enriched with japanese quience, cornelian cherry, strawberry and apples. Acta Sci. Polon. Technol. Aliment. 2011, 10, 51–60. 40. Sharma, S.; Ramana Rao, T.V.Nutritional quality characteristics of pumpkin fruit as revealed by its biochemical analysis. Int. Food Res. J. 2013, 20, 2309–2316. 41. Chilczuk, B.; Perucka, I.; Materska, M.; Buczkowska, H. Zawarto´sćluteiny, zeaksantyny i β-karotenu w liofilizowanych owocach wybranych odmian Cucurbita maxima D. Zywn.˙ Nauka Technol. Jako´sć 2014, 2, 93. 42. Debelo, H.; Novotny, J.A.; Ferruzzi, M.G. Vitamin, A. Adv. Nutr. 2017, 8, 992–994. [CrossRef][PubMed] 43. Kobus, J.; Flaczyk, E.; Siger, A.; Nogala-Kałucka, M.; Korczak, J.; Pegg, R.B. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of extracts of Ginkgo leaves. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2009, 111, 1140–1150. [CrossRef] 44. Ryynänen, M.; Lampi, A.M.; Salo-Väänänen, P.; Ollilainen, V.; Piironen, V. A small-scale sample preparation method with HPLC analysis for determination of tocopherols and tocotrienols in cereals. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2004, 17, 749–765. [CrossRef] 45. Bader, N.R. Sample preparation for flame atomic absorption spectroscopy: An overview. Rasayan J. Chem. 2011, 4, 49–55. 46. Gliszczyńska-Swigło,A.; Ciska, E.; Pawlak-Lemańska,K.; Chmielewski, J.; Borkowski, T. The changes in the contents of health-promoting compounds and antioxidant activity of broccoli upon domestic processing. Food Addit. Contam. 2006, 23, 1088–1098. [CrossRef][PubMed] 47. Chen, Q.Y.; Li, D.H.; Yang, H.H.; Zhu, Q.Z.; Zheng, H.; Xu, J.G. Novel spectrofluorimetric method for the determination of thiamine with iron (III) tetrasulfonatophthalocyanine as a catalyst. Analyst 1999, 124, 771–775. [CrossRef] 48. Konings, E.J.M. A validated liquid chromatographic method for determinating folates in vegetables, milk powder, liver, and flour. J. AOAC Int. 1999, 82, 119–127. [PubMed] 49. Jastrebova, J.; Witthöft, C.; Granath, A.; Svensson, U.; Jägerstad, M. HPLC determination of folates in raw and processed beetroots. Food Chem. 2003, 80, 579–588. [CrossRef]

Sample Availability: Not available.

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).